NOTICE OF FILING 1. I^4g'1tilitiff^ lav upoii the bar this NOTICE cafthe attached filii7; in an altertaate coiirt, C^RTtFiCA'I,E OF SERVICE

Transcription

1 sup. 1w-co.. r^^^. OF. OHI^..^ :^": G., ^ r ic}tusju5tice The Great Republic of America, Utaioii of Sovereign States, united States of Anierica,, Plaintiffs, Case NowQ V. "UNITED STATES" et al, STATE OF OHIO, et al, FRANKLf;.I COUNTY MUNICIPAL "COURT", FRA.NKi,TN COUNTY "CC7tJRT" OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN CO[-`NTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, et al, CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al, MONICA GREER JUSTICE, et al, Defeaiclaizts. NOTICE OF FILING 1 I^4g'1tilitiff^ lav upoii the bar this NOTICE cafthe attached filii7; in an altertaate coiirt,,rr..v f y^ 7 r-1tatl^^lstlce, h.rr I,awfiil Executor ti.^r L;OTUS, et al, 0' Private _Attorne,v general & Exectrtor de Sori Tort for the Great Reptiblic of Aiiierica, the. ' Uiricn of Sovereign States of Amerzca. a^ici the i^tiitecl States c^f,,^r^eri.ca C^RTtFiCA'I,E OF SERVICE The Defendants stated herein the attached document shall receive a copy of ffiis documeiyt and the attached clocument delivered bv "Uiited States" Postal Service delivery, a third party courier or perfiviial service: r-1atusjustic^ ARR

2 Oath of Certified Copy On this "A\- day of of 20 Vt^ f, the undersigned Notary Public, has compared the original and the copies and certify under penalty of perjury under the Laws of the Republic for the united States of America that said attached copies. are exact duplicates to the original. Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires ^ ^. ^ /^ Y^,5 F.^,.;^ ^^a/yf^ R 3p4\'^`

3 US ^AWPUPTCY COURT r, i ^,<^`ry^ "^ UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE S OUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COLU MB US, OHIO ^^^ 17 ^^^13- RE^..: ^^^IVED r latusjusticea Petitioner, VS. stephen-lomcinfi sh Franklin County Common Pleas "Court" Respondent. Case IV. a PETITION F R. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C and 28 U.S.C INTRODUCTION Petitioner r-ictus:justice, by and through her Next Friend, respectfully moves this Court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to vacate and set aside the order of January 9, 2015, by "Judge" stephen-i;mcintash, whereby the respondent would be required to show why continued incarceration of Petitioner r-lotus:justice is just. JURISDICTION Petitioner r-lotus:justice brings this action to this Bankruptcy Court pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, 9, Protection and Detention of Bankrupts Petitioner r- lotus:justice further brings this action pursuant to Article I, 9 and Article III of the Constitution for the united States of America circa 1812, as well as the F urth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution for the united States of America circa 1812, 28 U.S.C et seq. (including 28 U.S.C. 2254, and all other 1

4 -y plicab[e law The Suspension Clause protects "the writ as it existed in 1789," that is, as a writ which federal judges could issue in the exercise of their 'Common Law' authority. (See Boumedinene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008. The authority of federal courts to review the claims of prisoners in state custody is clearly established in 28 U.S.G granting federal courts that authority in 1867, as part of the post-civil War Reconstruction. In the case of Waley v. Johnson, 316 U.S. 101 (1942, the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted this authority broadly to allow the writ to be used to challenge convictions or sentences in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights where no other remedy was available. PETITION The Petitioner r-lotus:justice, a real flesh and blood wo(man acting in propria persona, has been misidentified as MONICA GREER JUSTICE. No charges have been brought against r-lotus:justice and presents the following in support of the writ. 1. Petitioner r-lotus:justice, is the party for whom this petition is intended and prosecuted. Petitioner is unlawfully restrained of her liberty under the name GREER JUSTICE (a fictitious entity, being imprisoned by Capt. Turner at the Franklin County Jail. 2. Petitioner r-lotus:justice, being a real flesh and blood Wo(man and peaceful inhabitant of the Land, standing in the Law of the Land, The Common Law, and standing under the Will of the People, the Constitution for the Republic for the united States of America, do demand a probable cause hearing in remedy saved pursuant to the Judicial Act of 1789, the Savings to Suitors Clause and the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, and other law cited above. 2

5 jc Z 11t% p ^ Ik'` ^ ^+i.rr'. 8 G2-Z-1c r^f ^ ^^^ 3. Petitioner r-lotds:justice was arrested and incarcerated on or about January 8^'`^^ ^< ^3 27, 2015, after bond was revoked by "Judge" stephen-l:rncintosh on January 9, The bond was revoked because the Petitioner refused to abdicate her Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights and her "standing" in The Common Law and submit to a presentence investigation to obtain "parol" evidence without the protections of a witness, of counsel, recorder of record or recording devise in apposition to the F.R.C.P 32(c(2 "the probation officer who interviews a defendant as part of a presentence investigation must, on request, give the defendant's attorney notice and a reasonable opportunity to attend the interview." The Petitioner's queries. to the purported court, FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS " COURT", in case number 14CR1581 have gone unanswered, either by neglect or inability to answer with specificity as to which jurisdiction in Law is being invoked. Petitioner's status has not been challenged. The purported court, FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS "COURT", has not established proper jurisdiction which is required before a case may move forward. The Petitioner is neither a`flight risk' nor a`danger to the public' and no plausible cause exists for her incarceration except to intimidate and coerce her to abandon her rights and standing as a'natural inhabitant and to frustrate her ability to fruitfully pursue her defense as a propria persona litigant. Petitioner and her Power of Attorney on her behalf, have repeatedly requested access to a law library and tools necessary to assist in her defense. The fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts requires prison authorities to assist inmates in the preparatioin and filing of meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law. (See Bounds v. Smith (430 U.S

6 x ^ :r P ;gl P IB f,% <3' ^a ^Fr^^La This is evident b y the denial b y the Ohio Supreme Court of an Appeal by Right u6"w due to non compliance with the Rules of Procedure. (See Exhibit The Petitioner r-lotus;justice, by and through incorporeal hereditaments, is the Grantor of the Trust and a Preferred/Priority Creditor pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act of Petitioner has been arrested and is being held as the `Bankrupt'. Petitioner has been placed in forced involuntary bankruptcy as a Preferred/Priority Creditor. The Petitioner is neither a bankrupt nor a 14;h Amendment "civilly dead" entity but rather a lawful Executor for the commercial instrument, the person/person, Monica Greer Justice/IVIONICA GREER JUSTICE. 5. Whereas the purported "courts" of law, the PERSON, FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL "COURT" and the FRANKLIN COUNTY "COURT" OF COMMON PLEAS (hereafter "private banks" have never established that they are Courts of Law operating under a Grant of Law pursuant to Article I or III of The Constitution for the united States of America of 1789 and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure and are thus barred by Estoppels and Fraud from moving forward in the causes at bar, 6. Whereas the purported "courts" of law as private banks, have never established upon the bar and the public record venue, subject matter and personal jurisdiction in the causes at the bar as required pursuant to The Common Law, the Constitution for the united States of America and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure and are barred by Estoppels and fraud from moving forward in the causes at bar, 4

7 rm1 ^`^ 4 a,v 7. Whereas the purported "courts" of law as private banks, have not required the purported representers of the purported Plaintiff, Esquires for/of the BAR union, to provide competent witness(es of fact to produce corroborating testimony or sealed instruments as affidavits given under/sealed under penalty of perjury by the Laws of the united States of America, the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure and are thus barred by Estoppels and Fraud from moving forward in the causes at bar, 8. Whereas the Men and Wo(men as agents for the purported "courts" of law as private banks, have affected and effected multiple violations of the Ohio Rules of Evidence and the Rules of Civil Procedure and Statutes of the person/person, The State of Ohio/THE STATE OF OHIO, in addition to the Common Law and multiple unafienable rights guaranteed by the Judiciary Act of 1789 and the Constitution for the united States of America and are barred by Estoppels and Fraud from moving forward in the causes at bar, 9. Whereas the Men and Wo(men as agents for the purported "courts" of law as private banks, are attempting to unlawfully affect and effect a forced bankruptcy pursuant to the bankruptcy Act of 1898 by using threat, duress, deceit, Fictio, Fraud and acts of Sedition and Treason and, 10o Whereby the real Wo(men, r-lotus:justice, with the lawful right by lineage and hereditaments to inherit the Perfect Usufruct and the cestui que trust derived thereof and created by the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, was unlawfully taken by highway men/pirates, pursuant to the Lieber Code, operating as agents for the purported "courts" of law as private banks, and 5

8 T ^. ^. nt ^ 11. Whereby the petitioner was unlawfully imprisoned, held in chains and coerced by threats and intimidation to initiate a claim of Equity in Bankruptcy pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 as the Preferred Creditor and lawful Executor for the cestui que trust's commercial instrument, the person/person, Monica Greer Justice/MONICA GREER JUSTICE, against said commercial instrument and Trust in order to affect and effect the petitioner's release from unlawful bondage, and 12. Whereby the Petitioner's signature upon the application for a bond did make the Petitioner, r-lotus:justice, by Fact and Law, the Petitioner in the causes at bar pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act of Wherefore, said application initiated a fraudulent claim against the said cestui que trust commercial instrument on behalf of the real Wo(man, under subrogation and abrogation of the subsequent bankruptcies that followed the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 as THE STATE OF OHIO. Wherefore, Men and Wo(men as agents for the purported "courts" of law as private banks and the Esquires for/of the BAR Union that control them by unlawful monopoly pursuant to the Sherman Anti-trust Act, did operate as/for an unknown 8rd party interloper(s to affect and effect deceit, Fictio, Fraud and acts of Sedition and Treason, attempting to affect and effect an unlawful conveyance of Executorship and control of the cestui que trust using collusive and corrupt systems of racketeering whereby they create and present fraudulently acquired parol/hearsay evidence in the fraudulently initiated cause at bar in the unlawful monopoly of private banks. Wherefore, by unlawfully and fraudulently securing Executorship, the Men and Wo(men as agents for said entities could then attach the cestui que trust and gain control over the Perfect Usufruct, thereby unlawfully affecting Escheat for the benefit of said 3fd party interloper(s upon the Land and All Free People 6

9 ^,... v'`' y ^ ^i......^,.. 4r ^ d,'^"areetaew+^^ly the Land who hold lawful title of inheritance by The Common _ La^v, se^he _ Law of Equity and the Constitution for the united States of America. Wherefore said "courts" of law are barred by Estoppeis and Fraud from moving forward in the causes at bar. DEMAND FOR RELIEF 13. Pursuant to the foregoing, whereas the Petitioner has been unlawfully incarcerated and whereas the Petitioner poses no threat to public safety and whereas the incarceration is for ulterior motives of intimidation and coercion, and whereas it can be proven that multiple violations of Law and statutes have been committed, this propria persona Petitioner demands this court vacate the above orders for revocation of bond and the accompanying capias and that it be determined to be in violation of The Constitution for the united States of America and the Constitution of the "United States" for reasons which arise from the facts of this case and order the release of Petitioner forthwith and other such relief as the court may deem just and proper. 14. In the alternative, Petitioner requests to be brought before this court to argue her claim in more detail. Petitioner reserves the right to amend this Petition at any time. For: r-lotus:justice Sui Juris cfo P.O. Box Columbus, Ohio the State Currently incarcerated at the Franklin County Corrections Center Jackson Pike Columbus, Ohio the State 7

10 : ^;RY ^. By: Next Friend micha i-anthony:gailuzz Contact address: clo P.O. Box CoIumbus, Ohio the State As Next Friend in this rnatter, iattest that the statements made herein are true and accurate to the best of my beliet and affirm under oath under penaity of perjury by the laws of the united States of America pursuant to Title 28 USC, section Witness my hand on this 17 I" day of the month of February ^ michael-anthony:galluzzo, Next Friend, ARR Prinfied Name Yr c/o P.O. Box Columbus, Ohio the State i ^,y J 4. n l r'?^ ^^ ^^s ^ MARINA ^'.^S9^^^A Notary Pubk Stafe, of Wo My Gomm4ssiors Exp res ^341^^18, +9 ^ i l I i 3 JV[y 8

11 OFFICE OF THE CLERK w #y^, ^ C-ItEF jusrice AALTREEId O'CONNOR 65 SOII'rPi FRON: SZ'FIEET, COLF7IV%Bt;.S, ^"' JH A +7(a3}86^ ^ SA.IVBRA H. GRO8ICo5-1c (Ls-T'ICFS PAUL E. PFEIFER T'ERRI:1NCE o`l30?+rtiell JUDiTH FSRIt+t LANZT,' igeiz SHARON L. KENNEDY ]UD2'F' rl L. FRENCH WILLI.iM M. O'PdE.ILI. TELEPHONE FACSIMILE 514.3$ vww. supremecourtohica. cgov February 6, 2015 Monica Greer Justice P. 0. Box Columbus, Ohio Dear Ms. Justice: The enclosed documents were not filed because they do not comply with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio. It is unclear from the face of the documents whether you are attempting to file an original action or an appeal. These are two separate case types that may not be initiated with one set of documents. See Rule 6.01 and Rule $ Please note that all documents must be presented on paper that is 8 %z x 11 inches in size, be secured firmly by a single staple in the upper-left hand corner of the document or be spiralbound, and be accompanied by the required number of copies. See Rule 3.09 and Rule Additionally, if you are attempting to file an original action: 0 The cover (front page of your complaint must state the na.me, date, and address of each named respondent. This is the address at which the clerk's office would serve a copy of the complaint and the surnrnons. See Rule 12.02(A. 0 The complaint must also be accompanied by 10 copies, plus one additional copy for each named respondent. See Rule Alterriatively, if you are attempting to file an appeal of right: 0 The notice of appeal must be accompanied by the Ohio court of appeals' decision that is the subject of the appeal. It must be fewer than 45-days old. See Rule = If you are submitting an appeal rather than an original action, only $100 is required. See Rule You may resubmit your documents once the required changes have been made. A copy of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio is enclosed for your reference. Your $200 money order is also enclosed. Sincerely, Clerk's Office Enclosures