The Uniform Rapid Suspension Policy and Rules Summary
|
|
- Sharlene Hunter
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Uniform Rapid Suspension Policy and Rules Summary The Uniform Rapid Suspension System ( URS ) is one of several new Rights Protection Mechanisms ( RPMs ) being implemented alongside the new gtld Program. The URS is intended to complement the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( UDRP ) by offering lower-cost, expedited relief to rights holders in instances of clear-cut infringement. I. Procedure As with the UDRP, a URS proceeding begins by filing a complaint electronically with a URS provider. URS filing fees are expected to be substantially lower than UDRP fees, which can range from about $1,000 to over $7,000, depending on the provider, the number of panelists, and the number of domains involved. 1 ICANN has set a target price range of $300- $500 for URS filing fees, but the fees have not yet been set. The requirements for a URS complaint are essentially the same as those in a UDRP proceeding. 2 A properly filed complaint must allege: (1) that the registered domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a word mark (a) for which the Complainant holds a valid national or regional registration and that is in current use, or (b) that has been validated through a court proceeding, or (c) that is specifically protected by a statute or treaty in effect at the time the URS complaint is filed; (2) that the Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name; and (3) that the domain was registered and is being used in bad faith. 3 Any elaboration beyond these required criteria is subject to a Spartan 500-word limit. 4 This limit may seem severe at first glance, particularly when contrasted with the UDRP, which omits any such word-limitation, 5 but it is in keeping with the function of the URS as a mechanism for instances of clear-cut infringement. 1 See, e.g., Czech Arbitration Court, UDRP Supplemental Rules, Annex A: Fee Schedule (indicating fees ranging from $500 for a one to four domain dispute with one panelist, to $7,100 for a dispute of up to 50 domains and a three-member panel). 2 Compare URS Procedure, art with ICANN, Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, art. 4(a)- (b) (Oct. 24, 1999), [hereinafter UDRP Procedure] 3 ICANN, Uniform Rapid Suspension System, art (Mar. 1, 2013), applicants/ urs/procedure-01mar13-en.pdf [hereinafter URS Procedure]; id. art (a)-(d) (describing circumstances that demonstrate bad faith registration). 4 URS Procedure, art Word limits are subject to supplemental rules issued by UDRP providers.
2 Within two business days of receiving a complaint, the URS provider will conduct an Administrative Review for compliance with the filing requirements. 6 If a complaint is deemed non-compliant it will be dismissed without prejudice, and the initial filing fees will not be refunded. 7 The URS is much more unforgiving than the UDRP in this regard. A UDRP Administrative Review is conducted in three calendar days, and a non-compliant complaint is permitted amelioration within five calendar days before being subject to dismissal. 8 This strict compliance requirement should help to keep URS fees reasonable, and may operate as a both a filter and a deterrent to frivolous claims and claims more properly submitted under the UDRP. If a complaint passes the Administrative Review, the URS provider will notify the relevant registry operator, which must lock the domain within twenty-four hours. 9 Once the domain is locked, the provider must notify the registrant of the complaint within twenty-four hours. 10 The registrant must then file a response, limited to 2,500 words, within fourteen calendar days from the date the Provider sent notice. 11 In contrast to the URS, the UDRP Policy and Rules establish a response period of twenty calendar days, 12 and do not expressly provide a maximum time period for a response extension, nor do they limit response length. 13 The URS proceeding is conducted by a single examiner, selected by the provider. In contrast, the UDRP s examining system is more complex, and may consist of either one panelist selected by the UDRP Provider, or a three-member panel selected jointly between the provider and the parties. 14 The streamlining of the URS examination reduces costs, and may help reduce the length of the proceeding by eliminating panel selection. 6 URS Procedure, arts URS Procedure, art ICANN, Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Rules, art. 4(a)-(b) (Oct. 30, 2009), [hereinafter UDRP Rules]. 9 URS Procedure, art URS Procedure, art URS Procedure, art Upon request, the provider may grant the registrant an extension of as many as seven calendar days to file a response if there is a good faith basis for doing so, and if the request is received during the response period, after default, or not more than thirty calendar days following a determination of default by the provider. URS Procedure, art UDRP Rules, art. 5(a). 13 See UDRP Rules, art. 5(b), (d). 14 See UDRP Rules, art. 6. A Complainant or Registrant may request a three-member panel. If a three-member panel is requested, each party submits a list of three candidates from the Provider s approved panelist list to serve as a member of the panel. In this manner, one member is chosen by Complainant, one by Respondent, and one by the Provider. If a three-member panel is requested by the Registrant, the Registrant must split the fees equally with the Complainant. See id.
3 In cases where the registrant does not file a response (default), the complaint will proceed to the examiner for review on the merits. 15 If the examiner rules in favor of the complainant, the registrant has the right to seek a de novo review of the decision. The registrant may do so by filing a response at any time within six months of the date of default, and may request an extension of an additional six months if the request is made within the initial six month period. 16 The filing of such a response is not considered an appeal ; rather, the case is considered as if the registrant had responded to in a timely manner. 17 The UDRP does not provide this right explicitly, but it does provide that exceptional circumstances may excuse a registrant from filing a response within the required time period. 18 While perhaps not ideal, the timelines anticipated by the URS guidelines reflect a procedure substantially quicker and more economical than the UDRP. II. Standard of Proof To prevail in a URS proceeding, a complainant must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that no genuine issue of material fact exists as to any of the elements of the claim. 19 The UDRP, by contrast, requires only that a complainant prove each element of a claim by a preponderance of the evidence, and permits an arbitration panel greater leeway than an examiner in what evidence and principles are permitted consideration. 20 This standard of proof represents perhaps the most significant difference between the URS and UDRP. Because the URS is designed to be used only against transparent trademark abuse, it does not permit open questions of fact. This allows URS determinations to made much more quickly than a UDRP, within three to five business days from the start of an examination. III. Remedies If a URS complainant is successful, the relevant registry will suspend the domain name for the balance of the domain s registration period. During suspension, the domain will not resolve to the registrant s web site, but to a page providing information about the URS. 21 Any transfer, deletion, or modification of the domain will be disabled. Unlike a UDRP complainant, a successful URS complainant cannot obtain a cancellation or transfer of the domain. This renders the URS unsuitable for claimants that 15 URS Procedure, art URS Procedure, art URS Procedure, art UDRP Rules, art. 14(a). 19 URS Procedure, arts UDRP Policy, art. 4(a); UDRP Rules, art. 15(a). 21 URS Procedure, art
4 wish to recover the domain at issue. While a successful complainant may extend the registration period for an additional year at commercial rates, the domain cannot be recovered except by registration following the domain s expiration. If an examiner denies the complainant relief, the URS proceeding will be terminated without prejudice, and the domain will be unlocked with full control returned to the registrant. Following an adverse decision, a complainant may institute a URS appeal, a UDRP proceeding, or a court proceeding. 22 IV. Appeal Either party to a URS may seek a de novo appeal within fourteen days of default or an adverse determination. A URS appeal will be conducted by a panel selected by the provider, as opposed to a single examiner. The appellant will bear the cost for appeal, but those fees have not yet been specified. An appellant must identify the specific grounds on which the party is appealing, including why the appellant claims the examiner s determination was incorrect. 23 Upon payment of a fee, in addition to the appeal filing fee, an appellant may introduce new admissible material evidence, provided the evidence clearly pre-dates the filing of the complaint. 24 An appellee s response, if any, must be filed within fourteen days following the filing of an appeal. 25 For the duration of the appeal a domain will remain locked or unlocked based on the outcome of the prior determination. 26 IV. Conclusion In sum, the URS, while imperfect, will undoubtedly prove useful to brand owners and trademark practitioners. Low cost and the prospect of speedier resolution are enticing advantages, even if they come at the expense of more robust remedies. From start to finish, a URS proceeding may take as little as sixteen days assuming a same-day Administrative Review/Locking/Notification period, a 14-day Response period ending in default, a same-day determination, and no further action by the registrant. The URS s more demanding standard of review and its limited remedies restrict its use against many infringers, but these shortcomings should not overshadow what is ultimately a welcome addition to the trademark enforcer s toolkit. 22 URS Procedure, art URS Procedure, art URS Procedure, art URS Procedure, art URS Procedure, art
5
For GNSO Consideration: Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) October 2009
For GNSO Consideration: Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) October 2009 Contents Introduction....... 1 Part I Draft Uniform Rapid Suspension System ( URS ) Procedure.....4 Part II Draft Applicant Guidebook
More informationUNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 11 JANUARY 2012
UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 11 JANUARY 2012 DRAFT PROCEDURE 1. Complaint 1.1 Filing the Complaint a) Proceedings are initiated by electronically filing with a URS Provider a Complaint outlining
More informationDominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy
Dominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Dominion Registries Registration Policy. This SDRP is effective
More information[.onl] Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy
[.onl] Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registration Agreement. This SDRP is effective as of January 2, 2014. An
More informationSUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
The Registry has developed and adopted this Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ) which is to be read together with other Registry Policies, the Registry-Registrar Agreement, the Registration
More informationSunrise Dispute Resolution Policy VERSION 1.0
Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy VERSION 1.0 This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registration Agreement. This SDRP is effective as of 12 th August
More informationSunrise Dispute Resolution Policy
Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registration Agreement for the Amazon Registry Services, Inc. top-level domain.bot
More informationRules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( the Rules )
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( the Rules ) On 17 May 2018 the ICANN Board adopted a Temporary Specification for gtld Registration Data ("Temporary Specification"). The content
More informationSunrise Dispute Resolution Policy
This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Domain Name Registration Agreement. This SDRP is effective as of 11 March 2014. An SDRP Complaint may be filed against
More informationTRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012
TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012 1. Parties to the Dispute The parties to the dispute will be the trademark holder and the gtld registry operator. ICANN
More informationthe domain name is not identical to the mark on which the registrant based its Sunrise registration; (2)
SDRP Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy This policy is to be read together with the General Terms & Conditions and words and phrases used in this policy have the same meaning attributed to them in the General
More information.XN--MGBCA7DZDO SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
.XN--MGBCA7DZDO SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registration Agreement. This SDRP is effective as of 29 July 2014.
More informationREGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1.0 Title: Registration Eligibility Dispute Resolution Policy Version Control: 1.0 Date of Implementation: 2016-01-20 2.0 Summary This Registration Eligibility
More information.CREDITUNION SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
1. Scope and Purpose.CREDITUNION SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY CUNA Performance Resources, LLC (CPR) is the Registry Operator of the.creditunion top-level domain (TLD), and this Sunrise Dispute Resolution
More informationDear ICANN, Best regards, ADR.EU, Czech Arbitration Court
Dear ICANN, ADR.EU center of the Czech Arbitration Court has prepared a proposal for a new process within UDRP. Please find attached proposed amendments of our UDRP Supplemental Rules which we submit for
More informationAmerican Bible Society DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy
American Bible Society DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy The American Bible Society ( ABS or Registry ) hereby incorporates this DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy ( DCDRP ) by reference
More informationURS 2.0? WIPO Discussion Contribution
URS 2.0? WIPO Discussion Contribution Toronto October 2012 David Roache-Turner WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center 2 Uniform Rapid Suspension System Intended for clear-cut cases of abuse To be an efficient,
More informationREGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 REVISED - NOVEMBER 2010
REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 REVISED - NOVEMBER 2010 1. Parties to the Dispute The parties to the dispute will be the harmed organization or individual and the gtld registry
More informationREGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 19 SEPTEMBER 2011
REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 19 SEPTEMBER 2011 1. Parties to the Dispute The parties to the dispute will be the harmed established institution and the gtld registry operator.
More informationa) to take account of the policy rules that apply to.au domain names, that do not apply to gtld domain names; and
auda PUBLISHED POLICY Policy Title:.au DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) Policy No: 2010-05 Publication Date: 13/08/2010 Status: Current 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 This document sets out the.au Dispute Resolution
More information.VERSICHERUNG. Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names
.VERSICHERUNG Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names Overview Chapter I - Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP)... 2 1. Purpose...
More information.FARMERS DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES
.FARMERS DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES Page 1 of 14 CHAPTER 1. Definitions, scope of application and eligibility Article 1. Definitions Throughout these Policies, the following capitalized terms have
More informationdotberlin GmbH & Co. KG
Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) 1. This policy has been adopted by all accredited Domain Name Registrars for Domain Names ending in.berlin. 2. The policy is between the Registrar
More information.BOSTIK DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES
CHAPTER 1. Definitions, scope of application and eligibility Article 1. Definitions Throughout these Policies, the following capitalized terms have the following meaning: Accredited Registrar means an
More informationSunrise and DPML Dispute Resolution Policy
Sunrise and DPML Dispute Resolution Policy This document describes the rules that Rightside will use when resolving Sunrise and DPML disputes. Copyright 2015 Rightside Registry Copyright 2014 Rightside
More informationTop Level Design LLC January 22, 2015
Top Level Design LLC January 22, 2015 Defined Terms Definitions are provided in the definitions section of the Registry Registrar Agreement or as otherwise defined in the body of the Policy. Sunrise Dispute
More information.BOOKING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES
.BOOKING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES Page 1 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. Definitions, scope of application and eligibility...3 Article 1. Definitions... 3 Article 2. Scope of application...
More information.NIKE DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES
.NIKE DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES Page 1 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. Definitions, scope of application and eligibility...3 Article 1. Definitions... 3 Article 2. Scope of application... 6
More informationTRADEMARK CLEARINGHOUSE
The following chart sets out the differences between the recommendations in the IRT Final Report (http://www.icann.org/en/topics/newgtlds/irt final report trademark protection 29may09 en.pdf) and the versions
More information.HEALTH STARTUP PLAN Version 1.0
.HEALTH STARTUP PLAN Version 1.0 I. OVERVIEW: Pursuant to the Trademark Clearinghouse Rights Protection Mechanism Requirements found at https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/tmch-requirements-2014-01-09-en
More informationPrimary DNS Name : TOMCAT.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Primary DNS IP: Secondary DNS Name: SKYHAWK.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Secondary DNS IP:
2005 3 1/10 2005 3 2/10 Primary DNS Name : TOMCAT.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Primary DNS IP: 202.224.39.55 Secondary DNS Name: SKYHAWK.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Secondary DNS IP: 202.224.32.3 2005 3 3/10 2005 3 4/10 Registration
More informationBackground on ICANN s Role Concerning the UDRP & Courts. Tim Cole Chief Registrar Liaison ICANN
Background on ICANN s Role Concerning the UDRP & Courts Tim Cole Chief Registrar Liaison ICANN Brief History of ICANN Created in 1998 as a global multi-stakeholder organization responsible for the technical
More informationWorkshop on the Current State of the UDRP
Workshop on the Current State of the UDRP Overview & Analysis of the Preliminary Issue Report 22 June 2011 Moderators: Mary Wong Jonathan Cohen 2 Background & Current Approach Issue Report Requested by
More information.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES
.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES Page 1 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. Definitions, scope of application and eligibility... 3 Article 1. Definitions... 3 Article 2. Scope of application... 7
More informationBusiness Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.
RRDRP Rules These Rules are in effect for all RRDRP proceedings. Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Registry Restrictions Dispute Resolution Procedure shall be governed
More informationRULES FOR NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM S SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
RULES FOR NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM S SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1. Definitions (a) The Policy means s Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy ( SDRP ). (b) The Rules means the rules in this document.
More informationBusiness Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.
PDDRP Rule These Rules are in effect for all PDDRP proceedings. Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Trademark Post- Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure shall be governed
More informationdotcoop will cancel, transfer, or otherwise make changes to domain name registrations as rendered by a WIPO ruling.
.coop Dispute Policy Basic Philosophy: First Come, First Served When an eligible cooperative claims a domain name, they are doing so guided by the desire to claim the name they have considered, planned
More information. 淡马锡 REGISTRATION POLICIES
. 淡马锡 REGISTRATION POLICIES CHAPTER 1. Definitions, scope of application and eligibility Article 1. Definitions Throughout this Policy, the following capitalized terms have the following meaning: Accredited
More information26 th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference
American Bar Association Intellectual Property Law Section 26 th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference The New gtlds: Dispute Resolution Procedures During Evaluation, Trademark Post Delegation Dispute
More informationTHE FORUM's SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO ICANN S TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE AND RULES
THE FORUM's SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO ICANN S TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE AND RULES Supplemental Rules 1. Definitions (a) The Rules means the Rules for the Trademark Post-Delegation
More informationAttachment 3..Brand TLD Designation Application
Attachment 3.Brand TLD Designation Application Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ( ICANN ) 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90094 Attention: New gtld Program
More informationAttachment to Module 3
Attachment to Module 3 These Procedures were designed with an eye toward timely and efficient dispute resolution. As part of the New gtld Program, these Procedures apply to all proceedings administered
More informationRules for CNNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (2012)
Rules for CNNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (2012) Chapter I General Provisions and Definitions Article 1 In order to ensure the fairness, convenience and promptness of a domain name dispute
More informationFRL Registry BV. Terms & Conditions for the registration and usage of.frl domain names
FRL Registry BV Terms & Conditions for the registration and usage of.frl domain names p. 1 Table of Contents.FRL TERMS & CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS INTRODUCTION; SCOPE OF APPLICATION ARTICLE
More informationAppendix I UDRP. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. (As Approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999)
Appendix I UDRP Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (As Approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999) 1. Purpose. This Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy") has been adopted by
More informationPROPOSED.AU DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) AND RULES. auda Dispute Resolution Working Group. May 2001
PROPOSED.AU DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) AND RULES auda Dispute Resolution Working Group May 2001 1. Background In 2000, the auda Board established two Advisory Panels: ƒ Name Policy Advisory Panel,
More information.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES Page 1 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. Definitions, scope of application and eligibility... 3 Article 1. Definitions... 3 Article 2. Scope of application... 7
More informationANNEX 1: Registry Reserved Names. Capitalized terms have the meaning as specified in Article 1 of the.vistaprint Domain Name Registration Policies.
ANNEX 1: Registry Reserved Names Article 1. Definitions Capitalized terms have the meaning as specified in Article 1 of the.vistaprint Domain Name Registration Policies. Article 2. General list of Registry
More informationDomain Name Dispute Resolution Policies
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policies Charter Eligibility Dispute Resolution Policy Rules The CEDRP Rules will be followed by all CEDRP Providers. The CEDRP Rules are developed by the CEDRP Providers
More informationEligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution for Domain Names ( ERDRP )
Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution for Domain Names ( ERDRP ) FORUM s ERDRP Supplemental Rules THE FORUM s SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY To view
More informationHong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.hk and. 香港 domain names Rules of Procedure
Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.hk and. 香港 domain names Rules of Procedure [Effective 22 February 2011] Arbitration proceedings for the resolution
More informationThe Five (or More) Forums for Your Trademark Dispute, and How to Choose the Right One (Hint: Don t Choose the ITC)
The Five (or More) Forums for Your Trademark Dispute, and How to Choose the Right One (Hint: Don t Choose the ITC) Travis R. Wimberly Senior Associate June 27, 2018 AustinIPLA Overview of Options Federal
More informationTHE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES (IN EFFECT AS OF 31 JULY 2015)
THE ASIAN DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO THE INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS (ICANN) UNIFORM DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY AND THE RULES FOR THE
More information(i) the data provided in the domain name registration application is true, correct, up to date and complete,
TUCOWS.BIZ domain APPLICATION SERVICE TERMS OF USE 1. AGREEMENT. In this Registration Agreement ("Agreement") "you" and "your" refer to the registrant of each domain name registration, "we", us" and "our"
More informationSeptember 17, Dear Mr. Jeffrey,
ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l OMPI WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center September 17, 2009 Dear
More informationURS DETERMINATION (URS Procedure 9, URS Rules 13)
URS DISPUTE NO. D5C230DE Determination DEFAULT I. PARTIES URS DETERMINATION (URS Procedure 9, URS Rules 13) Complainant: Sks365 Malta Ltd., MT Complainant's authorized representative(s): Fabio Maggesi,
More informationDOMAIN NAMES REGISTRANT AGREEMENT
DOMAIN NAMES REGISTRANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT COVERS ALL OTHER DOMAINS -.COM,.NET,.ORG, ETC 1. AGREEMENT. In this Registration Agreement ("Agreement") "you" and "your" refer to each customer, "we",
More information"We", "us" and "our" refers to Register Matrix, trading as registermatrix.com.
Terms and Conditions Registration Agreement (last revision 22 March, 2017) "We", "us" and "our" refers to Register Matrix, trading as registermatrix.com. This Registration Agreement ("Agreement") sets
More informationNATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. Advertising Magic, Inc. v. Ad Magic Inc., d/b/a Ad Magic c/o Shari Spiro Claim Number: FA
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Advertising Magic, Inc. v. Ad Magic Inc., d/b/a Ad Magic c/o Shari Spiro Claim Number: FA0701000894041 PARTIES Complainant is Advertising Magic, Inc. ( Complainant ),
More informationDRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER
DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER Working Group Charter for a Policy Development Process for IGO and INGO Access to Curative Rights Protections WG Name: IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Working
More informationFinal Issue Report on IGO-INGO Access to the UDRP & URS Date: 25 May 2014
FINAL ISSUE REPORT ON AMENDING THE UNIFORM DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY AND THE UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION PROCEDURE FOR ACCESS BY PROTECTED INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL NON- GOVERNMENTAL
More informationThe FORUM s Supplemental Rules to ICANN s Registrar Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy (TDRP)
The FORUM s Supplemental Rules to ICANN s Registrar Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy (TDRP) 1) Definitions 2) Scope a) The Policy means the Registrar Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy, approved by the
More informationTUCOWS.INFO domain APPLICATION SERVICE TERMS OF USE
TUCOWS.INFO domain APPLICATION SERVICE TERMS OF USE 1. AGREEMENT. In this Registration Agreement ("Agreement") "you" and "your" refer to the registrant of each domain name registration, "we", us" and "our"
More informationForm of Registration Agreement
EXHIBIT A Form of Registration Agreement 1. AGREEMENT. In this Registration Agreement ("Agreement") "you" and "your" refer to the registrant of each domain name registration, "we", us" and "our" refer
More information.Brand TLD Designation Application
.Brand TLD Designation Application Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ( ICANN ) 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90094 Attention: New gtld Program Staff RE: Application
More informationCPR Institute for Dispute Resolution
CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution COMPLAINANT Name Smart Auctions Inc. Address 1584 Buttitta Drive, Unit #128 File Number: CPR0325 Address Streamwood, IL 606107 Telephone 312.842.1500 Date of Commencement:
More informationRegistration Agreement. Additional terms and conditions for the registration of.london domain names.
Registration Agreement Additional terms and conditions for the registration of.london domain names. This.LONDON Registration Agreement (the Agreement ) is entered into by and between a.london Domain Name
More informationIsrael Discount Bank Ltd v. Modi Okla
Israel Discount Bank Ltd v. Modi Okla IL-DRP Panel Decision 1. The Parties The Complainant is Israel Discount Bank Ltd., of Tel Aviv, Israel, represented by Fischer, Behar, Chen, Well, Orion & Co. Law
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter
More informationDispute Resolution for Domain Names
Dispute Resolution for Domain Names Supplemental Rules THE FORUM'S SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO CENTRALNIC S DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1. Definitions (a) The Rules means the Rules for the CentralNic
More information1. Scope of WIPO Rules for New gtld Dispute Resolution in Relation to Procedure
World Intellectual Property Organization Rules for New gtld Dispute Resolution for Existing Legal Rights Objections ( WIPO Rules for New gtld Dispute Resolution ) (In effect as of June 20, 2011) 1. Scope
More informationComplaint Resolution Service (CRS)
Complaint Resolution Service (CRS) Policy, Procedure and Complaint Form 1. Statement of Purpose 1.1. This Complaint Resolution Service ( Service ) provides a transparent, efficient and cost effective way
More informationRegistry-Registrar Agreement.FRL
Registry-Registrar Agreement.FRL Version Control Version 1.2 november 2014 Version 1.3 december 2014 Version 1.4 march 2015 Registry Registrar Agreement.FRL p. 1 Table of Contents REGISTRY-REGISTRAR AGREEMENT
More informationIf you are registering the domain for a third party, you further agree that they have read and agree to the Nominet T&Cs as well.
Domain name terms and conditions The following terms and conditions apply to the domain registration service: Governing Bodies Blue spark Ltd ( blue spark ) provides domain registration services for second-level
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :-cv-0-rbl Document Filed // Page of 0 0 COMPLAINT [Case No. :-cv-0] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA STANLEY PACE, an individual, v. Plaintiff, JORAN
More informationThe new gtlds - rights protection mechanisms
The new gtlds - rights protection mechanisms Tony Willoughby Johannesburg 14 April 2014 Session Outline Pre-Delegation Objection Mechanisms Trade Mark Clearing House ( TMCH ) Uniform Rapid Suspension (
More informationExhibit A. Registration Agreement
Exhibit A Registration Agreement 1. AGREEMENT. In this Registration Agreement ("Agreement") "you" and "your" refers to the registrant of each domain name registration, "we", us" and "our" refers to Tucows
More informationDETERMINATION OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE (BGC) RECONSIDERATION REQUEST APRIL 2014
DETERMINATION OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE (BGC) RECONSIDERATION REQUEST 14-9 29 APRIL 2014 The Requester, Merck KGaA, seeks reconsideration of the Expert Determinations, and ICANN s acceptance of
More informationSECTION 1 INTRODUCTORY RULES...
Preamble This Arbitration Procedure has been prepared by Engineers Ireland principally for use in disputes arising out of engineering work, and in particular construction Contracts. However its use is
More informationDispute Resolution Service Policy
Dispute Resolution Service Policy 1. Definitions Abusive Registration means a Domain Name which either: i. was registered or otherwise acquired in a manner which, at the time when the registration or acquisition
More informationCPR Institute for Dispute Resolution
CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution 366 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017-3122 Tel. (212) 949-6490 Fax (212) 949-8859 cprneutrals@cpradr.org www.cpradr.org COMPLAINANT Poker.com, Inc. #210-1166 Alberni
More informationIn the matter of the Domain <Noam-kuris.co.il>
IL-DRP PANEL FOR THE INTERNET SOCIETY OF ISRAEL In the matter of the Domain between Mr. Noam Kuris, Adv. P.o.box 6210 Tel aviv noamkuris@gmail.com (The Petitioner ) and Mr. Arie Sheffer
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00-cjc-kes Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #:0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 0 VIRTUALPOINT, INC., v. Plaintiff, POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS,
More informationDRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER
DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER Working Group Charter for a Policy Development Process for IGO and INGO Access to Curative Rights Protections WG Name: IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Working
More informationDUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY Introductory Provisions. Article (1) Definitions
DUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY 2011 Introductory Provisions Article (1) Definitions 1.1 The following words and phrases shall have the meaning assigned thereto unless
More informationDispute Resolution Service Procedure
Dispute Resolution Service Procedure DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICE POLICY VERSION 3 - JULY 2008 (APPLIES TO ALL DISPUTES FILED ON OR AFTER 29 JULY 2008) (VERSION 2 APPLIED TO DISPUTES FILED BETWEEN 25 OCTOBER
More informationRESOLUTION OF DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES THROUGH ADR - IMPACT OF WIPO S INITIATIVE TOWARDS eudrp. I Introduction
80 RESOLUTION OF DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES THROUGH ADR - IMPACT OF WIPO S INITIATIVE TOWARDS eudrp I Introduction THE MAGNIFICATION of e-commerce has given means to various businesses to exist in the world
More informationICANN s Contractual Compliance Program. Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ICANN s Contractual Compliance Program Tuesday, 25 October 2011 1 Agenda q General Updates q Overview of Activities q Going Forward q Feedback 2 Our Vision, Mission and Approach ICANN s Vision One World.
More informationTerms and Conditions
Terms and Conditions Registration Agreement (last revision January 25, 2018) "We", "us" and "our" refers to Internet Domain Service BS Corp., trading as Internet.bs. This Registration Agreement ("Agreement")
More informationPANEL DECISION B2(c)(3)of the.eu Dispute Resolution Rules (ADR Rules)
ADR Center for.eu attached to the Czech Arbitration Court attached to the Economic Chamber of the Czech Republic and Agricultural Chamber of the Czech Republic (Czech Arbitration Court) PANEL DECISION
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES
DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES First Issued: March 1998 Amended: November 1999 Amended: July 2000 Amended: September 2001 Amended: September 2003 Amended: October 2004 Amended: May 2005 Amended: September 2005
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationThe Uniform Domain Name Dispute
FOREWORD The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the UDRP) was devised to achieve several objectives. First and foremost, the objective was to provide a dispute resolution process as an alternative
More informationExhibit A. Registration Agreement
Exhibit A Registration Agreement 1. AGREEMENT. In this Registration Agreement ("Agreement") "you" and "your" refers to the registrant of each domain name registration, "we", us" and "our" refers to Tucows
More informationPreliminary GNSO Issue Report on The Current State of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy
Preliminary GNSO Issue Report on The Current State of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy STATUS OF THIS DOCUMENT This is the Preliminary Issue Report on the current state of the Uniform Dispute Resolution
More information.au Registrant Agreement
.au Registrant Agreement Version 3.0 VentraIP Australia Pty Ltd PO Box 119 Beaconsfield VIC 3807 customercare@ventraip.com.au www.ventraip.com.au This document was last updated on 20 April 2016. 2016 VentraIP
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationRULES FOR DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION
BELGIAN CENTER FOR ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION RULES FOR DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION In force as from the 1 st of January 2011 CEPANI NON-PROFIT ASSOCIATION rue des Sols 8 1000 Brussels Telephone: +32-2-515.08.35
More informationAXTONE S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE AND DELIVERY
AXTONE S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE AND DELIVERY 1. LIST OF DEFINITIONS 1.1. The capitalized terms used in these General Terms and Conditions of Sale and Delivery have the meaning ascribed
More information