The FORUM s Supplemental Rules to ICANN s Registrar Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy (TDRP)
|
|
- Dwayne Hunt
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The FORUM s Supplemental Rules to ICANN s Registrar Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy (TDRP) 1) Definitions 2) Scope a) The Policy means the Registrar Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy, approved by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers on July 12, b) The FORUM also refers to the National Arbitration Forum. The FORUM will apply the Policy and the FORUM s Supplemental Rules in effect at the time a Request for Enforcement is submitted. The FORUM s Supplemental Rules may be amended by the FORUM in its sole discretion. 3) Communications All communications must be directed to the FORUM and not to the Panel. 4) The Request for Enforcement a) The Request for Enforcement must include all elements listed in Paragraph 3.1 of the Policy and may not exceed ten (10) pages. b) In accordance with Paragraph 3.1.2(ix) of the Policy, the Filing Registrar must send or transmit its Request for Enforcement to the Respondent under cover of the Request for Enforcement Transmittal Cover Sheet posted on the FORUM's website. c) The Request for Enforcement must be sent to the FORUM by (domaindispute@adrforum.com) in accordance with Paragraph of the Policy. d) The Request for Enforcement must designate whether the Filing Registrar elects to have the dispute decided by a single-member or a three-member Panel and, in the event the Filing Registrar elects a three-member Panel, provide the names and contact details of three candidates to serve as one of the Panelists (these candidates may be drawn from any ICANNapproved Provider's list of panelists). 5) The Response a) The Response must include all elements listed in Paragraph 3.2 of the Policy and may not exceed ten (10) pages. b) The Response must be sent to the FORUM by (domaindispute@adrforum.com). c) If the Filing Registrar has elected a single-member Panel in the Request for Enforcement (see Paragraph 4(d)), the Response must state whether the Respondent elects instead to have the dispute decided by a three-member Panel. If either the Filing Registrar or the Respondent elects a three-member Panel, the Response must provide the names and contact details of three candidates to serve as one of the Panelists (these candidates may be drawn from any ICANN-approved Provider's list of panelists). 6) Extension for Filing a Response a) Paragraph of the Policy, as applied by the FORUM through Paragraph of the Policy, provides that the Respondent may request additional time to submit a Response from the FORUM, or may be given additional time if the parties stipulate to an extension and the FORUM
2 approves. Any request by the Respondent for an extension or any joint request by the parties for an extension must: i) be submitted after the parties have first conferred with each other to see if they could reach an agreement concerning the requested extension; be submitted in writing to the FORUM and the parties within the time for the Response to be submitted; i state the exceptional circumstances warranting the request for an extension; iv) state the length of the extension being requested (no more than five (5) calendar days); and v) be accompanied by an extension fee of $100. b) The FORUM may exercise its discretion in determining whether exceptional circumstances exist warranting an extension and, if so, the length of the extension. No request for an extension will be approved if any of the conditions set forth in Paragraph 6(a) of the Supplemental Rules have not been performed. 7) Submission of other Written Statements and Documents; No Amendment to the Request for Enforcement a) A party may submit additional written statements and documents to the FORUM and the opposing party(s) within five (5) calendar days after the date the Response was submitted or the last date the Response was due to be submitted to the FORUM, whichever occurs first. b) Each submission must: i) be timely received by the FORUM; be accompanied by an additional submission fee of $250; i include proof of service of these submissions upon the opposing party(s); iv) be submitted in electronic form to the FORUM and the opposing party(s). c) The opposing party may respond in electronic form to an additional submission filed in accordance with Supplemental Rule 7(a); such response must be submitted to the FORUM and the opposing party(s) within five (5) calendar days after the date the additional submission was submitted. d) Additional submissions and responses to additional submissions may not amend the original Request for Enforcement or Response. 8) The Record of the Administrative Proceeding a) In the case of a first-level dispute, the Request for Enforcement, Response, and additional written statements and documents provided in Paragraph 7 of these Supplemental Rules constitute the complete record to be considered by the Panel. b) In the case of an appeal of a first-level dispute decision or Registry Operator finding of No decision, the Panel shall also consider an Appeal submitted in accordance with Paragraph 4.3 of the Policy, along with any documentary evidence annexed in accordance with Paragraph ) Appointment of the Panel and Timing of Decision a) The FORUM will maintain and publish a list of Panelists and their qualifications to which any party will be directed on the FORUM's website, The FORUM will appoint a Panelist from this list to serve as a single-member Panel. b) If neither the Filing Registrar nor the Respondent has elected a three-member Panel (Paragraph 4(d) and 5(c)), the Provider shall appoint, within five (5) calendar days following receipt of the Response by the Provider, or the lapse of the time period for the submission thereof, a single Panelist from its list of Panelists. The fees for a single-member Panel shall be paid entirely by the Filing Registrar.
3 c) If either the Filing Registrar or the Respondent elects to have the dispute decided by a threemember Panel, the Provider shall appoint three Panelists in accordance with the procedures identified in Paragraph 9(e). The fees for a three-member Panel shall be paid in their entirety by the Filing Registrar, except where the election for a three-member Panel was made by the Respondent, in which case the applicable fees shall be shared equally between the Parties. d) Unless it has already elected a three-member Panel, the Filing Registrar shall submit to the Provider, within five (5) calendar days of communication of a Response in which the Respondent elects a three-member Panel, the names and contact details of three candidates to serve as one of the Panelists. These candidates may be drawn from any ICANN-approved Provider's list of panelists. e) In the event that either the Filing Registrar or the Respondent elects a three-member Panel, the Provider shall endeavor to appoint one Panelist from the list of candidates provided by each of the Filing Registrar and the Respondent. In the event the Provider is unable within five (5) calendar days to secure the appointment of a Panelist on its customary terms from either Party's list of candidates, the Provider shall make that appointment from its list of panelists. The third Panelist shall be appointed by the Provider from a list of five candidates submitted by the Provider to the Parties, the Provider's selection from among the five being made in a manner that reasonably balances the preferences of both Parties, as they may specify to the Provider within five (5) calendar days of the Provider's submission of the five-candidate list to the Parties. f) Once the entire Panel is appointed, the Provider shall notify the Parties of the Panelists appointed and the date by which, absent exceptional circumstances, the Panel shall forward its decision on the Request for Enforcement to the Provider. g) In cases involving a three-member Panel, the FORUM will select a Chair from the three-member Panel and will endeavor to select a Chair who was not from the list of Panelist candidates provided by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 6(e) of the Supplemental Rules. The Chair will sign all Orders and the Decision, coordinate and preside over the proceeding, and forward to the FORUM the Panel s decision, including any concurring or dissenting opinion as required by Paragraph 15 of the Supplemental Rules. h) In cases where the Filing Registrar requested a three-member Panel and no Response was submitted as required by Supplemental Rule 5(a), the Filing Registrar may be given the option of converting the three-member Panel to a single-member Panel: i) After the time for the Response has expired, the FORUM will notify the Filing Registrar that no Response was submitted and that the Filing Registrar may convert its threemember Panel request to a single-member Panel request; Within five (5) calendar days of this notification, the Filing Registrar, by to the FORUM, may request that the three-member Panel be converted to a single-member Panel; i If a single-member Panel is requested, the FORUM will select a Panelist from its list of Panelists, not on the list of Panelists submitted by the Filing Registrar; and iv) If a single-member Panel conducts the administrative hearing, the Filing Registrar will be reimbursed $1,000 of its hearing fee. i) If the Filing Registrar fails to request that the three-member Panel be converted to a singlemember Panel as provided in paragraph 9(h)( above, the selection of the three-member Panel will be as follows: i) The Filing Registrar must provide a list of three candidates and the FORUM will endeavor to select a Panelist from that list as provided in Supplemental Rule 9(e); The FORUM will select a Panelist from its list of Panel members; and i The FORUM will submit to the parties a list of five candidates and will select a Panelist as provided in Supplemental Rule 9(e). j) In cases where the Respondent requested a three-member Panel and the Request for Enforcement is withdrawn prior to the appointment of a Panel, the Respondent will be reimbursed $1,000 of its hearing fee.
4 10) Impartiality and Independence a) All FORUM Panelists will take an oath to be neutral and independent. b) A Panelist will be disqualified if circumstances exist that create a conflict of interest or cause the Panelist to be unfair and biased, including but not limited to the following: i) The Panelist has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts; The Panelist has served as an attorney to any party or the Panelist has been associated with an attorney who has represented a party during that association; i The Panelist, individually or as a fiduciary, or the Panelist s spouse or minor child residing in the Panelist s household, has a direct financial interest in a matter before the Panelist; iv) The Panelist or the Panelist s spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person: (1) Is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a Party; or (2) Is acting as a lawyer or representative in the proceeding. c) A party may challenge the selection of a Panelist, provided that a decision has not already been published, by filing with the FORUM a written request stating the circumstances and specific reasons for the disqualification. d) A request to challenge must be filed in writing with the Director of Arbitration within five (5) days of the date of receipt of the notice of the selection. e) Provided a decision has not already been published by the selected Panelist, the FORUM will promptly review the challenge and determine whether circumstances exist requiring Panelist disqualification in accord with this Supplemental Rule. 11) Communications Between Parties and the Panel 12) Withdrawal a) No party may directly communicate with a Panelist. b) The parties may communicate with the Case Coordinator assigned to their proceeding by phone, fax, , or mail through the United States Postal Service. c) Any request by a party for any type of action by the FORUM or Panel must be communicated in writing to the FORUM and the opposing party(s). a) Prior to Commencement i) The Filing Registrar may withdraw the Request for Enforcement without prejudice. A withdrawal request must be submitted to the FORUM in writing and signed by the Filing Registrar. The Filing Registrar may re-initiate the same proceeding within thirty (30) calendar days after a pre-commencement withdrawal. A re-initiation fee of $100 must accompany the request to re-initiate the proceeding. i If the Filing Registrar does not re-initiate the Request for Enforcement, at the end of thirty (30) calendar days the Request for Enforcement is withdrawn without prejudice and the administrative proceeding is terminated. Any subsequent Request for Enforcement will be treated as a new Request for Enforcement and must be accompanied by payment of the appropriate fees. b) After Commencement and Prior to Response: After commencement, but before the FORUM has received a Response that complies with Supplemental Rule 5, the Request for Enforcement may be withdrawn without prejudice by the Filing Registrar. A withdrawal request must be submitted to the FORUM in writing and signed by the Filing Registrar. c) After Response Received: After a Response that complies with Supplemental Rule 5 has been received by the FORUM, but before a Panel decision is published, the Request for Enforcement
5 may be withdrawn with prejudice if both parties agree to the withdrawal. A withdrawal request must be submitted to the FORUM in writing and signed by both parties. d) The Request for Enforcement cannot be withdrawn after a Panel decision is published. 13) Panel Decisions Panel decisions will meet the requirements set forth, in the case of an initial request for enforcement, in Paragraph of the Policy or, in the case of an appeal of a first-level dispute decision or a Registry Operator finding of No Decision, in Paragraph of the Policy, and will be of a length that the Panel deems appropriate. 14) Correction of Clerical Mistakes Clerical mistakes or errors in the Panel s decision arising from oversight or omission by the Panel may be corrected by the Director of Arbitration for the FORUM. 15) Communication of Decision to Parties; Publication of Decision The FORUM will publish the decision by submitting the Panel s decision to the parties, the Registry Operator, and ICANN as required by the Policy. 16) Fees (U.S. Dollars) a) Hearing Fees Number of Disputed Domain Names Single-Member Panel Three-Member Panel 1 $1,150 $2,500 2 $1,300 $2, $1,400 $2, $1,750 $3, $2,000 $4, or more To be determined in consultation with the FORUM. To be determined in consultation with the FORUM. b) Participatory hearings: In exceptional circumstances (for example, in the event an in-person hearing is held), the FORUM may require the Parties to pay additional fees, which will be established by agreement of the Parties and the Director of Arbitration for the FORUM prior to the appointment of the Panel. c) Non-Refundable Fees:
6 17) Effective Date Fees to be paid to the FORUM as provided in these Supplemental Rules must be paid in U.S. dollars and are non-refundable, except as required by Paragraph 4.4 of the Policy. These Supplemental Rules apply to all cases filed on or after November 12, Contact the FORUM at with any questions or call (800)
Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution for Domain Names ( ERDRP )
Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution for Domain Names ( ERDRP ) FORUM s ERDRP Supplemental Rules THE FORUM s SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY To view
More informationDispute Resolution for Domain Names
Dispute Resolution for Domain Names Supplemental Rules THE FORUM'S SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO CENTRALNIC S DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1. Definitions (a) The Rules means the Rules for the CentralNic
More informationTHE FORUM's SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO ICANN S TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE AND RULES
THE FORUM's SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO ICANN S TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE AND RULES Supplemental Rules 1. Definitions (a) The Rules means the Rules for the Trademark Post-Delegation
More informationRULES FOR NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM S SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
RULES FOR NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM S SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1. Definitions (a) The Policy means s Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy ( SDRP ). (b) The Rules means the rules in this document.
More informationRules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( the Rules )
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( the Rules ) On 17 May 2018 the ICANN Board adopted a Temporary Specification for gtld Registration Data ("Temporary Specification"). The content
More information.VERSICHERUNG. Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names
.VERSICHERUNG Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names Overview Chapter I - Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP)... 2 1. Purpose...
More informationHong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.hk and. 香港 domain names Rules of Procedure
Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.hk and. 香港 domain names Rules of Procedure [Effective 22 February 2011] Arbitration proceedings for the resolution
More informationdotberlin GmbH & Co. KG
Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) 1. This policy has been adopted by all accredited Domain Name Registrars for Domain Names ending in.berlin. 2. The policy is between the Registrar
More informationRules for CNNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (2012)
Rules for CNNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (2012) Chapter I General Provisions and Definitions Article 1 In order to ensure the fairness, convenience and promptness of a domain name dispute
More informationDomain Name Dispute Resolution Policies
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policies Charter Eligibility Dispute Resolution Policy Rules The CEDRP Rules will be followed by all CEDRP Providers. The CEDRP Rules are developed by the CEDRP Providers
More informationBusiness Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.
RRDRP Rules These Rules are in effect for all RRDRP proceedings. Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Registry Restrictions Dispute Resolution Procedure shall be governed
More informationTHE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES (IN EFFECT AS OF 31 JULY 2015)
THE ASIAN DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO THE INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS (ICANN) UNIFORM DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY AND THE RULES FOR THE
More informationBusiness Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.
PDDRP Rule These Rules are in effect for all PDDRP proceedings. Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Trademark Post- Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure shall be governed
More informationAttachment to Module 3
Attachment to Module 3 These Procedures were designed with an eye toward timely and efficient dispute resolution. As part of the New gtld Program, these Procedures apply to all proceedings administered
More informationa) to take account of the policy rules that apply to.au domain names, that do not apply to gtld domain names; and
auda PUBLISHED POLICY Policy Title:.au DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) Policy No: 2010-05 Publication Date: 13/08/2010 Status: Current 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 This document sets out the.au Dispute Resolution
More informationWills and Trusts Arbitration RULES
Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES Effective September 15, 2005 Introduction Standard Arbitration Clause Administrative Fees Wills and Trusts Arbitration Rules 1. Incorporation of These Rules into a Will
More informationDear ICANN, Best regards, ADR.EU, Czech Arbitration Court
Dear ICANN, ADR.EU center of the Czech Arbitration Court has prepared a proposal for a new process within UDRP. Please find attached proposed amendments of our UDRP Supplemental Rules which we submit for
More informationdotcoop will cancel, transfer, or otherwise make changes to domain name registrations as rendered by a WIPO ruling.
.coop Dispute Policy Basic Philosophy: First Come, First Served When an eligible cooperative claims a domain name, they are doing so guided by the desire to claim the name they have considered, planned
More informationWills and Trusts Arbitration RULES
Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2009 Introduction Standard Arbitration Clause Administrative Fees Wills and Trusts Arbitration Rules 1. Incorporation of These Rules
More informationSUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
The Registry has developed and adopted this Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ) which is to be read together with other Registry Policies, the Registry-Registrar Agreement, the Registration
More information.CREDITUNION SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
1. Scope and Purpose.CREDITUNION SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY CUNA Performance Resources, LLC (CPR) is the Registry Operator of the.creditunion top-level domain (TLD), and this Sunrise Dispute Resolution
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationSeptember 17, Dear Mr. Jeffrey,
ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l OMPI WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center September 17, 2009 Dear
More informationEffective September 1, 2018 TABLE OF RULES II. TRANSFER TO ARBITRATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF ARBITRATOR
JEFFERSON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT LOCAL CIVIL ARBITRATION RULES Effective September 1, 2018 TABLE OF RULES I. SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF RULES 1.1 Application of Rules 1.2 Matters Subject to Arbitration 1.3 Relationship
More informationPROPOSED.AU DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) AND RULES. auda Dispute Resolution Working Group. May 2001
PROPOSED.AU DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) AND RULES auda Dispute Resolution Working Group May 2001 1. Background In 2000, the auda Board established two Advisory Panels: ƒ Name Policy Advisory Panel,
More informationDispute Resolution Service Procedure
Dispute Resolution Service Procedure DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICE POLICY VERSION 3 - JULY 2008 (APPLIES TO ALL DISPUTES FILED ON OR AFTER 29 JULY 2008) (VERSION 2 APPLIED TO DISPUTES FILED BETWEEN 25 OCTOBER
More informationREGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 REVISED - NOVEMBER 2010
REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 REVISED - NOVEMBER 2010 1. Parties to the Dispute The parties to the dispute will be the harmed organization or individual and the gtld registry
More information1. Scope of WIPO Rules for New gtld Dispute Resolution in Relation to Procedure
World Intellectual Property Organization Rules for New gtld Dispute Resolution for Existing Legal Rights Objections ( WIPO Rules for New gtld Dispute Resolution ) (In effect as of June 20, 2011) 1. Scope
More informationRules for NY Workers' Compensation Health Insurers' Match Program (HIMP)
Rules for NY Workers' Compensation Health Insurers' Match Program (HIMP) Updated: 3/1/07 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 2 RULES FOR THE ARBITRATION OF DISPUTED REQUESTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT BY HEALTH INSURERS
More informationSunrise and DPML Dispute Resolution Policy
Sunrise and DPML Dispute Resolution Policy This document describes the rules that Rightside will use when resolving Sunrise and DPML disputes. Copyright 2015 Rightside Registry Copyright 2014 Rightside
More informationNew Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2011)
New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2011) Effective April 1, 2011 ADMINISTERED BY FORTHRIGHT New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules 2 PART I Rules of General Application... 5 1. Scope of Rules...
More informationRULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Definitions. As used in these rules: (A) Arbitration means a process whereby a neutral third person, called an arbitrator, considers
More information.REIT REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY RECONSIDERATION POLICY
.REIT REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY RECONSIDERATION POLICY Proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Eligibility Reconsideration Policy ( ERP ), as set forth in Section 5 of the.reit Registry Policies
More informationThe court annexed arbitration program.
NEVADA ARBITRATION RULES (Rules Governing Alternative Dispute Resolution, Part B) (effective July 1, 1992; as amended effective January 1, 2008) Rule 1. The court annexed arbitration program. The Court
More informationLOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, Preamble
LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, 2010 Preamble The purpose of the Lawyer Dispute Resolution Program is to give timely, reasonable,
More informationREGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 19 SEPTEMBER 2011
REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 19 SEPTEMBER 2011 1. Parties to the Dispute The parties to the dispute will be the harmed established institution and the gtld registry operator.
More informationComplaint Resolution Service (CRS)
Complaint Resolution Service (CRS) Policy, Procedure and Complaint Form 1. Statement of Purpose 1.1. This Complaint Resolution Service ( Service ) provides a transparent, efficient and cost effective way
More informationNew Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration RULES. Effective May 1, New Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration Rules
New Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration RULES Effective May 1, 2003 1. New Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration Rules New Jersey automobile insurance law was amended in 1998 to require that all automobile
More informationALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES
KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES 00015541-3 Page 1 of Attachment A to Asbestos TDP KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
More informationTRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012
TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012 1. Parties to the Dispute The parties to the dispute will be the trademark holder and the gtld registry operator. ICANN
More informationRULES FOR DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION
BELGIAN CENTER FOR ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION RULES FOR DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION In force as from the 1 st of January 2011 CEPANI NON-PROFIT ASSOCIATION rue des Sols 8 1000 Brussels Telephone: +32-2-515.08.35
More informationAPG ASBESTOS TRUST. 1. A copy of these ADR Procedures; 2. Form Affidavit of Completeness; 3. Election Form and Agreement for Binding Arbitration; and
APG ASBESTOS TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES Pursuant to Section 5.10 of the First Amended and Restated APG Asbestos Trust Distribution Procedures (the TDP ), the APG Asbestos Trust
More informationAmerican Bible Society DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy
American Bible Society DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy The American Bible Society ( ABS or Registry ) hereby incorporates this DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy ( DCDRP ) by reference
More informationNASSAU COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION PANELS ARBITRATION RULES
NASSAU COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION PANELS ARBITRATION RULES 1. Definitions: a. Mediation and Arbitration Panels. The Nassau County Bar Association ("Association") has established the
More informationFinancial Dispute Resolution Centre Financial Dispute Resolution Scheme. Mediation and Arbitration Rules. February 2014
Financial Dispute Resolution Centre Financial Dispute Resolution Scheme Mediation and Arbitration Rules February 2014 Financial Dispute Resolution Centre Unit 3701 4, 37/F, Sunlight Tower, 248 Queen s
More informationDUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY Introductory Provisions. Article (1) Definitions
DUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY 2011 Introductory Provisions Article (1) Definitions 1.1 The following words and phrases shall have the meaning assigned thereto unless
More informationCALIFORNIA YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION
CALIFORNIA YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION The California Yacht Brokers Association was established on January 29, 1975 as a non-profit, unincorporated association of yacht brokers, salespersons and others dedicated
More informationDominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy
Dominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Dominion Registries Registration Policy. This SDRP is effective
More informationConstruction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes)
Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2009 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective
More informationAAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)
APPENDIX 4 AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes) Commercial Mediation Procedures M-1. Agreement of Parties Whenever, by
More informationLOCAL RULES FOR MANDATORY ARBITRATION 1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF RULES
LOCAL RULES FOR MANDATORY ARBITRATION 1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF RULES LMAR 1.1 APPLICATION OF RULES The purpose of mandatory arbitration of civil actions under chapter 7.06 RCW, as implemented by the Mandatory
More informationNational Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS
National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Important Notice...3 Introduction...3 Standard Clause...3 Submission Agreement...3 Administrative
More informationERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS
ERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS SECTION I - INTRODUCTORY RULES Scope of Application Article 1 1. Pursuant to Article 5, paragraph
More informationLABOUR ARBITRATION RULES
THE INSTITUTE of ARBITRATORS & MEDIATORS AUSTRALIA ACN 008 520 045 ARBITRATORS MEDIATORS CONCILIATORS LABOUR ARBITRATION RULES Preamble The preferred method of resolving a dispute between an employer and
More informationNY PIP Rules. Effective February 1, 2009
NY PIP Rules Effective February 1, 2009 What follows are the Procedures that apply to the mandatory intercompany arbitration process pursuant to Section 65-4.11(d) of the New York State Insurance Department
More informationREGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1.0 Title: Registration Eligibility Dispute Resolution Policy Version Control: 1.0 Date of Implementation: 2016-01-20 2.0 Summary This Registration Eligibility
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE UNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE UNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL (As adopted by the General Assembly in Resolution 64/119 on 16 December 2009 and amended by the General Assembly in Resolution 66/107 on 9 December
More information[.onl] Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy
[.onl] Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registration Agreement. This SDRP is effective as of January 2, 2014. An
More informationINDIAN TECHNOLOGY MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION CENTER (ITMAC)
INDIAN TECHNOLOGY MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION CENTER (ITMAC) The Indian Technology Mediation and Arbitration Center (ITMAC) is India s first and niche Mediation And Arbitration Center dedicated to Information
More informationJAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures
JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures Effective September 1, 2016 JAMS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION RULES JAMS International and JAMS provide arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of
More informationARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL
ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE RULES AS PART OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT PAGES 1.1 Application... 1 1.2 Scope... 1 II. TRIBUNALS AND ADMINISTRATION 2.1 Name
More informationCODE OF PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES
6465 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 470 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Phone: 800-474-2371 Fax: 952-345-1160 www.adrforum.com CODE OF PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES April 1, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...
More informationINTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES (Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules) Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 available online at icdr.org Table of Contents Introduction.... 5 International
More informationCommercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)
Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2013 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective June 1,
More informationASEAN PROTOCOL ON ENHANCED DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM WORKING PROCEDURES FOR APPELLATE REVIEW (drawn up pursuant to paragraph 8 of Article 12 of the Protocol) Definitions 1. In these Working Procedures
More informationAppendix I UDRP. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. (As Approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999)
Appendix I UDRP Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (As Approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999) 1. Purpose. This Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy") has been adopted by
More informationRules Of Arbitration Of The Alternative Dispute Resolution Tribunal Of The Bar Association Of Nassau County, N.Y., Inc.
Rules Of Arbitration Of The Alternative Dispute Resolution Tribunal Of The Bar Association Of Nassau County, N.Y., Inc. Part 137.Fee Dispute Resolution Program Attorney-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Program
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Order Adopting Amendments to the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Order Adopting Amendments to the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct The North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct is hereby amended to read as follows: Preamble
More informationDispute Resolution Service Policy
Dispute Resolution Service Policy 1. Definitions Abusive Registration means a Domain Name which either: i. was registered or otherwise acquired in a manner which, at the time when the registration or acquisition
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) 1. Scope of Application and Interpretation 1.1 Where parties have agreed to refer their disputes
More informationRULES OF ARBITRATION
RULES OF ARBITRATION IN FORCE AS FROM 1 NOVEMBER 2016 Palais Brongniart, 16 place de la Bourse, 75002 Paris, France www.delosdr.org. secretariat@delosdr.org MODEL CLAUSES... 2 SEAT AND LANGUAGES S CHEDULES
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES
DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES First Issued: March 1998 Amended: November 1999 Amended: July 2000 Amended: September 2001 Amended: September 2003 Amended: October 2004 Amended: May 2005 Amended: September 2005
More informationSponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans
Employee Benefit Plan Claims Arbitration RULES As Amended and Effective on January 1, 1988 Sponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Administered by the American Arbitration Association
More informationInvestments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference
Investments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference These Terms of Reference apply to those members of the Financial Ombudsman Service Limited who have been designated as having the Investments,
More informationPCT/GL/ISPE/1 Page 194 PART VIII CLERICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES. Chapter 22 Clerical and Administrative Procedures
Page 194 PART VIII CLERICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Chapter 22 Clerical and Administrative Procedures Receipt of the Demand Article 31(6)(a) 22.01 The International Preliminary Examining Authority
More informationSunrise Dispute Resolution Policy VERSION 1.0
Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy VERSION 1.0 This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registration Agreement. This SDRP is effective as of 12 th August
More informationRules for alternative dispute resolution procedures
RULES FOR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES 1 Rules for alternative dispute resolution procedures SYRELI EXPERT ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES FOR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
More informationCPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. Non-Administered. Arbitration Rules. Effective March 1, tel fax
CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES Non-Administered Arbitration Rules Effective March 1, 2018 tel +1.212.949.6490 fax +1.212.949.8859 www.cpradr.org CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution
More informationDraft Statute for an International Criminal Court 1994
Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court 1994 Text adopted by the Commission at its forty-sixth session, in 1994, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission s report covering
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. May 14, 2015
RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE May 14, 2015 INDEX PART 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 PART 2 GENERAL RULES... 2 Rule 1 How the Rules are Applied... 2 Applying the Rules... 2 Conflict with the Act... 2 Rule 2 Consequences
More informationConsolidated Arbitration Rules
Consolidated Arbitration Rules THE LEADING PROVIDER OF ADR SERVICES 1. Applicability of Rules The parties to a dispute shall be deemed to have made these Consolidated Arbitration Rules a part of their
More informationSTREET SW EDMONTON, AB T6X 1E9 Phone: Fax: SURFACE RIGHTS BOARD RULES
1229-91 STREET SW EDMONTON, AB T6X 1E9 Phone: 780-427-2444 Fax: 780-427-5798 SURFACE RIGHTS BOARD RULES RULES OF THE SURFACE RIGHTS BOARD TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule # PART 1: PURPOSE, APPLICATION OF RULES,
More information.XN--MGBCA7DZDO SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
.XN--MGBCA7DZDO SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registration Agreement. This SDRP is effective as of 29 July 2014.
More informationWIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER
For more information contact the: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Mediation Center Address: 34, chemin des Colombettes P.O. Box 18 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland WIPO ARBITRATION AND
More informationUNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 11 JANUARY 2012
UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 11 JANUARY 2012 DRAFT PROCEDURE 1. Complaint 1.1 Filing the Complaint a) Proceedings are initiated by electronically filing with a URS Provider a Complaint outlining
More informationCITY OF BELLINGHAM HEARING EXAMINER RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
CITY OF BELLINGHAM HEARING EXAMINER RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Section 1: General Provisions... 4 1.01 APPLICABILITY... 4 1.02 EFFECTIVE DATE... 4 1.03 INTERPRETATION OF RULES... 4 Section 2: Rules
More informationPrimary DNS Name : TOMCAT.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Primary DNS IP: Secondary DNS Name: SKYHAWK.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Secondary DNS IP:
2005 3 1/10 2005 3 2/10 Primary DNS Name : TOMCAT.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Primary DNS IP: 202.224.39.55 Secondary DNS Name: SKYHAWK.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Secondary DNS IP: 202.224.32.3 2005 3 3/10 2005 3 4/10 Registration
More informationArbitration Act B.E. 2545
1 (Translation) Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX., Given on the 23 rd day of April B.E. 2545 (2002) Being the 57 th Year of the Present Reign. His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej is graciously
More informationTrade Marks Regulations
35 Regulation 1. Citation 2. Commencement 3. Interpretation SAINT LUCIA No. 17 of 2003 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS PART I PRELIMINARY PART2 TRADE MARKS AND TRADE MARK RIGHTS 4. Classification of goods and
More informationNEBRASKA RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE. Adopted by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska April 15, 1997
NEBRASKA RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE Adopted by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska April 15, 1997 Effective Date April 15, 1997 NEBRASKA RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE TABLE
More informationREVISED AS OF MARCH 2014
REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014 JUDICATE WEST COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES RULE 1. INTENT AND OVERVIEW 1 RULE 1.A. INTENT 1 RULE 1.B. COMMITMENT TO EFFICIENT RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES 1 RULE 2. JURISDICTION 1 RULE
More informationCLIENT FEE DISPUTE ARBITRATION DOCUMENTS
Fee Dispute Arbitration Program Monroe County Bar Association One West Main Street, 10 th Floor Rochester, New York 14614 CLIENT FEE DISPUTE ARBITRATION DOCUMENTS Enclosed are the documents needed for
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) CONTENTS
CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope of Application and Interpretation 1 Rule 2 Notice, Calculation of Periods of Time 3 Rule 3 Notice of Arbitration 4 Rule 4 Response to Notice of Arbitration 6 Rule 5 Expedited Procedure
More informationStreamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures
RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding
More informationTop Level Design LLC January 22, 2015
Top Level Design LLC January 22, 2015 Defined Terms Definitions are provided in the definitions section of the Registry Registrar Agreement or as otherwise defined in the body of the Policy. Sunrise Dispute
More informationAssociation of Food Industries, Inc Route 66 Suite 205, Bldg. C Neptune, NJ Fax
Established 1906 Association of Food Industries, Inc. 3301 Route 66 Suite 205, Bldg. C Neptune, NJ 07753 732-922-3008 Fax 732-922-3590 www.afius.org info@afius.org Arbitration Rules Under the By-Laws of
More informationPANEL DECISION B2(c)(3)of the.eu Dispute Resolution Rules (ADR Rules)
ADR Center for.eu attached to the Czech Arbitration Court attached to the Economic Chamber of the Czech Republic and Agricultural Chamber of the Czech Republic (Czech Arbitration Court) PANEL DECISION
More informationArbitration Rules. Administered. Effective July 1, 2013 CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution
International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES Administered Arbitration Rules Effective July 1, 2013 30 East 33rd Street 6th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel +1.212.949.6490
More informationSunrise Dispute Resolution Policy
Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registration Agreement for the Amazon Registry Services, Inc. top-level domain.bot
More information