SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT [CLASS ACTION]

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT [CLASS ACTION]"

Transcription

1 0 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT W. SKRIPKO, JR., APLC Robert W. Skripko, Jr. (SEN ) N. Broadway, nd Floor Santa Ana, California 0 Tel: () -00; Fax: () -0 DENIS & RASI, PC PaulJ. Denis (SEN 0) Ethan E. Rasi (SEN: ) N. Broadway, nd Floor Santa Ana, CA 0 Tel: () -; Fax: () -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Putative Class Representatives, TALIAH URSERY, JANNEEN PEARSON, CHRISTINA MCDONALD, and Similarly Situated Employees, and their fellow Aggrieved Employees BY_ NOV Ol 0 SULMATOHlgHS. DEPUTY 0 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT TALIAH URSERY, JANNEEN PEARSON, CHRISTINA MCDONALD, and MOES through,000, individually, and on behalf of all represented coworkers; V. Plaintiffs, SAN BERNARDINO, INC. dba INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES, a California Corporation; SIYAVOUSH SOLEIMANI, an individual, and DOES through 0, inclusive. Defendants. [CLASS ACTION] CASE:CIVDS0 JUDGE: Hon. Thomas Garza DEPT: S ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Hearing Date: November I, 0 Hearing Time::0 a.m. Dept: S Complaint Filed: February, 0 Trial Date: None Set TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: The Motion for Preliminary Approval of a Settlement came before this Court on November, 0. The Couit, having reviewed and considered the proposed Settlement Agreement, Notice, and Claim Form, the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

2 0 0 Settlement filed by the parties, the memorandum of points and authorities and declarations submitted by the parties in support thereof, any opposition and/or objection thereto, all pleadings, files and records with the Court in this action, the application of controlling case precedent and statutory authority, and good cause appearing, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:. The Court grants preliminary approval of the settlement as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and finds the terms to be within the range of reasonableness of a settlement that ultimately could be granted approval by the Court at the Final Fairness Hearing. For purposes of the settlement, the Court finds that the proposed settlement class is ascertainable and that there is a sufficiently well-defined community of interest among the Class in questions of law and fact. Therefore, for settlement purposes only, the Court grants conditional certification of the following "Class" defined as follows: "All non-exempt individuals employed at the International House of Pancakes restaurant operated by Defendants at 0 N University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0-, at any time during the period of^bru^',0 through the date of preliminary approval of this proposed class action settlement.". For purposes of the settlement, the Court further designates named Plaintiffs, TALIAH URSERY, JANNEEN PEARSON, and CHRISTINA MCDONALD, as Class Representatives, and the Robert W. Skripko, Jr., of the Law Office of Robert W. Skripko, Jr., APLC, as well as Paul J. Denis and Ethan E. Rasi, of the Law Office of Denis & Rasi, PC as Class Counsel.. The Court confirms CPT Group, Inc. as the Claims Administrator ("Administrator").. A Final Fairness Hearing on the question of whether the proposed settlement should be finally approved as fair, reasonable and adequate as to the members of the Settlement Class is scheduled in Department of the San Bernardino County Superior Court - Civil Division, located at W. Third Street, San Bernardino, CA., onnovcmbci' I, 0, at :0 a.m.. At the Final Fairness Hearing, the Court will consider: (a) whether the settlement -- ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

3 0 0 should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate for the class; (b) whether a judgment granting final approval of the settlement should be entered; and (c) whether Plaintiffs' application for an award of attorneys' fees, reimbursement of litigation expenses, and class representative enhancement should be granted.. Counsel for the parties shall file memoranda, declarations, or other statements and materials in support of their request for final approval by no later than March, 0.. Class Counsel shall file a motion for an award of attorneys' fees, reimbursement of litigation expenses and class representative enhancement by no later than March,0.. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement ("Settlement Notice"), the Settlement Claim Form ("Claim Form") and the Reminder Postcard, which are attached as Exhibits "A,""B" and "C", respectively, to the Settlement Agreement.. Within twenty-one () calendar days after entry of this Preliminary Approval Order, Defendants shall provide the Administrator with a list of the names, last known residential address, telephone numbers, dates of employment, and Social Security Numbers, for the Class and number of shifts worked by each Class Member during the Class Period ("Class Data"). Both the completeness and accuracy of the Class Data provided by Defendants will be verified in a declaration signed under penalty of perjury by Defendants' qualified representative(s). 0. The Administrator shall transmit the Settlement Notice no later than 0 calendar days after receipt of the Class Data from Defendants. ("Notice Date"). The Settlement Notice shall provide at least 0 calendar days from the Notice Date for a proposed member of the Class to submit their Claim Form, or fifteen () calendar days from the date the Second Mailing and/or deficiency notice described in the Settlement Agreement (whichever is later).. The Administrator shall send a deficiency notice to all Class Members who have irregularities in their timely submitted Claim Form. The deficiency notice will provide the Class Member no less than fifteen () calendar days from the mailing of the deficiency notice to cure the deficiency even if after the Claim Form Deadline has elapsed. -- ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

4 0 0. Unless the Administrator receives a Notice returned from the United States Postal Service, that Notice shall be deemed received by the individual in the Class to whom it was mailed.. In the event that after the First Mailing the Notice is returned by the United States Postal Service to the Administrator with a forwarding address for the intended recipient, the Administrator shall immediately r the Notice to the forwarding address, the Notice will be deemed mailed as of that date ("Second Mailing"), and the recipient will have fifteen () calendar days from the date of the Second Mailing or the Claim Form Deadline, whichever is later, to return his or her Claim Form.. The Settlement Notice shall provide at least 0 days from the Notice Date for a proposed member of the Class to submit an opt out or object to the settlement.. The Court directs the mailing of Settlement Notice and Claim Form by first class mail, return postage prepaid, to the members of the Settlement Class.. The Court finds that the forms of Settlement Notice and Claim Form to the Settlement Class regarding the pendency of the action and of this settlement, and the methods of giving notice to members of the Settlement Class constitute the best notice practicable under the circumstances and constitute valid, due, and sufficient notice to all members of the Settlement Class. They comply fully with the requirements of California Code of Civil Procedure section, California Civil Code, California Rules of Court. and., the California and United States Constitutions, and other applicable law.. Not more than thirty (0) calendar days or fewer than twenty (0) calendar days after mailing the Class Notice, the Administrator shall send one Reminder Postcard ("Ex. C") regarding the deadlines and requirements for the timely submittal of a proper Claim Form to all Class Members who have not submitted a Claim Form or a Request for Exclusion from the settlement. The postcard shall be mailed to such Class Members via first-class regular U.S. Mail, using the most current mailing address information then available for such Class Members.. The Court further approves the procedures for Class Members to participate in, opt out of, or object to the Settlement, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Notice of Pendency of Class Action. -- ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

5 To validly object to the Settlement Agreement, an objecting settlement class member must provide the following information in the written objection: (i) the objecting settlement class member's full name, current address, telephone number, and signature; (ii) the settlement class member's objections to the Settlement Agreement; (iii) the reasons for the settlement class member's objections; (iv) whether the settlement class member intends to appear at the Final Fairness Hearing with or without separate counsel; and (v) if the settlement class member intends to appear at the Final Fairness Hearing with separate counsel, the identities of all attorneys who will separately represent the settlement class member. In addition, any settlement class member objecting to the Settlement Agreement shall provide a list of any other objections submitted by the objector, or the objector's separate counsel, to any class action settlements submitted in any court in the United States, whether state, federal or otherwise, in the previous five years. If the settlement class member or the settlement class member's separate counsel has not objected to any other class action settlement in any court in the United States in the previous five years, the settlement class member shall affirmatively so state in the written objection.. The procedures and requirements for filing objections in connection with the Final Fairness Hearing are intended to ensure the efficient administration of justice and the orderly presentation of any Class Member's objection to the Settlement Agreement, in accordance with the due process rights of all Class Members.. Pending the Final Fairness Hearing, all proceedings in this action, other than proceedings necessary to carry out or enforce the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement and this Order, are stayed.. Counsel for the parties are hereby authorized to utilize all reasonable procedures in connection with the administration of the settlement which are not materially inconsistent with either this Order or the terms of the Settlement Agreement.. To facilitate administration of the Settlement pending final approval, the Court hereby enjoins all Class Members from filing or prosecuting any claims, suits or administrative proceedings regarding claims released by the Settlement unless and until such Class Members have filed valid requests to exclude themselves with the Administrator and the time for filing -- ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

6 0 0 claims with the Administrator has elapsed.. The Court orders the following Implementation Schedule for further proceedings: EVENT Last day for Defendants to provide class member data to the administrator for preparation of the Notice. Notice Date: last day for claims administrator to mail class notice and claim form to class members. Close of Opt-Out/Objection Period: (i) last day for class members to submit opt-outs; (ii) last day for class members to submit objections Close of Claims Period: last day for class TIMING No later than days from entry of this Order of Preliminary Approval- November, 0 No later than 0 days from receipt of the class member data from Defendants- December, 0 No later than 0 days from the Notice Date - January, 0 No later than 0 days from the Notice Date - members to submit claim forms. February 0, 0 Or, if applicable, days from Second Mailing-March, 0 Last day for Plaintiffs to respond to objections. No later than 0 days from the Notice Date - Last day for class counsel to file motion for award of attorneys' fees, reimbursement of litigation expenses, class representative enhancement, administration expenses Last day for Plaintiffs to file motion and supporting documents for final approval of class action settlement. Last day for Administrator to provide declaration regarding administration of the class settlement, including, mailing of Settlement Notice and Claim Form, r ings, receipt of timely Claim Forms, resolution of shift disputes, receipt of any optouts, receipt of any objections, aggregate of amount of the net settlement claimed by Qualified Claimants. Hearing on final approval of the class action settlement. Assuming the Effective Date of the Settlement has been achieved as provided for in the Settlement Agreement - Last day for Administrator to provide declaration regarding completion of the administration of the settlement, including, mailing of settlement checks to participating class members. March, 0 No later than 0 days from the Notice Date - March, 0 No later than 0 days from the Notice Date - March, 0 No later than 0 days from the Notice Date - March, 0 No later than 0 days from the Notice Date -April,0 No later than 0 days from the hearing on final approval of the class action settlement - May,0 -( ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

7 0 payment of attorneys' fees and costs, enhancement awards to the Class Representatives, forwarding of PAGA allotted proceeds to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency; transmitting of any uncashed settlement checks to the California Department of Industrial Relations in trust for the subject Class Member.. The Fairness Hearing and related prior deadlines set forth above may, from time to time and without further notice to the Settlement Class (except as to those who have filed timely and valid objections) be advanced, continued, or adjourned by Order of the Court.. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Third Amended Complaint filed concurrently with Plaintiffs' instant Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement ("Ex. D") shall be deemed filed and served as of the date of the Court's signing of this order. Defendants' Answer on filed with the Court shall be deemed to be Defendants' Answer to the amended complaint. 0 IT IS SO ORDERED. Noy a.i 0 Dated: ^, 0 By:. THOMAS GARZA HON. THOMAS GARZA Judge of the Superior Court ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

8 Exhibit A

9 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL HOURLY NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES WHO WORKED AT THE INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES RESTAURANT OPERATED AT 0 N. UNIVERSITY PARKWAY. SAN BERNARDINO. CA 0. AT ANY TIME FROM FEBRUARY. 0 TO July. 0 WHY AM I RECEIVING THIS NOTICE: You are receiving this Notice because you have been identified as an hourly non-exempt employee who worked at the International House of Pancakes restaurant operated at 0 N. University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0, by Defendants, SAN BERNARDINO, INC. dba INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES and SIYAVOUSH SOLEIMANI (collectively "Defendants"), at some time during the period of February, 0 through and including July, 0 {i.e. the date of preliminary approval of this class action Settlement). If you sign the Claim Form provided with this Notice, you will be entitled to receive a share of a proposed settlement of the class action lawsuit regarding the IHOP Restaurant PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT. THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION AS TO YOUR RIGHTS AS FURTHER DESCRIBED BELOW. A settlement has been reached between the parties in the Lawsuit pending in the San Bernardino County Superior Court entitled, Ursery, etal. v. San Bernardino, Inc., etal.. Case No. CIVDS0 (the "Lawsuit"). The Settlement of the Lawsuit ("Settlement") involves a proposed settlement class consisting of all hourly non-exempt employees, like you, who worked at the International House of Pancakes restaurant operated at 0 N. University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0 (hereinafter "University Parkway IHOP"), at any time during the period of February, 0 through and including July, 0. (the "Settlement Period") TERMS USED IN THIS NOTICE:. Administrator. The term "Administrator" means the third party neutral administrator who has been approved by the Court to process claims and distribute the proceeds of the Settlement. The Administrator chosen for this case is CPT Group, Inc.. Agreement. The terms "Agreement" or "Settlement Agreement" refer to the Settlement Agreement signed by the Parties and filed with the California Superior Court County of San Bernardino, as part of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. The Settlement Agreement is an agreement between the Plaintiffs Taliah Ursery, Janneen Pearson, Christina McDonald ("Plaintiffs") and the Defendants San Bernardino, Inc. and Siyavoush Soleimani ("Defendants") (Plaintiffs and Defendants are referred to collectively as the "Parties") concerning the Lawsuit that allows for payments as set forth in this Notice to eligible Class Members who submit valid claims to the Administrator. A full copy of the Settlement Agreement is available to view at the filing department of the San Bernardino Superior Court located at West Third St., San Bernardino, California.. Claim Form. The term "Claim Form" refers to the attached claim form. Each Settlement Class Member who wishes to participate in the Settlement must properly fill out, sign and timely return their Claim Form to the Administrator. V.I Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE -

10 . Settlement Class Member. The terms "Settlement Class Member" and "Settlement Glass Members" refers to individuals in the Settlement Glass.. Class Member Release. The term "Glass Member Release" refers to the Release each Glass Member will be bound by if they either: (a) fill out and return a valid Claim Form or (b) do not fill out and timely return a valid Claim Form and do not timely request to be excluded from the Settlement Glass. By executing and returning a valid Claim Form, the Settlement Glass Member agrees that, in return for the payments specified in the Settlement Agreement, the participating Settlement Glass Member agrees to release Defendants and the Released Parties from the Released Claims. Settlement Glass Members who do not execute and return a valid Claim Form, and who do not timely request exclusion from the Settlement Glass, agree to release Defendants and the Released Parties from all claims that were or could have been asserted in the Lawsuit by Settlement Glass Members that are related to the facts and/or claims asserted in the Lawsuit.. Class Representative Enhancements. The term "Glass Representative Enhancements" refers to the enhancement, to be approved by the Court, to be paid to each Glass Representative for her role in bringing and assisting as a named Plaintiff in the Lawsuit. The Parties have stipulated that each Glass Representative can ask the Court for up to Five Thousand Dollars ($,000) each for payment of a Glass Representative Enhancement. The amount of the Glass Representative Enhancement will be determined by the Court at the hearing for Final Approval, scheduled for January 0.. Released Claims: The term "Released Claims" means any and all claims related to employment at the University Parkway IHOP at any time during the Settlement Period, related to or which could have been brought in the Lawsuit based on the allegations in the Complaint, the First Amended Complaint, the Second Amended Complaint, the letters mailed by on behalf of Plaintiffs to the Labor Workforce Development Agency containing allegations against Defendants pursuant to the Labor Code Private Attorney General Act ("PAGA") and the proposed further amendment to the complaint to assert Plaintiffs' claims in the Lawsuit a class action. Such released claims include all claims arising out of or in connection with the claims and allegations in the Lawsuit related to employment at the International House of Pancakes located at 0 N University Parkway, San Bernardino, GA 0-, at any time during the period of February, 0 through July, 0, including, but not limited to, claims for unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime, overtime pay not paid at the regular rate, reporting time pay, standby pay, split shift pay, meal and rest break premium pay, improper wage statements, expense reimbursement, patronage, failure to indemnify expenses, unlawful deductions from tips and gratuities, failure to maintain accurate employee records (relating to hours worked and wages earned, gratuities earned and wage deductions), waiting time penalties, conversion, releases to obtain wages, claims brought pursuant to Galifornia Labor Gode sections 0 etseq., 00, 0, 0., 0, 0, 0, 0., 0, 0,,,,., 0,,, 00, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,,,,.,,.,,.,.,,,,,., 0, claims for violation of the Business and Professions Gode section 00 et al., claims for violation of the analogous provisions of the applicable Wage Order and claims brought for related penalties under PAGA.. Settlement Class: The term "Settlement Glass" refers to all of Defendants' hourly non-exempt individuals employed at the University Parkway IHOP at any time during the Settlement Period of February, 0 through July, 0 who do not request to be excluded from the Settlement Glass pursuant to the Request for Exclusion procedure described in paragraph VI(G) herein. v.! Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE -

11 . Class Representatives. The term "Class Representatives" refers to the three named Plaintiffs Taliah Ursery, Janneen Pearson, and Christina McDonald in the Lawsuit. 0. GSF. The term "GSF" means "Gross Settlement Fund." The Gross Settlement Fund is the maximum amount Defendants will pay under the Settlement. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the GSF is $,000.. NSS. The term "NSS" means "Net Settlement Sum." The Net Settlement Sum is the GSF minus, settlement administration costs, Enhancement Payments to the Class Represenatives, courtapproved attorney's fees and costs, the portion of the Settlement that is allocated to payment of penalties under the California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act ("PAGA (% of which is payable to the California Labor Workforce Development Agency ("LWDA") and % of which is payable to Qualified Claimants on a pro rata basis ("PAGA Penalty Allocation"),the employer's portion of payroll taxes attributed to the wage portion of the settlement payments made to Settlement Class Members, and payments of $,00 made each of the Plaintiffs in exchange for a General Release of their claims. The NSS will limit the total amount of money available to be paid to the Settlement Class Members.. PAGA. The term "PAGA" refers to a section of the California Labor Code known as the Labor Code Private Attorney General Act, which is found at Sections -. of the California Labor Code. PAGA is a law that allows private individuals to sue and collect, under certain circumstances, penalties for Labor Code violations with the proceeds of any applicable penalties to be allocated % to the California LWDA and % to the Qualified Claimants.. PAGA Penalty Allocation. The term "PAGA Penalty Allocation" refers to the portion of the Settlement that the Parties have allocated to settle PAGA claims in the Lawsuit. In the Settlement Agreement, the Parties have stipulated to the allocation of the sum of $,00 to the PAGA Penalty Allocation, with $, of that amount payable to the California LWDA and the remainder to be paid to Qualified Claimants on a pro rata basis.. Qualified Claimant(s). The term "Qualified Claimant(s)" refers to those Settlement Class Members that timely return valid Claim Forms to the Administrator.. Request for Exclusion. The term "Request for Exclusion" refers to a Class Member's request to be excluded from the Settlement Class. Any Settlement Class Member who wishes to exclude himself/herself from the Settlement must follow the procedure described in section VII(C) of this Notice. Any Settlement Class Member who wishes to file their own lawsuit against Defendants for any of the claims alleged in the Lawsuit must submit to the Administrator a written Request for Exclusion from this Settlement. Failure to submit a Request for Exclusion from the Settlement will result in a release of the Released Claims if the Settlement is approved by the Court. However, any Settlement Class Member who wishes to bring their own claim is advised to consult with his or her own attorney as soon as possible as applicable statutes of limitations may affect your ability to bring such claims.. Settlement. The term "Settlement Agreement" or "Agreement" refers to the Class Action Settlement Agreement executed by the parties and filed with the Court as part of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement. The Settlement is an agreement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants that allows for payments as set forth in this Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement. A copy of the Settlement Agreement is available for review at the San Bernardino Superior Court.. Settlement Period. The "Settlement Period" for the Settlement Class is February, 0 through July, 0. Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE - V.I

12 I. WHY DID I GET THIS NOTICE? The records of San Bernardino, Inc. indicate that you were/are an hourly non-exempt employee who worked at the University Parkway IHOP restaurant operated by Defendants at some time during the Settlement Period. This Notice explains that for settlement purposes only, the Court has allowed, or certified, a class action lawsuit that may affect your rights and that a Settlement has been reached in that Lawsuit. You have legal rights and options that you may exercise at this time. II. WHAT IS THIS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT ABOUT? Three workers ("Class Representatives") employed at the University Parkway IHOP operated by Defendants filed a lawsuit on behalf of themselves and their co-workers claiming that Defendants violated California labor laws allegedly by:. Failing to Pay All Earned Minimum Wages and Overtime Wages;. Failing to Pay Split Shift Minimum Wages;. Failing to Timely Pay All Earned Wages;. Failing to Pay Reporting Time and Stand-By Wages;. Failing to Pay All Earned Wages Upon Termination;. Failing to Permit 0 Minute Rest Periods;. Failing to Provide 0 Minute Meal Periods;. Failing to Reimburse Uniform and Equipment Expenses;. Unlawful Deduction From Tips and Gratuities; 0. Failing to Provide Lawful Wage Statements;. Failing to Indemnify;. Converting Wages;. Requiring employees to sign statements of the hours worked which Defendants knew to be false; that these alleged violations constitute unfair business practices; and that civil penalties under PAGA apply to those claims. Defendants deny any wrongdoing and contend that they were in compliance with all California labor laws. The Court has not ruled on whether the employees' claims have any merit. However, for the purpose of avoiding the time and expense of further litigation, the ultimate outcome of which is uncertain, and to provide fair and reasonable resolution of this legal dispute, the Class Representatives and Defendants have negotiated a settlement whereby Defendants have agreed to pay a maximum of up to two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($,000) to resolve all of the Released Claims. The Settlement is not an admission by Defendants of any liability. III. WHO IS INCLUDED IN THIS CLASS ACTION? All hourly non-exempt employees who worked at the University Parkway IHOP restaurant operated by Defendants at 0 N. University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0, at some time during the period of February, 0 and July, 0. IV. WHAT DOES THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT PROVIDE? The maximum amount of money to be paid by Defendants in this Settlement is $, ("Gross Settlement Fund" or "GSF"). From the GSF, Plaintiffs will request that the court approved third-party administrator, CPT Group, Inc. (the "Administrator"), be paid to administer the Settlement. The fees of the Administrator are estimated to not exceed $,00. Plaintiffs will request that they be paid enhancement fees as Class Representatives, to be paid from the GSF, in an amount not to $,000 each. Plaintiffs will also be paid $,00 each from the GSF in exchange for a general release of any and all claims. Plaintiffs' attorneys will request an amount for attorneys' fees in an amount not to exceed $,00, and documented reasonable costs up to $0,000, actually incurred by Plaintiffs' attorneys to be paid from the GSF. The application for attorneys' fees and costs can be examined during regular business hours at the Office of the Clerk of the San Bernardino County Superior Court, located at the San Bernardino Superior Court, W rd St, San Bernardino, CA 0. In addition, a $,00 payment will be made from the GSF for penalties pursuant to PAGA; % of which shall be V.I Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE -

13 paid to the California LWDA, and the remaining % shall be distributed to Qualified Claimants on a pro rata basis. Defendants' portion of the employer payroll taxes shall also be paid out of the GSF. Assuming that the requested amounts for attorneys' fees and costs, Class Representative Enhancements, PAGA Penalty Allocation, and the fees and costs of the Administrator are granted in full, the maximum funds for distribution to the Settlement Class (other than payments from the PAGA Penalty Allocation) if every eligible Settlement Class Member filed a valid claim, will be approximately ($###). Defendants will make payments, on what is called a claims-made basis, to Settlement Class Members who submit valid claims pursuant to the Court-approved plan of distribution as described in the Settlement. After deducting for the cost of the Administrator, the Class Representatives' Enhancements and $,00 Release payments to Plaintiffs, the amount of attorneys' fees and costs, the PAGA Penalty Allocation, and Defendants' employer portion of the payroll taxes, the remainder of the GSF (hereinafter the "Net Settlement Sum" or "NSS") will be allocated for payments to each eligible Settlement Class Member who submits a valid claim (i.e., Qualified Claimants). Qualified Claimants will also receive a portion of the % allocation of PAGA Penalty Allocation to be paid to Qualified Claimants on pro rata basis. Once the Settlement Agreement and other settlement documents are finally approved by the Court, and the Effective Date of the Settlement is achieved as provided for in the Settlement Agreement, the payment to each Qualified Claimant will be calculated as described below: Each Qualified Claimant's allocation of the NSS will be determined by dividing the NSS by the total number shifts worked by all of the Settlement Class Members during the Settlement Period resulting in a value for each shift worked by each of the Settlement Class Members. The Administrator will then take the shift value and multiply it by the number of shifts worked by each Qualified Claimant. Defendants shall have no obligation to pay out any of the NSS sums in excess of a 0% floor ("Floor") that are not claimed by Settlement Class Members pursuant to the claims process in the Settlement Agreement. If less than 0% of the NSS is claimed by Settlement Class Members, then settlement payments up to the 0% Floor, shall be allocated to Qualified Claimants on a pro rata basis. Under no circumstance shall Defendants pay in excess of the GSF of two hundred seventy five thousand dollars ($,000.00). Your individual share of the NSS will be based on the number of shifts you worked as a non-exempt hourly employee at the University Parkway IHOP during the Settlement Period. The amount of money you receive will be based on the number of shifts you worked in comparison to the total number of shifts worked by all of the Qualified Claimants. The calculations will be based on data provided by Defendants to the Administrator. V. WHAT IS THE SCOPE OF THE RELEASE? Unless you request to be excluded from the Class, you will be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement and you will release Defendants, as well as their respective past or present directors, officers, shareholders, owners, operators, employees, insurers, attorneys, and their respective spouses, heirs, and beneficiaries ("Released Parties"), from any and all claims which occurred at the International House of Pancakes located at 0 N. University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0-, at any time during the period of February, 0 through July, 0, related to or which could have been brought in the Lawsuit based on the allegations in the Complaint, the First Amended Complaint, the Second Amended Complaint, the letters mailed by on behalf of Plaintiffs to the Labor Workforce v.] Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE -

14 Development Agency containing allegations against SB -SOLEIMANI pursuant to the PAGA and the proposed amendment to the complaint to assert Plaintiffs' claims in the Lawsuit as a class action. Such released claims include all claims arising out of or in connection with the claims and allegations in this Class Action which occurred at the International House of Pancakes located at 0 N University Parkway, San Bernardino, OA 0-, at any time during the period of Februaiy, 0 through July, 0, including, but not limited to, claims for unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime, overtime pay not paid at the regular rate, reporting time pay, standby pay, split shift pay, meal and rest break premium pay, improper wage statements, expense reimbursement, patronage, failure to indemnify, unlawful deductions from tips and gratuities, failure to maintain accurate employee records (relating to hours worked and wages earned, gratuities earned and wage deductions), waiting time penalties, conversion, releases to obtain wages, claims brought pursuant to California Labor Code sections 0 et seq., 00, 0, 0., 0, 0, 0, 0., 0, 0,,,,., 0,,, 00, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,,,,.,,.,,.,.,,,,,., 0, claims for violation of the Business and Professions Code section 00 et al., claims for violation of the analogous provisions of the applicable Wage Order and claims brought for related penalties under PAGA ("Released Claims"). The release includes, without limitation, an express waiver, as to the Released Claims only, to the fullest extent permitted by law, by Plaintiffs, all Settlement Class Members, and all other Releasing Parties of any and all rights under California Civil Code section, which provides: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor." Plaintiffs and all Settlement Class Members expressly waive, as to the Released Claims only, any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law or principle of common law or equity, that is similar, comparable, or equivalent, in whole or in part, to California Civil Code section. Although there is a reference to a "general release" in California Civil Code copied above, nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall be interpreted to create a general release of claims as to the Class Members other than as to the Plaintiffs themselves. VI. WHAT ARE MY OPTIONS? A. You may accept your share of the Settlement by timely filling out and signing the attached Claim Form and returning it by: mall or overnight mail to: CPT Group, Inc., 0 Aston Street, Irvine, California 0; or insertcasename@cptgroup.com; or fax: () -; or personally delivering it to CPT Group, Inc.: 0 Aston Street, Irvine, California 0. To be valid and timely, your Claim Form must be postmarked or received by the Administrator no later than DATE. By executing the Claim Form, you are consenting to the Settlement Agreement and will be paid pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement filed with the Court. Should you have any questions regarding your Claim Form, simply contact the Administrator toll free: () ### fill If. B. You may accept your share of the Settlement but disagree with the number of shifts that you worked at the IHOP Restaurant operated at 0 N. University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0, during the Settlement Period specified in your Claim Form. If you do not agree with the number of shifts specified in your Claim Form, you should fill out the attached Claim Form and return it to the Administrator by mail, overnight mail, , fax, OR personal delivery as noted above. You should also write on the Claim Form the number of shifts that you believe you worked at the IHOP Restaurant operated at 0 N. University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0 during the Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE - V.

15 Settlement Period. You should also send any supporting documents that you have (such as paystubs) to the Administrator. The Administrator will read the documents both you and Defendants provide and make the final determination of the amount of your settlement award. YOUR CLAIM FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND POSTMARKED/RECEIVED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR NO LATER THAN DATE (0 DAYS FROM MAILING OF THIS NOTICE) TO BE VALID. C. You may exclude yourself from (not participate in) the Settlement, in which case you will not be bound by the Settlement Agreement but will not receive any portion of the Settlement. If you want to be excluded from the Settlement (also referred to as "a Request for Exclusion"), you must mail a letter to the Administrator requesting exclusion. Your Request for Exclusion letter can be as simple as "I do not want to be a part of the settlement." To be considered timely, your Request for Exclusion letter must include your full name, mailing address, telephone number, your birth date (for identity verification purposes only), signature, and be mailed by First-Class U.S. Mail to the Administrator, postmarked no later than 0 days from mailing of the Notice. If you file a timely and valid Request for Exclusion, you will no longer be a member of the Settlement Class, and you will not receive any money from the Settlement, or be able to object to the terms of the Settlement. However, if you do timely submit a Request for Exclusion, you will not be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement and may pursue any claims you may have against Defendants at your own expense. If you submit both a Claim Form and a Request for Exclusion, the Request for Exclusion will be deemed invalid and you will be bound by, and have the right to participate in, the Settlement and receive a portion of the Settlement based on the number of shifts you worked during the Settlement Period. D. You may do nothing, in which case YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT, but you will continue to be a part of the Settlement Class and the waiver and release provisions in the Settlement Agreement will apply to you. The Settlement Agreement, if approved by the Court will bind all Settlement Class Members who: (i) submit a Claim Form; (ii) do not submit a timely Request for Exclusion; OR (iii) do nothing. E. If you sign and return a Claim Form to receive a payment, OR fail to timely return your Claim Form OR if you want to exclude yourself from the Settlement but fail to properly submit a Request for Exclusion, you will be bound by the judgment contemplated by this Settlement, and will have fully and completely released Defendants and the Released Parties from the Released Claims. Regardless of which option you choose. Defendants may not and will not retaliate against you for exercising your rights under the Settlement Agreement or the law. VII. WHAT ARE THE PROCEDURES FOR PAYMENT? A. Provided the Court grants final approval of the Settlement and the Effective Date of the Settlement is achieved as provided for in the Settlement Agreement, the Administrator will calculate your share of the settlement and issue you a check if you properly complete and timely return the enclosed Claim Form..% of your share of the Settlement will be considered wages from which ordinary tax withholdings will be deducted..% of your share will be considered interest and.% will be considered penalties for which no deductions will be made for payroll-related taxes. You will be given IRS tax forms 0 for these amounts. You are responsible for paying the correct amount of taxes on each portion of your share of the settlement. The entirety of the PAGA Penalty Allocation payable to Qualified Claimants shall be considered penalties for which no deductions will be made for payroll-related taxes and you are responsible for paying the correct amount of taxes on your share of the PAGA penalty allocation. Iv.l Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE -

16 B. It is important for the Administrator to have your current address in order to be able to send you other mailings regarding the Settlement. You should contact the Administrator to report any change of your address after you receive this Notice. Failing to report a change of address may result in you not receiving your share of the Settlement. VIII. HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT A final fairness hearing will be held by the Court at a.m. on DATE, in Department S of the San Bernardino County Superior Court - Civil Division, located at W rd St, San Bernardino, CA, to decide whether or not the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate. You do not have to attend the hearing. Counsel for the parties will answer any questions the judge may have. Any Class Member who does not submit a Request for Exclusion may, if the member so desires, appear personally or through counsel at their own expense. IX. PROCEDURES FOR OBJECTING TO SETTLEMENT If you do not request exclusion from the Settlement, but you feel that any of the terms of the Settlement are not fair, you may object to the Settlement before final approval by the Court. If you wish to object to the terms of the Settlement, a written objection setting must be filed by DATE with the Office of the Clerk of the San Bernardino County Superior Court, located at W rd St, San Bernardino, CA, with copies of the objection sent to at least one of the following attorneys: ATTORNEYS REPRESENTING THE SETTLEMENT CLASS OF HOURLY EMPLOYEES LAW OFFICE ROBERT SKRIPKO, JR., PC DENIS & RASI, PC Robert W. Skripko, Jr. Paul J. Denis - Ethan E. Rasi N. Broadway, "^ Floor N. Broadway, nd Floor Santa Ana, CA 0 Santa Ana, CA 0 Tel: () -00; Fax: () -0 Tel: () -; Fax: () -0 na/skripko@skripkolaw.com erasi@denisrasilaw.com - pdenis@denisrasilaw.com Web Site: Web Site: ATTORNEYS REPRESENTING DEFENDANTS SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Attn: Jill A. Porcaro, Elizabeth M. Levy 0 Century Park East, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00-0 Tel: (0) -00; Fax: (0) 0- To validly object to the Settlement Agreement, an objecting Settlement Class Member must provide the following information in the written objection: (i) the objecting Settlement Class Member's full name, current address, telephone number, and signature; (ii) the reasons for the Settlement Class Member's objections; (iii) whether the Settlement Class Member intends to appear at the Final Fairness Hearing with or without separate counsel; and (iv) if the Settlement Class Member intends to appear at the Final Fairness Hearing with separate counsel, the identities of all attorneys who will separately represent the Settlement Class Member. Iv.l Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE -

17 If you do not object in the manner described above, you will have given up and waived your right to object to the Settlement. If you file an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you have filed and served your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend the final approval hearing. X. EXAMINATION OF COURT PAPERS AND INQUIRIES This Notice summarizes the Settlement. You may view a complete copy of the Settlement Agreement and any of the papers filed in the Lawsuit at the Filing Department of the San Bernardino County Superior Court - Civil Division, located at W rd St, San Bernardino, CA. PLEASE DO NOT CALL THE COURT. If you have any questions or comments regarding this Notice, the claims asserted in this Class Action and/or your rights regarding the Settlement, you may contact the Attorneys representing the Settlement Class of Hourly Employees or the Administrator. PLEASE DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT OR THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THIS SETTLEMENT OR CLAIM PROCESS! BY ORDER OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT V. I Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE -

18 Exhibit B

19 CLAIM FORM CLASS SETTLEMENT BETWEEN HOURLY NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES WHO WORKED AT THE INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES RESTAURANT OPERATED AT 0 N. UNIVERSITY PARKWAY. SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. BY DEFENDANTS. SAN BERNARDINO. INC. AND SIYAVOUSH SOLEIMANI (COLLECTIVELY "SB -SOLEIMANI"). AT ANY TIME DURING THE PERIOD OF FEBRUARY. 0 THROUGH JULY. 0 (/.E. THE DATE OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THIS PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT). You have been identified as a class member in a class action lawsuit involving SAN BERNARDINO, INC. dba INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES and SIYAVOUSH SOLEIMANI ("Defendants"). Along with this Claim Form, you are being sent the Notice of Class Action Settlement. Read the Notice carefully as it describes and affects your rights. The Notice Company ID «Name» «Address» «Address» «City»,«State» «Zip Code» Name/Address changes: (if any): INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING CLAIM FORM To receive your share of the proposed settlement, you must complete and sign this Claim Form and return it by U.S. MAIL, OVERNIGHT MAIL, OR PERSONAL DELIVERY to the court appointed Administrator: CRT Group, Inc. 0 Aston Street, Irvine, CA 0; OR BY FAX: --, OR BY UrseryvSB@cptgroup.com. You must return this Claim Form by [XXX]. Late Claim Forms will not be accepted. If you do not timely return the completed Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in the settlement fund, but you will still be bound by the terms of the settlement unless you have requested to be excluded from (decided not to participate in) the Settlement by following the procedure specified in the Notice. Your settlement share has been calculated based on the following estimated number of shifts you worked at the International House of Pancakes restaurant operated at 0 N. University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0, at any time during the period of February, 0 through July, 0. Estimated Number of Shifts: Estimated Settlement Share: $ If you disagree with the estimated number of shifts attributed to you, you must sign and return this Claim Form, along with a letter, to the Administrator stating your disagreement and the estimated number of shifts you were employed at the International House of Pancakes restaurant operated at 0 N. University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0, at any time during the period of February, 0 through July, 0. Include any papenwork that supports your position. The Administrator's contact information is: The CPT Group, Inc., 0 Aston Street, Irvine, CA 0; Fax: --, UrseryvSB@cptgroup.com. You must return this Claim Form by [xxx]. Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE --XXX-XXXX "CRT Group, Inc. is not liable for illegible or incomplete fax transmissions. Please retain proof of fax for your records.

20 If you have any questions, please contact the Claims Administrator Toll Free at () ififlf IIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS: I declare that I have read the Notice of Class Action Settlement, agree to be bound to the Release and other terms of the settlement described in the Notice, am entitled to the settlement payment, and that no other person and/or entity has a claim to any settlement monies that I will receive. By signing this Claim Form, I agree to release Defendants, their respective past or present directors, agents, officers, shareholders, owners, operators, employees, insurers, attorneys, accountants, successors and assigns and their respective spouses, heirs, and beneficiaries, from the following: Any and all claims related to employment at the International House of Pancakes located at 0 N University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0-, at any time during the period of February, 0 through July, 0, related to or which could have been brought in the Class Action based on the allegations in the Complaint, the First Amended Complaint, the Second Amended Complaint, the letters mailed by on behalf of Plaintiffs to the Labor Workforce Development Agency containing allegations against Defendants pursuant to the Labor Code Private Attorney General Act ("PAGA") and the proposed amendment to the complaint to assert a class action. Such released claims include all claims arising out of or in connection with the claims and allegations in this Class Action related to employment at the International House of Pancakes located at 0 N University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 0-, at any time during the period of February, 0 through July, 0, including, but not limited to, claims for unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime, overtime pay not paid at the regular rate, reporting time pay, standby pay, split shift pay, meal and rest break premium pay, improper wage statements, expense reimbursement, patronage, failure to indemnify expenses, unlawful deductions from tips and gratuities, failure to maintain accurate employee records (relating to hours worked and wages earned, gratuities earned and wage deductions), waiting time penalties, conversion, releases to obtain wages, claims brought pursuant to California Labor Code sections 0 etseq., 00, 0, 0., 0, 0, 0, 0., 0, 0,,,,., 0,,, 00, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,,,,.,,.,,.,.,,,,,., 0, claims for violation of the Business and Professions Code section 00 et al., claims for violation of the analogous provisions of the applicable Wage Order and claims brought for related penalties under PAGA. Date: Signature:. TO RECEIVE YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT, YOU MUST ENTER ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION, SIGN AND RETURN THIS CLAIM FORM ON OR BEFORE DATE. Page of QUESTIONS? CALL TOLL FREE --XXX-XXXX *CPT Group, Inc. Is not liable for Illegible or Incomplete fax transmissions. Please retain proof of fax for your records.

- 1 - Questions? Call:

- 1 - Questions? Call: Patrick Sinay, et al. v. Essendant Co., et al. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC651043 ATTENTION: ALL CURRENT AND FORMER HOURLY-PAID OR NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Perez, et al. v. Centinela Feed, Inc. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC575341 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY To: A California

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Daniel L. Warshaw (SBN 185365) Bobby Pouya (SBN 245527) PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Tel: (818)

More information

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC CPT ID: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC1305688

More information

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A To: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Antoine Turnage v. Joerns LLC, et al., Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG16808099 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

More information

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM. Pursuant to Section IV of the Notice, I hereby wish to change the mailing address on record for the remainder of this matter.

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM. Pursuant to Section IV of the Notice, I hereby wish to change the mailing address on record for the remainder of this matter. RE: JAVIER MATTER C/O RUST CONSULTING, INC. - 5273 P.O. BOX 2396 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* - UAA

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMY WOODS, JOSHUA FROST, JORDAN KNOWLES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS Oscar Torres and Anthony Quintana, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, vs. Plaintiffs, Salinas Farm Labor

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

More information

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mike Arias (State Bar No. 115385) Mikael Stahle (State Bar No. 182599) Alfredo Torrijos, Esq. (State Bar No. 222458)

More information

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix

More information

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY!

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY! SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY! YOU ARE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT UNDER THIS SETTLEMENT IF YOU WORKED FOR COIT SERVICES, INC. (dba

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CPT ID SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALL PERSONS WHO WORKED FOR DEFENDANT ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JAVIER PEREZ, as an individual and

More information

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT EXHIBIT 1 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement ( Settlement Agreement ) is reached by and between Plaintiff Sonia Razon ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all members of the

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PATRICK BIGNARDI and AARON BARRETT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, FLEXTRONICS AMERICA LLC; and DOES

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: Salazar v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Pending before the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles Case No. BC556145 If you worked for Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ( Sedgwick

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RUBEN AMAYA; individually, an on behalf of other members of the

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO If You Are or Were a Non-Exempt Employee of Gale Pacific USA, Inc., or Worked for Gale Pacific USA, Inc. as a Temporary Worker,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Jeffrey Spencer, Esq. Spencer Law Firm 0 Calle Amanecer, Suite 0 San Clemente, California Telephone:.0. Facsimile:.0.1 jps@spencerlaw.net Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. Lakeshore Law Center Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite

More information

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ( NOTICE ) Mark Thompson v. Professional Courier & Newspaper Distribution, Inc., et al. Case No. BC568018 600 South Commonwealth Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90005 If you are

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT MarketStar Wage and Hour Cases Case No. JCCP004820 If you were employed by either MarketStar Corporation or Pierce Promotions and Events Management LLC in the State of

More information

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. ("LA QUINTA") YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. (LA QUINTA) YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Sergio Peralta, et al. v. LQ Management L.L.C, et al. United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 3:14-cv-01027-DMS-JLB ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. United States District Court, Central District of California Case No. 2:14-cv-04378 (RGk) SHx THIS NOTICE

More information

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Emily Hunt v. VEP Healthcare, Inc. Case No. 16-cv-04790 A court authorized this notice.

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix Corp., et al United

More information

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET... NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING Frank Ortegon-Ramirez v. Cedar Fair, L.P., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (CASE NO. 1-13-CV-254098)

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Case No. RG06254835) A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement IF YOU WORKED FOR BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS A DEDICATED SERVICE DIRECTOR, TREASURY SERVICES

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA JULIUS DENNIS V. PLANETECHS, LLC PABLO LINN V. PLANETECHS, LLC GREGORY TATUM V. PLANETECHS, LLC CASE NOS. 15CV000787, RG16799430 and 16CV00363

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION CONCERNING SEVERANCE CLAIMS The United States Bankruptcy Court for

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE HEATHER DAVIS, SBN AMIR NAYEBDADASH, SBN PROTECTION LAW GROUP, LLP Main Street, Suite A El Segundo, CA 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHARD RAMMER and ROBERT KINSCH SUPERIOR

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 RICHARD A. HOYER (State Bar No. 151931) rhoyer@hoyerlaw.com 2 RYAN L. HICKS (State Bar No. 260284) rhicks@hoyerlaw.com 3 HOYER & HICKS 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 4 San Francisco, California 94111

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK NASSAU COUNTY YAKOV KHAIMOV AND BORIS ILYAYEV, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, -against- Index No.: 2012/003215 JEM CATERERS OF

More information

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods;

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods; SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA TYRONE WINDHAM, TERRY COLLINS, and TIMOTHY DAVIS, et al. V. T.F. LOUDERBACK, INC. dba BAY AREA BEVERAGE COMPANY, ET AL. - CASE NO. MSC16-00861

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

Case3:10-cv JSW Document47-2 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 58

Case3:10-cv JSW Document47-2 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 58 Case:0-cv-00-JSW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0 MORRIS J. BALLER, CA Bar No. 0 mballer@gdblegal.com JAMES KAN, CA Bar No. 0 jkan@gdblegal.com GOLDSTEIN, DEMCHAK, BALLER, BORGEN & DARDARIAN 00 Lakeside Drive,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA CHARLES GLASS, and ) RONNIE JENNINGS, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) CV 2014-900163 BLACK WARRIOR ELECTRIC ) MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, ) Defendant. ) NOTICE OF CLASS

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Richard Terry v. Hoovestol, Inc. Case No. 3:16-cv-05183-JST A court authorized this notice. This is

More information

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 29229 Canwood

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION PAWEL I. KMIEC, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/ :28 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/ :28 PM FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/2016 08:28 PM INDEX NO. 103948/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2016 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT A SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS JOHN STELL and CHARLES WILLIAMS, ) JR., on behalf of themselves individually ) and as class representatives on

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P. Case No.: 2014 CA

More information

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Rodriguez v. El Toro Medical Investors Settlement Administrator PO Box. 404041 ETZ «Barcode» Postal Service: Please do not mark barcode Claim#: ETZ-«Claim8»-«CkDig» «First1» «Last1» «Addr1» «Addr2» «City»,

More information

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705 Case :0-cv-00-R-CW Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 JOSEPH J. TABACCO, JR. # Email: jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com NICOLE LAVALLEE # Email: nlavallee@bermandevalerio.com BERMAN DeVALERIO One California

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA Exhibit 1 ALAN HARRIS, Bar No. 0 PRIYA MOHAN, Bar No. HARRIS & RUBLE North Central Avenue, th Floor Glendale, CA 0 Telephone:.. Fax No.:..00 DAVID S. HARRIS, Bar No. NORTH BAY LAW GROUP E. Blithedale Ave.,

More information

v. No. D-202-CV MAILED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

v. No. D-202-CV MAILED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF BERNALILLO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT VINCENT R. GARCIA, ROBERTO BORBON, MARK MORAN, and KENNETH A. ZIEGLER, on behalf of Themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Paul T. Cullen, Esq. (#193575 THE CULLEN LAW FIRM, APC 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, CA 91301-1555 Tel: (818 360-2529; (626 744-9125

More information

Plaintiffs, Defendants. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Plaintiffs, Defendants. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU ALYSSA PAWELSKY and BRIANAH TOMMY, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Index No.: 603315/2015 Plaintiffs, -against-

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Settlement Agreement, Settlement or Agreement ), is entered into by and between Hotel

More information

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 1 1 1 Brian S. Kabateck, SBN 1 bsk@kbklawyers.com Cheryl A. Kenner, SBN 0 ck@kbklawyers.com KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP S. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 00 Phone: () -000 Fax: () -0 Raul Perez, SBN

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION DocuSign Envelope ID: C0B-C--FD-0BFFEA 0 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT Erick Grumm, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, Plaintiff vs.

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you purchased goods or services using a credit card from a Lowe s store in Massachusetts

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Subject to final approval by the Court, this Settlement Agreement is between Plaintiff Emily Hunt ( Plaintiff or Hunt or Named Plaintiff ) and Defendant VEP Healthcare,

More information

PLEASE READ THIS CLASS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED BY IT.

PLEASE READ THIS CLASS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED BY IT. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Mata et al. v. Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, Case No. 5:14-cv-03787 As a current or former non-exempt associate of

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Eric B. Kingsley, CA Bar No. 185123 2 eric@kingsleykingsley.com Kelsey M. Szamet, CA Bar No. 04 3 kelsey@kingsleykingsley.com KINGSLEY & KINGSLEY, APC 4 16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200 Encino, CA 91436

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (UNLIMITED JURISDICTION)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (UNLIMITED JURISDICTION) Steven C. Wolan (State Bar No. ) Andrea S. Carlise (State Bar No. ) Clariza C. Garcia (State Bar No. ) PATTON WOLAN CARLISE, LLP Harrison Street, Suite 0 Oakland, CA 1- Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: ()

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County

Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County IF YOU WERE A PIECE-RATE FARM WORKER FOR MMP ORCHARDS, LLC, IN WASHINGTON AT ANY TIME FROM FEBRUARY 21, 2014 THROUGH JULY 13, 2015, YOU ARE ELIGIBLE

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GREGORY M. JORDAN, ELI GOLDHABER and JOSEPHINA GOLDHABER individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NICHOLAS CHALUPA, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Other ) No. 1:12-cv-10868-JCB Persons Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST and THEODORE HYER, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. ICG, INC. a/k/a INTERNATIONAL COAL

More information

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into as of July 24, 2017, between (a) Plaintiff Jordan

More information

"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~ I 1 1 1 David Spivak (SBN ) david@spivaklaw.com THE SPIVAK LAW FIRM Wilshire Blvd., Ste 0 Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: () 0 Facsimile: () - "Uge SHERRI R BY wij ~1 ~ Attorneys for Plaintiffs, CRYSTAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING DONNA MOORE, FRENCHOLA HOLDEN, and KEITH MCMILLON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs,

More information

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 55-1 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 38 STIPULATED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 55-1 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 38 STIPULATED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 6:13-cv-00358-AA Document 55-1 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 38 STIPULATED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement ) is entered into between named

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re INTERMUNE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-03-2954-SI CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case4:13-cv-02132-YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM

More information

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT NASSAU COUNTY

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT NASSAU COUNTY NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT NASSAU COUNTY ) HARRY RUIZ and ELIEZER RUIZ, individually and ) on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) -against- ) Index No.: 600317/2010 ) SCOTTO

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Audino,

More information

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court authorized this

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA Case :-cv-000-bro-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. cbaker@bakerlp.com MIKE CURTIS, State Bar No. mcurtis@bakerlp.com BAKER & SCHWARTZ, P.C. Montgomery Street, Suite

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION Coordination Proceeding JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO. 4256 VERISIGN CASES

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637 Exhibit A Case: 1:14-cv-01981 Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 2 of 32 PageID #:638 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

Case 1:14-cv GLR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 88 APPENDIX I

Case 1:14-cv GLR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 88 APPENDIX I Case 1:14-cv-00807-GLR Document 118-1 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 88 APPENDIX I Case 1:14-cv-00807-GLR Document 118-1 Filed 05/26/17 Page 2 of 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHARMAINE

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU ARE NOT BEING SUED. A FEDERAL COURT AUTHORIZED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. CASE NAME AND DOCKET NUMBER: CHELSEA KOENIG V.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Agreement ) is entered into as of the last date of any signature below by and among: (a) (b) Swedish Health

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER WAGE GARNISHMENT. Self Help Center Loca ons:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER  WAGE GARNISHMENT. Self Help Center Loca ons: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER www.occourts.org/self-help WAGE GARNISHMENT All documents must be typed or printed neatly. Please use black ink. Self Help Center Loca ons:

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made by and between Martin Petersen, Susan Hurtado, Joseph Sarasua, and Charleen Swaney (collectively, Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves

More information

EXHIBIT 1. Settlement Agreement. (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey)

EXHIBIT 1. Settlement Agreement. (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey) Case 4:14-cv-02505-YGR Document 80-2 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 26 EXHIBIT 1 Settlement Agreement (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey) EXHIBIT 1 Settlement Agreement (to Declaration of Christina A.

More information

-2- First Amended Complaint for Damages, Injunctive Relief and Restitution SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC ATTORNEY S AT LAW TEL: (510)

-2- First Amended Complaint for Damages, Injunctive Relief and Restitution SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC ATTORNEY S AT LAW TEL: (510) 0 0 attorneys fees and costs under, inter alia, Title of the California Code of Regulations, California Business and Professions Code 00, et seq., California Code of Civil Procedure 0., and various provisions

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HARLEY SEEGERT v. Case No. 37-2017-00016131-CU-MC-CTL P.F. CHANG S CHINA BISTRO, INC., et al. TO: NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RAMON GOMEZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIDZ.COM, INC., and DAVID ZINBERG, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Defendants

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re PROVIDIAN FINANCIAL CORP. SECURITIES ) Master File No. C 01-3952 CRB LITIGATION ) ) ) This Document Relates to:

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued. NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION LAWSUIT Brown, et al. v. Health Resource Solutions, Inc., et al. Case No. 16-cv-10667, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

More information