Dispute Resolution Briefing
|
|
- Britton Melvin Thomas
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dispute Resolution Briefing August 2014 Contents How enforceable is an obligation to negotiate? Introduction 01 The issue 01 The background facts 02 The decision 03 Conclusion 04 Contacts 05 Introduction Since the decision of the House of Lords in Walford v Miles (1992), it has been a truism in English law that our courts will not enforce a mere agreement to negotiate. However, in the recent case of Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Ltd (2014) the Commercial Court has found that a time limited obligation to seek to resolve a dispute by friendly discussion was an enforceable condition precedent to referring the dispute to arbitration. The issue Multi tiered dispute resolution clauses, wherein the parties agree to attempt to resolve their dispute using some form of alternative dispute resolution procedure before resorting to arbitration or litigation, play an important role in transactions of all types, and particularly in the context of complex agreements. When properly drafted, such clauses provide parties with the opportunity to avoid the time and expense that formal proceedings can involve, as well as enabling them to preserve ongoing commercial relationships more easily. However, historically multi tiered dispute resolution clauses have proved problematic. This is particularly because one of the essential requirements for the formation of a contract is that terms must be certain and the agreement complete. Thus, if the parties reach an agreement in principle but leave fundamental points unsettled, their contract will not amount to a binding agreement. An agreement to agree will therefore often be held to be unenforceable for uncertainty, although where the terms of the contract clearly indicate that the parties intend it to be enforceable, the court will generally seek to give effect to that intention. Agreements to negotiate have similarly been held to be too uncertain to have any binding force. In the leading case of Walford v Miles (1992), the owner of a business undertook to terminate negotiations to sell the business to a third party in exchange for the claimant s promise to continue negotiations to buy the business. The House of Lords held that wfw.com
2 02 DISPUTE RESOLUTION BRIEFING the claimant s promise was unenforceable, that a bare agreement to negotiate lacks the necessary certainty and that a duty to negotiate in good faith is inherently inconsistent with the position of a negotiating party (who must be free to threaten to withdraw or actually withdraw from negotiations as part of the negotiation process). This decision has been followed in various subsequent cases heard by the English courts, including: Cable & Wireless v IBM (2002), in which it was held that an obligation to attempt in good faith to settle a dispute would have been unenforceable but that an obligation to attempt in good faith to settle a dispute through alternative dispute resolution was sufficiently certain to be enforced because the procedure to be followed was that recommended by the Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution; and The House of Lords held...that a bare agreement to negotiate lacks the necessary certainty and that a duty to negotiate in good faith is inherently incosistent with the position of a negotiating party. Sulamérica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors (2012), in which the Court of Appeal held that a clause which provided that, before parties referred a dispute to arbitration, they would seek to have it resolved amicably by mediation, was insufficiently certain and thus unenforceable as it failed to set out a defined mediation process or refer to the services of a specific mediation provider. However, the courts of other common law jurisdictions have taken a different view. In particular, in Australia in the case of United Group Rail Services v Rail Corporation New South Wales (2009), the New South Wales Court of Appeal held that an obligation that the parties should meet and undertake genuine and good faith negotiation with a view to resolving the dispute before going to arbitration was enforceable. The judge in that case emphasised that the public policy in promoting efficient dispute resolution required that where possible real and enforceable content be given to agreements to negotiate to encourage parties to resolve disputes without expensive litigation. The Singapore courts and some ICSID tribunals have similarly held agreements to negotiate in good faith to be enforceable. The background facts Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Ltd concerned two parties who had entered into a long term agreement for the purchase of iron ore. However, the purchaser, Emirates Trading Agency, had failed to lift all of the iron ore in the first shipment year, and failed to lift any in the second shipment year. The seller, Prime Mineral Exports, terminated the agreement and sought over US$45 million in respect of liquidated damages. The claim was referred to arbitration but Emirates contended that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction on the grounds that the agreement required the parties to engage in time limited negotiations as a condition precedent to arbitration. The relevant clause of the agreement provided as follows: 11.1 In case of any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with or under this [agreement], the Parties shall first seek to resolve the dispute or claim by friendly discussion. Any party may notify the other Party of its desire to enter into consultation to resolve a dispute or claim. If no solution can be arrived at between the Parties for a continuous period of 4 (four) weeks then the non defaulting party can invoke the arbitration clause and refer the disputes to arbitration. The tribunal held that this clause was not enforceable but that, in any event, it had been complied with, and therefore found that it had jurisdiction. Emirates then applied to the
3 DISPUTE RESOLUTION BRIEFING 03 High Court pursuant to section 67 Arbitration Act 1996 for an order the tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The decision Construction of the clause The first issue for the judge to determine concerned the construction of the clause. Mr Justice Teare accepted that the first part of the clause provided that, before a party could refer a claim to arbitration, there had to be friendly discussions to resolve it, and that such discussions were a condition precedent to the right to refer a claim to arbitration. However, although Emirates contended that these discussions had to continue for four weeks, the judge doubted that this was the meaning which could reasonably have been intended by the parties. Moreover, the clause did not provide in terms that the friendly discussions must last four continuous weeks. Instead the judge considered that the clause meant that, if no solution could be found for a continuous period of four weeks, notwithstanding the fact that friendly discussions had taken place for some or all of that time, then arbitration could be invoked. Enforceability of the clause The judge then turned to the issue of the clause s enforceability. Having reviewed the relevant authorities, including United Group Rail Services, he commented that, where commercial parties have agreed a dispute resolution clause which purports to prevent them from launching into arbitration without first seeking to resolve their dispute by friendly discussions, the courts should seek to give effect to the partiesʹ bargain and moreover there is a public interest in so doing. In the judge s view, such an obligation to seek to resolve disputes by friendly discussions must import an obligation to seek to do so in good faith. He noted that such an agreement would not be incomplete and that, although it might be difficult to establish that a party has not sought to resolve a dispute in good faith, there will be cases where that can be shown, such as where a party refuses to negotiate at all and instead commences arbitration immediately. Although in Wah v Grant Thornton (2012) the English court stated that good faith is too open ended a concept or criterion to provide a sufficient definition of what such an agreement must as a minimum involve, Mr Justice Teare disagreed, noting that good faith connotes an honest and genuine approach to settling a dispute, and commenting that where a party clearly fails to honour such standards of conduct judges and commercial arbitrators will have no particular difficulty in recognising and identifying such failures. The judge went on to determine whether, despite these comments, he was nevertheless bound by English authority to hold that the relevant clause was unenforceable. He noted that Walford v Miles could be distinguished on the facts, on the basis that the obligation to negotiate in that case was not time limited, and Sulamérica could be distinguished on the basis that an agreement to mediate which fails to name a mediator or set out an agreed process by which a mediator can be appointed is incomplete, whereas an agreement to seek to resolve a dispute by friendly discussions in good faith is not incomplete. Mr Justice Teare thus concluded that there was no appellate authority which obliged him to hold that the agreement in this case was unenforceable and further, although other first instance judges have observed that an agreement to negotiate is unenforceable, the observations were not necessary for the relevant decisions. In the judge s view, such an obligation to seek to resolve disputes by friendly discussions must import an obligation to seek to do so in good faith. The judge therefore held that the dispute resolution clause in this case, which was a clause in an existing and enforceable contract which required the parties to seek to resolve a dispute by friendly discussions in good faith and within a limited period of time before Watson, Farley & Williams August 2014
4 04 DISPUTE RESOLUTION BRIEFING the dispute could be referred to arbitration, was enforceable on the following grounds: The agreement was not incomplete no term was missing. Similarly, it was not uncertain since an obligation to seek to resolve a dispute by friendly discussions in good faith has an identifiable standard, namely, fair, honest and genuine discussions aimed at resolving a dispute. Difficulty of proving a breach in some cases should not be confused with a suggestion that the clause lacks certainty. In the context of a dispute resolution clause pursuant to which the parties have voluntarily accepted a restriction upon their freedom not to negotiate it was not appropriate to suggest that the obligation to negotiate in good faith was inconsistent with the position of a negotiating party as the court had stated in Walford v Miles. Enforcement of such an agreement when found as part of a dispute resolution clause was in the public interest because: Commercial men expect the court to enforce obligations which they have freely undertaken; and Because the object of the agreement was to avoid what might otherwise be an expensive and time consuming arbitration. His judgment nevertheless represents a significant development in the English courts approach to such clauses. In this case, however, it was clear that there had been friendly discussions between the parties in an effort to resolve Prime Mineral s claim, which took place more than four weeks prior to the commencement of the arbitration. The arbitrators thus had jurisdiction to determine the dispute as the condition precedent, although enforceable, was satisfied. Conclusion Although Mr Justice Teare s decision that the agreement to negotiate was enforceable was, in this case, not determinative of the outcome, and the application for an order that the arbitration tribunal lacked jurisdiction failed, his judgment nevertheless represents a significant development in the English courts approach to such clauses. Mr Justice Teare clearly found the Australian court s decision in United Group Rail Services convincing, and indeed the fact that none of the English first instance judges had considered it in the cases he considered was a key distinguishing point as far as he was concerned. However, Mr Justice Teare did depart from the reasoning of the Australian court in one way. In United Group Rail Services it was held that an agreement to seek to settle a contractual dispute by negotiation would require the parties to be faithful to their existing bargain and not negotiate by reference to their wider commercial interests, save where the parties are proceeding by reference to an honest and genuine assessment of their rights and obligations. Mr Justice Teare considered this approach was unrealistically narrow, and that the types of matter which could be legitimately raised in the course of friendly discussions was unlimited. In accepting that a broad approach may be taken to negotiations Mr Justice Teare thus took a more commercial and arguably more realistic view of the way that parties seek to resolve their disputes. The decision is also notable for its approach to the concept of good faith, which has been the subject of recent discussion in the English courts, not least following the decision in Yam Seng Pte Ltd v International Trade Corp Ltd (2013), in which Mr Justice Leggatt advocated the recognition of a general duty of good faith. Although the English courts appear to maintain the view that there is no general obligation of good faith when it comes to reaching agreement as to the formation of a contract, there appears to be a gradual acceptance that obligations of good faith may be acceptable in the context of performance of a contract. Although Emirates concerned good faith obligations to negotiate, such
5 05 DISPUTE RESOLUTION BRIEFING obligations nevertheless formed part of the machinery of an existing agreement and the case could, therefore, be said to continue the trend. Parties will no doubt welcome the fact that, with this judgment, the court appears more willing to enforce their contractual intention when it come to agreements to negotiate in good faith. However, the extent to which it will be followed by other courts remains to be seen. Further, if it is followed, one key question which remains to be resolved is what relief will be available in circumstances where an agreement to negotiate has not been complied with. In this case the defendants were mainly arguing that the arbitration tribunal had no jurisdiction until the precondition of having friendly discussions for the required period of time had been satisfied. However, the court did comment on the possibility of claiming damages. While it may be difficult to determine what the outcome of negotiations might have been, it has been suggested that in appropriate circumstances damages may be awarded for loss of a chance. There are clearly many complex arguments yet to be had and these are unlikely to be resolved by friendly discussion. Regardless of the unanswered questions to which this case gives rise, now that the courts appear to be prepared to recognise a time limited duty to negotiate in good faith these provisions of multi tiered dispute resolution clauses should be carefully drafted and considered. Once agreed and should a dispute arise, these provisions should be carefully adhered to prior to commencing court proceedings or arbitrations. Generally the more specific these provisions are in relation to the requirements for negotiations (for example, as to the number of meetings and required attendees) the more likely they are to be given effect by the courts. Should you like to discuss any of the issues raised in this Briefing, please get in touch with the author below, or your regular contact at Watson, Farley & Williams. Contacts Andrew Hutcheon Partner London ahutcheon@wfw.com All references to Watson, Farley & Williams and the firm in this publication mean Watson, Farley & Williams LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. Any reference to a partner means a member of Watson, Farley & Williams LLP, or a member of or partner in an affiliated undertaking of either of them, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualification. This publication is produced by Watson, Farley & Williams. It provides a summary of the legal issues, but is not intended to give specific legal advice. The situation described may not apply to your circumstances. If you require advice or have questions or comments on its subject, please speak to your usual contact at Watson, Farley & Williams. This publication constitutes attorney advertising. Watson, Farley & Williams LON FG 15/08/2014 wfw.com
1. What are the current challenges to enforcement of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses?
England Simon Hart RPC London Simon.Hart@rpc.co.uk Law firm bio 1. What are the current challenges to enforcement of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses? There are two key challenges a party may face
More informationArticles. Hugs All Round: Have You Been Sufficiently Friendly to the Other Side? Markus Esly The Arbiter Fall 2014
Hugs All Round: Have You Been Sufficiently Friendly to the Other Side? Markus Esly The Arbiter Fall 2014 In a recent decision, the Commercial Court held that a clause requiring the parties to seek to resolve
More informationUK: Dispute Resolution Briefing
UK: Dispute Resolution Briefing September 2014 Contents A more efficient process 01 Emergency arbitrators 02 Party representation and conduct 03 Governing law 04 Conclusion 04 Contacts 05 Everything changes:
More informationAustralia. Mike Hales. MinterEllison Perth. Law firm bio
Australia Mike Hales MinterEllison Perth mike.hales@minterellison.com Law firm bio Co-Chair, IBA Litigation Committee and Conference Quality Officer 1. What are the current challenges to enforcement of
More informationTHE INTERPRETATION OF EXCLUSION CLAUSES
BRIEFING THE INTERPRETATION OF EXCLUSION CLAUSES MAY 2016 LITERAL AND NATURAL MEANING IS OF PRIMARY IMPORTANCE COMMERCIALITY MAY BE CONSIDERED THE COURT MAY ALSO CONSIDER APPLICATION OF THE CONTRA PROFERENTEM
More informationMulti-Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses Definition and Examples
! Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses Definition and Examples ASA Conference of September 15, 2017 Henry Peter Stefanie Pfisterer Overview of Bundle I. Examples of Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses...
More informationEnforceability of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses
KluwerArbitration Search term "enforceability of multitiered" Document information Author Didem Kayali (IAI profile) Publication Journal of International Arbitration Bibliographic reference Didem Kayali,
More informationWHEN IS A MEDIATION AGREEMENT ENFORCEABLE? - Thomas G. Heintzman
Page 1 WHEN IS A MEDIATION AGREEMENT ENFORCEABLE? - Thomas G. Heintzman One of the most difficult issues in the law of alternative dispute resolution is whether a mediation clause creates an enforceable
More informationProper law of the arbitration agreement how does it fit. with the rest of the contract? Professor Phillip Capper
Proper law of the arbitration agreement how does it fit with the rest of the contract? BIICL Fifteenth Annual Review of the Arbitration Act 1996 19 April 2012 Professor Phillip Capper What is the Issue?
More informationDRAFTING AND INTERPRETING GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION CLAUSES A PRACTICAL GUIDE
DRAFTING AND INTERPRETING GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION CLAUSES A PRACTICAL GUIDE 1. Introduction 2. Governing law a. Guide to governing law clauses b. Choosing a governing law 3. Jurisdiction a. Litigation
More informationENFORCING COMPLEX ISLAMIC FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS UNDER ENGLISH LAW
BRIEFING ENFORCING COMPLEX ISLAMIC FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS UNDER ENGLISH LAW FEBRUARY 2018 ENGLISH HIGH COURT HOLDS THAT A POTENTIALLY NON-SHARI A COMPLIANT FINANCING ARRANGEMENT STILL ENFORCEABLE AS A
More informationLAW GOVERNING ARBITRATION HAS CLOSEST CONNECTION TO LAW OF THE SEAT - Joachim Delaney
Page 1 LAW GOVERNING ARBITRATION HAS CLOSEST CONNECTION TO LAW OF THE SEAT - Joachim Delaney The Court of Appeal has upheld the first instance decision in Sulamerica Cia Nacional de Seguros SA v Enesa
More informationBRIEFING NIL BY MOUTH? EXCLUDING ORAL VARIATION OF CONTRACTS MAY 2018
BRIEFING NIL BY MOUTH? EXCLUDING ORAL VARIATION OF CONTRACTS MAY 2018 THE UK SUPREME COURT HAS OVERTURNED THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, AND DETERMINED THAT NO ORAL MODIFICATION CLAUSES ARE EFFECTIVE
More informationthe governing law of the Agreement is New York law; and
The Singapore High Court considers the issue of whether there is a binding independent arbitration agreement, when parties dispute the existence of the underlying contract 16 November 2016 Introduction
More informationDANGERS OF NOT OBSERVING THE LCIA ARBITRATION RULES
BRIEFING DANGERS OF NOT OBSERVING THE LCIA ARBITRATION RULES MARCH 2018 ENGLISH HIGH COURT FINDS REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION FOR DISPUTES UNDER TWO SEPARATE CONTRACTS INVALID ALSO GIVES USEFUL GUIDANCE ON
More informationDetermining The Proper Law Of An Arbitration Agreement
Determining The Proper Law Of An Arbitration Agreement Introduction An arbitration agreement is a unique clause in a contract because it exists separately from the contract in which it is found. Therefore,
More informationENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARDS
ARBITRATION: WHAT IN-HOUSE LAWYERS NEED TO KNOW ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARDS MARCH 2016 IN THIS BRIEFING WE EXAMINE: THE SCOPE OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION FORMALITIES FOR ENFORCEMENT GROUNDS
More informationMEMORANDUM FOR RESPONDENT
THE INTERNATIONAL ADR MOOTING COMPETITION HONGKONG 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR RESPONDENT TEAM NUMBER 005 TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS... 4 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES... 6 1. Treaties, Conventions, Laws and
More informationProjects Disputes in Australia: Recent Cases
WHITE PAPER June 2017 Projects Disputes in Australia: Recent Cases The High Court of Australia and courts in other Australian States have recently ruled on matters of significant importance to the country
More informationPAY NOW, ARBITRATE LATER?
BRIEFING PAY NOW, ARBITRATE LATER? OCTOBER 2018 ENGLISH HIGH COURT HOLDS THAT ONLY MATTERS THAT GO DIRECTLY TO ENFORCEABILITY OF ADJUDICATOR S DECISION WILL FALL WITHIN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT EXCEPTION
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL CONFIRMS PAYMENT OF HIRE UNDER TIME CHARTERPARTIES IS NOT A CONDITION
BRIEFING COURT OF APPEAL CONFIRMS PAYMENT OF HIRE UNDER TIME CHARTERPARTIES IS NOT A CONDITION DECEMBER 2016 THE OBLIGATION TO PAY HIRE PUNCTUALLY AND IN ADVANCE IS AN INNOMINATE TERM RATHER THAN A CONDITION
More informationChallenges of Mediation the need to address the English approach to agreements to mediate Maryam Salehijam*
Challenges of Mediation the need to address the English approach to agreements to mediate Maryam Salehijam* In the CJC Report on Mediation there is a brief mention of agreements to mediate: 9.15. The other
More informationArbitration 187 This Arbitration was governed by the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth). Contract type - GTA FOB Contract No.
Arbitration 187 This Arbitration was governed by the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth). Contract type - GTA FOB Contract No. 1 Date of Issue: January 2014 Claimant: & Respondent: Export FOB seller
More informationThe Benefits and Pitfalls of Mandatory Mediation Provisions in Commercial Contracts
The Benefits and Pitfalls of Mandatory Mediation Provisions in Commercial Contracts Presented by: David Tupper, Melanie Gaston and Chris Petrucci Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP February 25, 2015 - Calgary
More informationUK: Engineering, Procurement & Construction Briefing
UK: Engineering, Procurement & Construction Briefing May 2013 Contents Introduction 01 Liquidated damages vs penalty 01 causes a clear cut dichotomy? Varying the construction methods 03 to catch up how
More informationADDLESHAW GODDARD DOING BUSINESS IN THE GCC: A ROADMAP TO RESOLVING DISPUTES IN DUBAI
ADDLESHAW GODDARD DOING BUSINESS IN THE GCC: A ROADMAP TO RESOLVING DISPUTES IN DUBAI CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE REGION...2 2 COURT SYSTEM: A MULTI-FACETED JURISDICTION...4 3 A GATEWAY TO INTERNATIONAL
More informationINTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION QUARTERLY
International Arbitration June 2012 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION QUARTERLY The new CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2012: implications for arbitrations in the PRC China International Economic and Trade Arbitration
More informationWhich Law Governs the Arbitration Agreement? An Analysis of Sulamérica CIA Nacional de Seguros S.A. and others v Enesa Engenharia S.A.
Integrity. Experience. Innovation. www.markhumphries.co.uk Which Law Governs the Arbitration Agreement? An Analysis of Sulamérica CIA Nacional de Seguros S.A. and others v Enesa Engenharia S.A. and others
More informationBANGKOK TO MONTREAL GOING ALL THE WAY? DEVIATION OR DIRECT? MARCH 2015
BRIEFING BANGKOK TO MONTREAL GOING ALL THE WAY? DEVIATION OR DIRECT? MARCH 2015 THAILAND S NEW INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ACT WILL COME INTO FORCE ON 16 MAY 2015. THE LAW IS INTENDED TO GIVE EFFECT TO
More informationEnglish jurisdiction clauses should commercial parties change their approach?
Brexit legal consequences for commercial parties English jurisdiction clauses should commercial parties change their approach? February 2016 Issue in focus In our first Specialist paper on the legal consequences
More informationCITY INSOLVENCY DISCUSSION GROUP - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AND INSOLVENCY -
CITY INSOLVENCY DISCUSSION GROUP - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AND INSOLVENCY - Background I practice in the building and construction industry as a mediator and conciliator, assisting contracted parties in
More informationArgentina. Gonzalo Garcia Delatour. Estudio Beccar Varela Buenos Aires. Law firm bio. Sofía Eugenia Deferrari
Argentina Gonzalo Garcia Delatour Estudio Beccar Varela Buenos Aires gdelatour@ebv.com.ar Law firm bio Sofía Eugenia Deferrari Estudio Beccar Varela Buenos Aires sdeferrari@ebv.com.ar Law firm bio 1. What
More informationBrexit English law and the English Courts
Brexit Law your business, the EU and the way ahead Brexit English law and the English Courts Introduction June 2018 One of the key questions that commercial parties continue to raise in relation to Brexit,
More informationJuliette Luycks. Key Considerations Sample Arbitration Clauses Pathological Clause Model Clauses
International Commercial Arbitration seminar Juliette Luycks São Tomé and Príncipe 4 6 October 2011 Overview Key Considerations Sample Arbitration Clauses Pathological Clause Model Clauses Check List Elements
More informationThe enforceability of structured finance subordination provisions: where to next?
Page 1 Journal of International Banking & Financial Law/2010 Volume 25/Issue 5, May/Articles/The enforceability of structured finance subordination provisions: where to next? - (2010) 5 JIBFL 284 Journal
More informationFIRST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MOOT COMPETITION MEMORANDUM FOR CLAIMANT TEAM 130
FIRST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MOOT COMPETITION MEMORANDUM FOR CLAIMANT On behalf of: Against: Hampton SunCare Ltd. Heng SunCare Ltd. TEAM 130 Contents TABLE OF AUTHORITIES...
More informationJapan Arbitration Update: New JCAA Rules Comparison of Key Asian Arbitral Institutions
Japan Arbitration Update: New JCAA Rules Comparison of Key Asian Arbitral Institutions INTRODUCTION As we reported recently, the published new Commercial Arbitration Rules earlier this year. The new JCAA
More informationThe SIAC Arbitration Rules 2016: A detailed look at the new rules 1 August 2016
The SIAC Arbitration Rules 2016: A detailed look at the new rules 1 August 2016 The SIAC Arbitration Rules 2016 (the 2016 Rules) came into force on 1 August 2016 and apply to all arbitrations commenced
More informationRecent Developments in English Contract Law
September 2011 Recent Developments in English Contract Law BY GARRETT HAYES, ROSS MCNAUGHTON & GEORGE WESTON This Stay Current focuses on four significant recent cases in England which may have implications
More informationShari'ah Compliance Does Not Affect English Law Payments
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Shari'ah Compliance Does Not Affect English
More informationGRIEVANCE PROCEDURE BY-LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE BY-LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. STATUS 2 INTERPRETATION 2 PURPOSE 2 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 2 REPEAL OF THE FFA GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION REGULATIONS 3 CONSTITUENT EXCLUSION
More informationCHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A
CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT Section A Article 9.1: Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter: Centre means the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) established by the ICSID Convention;
More informationCommon law reasoning and institutions
Common law reasoning and institutions England and Wales Common law reasoning and institutions I. The English legal system and the common law tradition II. Courts, tribunals and other decision-making bodies
More informationSINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)
GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record - Supreme Court of India National President of Arbitration Bar of India
More informationArticles. Pathetically Pathological a Stumble Through the Maze of Dispute Resolution Clauses. Melanie Willems The Arbiter Winter 2015
Pathetically Pathological a Stumble Through the Maze of Dispute Resolution Clauses Melanie Willems The Arbiter Winter 2015 Arbitration is intended to be a more efficient and commercial alternative to litigating
More informationArbitration vs. Litigation
Arbitration vs. Litigation November 15, 2017 Choosing Your Dispute Resolution Method Wisely James Tancula Partner +1 312 701 7900 jtancula@mayerbrown.com Miles Robinson Partner +44 20 3130 3974 miles.robinson@mayerbrown.com
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. Between LEE YOUNG AND PARTNERS
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. P169 of 2017 Claim No. CV-2016-01522 Between LEE YOUNG AND PARTNERS (A Partnership and/or Firm registered under the laws of Trinidad
More informationIS A HARD-HITTING CONTRACTUAL TERM CONSTITUTIONALLY UNFAIR AND HENCE UNENFORCEABLE?
IS A HARD-HITTING CONTRACTUAL TERM CONSTITUTIONALLY UNFAIR AND HENCE UNENFORCEABLE? Mohamed's Leisure Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Southern Sun Hotel Interests (Pty) Ltd (183/17) [2017] ZASCA 176 (1 December 2017)
More informationGood Deals Gone Bad Drafting Dispute Resolution Provisions to Avoid International Disputes
Good Deals Gone Bad Drafting Dispute Resolution Provisions to Avoid International Disputes B. Ted Howes Partner + 1 212 506 2279 bhowes@mayerbrown.com Hannah C. Banks Associate + 1 212 506 2219 hbanks@mayerbrown.com
More informationTHE ENFORCEABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENTS. Emerging Problems and Issues
(2013) 25 SAcLJ Enforceability of ADR Agreements 455 THE ENFORCEABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENTS Emerging Problems and Issues The popularity of alternative dispute resolution ( ADR
More information> LEGAL PROFESSION ACT 2004
> LEGAL PROFESSION ACT 2004 Welcome... to the Legal Profession Act 2004 The fast-approaching new financial year heralds the arrival of the new Legal Profession Act 2004 and with it a raft of changes to
More informationJUDGES AS ARBITRATORS
Dr Howard Zelling A0 CBE* JUDGES AS ARBITRATORS INTRODUCTION should begin this article with a disclaimer. I have never appeared before a judge acting as an arbitrator, nor have I seen a judge acting in
More informationThe Astra : is failure to pay hire a breach of condition? Deug Rong Lee Partner
The Astra : is failure to pay hire a breach of condition? Deug Rong Lee Partner Introduction Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The Astra ) [2013] Is Failure to pay hire a breach of condition? Law
More informationDocuSign Envelope ID: D3C1EE91-4BC9-4BA9-B2CF-C0DE318DB461
Spanning Data Protection Addendum and Incorporating Standard Contractual Clauses for Controller to Processor Transfers of Personal Data from the EEA to a Third Country This Data Protection Addendum ("
More informationEvolution of dispute resolution under the FIDIC Red Book. Bill Smith, Partner 10 May 2018
Evolution of dispute resolution under the FIDIC Red Book Bill Smith, Partner 10 May 2018 Outline Disputes why a dispute resolution procedure is needed How the dispute resolution provisions in the FIDIC
More informationThe BVI Commercial Court Interfacing with Arbitration
Standing to Arbitrate? Liquidations and Arbitration When an application for a stay meets an application for summary judgment Commentary The BVI Commercial Court Interfacing with Arbitration Key recent
More informationDelay in Commencing an Arbitration
Delay in Commencing an Arbitration by ANDREW TWEEDDALE 1. INTRODUCTION Judge Martyn Zeidman recently commented: As stated in Magna Carta, justice delayed is justice denied. 1 The Limitation Acts are intended
More informationStructured Finance Subordination Provisions Upheld by High Court
Structured Finance Subordination Provisions Upheld by High Court Nick Shiren and Marco Crosignani This article explains a recent decision by England s High Court which highlights some of the uncertainties
More informationBRIEFING JANUARY 2016
BRIEFING C L E A R E R S K I E S A H E A D : T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L R E V I E W S T H E E X T E N T O F A M O R T G A G E E S D U T I E S O N S A L E O F A D I S T R E S S E D A S S E T JANUARY
More informationINTERNATIONAL ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MOOT COMPETITION MEMORANDUM FOR RESPONDENT. Chan Manufacturing. Team Number: 010
INTERNATIONAL ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MOOT COMPETITION MEMORANDUM FOR RESPONDENT Claimant: Respondent: Longo Chan Manufacturing Team Number: TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF AUTHORITIES...3 JOURNAL ARTICLES..6
More informationChapter Ten: Initial Provisions Comparative Study Table of Contents
A Comparative Guide to the Chile-United States Free Trade Agreement and the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement A STUDY BY THE TRIPARTITE COMMITTEE Chapter Ten: Initial
More information"HOME IS WHERE THE HEART IS" DOMICILE, JURISDICTION, AND ANCHOR DEFENDANTS
BRIEFING "HOME IS WHERE THE HEART IS" DOMICILE, JURISDICTION, AND ANCHOR DEFENDANTS SEPTEMBER 2017 WHAT WILL THE ENGLISH COURTS APPROACH BE TO DETERMINING WHETHER A DEFENDANT IS DOMICILED IN THE JURISDICTION?
More informationSurvey on Trends for Commercializing IP. Australia
Survey on Trends for Commercializing IP Australia Clayton Utz www.claytonutz.com Levels 19-35 No. 1 O'Connell St. Sydney, New South Wales 2000 Australia Tel: 61.2.9353.4000 / Fax: 61.2.8220.6700 PROTECTION
More informationSingapore High Court: Unravelling the unwind of accumulator contracts.
February 2016 Singapore High Court: Unravelling the unwind of accumulator contracts. Introduction On 10 February 2016, the Singapore High Court in Tan Poh Leng Stanley v UBS AG [2016] SGHC 17 delivered
More informationADR Systems Model Clause Language Effective October 16, Introduction: Model Alternative Dispute Resolution Clauses for Commercial Contracts
ADR Systems Model Clause Language Effective October 16, 2015 Introduction: Model Alternative Dispute Resolution Clauses for Commercial Contracts Conflict is inevitable. Even under the best of circumstances,
More informationTHE NEW PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING DISPUTES
BRIEFING THE NEW PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING DISPUTES JANUARY 2017 PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL REMAINS COMPULSORY BUT PROCEDURE HAS BEEN SCALED BACK COSTS CONSEQUENCES WILL BE IMPOSED
More informationTITLE 5: UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE DIVISION 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS
1201. General Definitions. Subject to additional definitions contained in the subsequent divisions of this title which are applicable to specific divisions or chapters thereof, and unless the context otherwise
More informationAnnual review of English Construction law developments. An international perspective
Annual review of English Construction law developments An international perspective May 2015 Contents 3 Introduction 4 Agreements to negotiate in good faith and to use reasonable endeavours to agree under
More informationData Processing Agreement
Data Processing Agreement This Data Protection Addendum ("Addendum") forms part of the Master Subscription Agreement ("Principal Agreement") between: (i) Inspectlet ("Vendor") acting on its own behalf
More informationUnilateral jurisdiction clauses Navigating the minefield
Unilateral jurisdiction clauses Navigating the minefield Article 23 September 2013 James Stacey and Angela Taylor advise caution when dealing with unilateral jurisdiction clauses. A recent French Supreme
More informationCHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CORP GUANGDONG BRANCH v MADIFORD LTD - [1992] 1 HKC 320
1 CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CORP GUANGDONG BRANCH v MADIFORD LTD - [1992] 1 HKC 320 HIGH COURT KAPLAN J ACTION NO 6563 OF 1991 2 March 1992 Arbitration -- Stay of proceedings -- Scope of arbitration
More informationThe new Arbitration (Guernsey) Law, a guide to the key provisions
JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE GUERNSEY BRIEFING May 2017 The new Arbitration (Guernsey) Law, 2016 - a guide to the key provisions Historically, parties in Guernsey have been reluctant to use arbitration
More informationCLSA GLOBAL PORTFOLIO TRADING SERVICES ANNEX. In this Annex, the following capitalised terms have the following meanings:
CLSA GLOBAL PORTFOLIO TRADING SERVICES ANNEX 1. Definitions and Interpretation In this Annex, the following capitalised terms have the following meanings: "Affiliates" shall mean members of the CLSA Group;
More informationCORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL. Contending with Brexit Uncertainties Governing Law Clauses. by Jennifer McGuire, James Byrne
CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL Contending with Brexit Uncertainties Governing Law Clauses by Jennifer McGuire, James Byrne Contending with Brexit Uncertainties Governing Law Clauses 23rd January 2017 by Jennifer
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION
BARBADOS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION Civil Suit No.: 0953 of 2014 BETWEEN C.O. WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION LTD. DEFENDANT/CLAIMANT AND 3S (BARBADOS) SRL APPLICANT/DEFENDANT AND
More informationWeek 4: Intention and Certainty
Week 4: Intention and Certainty Contract Law Intention - A contract can only be enforceable if the parties intended by that agreement to create legal relations. - This is tested objectively would a reasonable
More informationContract & Arbitration Law Developments In 2012
Contract & Arbitration Law Developments In 2012 Introduction 2012 saw a number of developments in the areas of contract and arbitration law. Over the course of the year, we have kept you informed with
More informationStaying court proceedings in favour of arbitration
On the publication of the second edition of Singapore International Arbitration Law and Practice (2 nd edition) (LexisNexis, 2018), David Joseph QC and David Foxton QC, the editors, offer some thoughts
More informationPRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW : CONFLICT OF LAWS
Arbitration under the Arbitration Act 1996 Aim: To provide a clear outline of the principal issues relating to the legally binding resolution of conflict of laws disputes via arbitration under the Arbitration
More informationA guide to civil litigation and arbitration in Hong Kong, from a Mainland perspective
A guide to litigation and arbitration in Hong Kong October 12014 A guide to civil litigation and arbitration in Hong Kong, from a Mainland perspective 1. Brief description of the civil litigation process
More informationSeminar for HKIS on: "Non-Payment and Termination of Contracts"
Seminar for HKIS on: "Non-Payment and Termination of Contracts" 13 May 2014 Joyce Leung, Associate Projects (Engineering & Construction) Practice Contractual Termination Conditional upon: 1. an event -
More informationFinality and Completeness of Agreement
Finality and Completeness of Agreement Certainty A contractual agreement must be in terms which define with a sufficient degree of certainty the obligations which the parties are to undertake. Incomplete
More informationEnforcement of Foreign Judgments. The Usual Rules Apply (no exception for insolvency)
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments The Usual Rules Apply (no exception for insolvency) The Supreme Court has just given judgment (24 October 2012) in Rubin and another v Eurofinance SA and others and New
More informationCONQUAS TRAINING CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM TERMS & CONDITIONS
1. Glossary 1.1. The following words and expressions have the following meanings, unless they are inconsistent with the context in which they are found:- AGREEMENT - these Terms and Conditions, the Letter
More informationBrexit Essentials: Dispute resolution clauses
Brexit Essentials: Dispute resolution clauses In this briefing, we consider the potential impact of Brexit on contractual dispute resolution clauses. EU law underpins these clauses. When that law ceases
More informationThird Circuit Holds That Claims Are Disallowable Under Section 502(d) of the Bankruptcy Code No Matter Who Holds Them
CLIENT MEMORANDUM Third Circuit Holds That Claims Are Disallowable Under Section 502(d) of the Bankruptcy Code No November 22, 2013 AUTHORS Paul V. Shalhoub Marc Abrams In a recent opinion, the United
More informationQuarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] SGHC 166
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] SGHC 166 by Andrew Battisson and Sunil Mawkin Allen & Overy LLP Singapore A commentary article reprinted
More informationEopply New Energy Technology Co Ltd v EP Solar Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 356 (19 April 2013)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgibin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/fca/2013/356.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=title%28eopply%2 0%29 Eopply New Energy Technology Co Ltd v EP Solar Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 356 (19 April 2013)
More informationAUSTRALIAN WEIGHTLIFTING FEDERATION LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN WEIGHTLIFTING FEDERATION LIMITED BY-LAW 1 APPEALS This By-law is made by the Australian Weightlifting Federation (AWF) Board under Clause 7.2 of the AWF Constitution. It is binding on AWF and
More informationCase 2:17-cv DB Document 48 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:17-cv-00207-DB Document 48 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION HOMELAND MUNITIONS, LLC, BIRKEN STARTREE HOLDINGS, CORP., KILO CHARLIE,
More informationTRADE MARK LICENCE. (d) (e)
TRADE MARK LICENCE Parties A No Lights No Lycra Pty Ltd ( NLNL ) B The party who has agreed to become a Licensee under the terms and conditions of this Agreement ("Licensee") Background A NLNL is the exclusive
More informationSabah Shipyard (Pakistan) Ltd v Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan
184 SINGAPORE LAW REPORTS (REISSUE) [2004] 3 SLR(R) Sabah Shipyard (Pakistan) Ltd v Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan [2004] SGHC 109 High Court Originating Motion No 31 of 2003 Judith Prakash
More informationBraes of Doune Wind Farm (Scotland) Ltd v Alfred McaLpine Business Services Ltd [2008] APP.L.R. 03/13
JUDGMENT : Mr. Justice Akenhead: TCC. 13 th March 2008 Introduction 1. There are two applications before the Court relating to the First Award of an arbitrator, Mr John Uff CBE QC. This award relates to
More informationRussia s Supreme Court Discusses Key Arbitration-Related Cases
Russia s Supreme Court Discusses Key Arbitration-Related Cases January 17, 2019 On 26 December 2018, the Presidium of the Russian Supreme Court (the Supreme Court ) has approved a review of jurisprudence
More informationBefore : MR JUSTICE KNOWLES CBE Between : (1) C1 (2) C2 (3) C3. - and
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 1893 (Comm) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION COMMERCIAL COURT Case No: CL-2015-000762 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 29/07/2016
More information(b) to appoint a board of reference as described in section 131 for the purpose of settling such disputes." (Industrial Relations Act 1988, s.
The Industrial Relations Commission s Power of Private Arbitration Justice Giudice First Annual General Meeting of the Australian Labour Law Association 14 November 2001 [1] Thank you for the honour of
More informationUK ATHLETICS LIMITED ( UKA ) DISCIPLINARY RULES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
UK ATHLETICS LIMITED ( UKA ) DISCIPLINARY RULES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES (adopted by the Board under Article 105 of UKA's Articles of Association, November 2013) INTRODUCTION
More informationSiemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award Summary: Argentina suspended its contract with Siemens and commenced renegotiations of the contract. However, while there was agreement, nothing was
More informationNew Expert Rules launched by the ICC
Colin Johnson, Head of International Arbitration in the Forensic team Grant Thornton UK LLP Barry Fletcher, Solicitor, and Dispute Resolution A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd. Registered office 1-3
More informationAvoiding jurisdictional disasters: How will the updated EU Jurisdiction Rules impact your dispute resolution strategy?
Dispute resolution October 2015 Update Avoiding jurisdictional disasters: How will the updated EU Jurisdiction Rules impact your dispute resolution strategy? The UK continues to retain its position as
More information