DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY
|
|
- Corey Bryan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Court File No.: T FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIR LINES, INC. and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiffs and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY Dated: January 18, 2013 DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK 392 Grosvenor Street Westmount, Québec H3Z 2M2 Tel: jcooperstock@gmail.com Defendant / Moving Party
2 TO: GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP 1 Place Ville Marie, 37th Floor Montreal, Quebec H3B 3P4 Me Hélène D Iorio Tel: Fax: Me Lee A. Johnson Tel: Fax: Solicitor for the Plaintiffs, United Air Lines, Inc., and Continental Airlines, Inc.
3 Court File No.: T FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIR LINES, INC. and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiffs and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant REPLY OF THE MOVING PARTY, DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Table of Contents A. UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS, NOT SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE... 2 B. PLAINTIFFS HAVE UNNECESSARILY INSTITUTED TWO PROCEEDINGS.. 3 C. CONDUCT OF COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFFS... 4 D. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING STATEMENT OF DEFENCE... 6 (i) Applicability of Rule (ii) Alleged prejudice to the Plaintiffs... 8 (iii) Dr. Cooperstock has reasonable explanation for the delay... 9 E. CASE MANAGEMENT F. COSTS... 13
4 - 2 - A. UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS, NOT SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE 1. The Plaintiffs have made several unproven and misguided allegations of facts in their submissions that are not supported by any evidence on the record. A few examples of these are provided below. 2. Dr. Cooperstock denies that he redesigned the website Untied.com between March 3, 2012 and April 9, 2012, and submits that there is no evidence on the record in support of this allegation. Plaintiffs Representations, para Dr. Cooperstock denies that he made no changes to the website Untied.com after he was approached by the Plaintiffs. Indeed, well before the Statement of Claim was served, Dr. Cooperstock did add a disclaimer (This is not the website of United Airlines) and a pop-up window to clearly distinguish Untied.com from the Plaintiffs website in response to the Plaintiffs concerns as an additional, possibly unnecessary, safety measure to avoid any possible confusion. Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit, Ex. B and C Motion Record, Tabs 2B-2C Plaintiffs Representations, paras. 5 & The Plaintiffs have chosen not to cross-examine Dr. Cooperstock on his January 7, 2013 affidavit. Instead, the Plaintiffs attempt to rely on inadmissible hearsay contained in a newspaper article. Even if the Toronto Star article were admissible, it supports Dr. Cooperstock s account of the events: the article was published on November 30, 2012, and it refers to a redesign last year, that is, in the year of 2011, and not in 2012 as the Plaintiffs claim. Lastoria Affidavit, Ex. F 5. Dr. Cooperstock asks that the Honourable Court draw adverse inference from the Plaintiffs failure to adduce evidence in support of their allegations and/or to cross-examine him on his January 7, 2013 affidavit.
5 - 3 - B. PLAINTIFFS HAVE UNNECESSARILY INSTITUTED TWO PROCEEDINGS 6. Dr. Cooperstock would like to draw attention to the evasive response by the Plaintiffs to Dr. Cooperstock s submission that the Plaintiffs have unnecessarily instituted two proceedings against him. Defendant s Representations, para. 31 Plaintiffs Representations, para. 6 Motion Record, P92 7. This point is relevant to the present motion, because the Plaintiffs and/or their counsels have created conflicting deadlines for Dr. Cooperstock, and there is a legitimate concern that without close monitoring by the Honourable Court, they will attempt to do so in the future. 8. Dr. Cooperstock submits that the Plaintiffs could have pursued the present action for trade-mark and copyright infringement in the Quebec Superior Court, which has concurrent jurisdiction over these subject matters. Indeed, the Plaintiffs could have instituted a single proceeding before the Quebec Superior Court, and could have put forward all their complaints about the Untied.com website in a single action. 9. The Plaintiffs have offered no explanation for their choice to pursue their claim for trade-mark and copyright infringement in a separate action and in a different court, given that they commenced at the same time an action against Dr. Cooperstock before the Quebec Superior Court, and that court has jurisdiction over all subject matters in issue. 10. It is submitted that the Plaintiffs failure to address this point supports the conclusion that the Plaintiffs reason for unnecessarily instituting two separate proceedings is to create additional burden on Dr. Cooperstock s limited resources, to create conflicting deadlines in parallel proceedings, and ultimately, to prejudice Dr. Cooperstock s ability to defend himself.
6 - 4 - C. CONDUCT OF COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFFS 11. In spite of the Plaintiffs attempt to whitewash the conduct of their counsel toward Dr. Cooperstock, as demonstrated below, Me D Iorio failed to act reasonably and professionally in her dealings with Dr. Cooperstock. It is further submitted that her conduct, which has substantially contributed to the need to bring the present motion, ought to be considered with respect to costs. (i) Failing to respond to request concerning electronic service 12. On December 13, 2012, Dr. Cooperstock wrote to Me D Iorio, and sought her consent to accepting Electronic Legal Service as per the Electronic Legal Service and Electronic Filing in the Federal Court (Amended July 21, 2009) directive. Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit, para. 17, Ex. L Motion Record, Tab 2L, P Me D Iorio has never responded to Dr. Cooperstock s request. Moreover, she has failed to respond to Dr. Cooperstock s request even though this matter was raised in the present motion. The Plaintiffs have ignored this matter, and provided no explanation for Me D Iorio s failure to respond. Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit, para. 18 Defendant s Representations, paras Motion Record, Tab 2, P8 Motion Record, P95 (ii) Failure to ask about the reasons for the request for an extension 14. The Plaintiffs complain in their submissions that Dr.Cooperstock did not provide reasons for his request for an extension. Plaintiffs Representations, paras. 8, 10, 12, 14, 42, 44, 56(iii) 15. If Dr. Cooperstock s reasons for asking for an extension were a concern to the Plaintiffs, it is perplexing why Me D Iorio did not inquire about them, and it supports the conclusion that Me D Iorio was engaging in sharp practice.
7 - 5 - (iii) Falsely denying knowledge of death in family 16. On December 21, 2012, Dr. Cooperstock delivered a letter of complaint to Me Dorion about the conduct of Me D Iorio. Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit, paras. 23, Ex. P Motion Record, Tab 2P, P As the Plaintiffs conceded, a copy of the letter was sent to Me D Iorio during regular business hours, around 3:00 pm, by . The letter was marked URGENT and its subject stated Complaint concerning the conduct of Me Hélène D Iorio in bold font. Plaintiffs Representations, para. 22 Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit Ex. P Motion Record, Tab 2P, P It is difficult to believe that an attorney who receives a copy of a complaint about her conduct would not immediately read it. It is even more difficult to believe that Me Dorion would not contact Me D Iorio about the letter, which was marked as urgent, upon its receipt. The Plaintiffs made no representations as to any circumstance that might have prevented Me D Iorio from reviewing the letter on the day of its receipt, that is, December 21, In these circumstances, it is submitted that it is far more probable that Me D Iorio read the December 21, 2012 letter before January 3, 2013 than the Plaintiffs claim that she did not; thus, on a balance of probabilities, Me D Iorio did know about the death in Dr. Cooperstock s family before January 3, (iv) Failure to cooperate with respect to the extension 20. Whatever the case might have been in December 2012, the evidence shows that by January 3, 2013, Me D Iorio was aware of the details concerning the death in Dr. Cooperstock s family. Nevertheless, Me D Iorio continued to withhold her consent to an extension. Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit, Ex. T" Motion Record, Tab 2T, P73
8 It is worth noting that Me D Iorio had reasonable alternatives to flatly refusing to cooperate with respect to Dr. Cooperstock s request for an extension: (a) Me D Iorio could have followed the practice of the Attorney General of Canada and consented to a 15 day extension, and leave it to the Registrar or the Court to interpret it in light of Rule 6(3). Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit, Ex. N Motion Record, Tab 2N, P44 (b) Me D Iorio could have offered to consent to a motion for an extension should Dr. Cooperstock choose to bring one. This would have relieved her of any concern about the interpretation of Rules. However, as the record demonstrates, Me D Iorio chose the least cooperative and most confrontational avenue to respond to Dr. Cooperstock s reasonable request for an extension. D. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING STATEMENT OF DEFENCE 22. Oddly, although the Plaintiffs argue at great length that Dr. Cooperstock does not meet the legal test for an extension, they are only asking the Court to set a date for the filing of the Statement of Defence; in particular, the Plaintiffs are not asking that the Honourable Court dismiss the motion for an extension. Plaintiffs Representations, paras. 45, 53, and This inconsistency in the Plaintiffs position underscores the unreasonableness of the Plaintiffs refusal to cooperate and consent earlier to the sought extension, before the present motion was served and filed. 24. Nevertheless, Dr. Cooperstock has no choice but to respond to the arguments presented by the Plaintiffs, because of their relevance to case management and costs.
9 - 7 - (i) Applicability of Rule Dr. Cooperstock respectfully disagrees with the Plaintiffs about any ambiguity with respect to Rule 6(3). The submissions below are provided to assist the Honourable Court, should it decide to specifically address this point in order to provide guidance to litigants. 26. The effect of Rule 6(3) is to delete from the calendar and ignore, for the purpose of computation of time under the Rules, the days falling within the Christmas recess. 27. The deadline for filing a Statement of Defence is prescribed by Rule 204. Thus, it is a deadline under these Rules within the meaning of Rule 6(3). Rule 7 permits parties to extend, by consent, a 30-day deadline for filing a Statement of Defence by 15 days, to 45 days. The extended deadline of 45 days is still a time prescribed by the Rules, and hence falls within the scope of Rule 6(3). 28. The case at bar can be distinguished from Telecommunications Workers Union v. Telus Mobility, which dealt with a deadline set by the Federal Court Act, and not by the Rules. 29. The case at bar is also different from Canadian Steel Producers Association v. Commissioner of Customs, which dealt with Rule 6(1) and implicitly s. 26 of the Interpretation Act. The present case, however, concerns Rule 6(3), which provides specific provisions about excluding the Christmas recess from the computation of time. 30. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that Rule 6(3) applies also to deadlines that are extended by consent pursuant to Rule 7.
10 - 8 - (ii) Alleged prejudice to the Plaintiffs 31. The only evidence tendered by the Plaintiffs in support of their dubious claim that they may be prejudiced by a delay of two weeks is a printout from Dr. Cooperstock s Untied.com website, which the Plaintiffs clearly misinterpret. Lastoria Affidavit, Ex. E Plaintiffs Representations, paras It is not uncommon for passengers who were mistreated by the Plaintiffs to post a copy of their correspondence with the Plaintiffs on Untied.com in order to draw public attention to it. There is no evidence to suggest that the Plaintiffs did not receive correspondence from their passengers, and that passengers contacted Untied.com instead of contacting the Plaintiffs. 33. On the contrary, as the Attempted column Exhibit E of the Lastoria Affidavit reveals, both Ms. Rabinovitch and Mr. Moubayed made a variety of attempts to communicate with the Plaintiffs: spoke to employee at airport/flight, complained by telephone, complained by letter, and complained by . Ms. Rabinovitch also contacted the media. Lastoria Affidavit, Ex. E 34. Unfortunately, as is typical of the modus operandi of the Plaintiffs, these passengers likely received no satisfaction from their communications with the Plaintiffs, and thus they resorted to posting a copy of their correspondence with the Plaintiffs on Untied.com. 35. Hence, Dr. Cooperstock respectfully submits that there is no evidence before the Honourable Court to support the Plaintiffs allegation that the Untied.com website confuses customers of the Plaintiffs and/or that the Plaintiffs suffer any prejudice from a two-week delay in the filing of the Statement of Defence.
11 - 9 - (iii) Dr. Cooperstock has reasonable explanation for the delay 36. As a preliminary matter, Dr. Cooperstock submits that he has to satisfy the Honourable Court, and not the Plaintiffs, that he has a reasonable explanation for the delay. The Plaintiffs and/or their counsel have taken no interest in Dr. Cooperstock s reasons for seeking an extension until January 3, 2013, that is, twenty-seven (27) days after the first request was made. Thus, they cannot blame Dr. Cooperstock for their own failure to inquire about his reasons. Plaintiffs Representations, para Dr. Cooperstock s explanation for his delay is a combination of three factors: death in his family, the Plaintiffs choice to unnecessarily commence two proceedings against Dr. Cooperstock in two different courts, and inability to obtain legal advice about the subject matter of the action due to the holiday season. The impact of these factors on Dr. Cooperstock s ability to prepare a Statement of Defence must be considered in their totality, and not individually as the Plaintiffs propose. Notice of Motion, p. 2, para. 4 Motion Record, Tab Dr. Cooperstock and his wife were notified on December 7, 2012 that his wife s 91-year-old grandmother was dying. It is a common human experience that the dying of a family member is an emotional turmoil that impedes one s ability to concentrate on other matters and to think logically; it is often more difficult than the period after the funeral. Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit, Ex. E Motion Record, Tab 2E, P It is difficult to understand the Plaintiffs argument that Dr. Cooperstock seeking an extension before the actual passing away of his relative puts into question his reasons for seeking the extension. Plaintiffs Representations, para. 42
12 Dr. Cooperstock did what a diligent litigant can do in such a situation: within a few hours after receiving the news about his wife s grandmother, he wrote to Me D Iorio to seek her consent to an extension. It is submitted that his reasons for seeking the extension are corroborated by the evidence. Dr. Cooperstock Affidavit, para. 12 Motion Record, Tab 2, P7 41. By instituting two proceedings on the same day (November 19, 2012), the Plaintiffs have created a conflict between the deadline for filing the Statement of Defence in the present proceeding, and the deadline for responding to the Quebec Action. 42. On December 18, 2012, Me Bantey, counsel for the Plaintiffs in the Quebec Action, proposed an unreasonably tight schedule for the proceeding that would have likely interfered with Dr. Cooperstock s ability to defend himself in the present action. Unfortunately, Me Bantey refused to agree to the schedule proposed Dr. Cooperstock on December 20, 2012, and the Plaintiffs chose not to include a copy of that correspondence in their responding record. Plaintiffs Representations, para The Quebec Action is less complex than the present case. Indeed, there is only one counsel representing the Plaintiffs in that action, while there are two counsels in the present action. 44. Thus, Dr. Cooperstock was able to prepare a substantial portion of the preliminary motions in the Quebec Action by December 7, Due to the dying of his wife s grandmother, he was able to complete these documents only with substantial help from friends, and he did so only by the very last day (December 19, 2012) that the Quebec Code of Civil Procedure permits for filing documents for a hearing set for December 21, 2012.
13 It is difficult to follow the Plaintiffs argument that Dr. Cooperstock s filing preliminary motions in the Quebec Action on the very last day, which he accomplished with substantial help from friends, is inconsistent with his explanation for his delay in the present action. 46. On the contrary, Dr. Cooperstock s actions with respect to the Quebec Action demonstrate that he took deadlines seriously and made genuine efforts to comply with all of them; alas, he succeeded in complying only with some. 47. Dr. Cooperstock has been and remains self-represented in all actions commenced against him by the Plaintiffs. However, he does seek legal advice from time to time, and some of his court documents are reviewed by a counsel. 48. The Statement of Defence, being the blueprint for the entire action and for the evidence that may be sought through discovery, is certainly a document that Dr. Cooperstock intended to have reviewed by an attorney with expertise in trade-mark and copyright law. 49. Dr. Cooperstock did not have an initial draft of the Statement of Defence ready by December 7, 2012, at which time his efforts to mount a defence were significantly disrupted by the dying of his wife s grandmother. Thus, by that point, he had nothing to be reviewed by an attorney. Later, he had no access to an attorney specialized in trade-mark and copyright law due to the holiday season. Therefore, Dr. Cooperstock s first opportunity to seek legal advice from same about his draft Statement of Defence was on the week of January 7, Hence, it is respectfully submitted that these unique circumstances provide a reasonable explanation for Dr. Cooperstock s delay in filing his Statement of Defence.
14 E. CASE MANAGEMENT 51. The parties agree that continuing the present action as a specially managed proceeding is desirable, although their views on the reasons for doing so substantially differ. 52. Dr. Cooperstock denies the Plaintiffs allegation that he did not disclose all facts relevant to the present motion. Allegations of this nature by the Plaintiffs are not supported by any evidence before the Honourable Court. Plaintiffs Representations, para Case management is necessary in the present case to prevent the Plaintiffs and their counsels from creating conflicts between deadlines in the present action and the Quebec Action, which would ultimately undermine Dr. Cooperstock s ability to defend himself in one or both of the proceedings. 54. Dr. Cooperstock agrees with the Plaintiffs proposal that this Honourable Court fix a date for the filing and service of the Statement of Defence and the Reply. 55. In light of the upcoming hearing of Dr. Cooperstock s preliminary motions in the Quebec Action on February 15, 2013, Dr. Cooperstock respectfully asks that the Honourable Court allow 45 days from the service of the Reply for the filing and service of the Affidavit of Documents. 56. With respect to Examination for discovery, Dr. Cooperstock asks the Honourable Court to delay fixing a deadline until after the February 15, 2013 hearing in the Quebec Action (at which time the Quebec Superior Court is expected to fix the schedule of the action), in order to minimize any conflict between the demands of the two actions on Dr. Cooperstock s limited resources.
15 F. COSTS 57. In the present motion, Dr. Cooperstock is not asking to be compensated for his own time spent on preparing the motion and the reply; he is only seeking to be indemnified with respect to the printing and binding costs ($ for the Motion Record and approximately $20.00 for the present Reply), and for legal fees paid to an attorney not specialized in trade-mark and copyright law, for reviewing of documents related to the present motion on short notice. 58. The actions of the Plaintiffs and their counsel forced Dr. Cooperstock to bring the present motion and to incur expenses unnecessarily: (a) (b) the Plaintiffs have unnecessarily commenced two separate proceedings in two different courts against Dr. Cooperstock, even though they could have commenced a single action before the Quebec Superior Court; counsel for the Plaintiffs unreasonably withheld her consent to a reasonable request for an extension of the deadline for filing the Statement of Defence even after she was informed about death in Dr. Cooperstock s family, contrary to paragraphs 4 and 30 the Principles of Civility for Advocates. 59. Even though the Plaintiffs do not oppose the motion for an extension, they made a substantial amount of prejudicial representations, which necessitated the present Reply, and caused Dr. Cooperstock to incur additional costs. 60. Thus, it is submitted that in the case at bar, ordering that the Plaintiffs fully indemnify Dr. Cooperstock for the expenses incurred in relation to the motion is warranted and also necessary to express the Honourable Court s disapproval of the conduct of the Plaintiffs and their counsel.
16 The Plaintiffs misstate the law with respect to availability of costs to lay litigants; indeed, Stevens v. Canada (Attorney General) cited by the Plaintiffs states the contrary: [19] I think that jurisprudence such as Okanagan above and respected authorities such as Orkin above represent for lay litigants an encouraging sense of shift in the common law on costs towards embracing compensation for the time of lay litigants. However, with specific regard to the Applicants in these two Federal Court matters, it has not moved so significantly that an assessment officer could ordinarily read the award of costs here as a Rule 400(1) exercise of discretion authorizing recovery from the Crown of compensation for their time. The alternative, which did not occur here, would have been a petition to the hearing judge for lump sum costs or for a direction to the assessment officer to allow something for their time. I therefore have no jurisdiction to allow costs for their time. [Emphasis added.] 62. Dr. Cooperstock submits that a lump sum costs of $500.00, inclusive of disbursements, would be appropriate in the circumstances. ALL OF WHICH IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. January 18, 2013 DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK 392 Grosvenor Street Westmount, Québec H3Z 2M2 Tel: jcooperstock@gmail.com Defendant / Moving Party
DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY
Court File No.: T-2084-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY Dated: January 31, 2014 DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK 392 Grosvenor
More informationI. Plaintiff is seeking a remedy not pleaded in the Amended Statement of Claim
Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock 436 Strathcona Ave. Westmount, QC H3Y 2X1 jcooperstock@gmail.com January 12, 2017 Administrator Federal Court of Canada Thomas D Arcy McGee Building 90 Sparks Street, 5th floor Ottawa
More informationUNITED AIRLINES, INC. and JEREMY COOPERSTOCK ORDER AND REASONS
Date: 20140703 Docket: T-2084-12 Citation: 2014 FC 645 Montréal, Quebec, July 3, 2014 PRESENT: Prothonotary Richard Morneau BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant ORDER
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX
October 1, 1996 Last Update: February 23, 2018 Index Page 1 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX RULE 1 - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION...
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA
PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA November 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE TO PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT
More informationSUPERIOR. (Civil Division) and. and. and. and. vs.
CANADA SUPERIOR (Civil Division) COURT PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL No: 500-17-074743-124 UNITED AIR LINES, INC., a legal person, duly constituted according to law, having its principal place
More informationCLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX RULE 1 - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION... 3 1.01 Definitions...
More informationA BILL FOR A LAW FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE IN EKITI STATE EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA
A BILL FOR A LAW FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE IN EKITI STATE EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA 1 EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE BILL, 2018 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Objectives
More informationSECTION 1 INTRODUCTORY RULES...
Preamble This Arbitration Procedure has been prepared by Engineers Ireland principally for use in disputes arising out of engineering work, and in particular construction Contracts. However its use is
More informationON1CALL RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR HEARINGS 1) DEFINITIONS
ON1CALL RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR HEARINGS 1) DEFINITIONS 360 Feedback means the web-based solution provided by the Corporation for either (i) Members or Members designates to use to notify the Corporation
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationNOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. TO ALL customers of
More informationCivil Procedure Act 2010
Examinable excerpts of Civil Procedure Act 2010 as at 2 October 2018 1 Purposes CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY (1) The main purposes of this Act are (a) to reform and modernise the laws, practice, procedure and
More informationGuernsey case management and civil proceedings
JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE GUERNSEY BRIEFING August 2015 Guernsey case management and civil proceedings Proactive case management is a concept that pervades modern Guernsey civil procedure. This
More informationAssessment Review Board
Assessment Review Board RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (made under section 25.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act) INDEX 1. RULES Application and Definitions (Rules 1-2) Interpretation and Effect
More informationTechnical Standards and Safety Authority. Rules of Practice
Technical Standards and Safety Authority Rules of Practice APPEALS FILED UNDER SUBSECTION 22.(1) OF THE TECHNICAL STANDARDS & SAFETY ACT, 2000, S.O. 2000, CHAPTER 16 April, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENT TSSA Rules
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Case No. [redacted]
1 0 1 [attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Plaintiff GFH PROPERTIES, a California General Partnership Names have been
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER
RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER INTRODUCTION The following Rules of Procedure have been adopted by the Cowlitz County Hearing Examiner. The examiner and deputy examiners
More informationFinancial Services Tribunal. Practice Directives and Guidelines
Financial Services Tribunal Practice Directives and Guidelines Revised October 2012 Financial Services Tribunal Practice Directives and Guidelines 1.0 Introduction The purpose of these Practice Directives
More informationICDR/AAA EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Annex I Arbitration Rules
ICDR/AAA EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Annex I Arbitration Rules Effective as of September 15, 2017 THE EU-U.S. PRIVACY SHIELD ANNEX I BINDING ARBITRATION PROGRAM These Rules govern arbitrations that take place
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE October 2015 RULES OF PROCEDURE Table of Contents RULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION... 4 1.01 DEFINITIONS... 4 1.02 GENERAL
More informationERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS
ERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS SECTION I - INTRODUCTORY RULES Scope of Application Article 1 1. Pursuant to Article 5, paragraph
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009
COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Court of Appeal Rules 2009 Arrangement of Rules COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Arrangement of Rules Rule PART I - PRELIMINARY 7 1 Citation and commencement... 7 2 Interpretation....
More informationCriminal Procedure Act 2009
Examinable excerpts of Criminal Procedure Act 2009 as at 2 October 2017 CHAPTER 2 COMMENCING A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING PART 2.1 WAYS IN WHICH A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS COMMENCED 5 How a criminal proceeding
More information/...1 PRIVATE ARBITRATION KIT
1007453/...1 PRIVATE ARBITRATION KIT Introduction This document contains Guidelines, Rules and a Model Agreement in respect of private arbitrations. It is designed to assist practitioners when referring
More informationDr. Nael Bunni, Chairman, Dispute Resolution Panel, Engineers Ireland, 22 Clyde Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4. December 2000.
Preamble This Arbitration Procedure has been prepared by Engineers Ireland principally for use with the Engineers Ireland Conditions of Contract for arbitrations conducted under the Arbitration Acts 1954
More informationPART 11: RECOVERABLE COSTS OF LITIGATION, ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AND SANCTIONS
PART 11: RECOVERABLE COSTS OF LITIGATION, ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AND SANCTIONS What this Part is about: This Part deals with: how the Court may make an order or direction with respect to costs in a proceeding;
More information2009 No (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES
S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2009 No. 1976 (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 Made - - - - 16th July 2009 Laid
More informationFACTUM OF THE APPLICANT
Court File No. 12821-15 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N : TANNER CURRIE -and- Applicant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, and CHRISTOPHER LABRECHE Respondents FACTUM
More informationTHE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, 1999 Section 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Object of Act 4. Interpretation 5. Non-application of Act 6. Act binds the State Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY
More informationBEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 79. Reference No: IACDT 020/14
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 79 Reference No: IACDT 020/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9. and a hearing concerning GEORGE COUTLEE RESPONDENT
2018 LSBC 33 Decision issued: November 16, 2018 Citation issued: July 13, 2017 THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9 and a hearing concerning GEORGE
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter
More informationLOCAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES DISTRICT COURT DIVISION
LOCAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES DISTRICT COURT DIVISION THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT BLADEN BRUNSWICK COLUMBUS DISTRICT COURT JUDGES OFFICE 110-A COURTHOUSE SQUARE WHITEVILLE,
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19)
COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19) IN exercise of the powers conferred on the Rules of Court Committee by Article 157(2) of the Constitution these Rules are made this 24th day of July, 1997. PART I-GENERAL
More informationSchedule of Forms. Rule No. Form No. Source
QUEEN S BENCH FORMS SCHEDULE OF FORMS Schedule of Forms FORMS FOR PART 1 [Foundational Rules] Form Nil Rule No. Form No. Source FORMS FOR PART 2 [Parties to Litigation] Form Rule No. Form No. Source Notice
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Financial Services Tribunal Tribunal des services financiers RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL Ce document est également disponible en français TABLE
More informationUniform Class Proceedings Act
8-1 Uniform Law Conference of Canada Uniform Class Proceedings Act 8-2 Table of Contents PART I: DEFINITIONS 1 Definitions PART II: CERTIFICATION 2 Plaintiff s class proceeding 3 Defendant s class proceeding
More informationSTREET SW EDMONTON, AB T6X 1E9 Phone: Fax: SURFACE RIGHTS BOARD RULES
1229-91 STREET SW EDMONTON, AB T6X 1E9 Phone: 780-427-2444 Fax: 780-427-5798 SURFACE RIGHTS BOARD RULES RULES OF THE SURFACE RIGHTS BOARD TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule # PART 1: PURPOSE, APPLICATION OF RULES,
More informationThe Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)
The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board) Final Draft Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered
More informationPROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER
PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER Office of the Mining and Lands Commissioner Box 330, 24th Floor, 700 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M5G 126 Table of Contents PROCEDURAL
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT J. WILSON, KARAKATSANIS, AND BRYANT JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star and Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2010 ONSC 991 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 34/09 DATE: 20100326 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL
More informationToronto Local Appeal Body Public Guide
Toronto Local Appeal Body Public Guide Revised on August 15, 2017 Contact information: Toronto Local Appeal Body 40 Orchard View Boulevard Suite 211 Toronto, ON M4R 1B9 Tel: (416) 392-4697 Web: www.toronto.ca/tlab
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER March 29, 2012 This Standing Order supercedes all prior Standing Orders regarding pending
More informationPROVINCIAL OFFENCES PROCEDURE ACT
Province of Alberta PROVINCIAL OFFENCES PROCEDURE ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter P-34 Current as of May 1, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer
More informationThe OIA for Ministers and agencies
The OIA for Ministers and agencies A guide to processing official information requests The purpose of this guide is to assist Ministers and government agencies in recognising and responding to requests
More informationDispute Resolution Service Policy
Dispute Resolution Service Policy 1. Definitions Abusive Registration means a Domain Name which either: i. was registered or otherwise acquired in a manner which, at the time when the registration or acquisition
More informationSchedule A Review Board Rules of Procedure
Schedule A Review Board Rules of Procedure General Principle 1. These Rules shall be liberally construed to secure the just, most expeditious and least expensive determination of every matter before the
More informationUniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 Part 1 Preliminary Division 1 General 1.1 Name of rules These rules are the. 1.2 Definitions (1) Words and expressions that are defined in the Dictionary at the end of
More informationBY-LAW NO. 44 ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE
BY-LAW NO. 44 OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OCSWSSW - Discipline Committee Rules of Procedure Index Page
More informationThe Class Actions Act
1 CLASS ACTIONS c. C-12.01 The Class Actions Act being Chapter C-12.01 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2001 (effective January 1, 2002) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007, c.21; and 2015,
More informationADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of
More informationADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE
ADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE Parties who agree to arbitrate under the Rules may use the following clause in their agreement: ADRIC Arbitration
More informationFEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE I. APPOINTMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMITTEE
FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE I. APPOINTMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMITTEE A. This Committee, and its Chair, shall consist of Attorneys who are trained in Mediation, and/or Arbitration,
More informationD R C. Rules. (As amended in July 2008)
D R C Rules (As amended in July 2008) 1 RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE DRC T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S PART ONE SERVING AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS 1. How to contact the DRC 2. Addresses
More informationGUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES
GUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES All persons named as respondents in a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have the right to a hearing. The purpose
More informationENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION ACT
Province of Alberta ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter E-10 Current as of December 2, 2010 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen
More informationSUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES
SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES Justice: HON. THOMAS RADEMAKER Secretary: MARILYN McINTOSH Part Clerk: TRINA PAYNE Phone: (516) 493-3420 Courtroom: (516) 493-3423 Fax:
More informationCARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE APPELLATE JURISDICTION RULES 2017
CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE APPELLATE JURISDICTION RULES 2017 In exercise of the powers conferred on the President of the Caribbean Court of Justice pursuant to Article 21 of the Agreement Establishing
More informationRules for the conduct of proceedings before the CCMA. Act. Published under. GN R1448 in GG of 10 October as amended by
Rules for the conduct of proceedings before the CCMA Act Published under GN R1448 in GG 25515 of 10 October 2003 as amended by GN R1512 in GG 25607 of 17 October 2003 GN R1748 of 2003 in GG 25797 of 5
More informationCode of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health
HEALTH MARCH 2017 Code of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION...1 1. Application...1 2. Purpose and Interpretation...1 3. Definitions...2
More informationRule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles
Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL 8401. Introduction (1) The Rules of Practice and Procedure (the Rules of Procedure ) set out the rules that govern the conduct of IIROC s enforcement proceedings
More informationOrder F05-25 MINISTRY OF HEALTH. Errol Nadeau, Adjudicator. August 10, 2005
Order F05-25 MINISTRY OF HEALTH Errol Nadeau, Adjudicator August 10, 2005 Quicklaw Cite: [2005] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 33 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/orderf05-33.pdf Office URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca
More informationIllegal Logging Prohibition Act 2012
Illegal Logging Prohibition Act 2012 No. 166, 2012 An Act to combat illegal logging, and for related purposes Note: An electronic version of this Act is available in ComLaw (http://www.comlaw.gov.au/)
More informationThe Small Claims Act, 2016
1 SMALL CLAIMS, 2016 c S-50.12 The Small Claims Act, 2016 being Chapter S-50.12 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2016 (effective January 1, 2018). *NOTE: Pursuant to subsection 33(1) of The Interpretation
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE INSURANCE & FINANCIAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN SCHEME INCORPORATED
TERMS OF REFERENCE INSURANCE & FINANCIAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN SCHEME INCORPORATED 1 JULY 2015 Contents 1. Definitions and Interpretation... 3 2. Delegation Powers... 5 3. Principal Powers and Duties of the
More informationLegal assistance for civil claims under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance
Legal assistance for civil claims under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance Legal Assistance Section 66 of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance ( Ordinance ) provides that an individual who suffers
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE. Issued Date: 3 January 2011
TERMS OF REFERENCE Issued Date: 3 January 2011 Last Revised Date: 21 March 2017 List of Revisions Revision No. Revision Date Effective Date Revision 1 23 November 2015 1 December 2015 Revision 2 21 March
More informationCriminal Procedure Act, 1993
Criminal Procedure Act, 1993 Number 40 of 1993 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, 1993 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Interpretation. 2. Review by Court of Criminal Appeal of alleged miscarriage of justice or
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES
THE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES (For disputes arising under the Contract for Sale of Land 2005 Edition) Preamble The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales resolved at a meeting on
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk
July 23, 2013 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge Chambers Courtroom Deputy Clerk United States Courthouse Ms. Gina Sicora 300 Quarropas Street (914) 390-4178
More informationFirst Session Tenth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. Act No. 11 of 2010
First Session Tenth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No. 11 of 2010 [L.S.] AN ACT to provide for and about the interception of communications, the acquisition
More informationthe other Party has otherwise failed to carry out its obligations under this Agreement; or
CHAPTER TWENTY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT ARTICLE 20.1: COOPERATION The Parties shall at all times endeavor to agree on the interpretation and application of this Agreement, and shall make every attempt through
More informationLITIGATION PLAN BERG V. CANADIAN HOCKEY LEAGUE ET AL. AS AT JUNE 15, 2016
LITIGATION PLAN BERG V. CANADIAN HOCKEY LEAGUE ET AL. AS AT JUNE 15, 2016 DEFINITIONS 1. The following defined terms apply: (a) (b) (c) Action means this proposed class proceeding, Court File No. CV-14-514423,
More informationDecision F09-04 MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT. Celia Francis, Senior Adjudicator. June 22, 2009
Decision F09-04 MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Celia Francis, Senior Adjudicator June 22, 2009 Quicklaw Cite: [2009] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 15 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/section43/decisionf09-04.pdf
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SAANICH BYLAW NO TO REGULATE THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL AND COUNCIL COMMITTEES
THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SAANICH BYLAW NO. 9321 TO REGULATE THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL AND COUNCIL COMMITTEES The Council of the Corporation of the District of Saanich enacts as follows:
More informationSINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)
GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record - Supreme Court of India National President of Arbitration Bar of India
More informationThe LGOIMA for local government agencies
The LGOIMA for local government agencies A guide to processing requests and conducting meetings The purpose of this guide is to assist local government agencies in recognising and responding to requests
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Doucette v. Nova Scotia, 2016 NSSC 78
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Doucette v. Nova Scotia, 2016 NSSC 78 Date: 2016-03-24 Docket: Hfx No. 412065 Registry: Halifax Between: Laura Doucette Plaintiff v. Her Majesty in right of the Province
More informationDecision F08-06 TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY. Celia Francis, Senior Adjudicator. July 16, 2008
Decision F08-06 TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY Celia Francis, Senior Adjudicator July 16, 2008 Quicklaw Cite: [2008] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 23 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/section56/decisionf08-06.pdf Summary:
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE MANUAL
WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE MANUAL (revised July 2016) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.00 The Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal 1.10 Introduction 1.11 Definitions 1.20 Role of the Tribunal
More informationONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE
ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE 1. APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION... 1 (1) APPLICATION... 1 2. FILING DOCUMENTS... 1 (1) REDACTIONS... 1 (2) MERITS HEARING FOR AN ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDING...
More informationLabour Court Rules, 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES PART I
DISTRIBUTED BY VERITAS TRUST Tel: [263] [4] 794478 Fax & Messages [263] [4] 793592 E-mail: veritas@mango.zw VERITAS MAKES EVERY EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PROVISION OF RELIABLE INFORMATION, BUT CANNOT TAKE LEGAL
More informationLEGAL PROFESSION ACT
Rules of the Law Society of the Northwest Territories...6 INTERPRETATION...6 PART I...6 THE SOCIETY...6 HONORARY EXECUTIVE MEMBERS...7 ELECTION OF THE EXECUTIVE...7 EXECUTIVE MEETINGS AND DUTIES OF OFFICERS...
More informationIAAF ATHLETICS INTEGRITY UNIT REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION RULES (NON-DOPING)
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 On 3 April 2017, the Integrity Unit of the IAAF was established in accordance with the IAAF Constitution and the IAAF Integrity Unit Rules. 1.2 The role of the Integrity Unit is to
More informationPART I CITATION AND INTERPRETATION 1. Citation Interpretation 4
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS RULES* (Issued September 1986; revised September 2004 (name changed); further revised September 2006) Rule PART I Page CITATION AND INTERPRETATION 1. Citation. 4 2. Interpretation
More informationBETWEEN: The Complainant COMPLAINANT. AND: A Dentist REGISTRANT. BEFORE: William R. Cottick, Panel Chair REVIEW BOARD
Health Professions Review Board Suite 900, 747 Fort Street, Victoria, BC V8W 3E9 Complainant v. College of Dental Surgeons of BC DECISION NO. 2018-HPA-047(a) August 15, 2018 In the matter of an application
More information- 4 - APPLICABILITY OF ARBITRATIONS ACT, 1991
www.barryfisher.ca - 2 - INTRODUCTION Up until very recently it was assumed that the only way in which a non-unionized employee could have his or her employment dispute adjudicated upon was either before
More informationLegal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014
Examinable excerpts of Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 as at 10 April 2018 Schedule 1 Legal Profession Uniform Law 169 Objectives PART 4.3 LEGAL COSTS Division 1 Introduction The objectives
More informationAgreement for the Supply of Legal Services by a Barrister in a Commercial Case
Agreement for the Supply of Legal Services by a Barrister in a Commercial Case The Barrister and the Solicitor agree that the Barrister will supply the Services for the benefit of the Lay Client on the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NICHOLAS CHALUPA, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Other ) No. 1:12-cv-10868-JCB Persons Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL
More informationThe Compulsory Purchase (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 2007
SI 2007/367 Page 2007 No. 367 TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES, ENGLAND AND WALES The Compulsory Purchase (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 2007 Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited. UK Statutory Instruments Crown Copyright.
More informationJOHN DOE #1, proposed representative Respondent on behalf of a class of Respondents RESPONDENT (DEFENDANT)
Court File No. T-662-16 FEDERAL COURT PROPOSED CLASS PROCEEDING B E T W E E N: VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, COBBLER NEVADA, LLC, PTG NEVADA, LLC, CLEAR SKIES NEVADA, LLC, GLACIER ENTERTAINMENT SARL OF LUXEMBOURG,
More informationNOTES FOR THE GUIDANCE OF PARTIES TO CONSISTORY COURT PROCEEDINGS
NOTES FOR THE GUIDANCE OF PARTIES TO CONSISTORY COURT PROCEEDINGS Public Notices Before a Faculty is granted, a Public Notice is published for 28 days in the Parish concerned, usually on a noticeboard
More informationPAY EQUITY HEARINGS TRIBUNAL RULES OF PRACTICE
PAY EQUITY HEARINGS TRIBUNAL RULES OF PRACTICE MARCH 2018 MISSION STATEMENT The purpose of the Pay Equity Act is to redress systemic gender discrimination in compensation. Its implementation will contribute
More informationOrder COLLEGE OF PHARMACISTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Order 02-03 COLLEGE OF PHARMACISTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA David Loukidelis, Information and Privacy Commissioner January 24, 2002 Quicklaw Cite: [2002] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 3 Document URL: http://www.oipcbc.org/orders/order02-03.pdf
More informationBill C-58: An Act to amend the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
Bill C-58: An Act to amend the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts Publication No. 42-1-C58-E 10 October 2017 Chloé Forget Maxime-Olivier Thibodeau
More information