DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY
|
|
- Madison Lee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Court File No.: T FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY Dated: January 31, 2014 DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK 392 Grosvenor Avenue Westmount, Québec H3Z 2M2 Tel: jcooperstock@gmail.com Defendant / Moving Party
2 TO: GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP 1 Place Ville Marie, 37th Floor Montreal, Quebec H3B 3P4 Me Hélène D Iorio Tel: Fax: Me Lee A. Johnson Tel: Fax: Solicitor for the Plaintiff, United Airlines, Inc.
3 - 1 - Court File No.: T FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant REPLY OF THE MOVING PARTY, DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK A. OVERVIEW 1. The Defendant, Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock is appealing the Order of the learned Prothonotary refusing to strike out abandoned/withdrawn claims in the Statement of Claim and refusing to award Dr. Cooperstock costs thrown away. 2. Regrettably, the Plaintiff has used its responding motion record to attack Dr. Cooperstock personally by accusing him of causing unnecessary delays and withholding consent to amend the Statement of Claim. As explained below, these allegations are false and serve the purpose of creating prejudice against Dr. Cooperstock and deflecting attention from the question of law that this appeal raises.
4 Striking out abandoned/withdrawn claims from the Statement of Claim is particularly necessary in the present case due to the repeated attempts of the Plaintiff and its counsels to create prejudice against Dr. Cooperstock even at the cost of misleading the courts, a conduct that has attracted the attention of the Barreau du Québec (investigation no.: # DE). B. NO NEED FOR AN ORAL HEARING 4. Dr. Cooperstock submits that it would be more expedient if the present motion were decided in writing, since the positions of both parties are already before the Court by way of written submissions. 5. Dr. Cooperstock has advised the Plaintiff on multiple occasions that he would have an exceptionally heavy workload between January and April Thus, the Plaintiff is fully aware of the hardship that it would cause Dr. Cooperstock had he been required to attend a hearing in person in this period, especially on short notice. 6. The sole purpose of the Plaintiff s request for an oral hearing is to interfere with Dr. Cooperstock s ability to meet his obligations to his employer and to create hardship for Dr. Cooperstock, as the Plaintiff has done in the past in bringing a motion without canvassing Dr. Cooperstock about his availabilities. C. MISSTATEMENT OF THE ISSUES AND DR. COOPERSTOCK S POSITION 7. The Plaintiff did seek monetary damages in its Statement of Claim. As the Plaintiff stated at paragraph 7 of its submissions, the Plaintiff is no longer claiming monetary damages. Retaining these abandoned/withdrawn claims in the Statement of Claim serves no purpose other than creating prejudice.
5 Thus, the main issue is whether these claims should be deleted from the Statement of Claim. 9. The Plaintiff appears to confuse claim with action at paragraphs 3 and 11(ii) of its submissions. Dr. Cooperstock did not allege that the Plaintiff abandoned the entire action, but rather that the Plaintiff abandoned certain claim(s) in the Statement of Claim, specifically, the claim for monetary damages. 10. Dr. Cooperstock clearly stated his position at paragraph 30 of his written submissions that he relies on Rule 402 of the Federal Court Rules by way of an analogy, as permitted by Rule 4, in support of the proposition that if a plaintiff abandons a portion of its action, it should be responsible for the costs associated with that portion. D. PREJUDICIAL AND/OR FALSE REPRESENTATIONS BY THE PLAINTIFF (i) Paragraph 28: there is no abandoned or withdrawn claim 11. The Plaintiff falsely claims at paragraph 28 of its submissions that there is no abandoned or withdrawn claim. The Amended Statement of Claim contains a claim for monetary damages, and as the Plaintiff conceded at paragraph 7, the Plaintiff is no longer pursuing this claim. Thus, the Plaintiff has abandoned and/or withdrawn its claim for monetary damages. 12. There is no reason to trust the Plaintiff to refrain from attempting to create a similar confusing at the trial as to what is being sought and what has been abandoned and/or withdrawn. This conduct of the Plaintiff underscores the importance of deleting any claim from the Statement of Claim that the Plaintiff no longer pursues.
6 - 4 - (ii) Timing of the present motion 13. Contrary to the Plaintiff s submissions at paragraph 1, Dr. Cooperstock brought the present motion in full compliance with Rules 6(3) and 51(2) of the Federal Court Rules. Since Dr. Cooperstock received no assistance from counsel in preparing the present motion, filing the motion record on January 17, 2014 was very difficult. Federal Court Rules, s. 6(3) and 51(2) (iii) Alleged refusal to consent to amendment of the Statement of Claim 14. The Plaintiff incorrectly claims at paragraph 5 of its submissions that Dr. Cooperstock refused to to consent to the Plaintiff s amendment of the Statement of Claim to reflect the merger. 15. The June 10, 2013 Order of Prothonotary Morneau, found in the court docket (Document no. #30, p. 2), confirms that counsel for the Plaintiff misremembers the events: As this remedy is not challenged on its substantial points, the plaintiffs shall be authorized pursuant to the schedule found below under point II to serve and file the Amended Statement of Claim. [Emphasis added.] (iv) Assistance by counsel 16. At paragraph 10, the Plaintiff refers to the fact that Dr. Cooperstock was assisted by counsel during examinations for discovery to suggest that Dr. Cooperstock is not self-represented. Due to his limited resources, unfortunately, Dr. Cooperstock remains unrepresented in the present proceedings, and the exam-
7 - 5 - inations for discovery were exceptional occasions where he was able to secure the assistance of counsel. (v) Delays in the proceeding 17. While Dr. Cooperstock has consistently complied with the deadlines set by the Federal Court Rules or by the Court, the same is not true for the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff failed to serve its affidavit of documents by the May 13, 2013 deadline that was set by the Prothonotary, and failed to exercise due diligence in amending its Statement of Claim to reflect the merger between United and Continental. 18. Thus, the longest delays in the present proceeding were caused by the Plaintiff s conduct, and the Plaintiff s allegations that Dr. Cooperstock is delaying the proceeding are no more than mudslinging. E. STANDARD OF REVIEW 19. Dr. Cooperstock s consistent position has been that the learned Prothonotary s Order ought to be set aside because it is clearly wrong, was based on a misapprehension of the facts, and was lacking reasons. Dr. Cooperstock also submitted that leaving the Statement of Claim unchanged will cause prejudice and confusion at the trial, as the Plaintiff has been attempting to do on the present motion. 20. Dr. Cooperstock submits that the Order of the Prothonotary is a clear case of misuse of judicial discretion: there is no possible justification for retaining abandoned and/or withdrawn claims in the Statement of Claim.
8 At paragraph 16, the Plaintiff is taking issue with Dr. Cooperstock s affidavit. The factual background set out in the affidavit is also found in a previous motion record that was dealt with by the Prothonotary (Document no. 4 in the court file), and thus the learned Prothonotary was certainly aware of these background facts. (i) Misapprehension of the facts 22. Dr. Cooperstock sought directions from the Prothonotary, asking for guidance, which is the reason that Dr. Cooperstock limited the amount of documents included; however, the Prothonotary issued an Order. 23. Dr. Cooperstock submits that the Prothonotary had no evidence before him about the conduct of the examinations for discovery, and thus was not in the position to make any findings or draw any conclusions with respect to them as he did. (ii) Lack of reasons 24. The Plaintiff misstates the law at paragraph 18 by claiming that it is settled that even lack of written reasons is not a ground of appeal. Novaphram, cited by the Plaintiff, case can be distinguished from the case at bar in the following observation: [23] The Prothonotary had ample material before her upon which to come to a decision. After all, not only did she have the written record and an oral hearing but also the outcome of three case management conferences. [...] 25. In the case at bar, the principles used by the Prothonotary to conclude that abandoned and/or withdrawn claims need not be deleted from the State-
9 - 7 - ment of Claim are unclear. It is also unclear what being satisfied with the Plaintiff s approach and position means in this context, as nothing in the Plaintiff s letter refer to the legal principles governing deleting portions of pleadings. F. THE PROTHONOTARY S ORDER IS CLEARLY WRONG (i) No rationale for retaining an abandoned and/or withdrawn claim 26. The Plaintiff does not dispute that it is no longer pursuing its claim for monetary damages. Thus, the Plaintiff has abandoned and/or withdrawn this claim, although it continues to seek other reliefs. 27. Neither the learned Prothonotary nor the Plaintiff were able to identify any reason that would justify keeping claims that have been abandoned and/or withdrawn in the Statement of Claim. The Plaintiff has been unable to point to any authority to suggest that such claims should not be deleted. (ii) Relevance and prejudice 28. Dr. Cooperstock must know what is being claimed against him in order to be able to mount a meaningful defence, and take adequate steps in the process of discovery, including a refusals motion that he must bring by February 28, 2014 as per the Prothonotary s directions. 29. As the present motion demonstrates, the Plaintiff has been playing fast and loose as to whether it has abandoned and/or withdrawn its claim for monetary damages. The Plaintiff says that it is not pursuing the claim for monetary damages in order to avoid answering certain questions on discovery, but the Plaintiff is likely to attempt to reverse its position on trial, as it is attempting to do on the present motion.
10 This is precisely the conduct that Dr. Cooperstock is asking this Honourable Court to prevent by ordering that the Statement of Claim be amended. 31. Thus, even if paragraph 31 is found to be relevant to the remaining issues, paragraph (h) of the Statement of Claim ought to be deleted. 32. Since the Plaintiff has abandoned its claim for monetary damages, the allegation at paragraph 31 that it has suffered and continues to suffer considerable damages is no longer relevant to the remedies being sought, and as such it serves the sole purpose of creating prejudice against Dr. Cooperstock, and depicting him as profiting from mischief. (iii) Rule 402 is not the basis for seeking amendment of the Statement of Claim 33. Dr. Cooperstock s position has been that retaining a claim that the Plaintiff does not wish to pursue in the Statement of Claim is inappropriate, because it is irrelevant, redundant, and prejudices the fair determination of the matter. These grounds are analogous to what is set out in Rule 221. Dr. Cooperstock has referred to Rule 402 only in the context of costs. (iv) Not pursuing a claim is not a mere narrowing issues 34. There is no doubt that formulating and narrowing issues is part of the discovery and pre-trial process. Such narrowing typically pertains to questions of fact or law (or both), as necessary to determine whether a party is entitled to the relief being sought. In the present case, however, the Plaintiff is not narrowing issues but making a far more substantial change in abandoning an entire relief sought, that of monetary damages against Dr. Cooperstock.
11 The Plaintiff has been unable to cite any authority to suggest that the Statement of Claim does not need to reflect such a substantial and material change in the nature of the action and in the remedies being sought when an entire relief, such as monetary compensation, is abandoned and/or withdrawn. G. IMBALANCE OF RESOURCES AND SLAPP (i) SLAPP 36. In a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP), brought by a massively powerful corporation against a vulnerable defendant, the plaintiff may make a claim of monetary damages in the hopes of prevailing against the defendant simply by intimidating him or burdening him with the cost of the defence. Such cost includes that of examinations for discovery on the question of alleged monetary damages. 37. The Plaintiff in the case at bar has chosen to bring two parallel proceedings against Dr. Cooperstock, even though the Quebec Superior Court could have heard all claims of the Plaintiff against him in a single proceeding. 38. The Quebec Court of Appeal, in ordering that a hearing of whether the Plaintiff s claim against the Dr. Cooperstock before the Quebec Superior Court should be dismissed as a SLAPP, held that for Dr. Cooperstock, the process itself is the punishment: [15] Le législateur a voulu l intervention du tribunal dès le début de l instance afin de remédier à l injustice alors existante, due à l inégalité des forces respectives des parties en présence. Il a constaté que cette inégalité faussait le processus judiciaire en ce que les frais de défense à encourir et la menace, même peu probable, d une condamnation à une somme élevée avait l effet nocif de faire taire les défendeurs et d empêcher la participation
12 citoyenne au débat public, essentielle entre autres à la protection de l environnement. [16] Le seul fait d intenter une poursuite-bâillon atteint pleinement cet objectif nocif, peu importe le maintien ou le rejet de l action à la fin du procès, alors que deux ou trois années se seront écoulées. Cooperstock c. United, 2013 QCCA 1670 (ii) Imbalance of resources is relevant 39. Allowing a powerful party to abandon and/or withdraw a claim for monetary damages without any cost consequences would encourage such parties to bring meritless claims, and would leave vulnerable defendants unprotected. The purpose of Rule 402 is to protect against such abuse, and deter litigants from wasting valuable judicial resources. 40. Thus, the striking imbalance of resources between the parties in the present action is a relevant consideration not only for deleting abandoned and/or withdrawn claims from the Statement of Claim to protect a vulnerable defendant, but also with respect to costs thrown way. The Plaintiff can easily afford to pursue a meritless claim for monetary damages, but Dr. Cooperstock cannot. H. COSTS 41. Dr. Cooperstock submits that in addition to the reasons set out in the motion record, no costs ought to be awarded against him even if he is not successful on the present motion, because the Plaintiff has been less then forthright both about the conduct of Dr. Cooperstock and about its own position as to whether the claim for monetary damages has been abandoned and/or withdrawn.
13
DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY
Court File No.: T-2084-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIR LINES, INC. and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiffs and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY Dated: January 18,
More informationUNITED AIRLINES, INC. and JEREMY COOPERSTOCK ORDER AND REASONS
Date: 20140703 Docket: T-2084-12 Citation: 2014 FC 645 Montréal, Quebec, July 3, 2014 PRESENT: Prothonotary Richard Morneau BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant ORDER
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA File no. 33114 (ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF QUÉBEC) BETWEEN: THE GLOBE AND MAIL, A DIVISION OF CTV GLOBEMEDIA PUBLISHING INC. APPLICANT (Petitioner in the
More informationI. Plaintiff is seeking a remedy not pleaded in the Amended Statement of Claim
Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock 436 Strathcona Ave. Westmount, QC H3Y 2X1 jcooperstock@gmail.com January 12, 2017 Administrator Federal Court of Canada Thomas D Arcy McGee Building 90 Sparks Street, 5th floor Ottawa
More informationSeptember 1, 2015 Le 1 er septembre 2015 DISCLOSURE
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CABINET DU PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS OPERATIONAL MANUAL MANUEL DES OPÉRATIONS DE POURSUITES PUBLIQUES TYPE OF DOCUMENT TYPE DE DOCUMENT : Policy Politique CHAPTER
More informationWRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE RESPONDENT: REPLY TO RESPONSE OF THE MINISTER OF HEAL TH OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
PATENTED MEDICINE PRICES REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF the Patent Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-4, as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (" Respondent" ) and the medicine " Soliris" WRITTEN
More informationIRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN
IRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN MISE EN GARDE Le Barreau de Montréal organise de nombreuses activités et conférences à l'intention de ses membres. Certains conférenciers acceptent gracieusement que le Barreau
More informationPotential Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Legislation
PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE LE CENTRE POUR LA DEFENSE DE L INTERET PUBLIC ONE Nicholas Street, Suite 1204, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 7B7 Tel: (613) 562-4002. Fax: (613) 562-0007. e-mail: piac@piac.ca.
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09 BEFORE: J. Josefo: Vice-Chair HEARING: May 13, 2009 at Ottawa Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 16, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2009 ONWSIAT 1450
More informationIRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN
IRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN MISE EN GARDE Le Barreau de Montréal organise de nombreuses activités et conférences à l'intention de ses membres. Certains conférenciers acceptent gracieusement que le Barreau
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: PEI Protestant Children s Trust and Province of PEI and S. Marshall 2014 PESC 6 Date:20140225 Docket: S1-GS-20889 Registry: Charlottetown Between: And: And:
More informationTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KELEN LETWLED KASAHUN TESSMA (AYELE) - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
Date: 20031002 Docket: IMM-5652-02 Citation: 2003 FC 1126 Ottawa, Ontario, this 2 nd day of October, 2003 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KELEN BETWEEN: LETWLED KASAHUN TESSMA (AYELE) Applicant - and
More informationSUPERIOR. (Civil Division) and. and. and. and. vs.
CANADA SUPERIOR (Civil Division) COURT PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL No: 500-17-074743-124 UNITED AIR LINES, INC., a legal person, duly constituted according to law, having its principal place
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationCommon Code of Professional Conduct for all Counsel appearing before the International Criminal Tribunals Nuremberg 2017
The International Meetings of the Defence Common Code of Professional Conduct for all Counsel appearing before the International Criminal Tribunals Nuremberg 2017 Lawyers shall at all times maintain the
More informationEmployment Tribunal Rules: review by Mr Justice Underhill - response form
Employment Tribunal Rules: review by Mr Justice Underhill - response form The Department may, in accordance with the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information, make available, on public request,
More information(SOCIÉTÉ NOMINALE) 1980 SHERBROOKE ST. WEST, SUITE 800 TEL: (514) MONTREAL, QUEBEC FAX: (514) CONTRACT
AVOCATS BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS (SOCIÉTÉ NOMINALE) 1980 SHERBROOKE ST. WEST, SUITE 800 TEL: (514) 937-9445 MONTREAL, QUEBEC FAX: (514) 937-2618 CANADA, H3H 1E8 dcohen@canadavisa.com CONTRACT (CIC Express
More informationBefore: JUSTICE ANDREW BAKER (In Private) - and - ANONYMISATION APPLIES
If this Transcript is to be reported or published, there is a requirement to ensure that no reporting restriction will be breached. This is particularly important in relation to any case involving a sexual
More informationOBJECTION YOUR HONOUR!
OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR! ROBERT S. HARRISON JENNIFER McALEER FASKEN MARTINEAU DuMOULIN LLP THE BASICS What is an Objection? By definition an objection is an interruption. It should only be made when it is
More informationHassan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Hassan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Between Ali Abdi Hassan, applicant, and The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, respondent [1999] F.C.J. No. 1359 Court File No. IMM-5440-98
More informationActs I assent. RAJKESWUR PURRYAG 27 July 2012 President of the Republic
346 Acts 2012 THE CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER ACT 2012 Act No. 18 of 2012 I assent RAJKESWUR PURRYAG 27 July 2012 President of the Republic Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Delegation of powers
More informationPRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. Public Document
ICC-01/04-111 06-02-2006 1/11 UM 1/11 Cour Pénale Internationale International Criminal No. icc-oi/04 Datc: 6 February 2006 Original: English PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Claude Jorda, Presiding Judge
More informationFinancial protection in case of judicial proceedings for Municipal Council members and Officers. Me Yvon Denault
Financial protection in case of judicial proceedings for Municipal Council members and Officers Me Yvon Denault ydenault@belangersauve.com INTRODUCTION 2 History and origin of present scheme protecting
More informationComments on the Consultation Draft of the Capital Markets Stability Act ( CMSA )
Kurtis T. Kulman Senior Vice President, Law Direct:(403) 213-3178 Fax:(403) 213-3184 Email:kkulman@walton.com Assistant: Janice Malainey Executive Legal Assistant Direct:(403) 213-3181 Fax:(403) 213-3184
More informationRULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS BULLETIN
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS BULLETIN July 2009 SUMMARY [The information below is provided as a service by Shillingtons LLP and is not intended to be legal advice. Those seeking additional information
More informationNOTICE OF THE CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE HONDA ACCORD AND 2009 ACURA TSX CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF THE CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE 2008-2009 HONDA ACCORD AND 2009 ACURA TSX CLASS ACTION Read this Notice Carefully as it May Affect Your Rights TO: Canadian
More informationThe Honourable Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer RALPH PROPHÈTE. and REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
Date: 20080312 Docket: IMM-3077-07 Citation: 2008 FC 331 Ottawa, Ontario, March 12, 2008 PRESENT: The Honourable Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer BETWEEN: RALPH PROPHÈTE and Applicant THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
More informationGUIDE OF PROFESSIONAL COURTESY. and Informal Procedure for Receiving and Treating Breaches to the Guide of Professional Courtesy
GUIDE OF PROFESSIONAL COURTESY and Informal Procedure for Receiving and Treating Breaches to the Guide of Professional Courtesy Table of contents Introduction 1 Guide of Professional Courtesy 2 Preface
More informationCase 4:02-cv Document 538 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:02-cv-01486 Document 538 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75484 Christopher T. Heffelfinger (118058 BERMAN
More informationAVOCATS BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS
AVOCATS BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS (SOCIÉTÉ NOMINALE) 1980 SHERBROOKE ST. WEST, SUITE 800 TEL: (514) 937-9445 MONTREAL, QUEBEC FAX: (514) 937-2618 CANADA, H3H 1E8 dcohen@canadavisa.com CONTRACT (Application
More informationISSUES IN CASE MANAGEMENT. The Case Management Conference. Commercial Court CPD and CLE at Monash 25 February 2010.
ISSUES IN CASE MANAGEMENT The Case Management Conference Commercial Court CPD and CLE at Monash 25 February 2010 Jennifer Davies 1 The overriding objective of case management, and of the changes introduced
More informationINTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
ISRMUN 2015 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT I. General Description The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a permanent, international tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity,
More informationReport of the. Supreme Court. Criminal Practice Committee Term
Report of the Supreme Court Criminal Practice Committee 2007-2009 Term February 17, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Proposed Rule Amendments Recommended for Adoption... 1 1. Post-Conviction Relief Rules...
More informationCLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OPINION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: March 14, 2013 Docket No. 33,280 IN THE MATTER OF GENE N. CHAVEZ, ESQUIRE AN ATTORNEY SUSPENDED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW BEFORE
More informationBarristers and Solicitors. Leo F. Longo Direct: February 1, 2017 Our File No
Aird & Berlis LLP Barristers and Solicitors Leo F. Longo Direct: 416.865.7778 E-mail: llongo@airdberlis.com February 1, 2017 Our File No. 135231 To whom it may concern Dear Sir/Madame: Re: The Town of
More informationWESTERN AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION BEST PRACTICE PAPER 02/2010 COMMUNICATON AND CONFERRAL IN CIVIL LITIGATION
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION BEST PRACTICE PAPER 02/2010 COMMUNICATON AND CONFERRAL IN CIVIL LITIGATION Introduction 1. This paper on Communication and Conferral in Civil Litigation is one of a series
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
The Tribunal s Order is subject to appeal to the High Court (Administrative Court) by the Respondent. The Order remains in force pending the High Court s decision on the appeal. SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$15.20 WINDHOEK - 7 November 2014 No. 5608 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICES No. 227 Amendment of Rules of High Court of Namibia: High Court Act, 1990... 1
More informationNumber 45 of 2001 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (PART-TIME WORK) ACT, 2001 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1. Preliminary and General
Number 45 of 2001 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (PART-TIME WORK) ACT, 2001 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General Section 1. Short title, collective citation and construction. 2. Commencement.
More informationCivil Procedure Act 2010
Examinable excerpts of Civil Procedure Act 2010 as at 2 October 2018 1 Purposes CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY (1) The main purposes of this Act are (a) to reform and modernise the laws, practice, procedure and
More informationRemarks at Ceremony for Opening of Judicial Year
Remarks at Ceremony for Opening of Judicial Year by Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji President, International Criminal Court Friday, 18 January 2019 Chers Collègues et amis, Au nom de tous les juges, des responsables
More informationThe European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour
The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour The European Ombudsman en The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour The European Ombudsman European Communities, 2005 All rights reserved. Reproduction
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA
PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA November 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE TO PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT
More informationGOTTERSON JA: On the 27th of September 2013, the applicant, James Boyd Thompson,
[2015] QCA 10 COURT OF APPEAL CARMODY CJ GOTTERSON JA MORRISON JA Appeal No 5483 of 2014 SC No 9148 of 2013 JAMES BOYD THOMPSON Applicant v CAVALIER KING CHARLES SPANIEL RESCUE (QLD) INC LAURENCE JOHN
More informationB e f o r e : LORD JUSTICE AULD LORD JUSTICE WARD and LORD JUSTICE ROBERT WALKER
Neutral Citation No: [2002] EWCA Civ 44 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION B e f o r e : Case No. 2001/0437 Royal Courts of Justice
More informationThe Small Claims Act, 2016
1 SMALL CLAIMS, 2016 c S-50.12 The Small Claims Act, 2016 being Chapter S-50.12 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2016 (effective January 1, 2018). *NOTE: Pursuant to subsection 33(1) of The Interpretation
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018
PART 47 RULES HON. PAUL A. GOETZ 80 Centre Street, Room 320 New York, New York 10013 Part Clerk: Jeffrey S. Wilson Phone: 646-386-3743 Fax: 212-618-0528 Court Attorney: Vera Zolotaryova Phone: 646-386-4384
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More informationGuernsey case management and civil proceedings
JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE GUERNSEY BRIEFING August 2015 Guernsey case management and civil proceedings Proactive case management is a concept that pervades modern Guernsey civil procedure. This
More informationDEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY (Defendant s motion for testimony via videoconference)
Court File No.: T-2084-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY (Defendant s motion for testimony via videoconference)
More informationRESOLUTION DIGEST
RESOLUTION 04-02-04 DIGEST Requests for Admissions: Service of Supplemental Requests Amends Code of Civil Procedure section 2033 to allow parties to propound a supplemental request for admission. RESOLUTIONS
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE B241048
Filed 8/28/14 Cooper v. Wedbush Morgan Securities CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
Court File No. 842/12 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: 2145850 ONTARIO LIMITED, o/a Highland Bus Services, BARR BUS LINES LIMITED, CLARK BUS & MARINA LIMITED, HEALEY TRANSPORTATION LIMITED,
More informationZynergy Solar Projects & Services Pvt Ltd v Phoenix Solar Pte Ltd
This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore
More informationFACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM / FORMULAIRE D'ACHEMINEMENT PARTELECOPIEUR
Federal Court Cour federale FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM / FORMULAIRE D'ACHEMINEMENT PARTELECOPIEUR BENOIT LABELLE Courts Administration Service / Service administratifs des tribunaux judiciaires Registry
More informationRULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS
RULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS 82.01 (1) In this rule, unless the context requires otherwise: "appeal" includes an application for leave to appeal and a crossappeal; (appel)
More informationFACTUM OF THE APPLICANT
Court File No. 12821-15 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N : TANNER CURRIE -and- Applicant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, and CHRISTOPHER LABRECHE Respondents FACTUM
More informationPOLICY STATEMENT. Topic: False Claims Act Date Effective: 10/13/08. X Revised New Section: Corporate Compliance Number: 10.05
The Arc of Ulster-Greene 471 Albany Avenue Kingston, NY 12401 845-331-4300 Fax: 331-4931 www.thearcug.org POLICY STATEMENT Topic: False Claims Act Date Effective: 10/13/08 X Revised New Section: Corporate
More informationSupreme Court New South Wales
Supreme Court New South Wales Case Name: Munsie v Dowling (No. 7) Medium Neutral Citation: Munsie v Dowling (No. 7) [2015] NSWSC 1832 Hearing Date(s): 30 November 2015 Date of Orders: 4 December 2015 Date
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. Reasons for Judgment Respecting Costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Re: Section 29 of the Court Order Enforcement Act and the Registration of a Foreign Judgment Against John Tolman, Mrs. John Tolman, Bob Alpen and Mrs. Bob Alpen
More informationOrder F05-25 MINISTRY OF HEALTH. Errol Nadeau, Adjudicator. August 10, 2005
Order F05-25 MINISTRY OF HEALTH Errol Nadeau, Adjudicator August 10, 2005 Quicklaw Cite: [2005] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 33 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/orderf05-33.pdf Office URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Date: 19981027 Docket: 22426 Registry: Kamloops IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: AND: JOHN MARTIN SWAGAR and MARTINA PAYNE-SWAGAR PIERRE HUBERTUS VEK, MARIA WILHELMINA VEK and CITY OF
More informationMUTUMBA, Fahad Huthy. and REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT. [1] In a situation of choice wherein one could remove oneself or extricate oneself, yet,
Date: 20090107 Docket: IMM-2668-08 Citation: 2009 FC 19 Ottawa, Ontario, January 7, 2009 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore BETWEEN: MUTUMBA, Fahad Huthy and Applicant THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
More informationIN THE SUPREIVIE COURT OF OHIO. Case No.: On Appeal From the Court of Appeals Eleventh Appellate District Geauga County, Ohio
^^^ ^ 7n, ^"^ ^Y^^ ^^ ^ IN THE SUPREIVIE COURT OF OHIO Case No.: 2013-0505 On Appeal From the Court of Appeals Eleventh Appellate District Geauga County, Ohio HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee
More informationVIANINI LAVORI S.P.A. v THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY - [1992] HKCU 0463
1 VIANINI LAVORI S.P.A. v THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY - [1992] HKCU 0463 High Court (in Chambers) Kaplan, J. Construction List No. 4 of 1992 6 March 1992, 27 May 1992 Kaplan, J. This matter raises
More informationBERMUDA RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BERMUDA BX 1 / 1965
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BERMUDA BX 1 / 1965 [made under section 9 of the Court of Appeal Act 1964 and brought into operation on 2 August 1965] TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationLOCAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES DISTRICT COURT DIVISION
LOCAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES DISTRICT COURT DIVISION THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT BLADEN BRUNSWICK COLUMBUS DISTRICT COURT JUDGES OFFICE 110-A COURTHOUSE SQUARE WHITEVILLE,
More informationCOMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD IN PRETORIA)
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD IN PRETORIA) Case No: 74/CR/Jun08 In the matter between: Astral Operations Ltd Elite Breeding Farms First Applicant Second Applicant and The Competition Commission
More informationSummary of the Appeal Judgment in the case. The Prosecutor vs Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo. Read by Presiding Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert,
Summary of the Appeal Judgment in the case The Prosecutor vs Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo Read by Presiding Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert, The Hague, 8 June 2018 1. The Appeals Chamber is delivering today
More informationInquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation
Inquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Inquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation
More informationActions must be set down for trial within two years of being defended.
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, EAST REGION OFFICE OF THE MASTER HOW DOES THE NEW PRE-TRIAL PROCESS WORK? Actions must be set down for trial within two years of being defended. The two year deadline can only
More informationJudicial Review Consultation Ministry of Justice 4 th Floor, Postal Point Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ
Judicial Review Consultation Ministry of Justice 4 th Floor, Postal Point 4.38 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ By email: admin.justice@justice.gsi.gov.uk 1 November 2013 NCVO submission the Ministry
More informationTemporary Resident Permits: Limits to protection for trafficked persons
Canadian Council for Refugees Conseil canadien pour les réfugiés Temporary Resident Permits: Limits to protection for trafficked persons In May 2006, the Canadian government issued guidelines for temporary
More informationLitigating Bad Faith: Why Winning the Battle May Not Win the Protest
BNA Document Bid Protests Litigating Bad Faith: Why Winning the Battle May Not Win the Protest By Andrew E. Shipley Andrew E. Shipley is a partner in Perkins Coie LLP's Government Contracts Group. In a
More informationHong Kong Civil Procedure Notes
Hong Kong Civil Procedure Notes 2017 1 st Edition PCLLConversion.com Copyright PCLLConversion.com 2017 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 6 A. How to use Conversion Notes... 6 B. Abbreviations...
More informationCONTRACT LAW (2) Il est précisé que le thème «CONTRACT LAW» est abordé à travers 2 fiches, cette fiche étant la seconde. I. VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT
CONTRACT LAW (2) Il est précisé que le thème «CONTRACT LAW» est abordé à travers 2 fiches, cette fiche étant la seconde. Plan : I. VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT II. LEGALITY OF THE SUBJECT MATTER III. REALITY
More informationTHE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE ARBITRATION ACT (CHAPTER 10)
THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE ARBITRATION ACT (CHAPTER 10) (Original Enactment: Act 37 of 2001) REVISED EDITION 2002 (31st July 2002) Prepared and Published by THE LAW REVISION COMMISSION UNDER
More informationUNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE CHINACAST EDUCATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. CV 12-4621-JFW (PLAx NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION To: All persons
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ALISON FINLAY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-08-0786 WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending
More informationPRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
ICC-01/05-01/13-73 09-01-2014 1/6 EO PT Cour Pénale // ^ - ^ \ Internationale International Criminal Court ^^^^>^ Original: English No.: ICC-01/05-01/13 Date: 9 January 2014 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II Before:
More informationStandard Operating Procedures. The Honorable Eleanor L. Bush
J. Bush SOP 03/20/2014 Standard Operating Procedures for practice before, and in the chambers of, The Honorable Eleanor L. Bush I. CONTACT WITH CHAMBERS 440 Ross Street, Suite 5019.1 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENT, FIRST DISTRICT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENT, FIRST DISTRICT Yuling Zhan, ) No: 04 M1 23226 Plaintiff ) V. ) Napleton Buick Inc. ) Defendant ) OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF
More information[2005] VCAT Arrow International Australia Pty Ltd Indevelco Pty Ltd Perpetual Nominees Ltd as custodian of the Colonial First State Income Fund
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT REFERENCE NO. D181/2004 CATCHWORDS Requests for Further and Better Particulars and further discovery nature of this
More informationBureau régional du Nord 2 iéme étage, édifice Nova Plaza iéme rue CP 2052 Yellowknife TN-O X1A 2P5
Department of Justice Canada Northern Regional Office 2 nd Floor, Nova Plaza 5019 52 nd Street PO Box 2052 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P5 Ministère de la Justice Canada Bureau régional du Nord 2 iéme étage, édifice
More informationHOSPIRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION. and THE KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Date: 20150417 Docket: T-396-13 Toronto, Ontario, April 17, 2015 PRESENT: Madam Prothonotary Martha Milczynski BETWEEN: HOSPIRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION Plaintiff and THE KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF RHEUMATOLOGY
More informationSeptember 1, 2015 Le 1 er septembre 2015 FIREARMS
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CABINET DU PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS OPERATIONAL MANUAL MANUEL DES OPÉRATIONS DE POURSUITES PUBLIQUES TYPE OF DOCUMENT TYPE DE DOCUMENT : Policy Politique CHAPTER
More informationERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS
ERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS SECTION I - INTRODUCTORY RULES Scope of Application Article 1 1. Pursuant to Article 5, paragraph
More informationNew Mexico Medicaid False Claims Act
New Mexico Medicaid False Claims Act (N.M. Stat. Ann. 27-14-1 to 15) i 27-14-1. Short title This [act] [27-14-1 to 27-14-15 NMSA 1978] may be cited as the "Medicaid False Claims Act". 27-14-2. Purpose
More informationPractice Directions Directives de procédure
Practice Directions Directives de procédure Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal Tribunal d appel de la sécurité professionnelle et de l assurance contre les accidents du travail PRACTICE DIRECTIONS
More informationIN THE MATTER of WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE (No. 1) IN THE MATTER of JEREMY JAMES McGUIRE, Barrister and Solicitor
1 IN THE NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 [2011] NZLCDT 28 LCDT 030/09 IN THE MATTER of WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE (No. 1) AND IN THE MATTER
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 318 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017 DEFENDANTS EXHIBIT B.
EFENANTS EXHIBIT B 1 of 17 18 MEMORANUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE EFENANTS MOTION TO ISMISS THE COMPLAINT, ATE JUNE 3, 2014 [18 33] FILE: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/03/2014 INEX NO.
More informationUniform Class Proceedings Act
8-1 Uniform Law Conference of Canada Uniform Class Proceedings Act 8-2 Table of Contents PART I: DEFINITIONS 1 Definitions PART II: CERTIFICATION 2 Plaintiff s class proceeding 3 Defendant s class proceeding
More informationThe Perils of Dealing with Self Represented Litigants: Common Sense Steps to Reach Common Ground
The Perils of Dealing with Self Represented Litigants: Common Sense Steps to Reach Common Ground Rob Moss and Jay Skukowski This presentation will focus on common pitfalls to avoid when dealing with a
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 20, 2005
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 20, 2005 CLAUDE L. GLASS v. GEORGE UNDERWOOD, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 3-436-04 Wheeler A. Rosenbalm,
More information- 2 - for contribution and indemnity for any and all claims paid by Air France arising from the aircraft incident. [4] In the related class action ( t
CITATION: SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE v. GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY et al, 2010 ONSC 432 COURT FILE NO.: 07-CV-337564PD3 DATE: 2010/01/14 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: BEFORE: SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE
More informationSupreme Court of the Kingdom of Loquntia
Special Publication In The Supreme Court of the Kingdom of Loquntia THE RULES OF THE COURT OF HIS MAJESTY THE SOVEREIGN Enacted R.D. 179, February 28, 2015 The Library of Blue Ink Department of Auditing
More informationRuling On the Application to Strike Out the Re-Amended Claim Form and Statement of Case
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO In the High Court of Justice Claim No. CV2015-01091 CHANTAL RIGUAD Claimant AND ANTHONY LAMBERT Defendant Appearances: Claimant: Defendant: Alexia Romero instructed
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JUNE 5, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2013-CA-000333-MR ROBERT PETTIT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM ROCKCASTLE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE DAVID A.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Probate Court of Nova Scotia Citation: Ahern Estate (Re), 2018 NSSC 294
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Probate Court of Nova Scotia Citation: Ahern Estate (Re), 2018 NSSC 294 Date: 20181122 Docket: Hfx. No. 471092 Probate No. 60756 Registry: Halifax Between: John K. Ahern v.
More information