SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
|
|
- Harry Montgomery
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA File no (ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF QUÉBEC) BETWEEN: THE GLOBE AND MAIL, A DIVISION OF CTV GLOBEMEDIA PUBLISHING INC. APPLICANT (Petitioner in the Superior Court) - and - ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENT (Plaintiff in the Superior Court) - and - LE GROUPE POLYGONE ÉDITEURS INC. RESPONDENT (Defendant in the Superior Court) RESPONSE OF THE RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA TO THE APPLICANT S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AND APPLICATION FOR LEAVE (Sections 40 and 59(1) of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 27 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) John Sims, Q.C. John Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Deputy Attorney General of Canada Simon Ruel, Esq. Christopher M. Rupar, Esq. Department of Justice Canada Department of Justice Canada 5 th Floor Room René-Lévesque Blvd. West 234 Wellington Street Montréal, Québec H2Z 1X4 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H Tel Tel Fax Fax simon.ruel@justice.gc.ca christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca Counsel for the Respondent Attorney General of Canada Agent for the Respondent Attorney General of Canada Henri A. Lafortune Inc Limoges Street Tel. Longueuil, Québec J4G 1C Fax L lafortune@factum.ca
2 - 2 - Guy Du Pont, Esq. William Brock, Esq. Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP 26 th Floor 1501 McGill College Avenue Montréal, Québec H3A 3N Tel Fax gdupont@dwpv.com wbrock@dwpv.com Counsel for the Appellant Louis-P. Bélanger, Esq. Stikeman Elliott LLP Suite René-Lévesque Blvd. West Montréal, Québec H3B 3V Tel Fax lpbelanger@stikeman.com Counsel for the Respondent Le Groupe Polygone Éditeurs Inc.
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENTS Page FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA OVERVIEW...1 PART I STATEMENT OF FACTS...3 PART II CONCISE STATEMENT OF QUESTIONS IN ISSUE...7 PART III CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE ARGU- MENTS Whether the application for leave to appeal raises an issue of national importance which would justify an intervention of the Supreme Court of Canada?...8 National Post appeal...8 The Quebec Charter and Civil Code...8 The Quebec Court of Appeal offered advice on how to have the matter heard on appeal Whether an extension of time to file the application for leave to appeal is warranted in the circumstances?...10 PART IV SUBMISSIONS ON COSTS...13 PART V ORDERS SOUGHT...14 PART VI ALPHABETICAL TABLE OF AUTHORITIE...15 DOCUMENT IN SUPPORT R. v. Roberge, [2005] 2 S.C.R
4 - 1 - Overview FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA OVERVIEW 1. The matters raised by the Globe and Mail before this Court arose in the context of a dispute between the Globe and Mail and the Respondent Polygone, one in which the Attorney General of Canada deferred to the Court s discretion in the courts below. 2. In the context of proof and hearing of the Globe and Mail s motion to revoke an order permitting discovery of federal government employees with a view to establishing a defence of prescription on the part of Polygone, counsel for Polygone asked the Globe and Mail witness, journalist Daniel Leblanc, questions in relation to his source of information about the operation of the sponsorship program. The Globe and Mail objected to these questions on the ground that they violated the journalist confidential source relationship. Reference was made to the Wigmore rules for determining whether the information sought by the questioning was privileged. The motions judge dismissed the objection. On a motion for leave to appeal to the Quebec Court of Appeal, the single judge dismissed the motion on procedural grounds but offered advice on how to have the matter heard on appeal. 3. The Globe and Mail only now takes up the Court of Appeal justice s advice, in part. The Globe and Mail seeks leave to appeal to this Court the decision of the motion judge s dismissal of the objections based on journalist source relationship arguing, not what was argued before the motions judge, but rather the thesis that the matter needs to be dealt with under the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and the Quebec Civil Code, even though the issues are similarly approached under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the
5 - 2 - Overview Wigmore rules on privilege arising in the context of a journalist source relationship. 4. This is not an appropriate case where leave to appeal to this Court should be granted the National Post appeal before this Court may resolve many of the general issues raised here by the Globe and Mail; the arguments now being advanced have not been dealt with by either the motions judge or the Court of Appeal; there is no record to argue the matter satisfactorily before this Court; and the motions judge has not had the opportunity to fashion a remedy protecting the identity of the source, if revelation of his or her identity is likely from the questions being posed on discovery. 5. Further, an extension of time to seek leave to appeal should not be granted given the delays in bringing the matter in its present form before this Court and the absence of an immediate need to deal with the arguments now being advanced in the leave application
6 - 3 - Statement of Facts PART I STATEMENT OF FACTS 6. Following the proceedings of the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities ( Gomery Commission ), the Attorney General of Canada instituted a civil action to recover sponsorship funds in the amount of 63M$. 1 Le Groupe Polygone Éditeurs Inc. ( Polygone ), which was an important sponsorship recipient, is the main defendant in the action. 7. Information about the sponsorship program was provided to Globe and Mail journalist Daniel Leblanc by an informer dubbed Ma Chouette, starting in In 2006, following the publication of the report of the Gomery Commission, Mr. Leblanc published a book titled Code Name: Ma Chouette, where the existence of the informer was revealed and the communications between the journalist and the source reproduced. 8. In defence to the civil recovery action, Polygone pleads prescription and contends that if Mr. Leblanc s confidential source is a Government employee of a certain rank, knowledge could be imputed to the Government of Canada more than three years prior to the institution of the action In this context, orders were issued on May 18 and June 27, 2007, at the request of Polygone, by the Honourable Gilles Hébert of the Quebec Superior Court, then case managing judge of the civil recovery action, whereby 22 persons, among them federal public servants, were asked to respond in writing and under oath whether they were Ma Chouette, Daniel Leblanc s confidential informant. Pursuant to article 397 the Code of Civil Procedure, employees and former employees are not third parties. 1 2 The action was instituted on March 11, The time limitation period is three years as per section 2925 of the Quebec Civil Code.
7 - 4 - Statement of Facts 10. Upon learning about the existence of the written discovery orders, the Globe and Mail filed before the Quebec Superior Court a motion to revoke the orders at the request of a third party pursuant to section 489 of the Quebec Code of Civil Procedure. 11. At the hearing on the motion to revoke held on August 26, 2008, before the Honourable Jean-François de Grandpré of the Quebec Superior Court, the Globe and Mail counsel called the journalist Daniel Leblanc as its witness. 12. Counsel for Polygone cross-examined Mr. Leblanc and asked him the following questions, to which counsel for the Globe and Mail objected on the basis of relevance and of the protection of journalist source relationship: a) Did he have discussions with his confidential source after May 18, 2007? b) Did he have discussions with his confidential source after January 2008? c) Was the confidential source s name in the list of witnesses Justice Hébert allowed to be examined out of Court? d) Was the confidential source an employee of the federal government? e) If the confidential source was an employee of the federal government, what department did she work in? f) If the confidential source was an employee of the federal government, at what level of her department did she work? 13. The same day, on August 26, 2008, after argument, Mr. Justice de Grandpré rendered a short oral decision where he dismissed the objections as he found that the questions were relevant to the revocation proceedings and that the
8 - 5 - Statement of Facts information was not protected under the Wigmore rules for determining whether the information sought was privileged. 14. The Globe and Mail immediately filed before the Quebec Court of Appeal a motion to stay the revocation proceedings and a motion for leave to appeal the decision of Mr. Justice de Grandpré dismissing the objections. The matter was heard on August 26, 2008, by the Honourable Pierre J. Dalphond of the Quebec Court of Appeal, sitting alone. 15. In a decision rendered on September 8, 2008, Mr. Justice Dalphond dismissed the Globe and Mail s motions to stay the revocation proceeding and for leave to appeal. In his reasons, Mr. Justice Dalphond explained that the revocation proceeding was distinct from the underlying trial and indicated that, under paragraph 29(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, an interlocutory judgment rendered during such proceeding cannot be immediately appealed unless it dismisses an objection based on article 9 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms protecting professional secrecy or unless it allows an objection to evidence. 16. Mr. Justice Dalphond found that, if an appeal to the Quebec Court of Appeal was possible, it would be as of right based on article 9 of the Quebec Charter, if applicable to journalists, but not on leave. Mr. Justice Dalphond concluded in saying the following: 1. «En conclusion, je suis bien conscient des objections soulevées par le Globe and Mail et du fait qu elles méritent l attention de la Cour. Mais puisqu on n attaque pas la constitutionnalité de l art. 29 C.p.c., je dois l appliquer. Il s ensuit que je ne peux accorder une permission d appeler. Par contre, rien n empêche le Globe and Mail de déposer une inscription en appel en invoquant l art. 9 de la Charte québécoise. La Cour devra alors décider si la protection de cet article s étend aux
9 - 6 - Statement of Facts journalistes. Par contre, si le Globe and Mail est avisé que cette disposition est inapplicable, il devra s adresser à la Cour suprême du Canada dans la logique de l arrêt Dagenais ou encore de demander au juge de première instance les ordonnances de protection appropriées lors de la reprise de l instruction de la requête en rétractation.» 17. Following the release of Mr. Justice Dalphond s decision, the Globe and Mail did not file a notice of appeal to the Quebec Court of Appeal or immediately file an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. It rather chose to discontinue its revocation proceeding with the stated intention to protect its journalist from further testifying and from contempt. The Globe and Mail filed on the same day an intervention in Superior Court for the purpose of being informed and to be able to challenge future attempts to obtain the disclosure of the identity of the confidential informant. 18. Polygone challenged the right of the Globe and Mail to discontinue its revocation proceeding and, on November 5, 2008, Mr. Justice de Grandpré denied the Globe and Mail the right to discontinue and ordered the continuation or the revocation proceeding. On December 15, 2008, the Quebec Court of Appeal granted a motion presented by Polygone to dismiss an appeal filed by the Globe and Mail of that last decision. Leave to appeal of that decision before this Court was sought by the Globe and Mail Court No
10 - 7 - Concise Statement of Questions in Issue PART II CONCISE STATEMENT OF QUESTIONS IN ISSUE 19. Whether the application for leave to appeal raises issues of national importance which would justify an intervention of the Supreme Court of Canada? 20. Whether an extension of time to file the application for leave to appeal is warranted in the circumstances? 21. respectfully submits that the Globe and Mail has not met the criteria warranting an extension of time to file its application for leave to appeal and that the particular circumstances of this matter do not warrant an intervention of this Court
11 - 8 - Concise Statement of the Arguments PART III CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE ARGUMENTS 1. Whether the application for leave to appeal raises an issue of national importance which would justify an intervention of the Supreme Court of Canada? National Post appeal 22. The Globe and Mail suggests that its appeal would allow this Court to address a number of issues important to journalists, notably whether the journalist source relationship has stand alone constitutional protection, for example under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and if not how it relates to freedom of the press The Globe and Mail has intervened in the National Post appeal 5 to this Court and granting leave in the present case to make these same or similar arguments does not seem necessary. The Quebec Charter and Civil Code 24. The Globe and Mail, now with new counsel, seeks to re-argue its objections to questions asked at the hearing of its motion to revoke written discovery orders addressed to federal Government employees. 25. Now instead of arguing from the perspective of section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter, the Globe and Mail would argue the same objections based on section 3 of the Quebec Charter. Given that similar concerns are addressed by section 4 5 Paragraphs 35, 42 and 43 of the Applicant s Memorandum of Arguments. Court No
12 - 9 - Concise Statement of the Arguments 2(b) of the Canadian Charter and section 3 of the Quebec Charter, it would appear unnecessary to grant leave in the present matter as many of these issues may be resolved again by this Court s decision in National Post. 26. This is even more in this case where the matter was not addressed from the perspective of section 3 of the Quebec Charter either by the motions judge or the single judge in the Quebec Court of Appeal. The Quebec Court of Appeal offered advice on how to have the matter heard on appeal 27. Leave is normally sought from a court of appeal. In this case, that would be the decision dismissing the motion for leave to appeal the motions judge s decision dismissing objections to questions put to the Globe and Mail witness, the journalist Daniel Leblanc, on the grounds that the questions violate his journalist source privilege. 28. In its leave materials, the Globe and mail does not take issue with this decision of the single judge of the Court of Appeal dismissing the motion for leave. Rather it relies on the single judge s assessment of the issues as being important. 29. But, the Globe and Mail did not take up the single judge s invitation that it appeals directly to the Quebec Court of Appeal on whether or not article 9 of the Quebec Charter on professional secrecy applies to journalists, and consequently the impact of article 9 on the objections to the questioning of the journalist. Nonetheless in the present leave application, the Globe and Mail refers to
13 Concise Statement of the Arguments article 9 of the Quebec Charter as part of why the present matter should be of interest to this Court The Globe and Mail alleges confusion in the Quebec courts as to the proper relationship between Quebec s codified law and the common law dealing with similar issues. 7 At best, this allegation is based on a single decision of a Superior Court judge, here the motions judge, where it was the Globe and Mail s former counsel who made the arguments. 31. Surely, it is for the court of appeal of the province to first put order into matters which could have been brought before it where duly framed. 32. For all these reasons, the Respondent submits that this application for leave to appeal does not raise issues of national importance which would justify an intervention of this Court. 2. Whether an extension of time to file the application for leave to appeal is warranted in the circumstances? 33. The Respondent submits that this question should be answered in the negative. 34. Requests for extension of time for leave to appeal before this Court are governed by section 59 of the Supreme Court Act, and such requests may be granted under special circumstances. 35. In the case of R. v. Roberge, this Court stated the factors that should guide the exercise of the Court s discretion to extend time: 6 7 Paragraph 31 of the of the Applicant s Memorandum of Arguments. Paragraphs 28 and ff. of the Applicant s Memorandum of Arguments.
14 Concise Statement of the Arguments 6. The power to extend time under special circumstances in s. 59(1) of the Act is a discretionary one. Although the Court has traditionally adopted a generous approach in granting extensions of time, a number of factors guide it in the exercise of its discretion, including: 1. Whether the applicant formed a bona fide intention to seek leave to appeal and communicated that intention to the opposing party within the prescribed time; 2. Whether counsel moved diligently; 3. Whether a proper explanation for the delay has been offered; 4. The extent of the delay; 5. Whether granting or denying the extension of time will unduly prejudice one or the other of the parties; and 6. The merits of the application for leave to appeal. The ultimate question is always whether, in all the circumstances and considering the factors referred to above, the justice of the case requires that an extension of time be granted The Globe and Mail, a sophisticated litigant, represented by competent counsel, chose to discontinue its revocation proceeding rather than pursue appeal routes that were available. This has entailed a delay in bringing forward the present leave application of almost 7 months from the Court of Appeal s decision dismissing the motion for leave to appeal as brought before it. 37. The explanation of the delay is far from satisfactory. 8 R. v. Roberge, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 469, para. 6 (infra, p. 20).
15 Concise Statement of the Arguments 38. Moreover, the present leave application does not raise issues which this Court needs to resolve at this time. The National Post appeal before this Court may resolve many of the general issues raised here by the Globe and Mail, albeit under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter. The specificities of the Quebec Charter and Civil Code evidentiary provisions, while arguably open on the facts of the present case, were not argued before the motions judge and have not been taken to the Court of Appeal, as suggested at least in part by the single judge of the Court of Appeal. In short, the record is at best unsatisfactory to permit fully informed debate before this Court, with no assistance of reasoning from the motions judge or the Court of Appeal. 39. Considering all those factors, the Respondent submits that leave to extend time should be denied
16 Submissions on Costs PART IV SUBMISSIONS ON COSTS 40. Costs should follow the outcome of the matter
17 Orders Sought PART V ORDERS SOUGHT THE RESPONDENT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, PRAYS THIS COURT TO: DISMISS the application for leave to appeal filed by the Applicant, the Globe and Mail; DISMISS the Applicant s application for extension of time to file the application for leave to appeal; THE WHOLE with costs. Montreal, Quebec, this 24 th day of April 2009 John Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Simon Ruel, Esq. Christopher M. Rupar, Esq. Counsel and Agent for the Respondent,
18 Alphabetical Table of Authorities PART VI ALPHABETICAL TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Jurisprudence Paragraph R. v. Roberge, [2005] 2 S.C.R
DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY
Court File No.: T-2084-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY Dated: January 31, 2014 DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK 392 Grosvenor
More informationApplication for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada: A Practical Guide. Compiled by: Hossein Moghtaderi. Anna Du Vent
Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada: A Practical Guide Compiled by: Hossein Moghtaderi Anna Du Vent July 2013 I. Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
More informationThe Honourable Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer RALPH PROPHÈTE. and REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
Date: 20080312 Docket: IMM-3077-07 Citation: 2008 FC 331 Ottawa, Ontario, March 12, 2008 PRESENT: The Honourable Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer BETWEEN: RALPH PROPHÈTE and Applicant THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
More informationPLAINTIFF S MOTION TO PROLONG THE DEADLINE TO INSCRIBE FOR PROOF AND HEARING (Article C.C.P)
PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL Plaintiff / Petitioner Defendant / Respondent PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO PROLONG THE DEADLINE TO INSCRIBE FOR PROOF AND HEARING (Article 110.1 C.C.P) TO ONE OF THE HONOURABLE
More informationCanada: Electronic Commerce Law Overview
Canada: Electronic Commerce Law Overview Stikeman Elliott LLP Canada: Electronic Commerce Law Overview... 2 Jurisdiction... 2... 2 Dealing with the Uncertainty... 4 Electronic Commerce Legislation... 4...
More informationDEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY
Court File No.: T-2084-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIR LINES, INC. and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiffs and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY Dated: January 18,
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More information[4] The defendant is a corporation incorporated under the laws of Ontario carrying on business as a theme water park in Limoges Ontario.
CITATION: CYR v. CALYPSO PARC INC. 2016 ONSC 2683 COURT FILE NO.: 12-54440 DATE: May 11, 2016 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: FRANCINE CYR Plaintiff AND: CALYPSO PARC INC. Defendant BEFORE: COUNSEL:
More information-and- MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INSTITUTE A CLASS ACTION AND TO OBTAIN THE STATUS OF REPRESENTATIVE (Articles 1002 et seq. C.C.P.
CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL No: 500-06-000725-149 SUPERIOR COURT (Class action) CHANTALE TAILLON, residing and domiciled at 221, rue Dupernay, in the city of Boucherville, district of
More informationand YOSSEF MARCIANO, -vs- and
C A N A D A PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF MONTRÉAL NO: 500-06-000960-183 TOMAS MCENIRY, (Class Action) S U P E R I O R C O U R T and YOSSEF MARCIANO, Applicants -vs- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUÉBEC, having
More informationUniform Class Proceedings Act
8-1 Uniform Law Conference of Canada Uniform Class Proceedings Act 8-2 Table of Contents PART I: DEFINITIONS 1 Definitions PART II: CERTIFICATION 2 Plaintiff s class proceeding 3 Defendant s class proceeding
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TRIAL DIVISION (GENERAL) ANDREW ABBASS
Court File No._ 20140460249 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TRIAL DIVISION (GENERAL) BETWEEN: ANDREW ABBASS APPLICANT (Respondent) AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationIRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN
IRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN MISE EN GARDE Le Barreau de Montréal organise de nombreuses activités et conférences à l'intention de ses membres. Certains conférenciers acceptent gracieusement que le Barreau
More informationAPPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INSTITUTE A CLASS ACTION AND TO OBTAIN THE STATUS OF REPRESENTATIVE (Arts. 574 ff. C.C.P.)
CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF MONTRÉAL N o (Class Action) SUPERIOR COURT MARTINE ROY, 111 Chemin de la pointenord, Unité 130, Ile des Sœurs, Québec H3E 0B3 Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA,
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: LONE PINE RESOURCES INC. AND Claimant GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Respondent
More informationTO : THE JUDICIAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMISSION 2007
TO : THE JUDICIAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMISSION 2007 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO DOCUMENTS RECEIVED BY THE COMMISSION REGARDING THE SUBMISSION FOR A SALARY DIFFERENTIAL FOR JUDGES OF COURTS OF APPEAL
More informationCLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationJOHN DOE #1, proposed representative Respondent on behalf of a class of Respondents RESPONDENT (DEFENDANT)
Court File No. T-662-16 FEDERAL COURT PROPOSED CLASS PROCEEDING B E T W E E N: VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, COBBLER NEVADA, LLC, PTG NEVADA, LLC, CLEAR SKIES NEVADA, LLC, GLACIER ENTERTAINMENT SARL OF LUXEMBOURG,
More informationKPMG Inc. Tour KPMG Suite de Maisonneuve Blvd. West Montréal (Québec) H3A 0A3 KPMG INC.
KPMG Inc. Tour KPMG Suite 1500 600 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West Montréal (Québec) H3A 0A3 Telephone (514) 840-2100 Fax (514) 840-2121 Internet www.kpmg.ca CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL No.:
More informationDEVELOPPEMENT CENTRAL VILLE DE LISLE Defendant. DEVELOPPEMENT PLATEAU LA- MIsE-EN. SIDNEY LEIBOVITCH and EDWARD
S.C.R SUPREME COURT OF CANADA 603 DEVELOPPEMENT CENTRAL VILLE DE LISLE Defendant AND SIDNEY LEIBOVITCH and EDWARD LEIBOVITCH Plaintiffs AND APPELLANT RESPONDENTS June26 DEVELOPPEMENT PLATEAU LA- MIsE-EN
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA File No. 33813 (ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) BETWEEN: LINDA DALE GIBBONS - and - APPELLANT (Appellant) HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN RESPONDENT (Respondent)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) LUIS ALBERTO HERNANDEZ FEBLES. and
Court File No. 35215 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) Between: LUIS ALBERTO HERNANDEZ FEBLES APPELLANT and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION RESPONDENT
More informationFRANCOPHONE EDUCATION AUTHORITIES REGULATION. Authority: School Act, s. 175
Authority: School Act, s. 175 B.C. Reg. 212/99... Effective July 9, 1999 Editorial Edits by Registrar of Regulations... Effective December 22, 1999 Amended by B.C. Reg. 277/02... Effective October 11,
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL. NOTICE OF MOTION (Motion for Leave to Intervene)
Court File No. A-145-12 FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Appellant - and - AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL, CHIEFS OF ONTARIO, FIRST NATIONS CHILD & FAMILY CARING SOCIETY, ASSEMBLY OF
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10 BEFORE: HEARING: J. P. Moore : Vice-Chair B. Davis : Member Representative of Employers A. Grande : Member Representative of Workers
More informationAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL CANADA and BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION Appellants. and
CORAM: RICHARD C.J. DESJARDINS J.A. NOËL J.A. Date: 20081217 Docket: A-149-08 Citation: 2008 FCA 401 BETWEEN: AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL CANADA and BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION Appellants and
More informationACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT
ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT ANNUAL REPORT 2009-2010 This publication is available upon request in accessible formats. For a print copy of this publication, please contact: Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying
More informationYork Regional Police. Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act
York Regional Police Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act September 2014 Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act Application and General 1.0 These
More informationDECISION OF INQUIRY COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED BY THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC INQUIRY CONCERNING MR. JUSTICE ROBERT FLAHIFF
(TRANSLATION) DECISION OF INQUIRY COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED BY THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC INQUIRY CONCERNING MR. JUSTICE ROBERT FLAHIFF RE: PRELIMINARY MOTIONS BY JUDGE CONCERNED Montréal,
More informationFEDERAL COURT. THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION and THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEE LAWYERS. - and -
FEDERAL COURT Court File No. B E T W E E N : THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION and THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEE LAWYERS - and - Applicants THE MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION REFUGEES AND
More informationTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KELEN LETWLED KASAHUN TESSMA (AYELE) - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
Date: 20031002 Docket: IMM-5652-02 Citation: 2003 FC 1126 Ottawa, Ontario, this 2 nd day of October, 2003 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KELEN BETWEEN: LETWLED KASAHUN TESSMA (AYELE) Applicant - and
More informationSCC File No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL)
SCC File No. 37276 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: DELTA AIR LINES INC. APPELLANT (Respondent) - and - DR. GÁBOR LUKÁCS RESPONDENT (Appellant) - and
More informationMandat de perquisition Ordonnance de scellé Demande de révision en vertu de 487.3(4) C.cr. Révision effectuée ex parte et in camera COURT OF QUEBEC
World Tamil Movement c. Canada (Attorney General) 2007 QCCQ 7254 Mandat de perquisition Ordonnance de scellé Demande de révision en vertu de 487.3(4) C.cr. Révision effectuée ex parte et in camera CANADA
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION BOARD REGULATION
Province of Alberta NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION BOARD ACT RULES OF PRACTICE OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION BOARD REGULATION Alberta Regulation 77/2005 With amendments up to and including Alberta
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: R. v. Awashish, 2018 SCC 45 APPEAL HEARD: February 7, 2018 JUDGMENT RENDERED: October 26, 2018 DOCKET: 37207 BETWEEN: Her Majesty The Queen Appellant and Justine Awashish
More informationIRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN
IRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN MISE EN GARDE Le Barreau de Montréal organise de nombreuses activités et conférences à l'intention de ses membres. Certains conférenciers acceptent gracieusement que le Barreau
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Financial Services Tribunal Tribunal des services financiers RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL Ce document est également disponible en français TABLE
More informationFEDERAL COURT AIR CANADA. -and-
Court file No. T- I Y ')3 ~ I) FEDERAL COURT AIR CANADA Applicant -and- ROBERT ADAMSON, ROBERT DAVID ANTHONY, JACOB BAKKER, DONALD BARNES, MICHAEL BINGHAM, DOUG BOYES, KENNETH BUCHHOLZ, DANIEL BURROWS,
More informationFEDERAL COURT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. -and-
Court File No. T- ' \ ~ - A- FEDERAL COURT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA -and- APPLICANT FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY CARING SOCIETY OF CANADA, ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS, CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION,
More informationStanding Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics
Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics ETHI NUMBER 031 2nd SESSION 41st PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Wednesday, February 4, 2015 Chair Mr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault 1 Standing Committee on
More informationEFFECTIVE DATE: November 18, 2005
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL ARCS/ORCS FILE NUMBER: 55820-00 (and issue specific) SUBJECT: Legal Advice to the Police POLICY Statement of Principle
More informationPrayers for relief in international arbitration
Prayers for relief in international arbitration Infra petita and ultra petita Deciding only what was asked, and nothing more 17 November 2017 Claire Morel de Westgaver 1 Ultra petita W h e n d o e s i
More informationArchived Content. Contenu archivé
Archived Content Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived
More informationInquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation
Inquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Inquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation
More informationOriginal: English No. ICC-01/05-01/08 OA 4 Date: 18 August 2010 THE APPEALS CHAMBER
ICC-01/05-01/08-857 18-08-2010 1/8 CB T OA4 Cour Pénale liitematioiiale liiteroatiorial Crimirial Court Original: English No. ICC-01/05-01/08 OA 4 Date: 18 August 2010 THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) NELL TOUSSAINT. and
S.C.C. File No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: NELL TOUSSAINT Applicant Appellant and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Respondent
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DAVID CARMICHAEL. -and-
(1fl ~ I CJ~!fl%'1( Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DAVID CARMICHAEL -and- Plaintiff VIA RAIL CANADA INC., CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY, and CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY Defendants
More informationMUTUMBA, Fahad Huthy. and REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT. [1] In a situation of choice wherein one could remove oneself or extricate oneself, yet,
Date: 20090107 Docket: IMM-2668-08 Citation: 2009 FC 19 Ottawa, Ontario, January 7, 2009 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore BETWEEN: MUTUMBA, Fahad Huthy and Applicant THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
More informationPRIVACY ACT ANNUAL REPORT
PRIVACY ACT ANNUAL REPORT 216-17 This publication is available upon request in accessible formats. For a print copy of this publication, please contact: Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying 255 Albert
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: R. v. Vellone, 2011 ONCA 785 DATE: 20111214 DOCKET: C50397 MacPherson, Simmons and Blair JJ.A. BETWEEN Her Majesty the Queen Ex Rel. The Regional Municipality of York
More informationReport on Investigation
sariat au lobbying ada Office of the Commissioner Commissariat au lobbying of Lobbying du Canada of Canada Office of the Commissioner Commissariat au lobbying of dulobbying Canada of Canada Office of the
More informationIn the Arbitration under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. Eli Lilly and Company.
Case No. UNCT/14/2 In the Arbitration under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules BETWEEN: Eli Lilly and Company CLAIMANT/INVESTOR - and - Government
More informationS U P E R I O R C O U R T (Commercial Division)
CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL No.: 500-11-049256-155 S U P E R I O R C O U R T (Commercial Division) IN THE MATTER OF THE PLAN OF COMPROMISE AND ARRANGEMENT OF: MAGASIN LAURA (P.V.) INC.
More informationReasons and Decision Motifs et décision
IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE BOARD OF CANADA IMMIGRATION APPEAL DIVISION COMMISSION DE L IMMIGRATION ET DU STATUT DE RÉFUGIÉ DU CANADA SECTION D APPEL DE L IMMIGRATION Appellant(s) IAD File No. / N o de dossier
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 13 August 2015, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Jon Newman (USA), member Mario Gallavotti (Italy),
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Bartram v. Glaxosmithkline Inc., 2011 BCCA 539 Date: Docket: CA Meah Bartra
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Bartram v. Glaxosmithkline Inc., 2011 BCCA 539 Date: 20111230 Docket: CA039373 Meah Bartram, an Infant by her Mother and Litigation Guardian,
More informationFile No.: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE QUÉBEC COURT OF APPEAL) - and - THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF CANADA
File No.: 33313 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE QUÉBEC COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: TIBERIU GAVRILA - and - Appellant (Applicant) THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF CANADA Respondent (Respondent)
More informationFederal Court Reports Williams v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (F.C.A.) [2005] 3 F.C. 429
Federal Court Reports Williams v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (F.C.A.) [2005] 3 F.C. 429 Date: 20050412 Docket: A-241-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 126 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON
More informationSITUATION EN CÔTE D IVOIRE AFFAIRE LE PROCUREUR c. LAURENT GBAGBO ANNEXE 3 PUBLIQUE EXPURGÉE
ICC-02/11-01/11-647-Anx3-Red 16-05-2014 1/9 NM PT SITUATION EN CÔTE D IVOIRE AFFAIRE LE PROCUREUR c. LAURENT GBAGBO ANNEXE 3 PUBLIQUE EXPURGÉE Tableau recensant les erreurs commises par la victimes lorsqu
More informationRULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS
RULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS 82.01 (1) In this rule, unless the context requires otherwise: "appeal" includes an application for leave to appeal and a crossappeal; (appel)
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS... 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2014-2015 HIGHLIGHTS... 3 OVERVIEW OF THE 2014-2018 STRATEGIC PLAN AND RESULTS FOR 2014-2015... 5 COURT CASES...... 9 Groupe Radio Simard ET Radio Dégelis inc.... 9 ENGINEERING FIRM BPR...
More informationNOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE LAWN MOWERS CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE LAWN MOWERS CLASS ACTION Read this Notice Carefully as it May Affect Your Rights TO: All persons in Canada who between January
More informationFile No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION.
File No. 34470 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) B E T W E E N: Rachidi EKANZA EZOKOLA - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION -and- APPELLANT (Respondent)
More informationFRANCIS OJO OGUNRINDE. and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS; THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Federal Court Cour fédérale Ottawa, Ontario, June 15, 2012 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Russell BETWEEN: FRANCIS OJO OGUNRINDE and Date: 20120615 Docket: IMM-6711-11 Citation: 2012 FC 760 Applicant
More informationBritish Columbia. Health Professions Review Board. Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.
British Columbia Health Professions Review Board Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 183 These rules for reviews to the Health Professions Review
More informationBill 28 (2014, chapter 1) An Act to establish the new Code of Civil Procedure
FIRST SESSION FORTIETH LEGISLATURE Bill 28 (2014, chapter 1) An Act to establish the new Code of Civil Procedure Introduced 30 April 2013 Passed in principle 24 September 2013 Passed 20 February 2014 Assented
More informationV. v. FAO. 124th Session Judgment No. 3880
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal V. v. FAO 124th Session Judgment No. 3880 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering
More informationCANADA GOOSE HOLDINGS INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2017 Registration No. 333- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT under
More informationWASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT. This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false claims act.
Added by Chapter 241, Laws 2012. Effective date June 7, 2012. RCW 74.66.005 Short title. WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false
More informationPRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. Public Document
ICC-01/04-111 06-02-2006 1/11 UM 1/11 Cour Pénale Internationale International Criminal No. icc-oi/04 Datc: 6 February 2006 Original: English PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Claude Jorda, Presiding Judge
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE ONTARIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Toll-free 1.877.262.7762 www.virtualassociates.ca AMENDMENTS TO THE ONTARIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE This chart is updated as of July 1, 2017. This table is intended as a guideline only. The statutory
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) ) of 'fiio.«-'", ONTARIO. - and -
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No.: CV- IO-412963-00CP THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE PERELL ) ) ) \'t\.. "'~"'1s ' the.2~"'\ ay of 'fiio.«-'", 201 2 ", BETWEEN: )', ) r I I... ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT
More informationSASKATCHEWAN COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH RULES RESPECTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 501 SASKATCHEWAN COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH RULES RESPECTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES (SI/86-158, Canada Gazette (Part II), September 3, 1986.) 1 When an accused is to be tried with a jury,
More informationIn the Court of Appeal of Alberta
In the Court of Appeal of Alberta Citation: Bahcheli v. Yorkton Securities Inc., 2012 ABCA 166 Date: 20120531 Docket: 1101-0136-AC Registry: Calgary Between: Tumer Salih Bahcheli Appellant (Plaintiff)
More informationCANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL. and CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION. and AIR CANADA NOTICE OF MOTION THE " FLY PAST 60 COALITION "
Tribunal File No. T1079 / 6005 CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: GEORGE VILVEN and CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION and AIR CANADA Complainant Commission Respondent NOTICE OF MOTION THE " FLY PAST
More informationHAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47
HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47 LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Subchapter 1
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) NELL TOUSSAINT. and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) File Number: 34336 BETWEEN NELL TOUSSAINT Applicant Appellant and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Respondent
More informationPUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of June 7, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton, AB
More informationRhode Island False Claims Act
Rhode Island False Claims Act 9-1.1-1. Name of act. [Effective until February 15, 2008.] This chapter may be cited as the State False Claims Act. 9-1.1-2. Definitions. [Effective until February 15, 2008.]
More informationThe Attorney General of Canada s Directive on Civil Litigation Involving Indigenous Peoples
The Attorney General of Canada s Directive on Civil Litigation Involving Indigenous Peoples 2 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means,
More informationParole Board of Canada: Contributing to Public Safety
Parole Board of Canada: Contributing to Public Safety Produced and published by: For additional copies of this publication, contact: Communications Division 410 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON K1A 0R1 Electronic
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 194/16
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 194/16 BEFORE: S. Martel: Vice-Chair HEARING: January 21, 2016 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: March 23, 2016 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2016 ONWSIAT
More informationALBERTA CENTENNIAL MEDAL ACT
Province of Alberta ALBERTA CENTENNIAL MEDAL ACT Statutes of Alberta, 2005 Chapter A-14.8 Current as of December 1, 2005 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL)
BETWEEN: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) cmppewas OF THE THAMES FIRST NATION -and- File No. 36776 APPLICANT (Appellant) ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC. THE NATIONAL
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA. CITATION: Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. The Queen, 2011 SCC 3 DATE: DOCKET: 32987
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. The Queen, 2011 SCC 3 DATE: 20110128 DOCKET: 32987 BETWEEN: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen and Stéphan
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL DIVISION. What It Is and How It Works. qwewrt
IMMIGRATION APPEAL DIVISION What It Is and How It Works qwewrt ISBN 0-662 63824 7 Catalogue Number MQ21 18/1998 Produced by: Parliamentary and Public Affairs Immigration and Regugee Board Canada Building
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
CITATION: Nazik Amdiss and University of Ottawa, Ltd., 2010 ONSC 4738 COURT FILE NO.: 10-49202 DATE: 20100831 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: NAZIK AMDISS Plaintiff and UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA
More informationSUPERIOR COURT CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF OF MONTREAL. No CHARLES LE. Petitioner
SUPERIOR COURT DISTRICT OF OF MONTREAL No. 500-06-000678-132 CHARLES LE Petitioner \f. ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL ZOTAC USA INC. XFX- U.S.A. DELL GIGABYTE TECHNOLOGY USA PNY TECHNOLOGIES INC. EVGA CORPORATION
More informationPotential Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Legislation
PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE LE CENTRE POUR LA DEFENSE DE L INTERET PUBLIC ONE Nicholas Street, Suite 1204, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 7B7 Tel: (613) 562-4002. Fax: (613) 562-0007. e-mail: piac@piac.ca.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL R. ROBITAILLE. -vs.- -and-
1 CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL NO: 500-06-000325-056 (Class Action) SUPERIOR COURT R. ROBITAILLE Petitioner -vs.- YAHOO! INC., a corporation created by virtue of the laws of the United
More information. COURT OF APPEAL RULES
. COURT OF APPEAL RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I TITLE AND INTERPRETATION 1 Title 2 Interpretation PART II PURPOSE AND APPLICATION OF THE RULES 3 Purpose of rules 4 Application of the rules 5 Where no
More informationSubmitted by: John Ballantyne, Elizabeth Davidson and Gordon McIntyre
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Ballantyne, Davidson and McIntyre v. Canada Communications Nos. 359/1989 and 385/1989 1/ 11 April 1991 CCPR/C/41/D/359/1989 and 385/1989* ADMISSIBILITY Submitted by: John Ballantyne,
More information1.1.3 Notice of Memorandum of Understanding with the China Securities Regulatory Commission MEMORANDUM
1.1.3 Notice of Memorandum of Understanding with the China Securities Regulatory Commission Memorandum of Understanding with the China Securities Regulatory Commission The Ontario Securities Commission,
More informationTechnical Standards and Safety Authority. Rules of Practice
Technical Standards and Safety Authority Rules of Practice APPEALS FILED UNDER SUBSECTION 22.(1) OF THE TECHNICAL STANDARDS & SAFETY ACT, 2000, S.O. 2000, CHAPTER 16 April, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENT TSSA Rules
More informationStanding Committee on the Status of Women
Standing Committee on the Status of Women FEWO NUMBER 065 1st SESSION 41st PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Thursday, March 21, 2013 Chair Ms. Marie-Claude Morin 1 Standing Committee on the Status of Women Thursday,
More informationMEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF AIR CANADA (A )
Court File nos: A-105-14, A-111-14, A-112-14 FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: ROBERT ADAMSON ET AL. and AIR CANADA and AIR CANADA PILOTS ASSOCIATION Appellants and CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION and
More informationGENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE. Original: English DS12/R CANADA/EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - ARTICLE XXVIII RIGHTS
GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE RESTRICTED DS12/R 26 October 1990 Limited Distribution Original: English CANADA/EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - ARTICLE XXVIII RIGHTS Award by the Arbitrator In document DS12/3,
More informationThe Capital Markets Act - A Revised Consultation Draft
The Capital Markets Act - A Revised Consultation Draft I. Overview of the Revised Consultation Draft The uniform Capital Markets Act 1 (CMA), which will be proposed for enactment by each participating
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT J. WILSON, KARAKATSANIS, AND BRYANT JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star and Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2010 ONSC 991 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 34/09 DATE: 20100326 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL
More informationStanding Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security SECU NUMBER 055 1st SESSION 42nd PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Monday, March 6, 2017 Chair Mr. Robert Oliphant 1 Standing Committee on Public Safety and
More information