PLEASE READ THIS CLASS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED BY IT.

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PLEASE READ THIS CLASS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED BY IT."

Transcription

1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Mata et al. v. Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, Case No. 5:14-cv As a current or former non-exempt associate of Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, Manpower, Inc., ManpowerGroup, Inc., or ManpowerGroup US Inc. in California, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement. The United States District Court, Northern District of California authorized this Class Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU ARE A CURRENT OR FORMER ASSOCIATE WHO WORKED FOR MANPOWER, INC./CALIFORNIA PENINSULA AFTER APRIL 12, 2009 OR FOR MANPOWER INC., MANPOWERGROUP INC., OR MANPOWERGROUP US INC. AFTER FEBRUARY 13, 2009, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 8, A proposed settlement of $2,900,000 (the Total Settlement Amount ) will be used to pay claims to: All current and former non-exempt, hourly associates who worked for Defendant Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula from April 12, 2009 through September 8, 2016 and all current and former non-exempt, hourly associates who worked for Defendants Manpower Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc., and ManpowerGroup US Inc. from February 13, 2009 through September 8, Notwithstanding the foregoing, any person who performed work and/or suffered violations of any law occurring while such person was in the employ of either Manpower US Inc. and/or CPM LTD d/b/a Manpower of San Diego and Manpower Temporary Services shall not be considered a Class Member with respect to such employment. The settlement resolves two lawsuits. The first lawsuit is entitled Mata et al. v. Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, Case No. 5:14-cv (the Lawsuit ). The second is entitled Padilla v. Willner ( Willner II ), No. 15-cv This settlement resolves whether Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, Manpower Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc., and ManpowerGroup US Inc. (collectively Manpower ) properly paid associates for all hours worked and other legal consequences that would follow from not doing so, including penalties under the Labor Code for failure to furnish accurate wage statements. This settlement avoids the costs and risks from continuing the Lawsuit, pays money to persons like you, and releases Manpower from alleged liability. The Court has not made a determination of the validity of the claims in the Lawsuit. Manpower denies any and all liability arising from any of the claims and contends that at all relevant times they properly compensated all associates and fully complied with all applicable laws. Class Members will receive a base payment $12.50 in addition to a pro-rata payment based on the number of wage statements received during the Class Period. PLEASE READ THIS CLASS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED BY IT. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING Receive a payment and give up your legal rights to pursue claims released by the settlement of the Lawsuit. OPT OUT Receive no payment and retain your legal rights to pursue claims that would otherwise be released by the settlement of the Lawsuit. OBJECT If you do not opt out, you may object to the settlement by filling out the objection form and mailing the form to the Settlement Administrator, CPT Group, Inc., as described under Question 13. The court will consider timely objections. CLASS NOTICE - PAGE 1 OF 8

2 ATTEND A HEARING The Court will hold a hearing on May 11, 2017 at 1:30 PM to determine whether the settlement is fair, as discussed in Question 14 below. You may attend the hearing, but you are not required to attend. If you timely fill out and mail the objection form, and if you also want to speak about your objection, you should send a letter to the Settlement Administrator, CPT Group, giving notice of your intention to appear and speak at the hearing. 1. Why did I get this Class Notice? IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT You were sent this Class Notice because you have a right to know about the proposed settlement in the Lawsuit and about all of your options before the Court rules whether to finally approve the settlement. If the Court approves the settlement and after any objections and appeals are resolved, a Settlement Administrator appointed by the Court will make the payments that the settlement allows. This Class Notice explains the Lawsuit, the proposed settlement, your legal rights, and what benefits are available and how to receive them. The Court in charge of this case is the United States District Court, Northern District of California. The persons who sued are called Plaintiffs and the organizations they sued are called Defendants. 2. What is the Lawsuit about? Claudia Padilla and Lesli Guido, the Representative Plaintiffs, in the Lawsuit alleged multiple violations of the California Labor Code, the California Business and Professions Code, and the California Private Attorneys General Act, including causes of action for: (1) failure to pay reporting time pay; (2) failure and refusal to pay agreed wages; (3) failure to pay wages due and payable after demand has been made; (4) failure to pay minimum wages; (5) knowing and intentional failure to comply with itemized employee wage statement provisions; (6) failure to pay wages timely; and (7) failure to pay all wages upon termination. 3. Why is there a settlement? The parties disagree on the probable outcome of the case with respect to liability, damages, and how much money could be recovered if the Representative Plaintiffs won at trial. Manpower believes that the Representative Plaintiffs would not prevail if this case went to trial. The Court has not decided in favor of the Representative Plaintiffs or Manpower. There has been no trial in this case. Instead, both sides recognize the risks, expenses, and disruption that are associated with continued litigation and they have therefore chosen to resolve their differences by entering into a settlement. By doing so, the parties can avoid the cost of a trial, yet Class Members are still entitled to receive payments. The parties entered into this settlement after arms-length negotiations while using the services of an experienced and neutral mediator. The Representative Plaintiffs and Class Counsel believe that the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and is in the best interest of the Class Members. 4. What is a class action settlement? The Court must approve the terms of the proposed settlement as fair and reasonable. Once approved, the settlement will affect all Class Members except those who have properly opted out. This Class Notice explains your legal rights, the terms of the settlement, what you must do to participate, and the amount of money you may receive. Please read this entire Class Notice carefully. 5. What should I do? You can do nothing, and if you are entitled to a payment, you will be paid. Be mindful, however, that if this Class Notice reaches you and the address where you now live is different, you need to contact the Settlement Administrator and provide updated information so that any future correspondence or the settlement check itself reaches you and is not returned as an address unknown. CLASS NOTICE - PAGE 2 OF 8

3 6. How much will my payment be? After all fees, costs, and offsets are taken as set forth under paragraph 24 of the parties Joint Stipulation of Class Settlement (which is available for review at the Settlement Administrator s website the remainder will be used to pay Class Members a base payment $12.50 in addition to a pro-rata payment based on the number of wage statements received during the Class Period. If you do not dispute your wage statement calculation and do not opt out of the settlement, you will be bound by the settlement and receive a settlement payment. In other words, you do not need to take any action to receive a settlement payment. 7. When would I get my payment? The Court will hold a hearing on May 11, 2017 at 1:30 PM to decide whether to approve the proposed settlement. If the Court approves the settlement and anyone objects, there may be appeals. It is always uncertain when these objections and appeals can be resolved, and resolving them can take time. To check on the progress of the settlement, call the Settlement Administrator at , or contact Class Counsel (see below for Class Counsel s contact information.). Please be patient. 8. What am I releasing? Upon final approval by the Court of the settlement, and except as to such rights or claims as may be created by the settlement, Plaintiffs and Class Members who have not effectively opted-out of the settlement as described below fully release and discharge Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, Manpower Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc., and ManpowerGroup US Inc. and any parent, subsidiary, affiliate, predecessor or successor, and all agents, employees, officers, directors, insurers, and attorneys thereof (sometimes hereinafter referred to as Releasees ) from any and all claims, debts, liabilities, demands, obligations, guarantees, costs, expenses, attorney fees, penalties, damages, action or causes of action contingent or accrued for, which arise out of the allegations and claims asserted in the operative complaint in the Action ( Released Claims ). Released Claims shall expressly exclude claims for unemployment compensation, disability, workers compensation, discrimination, retaliation, other claims unrelated to the claims set forth in the Lawsuit. The time period covered by this release is April 12, 2009 through September 8, 2016 for Defendant Manpower Inc./California Peninsula and February 13, 2009 through September 8, 2016 for Defendants Manpower Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc., and ManpowerGroup US Inc. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in the settlement releases any claim by any person based upon work performed and/or violations of any law occurring while such person was in the employ of either Manpower US Inc. and/or CPM LTD d/b/a Manpower of San Diego and Manpower Temporary Services, neither of which shall be considered a Releasee under this Joint Stipulation. Class Members will release all known and unknown claims against Manpower pursuant to California Civil Code section 1542 that have been alleged or could have been alleged arising out of the facts, circumstances, causes of action, and primary rights alleged in the Lawsuit. The class claims will be dismissed with prejudice following final approval of settlement by the Court. 9. How does this settlement affect other Manpower-related class action lawsuits that may apply to me? There are other class action lawsuits pending against Manpower entities and those who participate in this settlement may also be putative class members in the other lawsuits. The effects of this settlement on claims in other lawsuits are discussed below. THE EXPLANATIONS SET FORTH BELOW EXPRESS THE VIEWPOINT OF BOTH PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND DEFENDANTS COUNSEL, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE DISCUSSIONS OF THE SANCHEZ AND ZEMUDIO CASES. BECAUSE DEFENDANTS ARE NOT PARTIES TO THE SANCHEZ AND ZEMUDIO CASES, THEY EXPRESS NO OPINION WITH REGARD TO THE ACCURACY OF THE SANCHEZ AND ZEMUDIO DISCUSSIONS, WHICH EXPRESS THE OPINION OF PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL ALONE. RAMIREZ I (RAMIREZ V. MANPOWER, INC., MONTEREY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. M121885) AND RAMIREZ II (RAMIREZ V. MANPOWER, INC./CALIFORNIA PENINSULA, MONTEREY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. M122728) CLASS NOTICE - PAGE 3 OF 8

4 Ramirez I and Ramirez II were class action lawsuits alleging the same claims as the claims asserted in this action: Mata, et al v. Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, et al., United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 5:14-cv LHK ( Action ). Ramirez I was filed against Manpower Inc. and Ramirez II was filed about eight weeks later against Manpower Inc./California Peninsula ( MICP ) after it was discovered that MICP had been incorporated separately from Manpower Inc. The cases were ultimately removed to federal court and consolidated into a single case: Ramirez v. Manpower, Inc., United State District Court, Northern District of California Case, No. 5:13-cv EJD. Patricia Ramirez, the class representative in the consolidated Ramirez cases, filed for bankruptcy protection and received a discharge while the cases were pending. Because she neglected to comply with bankruptcy rules requiring her to disclose these lawsuits in her bankruptcy proceeding she lost the ability to continue with the consolidated Ramirez cases. The cases were therefore terminated by the court. Upon learning that Ms. Ramirez had completed a bankruptcy proceeding without disclosing her interest in the consolidated Ramirez cases, her attorneys prepared for the eventual termination of the Ramirez cases by filing this Action, which asserts the same claims as those alleged in the consolidated Ramirez cases. Those who are class members under the Mata settlement also would have been class members in the consolidated Ramirez cases. The Ramirez cases and this Action do not have a negative effect on one another. The importance of the Ramirez cases is that they allow some of the claims in this Action to incorporate the time periods covered by the Ramirez cases. Because of the similarities between the claims asserted in this Action and those asserted in the Ramirez cases, the Mata Plaintiffs were allowed to calculate the time periods for which claims could be included in the lawsuit by counting backward from the date the Ramirez cases were filed, thereby allowing the Mata Plaintiffs to include approximately 15 more months in their claim periods than would have normally been allowed. Bottom Line Effect of this Settlement on the Claims in the Ramirez I case: This settlement will have no negative effect on claims in Ramirez I. WILLNER I (WILLNER V. MANPOWER INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT, CASE NO. 11-CV-2846-JST) AND WILLNER II (PADILLA V. WILLNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT, CASE NO. 15-CV-4866-JST) Willner I was a class action against Manpower Inc. alleging, among other things, that the itemized wage statements Manpower Inc. provided to temporary workers did not identify the complete name and address of the employer and failed to list the beginning date of the pay period. Willner I also claimed that Manpower, Inc. was subject to penalties because it failed to deliver paychecks within the time required by law. Ruling on pretrial motions, the court agreed with the plaintiff in Willner I with regard to the wage statement claims, but disagreed with her regarding the timeliness of paychecks. The case ultimately settled. The settlement agreement that resolved Willner I gave rise to two disputes in this Action. The first dispute arose from the Mata Plaintiffs argument that the claims period in this Action should be enlarged to include the claims period at issue in Willner I, in the same way that the Mata claims periods were enlarged to include the periods covered by the Ramirez cases. The Court rejected the Mata Plaintiffs argument on this point. The second dispute arose from Defendants argument that the Willner I settlement agreement barred the Mata Plaintiffs claim for waiting time penalties under Labor Code section 203. The Court disagreed with Defendants argument. Consequently, Mata and Willner I had no positive or negative effect on each other. While the Mata Plaintiffs and Defendants were litigating the two disputes arising from the Willner I settlement agreement, the Mata Plaintiffs filed a special lawsuit claiming that the Willner I settlement agreement should be voided or modified to ensure that it would not negatively affect the claims in this Action. This lawsuit also asked the court to rule that the Willner I settlement class must include those class members in this Action who suffered the same types of errors in their wage statements as those which were the subject of the Willner I lawsuit. This special lawsuit challenging the Willner I settlement agreement is referred to as Willner II. The court ruled in Willner II that the plaintiffs were not entitled to void or modify the Willner I settlement and could not add any of the class members in this Action to the Willner I settlement. The Mata Plaintiffs filed an appeal challenging this ruling. The settlement in this Action has no effect on Willner I, as the Willner I settlement is final and will remain undisturbed under the terms of the Mata settlement. The Mata settlement will have a negative effect on Willner II, as it specifies that the appeal currently pending will be dismissed. By dismissing Willner II, the proposed agreement eliminates any possibility of the settlement in Willner I being reopened. CLASS NOTICE - PAGE 4 OF 8

5 Bottom Line Effect of this Settlement on the Claims in the Willner I case: This settlement will have no negative effect on claims in the Willner I case. In fact, this settlement will ensure that nothing about the Mata case will negatively impact the claims in Willner I. Bottom Line Effect of this Settlement on the Claims in the Willner II case: This settlement will negatively impact the claims in the Willner II case. It dismisses the appeal in Willner II, making the dismissal in Willner II permanent and irreversible. STIMPSON (STIMPSON V. MANPOWER US INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 3:15-CV GPC-JMA) Stimpson is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Though Manpower U.S. Inc. was originally a defendant in Stimpson, it has been dismissed and is no longer a party to the case. The only defendant in Stimpson is CPM LTD (d/b/a Manpower, Manpower of San Diego and Manpower Temporary Services), a Manpower franchisee. Stimpson alleges claims similar to those involved in this Action and covers much of the same time periods. But Stimpson and this Action have no effect on each other. The settlement class in this Action specifically excludes workers employed by Defendants franchisees and the language of the settlement agreement specifically excludes any application to Manpower franchisees. Since the only defendant being sued in Stimpson is a franchisee of Defendants, the Mata settlement will have no effect on claims being pursued in Stimpson. Bottom Line Effect of this Settlement on the Claims in the Stimpson case: This settlement will have no effect on the claims pending in Stimpson. SANCHEZ (SANCHEZ V. KEURIG GREEN MOUNTAIN, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:15-CV EJD) Sanchez is a class action lawsuit alleging that employees of Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. ( Keurig ) were not paid for time associated with mandatory pre-employment orientations and pre-employment performance tests. No Manpower entity has been named as a defendant in Sanchez. But, temporary service employees supplied by Manpower are excluded from Sanchez s proposed class. There is a motion currently pending that would eliminate Manpower CP employees from the class in the Sanchez case. The settlement in Mata will have no negative impact on the claims asserted in Sanchez because Mata class members are not members of the Sanchez class and because Keurig is not being released under the terms of the Mata settlement. Therefore, the Mata settlement will not reduce Keurig s liability to the class members in Sanchez. Bottom Line Effect of this Settlement on the Claims in the Sanchez case: This settlement will have no negative effect on the claims pending in Sanchez. RICO (RICO V. MANPOWER, INC./CALIFORNIA PENINSULA, MONTEREY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. M129042) Rico is a class action lawsuit alleging that Manpower employees assigned to work at Dole Food Company, Inc. s Camphora Road facility in Soledad, California were not paid for time spent donning and doffing required clothing and personal protective equipment before clocking in for their shifts and after clocking out from their shifts. The putative class members in Rico were members of the class in an earlier lawsuit entitled Zemudio v. Dole Food Company, Inc., Monterey County Superior Court, Case No. M ( Zemudio ). In Zemudio, meal period, rest period, and donning and doffing unpaid wage claims arising at Dole s Camphora Road facility in Soledad, California, were alleged against Dole. Zemudio also sought an award of waiting time penalties under Labor Code section 203. Rico was filed because it was believed that the separate time-keeping system used by Manpower employees resulted in a greater loss of wage to Manpower employees than was suffered by those directly employed by Dole, who used a different time system. Rico is intended to recover the difference for Manpower employees. The impact of the settlement in this Action is described in paragraph 40 below, which states in relevant part: The Parties acknowledge and agree that the settlement shall be effective as a full and final accord and satisfaction and settlement of, and as a bar to, each and every claim that has been alleged or could have been alleged against Defendants arising out of the facts, circumstances, causes of action, and primary rights alleged in the Action. But, the Parties acknowledge and agree that the donning and doffing claim in [Rico] [is] not being released as part of this settlement. However, the Parties further acknowledge and agree that they are not carving out any penalties derivative of the claims resolved in the Action. CLASS NOTICE - PAGE 5 OF 8

6 As Mata settles waiting time, wage statement and PAGA penalty claims, which are sought in Rico, those penalties cannot be recovered in Rico. With respect to such penalties, Plaintiffs counsel notes that the Rico class members already received one payment for such penalties as part of the Zemudio settlement and that amount was approved by the court as fair for the violations occurring at Dole s Camphora Road facility. The payment that will be made in Mata for waiting time, wage statement and PAGA penalties will be the second payment to Rico class members for such penalties. Bottom Line Effect of this Settlement on the Claims in the Rico case: This settlement will negatively affect the claims pending in Rico. While Rico class members may still recover unpaid wages, they may not recover penalties in the Rico case because those penalties are being settled in this case. MARTINEZ (MARTINEZ V. HARMONY FOODS (SANTA CRUZ SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. CV177053) Martinez is a class action lawsuit seeking penalties from Harmony Foods and Manpower for meal and rest period violations. Since no meal and rest period claims were alleged in the Mata lawsuit, the Mata settlement has no negative impact on those claims pending on Martinez. The impact of the settlement in this Action is described in paragraph 40 below, which states in relevant part: The Parties acknowledge and agree that the settlement shall be effective as a full and final accord and satisfaction and settlement of, and as a bar to, each and every claim that has been alleged or could have been alleged against Defendants arising out of the facts, circumstances, causes of action, and primary rights alleged in the Action. But, the Parties acknowledge and agree that the meal and rest period claims in Martinez are not being released as part of this settlement. However, the Parties further acknowledge and agree that they are not carving out any penalties derivative of the claims resolved in the Action. As Mata settles waiting time, wage statement, and PAGA penalty claims, which are sought in Martinez, those penalties cannot be recovered in Martinez. Bottom Line Effect of this Settlement on the Claims in the Martinez case: This settlement will negatively affect the claims pending in Martinez. While Martinez class members may still recover unpaid wages, they may not recover penalties because those penalties are being settled in this case. RELEVANT CLASS PERIODS The class periods in this Action are as follows: April 12, 2009 through September 8, 2016 for associates of Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, and from February 13, 2009 through September 8, 2016 for associates of Manpower Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc., and ManpowerGroup US Inc. The class periods in this Action are based on the filing date of Ramirez I and Ramirez II, and thus the class periods on this Action and the Ramirez cases are coextensive. The class period for Willner I was March 17, 2010 through January 20, As noted above, the Willner I court approved final settlement in that action on June 22, Willner II was filed on October 22, 2015 against Manpower Inc. and Vera Willner. The court granted the defendants separate motions to dismiss on March 7, The Willner II plaintiffs appealed the March 7, 2016 order, and the appeal is currently pending. However, as discussed above, Willner II would be resolved as part of this settlement. Martinez was filed on May 31, 2013, and the class period for that action is May 31, 2009 through judgment. Rico was filed on August 27, 2014, and the class period for that action is March August 27, 2010 through judgment. Sanchez was filed on July 14, 2015, and the class period for that action is July 14, 2011 through judgment. Stimpson was filed on March 12, 2015, and the class period for that action is March 12, 2011 through judgment. The class periods in this Action are inclusive of all the above-discussed case s class periods, with the exception of Zemudio (December 26, 2008 through May 31, 2014). However, Zemudio was resolved on March 6, 2016, when the Zemudio court approved settlement of all wage and hour claims involving the class members. That settlement is final and no appeal is pending. As such, there are no outstanding class periods. CLASS NOTICE - PAGE 6 OF 8

7 10. How can I opt out of this settlement? You can opt out of this settlement and retain your rights. To do so, you must prepare and submit in writing your signed and dated statement that you want to be excluded from the settlement. You will have 45 days from the date of mailing of this Class Notice to do so. Your written statement must be mailed to the Settlement Administrator, CPT Group, Inc., Aston, Irvine, California and be postmarked no later than April 13, 2017, or it will not be considered and you will be bound by the settlement. 11. Do I have a lawyer in this case? The Court has appointed B. James Fitzpatrick and Charles Swanston and FITZPATRICK, SPINI & SWANSTON, 555 S. Main Street, Salinas, California 93901, telephone (831) , and Patrick D. Toole and WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC, 265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310, Fresno, California 93720, telephone (559) , to represent you and other Class Members in the Lawsuit. These lawyers are called Class Counsel. They will be compensated from the Total Settlement Amount as discussed in this Class Notice. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 12. How will the lawyers be paid? Class Counsel will ask the Court to award them fees up to 25% of the Total Settlement Amount. Class Counsel will also ask the Court to award them costs incurred in connection with the Lawsuit. The Court may choose to award less than the amount requested by Class Counsel. 13. How do I tell the Court that I do not like the settlement? You can ask the Court to deny approval of the proposed settlement by mailing an objection to the Class Administrator. If the Court denies approval of the proposed settlement, no settlement payments will be sent out pursuant to this Settlement Agreement, and the lawsuit will continue until it is resolved either through settlement, trial, or a judgment issued by the Court. If that is what you want to happen, you must object. Any objection must (a) clearly identify the case name and number (Mata et al. v. Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, Case No. 5:14-cv-03787), (b) be submitted to the Court by mailing them to the CPT Group Inc., located at Aston Street, Irvine, CA 92606, and (c) must be postmarked on or before April 13, Please use the Objection Form attached to this Proposed Notice if you wish to file an objection. To exclude yourself from the settlement, you must opt out of the settlement and follow the directions described above in Question 10. Please note that you cannot both object to the settlement and exclude yourself. You may also appear at the Final Approval hearing, either in person or through your own attorney. If you appear through your own attorney, you are responsible for paying that attorney. You are not required to appear at the Final Approval Hearing. 14. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the settlement? The Court will hold a fairness hearing May 11, 2017 at 1:30 PM at the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Courtroom 8, located at 280 S 1st St, San Jose, California At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court will consider all timely written objections. The Court will listen to people who have asked to speak at the hearing. The Court may also decide how much to pay to Class Counsel. At or after the hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the settlement. We do not know how long this decision will take. 15. Do I have to come to the hearing? No. Class Counsel will answer any questions that the Court may have. But, you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you sent an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not required. CLASS NOTICE - PAGE 7 OF 8

8 16. May I speak at the hearing? You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the fairness hearing. To do so, you must send a letter stating that it is your Notice of Intention to Appear in the settlement. Be sure to include your name, address, and telephone number. Your Notice of Intention to Appear must be postmarked no later than April 13, 2017, and be sent to the Settlement Administrator, CPT Group, Inc., located at Aston Street, Irvine, CA What happens if I do nothing at all? You will participate in the settlement. You will be bound by the release as set forth herein. The Class Members shall have 180 calendar days to cash their settlement checks. Checks allocated to Class Members who cannot be located during the notice process shall be cancelled by the Claims Administrator and promptly place the funds in a Reserve Fund to be used to pay amounts allocated to Class Members who cannot be located within the time provided, but who are later located up to six months after the Effective Date, and who are otherwise qualified for such payment. All payments made from the Reserve Fund shall be made as soon as practicable after the Class Members are located. Any funds remaining in the Reserve Fund after six months and any remaining funds from uncashed checks shall be distributed to the California Department of Industrial Relations. GETTING MORE INFORMATION This Class Notice summarizes the proposed settlement. All questions and comments regarding this settlement should be directed to Class Counsel and the Settlement Administrator. The Settlement Administrator has setup a website which has links to this Class Notice and other documents related to the proposed settlement, including the Joint Stipulation of Class Settlement. The website is: You may call or contact Class Counsel or the Settlement Administrator if you would like more information about the case. You may call or write the Settlement Administrator, CPT Group, Inc., located at Aston, Irvine, California You may call or write to Class Counsel, Fitzpatrick, Spini & Swanston, located at 555 S. Main Street, Salinas, California You may call or write to Class Counsel, Wanger Jones Helsley PC, located at 265 E. River Park Cir., Suite 310, Fresno, California To review any additional case documents not available on the Settlement Administrator s website, you may also access the Court's Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system at or by visiting the office of the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, located at 280 S 1st St, San Jose, California 95113, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Court holidays. PLEASE DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT OR THE COURT CLERK'S OFFICE TO INQUIRE ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT OR THE CLAIM PROCESS. CLASS NOTICE - PAGE 8 OF 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET... NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING Frank Ortegon-Ramirez v. Cedar Fair, L.P., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (CASE NO. 1-13-CV-254098)

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA JULIUS DENNIS V. PLANETECHS, LLC PABLO LINN V. PLANETECHS, LLC GREGORY TATUM V. PLANETECHS, LLC CASE NOS. 15CV000787, RG16799430 and 16CV00363

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect

More information

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case4:13-cv-02132-YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM

More information

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS The Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS JOHN STELL and CHARLES WILLIAMS, ) JR., on behalf of themselves individually ) and as class representatives on

More information

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit

More information

Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully.

Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC CPT ID: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC1305688

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: Salazar v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Pending before the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles Case No. BC556145 If you worked for Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ( Sedgwick

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE FREMONT GENERAL CORPORATION LITIGATION Case No.: CV07-02693 JHN(FFMX) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Case No. RG06254835) A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIRENA TORRES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 1:16-cv-01915-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. PICK-A-PART AUTO

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JEROME JENSON, BETTY TAIT, EILEEN HORTON and JOSEPH RISSE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you purchased goods or services using a credit card from a Lowe s store in Massachusetts

More information

NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING CLASS

NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING CLASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT In re Enron Corporation ERISA Litigation ) No. H-01-3913 (Consolidated Cases) ) ) TO ALL MEMBERS

More information

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING UNSOLICITED FASCIMILE ADVERTISEMENTS The Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE HIBERNIA FOODS, PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------------- THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT POPTECH, L.P., individually, and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 310-cv-967 (SRU) v. STEWARDSHIP

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Jeffrey Spencer, Esq. Spencer Law Firm 0 Calle Amanecer, Suite 0 San Clemente, California Telephone:.0. Facsimile:.0.1 jps@spencerlaw.net Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. Lakeshore Law Center Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN GIDDIENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Case No. 12-cv-02624-LDD CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE

More information

If you bought Aggrenox directly from Boehringer Ingelheim you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If you bought Aggrenox directly from Boehringer Ingelheim you could get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT If you bought Aggrenox directly from Boehringer Ingelheim you could get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court authorized

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SUMMARY OF ATTACHED NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you obtained a Second Mortgage Loan on your Missouri home from Preferred

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA If You Received a Letter from the Law Firm of Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP Dated between October 23, 2009 and October 22,

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NICOLE COGDELL, et al., ) ) Case No. SACV 12-01138 AG (ANx) Plaintiffs, ) ) Honorable Andrew J. Guilford v. ) ) THE WET SEAL,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information

A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : :

A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : : A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANGELA FULLER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v.

More information

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event

More information

This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Attention Purchasers of RUST-OLEUM Painter s Touch Ultra Cover 2X spray paint, RUST-OLEUM Painter's Touch 2X Ultra Cover spray paint, RUST-OLEUM PaintPlus Ultra Cover 2X spray paint, RUST-OLEUM American

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you purchased goods using a credit card from a Sur La Table store in California during the period of time between February

More information

Case 2:13-cv GHK-MRW Document Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311. Exhibit A. EXHIBIT A Page 46

Case 2:13-cv GHK-MRW Document Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311. Exhibit A. EXHIBIT A Page 46 Case 2:13-cv-04460-GHK-MRW Document 302-1 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:8311 Exhibit A EXHIBIT A Page 46 Case 2:13-cv-04460-GHK-MRW Document 302-1 Filed 02/08/16 Page 2 of 47 Page ID #:8312 CLAIM

More information

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-01052-GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dorothy R. Konicki, for herself and class members, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement The original Interstate Batteries Class Action Settlement has been amended, and the Court

More information

Instructions on filing a claim:

Instructions on filing a claim: Cricket Wireless Consumer Demand for Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION SUPPLEMENTARY PROCEDURES FOR CONSUMER-RELATED DISPUTES Instructions on filing

More information

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT Bias v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00664-YGR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Para ver este aviso en español, se puede visitar www.biasvwellsfargo.com. IF YOU HAVE OR HAD

More information

Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action

Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action If You Performed at any Deja Vu-Affiliated Nightclub as an Exotic Dancer, a Proposed Class Action

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/ :28 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/ :28 PM FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/2016 08:28 PM INDEX NO. 103948/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2016 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT A SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT RICHARD TYNER, III, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, EMBARQ CORPORATION, THOMAS A. GERKE, WILLIAM

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P. Case No.: 2014 CA

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS If you received an automated call to your cell phone and were transferred to a State Farm Agent between January

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Have you purchased and used Align probiotic supplements, but received no digestive relief or other digestive benefit? If so, you may be entitled to

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Did you own property near and downwind from the former Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant (in Jefferson County, northwest of Denver, Colorado) on

More information

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA CHARLES GLASS, and ) RONNIE JENNINGS, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) CV 2014-900163 BLACK WARRIOR ELECTRIC ) MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, ) Defendant. ) NOTICE OF CLASS

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Superior Court for the State of Connecticut Judicial District of Hartford If you were a customer of Starion Energy s variable rate electricity supply services you could receive a cash payment from a class

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you purchased or otherwise acquired Corinthian Colleges, Inc. ( Corinthian ) common stock between August 23, 2010 and April 14, 2015 (both dates inclusive)

More information

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID P. ANASTASI, et al., Lead Case No. 08-2-31902-4 SEA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. TO ALL customers of

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF COURT

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF COURT LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF COURT If, at Any Time Between December 31, 2010 and August 17, 2017, You Received One or More Text Messages from Uber Technologies, Inc., You May Be Eligible for a Payment from

More information

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court authorized this

More information

Getty Realty Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Getty Realty Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) Section 1: 8-K (FORM 8-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If You Played NCAA Division I Men s or Women s Basketball or FBS Football

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

If You Purchased a Power Pressure Cooker between March 1, 2013 and January 19, 2018, You Could Get Benefits from a Proposed Class Action Settlement

If You Purchased a Power Pressure Cooker between March 1, 2013 and January 19, 2018, You Could Get Benefits from a Proposed Class Action Settlement IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Kenneth Chapman, et. al. v Tristar Products, Inc., Case No. 1:16CV01114 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If You Purchased a Power Pressure

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE ALLERGAN, INC. PROXY VIOLATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 8:14-cv-2004-DOC (KES) CLASS ACTION Honorable David O.

More information

If you received a call on your cell phone from NCO Financial Systems about a debt, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call on your cell phone from NCO Financial Systems about a debt, a class action settlement may affect your rights. CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION Thornton v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc., Case No. 16 CH 5780 If you received a call on your cell phone from NCO Financial Systems

More information

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action IF YOU WERE CHARGED A FUEL SURCHARGE OR FUEL/ENVIRONMENTAL FEE IN FLORIDA BY SOUTHERN WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC D/B/A SUN DISPOSAL ( SWS ) FROM 01/14/12

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE CAST IRON SOIL PIPE AND FITTINGS ANTITRUST LITIGATION 1:14-md-2508-HMS-CHS THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Courtroom 15B (Annex) THIS LEGAL NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Courtroom 15B (Annex) THIS LEGAL NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PERRY JOHNSON and LAYNE BUTLER, on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and themselves individually, v. Plaintiffs, ASHLEY FURNITURE

More information

A federal court authorized this Notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this Notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If you purchased and paid for brand Adderall XR any time from January 1, 2007 to April 11, 2016, your rights may be affected and you could

More information

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD If you made a purchase at a Godiva store in the United States

More information

In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV TPG-HBP

In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV TPG-HBP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Altair Nanotechnologies Shareholder Derivative Litigation CASE NO.: 14-CV-09418-TPG-HBP AMENDED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF ALTAIR

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (UNLIMITED JURISDICTION)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (UNLIMITED JURISDICTION) Steven C. Wolan (State Bar No. ) Andrea S. Carlise (State Bar No. ) Clariza C. Garcia (State Bar No. ) PATTON WOLAN CARLISE, LLP Harrison Street, Suite 0 Oakland, CA 1- Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: ()

More information

Case 2:15-cv GHK-KS Document 37-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:262 EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 2:15-cv GHK-KS Document 37-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:262 EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Case :-cv-0-ghk-ks Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Anthony J. Orshansky CA Bar

More information

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al.

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al. THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Cause No. 2016-74799; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al. A class action settlement involving administrative billing fees allegedly

More information

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD.

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD. HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD ( Plaintiff ) and HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. GERALD M. SOLOWAY ROBERT MORTON ROBERT J.

More information

GLOBAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASES

GLOBAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASES AND MUTUAL RELEASES Background I. This Global Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (this Agreement is intended to settle and release (A all claims that have been asserted or could have been asserted

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS AMANDA OTT, ET AL. AND PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. Case 3:12-cv-00486 Document 247-1 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 7164 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND

More information

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10 Case:-cv-00-MMC Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 EUNICE JOHNSON, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and the general public,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x BARBARA E. BERNARD, COURMANT AND W APNER ASSOCIATES AND ROBERT SUTHERLAND, on behal f of themselves and all others similarly situated, -against- Plaintiffs, UBS W ARBURG LLC AND ANTON W AHLMAN, Defendants.

More information

CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI

CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI COURT ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE SMALL CLAIMS BOOKLET SMALL CLAIMS COURT FILINGS Western Jackson County (Kansas City, Grandview) Jackson County Courthouse 3rd Floor

More information

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DUNBAR DAVIS and REGAN LAING, on behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly-situated, Docket No.: 1:16-cv-03990

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Harris v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Case No.:4:06-cv-00175-KGB If You Are or

More information

1. What is this Notice and why should I read it?

1. What is this Notice and why should I read it? NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT In Re: Aurora Dairy Corp. Organic Milk Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Civil Litigation No. 4:08-md-01907-ERW (ALL CASES) If you purchased Milk Products

More information

If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement.

If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS If you own or have owned one or more TrueSTEAM Humidifiers, you could get a new humidifier or a payment from a class action settlement.

More information

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9 Case Case 1:10-cv-03864-AKH Document Document 476-1 479 Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X MARY K. JONES, Individually and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:11-cv-03701-DMG-MRW Document 87-4 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1484 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----------------------------------------------------X Case

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) IN RE: MERCURY CLASS ACTION ) No. 00 CH 13226 (Cons.) LITIGATION ) Judge Paul P. Biebel, Jr. ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 09/12/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:107

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 09/12/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:107 Case: 1:12-cv-10253 Document #: 43 Filed: 09/12/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:107 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION THOMAS ESTKA, individually and on ) behalf of all

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civ. No. 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL CLASS ACTION TO: NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

IF YOU RECEIVED A PHONE CALL ABOUT A CASH FOR RELOCATION PROGRAM OFFERED BY ALTISOURCE, YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

IF YOU RECEIVED A PHONE CALL ABOUT A CASH FOR RELOCATION PROGRAM OFFERED BY ALTISOURCE, YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. United States District Court for the District of Minnesota IF YOU RECEIVED A PHONE CALL ABOUT A CASH FOR RELOCATION PROGRAM OFFERED BY ALTISOURCE, YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SUMMARY OF ATTACHED NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you obtained a Second Mortgage Loan on your Missouri home from Preferred

More information

X : : X NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

X : : X NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: THERAGENICS CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION X : : X CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:99-CV-0141 (TWT) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS

More information

Class Action Settlement Agreement

Class Action Settlement Agreement Class Action Settlement Agreement 1. Parties This Class Action Settlement Agreement (this Class Action Agreement ) is entered into by and between the following Parties: Charlene Sue Cox, Trustee of Charlene

More information

REPLEVIN PACKET. Information or forms provided by the Clerk of Court should be considered as basic

REPLEVIN PACKET. Information or forms provided by the Clerk of Court should be considered as basic REPLEVIN PACKET *NOTICE* Information or forms provided by the Clerk of Court should be considered as basic information only and may not be applicable to every situation. The information is not intended

More information

Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc Doc. 322 Att. 1. Dockets.Justia.com

Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc Doc. 322 Att. 1. Dockets.Justia.com Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc Doc. 322 Att. 1 Dockets.Justia.com EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A Page 4 NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING AND CLAIM FORM GOOD MORNING

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS is entered into this 5th day of January, 2012, by and between William Dittman (hereinafter

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information