IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : :

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : :"

Transcription

1 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TD BANKNORTH SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL RECORD HOLDERS AND BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF COMMON STOCK OF TD BANKNORTH INC. ( TD BANKNORTH OR THE COMPANY ) AT ANY TIME FROM NOVEMBER 19, 2006 THROUGH AND INCLUDING APRIL 20, 2007, INCLUDING THEIR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, TRANSFEREES, AND ASSIGNEES OF ALL SUCH FOREGOING HOLDERS AND OWNERS, EXCLUDING DEFENDANTS, 1 PRIVATE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. ( PCM ), AND ARIEL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC ( ARIEL ) AND THEIR ASSOCIATES, AFFILIATES, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, TRANSFEREES, AND ASSIGNEES. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS ACTION. IF THE COURT APPROVES THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, YOU WILL BE FOREVER BARRED FROM CONTESTING THE FAIRNESS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OR PURSUING THE SETTLED CLAIMS (AS DEFINED BELOW). IF YOU HELD COMMON STOCK OF TD BANKNORTH FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO SUCH BENEFICIAL OWNER. I. PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE The purpose of this Notice of Pendency of Class Action, Proposed Settlement of Class Action, and Settlement Hearing ( Notice ) is to inform you of the pendency of the above-captioned action (the Action ) and the proposed settlement of the Action pending in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the Court ). A Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release dated April 10, 2009 (the Stipulation ) was entered into to reflect and embody the settlement (the Settlement ) agreed to by and between (i) plaintiffs and class representatives H. Louis Farmer, Jr. ( Farmer ), and City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police and Fire Retirement System (the Retirement System and together with Farmer, the Plaintiffs ), on their own behalf and on behalf of the Class (as hereinafter defined), and (ii) defendants TD Banknorth, Robert G. Clarke, P. Kevin Condron, John Otis Drew, Brian M. Flynn, Joanna T. Lau, Dana S. Levenson, Steven T. Martin, John M. Naughton, Irving E. Rogers III, David A. Rosow, Curtis M. Scribner, Peter G. Vigue, and Gerry S. Weidema (the Independent Directors ), The Toronto-Dominion Bank ( TD ), William J. Ryan, William E. Bennett, W. Edmund Clark, Bharat B. Masrani, and Wilbur J. Prezzano (together with TD, the Toronto-Dominion Defendants and together with TD Banknorth and the Independent Directors, the Defendants ). This Notice also informs you of your right to participate in a hearing to be held on June 25, 2009, before the Court in the New Castle County Courthouse, 500 North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware (the Settlement Hearing ). At the Settlement Hearing, the Court will, among other things, (i) determine whether the Court s prior certification of the Class should be made final; (ii) determine whether the Settlement should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class; and (iii) consider the application of Current Counsel (as that term is defined herein) for an award of attorneys fees and expenses. On November 20, 2006, TD Banknorth announced that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement with TD providing for TD s acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of TD Banknorth not yet owned by TD for $32.33 per share in cash (the Going- Private Transaction ). The Going-Private Transaction closed on April 20, On July 24, 2008, the Court determined that the Action shall be maintained as a class action under Court of Chancery Rules 23(a), 23(b)(1), and 23(b)(2) by Plaintiffs as representatives of the Class and by Current Counsel as counsel for the Class. In certifying this Action as a class action, the Court determined that the Class consists of all holders of common stock of TD Banknorth at any time from November 19, 2006 through and including April 20, 2007, whether beneficial or of record, including their legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest, transferees and assignees of all such foregoing holders, excluding Defendants, PCM, and Ariel and their associates, affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest, transferees and assignees (the Class ). Persons who are not affiliated or associated with PCM or Ariel and who, prior to April 20, 2007, acquired shares of TD Banknorth previously held by those entities are not considered successors in interest, transferees, and assignees of PCM or Ariel as a result of the acquisition of those shares, and are included in the Class. This Notice describes the rights you may have under the Settlement and what steps you may, but are not required to, take in relation to the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, the parties will ask the Court at the Settlement Hearing to enter an Order and Final Judgment dismissing the Action with prejudice on the merits against all Defendants. 1 All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this document shall have the meaning provided in the Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release. Questions? Call or visit TDBanknorthShareholdersLitigation.com Page 1 of 6

2 THE FOLLOWING RECITATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FINDINGS OF THE COURT. IT IS BASED ON STATEMENTS OF THE PARTIES AND SHOULD NOT BE UNDERSTOOD AS AN EXPRESSION OF ANY OPINION OF THE COURT AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY OF THE CLAIMS OR DEFENSES RAISED BY ANY OF THE PARTIES. II. BACKGROUND OF THE ACTION The Stipulation, subject to the approval of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, was entered into to reflect and embody the Settlement agreed to by and between (i) Plaintiffs on their own behalf and on behalf of the Class, and (ii) Defendants. On November 20, 2006, TD Banknorth announced the Going-Private Transaction. On November 20 and 21, 2006, six purported class actions were filed in the Court on behalf of a putative class of stockholders of TD Banknorth challenging the Going-Private Transaction. These actions asserted that TD Banknorth s directors and TD breached their fiduciary duties to TD Banknorth s minority shareholders by negotiating the Going-Private Transaction through an unfair process and at an unfair price. On November 29, 2006, the Court entered an Order consolidating the various purported class actions into the Action and appointing Co-Lead Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel (the Initial Counsel ). On February 15, 2007, Initial Counsel and Defendants reached an agreement-in-principle to settle the Action. Before those parties submitted their Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement, and Release (the Initial Proposed Settlement ) to the Court, Farmer and the Retirement System moved to intervene and to enjoin the closing of the Going-Private Transaction. These motions were denied, and on April 18, 2007, a shareholder vote was held, through which holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of TD Banknorth approved the Going-Private Transaction. Two days later, the Going-Private Transaction closed. That same day, April 20, 2007, Farmer and the Retirement System filed their objection to the Initial Proposed Settlement on the grounds that Initial Counsel did not adequately and vigorously represent the interests of the absent class members and that the terms of the proposed settlement were not fair. On July 19, 2007, the Court disapproved the Initial Proposed Settlement. See In re TD Banknorth S holders Litig., 938 A.2d 654 (Del. Ch. 2007). On August 4, 2007, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order permitting Farmer and the Retirement System s intervention in the Action as sole lead plaintiffs and appointing their counsel as sole lead counsel and sole Delaware liaison counsel ( Current Counsel ). On August 15, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a Verified Complaint against all Defendants, in which they asserted, inter alia, that (i) TD breached Section 2.2(b) of the Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated August 25, 2004 between TD Banknorth and TD (the Stockholders Agreement ) by proposing or initiating the Going-Private Transaction prior to March 1, 2007; (ii) the Toronto-Dominion Defendants and the Independent Directors breached their duty of loyalty to TD Banknorth s minority shareholders by executing the Going- Private Transaction in violation of the Stockholders Agreement and at an unfair price; and (iii) TD Banknorth and its directors violated their duty of candor by failing to disclose certain purportedly material information in the Definitive Proxy. On September 4, 2007, the Toronto-Dominion Defendants and TD Banknorth answered the Verified Complaint, and on September 7, 2007, the Independent Directors did the same. In their answers, all Defendants denied the material allegations of the Verified Complaint. Following the filing of these pleadings, Defendants sought and reviewed discovery from Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs sought and reviewed discovery from Defendants and from nonparties, including Defendants financial advisors and the two institutional shareholders, PCM and Ariel. On July 24, 2008, the Court certified the Class. Following the Court s certification of the Class, Plaintiffs sought further discovery from Defendants as well as from additional third parties, including the law firms that advised Defendants with respect to both TD s 2005 acquisition of 51 percent of TD Banknorth (the 51 Percent Transaction ) and the Going-Private Transaction. On February 17, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Preclude, or in the Alternative, to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony Withheld Based on Privilege or Work-Product Doctrine. Also on February 17, 2009, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, TD s counsel in the 51 Percent Transaction and Going-Private Transaction, moved for a protective order in the Supreme Court of the State of New York with respect to Plaintiffs subpoena to it for documents and a deposition concerning this Action. On or about February 19, 2009, the Court granted Plaintiffs motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint, which, inter alia, features additional detail with respect to Plaintiffs allegations that the price for the Going-Private Transaction was unfair and in regard to Plaintiffs disclosure-related claims. At various times and spanning several months, representatives of the parties to the Action held extensive arm s-length discussions in an effort to resolve the claims asserted in the Action. On February 23, 2009, the parties reached an agreement-in-principle concerning the Action, which they set forth in a Memorandum of Understanding dated March 12, 2009 (the MOU ). Pursuant to the MOU, the parties agreed, among other things, that (i) in consideration for the full settlement, satisfaction, compromise, and release of the Settled Claims (as defined herein), TD Banknorth and/or TD would pay US$50,000,000 into a settlement fund within 30 days of the execution of the MOU; (ii) such funds would be held in an interest-bearing account to be maintained at TD Banknorth by Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, Plaintiffs lead counsel, as escrow agent and on terms to be decided; and (iii) with the exception of amounts disbursed subject to the Court s approval for providing notice to the Class, for administration of the Settlement, and/or to pay taxes on the Settlement Fund (defined below) or any related tax preparation expenses, the Settlement Fund would not be distributed until the Settlement is reduced to a final, nonappealable judgment. Throughout the duration of this Action and in connection with their negotiation and evaluation of the Settlement, Current Counsel conducted a thorough investigation into the substance of the claims asserted in the Action. This investigation included analyzing documents produced by Defendants and third parties, including Defendants financial advisors, PCM, and Ariel, and obtained through publicly available sources; analyzing applicable case law and other authorities; consulting with Plaintiffs retained financial experts; and taking numerous depositions. Questions? Call or visit TDBanknorthShareholdersLitigation.com Page 2 of 6

3 III. THE SETTLEMENT AND PARTICIPATION IN THE SETTLEMENT In consideration for the full settlement, satisfaction, compromise, and release of the Settled Claims (as defined below), TD Banknorth and/or TD agreed to pay US$50,000,000 into a settlement fund (which together with all interest earned thereon constitutes the Settlement Fund ) on or before April 11, The Settlement Fund shall be utilized as follows a. To pay all costs and expenses of providing notice to members of the Class and administering and distributing the Settlement Fund to the Class. b. To pay taxes on the Settlement Fund and any related tax preparation expenses. c. Subject to the approval and further order of the Court, to pay to Current Counsel the amount awarded by the Court as attorneys fees and expenses. d. Subject to the approval and further order of the Court, and after payment of the costs and expenses of providing notice to the Class, the fees and expenses of distributing and administering the Settlement, any taxes to be paid on the Settlement Fund and related tax preparation expenses, and any attorneys fees and expenses awarded to Current Counsel by the Court, the remainder of the Settlement Fund (the Net Settlement Fund ) shall be distributed promptly to those members of the Class who were stockholders of record of TD Banknorth on April 20, 2007, on a pro rata basis, in accordance with their ownership of shares of TD Banknorth on such date, or as otherwise ordered by the Court. IF YOU DID NOT SURRENDER YOUR SHARES AND RECEIVE PAYMENT OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE MERGER ON APRIL 20, 2007, YOU MUST USE THE ATTACHED IDENTIFICATION FORM TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF TO THE FUND ADMINISTRATOR. If you surrendered your shares and received the initial merger consideration, your ownership information has been provided to the Fund Administrator and you will not need to complete this form. If you are not sure if you surrendered your shares, you may call the Fund Administrator at to confirm your status. e. If there is any balance remaining in the Settlement Fund after six months from the date of its distribution, Plaintiffs shall, if feasible, after full payment of all taxes, fees, and expenses described above, reallocate such balance among members of the Class who were stockholders of record of TD Banknorth on April 20, 2007, and who have been identified and located. If such reallocation is not feasible, or not permitted by the Court, any remainder in the Settlement Fund, after full payment of all taxes, fees, and expenses, shall be contributed to the Combined Campaign for Justice, a partnership between and among the Delaware State Bar Association, the Community Legal Aid Society, Inc., Delaware Volunteer Legal Services, and the Legal Services Corporation of Delaware. No portion of the Settlement Fund shall be returned to Defendants except in the event that the Settlement does not achieve Final Approval, the Settlement Fund (including any accumulated interest) shall be returned to TD Banknorth and/or TD. With the exception of funds withdrawn and for the purpose of (i) providing notice to the Class and administering and distributing the Settlement, with such funds not to exceed $200,000, and (ii) paying taxes on the Settlement Fund or any related tax preparation expenses, no funds from the Settlement Fund shall be disbursed until after the date on which the Court s Order and Final Judgment approving the Settlement is no longer subject to further appeal or review, whether by lapse of time to file an appeal, exhaustion of any possible appeal, or motion for reargument or rehearing ( Final Approval ). Members of the Class who were not stockholders of TD Banknorth on April 20, 2007, will not receive any monetary distribution. If you are a member of the Class, you will be bound by any judgment entered in the Action whether or not you actually receive this Notice. You may not opt out of the Class. IV. RELEASES The Stipulation provides that, subject to the Court s approval of the Settlement, and in consideration for the benefits provided by the Settlement, the Action shall be completely discharged and dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants and without fees or costs, except as expressly provided in the Stipulation. Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of the Class, have agreed to fully, finally, and forever release, settle, and dismiss with prejudice on the merits any and all claims, demands, losses, rights, causes of action, liabilities, obligations, judgments, suits, matters and issues of any kind or nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, including the Unknown Claims (as defined in the Stipulation), contingent or absolute, suspected or unsuspected, disclosed or undisclosed, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any court, tribunal, forum or proceeding (including, but not limited to, any claims arising under federal, state or foreign law, common law, statute, rule, or regulation relating to alleged fraud, breach of any duty, negligence, violations of the federal securities laws, or otherwise, and including all claims within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts), whether individual, class, direct, derivative, representative, legal, equitable or any other type or in any other capacity, against all Defendants, and/or any of their families, parent entities, associates, affiliates or subsidiaries and each and all of their past, present, or future officers, directors, stockholders, employees, attorneys, financial or investment advisors, consultants, accountants, investment bankers, commercial bankers, insurers, engineers, advisors or agents, heirs, executors, trustees, general or limited partners or partnerships, personal representatives, estates, administrators, and each of their respective predecessors, successors, and assigns (collectively, the Released Persons ), which Plaintiffs or any member of the Class ever had, now has, or hereafter can, shall, or may have by reason of, arising out of, relating to or in connection with the allegations, conduct, facts, events, transactions, acts, occurrences, statements, representations, alleged misrepresentations, omissions, or any other matter, thing or cause whatsoever, or any series thereof, embraced, involved, or set forth or otherwise related, directly or indirectly, to the Action, the Stockholders Agreement, or the Going-Private Transaction, including without limitation, any disclosures made or not made in connection with any of the foregoing, except claims to enforce the Settlement (collectively, the Settled Claims ), and to have the Settled Claims discharged and enjoined. Questions? Call or visit TDBanknorthShareholdersLitigation.com Page 3 of 6

4 The Settled Claims include claims that Plaintiffs, for themselves and on behalf of the Class, do not know or suspect to exist at the time of the release, which if known, might have affected the decision to enter into the release. Plaintiffs, for themselves and on behalf of the Class, shall be deemed to relinquish, to the full extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights, and benefits of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code ( Section 1542 ), which provides A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. In addition, Plaintiffs and each member of the Class shall be deemed to waive any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of the United States, any law of any state or territory of the United States, or any principle of common law that is similar, comparable, or equivalent to Section 1542 or that otherwise governs or limits a person s release of unknown claims that exist through and including the effective date of the Stipulation. Plaintiffs, for themselves and on behalf of the Class, acknowledge that members of the Class may discover facts in addition to or different from those that they now know or believe to be true with respect to the subject matter of this release, but that it is their intention, as Plaintiffs and on behalf of the Class, to fully, finally, and forever release, settle, and dismiss any and all claims released hereby, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, which now exist, or heretofore existed, through and including the effective date of the execution of the Stipulation, and without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such additional or different facts. The Stipulation further provides that Defendants have agreed to completely release and enjoin any and all claims that any of the Defendants or the Released Persons may have or could have asserted against Plaintiffs, Current Counsel, and/or the Class arising out of or related to the initiation, litigation, and resolution of the Action, except any claims to enforce the Settlement. V. REASONS FOR THE SETTLEMENT In evaluating the Settlement and entering into the Stipulation, Plaintiffs and Current Counsel have considered their investigation, and have taken into account, among other things, (i) the substantial benefits to the Class from the Settlement; (ii) the facts developed during the discovery process; (iii) the probability of success on the merits and the allegations contained in the Action; (iv) the strength of the defenses available to Defendants; (v) the attendant risks of continued litigation; (vi) the desirability of permitting the Settlement to be consummated as provided by the terms of the Stipulation; and (vii) the conclusion of Current Counsel and Plaintiffs that the terms and conditions of the Settlement are fair, reasonable, and adequate and that it is in the best interests of Plaintiffs and the Class to settle the Action as set forth in the Stipulation. Although Defendants have not answered the Amended Complaint in light of the proposed Settlement, Defendants would deny all of its material allegations if they were to answer the Amended Complaint. All Defendants continue their vigorous denial of any improper conduct, breach of the Stockholders Agreement, breach of any duty in connection with the Going-Private Transaction, and/or any other wrongdoing or liability relating to or arising out of the claims, events, and transactions set forth in the Action. Defendants have concluded that it is desirable that the Action be settled and dismissed on the merits and with prejudice as to all Defendants and that the Settled Claims be settled and released on the terms reflected in the Stipulation in order to avoid the costs, disruption, and distraction of further litigation. VI. APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES In connection with the Settlement Hearing, Current Counsel will apply to the Court for an award of attorneys fees of 27.5% of the Settlement Fund, plus expenses not to exceed $1.1 million, which shall be paid from the Settlement Fund. Included in the request for reimbursement of expenses will be a request by the Retirement System for the reimbursement of costs, not to exceed $2,000, for time incurred in its participation in discovery. No award of attorneys fees or expenses may be distributed until after Final Approval. It is not a condition of this Settlement that Current Counsel s application for fees and expenses be granted in any respect. The Court may consider and rule upon the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement independently of a separate award of attorneys fees and expenses. VII. CLASS ACTION DETERMINATION On July 24, 2008, the Court determined that the Action shall be maintained as a class action by Plaintiffs as representatives of the Class under Court of Chancery Rules 23(a), 23(b)(1), and 23(b)(2). The Class as certified by the Court consists of all holders of common stock of TD Banknorth at any time from November 19, 2006 through and including April 20, 2007, whether beneficial or of record, including their legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest, transferees and assignees of all such foregoing holders, excluding Defendants, PCM, and Ariel and their associates, affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest, transferees and assignees. Persons who are not affiliated or associated with PCM or Ariel and who, prior to April 20, 2007, acquired shares of TD Banknorth previously held by those entities are not considered successors in interest, transferees, and assignees of PCM or Ariel as a result of the acquisition of those shares, and are included in the Class. In certifying the Class, the Court also determined that Current Counsel shall serve as counsel for the Class. Current Counsel was appointed by agreement of the parties and as approved by the Court on August 1, The firms serving as Current Counsel include Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, which serves as sole lead counsel for Plaintiffs, and Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., which acts as sole Delaware liaison counsel for Plaintiffs. Inquiries or comments about the composition of the Class or the Settlement may be directed to Current Counsel as follows Evan J. Kaufman, Esq. COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr., Esq. PRICKETT, JONES & ELLIOTT, P.A King Street PO Box 1328 Questions? Call or visit TDBanknorthShareholdersLitigation.com Page 4 of 6

5 VIII. SETTLEMENT HEARING The Court has scheduled a Settlement Hearing, which will be held in the New Castle County Courthouse, 500 North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware, on June 25, 2009, at 200 p.m. to (i) determine whether the Court s prior certification of the Class should be made final; (ii) determine whether the Court should approve the Settlement as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class; (iii) determine whether the Court should enter an Order and Final Judgment pursuant to the Stipulation; (iv) consider the application of Current Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and expenses; (v) hear and determine any objections to the Settlement, final certification of the Class, or the application of Current Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and expenses; and (vi) hear such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate. The Court has reserved the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing or any adjournment thereof, including the consideration of the application for attorneys fees and expenses, without further notice of any kind other than oral announcement at the Settlement Hearing or at any adjournment thereof. The Court also has reserved the right to approve the Settlement at or after the Settlement Hearing with such modification(s) as may be consented to by the parties as provided for in the Stipulation and without further notice to the Class. IX. YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAR AND OBJECT AT THE SETTLEMENT HEARING Any member of the Class who (a) objects to (i) the Settlement, (ii) the final certification of the Class, (iii) the adequacy of representation by Plaintiffs and Current Counsel, (iv) the Order and Final Judgment to be entered in the Action, and/or (v) Current Counsel s application for attorneys fees and expenses, or (b) otherwise wishes to be heard, may appear in person or through counsel at the Settlement Hearing. If you wish to do so, however, you must, not later than 14 calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing (unless the Court in its discretion shall otherwise direct for good cause shown), file with the Register in Chancery, New Castle County Courthouse, 500 North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware, (i) a written notice of intention to appear; (ii) proof of membership in the Class; (iii) a statement of your objections to any matters before the Court; and (iv) the grounds thereof or the reasons for your desiring to appear and be heard, as well as any documents or writings you desire the Court to consider. Additionally, on or before the date you file such papers, you must serve them by hand or overnight courier upon each of the following attorneys of record to be received no later than Monday June 15, 2009 Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr., Esq. PRICKETT, JONES & ELLIOTT, P.A King Street PO Box 1328 Plaintiffs Delaware Liaison Counsel M. Duncan Grant PEPPER HAMILTON LLP Hercules Plaza, Suite North Market Street PO Box 1709 Counsel for TD Banknorth Inc. Anne C. Foster RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A. One Rodney Square 920 North King Street PO Box 551 Counsel for Defendants The Toronto-Dominion Bank, William J. Ryan, William E. Bennett, W. Edmund Clark, Bharat B. Masrani, and Wilbur J. Prezzano Bradley W. Voss POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP Hercules Plaza, Sixth Floor 1313 North Market Street PO Box 951 Counsel for Defendants Robert G. Clarke, P. Kevin Condron, John O. Drew, Brian M. Flynn, Joanna T. Lau, Dana S. Levenson, Steven T. Martin, John M. Naughton, Irving E. Rogers III, David A. Rosow, Curtis M. Scribner, Peter G. Vigue, and Gerry S. Weidema Any member of the Class who does not object to the Settlement, the final certification of the Class, the adequacy of representation by Plaintiffs and Class Counsel, and/or Current Counsel s request for an award of attorneys fees or expenses need not do anything at this time. Unless the Court otherwise directs, no person will be entitled to object to the approval of the Settlement, the final certification of the Class, the adequacy of representation by Plaintiffs and Current Counsel, or Current Counsel s request for an award of attorneys fees or expenses, or otherwise be heard, except by serving and filing written objections as described above. Any person who fails to object in the manner described above shall be deemed to have waived the right to object (including the right to appeal) and will forever be barred from raising such objections as described above in this or any other action or proceeding. X. ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT OF THE COURT If the Court determines that the Settlement, as provided for in the Stipulation, is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class, the parties will ask the Court to enter an Order and Final Judgment, which will, among other things a. Determine that the Action was properly maintained as a class action and make final the Court s prior certification of the Class pursuant to Court of Chancery Rules 23(a), 23(b)(1), and 23(b)(2); b. Approve the Settlement and adjudge the terms thereof to be fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class, pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 23(e); Questions? Call or visit TDBanknorthShareholdersLitigation.com Page 5 of 6

6 XI. c. Authorize and direct the performance of the Settlement in accordance with its terms and conditions; d. Rule on Current Counsel s application for an award of attorneys fees and expenses; e. Reserve jurisdiction over any matters relating to the implementation and enforcement of the Settlement, as well as any disputes concerning the Stipulation and any issues regarding distribution and administration of the Settlement Fund; f. Determine that the requirements of the Court of Chancery rules and due process have been satisfied in connection with notice to the Class; g. Dismiss the Action with prejudice on the merits and release all Defendants and all Released Persons from the Settled Claims; and h. Release Plaintiffs, the Class, and Current Counsel from all claims by Defendants or the Released Persons arising out of or related to the initiation, litigation, and resolution of the Action, except any claims to enforce the Settlement. NOTICE TO PERSONS OR ENTITIES HOLDING OWNERSHIP ON BEHALF OF OTHERS Brokerage firms, banks, and/or other persons or entities who held shares of TD Banknorth common stock for the benefit of others are directed promptly to send this Notice to all of their respective beneficial owners. If additional copies of the Notice are needed for forwarding to such beneficial owners, any requests for such additional copies may be made to the Fund Administrator TD BANKNORTH SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION FUND ADMINISTRATOR ATTENTION FULFILLMENT DEPARTMENT C/O A.B. DATA, LTD WEST HOPKINS STREET PO BOX MILWAUKEE, WI within the United States and Canada outside the United States and Canada fax abdataclassaction.com XII. SCOPE OF THE NOTICE This Notice is not all-inclusive. The references in this Notice to the pleadings in the Action, the Stipulation, and other papers and proceedings are only summaries and do not purport to be comprehensive. For the full details of the Action, the claims that have been asserted by the parties, and the terms and conditions of the Settlement, including a complete copy of the Stipulation, members of the Class are referred to the Court s files in the Action. You or your attorney may examine the Court s files during regular business hours of each business day at the office of the Register in Chancery, New Castle County Courthouse, 500 North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware. Questions or comments may be directed to the attorneys listed in Section VII above. DO NOT WRITE OR TELEPHONE THE COURT. DATED APRIL 23, 2009 BY ORDER OF THE COURT /s/ QUESTIONS? CALL OR VISIT TDBANKNORTHSHAREHOLDERSLITIGATION.COM PAGE 6 of 6

7 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TD BANKNORTH SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No VCL IDENTIFICATION FORM FOR PARTIES THAT DID NOT SURRENDER SHARES PURSUANT TO THE APRIL 20, 2007 MERGER If you surrendered your TD Banknorth shares and received the merger consideration payment for these shares, you will be issued a payment from the Net Settlement Fund without any further action being taken; please do not file an Identification Form (ID Form). Claim information for all parties that surrendered their shares and received the merger consideration has been provided to the Fund Administrator already. If you are not sure if you surrendered your shares, you may call the Fund Administrator at to determine if all necessary information has been provided from the merger exchange. Please complete this ID Form to identify yourself to the Fund Administrator ONLY if you DID NOT SURRENDER YOUR SHARES AND RECEIVE PAYMENT OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION following the completion of the merger on April 20, The undersigned submits this ID Form in order to identify himself/herself/itself to the Fund Administrator as a shareholder of record of TD Banknorth common stock on April 20, 2007, who did not surrender his/her/its shares of TD Banknorth common stock pursuant to the April 20, 2007 merger. This ID Form must contain the name, address, and Social Security number of the beneficial owner. In addition, to the extent known, you should provide the quantity of shares and the stock certificate numbers (if shares were held in certificate form; if shares were held through a brokerage account certificate numbers would not be needed). You must sign the ID Form in the space provided in order to make a valid claim. Please also provide your brokerage statement for April 2007 or a letter from your bank, broker, or other nominee indicating the quantity of shares held as of April 20, 2007, if you did not hold shares in certificate form. If you held shares in certificate form, you may be contacted for further verifying information. If you did not surrender shares, in order to be eligible for any potential payment, you must complete this ID Form as instructed and mail the ID Form to TD Banknorth Shareholders Litigation, Fund Administrator, c/o A.B. Data, Ltd., PO Box , Milwaukee, WI The completed and signed form must be postmarked on or before June 15, If you do not fully complete, sign, and send the ID Form postmarked on or before June 15, 2009, you will not receive any payment you might otherwise be entitled to receive, but you will still be bound by the terms of the Stipulation. LAST NAME (BENEFICIAL OWNER) IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION FIRST NAME (BENEFICIAL OWNER) STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (AS APPLICABLE) QUANTITY OF SHARES STOCK CERTIFICATE NUMBER(S) APPLICABLE ONLY FOR SHARES HELD IN CERTIFICATE FORM Signature of Claimant or Claimant s Representative Date (mm/dd/yyyy)

THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No VCL

THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No VCL THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE REHABCARE GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 6197 - VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BOISE INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8933-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JOHN NICHOLAS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2013 CH 11752 Consolidated

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Case No. 30-2009-00236910 CLASS ACTION Assigned

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION THE PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FUNDS, On Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN RE SWISHER HYGIENE, INC. SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION X X MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER

More information

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <>

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>> IN RE SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION STOCKHOLDER AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION C/O RUST CONSULTING INC - 5568 PO BOX 2563 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9563 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *CLMNTIDNO* - UAA -

More information

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER.

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO ALL CASES Index No. 775000/2012 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARGARET B. ADAM, On Behalf of Herself ) No. C-93-20399-RMW(EAI) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff,

More information

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:12-cv-00829-VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 FILED 2015 Jul-15 PM 04:21 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Enzymotec Securities Litigation Toll-Free Number: 844-418-6627 Claims Administrator Website: www.enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com PO Box 4079 Email: info@enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com Portland OR

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOSEPH BULWA, MICHAEL MOHAMADIFAR, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs, PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC., ROBERT

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CHINA MOBILE GAMES & ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LTD SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:14-CV-04471 (KMW) This Document Relates To: All Actions Deadline

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.: 1:07-cv-1757-RC For Official

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE AND

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * AMENDED STIPULATION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS LEWIS F. GEER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 01-2583-JAR ) WILLIAM D. COX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) DAVID GROGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE COMVERGE, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION ) CONSOLIDATED ) C.A. No. 7368-VCMR STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE This Stipulation

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS Exhibit A IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. CAPEX LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 9318-VCL SCHEDULING ORDER WHEREAS,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JAMES SULLIVAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION v. Plaintiff, TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. EFiled: Oct 20 2015 11:35AM EDT Transaction ID 58039964 Case No. 10553-VCN IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE NPS PHARMACEUTICALS STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civ. No. 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL CLASS ACTION TO: NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE THIRD AVENUE TRUST SHAREHOLDER AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 12184-VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L In re Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shareholder Litigation SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. ESX-L-4370-07 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER CLASS ACTION OFFICIAL

More information

Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative

Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative Page 1 of 20 Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative Action NEWS PROVIDED BY Third Avenue Management 09:00 ET WILMINGTON, Del., April 21, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is being released pursuant

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY SOMERSET COUNTY: CHANCERY DIVISION. x : : : : : : : : : : : x. Docket No. C

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY SOMERSET COUNTY: CHANCERY DIVISION. x : : : : : : : : : : : x. Docket No. C SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY SOMERSET COUNTY CHANCERY DIVISION In re THE CHUBB CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Docket No. C-012040-15 TO NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION IN RE CONCORD EFS, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) No. 02-2697 Ma Judge Mays NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc EXHIBIT A-1 Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc TO: All persons and entities who owned shares either of Thema International Fund plc or

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. Case No. 14 Civ. 8925 (KMW) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II)

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT RICHARD TYNER, III, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, EMBARQ CORPORATION, THOMAS A. GERKE, WILLIAM

More information

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 14-5628 (PGS)(LHG) NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT;

More information

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9 Case Case 1:10-cv-03864-AKH Document Document 476-1 479 Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X MARY K. JONES, Individually and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM AND SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM AND SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9 In re American Business Financial Services Inc. Noteholders Litigation I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA X X Master File No. 05-232 PROOF OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RUDMAN, ET AL., v. CHC GROUP, LTD., ET AL., Civil Action No. 15-cv-3773 (LAK) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING,

More information

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS Global A&T Electronics Ltd., et al. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) Chapter 11 In re: ) GLOBAL A&T ELECTRONICS LTD., et al., 1 ) ) ) Debtors. ) ) ) IMPORTANT: No chapter

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU. Index No CLASS ACTION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU. Index No CLASS ACTION SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU PAULINE PHILLIPS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP., et al., Index No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL HALTMAN, et al., Case No. 92-3388 CBM Plaintiffs, Consolidated Class Action vs. AURA SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants. BARRY ABRAMS,

More information

x : : : : : : : : : : : : x

x : : : : : : : : : : : : x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MASSACHUSETTS BRICKLAYERS AND MASONS TRUST FUNDS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE ALT-A SECURITIES,

More information

Case 1:14-cv AKH Document Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115. Exhibit 1

Case 1:14-cv AKH Document Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115. Exhibit 1 Case 1:14-cv-02392-AKH Document 152-1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115 Exhibit 1 Case 1:14-cv-02392-AKH Document 152-1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 2 of 115 EXECUTION VERSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

Case 1:16-cv PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45. x : : : : : : : x

Case 1:16-cv PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45. x : : : : : : : x Case 1:16-cv-02758-PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re THIRD AVENUE MANAGEMENT LLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates

More information

Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick, NY

Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick, NY Must be Postmarked No Later Than June 28, 2006 UNR Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator *P-UNRF-APOC/1* PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 7328 VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT

More information

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF MASTERCARD INCORPORATED

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF MASTERCARD INCORPORATED AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF MASTERCARD INCORPORATED MasterCard Incorporated (the Corporation ), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby

More information

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED ARTICLE I NAME

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED ARTICLE I NAME CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED The undersigned does hereby make and acknowledge this Certificate of Incorporation for the purpose of forming a business corporation pursuant

More information

In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV TPG-HBP

In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV TPG-HBP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV-09418-TPG-HBP AMENDED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF ALTAIR

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE ON-POINT TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Master File No. 00cv00812BTM(POR) CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS

More information

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID P. ANASTASI, et al., Lead Case No. 08-2-31902-4 SEA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SUMMARY OF ATTACHED NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you obtained a Second Mortgage Loan on your Missouri home from Preferred

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION Coordination Proceeding JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO. 4256 VERISIGN CASES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE In re General Electric Co. Sec. Litig. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE To recover from the Net Settlement Fund as

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL ) EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually ) and

More information

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26 Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document1 Filed04//11 Page1 of 1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (3113) DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM (24863 1) 3 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

More information

Case 1:06-cv PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:06-cv PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case 1:06-cv-12967-PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PANTHER PARTNERS INC., On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MINNEAPOLIS FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated shareholders of Terremark Worldwide, Inc., Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MASSEY ENERGY CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-00689-ICB NOTICE

More information

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed // Page of 0 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release and its attached exhibits ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), is entered into by

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement

More information

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 2 of 31 PAGEID #: 1034 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Debtors. (Jointly Administered)

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Debtors. (Jointly Administered) IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 MEMORIAL PRODUCTION Case No. 17-30262 PARTNERS LP, et al., Debtors. (Jointly Administered) BENEFICIAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. IN RE: ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. ) Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. IN RE: ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. ) Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. EFiled: Dec 19 2014 05:41PM EST Transaction ID 56502722 Case No. 8885-VCL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. ) Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A.

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION X In re TECO ENERGY, INC. : SECURITIES LITIGATION : Case No. 8:04-CA-1948-T-27EAJ : : This Document Relates To: : : ALL ACTIONS. :

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT WITH COMPANY AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT WITH COMPANY AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS Case 1:08-cv-02940-AT Document 111-3 Filed 12/21/11 Page 2 of 128 In re CARTER S, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-2940-AT

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JASON ALDRIDGE, derivatively on behalf of TERRAFORM GLOBAL, INC., v. Plaintiff, PETER BLACKMORE, CHRISTOPHER COMPTON, HANIF DAHYA, and JACK JENKINS- STARK,

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE CASE 0:14-md-02522-PAM Document 653-1 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 14-2522

More information

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-md-02027-BSJ Document 252-1 Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-md-02027-BSJ Document 252-1 Filed 02/16/11 Page 2 of 150 Case 1:09-md-02027-BSJ Document 252-1 Filed 02/16/11 Page

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE. THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY.

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE. THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE. THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW

More information

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281 Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. C EMC. (Derivative Action)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. C EMC. (Derivative Action) CURTIS AD CHARLOTTE WESTLE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. OCLARO, IC., et al., Defendants. In re OCLARO, IC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATIO This Document Relates To:

More information

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA CHARLES GLASS, and ) RONNIE JENNINGS, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) CV 2014-900163 BLACK WARRIOR ELECTRIC ) MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, ) Defendant. ) NOTICE OF CLASS

More information

This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Attention Purchasers of RUST-OLEUM Painter s Touch Ultra Cover 2X spray paint, RUST-OLEUM Painter's Touch 2X Ultra Cover spray paint, RUST-OLEUM PaintPlus Ultra Cover 2X spray paint, RUST-OLEUM American

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re COVAD SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-00-3891-PJH CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND

More information

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD.

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD. HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD ( Plaintiff ) and HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. GERALD M. SOLOWAY ROBERT MORTON ROBERT J.

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs.

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs. Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDRA BALABAN, On Behalf of Civil Action No. 02-4852 Herself And All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, Hon. Joel A. Pisano HENRY B. SCHACHT,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705 Case :0-cv-00-R-CW Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 JOSEPH J. TABACCO, JR. # Email: jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com NICOLE LAVALLEE # Email: nlavallee@bermandevalerio.com BERMAN DeVALERIO One California

More information

Case 1:16-cv LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34. x : : : : : : : : : : : x

Case 1:16-cv LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34. x : : : : : : : : : : : x Case 116-cv-03925-LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DONALD P. BOLAND and MARY A. BOLAND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

Voting and Support Agreement and Release of Claims

Voting and Support Agreement and Release of Claims Voting and Support Agreement and Release of Claims VOTING AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS (this Agreement ), dated as of, 2016, by and among the Stockholder listed on the signature page hereto

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 This Notice is being sent to let you know of the proposed

More information

Plaintiffs, NOTICE TO CURRENT ARCA STOCKHOLDERS

Plaintiffs, NOTICE TO CURRENT ARCA STOCKHOLDERS STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: Other Civil DAVID GRAY and MICHAEL BOLLER, Derivatively and on Behalf of APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA,

More information

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF TRANSUNION * * * * * ARTICLE I NAME. The name of the Corporation is TransUnion.

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF TRANSUNION * * * * * ARTICLE I NAME. The name of the Corporation is TransUnion. SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF TRANSUNION * * * * * The present name of the corporation is TransUnion (the Corporation ). The Corporation was incorporated under the name Spartan

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE ROYAL DUTCH/SHELL TRANSPORT ERISA LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-1398 (JWB) (Consolidated Cases) Judge John W. Bissell NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BRANDON HARTSELL, ALEXANDER and JACQUELINE BERLIN, ABE KASSIN, MARK GEIS, BRUCE SOUSA and KURT PAIGE, On Behalf of Themselves and

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE HIBERNIA FOODS, PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------------- THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL

More information

Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:15-cv-07350-PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc Securities Litigation

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x BARBARA E. BERNARD, COURMANT AND W APNER ASSOCIATES AND ROBERT SUTHERLAND, on behal f of themselves and all others similarly situated, -against- Plaintiffs, UBS W ARBURG LLC AND ANTON W AHLMAN, Defendants.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALOMON ANALYST LEVEL 3 LITIGATION 02 Civ. 6919 (GEL) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IF YOU PURCHASED

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

Case 1:16-cv JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:16-cv JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:16-cv-03282-JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 77 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:16-cv-03282-JFM Document 18-4 Filed 06/30/17 Page 2 of 77 EXECUTION COPY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

More information

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 2 of 9 BETWEEN EXHIBIT "A" CANADIAN PRE-APPROVAL ORDER ONTARIO SUPERIOR

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION THE ERICA P. JOHN FUND, INC., et al., On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:02-CV-1152-M

More information

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated as of December 18, 2015 (the

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated as of December 18, 2015 (the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 1:12-cv-03852-GBD STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation and

More information

Case l:14"cv~09418~at~hbp Document 20-4 Filed 07/27/16 Page 2 of 12

Case l:14cv~09418~at~hbp Document 20-4 Filed 07/27/16 Page 2 of 12 Case l:14"cv~09418~at~hbp Document 20-4 Filed 07/27/16 Page 2 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.:

More information