12- Q469- NO. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORM PAUPERIS AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
|
|
- Karin White
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NAL SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO DAVID S. HOPPER, PETITIONER STATE OF OHIO, RESPONDENT V. 12- Q469- NO. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORM PAUPERIS AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Comes now the Petitioner, David S. Hopper, pro se, and moves this court F LD MAR * CLEAK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO pursuant to Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 44(A), and all other applicable law, for leave to proceed on his Writ of Habeas Corpus action In Forma Pauperis. As grounds for this Motion to proceed forthwith `In Forma Pauperis' and for Appointment of Counsel, Petitioner states as follows. 1. That Petitioner has filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition in the Ohio State Supreme Court. 2. That Petitioner is not able to hire private counsel to assist him in perfecting his Petition. Petitioner is an indigent according to the provisions of Rule 44(A) id. and requires farther assistance of an attorney, in order to supplement his pro se pleadings. 3. That Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, LaGrange, Kentucky and is not able, to hire private counsel to assist him in perfecting his Petition. The Petitioner also respectfully requests this court, pursuant to Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 44(A) to appoint counsel to represent him in his Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition proceeding. Petitioner is financially unable to employ counsel. (See 12
2 attached Affidavit of Indigence and six month prison account statement.) The Petitioner request counsel to be appointed to supplement his pro se Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition; FURTHERNIORE; Petitioner believes that in the event the State of Ohio will dispute his arguments, that it will be necessary to conduct an evidentiary hearing, including testimony from trial counsel. Petitioner is a lay person and not trained in the law. Under Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure, he would be entitled to appointment of counsel in such circumstances. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests the court to grant him leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis and pursue this action. Petitioner further requests the appointment of an attorney to supplement his pro se Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition pursuant to Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedures Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 44(A), to grant counsel leave to supplement any and all other issues and grounds for holding the sentence[s] and subsequent detainer[s] invalid, of which counsel learns and which Petitioner has failed to raise in his Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition. Such relief is warranted under the provisions of the Constitution of the State of Ohio section , , , , , and Petitioner asks for any other relief to which he may be entitled. t David S. Hop er, Pro Se Luther Luckett Correctional Complex 1612 Dawkins Road LaGrange, Kentuclcy
3 NOTICE The foregoing motion was mailed by first class postage prepaid to the Clerlc of the Ohio State Supreme Court on this 15"'day of March PETITIONER ' DAVID S. HOPPER, PRO SE 14
4 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO DAVID S. HOPPER, PETITIONER V. NO. ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORM PAUPERIS AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL STATE OF OHIO, RESPONDENT. * The Petitioner, having moved this court for an order to proceed In Forma Pauperis, and it appearing to the court that the Petitioner is a pauper within the meaning of, and the court being sufficiently advised: proceeding. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable, be appointed to represent Petitioner in this ENTERED THIS day of, Judge, The Ohio State Supreme Court 15
5 ATTACHMENT NOT SCANNED
6 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO DAVID S. HOPPER, PETITIONER STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF WARREN, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, COUNTY OF HAMILTON, RESPONDENTS NO. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS David S. Hopper, Petitioner, pro se, hereby files a Petition under Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure for a Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging his conviction and sentence. Petitioner is currently a Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Corrections inmate under a sentence of twenty years with related detainers from the state of Ohio for Indictment Numbers 08CR25107 (Warren County Common Pleas Court), 2006 CR (Montgomery County Common Pleas Court), 06 CR (Franklin County Common Pleas Court), and B (Hamilton County Common Pleas Court). Petitioner is currently being held at Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, 1612 Dawlcins Road, LaGrange, Kentuclcy on the said detainers in violation of the Constitution of the State of Ohio and the Constitution of the United States. His inmate number is Clark Taylor is the Warden of Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, which the address is 1612 Dawkins Road, LaGrange, Kentucky
7 I. JURISDICTION Petitioner does not currently have any petition, application, motion or appeal pending in any Court, either state or federal, as to the detainer[s], conviction[s], and sentence[s] at issue in this matter. Petitioner also has exhausted in the courts of Ohio the claim[s] that he advances in this petition. Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure grants the either the Ohio State Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Court of Common Pleas, Probate Court, or by a Judge of any such Court the authorization to grant writ. Ohio Rales of Criminal Procedure gives jurisdiction to the county of which the inmate, petitioner, is currently housed, the jurisdictional authority to issue the writ. S}nce, it is the detainers of several Ohio jurisdictions that are being attacked within, the jurisdiction falls to either the Ohio Supreme Court or the Ohio Court of Appeals. II. PRIOR ATTORNEYS At trial level of this case, Petitioner was represented by the Honorable Donald E. Oda II; who is located in the county of Warren, Ohio. Petitioner had no direct appeal. There was no post-conviction action[s] filed in this present case. III. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Petitioner seeks review of his convictions in the afore-mentioned indictments, on the grounds that they violated established provisions with-in the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). The facts of the present case are:
8 1. On 6 February 2006 the Petitioner was arrested by the Boone County Sherriff's Department (Boone County, Kentucky) on an arrest warrant issued in Campbell County, Kentucky for offenses committed in 2004 and These offenses were deemed to be related to crimes cominitted in multiple jurisdictions in Kentuclcy, Indiana, and Ohio (Warren, Franklin, Montgomery, and Hamilton counties). Whereas, those jurisdictions filed detainers on the Petitioner. 2. In regards to the out-of-state detainers lodged againsthim, the Petitioner waived extradition proceedings. 3. Approximately eighteen months after his arrest, while still in custody in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Warren County Common Pleas Court executed the Interstate Agreement on Detainers to have officials in Kentucky (the sending state) produce the Petitioner for arraignment in Warren County, Ohio (the receiving state). 4. On 30 July 2007 the Warren County Common Pleas Court brought the Petitioner, David S. Hopper, before the court via mechanical means for the purpose of arraignment on indictment number 08CR (File entry on 1 August 2007). 5. The Petitioner was returned to the custody of the Commonwealth of Kentucky (the sending state) at the conclusion of the proceedings of the Warren Couhty Common Pleas Court (the receiving state) on 30 July Petitioner was then returned to the Warren County Common Pleas Court, State of Ohio, on 7 April 2008 to face the charges relating to Indictment No. 08 CR after which, he was transported to the Montgomery County, Ohio Common Pleas Court to face charges for Indictment No CR under the same
9 interstate detainer agreement as the Warren County Common Pleas Court. After which, the Petitioner was transported to the Franklin County Common Pleas Court jurisdiction to face charges relating to Indictment No. 06CR which relied on the same interstate detainer as the Warren,County Common Pleas Court. After which, the Petitioner was transportedto the jurisdiction of the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court to answer to Indictment No. B , the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court also relying on the original interstate detainer as of the Warren County Common Pleas Court. 7. At the conclusion of the Hamilton, County; Ohio proceedings the Petitioner was transported back to the sending state (Kentucky) to finish serving his sentence imposed in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Thus, completing the shuttling of the Petitioner between the two states. IV. HABEAS STANDARD OF REVIEW Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure states: and Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure states a writ must be granted:
10 In applying ReP and/or ReP the Petitioner is entitled to relief if the record can support his claims to improper, imconstitutional confinement. V. 'HABEAS GROUND[S] FOR RELIEF THE WARREN COUNTY, THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, THE FRANKLIN COUNTY AND THE HAMILTON COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURTS LACKED CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE; DUE TO THEIR VIOLATION OF THE INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS ANTI-SHUTTLING PROVISIONS 1. Summary of Argument The convictions and sentences of the above-mentioned courts were invalidated by the said courts misapplication of provisions within the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. 1. When on 30 July 2007 the Warren County Common Pleas Court brought the defendant, David S. Hopper, before the Court via mechanical means for the purpose of arraignment. 2. The Ohio Supreme Court has held, "A properly functioning video arraignment is the equivalent of an in-court arraignment." State v. Phillips, 74 Ohio st. 3d 72, 656 N.E. 2d 643 (1995). As was supported by the Florida Supreme Court in RE Rule (a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, FNl and the Missouri Supreme Court in Guinan v. State, 769 S.W. 2d 427, 431 (1989). This principle was further delineated in, United States v. Reynolds, 44. M.J. 726 (Army Ct. Crim. App. 1996). 5
11 3. Ohio, along with a majority of other states, to include the Commonwealth of Kentucky, have entered into the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), on which these Courts relied in the present case: 4. Article III of the IAD, grants a prisoner, against whom a detainer has been lodged, the right to request a final disposition of the relevant charges; and subsequently Article IV gives the jurisdiction in which charges remain untried, the right to have a prisoner made available for trial. Alabama v. Bozeman, 533 U.S. 146, 148 at , 121 S.ct. 2079, 150 L.Ed. 2d 189 (2001). Once invoked, each article provides specific language, however they differ to a time frame, with-in a trial must be had. Each Article also contains what has come to be known as an "Anti-Shuttling" provision, prohibiting the return of a prisoner to the sending state before completion of the trial for which he was initially transferred. Article IV (e) specifies: 5. The Petitioner holds that as of his video arraignment on 30 July 2007 he was for all legal.purposes transported to the Warren County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court jurisdiction and subsequently returned to the Commonwealth of Kentucky at the close of those proceedings. Referring to Phillips, id, Guinan, id, and U.S. v. Reynolds, id. 6. Petitioner further holds that upon his transport to the Warren County (Ohio), Detention Center on 4 Apri12008, and his subsequent appearance before the 6
12 Warren County (Ohio), Common Pleas Court on 7 Aprii12008 to face charges related to indictment no. 08 CR for which he was arraigned on 30 July 2007, that the said Court had lost its constitutional legal authority in this present case. IAD Article IV (e). And that his. subsequent appearances before the Montgomery, Franklin, and Hamilton Common Pleas Courts were constitutionally invalid, for those said courts, in relying, on the same interstate detainer as of the Warren County Common Pleas Court also lacked constitutional legal authority to adjudicate the afore-mentioned indictments. 7. Petitioner, David S. Hopper, pro se, asserts that he has practiced constitutional due diligence in this present matter, in as he has sought relief from the unconstitutionally placed detainers, which are relied upon under the convictions of the said courts whom lacked effective legal authority to prosecute and sentence the petitioner. Referring to Phillips, id, Guinan, id, and U.S. v. Reynolds, id. 8. Petitioner holds that he has practiced due diligence in this present case. In that the facts as presented, are of a newly discovered nature that were unknown to his attorncy. Or, if lcnown by counsel, was not shared nor indicated to the petitioner during the course of the legal proceedings in this matter. 9. The Petitioner, David S. Hopper, at the time of the 30 July 2007 arraignment proceedings was under the psychological care of a clinical psychiatrist and a social worker specializing in the treatment of individuals suffering from a psychological disorder known as `Dysassociative Identity Disorder' (DID). Furthermore, the defendant was receiving anti-psychotic medication at the time
13 of the arraignment hearing and subsequent court related proceedings in said court[s]. The combination of the medications and mental disorder precluded the defendant from realizing the proceedings that the court[s] initiated. 10. The defendant's mental condition was known to the Warren County Detention Center medical and security staff and this information was shared with the subsequent jurisdictions, all of which, continued treatment. Thus, the Courts, through due diligence of their own could have ascertained the mental liabilities of the defendant during the course of its adjudication of the said matter. The Warren County Detention Center medical staff had spoken with a mental health professional, Carol Brady, who was privately hired by the petitioner's family for the purpose of the treatment of `Dysassociative Identity Disorder' and they, the Warren County Detention Center medical staff, had interviewed the petitioner on numerous occasions and even altered his medication to help alleviate the symptoms of the disorder. With this deep involvement of Warren, Montgomery, Franklin, and Hanulton County officials, the Courts, in their neglect to address the matter, as known, unconstitutionally denied the defendant due process. II. PRAYER FOR RELIEF A. Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus that the Petitioner be brought before the court to be discharged of his unconstitutionally instituted detainers and relieved of his unconstitutional conviction[s] and sentence[s]; or in the alternative;
14 B. Order the respondent[s] to produce the video records and pleadings from the trial level proceedings as deemed just and appropriate as well as appropriate transcripts of the video records; and, C. Order such hearings as may be necessary; and, D. Order the appointment of counsel to perfect this pro se petition as delineated in the so attached Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Appointment of Counsel. Wherefore, the Petitioner sayeth no more. Respectfully slbmitted, David S. Hopper, Pro se, Petitioner 1612 Dawkins Road LaGrange, Kentu.clcy VERIFICATION David Hopper, after being duly sworn, states that he has read this `Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus' and all statements it contains are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. David S. Hoppe"r,' Pro se, Petitioner 1612 Dawkins Road LaGrange, Kentucky 40031,
15 ,NOTARYSTATEMENT Subscribed and sworn to before me by David Scott Hopper on this 15`h day of March NOTARY PiI4IC STATE AT LARGE, KENTUCKY w commission expires. ^ ^,^8^ KY Aup.i6, 2ptd NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the foregoing Petition was mailed via first class postage to the Honorable Clerk of the Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio this 15`h day of March `a- David Pro se, Petitioner 1612 Dawkins Road LaGrange, Kentucky
16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of this pleading was mailed via first class postage to the Honorable Mike DeWine, Ohio Attorney General, 30 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215; the Honorable David P. Fornshell, State Attorney for the County of Warren, 500 Justice Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 45036; the Honorable Mathias H Heck Jr., State Attorney for the County of Montgomery, P.O. Box 972, Dayton, Ohio ; the Honorable Ron O'Brien, State Attorney for the County of Franklin, 373 South High Street, 14ih floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215; the Honorable Joseph T. Deters, State Attorney for the County of Hamilton, 230 East Ninth Street, Suite 4000 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202; on this 15a day of March David S. Hoppd Pro se, Petitioner 1612 Dawkins Road LaGrange, Kentucky
17 COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS LUTHER LUCKETT CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX (Institution) CERTIFICATION OF FUNDS DEPOSITED IN PRISONER'S INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT Inmate Name: a(first) (Middie) JN of the Z Inmate Accounts Office, do hereby certify that the sum of $ alo irl- SO has been deposited to this inmate's account during the preceding six months. Signature of Authorized Officer Date Sub cribed and worn to before me by ^ on this 244 day of _, 20 OZ,- Notary Public, State at Large My Commission expires: NGt3ry PLINHc, Sit f 'a Large, KY My Cv172`7,v :^r:a 3:".p1 es,-f:i. 4, 2c3iZ Wotzsr^, 0-14G74fi2
Amended by Order dated June 21, 2013; effective July 1, RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FIVE THE SUPREME COURT B. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Amended by Order dated June 21, 2013; effective July 1, 2013. RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FIVE THE SUPREME COURT B. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Rule 5:7B. Petition for a Writ of Actual Innocence.
More informationINSTRUCTIONS - READ CAREFULLY
IN THE COURT OF COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA Full Name of Movant Prison Number (if any) Case No. (To be supplied by the clerk of the court) v. State of Indiana, Respondent. INSTRUCTIONS - READ CAREFULLY In
More informationPETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1
9-701. Petition for writ of habeas corpus. [For use with District Court Criminal Rule 5-802 NMRA] STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT, (Full name of prisoner) Petitioner, v., (Name of warden,
More informationINMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY
INMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY (NOTE: O.C.G.A. 9-10-14(a) requires the proper use of this form, and failure to use this form as required will result in the clerk of any
More informationPERSONS IN CUSTODY. Prison Number Case No.: (To be supplied by the Clerk of the District Court) INSTRUCTIONS--READ CAREFULLY
Rule 183 KSA 60-1507 Motion (12/1/06) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF COUNTY, KANSAS PERSONS IN CUSTODY Full name of Movant Prison Number Case No.: (To be supplied by the Clerk of the District Court) vs. STATE
More informationAPPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF GEORGIA, Petitioner, Civil Action No. Inmate Number vs., Habeas Corpus Warden, Respondent (Name of Institution where you are now located) APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254 (PERSONS IN STATE CUSTODY) 1) The attached form is
More information(4) Filing Fee: Payment of a $ 5.00 filing is required at the time of filing.
Instructions for Filing a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon By a Person in State Custody (28 U.S.C. 2254) (1) To use this form, you must be a person
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2014; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2011-CA-000311-MR JEREMY EDWARD DEVERS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE
More informationAPPENDIX A. FORM PETITION READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE PREPARING THE PETITION
APPENDIX A. FORM PETITION The following form petition shall be available without cost to a prisoner in the prisons and other places of detention and shall also be available without cost to any potential
More informationCOURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SEEKING RELIEF FROM FINAL FELONY CONVICTION UNDER CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ARTICLE 11.07 INSTRUCTIONS 1. You must use this
More informationThe Court Refuses to Honor my Notice of Appeal! What do I do now!?! 1
The Court Refuses to Honor my Notice of Appeal! What do I do now!?! 1 Paul J. Notarianni 2 DISCLAIMER: This article is the property of its author, unless otherwise noted. It is made available on the Western
More informationUNIFORM APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
UNIFORM APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF No. NAME OF APPLICANT (to be filled in by the clerk) JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRISON NUMBER PARISH OF PLACE OF CONFINEMENT STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. CUSTODIAN (Warden,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2007 RONNIE KERR v. GIL MATHIS, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 06C-3361 Amanda
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel., JOHN WALTER SMILEY, JR. #545488 15802 S.R. 104 North P.O. BOX 5500 CHILLICOTHE, OHIO 45601 Relator, JUDGE G. JACK DAVIS and/or IN ORIGINAL ACTION HIS
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1
Article 89. Motion for Appropriate Relief and Other Post-Trial Relief. 15A-1411. Motion for appropriate relief. (a) Relief from errors committed in the trial division, or other post-trial relief, may be
More informationINMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
INMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY (NOTE: O.C.G.A. 9-10-14(a) requires the proper use of this form, and failure to use this form as required
More informationAPPENDIX F INSTRUCTIONS
APPENDIX F COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SEEKING RELIEF FROM FINAL FELONY CONVICTION UNDER CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ARTICLE 11.07 INSTRUCTIONS 1. You must
More informationRULE CHANGE 2018(05) COLORADO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
RULE CHANGE 2018(05) COLORADO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE District Court County, Colorado Court Address: People of the State of Colorado v. Defendant Attorney or Party Without Attorney (Name and Address):
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 25, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 25, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNETH DEANGELO THOMAS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2002-A-446
More informationINSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE
INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE 61-11-26 Petition Form Carefully read the attached form to fill out your Petition for Expungement of Criminal Records
More informationPETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND EMERGENCY RETURN OF CHILD PACKET
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND EMERGENCY RETURN OF CHILD PACKET Facts and Questions When is a writ of habeas corpus appropriate? It is used when a child is being wrongfully detained. The court
More informationRULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996
RULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996 CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGAL FOUNDATION INTRODUCTION On April 24, 1996, Senate Bill
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Stephen Person, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1763 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: April 7, 2017 Department of Corrections, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER,
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 16, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2015
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 16, 2015 - Case No. 2015-0303 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2015 R. Lotus Justice: : Relator, : : Case No. 215-0303 vs. : : Franklin County Court of Common
More informationBIRTH CERTIFICATE AMENDMENT
BIRTH CERTIFICATE AMENDMENT IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS PACKET Petitioner : The first and last name of the person who is filing this action This petition must be supported with evidence, including the enclosed
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER
[Cite as State v. Koester, 2003-Ohio-6098.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER 16-03-07 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE v. O P I N I O N ROBERT A. KOESTER DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. CV PHX-DGC (SPL) Petitioner, vs.
Case 2:14-cv-00110-DGC--SPL Document 4 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
More informationINSTRUCTIONS. 2. The clerk of the trial court in which you were convicted will make this form available to you, on request, without charge.
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SEEKING RELIEF FROM FINAL FELONY CONVICTION UNDER CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ARTICLE 11.07 INSTRUCTIONS 1. You must use the complete
More informationIN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S-2013-008 (Supersedes Administrative Order S-2012-052) CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION PROCEDURES The procedures used for
More informationPETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF (Rule 40, HRPP) Name: Prison Number Place of Confinement S.P.P. No. (to be supplied by the Clerk of the Court)
PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF (Rule 40, HRPP Name: Prison Number Place of Confinement S.P.P. No. (to be supplied by the Clerk of the Court (Full name of petitioner PETITIONER, VS STATE OF HAWAI I
More informationHOW TO FILE AN ARD EXPUNGEMENT
HOW TO FILE AN ARD EXPUNGEMENT Disclaimer by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Neither the staff in the Center nor the staff in any Court office will be able to give you legal
More informationVideo Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched
Garden State CLE 21 Winthrop Road Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 (609) 895-0046 fax- 609-895-1899 Atty2starz@aol.com! Video Course Evaluation Form Attorney Name Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46 (1:01CR45 & 3:01CR11-3)
Greer v. USA Doc. 19 Case 1:04-cv-00046-LHT Document 19 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46
More informationNo In the Supreme Court of the United States PETITIONERS
No. 03-878 In the Supreme Court of the United States PHIL CRAWFORD, INTERIM FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, PORTLAND, OREGON, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. SERGIO SUAREZ
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N
[Cite as State v. Lawrence, 2016-Ohio-7626.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee v. PHILLIP H. LAWRENCE Defendant-Appellant Appellate
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.
E-Filed Document Aug 18 2017 15:49:36 2016-CP-01539 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CP-01539 BRENT RYAN PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT v. LOWNDES COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET AL.
More informationDelinquency Hearings
Delinquency Hearings Table of Contents DETENTION HEARING AT A GLANCE... 2 ARRAIGNMENT HEARING AT A GLANCE... 3 ADJUDICATORY HEARING AT A GLANCE... 4 DISPOSITION HEARING AT A GLANCE... 5 VIOLATION OF PROBATION
More informationNOTICE OF DEMAND FOR TRIAL OR DISPOSITION PURUSANT TO PENAL CODE SECTION 1381 OR
Date District Attorney County of NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR TRIAL OR DISPOSITION PURUSANT TO PENAL CODE SECTION OR. TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COUNTY: Please take notice that I,, was sentenced on or about,
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information & Instructions: Petition to enforce foreign judgment 1. The following form, Petition to Enforce Foreign Judgment, is used to enforce a judgment obtained in a state other than Texas. 2. In order
More informationCriminal Law Table of Contents
Criminal Law Table of Contents Attorney - Client Relations Legal Services Retainer Agreement - Hourly Fee Appearance of Counsel Waiver of Conflict of Interest Letter Declining Representation Motion to
More informationF L= JUL CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No.:
WILLIAM A. CLUMM, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Relator, Case No.: 07-1140 V. OHIO DEPT. OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, et al., Respondents. MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL RECORDS OF., residing at. 1. My date of birth is,. 2. I was arrested/taken into custody on,, in
Form 1: Petition for Expungement Page 1 of 5 (Your address) (City State ZIP Code) (Your phone number) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: CRIMINAL PART COUNTY (Where you are filing) Appearing Pro
More informationPOVERTY AFFIDAVIT. This packet contains forms and information on: How to File a Case When You are Financially Unable
Superior Court of Cobb County POVERTY AFFIDAVIT This packet contains forms and information on: How to File a Case When You are Financially Unable It is advisable to have an attorney when filing legal papers
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION In re, No. A On Habeas Corpus. Related Appeal No. A County Superior Court No. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [Attorney
More informationHOW TO FILE AN ARD EXPUNGEMENT
HOW TO FILE AN ARD EXPUNGEMENT Disclaimer by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Neither the staff in the Center nor the staff in any Court office will be able to give you legal
More informationGEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures. Authority: Effective Date: Page 1 of Donald/DePetro 12/15/07 9
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures Functional Area: Subject: Interstate Detainers Revises Previous Authority: Page 1 of Donald/DePetro I. POLICY: The Georgia Department of
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 18, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 18, 2015 - Case No. 2015-0303 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO R. LOTUS JUSTICE, et al., Relators, Case No. 2015-0303 v. UNITED STATES, et al., Respondents.
More informationPETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS (Section et seq., Ala. Code 1975)
Form CR-65 Rev. 9/2017 (Assigned by Clerk) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF (Name of County) COUNTY, ALABAMA STATE OF ALABAMA,,V. (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) RESPONDENT. PETITIONER, (Street Address)
More informationacquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
GlosaryofLegalTerms acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making
More information12PREM;^O ^, Q^0 APR CLERK OFCOURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
[State of Ohio ex rel.]david Fox, Relator, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2008 vs. Case No. 08-0626 Franklin County Common Pleas Court, Original Complaint in Mandamus Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
More informationJackson County Prosecutor s Office Conviction Review Unit
Jackson County Prosecutor s Office Conviction Review Unit APPLICATION FOR CONVICTION REVIEW The Conviction Review Unit of the Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney s Office investigates only claims of actual
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James H. Deiter, : Appellant : : v. : No. 2265 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: June 27, 2014 Pennsylvania Board of : Probation and Parole, and : Superintendent Gerald Rozum,
More informationMOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
Case 4:15-cr-00001-BSM Document 81 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) No. 4:15CR00001-1 BSM ) MICHAEL A. MAGGIO
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)
Case: 13-55859 05/16/2013 ID: 8632114 DktEntry: 1-2 Page: 1 of 16 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Office of the Clerk After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)
More informationCase 1:17-cv JCH-SMV Document 1 Filed 12/27/17 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:17-cv-01264-JCH-SMV Document 1 Filed 12/27/17 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO KENNETH AGUILAR, Petitioner, Vs. VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, ACTING WARDEN Sandoval
More informationAppearing Pro Se PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL/JUVENILE RECORDS OF., residing at. 1. My date of birth is,.
Form 1: Petition for Expungement Page 1 of 5 (Mailing address) (City State ZIP Code) (Your phone number) (E-mail Address) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: CRIMINAL PART COUNTY (Where you are
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VINCENT BAILEY APPELLANT VS. NO. 2010-CP-0699 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Scott v. Shartle et al Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JASON SCOTT, Inmate Identification No. 50651-037, Petitioner, v. WARDEN J.T. SHARTLE, FCC Warden, SUSAN G. MCCLINTOCK, USP
More informationRODNEY W. DORR OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS November 1, 2012 HAROLD CLARKE, DIRECTOR
Present: All the Justices RODNEY W. DORR OPINION BY v. Record No. 112131 JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS November 1, 2012 HAROLD CLARKE, DIRECTOR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY John E. Wetsel, Jr.,
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO WRIT OF PROCEDENDO. 2. I, William D. Boyles was convicted in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Court of:
THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO WILLIAM D. BOYLES, 439-192 Case No. 12i '= v STEVEN E. MARTIN 1000 Main Street ILU NOV 21 0 Z012 CLERK O^ COURT REME COURT OF OHIO WRIT OF PROCEDENDO 2. I, William D. Boyles was
More informationCommonwealth Of Kentucky. Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JULY 29, 2005; 2:00 p.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2004-CA-001033-MR KENNETH RAVENSCRAFT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE STEVEN
More informationGDE G"E.^V ED. 0*q G/^^4 MAR QB 2091 CLERK OF COURT ISUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No vs-
0*q G/^^4 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel. ERRICK BOLDEN, RELATOR, Case No. 2011-0290 -vs- THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY MCMONAGLE, RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR, PRO SE
More informationRULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:21. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT; WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA; PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; PROBATION
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:21. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT; WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA; PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; PROBATION Rule 3:21-1. Withdrawal of Plea A motion to withdraw a plea
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 15, 2010
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 15, 2010 CALVIN WILHITE v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 09-586-IV Russell
More informationINSTRUCTION SHEET FOR CHANGING AN ADULT S NAME
INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR CHANGING AN ADULT S NAME The forms presented in this packet are designed to guide you in the preparation of your change of name. You must type in the required information as it applies
More informationVIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)
VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011) RULE Rule 1. Scope of Rules; Terms; Sessions; Seal; Filing in Superior Court. (a) Title and Citation (b) Scope of Rules (c) Authority for
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as State v. Boone, 2012-Ohio-3142.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 26104 Appellee v. WILLIE L. BOONE Appellant APPEAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 12/13/2010 :
[Cite as Rucker v. Brunsman, 2010-Ohio-6078.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY JEREMY RUCKER, : Petitioner-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2010-08-072 : O P I N I O N -
More informationF L ^P , = MAY 00 20i2. MAY i2 CLERK FC URT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, 12-0-8 4:9. On Appeal from the Hamilton County Court of Appeals First Appellate District VS. Court of Appeals William Dunn,. Case No. C-100053 Appellant.
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 4, 2003
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 4, 2003 GEORGE CAMPBELL, JR. v. BRUCE WESTBROOKS, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No.
More informationAPPENDIX A RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE MUNICIPAL COURTS
APPENDIX A RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE MUNICIPAL COURTS RULE 7:1. SCOPE The rules in Part VII govern the practice and procedure in the municipal courts in all matters within their statutory jurisdiction,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 11AP-1123 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CR-2681)
[Cite as State v. Jones, 2012-Ohio-3767.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 11AP-1123 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CR-2681) Keith L. Jones, : (ACCELERATED
More informationTitle 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL
Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL Chapter 9: CRIMINAL EXTRADITION Table of Contents Part 1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE GENERALLY... Subchapter 1. ISSUANCE OF GOVERNOR'S WARRANT... 3 Section 201. DEFINITIONS...
More informationFor forms see:
RULE 6 DOMESTIC RELATIONS (Revised 7/24/15) For forms see: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/jcs/cfc/drforms/default.asp 6.0 Application of Rule 6: Attorneys and pro se parties engaging in domestic relations
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationJuly 29, Re: Supplement to the One Hundred Sixty-Second Report of the Rules Committee
July 29, 2009 The Honorable Robert M. Bell, Chief Judge The Honorable Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. The Honorable Lynne A. Battaglia The Honorable Clayton Greene, Jr. The Honorable Joseph F. Murphy, Jr. The Honorable
More informationLOCAL RULES OF THE RIPLEY CIRCUIT & SUPERIOR COURTS INDEX
LOCAL RULES OF THE RIPLEY CIRCUIT & SUPERIOR COURTS INDEX LR69-AR8-01 - CASE ASSIGNMENT AND LOCAL CASELOAD PLAN LR69-CR10-02 - SUBMISSION OF PLEA AGREEMENTS LR69-CR13-03 - REASSIGNMENT LR69-TR79-04 - SPECIAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. HENNIS, : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant. :
[Cite as State v. Hennis, 165 Ohio App.3d 66, 2006-Ohio-41.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : C.A. Case No. 2005-CA-65 v. : T.C. Case No. 02-CR-576 HENNIS,
More informationPlease complete the form by typing or printing legibly in black ink.
Re: Petition to Terminate Temporary Guardianship of Minor This form is to be used when a natural guardian seeks to terminate a temporary guardianship pursuant to changes made in O.C.G.A. 29-4-4.1(c, which
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee
E-Filed Document Apr 4 2016 16:50:10 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT-00547-SCT 2013-CT-00547-SCT MILTON TROTTER, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee BRIEF
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS COMES NOW the Petitioner in the above captioned action, and upon the petition in this cause and
More informationTable of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PART 1 BAIL A. Surety Bond... 5 B. Cash Bond... 6 C. Personal Bond... 6
4 Bond Forfeitures Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PART 1 BAIL... 4 A. Surety Bond... 5 B. Cash Bond... 6 C. Personal Bond... 6 PART 2 SURRENDER OF PRINCIPAL DEFENDANT... 7 A. Discharge on Incarceration
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 30, 2018
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 30, 2018 01/29/2019 JIMMY HEARD v. RANDY LEE, WARDEN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Johnson County No. 2017-CR-154
More informationTITLE 18--APPENDIX INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS
US CODE--TITLE 18--APPENDIX http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title18a/18a_2_.html Page 1 of 7 9/23/2008 TITLE 18--APPENDIX INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS Pub. L. 91-538, Dec. 9, 1970, 84 Stat. 1397,
More informationFLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
In the County Court in and for County, Florida of Arrest: of Arrest: WITNESS TO DISPOSAL/DESTRUCTION NE: Date Type of Court of Court IFWCDLE 025 (09/09) COURT ORIGINAL Signature of Defendant CASE NO. TRIAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO >I- -I^^d RELATOR TITO E. MARREO MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDUMUS (COMPLAINT)
^,pal IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO >I- -I^^d LORAIN COUNTY COURT OF CASE NO: 08CR075288 COMMON PLEAS JUDGE MIRALDI 12CA010282 AND COURT REPORTER ANITA FINES and 1:13CV216 VS. Respondent, 13-06 9 9, TITO
More informationTEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED
TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED 1.1 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL Order By Daniel L. Young PART ONE STATE PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. BAIL 1.2 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL CURRENTLY
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DANIEL KEVIN SCHMIDT, : CASE NO.: SC00-2512 : Lower Tribunal No.: 1D00-4166 Petitioner, : Circuit Court No.: 00-1971 : vs. : : STATE OF FLORIDA et al., : : Respondents. : : AMENDED
More informationNo. 91,333 ROBERT EARL WOOD, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [May 27, 1999]
Supreme Court of Florida No. 91,333 ROBERT EARL WOOD, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [May 27, 1999] SHAW, J. We have for review Wood v. State, 698 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), wherein
More informationHow to file a PETITION TO EXPUNGE Summary offenses MDJ Level
How to file a PETITION TO EXPUNGE Summary offenses MDJ Level **You must remain arrest free for a period of 5 years after your conviction to qualify for this type of expungement** Disclaimer Neither the
More informationReferred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Abolishes capital punishment. (BDR )
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. ASSEMBLYMAN OHRENSCHALL FEBRUARY, 0 JOINT SPONSOR: SENATOR SEGERBLOM Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Abolishes capital punishment. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government:
More informationMatter of Harris v Uhler 2016 NY Slip Op 30973(U) May 13, 2016 Supreme Court, Franklin County Docket Number: Judge: S. Peter Feldstein Cases
Matter of Harris v Uhler 2016 NY Slip Op 30973(U) May 13, 2016 Supreme Court, Franklin County Docket Number: 2015-792 Judge: S. Peter Feldstein Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationRules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms)
As of June 0 0 0 Rules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms) PART FIVE A THE COURT OF APPEALS A. General. Rule A:. Scope, Citation, Applicability and General Provisions. (a) Scope of
More informationHow to file a PETITION TO EXPUNGE Nolle Prossed, WITHDRAWN or DISMISSED CHARGES
How to file a PETITION TO EXPUNGE Nolle Prossed, WITHDRAWN or DISMISSED CHARGES Disclaimer Neither the staff in Court Administration nor the staff in any Court office will be able to give you legal advice
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Ismail Baasit, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1281 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: February 7, 2014 Pennsylvania Board of Probation : and Parole, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION. LEGALEase. Your Rights to an Appeal in a Criminal Case in the New York State Courts
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LEGALEase Your Rights to an Appeal in a Criminal Case in the New York State Courts YOUR RIGHTS TO AN AP You have a right to appeal your conviction, including your sentence
More informationMODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850
RULE 3.987. MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF MODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850 In the Circuit Court of the Judicial Circuit, in
More information