NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT"

Transcription

1 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT MarketStar Wage and Hour Cases Case No. JCCP If you were employed by either MarketStar Corporation or Pierce Promotions and Events Management LLC in the State of California between November 10, 2010 and May 24, 2017, you may be eligible to receive a payment from a class action settlement. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against MarketStar and Pierce that affects your rights. The settlement resolves related class action lawsuits against MarketStar Corporation ( MarketStar ) and Pierce Promotions and Events Management LLC ( Pierce ) (together, the Defendants ) alleging that they did not pay employees all the wages they were owed. The Court still has to decide whether to finally approve the settlement. Payments will be made only if the Court approves the settlement and after any appeals are resolved. Please be patient. YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING AND RECEIVE YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT AWARD REQUEST TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE SETTLEMENT OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT DISPUTE THE CALCULATION OF YOUR WORKWEEKS You do not need to do anything to receive a share of the Settlement. If you qualify for a payment, you will receive a Settlement Payment, and you will give up any rights to sue the Defendants separately about the same legal claims contained in this Lawsuit. See Sections below. Ask to be excluded by August 15, Get no payment. Retain the right to file your own lawsuit for the same claims. See Section 10 below. File an objection by August 15, 2017 that the settlement is unfair or inadequate. See Section 11 below. Your settlement share is calculated based on the number of weeks you worked for Defendants. This number was included on your postcard notice. If you need to know this number, you can call If you believe the calculation of your work weeks is incorrect, you must write to the Settlement Administrator at RG/2 Claims Administration LLC, Attn: MarketStar Wage and Hour Cases, P.O. Box 59479, Philadelphia, PA and provide proof in support of your claim by July 31, See Section 24 below. Please read this Notice carefully. It describes your rights, and the steps you have to take to receive money from the settlement or to exclude yourself from the settlement. 1

2 1. What is this class action about? BASIC INFORMATION On November 10, 2014, Plaintiff Malachi Smith filed a lawsuit in Riverside County Superior Court and on December 24, 2014, Plaintiffs Gregg Scott McGrath, Timothy Robert Bludworth, and Elias Ruiz filed a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court. Both lawsuits were coordinated into one proceeding before the Alameda County Superior Court (the Lawsuit ). The Lawsuit alleges that certain employees of Defendants in California who were employed as sales representatives, kiosk managers, and/or retail sales managers on behalf of Defendants client, Verizon Communications, Inc., from November 10, 2010 through May 24, 2017 failed to receive pay for all hours worked, pay for all commissions earned, legally compliant meal and rest periods, reimbursements for all necessary job expenditures, accurate wage statements, and all earned wages due and owing immediately upon termination of employment. Defendants position is that they paid their employees all amounts due and owed, provided all meal and rest breaks, and otherwise fully complied with the law. 2. How do MarketStar and Pierce respond? Defendants have denied and continue to deny all of the Plaintiffs allegations. They contend that the lawsuit could not be maintained as a class action if it were litigated and that they have not violated the California Labor Code or the California Unfair Competition Law. 3. What is a class action and who is involved? In a class action lawsuit, one or more people called Class Representatives sue on behalf of other people who have similar claims. The Class Representatives in this case are Malachi Smith, Greg Scott McGrath, Timothy Robert Bludworth, and Elias Ruiz. The employees they represent are the Class or Class Members. The Class Representatives and all the Class Members are called the Plaintiffs. MarketStar and Pierce are called the Defendants. One court resolves the issues for everyone in the Class, except for those people who request to exclude themselves from the Class. 4. Why is this lawsuit being settled? After lengthy negotiations before two mediators, the Class Representatives and Defendants, they agreed to settle this case rather than go to trial. The settlement represents a compromise of disputed claims and is not an admission that the Defendants violated the law. The parties and their attorneys believe the settlement is in the best interests of the class given the risks and expense of going to trial. Page 2 of 10

3 5. Has the Court decided who is right? No. The Court has not decided anything yet. 6. Who is the Settlement Administrator? The settlement administrator is a third party appointed by the Court to send this postcard notice, process and issue settlement checks, to maintain the settlement website, and otherwise administer the settlement. You may contact the settlement administrator to provide updated contact information, make corrections regarding your employment information at MarketStar or Pierce, or ask questions regarding the processing of settlement awards. You may contact the settlement administrator at: 7. Who is part of this Class? RG/2 Claims Administration LLC Attn: MarketStar Wage and Hour Class Action Settlement P.O. Box Philadelphia, PA YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS The Class includes: all persons currently or formerly employed by Defendants MarketStar or Pierce in the State of California, as sales representatives, kiosk managers, and/or retail sales managers on behalf of Defendants client, Verizon Communications, Inc., from November 10, 2010 through and including May 24, The Settlement Class excludes all persons who timely opt out of the Settlement. (If you have filed or want to file your own lawsuit and not be part of this case, read Section 10 below). 8. What does the settlement provide? Defendants have agreed to pay a total settlement amount of $875,000 (the Gross Settlement Amount ) to settle the Lawsuit. The settlement will provide payments for claims for alleged violations of California laws and the Fair Labor Standards Act ( FLSA ), which is the federal wage-and-hour law. The following sums will be paid from the Gross Settlement Amount: (1) $20,000 in payments under the California Private Attorney General Act ( PAGA ); (2) Plaintiffs attorneys fees in an amount set by the Court, up to $306,250 ; (3) litigation expenses (including court costs) incurred on behalf of Plaintiffs and the Class in connection with the Lawsuit, in an amount to be set by the Court, not to exceed $35,000; (4) a service payment to the four Page 3 of 10

4 Class Representatives, Malachi Smith, Greg Scott McGrath, Timothy Bludworth, and Elias Ruiz, in an amount set by the Court not to exceed $5,000 to each of them, for their services in the Lawsuit, and (5) a reasonable amount set by the Court to the settlement administrator for administering the settlement, estimated to be approximately $10,000. (See Sections for more information about these payments.) The amount of the Gross Settlement Amount remaining after these payments is the Net Settlement Fund. In return, Class Members who do not timely request to be excluded from the Class will release any claims they might have against Defendants that were or could have been raised in the lawsuit, based on the allegations in the lawsuit. For more information about the claims being released as part of the settlement, see Section 26 below. For more information about your estimated payment and the way it was calculated, see Sections below. 9. How do I participate in the settlement? You do not need to do anything to participate. You will automatically receive a settlement payment and release claims against Defendants unless you request to be excluded from the settlement. 10. How do I request to be excluded from the settlement? If you wish to be excluded from the settlement, you must write the Settlement Administrator at the address specified above in Section 6 and request to be excluded. Your request must include: (1) your name, (2) the last four digits of your social security number, (3) your address, (4) your telephone number, (5) your written statement that you have reviewed the notice and request to be excluded from the Settlement, and (6) your dated signature. To be effective, your request must be postmarked no later than August 15, If you do not complete and mail on time a valid request to be excluded from the settlement, you will be bound by all terms and conditions of the settlement, including its release of claims. If you do submit a timely and valid request to be excluded, you will not receive any money from the settlement, but you will retain the right to sue Defendants separately about the same legal claims in this lawsuit. 11. May I object to the settlement? If you believe the settlement is unfair or inadequate, you may object, personally or through an attorney, by mailing a copy of your objection to the Settlement Administrator at the address set forth above in Section 6. You cannot object to the settlement and exclude yourself from the settlement. To be effective, your objection must include: (1) your name, (2) the reason why you object to the settlement, (3) a statement of whether you intend to appear at the final approval hearing, (4) a list of any documents or witnesses you contend support your objection, and Page 4 of 10

5 (5) your dated signature. To be effective, your objection must be postmarked no later than August 15, Do not telephone the Court. If the Court rejects your objection, you will still be bound by the terms of the settlement. You will not be able to exclude yourself from the settlement. 12. When is the final fairness hearing? A final approval hearing on the fairness and adequacy of the proposed settlement will be held on September 27, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. in Department 17 of the Superior Court of California in and for the County of Alameda, located at 1221 Oak Street, Oakland, California. The final approval hearing may be continued without further notice. If the settlement is not approved, the lawsuit will continue to be prepared for trial or other judicial resolution. 13. When will I receive my payment? Payments will be sent 65 days after the Court gives the settlement its final approval. However, if any appeal is filed, payments will be delayed until appeals are finally resolved in favor of the settlement. Please be patient. 14. Do I have a lawyer in this case? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU The Court has determined that four law firms are qualified to represent you and all Class Members. Lawyers for these firms are called Class Counsel. They are experienced in handling similar cases. Their contact information is at the end of this Notice. 15. May I get my own lawyer? You do not need to hire your own lawyer because Class Counsel is working on your behalf. Nonetheless, you may hire your own lawyer if you wish. If you hire your own lawyer, however, you are responsible for paying for that lawyer. 16. How will Class Counsel be paid? You do not have to pay Class Counsel s fees and costs. The fees and expenses that the Court approves will be paid from the fund established by Defendants for the benefit of the Class. More information about the attorneys fees and costs is contained in Section 18 below. Page 5 of 10

6 TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT 17. What have MarketStar and Pierce agreed to do? Defendants have agreed to pay $875,000 to resolve the claims of the Settlement Class (the Gross Settlement Fund ). Your share of the Net Settlement Fund will be determined by a formula based on the number of weeks you worked for Defendants in California between November 10, 2010 and May 24, 2017, as determined by Defendants records. ( Qualifying Work Weeks ). Precise details of the allocation formula are described in the Stipulation for Class Action Settlement & Release of Claims (the Settlement Agreement ), which is available on the settlement website, RG2 Claims Administration (the Settlement Administrator ) will calculate each Settlement Class Member s potential share of the Net Settlement Fund, and each Class Member will get a pro-rata share. A description of the formula is below in Section How much will the attorneys get? Class Counsel will ask the Court for a maximum of $306,250 (or 35% of the Gross Settlement Fund) to pay for their attorneys fees in connection with their work in this case. Class Counsel will also request reimbursement of their costs and expenses that were advanced in connection with this case, currently estimated at a maximum of $35,000. Class members are not personally liable for any fees and costs. 19. What is a service award? In class actions such as this one, a court may provide the class representatives a service award in recognition of the time, effort, and risks the class representatives took to prosecute the class action. In the present case, the Settlement provides that the service awards will not exceed $5,000 each to Malachi Smith, Greg Scott McGrath, Timothy Robert Bludworth, and Elias Ruiz. 20. What are the PAGA payments, and why does the Labor Workforce Development Agency receive $15,000? California s Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 ( PAGA ) allows private citizens to step into the State s shoes and recover civil penalties for violations of California s Labor Code. Seventy-five percent of any such recovery must be given to the state. In this case, the Settlement provides for $20,000 in penalties, of which $15,000 (75%) is paid to the State as its share of the penalties recovered in this case. The remaining $5,000 is distributed to Class Members as part of the Net Settlement Fund. Page 6 of 10

7 21. How much will it cost to administer the Settlement? It is estimated that it will cost approximately $10,000 to fully administer the settlement. 22. How will the Net Settlement Fund be distributed to Class Members? The Net Settlement Fund, described above, will be distributed to Class Members by calculating the number of qualifying work weeks worked by each Class Member during the Class Period, and dividing that number by the sum of all qualifying work weeks worked by all Class Members to determine the share of the Net Settlement Fund to which each Class Member is entitled. Each Class Member will then receive that share of the Net Settlement Fund. For example, if there are a total of 4,000 workweeks worked by all Settlement Class Members during the Class Period, and a Settlement Class Member worked 100 workweeks during that period, then the Settlement Class Member will receive 2.5% of the Net Settlement Fund. Any amounts left after all participating Class Members are identified and paid (e.g., uncashed or unclaimed checks) will be distributed to Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino as the designated cy pres beneficiary of the Settlement. 23. Will I have to pay taxes on my award? One-third (33 and 1/3%) of your award will be considered to be wages and will be reported on IRS Form W-2 with all appropriate taxes withheld. The rest of your award will be reported on IRS Form You should consult a tax professional for more information about your own specific situation. 24. How will my share of the settlement be calculated? Your share of the settlement will be calculated based on the total number of qualifying work weeks you worked during the Class Period To confirm the number of workweeks that Defendants records show that you worked, you can call This is also the number reported on your postcard notice, which you should have received in the mail. If this information is incorrect and you wish to correct the information, you must submit a signed, written statement explaining why you dispute this information. Attach copies (not originals) of any relevant documents supporting your dispute. You must mail the signed and completed statement to the Settlement Administrator at the address set forth above in Section 6 no later than July 31, Page 7 of 10

8 If your signed and completed statement is not postmarked by this date, you will not be able to dispute the calculation of your settlement share. After consultation with you, Class Counsel, and Defendants, the settlement administrator will make a final determination that will be binding on you and you will not be able to appeal. 25. What is my estimated share of the settlement? Based on the records supplied to the settlement administrator, the estimated settlement award is $68.08 per work week. Please note that this amount may change depending on various factors, including the number of class members who request to be excluded from the settlement. RELEASE OF CLAIMS 26. What claims are being released as part of the settlement? All participating class members (all class members other than those who validly request to exclude themselves from the settlement) will be releasing their right to sue Defendants for the claims in this lawsuit. The release generally covers all claims or causes of action against Defendants, within the specified time period, that are pled in, or reasonably arise from the facts alleged in the complaints, including Labor Code claims for wages, commissions, overtime, meal and rest period premiums, unpaid expenses, failure to properly calculate the regular rate of pay, damages, unpaid costs, penalties (including late payment penalties), liquidated damages, punitive damages, interest, attorneys fees, litigation expenses, restitution, or equitable relief; claims under the California Unfair Competition Law; claims under PAGA; claims under the FLSA, though FLSA claims will only be released by those class members who sign a settlement check. The full language of the release is available and in the fully-executed settlement agreement. FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING 27. When will the Court consider whether to finally approve the settlement? The Court will hold a hearing in Department 17 of the Superior Court of California in and for the County of Alameda, located at 1221 Oak Street, Oakland, California, on September 27, 2017 at 2:30 p.m., to decide whether to finally approve the Settlement. At that time, the Court will also decide whether to approve Class Counsel s request for attorneys fees and reimbursement of costs, and the Class Representatives service awards. It is not necessary for you to appear at this hearing. If you have timely submitted an objection to the Settlement and a notice of intent to appear, you may appear at the hearing Page 8 of 10

9 to argue your objection to the Court. Any attorney who will represent you must file a notice of appearance with the Court and serve the notice of appearance on Class Counsel and counsel for Defendants, on or before September 20, 2017 (one week before the hearing). You will be solely responsible for the fees and costs of your own attorney. The Final Settlement Approval hearing may be postponed without further notice to the Class. Check back on the settlement website for details. If the settlement is not approved, the lawsuit will continue to be prepared for trial or other judicial resolution. 28. How do I get more information? FURTHER INFORMATION This Notice provides a summary of the basic terms of the settlement. For the precise terms and conditions of the settlement, you should review the detailed Settlement Agreement which is available on the settlement website ( For a small fee, all the pleadings and other records in this litigation, including the Settlement Agreement, may be examined online on the Alameda County Superior Court s website, known as DomainWeb, at After arriving at the website, click the Search By Case Number link, then enter JCCP as the case number and click SEARCH. Images of every document filed in the case may be viewed (for a charge) through the Register of Actions. You may also view images of every document filed in the case free of charge by using one of the computer terminal kiosks available at each court location that has a facility for civil filings. In addition, court-filed settlement documents can be obtained by contacting Plaintiff/Class Counsel: CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP Jonathan E. Gertler Samuel P. Cheadle 42 Miller Avenue Mill Valley, California Tel: (415) Fax: (415) KALUDI INSDORF LAW GROUP Ike Kaludi 828 San Pablo Ave. Suite 109 Albany, CA Tel: (415) Fax: (415) JUSTICE LAW CORPORATION Douglas Han 411 N. Central Ave., Suite 500 Glendale, CA Tel: (818) Fax: (818) LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, PC Edwin Aiwazian 410 Arden Ave, Suite 203 Glendale, CA Tel: (818) Fax: (818) Page 9 of 10

10 ALL INQUIRIES REGARDING THIS LITIGATION SHOULD BE MADE TO THE SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR OR CLASS COUNSEL. PLEASE DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT OR THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THIS SETTLEMENT. BY ORDER OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Page 10 of 10

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A To: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Antoine Turnage v. Joerns LLC, et al., Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG16808099 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Perez, et al. v. Centinela Feed, Inc. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC575341 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY To: A California

More information

- 1 - Questions? Call:

- 1 - Questions? Call: Patrick Sinay, et al. v. Essendant Co., et al. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC651043 ATTENTION: ALL CURRENT AND FORMER HOURLY-PAID OR NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES

More information

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Daniel L. Warshaw (SBN 185365) Bobby Pouya (SBN 245527) PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Tel: (818)

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMY WOODS, JOSHUA FROST, JORDAN KNOWLES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: Salazar v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Pending before the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles Case No. BC556145 If you worked for Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ( Sedgwick

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JAVIER PEREZ, as an individual and

More information

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods;

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods; SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA TYRONE WINDHAM, TERRY COLLINS, and TIMOTHY DAVIS, et al. V. T.F. LOUDERBACK, INC. dba BAY AREA BEVERAGE COMPANY, ET AL. - CASE NO. MSC16-00861

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO If You Are or Were a Non-Exempt Employee of Gale Pacific USA, Inc., or Worked for Gale Pacific USA, Inc. as a Temporary Worker,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA If you worked for Interstate Distributor Company and held the position title Local Hourly Driver for any period of time from November

More information

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET... NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING Frank Ortegon-Ramirez v. Cedar Fair, L.P., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (CASE NO. 1-13-CV-254098)

More information

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix Corp., et al United

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CPT ID SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALL PERSONS WHO WORKED FOR DEFENDANT ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL

More information

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY!

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY! SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY! YOU ARE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT UNDER THIS SETTLEMENT IF YOU WORKED FOR COIT SERVICES, INC. (dba

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA JULIUS DENNIS V. PLANETECHS, LLC PABLO LINN V. PLANETECHS, LLC GREGORY TATUM V. PLANETECHS, LLC CASE NOS. 15CV000787, RG16799430 and 16CV00363

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION BARRETT v. FOREST SETTLEMENT c/o RG/2 Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479 (866) 742-4955 ,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC CPT ID: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC1305688

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

More information

themselves and all others similarly situated, complain and allege as follows: INTRODUCTION

themselves and all others similarly situated, complain and allege as follows: INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Greg McGrath, Timothy Bludworth, and Elias Ruiz ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, complain and allege as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a class action

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Case No. RG06254835) A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However,

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: This is a court-authorized website notice of a proposed settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding background reports that Costco Wholesale Corporation obtained on certain job applicants. Payments

More information

Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

Superior Court of California, County of Alameda Superior Court of California, County of Alameda If You Lived in an Apartment or Townhome at the 1440 Mowry Avenue Apartment Complex Known as the Royal Pines Apartments and Townhomes in Fremont, California

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:17-cv JSM-AEP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:17-cv JSM-AEP ELAYNE FIGUEROA, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:17-cv-01780-JSM-AEP

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued. NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION LAWSUIT Brown, et al. v. Health Resource Solutions, Inc., et al. Case No. 16-cv-10667, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

More information

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana If you are or were a contractor for FedEx Ground, a class action settlement may affect your rights. Margaret Gibson, et al. v. FedEx Ground

More information

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. ("LA QUINTA") YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. (LA QUINTA) YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Sergio Peralta, et al. v. LQ Management L.L.C, et al. United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 3:14-cv-01027-DMS-JLB ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING UNSOLICITED FASCIMILE ADVERTISEMENTS The Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana If you are or were a contractor for FedEx Ground, a class action settlement may affect your rights. Gary Lee Larson, et al., v. FedEx Ground

More information

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Emily Hunt v. VEP Healthcare, Inc. Case No. 16-cv-04790 A court authorized this notice.

More information

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ( NOTICE ) Mark Thompson v. Professional Courier & Newspaper Distribution, Inc., et al. Case No. BC568018 600 South Commonwealth Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90005 If you are

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Rodriguez v. El Toro Medical Investors Settlement Administrator PO Box. 404041 ETZ «Barcode» Postal Service: Please do not mark barcode Claim#: ETZ-«Claim8»-«CkDig» «First1» «Last1» «Addr1» «Addr2» «City»,

More information

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS The Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re TERAYON COMMUNICATION ) Master File No. C-00-1967-MHP SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CLASS ACTION ) This Document Relates To:

More information

As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement.

As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Richard Terry v. Hoovestol, Inc. Case No. 3:16-cv-05183-JST A court authorized this notice. This is

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS JOHN STELL and CHARLES WILLIAMS, ) JR., on behalf of themselves individually ) and as class representatives on

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. United States District Court, Central District of California Case No. 2:14-cv-04378 (RGk) SHx THIS NOTICE

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re INTERMUNE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-03-2954-SI CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union

Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. THIS NOTICE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RUBEN AMAYA; individually, an on behalf of other members of the

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION Ryan DeKeyser, et al. v. Waupaca Foundry, Inc., f/k/a ThyssenKrupp Waupaca, Inc., Case No. 1:08-cv-00488-WCG Jason VanHoose,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully. If you received treatment through a Swedish Health Services Emergency Department and were uninsured, you could be entitled to benefits under a class action settlement. The King County Superior Court authorized

More information

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X ANTHONY CAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement IF YOU WORKED FOR BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS A DEDICATED SERVICE DIRECTOR, TREASURY SERVICES

More information

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT EXHIBIT 1 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement ( Settlement Agreement ) is reached by and between Plaintiff Sonia Razon ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all members of the

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ROBERT COHEN and ASHLEY BELTRAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES,

More information

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

If You Own or Owned a John Hancock Flex V Life Insurance Policy, a Class Action Lawsuit May Affect Your Rights.

If You Own or Owned a John Hancock Flex V Life Insurance Policy, a Class Action Lawsuit May Affect Your Rights. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA If You Own or Owned a John Hancock Flex V Life Insurance Policy, a Class Action Lawsuit May Affect Your Rights. A COURT AUTHORIZED

More information

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD If you made a purchase at a Godiva store in the United States

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION CONCERNING SEVERANCE CLAIMS The United States Bankruptcy Court for

More information

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN

More information

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN GIDDIENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Case No. 12-cv-02624-LDD CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE

More information

Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you have or had a residential purchase or refinance mortgage loan owned and/or serviced by Chase and Chase, directly or indirectly,

More information

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date: IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A proposed Settlement has been reached in a class action alleging that HD Supply, Inc. ( HDS or Defendant ) sent marketing

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PATRICK BIGNARDI and AARON BARRETT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, FLEXTRONICS AMERICA LLC; and DOES

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION Ryan DeKeyser, et al. v. Waupaca Foundry Inc., f/k/a ThyssenKrupp Waupaca, Inc. Case No. 1:08-cv-00488-WCG NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

More information

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING ACCOUNT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. CASE NO. 8:17-cv SDM-JSS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. CASE NO. 8:17-cv SDM-JSS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION CASE NO. 8:17-cv-00118-SDM-JSS LUIS A. VALDIVIESO, v. Plaintiff, CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC., Defendant. / NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA WILD RIDES INTERNET CAFE, LLC, and CLIMATE MASTERS HEATING & COOLING, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, WASTE INDUSTRIES, LLC, Defendant. Case No.: 17 CV 756-1

More information

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING

More information

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 1:15-cv-24326-CMA If you made a purchase at a Microsoft retail store using a credit card

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HARLEY SEEGERT v. Case No. 37-2017-00016131-CU-MC-CTL P.F. CHANG S CHINA BISTRO, INC., et al. TO: NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT United States District Court, Central District, Southern Division Pamela Carter, et al. v. San Pasqual Fiduciary Trust Company, et al. Case No. SACV15-1507 JVS (JCGx) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Harris v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Case No.:4:06-cv-00175-KGB If You Are or

More information

United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. United States District Court for the District of Columbia If You Received a Debit Card Issued by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for Your Service as a Juror or Fact Witness, You May Be Eligible for a Payment

More information

If you are or were employed by 15 Main LLC (dba Calavera ), a class action lawsuit may affect your rights.

If you are or were employed by 15 Main LLC (dba Calavera ), a class action lawsuit may affect your rights. ESTE PAQUETE CONTIENE EL AVISO EN ESPAÑOL SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA If you are or were employed by 15 Main LLC (dba Calavera ), a class action lawsuit may affect your rights. The court

More information

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 29229 Canwood

More information

If you were a Jamestown distributor in North Carolina at any time since September 12, 2010, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If you were a Jamestown distributor in North Carolina at any time since September 12, 2010, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA If you were a Jamestown distributor in North Carolina at any time since September 12, 2010, you could get a payment from a class

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS Oscar Torres and Anthony Quintana, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, vs. Plaintiffs, Salinas Farm Labor

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Superior Court for the State of Connecticut Judicial District of Hartford If you were a customer of Starion Energy s variable rate electricity supply services you could receive a cash payment from a class

More information

IF YOU PAID A CONVENIENCE FEE WHEN MAKING A MORTGAGE PAYMENT TO NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

IF YOU PAID A CONVENIENCE FEE WHEN MAKING A MORTGAGE PAYMENT TO NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Garcia v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-01808 TSZ IF YOU PAID A CONVENIENCE FEE WHEN MAKING A MORTGAGE PAYMENT TO NATIONSTAR

More information

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Audino,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. CGC CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. CGC CLASS ACTION In re KING DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT plc SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. TO: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Lead Case No. CGC-15-544770 CLASS

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT [CLASS ACTION]

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT [CLASS ACTION] 0 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT W. SKRIPKO, JR., APLC Robert W. Skripko, Jr. (SEN ) N. Broadway, nd Floor Santa Ana, California 0 Tel: () -00; Fax: () -0 DENIS & RASI, PC PaulJ. Denis (SEN 0) Ethan E. Rasi (SEN:

More information

OBJECT NO LATER THAN JULY 5, 2016 GO TO A HEARING DO NOTHING

OBJECT NO LATER THAN JULY 5, 2016 GO TO A HEARING DO NOTHING NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you purchased Violin Memory, Inc. common stock between September 27, 2013 and November 21, 2013, you could receive a payment from a class action settlement.

More information

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT Bias v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00664-YGR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Para ver este aviso en español, se puede visitar www.biasvwellsfargo.com. IF YOU HAVE OR HAD

More information

YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY United States District Court for the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION X AMIT PATEL, on behalf of himself and all others

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID»

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» American Casino Recording Class Action c/o Dahl Administration LLC P.O Box 3614 Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614 *«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» UNIQUE ID:

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS United States District Court for the Eastern District of California If You Purchased Certain Zicam Products, You May Be Eligible to Receive a Payment as Part of a Proposed Class Action Settlement A federal

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE If you purchased Dial Complete Liquid Hand Soap in the United States Between January 1, 2001 and January 2, 2019. You May be Eligible to Receive

More information

Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018

Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018 Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA Case :-cv-000-bro-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. cbaker@bakerlp.com MIKE CURTIS, State Bar No. mcurtis@bakerlp.com BAKER & SCHWARTZ, P.C. Montgomery Street, Suite

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Have you purchased and used Align probiotic supplements, but received no digestive relief or other digestive benefit? If so, you may be entitled to

More information

If You Purchased Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed, You May Be Eligible to Get $15 Or More Per Package from a Class Action Settlement

If You Purchased Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed, You May Be Eligible to Get $15 Or More Per Package from a Class Action Settlement United States District Court for the Southern District of New York In re Scotts EZ Seed Litigation, Case No. 7:12-cv-4727 (VB) (PED) If You Purchased Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed, You May Be Eligible to

More information