[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]

Transcription

1 SNo. Case No. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE (TIME : 10:30 AM) Petitioner / Respondent CHAMBER MATTERS Petitioner/Respondent Advocate [ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)] 1 Diary No XVI-A 2 Diary No XVI 3 Diary No XVI 4 Diary No X 5 Diary No PIL-W ASHWARYA SINHA AKHILESHWA PRASAD RAVINDRA CHAUDHARI AND ORS. RAMAGYA MANJHI AND ANR. Office report for directions to be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. SHIV SHEW PRASAD AND ORS. SHANTI SHANTI AND ORS. o/r on default to be placed before Hon'ble Chamber Judge DR RAMESH UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. (1)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-fill COL. 1 (2)Non mentioning of date of filing/drawn by.-in LIST OF DATES. (3)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexures in the list of dates/in petition.-in W.P. (4)Other-SINCE MATTER IS FILED AS PIL, ALL THE INFORMATION AS PER PIL GUIDELINES NEEDS TO BE FURNISHED (SHEET ATTACHED) (5)Non-Mentioning in Para 1A of writ petition regarding petitioner having approached the Concerned authority/respondents/ alongwith copy of applications/ representation and outcome.- (6)Non mentioning of date of filing/drawn by.- (7)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-contain BLANKS. (8)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.- (9)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-V/A IS UNDATED. ASTHA SRIVASTAVA UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUBHRO SANYAL BANKEY BIHARI[P-1] SUBHRO SANYAL NULI & NULI SATYAJEET KUMAR

2 6 Diary No PIL-W 7 Diary No PIL-W (1)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-col 4 OF L/P IS NOT FILLEDUP (2)Other-PARA 1 AND 2 OF WRIT PETITION IS NOT CORRECT (ISSUE IS DIFFERENT MENTIONED)AND P-3 IS NOT MARKED IN WRIT PET (3)Incorrect mentioning of description of annexures in Index.-DESCRIPTION OF P-5 IS INCORRECT (4)Other-SIMILAR PARA STATING ANY PETITION FILED BEFOE THIS HON;BLE COURT IS NOT CORRECT AND TWICELY MENTIONED P-7 TO P-9 SEEMS TO BE INCOMPLETE(5)Non-Mentioning in Para 1A of writ petition regarding petitioner having approached the Concerned authority/respondents/ alongwith copy of applications/ representation and outcome.- (6)Contents of petition/appeal, applications And accompanying documents Illegible/ not typed in double space On one side of the paper.-p-1 P-5 TO P-9 IS ILLEGIBLE AND RECAPTION P-2 IN PAPER BOOKS (7)Date(s) of annexures...do not tally.-p-3 TAMIL NADU COW AND BULLS TRADERS AND WORKERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION UNION OF INDIA (1)Page no.... not clear / legible-some PORTION AT PAGE 22 IS DIM, PAGE NOS.32, 35 AND 39 ARE ALSO DIM. (2)Other-THE STAMP OF ASSOCIATION IS HAVING THE WORD (WORKS) BUT IN CAUSE TITLE THE SAME HAS BEEN MENTIONED AS (WORKERS) - PLS. CLARIFY. (3)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed- PAGINATION OF DOCUMENTS HAS NOT BEEN DONE. (4)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-STAMP OF ASSOCIATION DIFFERS, VAKALATNAMA IS UNDATED AND SIGNATURES HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED. (5)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexures in the list of dates/in petition.- (6)Other-LD. AOR TO PLS. DISCLOSE THE PIL REQUIREMENTS (CHECKED) AS PER THE ATTACHED SHEET. (7)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.-ann.p.1 IMPRESSION IS NOT CLEAR AS WELL AS ADDRESS DIFFERS, ANN.P.1 PAGE 84 - SOME PORTION IS IN VERNACULAR, ANN.P.2 AND P.3 - NOT PLACED ACCORDING TO INDEX, ANN.P.2 AND P.3 ARE OF SMALL FONT, ANN.P.4 PAGE NO. 104 TO 106 ARE OF SMALL FONT. (8)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-col. NO.3. ALSO LP HAS NOT BEEN SIGNED IN PBS. (9)Other-TYPE OF WRIT IS INCORRECT (10)Other-PRAYERS OF WRIT ARE NOT PROPER. (11)Other-PARA NO.46 IS NOT PROPER. ALL INDIA JAMIAT UL QURESH UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUVENDU SUVASIS DASH ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY

3 8 Diary No XVI (1)Non filing of office report on limitation with cause title on Green/White Sheet.-TO BE REMOVED FROM PETITION (2)Other- ID OF COUNSEL IS REQUIRED (3)Pages No...contain underlines/highlights/blanks/torn condition.-blank AT PAGE NO. 23 (4)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-blank IN AFFIDAVIT (5)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.-annexures ARE NOT SIGNED AS TRUE COPY (6)Date(s) of annexures...do not tally.-date OF ANNEXURE P 13 DOES NOT TALLY WITH INDEX (7)Other-MATTER RELATES TO PIL. THUS GUIDLINES OF PIL AT S.NOS. A, B, C, D, F OF DEFECT SHEETTO BE COMPLETED (8)Incorrect mentioning of description of annexures in Index.- INCORRECT INDEX (9)Other-FILED ON DATE IS INCORRECT NASER AHMED KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. (1)Incorrect numbering of paragraphs and pagination of paper books and description in Index. PAGES OF PAPER BOOKS NOT CORRECLTY NOTED IN INDEX (LIST OF DATES) (2)Contesting/Proforma Respondents not mentioned separately. (contesting respondent not shown first). (3)Other PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF NOT MENTIONED ON COVER PAGE OF PAPER BOOK. (4)Case no(s). of annexures not given. CASE NO.OF ANNEXURE P-24 NOT MENTIONED PROPERLY (ANNEXURE P-24) (5)Incorrect mentioning of description of annexures in Index. ANNEXURE P-25 DETAILS (DATE) NOT TALLY WITH INDEX/LIST OF DATES. (6)Contents of petition/appeal, applications And accompanying documents Illegible/ not typed in double space On one side of the paper. ANNEXURE P-30, P-31 SLIGHTLY DIM. (7)Other-ANNEXURE P-41 NOT CLEAR. REPLACED. (8)Other- DESCRIPTION OF IA IN SLP NOT MENTIONED PROPERLY IN APPL. FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADD. DOCUMENTS.. (CIVIL APPEAL MENTIONED) (9)Particulars of the impugned judgments not uniformly written in all the documents.- PARTICULARS OF THE I/O WRITTEN INCOMPLETE EVERYWHERE. (INTERIM OR FINAL NOT MENTIONED). AGAINST INTERIM ORDER FURNISH NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE ADV FOR THE RESPONDENTS IN SEPARATE LETTER. (10)Other-CERTIFICATE NOT PROPER (REGARDING ADDL. DOCUMENTS) (11)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.-annexure P-16 (12)Non-Filing of Memo of Parties, as detailed cause title not given in the impugned judgment.-memo OF PARTIES NOT FILED. REPRESENTATION OF R.NO.1 NOT GIVEN. SLP C/T AND STATUS TO BE CHECKED LATER ON. (13)Other-PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF NOT PROPER. KUNAL CHATTERJI

4 9 Diary No XVII 10 Diary No XI-A 11 Diary No IV-A 12 Diary No XI-A 13 Diary No III YAMUNA INDUSTRIES LTD. KHALID ASHRAF AND ORS. (1)Other-KINDLY CLARIFY ABOUT CHALLENGING NUMBERS IN PRAYER OFAPPEAL AT PAGE NO. 146 (2)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.-annexures ARE NOT SIGNED AS TRUE COPY (3)Page no.... not clear / legible-font OF ANNEXURE A 17 IS TOO SMALL FROM PAGES 179 TO 193 AND 203 TO 217 (4)Case no(s). of annexures not given.-case NUMBER OF ANNEXURE A 18 NOT MENTIONED (5)Incorrect mentioning of description of annexures in Index.-DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXURE A 20 DOES NOT TALLY WITH INDEX (6)Page no.... not clear / legible-page NOS 298 AND 299 NOT VISIBLE (7)Incorrect mentioning of description of annexures in petition.-annexurea 21 DOES NOT SHOW ANY ORDER (8)Date(s) of annexures...do not tally.- (9)Incorrrect mentioning of description of annexures in list of dates.-dates OF ANNEXURE A 25 DOES NOT SHOW ORDER DATED SURENDRA DAS AND ANR. CHANDRA BABU (1)Non-filing of copy of the judgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated...etc.-order DATED IS REQUIRED M/S. ANAND AND ASSOCIATES MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF JABALPUR LOKANATHA PANIGRAHI SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE) AND ANR. (1)Other-APPENDIX AND ANNEXURES (TRUE COPY) NOT SIGNED (2)Other-ORDER DATED 25/4/88 NOT FILED (3)Other-TRUE COPY NOT SIGNED THE ALL INDIA GLASS MANUFACTURERS FEDERATION (AIGMF) DCW LIMITED AND ORS. ANANNYA GHOSH WAJEEH SHAFIQ[caveat], SATYA MITRA[caveat] LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL RAKESH K. SHARMA TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI PRAVEENA GAUTAM[caveat], NIKHIL GOEL[caveat][caveat]

5 14 Diary No IX (1)Other- ADDRESS OF ADVOCATE FOR THE PET NOT GIVEN AND AFTER PAGE 299 PAGE IS NOT PAGINATED PAGINATION NOT DONE IN P-5 AND 2N DPAGE OF INDEXOF VOL-I IS NOT FILED IN PAPER BOOKS AND INDEX OF VOL II IS NOT CORRECT AND INDEX OF RESPECTIVEVOLUMES TO BE FILED ACCORDINLGY(2)Other-ADVOCATE TO CLARIFY HOW MANY MATTERS CHALLENGED COURTFEES, CAUSE TITLE CASE NO ETC TO BE CHECKED AND PAY COURTFEES ACCORDINLGY AS PER SPECIAL CATEGORY PAGES OF P-3 IS WRONGLY FILED IN PAPER BOOKS(3)Non filing of application for permission to File lengthy list- (4)Non-furnishing of name and addresses of the counsel, who appeared before the court below, as the petition is against the interim order.- (5)Nonbearing of Signature of the Counsel / Party-In- Person in petition/application- (6)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-blanks IN AFF (7)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-VA IN ALL NOS IS NOT FILED AND RUBBER STAMP OF PET NOT AFFIXED (8)Non Mentioning of capacity of executant for signing of vakalatnama-capacity OF DEPONENT AND ALSO POWER OF ATTORNEY AND FULL NAME IS NOT GIVEN (9)Non filing of application for exemption from Filing certified copy of the impugned judgment/order.-prayer IS NOT CORRECT (10)Particulars of the impugned judgments not uniformly written in all the documents.- (11)Memo of parties has not been filed.-in ALL NOS IS REQUIRED AND REPRESENTATION OF RESPONDENT SNOT GIVEN (12)Contesting/Proforma Respondents not mentioned separately. (contesting respondent not shown first).- (13)Separate cause title not shown (If more than one matter).- (14)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexures in the list of dates/in petition.- (15)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.-true COPY NOT SIGNED (16)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.- (17)Other-SL NOS IS NOT GIVEN IN CAUSE TITLE PRAKASH NARAYAN AHUJA THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. (1)Other DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXURE P-8 IS INCOMPLETE IN INDEX (2)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance. VAK NOT SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES AND RUBBER STAMP OF PETITIONER NO 1. (3)Other ORDER DATED REQUIRED PAGE P AND 23. HIGH COURT PARTICULARS WILL BE CORRECTED IN ALL SUPREME COURT DOCUMENTS LIMITATION REPORT ALSO REVISED(4)Memo of parties has not been filed. IN ALL MATTERS REQUIRED. CAUSE TITLE CHECKED LATER ON (5)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed PARA NOS OF SLP NOT GIVEN (6)Other ETC TO BE DELETEDD WITH RESPONDENTS NAME IN ALL SUPREME COURT DOCUMENTS (7)Deficit Court Fees...More court fee required... RS /- REQUIRED FOR SPECIAL CATEGORY(3500 X 8) F. I. CHOUDHURY

6 15 Diary No IV-A 16 Diary No XV 17 Diary No XVI M/S. TAPI PRESTRESSED PRODUCTS LTD. MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND ORS. (1)Other-C/F OR RS.3500/- MORE REQUIRED AS SPECIAL CATEGORY. (2)Other-PAGE NOS. NOT MENTIONED WITH ANNEX. IN LIST OF DATES. (3)Other-ANNEX. P-1 TO P-12, P-14 ARE NOT LEGIBLE / NOT CLEAR / UNDERLINED. DOUBLE PAGINATION TO BE DELETED TO BE CHECKED.(4)Other-AFFIDAVIT IS BLANK. (5)Other-BLANK IN V/A (CT NOT GIVEN) (6)Other- HC PARTICULAR NOT GIVE IN INDEX. (7)Other- HC CASE NO. GIVEN INCORRECT IN PARA 3 OF SLP (HC TO BE CHECKED EVERYWHERE). (8)Other-MATTER IS WITHIN TIME BARRED APLICATION FOR C/DELAY IS REQUIRED WITH AFFIDAVIT AND C/F. (9)Other-ANNEX. P-13 MENTIONED IN LIST OF DATES BUT NOT FILED. (10)Other-CASE NO. NOT GIVEN IN ANNEX. P-14 ITSELF. (11)Other-DATE OF ANNEX. P-7, P-10 NOT GIVING IN INDEX. (12)Other-COPY OF ORDER DATED IS REQUIRED. (13)Other-INDEX IS INCOMPLETE (SL. NO.24 TO 26) KAILASH CHAND MEENA SURESH YADAV AND ORS. (1)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-central ACT AND SECTION AND COL 6 OF THE L.P HAS NOT FILLED (2)Incomplete/INCORRECT addresses/status of the parties and their representatives.- (3)Non-filing of copy of the judgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated...etc.-exhibits MENTIONED IN I/ORDER IS REQUIRED (4)Cause title of the petition/appeal not corresponding to that of the impugned judgment and names of parties therein.-name/address OF THE RESPONDENT NO 3 NOT GIVEN IN C/T OF SLPN (5)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.-ann/i/order ARE NOT SIGNED AS TRUE COPY BY AOR (6)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.-no OF DELAY DAYS TO BE FILLED IN L/REPORT AND DELAY APPLICATION (7)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-l.p IS UNSIGNED (8)Date(s) of annexures...not given.-p-1 (9)Date(s) of annexures...not given.-p-2 (10)Pages No...contain underlines/highlights/blanks/torn condition.-page NOS OF ANN P_1 AND P-2 NOT TALLY WITH INDEX (11)Page no.... not clear / legible (12)Other-PAPER BOOKS WILL BE RECHECKED LATER ON AFTER CURING THE DEFCTS M/S ASHIRBAD AUTOMOBILES AND ORS. ICICI BANK HARSH PARASHAR K. KRISHNA KUMAR[caveat] SIBO SANKAR MISHRA FUZAIL AHMAD AYYUBI

7 18 Diary No X 19 Diary No IX 20 Diary No XVI (1)Page no.... not clear / legible-page NO 3 IS MISSING IN X PAPER BOOKS (2)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-central ACT AND SECTION NOT FILLED IN L.P (3)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexures in the list of dates/in petition.- (4)Memo of parties has not been filed.- MEMO OF PARTIES IS REQUIRED.C/T WILL BE CHECKED LATER ON (5)Name of High Court, Cause Title etc not shown in plain copy of impugned order/incorrect case number.-name OF THE COURT NOT GIVEN AT PAGE NO 1 (6)Other- APPENDIX ARE NOT FILED IN ORIGINAL AND PAPER BOOKS (7)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-V/A HAS NOT EXECUTED BO P NO 1 AND STAMP OF THE CO NOT GIVEN OF THE PETITIONER NO.2 (8)Page no.... not clear / legible-17-59, (9)Other- PAPER BOOKS WILL BE RECHECKED LATER ON AFTER CURING THE DEFECTS (10)Deficit Court Fees...More court fee required...- MATTER RELATES TO SPECIAL CATEGORY.C/F 3500 MORE REQUIRED ABHISHEK PANDEY AND ORS. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. (1)Pages No...contain underlines/highlights/blanks/torn condition.- BLANK AT PAGE NO E (2)Deficit Court Fees...More court fee required...-c /F RS. 70 IS LESS (3)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexures in the list of dates/in petition.- (4)Details of property/land etc are not mentioned in prayer for interim relief.-prayer OF THE WRIT PETITION IS INCOMPLETE AND TO BE CHECKED LATER ON (5)Non-filing of affidavit containing the statement that the facts stated in the petition are true to the knowledge,information and belief of the deponent.-affidavit IS BLANK (6)Pages No...contain underlines/highlights/blanks/torn condition.-last LINE OF PAGE NO 85 AND 86 ARE MISPRINT (7)Pages No...contain underlines/highlights/blanks/torn condition.-page NO 88 AND 89, 90, 91 (8)Other-ONE PAPER BOOK IS SHORT.PAPER BOOKS WILL BE RECHECKED LATER ON AFTER CIRNG THE DEFECTS KHANDERAO THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. (1)Other-DEFECIT COURT FEES OF RS. 1380/- BE PAID (2)Other-MEMO OF PARTIES REQUIRED IN W.P.NO.7489,6703 AND 6701/17, CIT, STATUS OF THE PARTIES IN SLP CHECKED LATER ON (3)Other-V/A NOT PROPERLY ATTESTED. SIGNED BY GPA HOLDER AND V/A IS NOT CLEAR AS POWER ATTORNEY ONE WHICH IS FILED IS IN HINDI (TRANSLATION) REQUIREDV/A BE COMPARED ON FILING THE SAME IN ALL FOUR MATTERS. (4)Other-ALL P/BOOKS BE CCHECKED AT THE TIME OF RE-FILING MAHENDRA SINGH AND ORS. SUDARSHAN CHOUDHARY AND ORS. VINOD KUMAR TEWARI F. I. CHOUDHURY SHANTANU SAGAR

8 21 Diary No XV 22 Diary No IX 23 Diary No XV 24 Diary No IX 25 Diary No XV (1)Other-C/T - SERIAL NUMBER OF RESPONDENT IS INCORRECT. (2)Other-COPY OF ORDER DATED IS REQUIRED TO BE FILED. (3)Other- DELAY DAYS ARE TO BE FILLED IN THE OFFICE REPORT ON LIMITATION AND APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. M/S. ALPHA BUILDHOME PRIVATE LTD. (1)Other-ANNEXURES REFERRED IN THE LIST OF DATES HAVE NOT BEEN FILED. INCOMPLETE MATTER. IT IS NEED TO RECHECK THE MATTER AFTER CURING THE DEFECTS. NITUBAI SHANKAR DHUMADIA INSTITUTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF THE INDUSTRIAL TRANINIG INSTITUTE AND ANR. (1)Other-BLANK IN AFFIDAVIT. (2)Other-PAGE NO.64 TO 68 ARE IN VERNACULAR LANGUAGE. (3)Other-ORDER DATED IS REQUIRED. (4)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexures in the list of dates/in petition.- (5)Non-Filing of Memo of Parties, as detailed cause title not given in the impugned judgment.- SHAIL BHARGAVA ORS. AND ORS. THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER RAJASTHAN AND ORS. (1)Other-DATE OF DEATH NOT MENTIOEND INIA OF SUBSTITUTION. (2)Other-DEATH CERTIFICATE NOT FILED AND IA FOR C/D IN FILING SUB. AFTER CLARIFICATION DATE OF DEATH. (3)Other-ADDRESS OF THE PARTIES INCOMPLETE. (4)Other-RESPONDENT NO.5 NOT MENTIONED PROEPRLY IN CT OF SLP. VIJAYA THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. (1)Other-PAGINATION OF ALL ANNEXURES TO BE GIVEN. (2)Other-BLANK IN AFFIDAVIT. (3)Other- NO ANNEXURES TO BE CORRECTED IN THE APPLICATION. (4)Other-TRANSLATED COPY OF ANNEXURE P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8 ARE REQUIRED TO FILE (ANNEXURES TO BE CHECKED AT THE TIME OF REFILING). (5)Other- DATE OF ANNEXURE P-1 NOT TALLY. (6)Other- PAGE NO. 28 TO BE SET OUT PROPERLY. (7)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.- (8)Non filing of office report on limitation with cause title on Green/White Sheet.- (9)Other-CASE NO. OF ANNEXURE P-9 IS BLANK. (10)Other-GOVT. RESOLUTION IS REQUIRED. (11)Other-GOVT. RESOLUTION , OR IS REQUIRED. RAJENDRA KUMARI (D) THR (WILL HOLDER) SARVADAM SINGH RANJEET SINGH AND ORS. ROHIT K. SINGH SUNIL KUMAR VERMA BHARTI TYAGI SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI RISHI MATOLIYA

9 26 Diary No IV-B 27 Diary No X 28 Diary No XII (1)Other-CENTRAL ACT IN LISTING PROFORMA NOT WRITTEN. (2)Other-PAGE NOS. OF ANNEX. NOT GIVEN. (3)Other-PAGE NOS. IN INDEX OF SR. NO.26, 27 IS NOT CORRECT. (4)Other-CT OF PETR. TO BE SET OUT PROPERLY EVERYWHERE. (5)Other-APPL. FOR SUBSTITUTION OF LRS. OF PETITIONER NOT FILED. (6)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.- UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. KULWANT KAUR AND ORS. (1)Other-LISTING PROFORMA NOT COMPLETELY FILLED AND SIGNED BY COUNSEL AND PLACED PROPERLY. (2)Other-PAGE NO. 154 IS MISSING. (3)Other-PAGE NO. 303 AND 304 ARE MISSING. (4)Other-APPENDIX IS MISSING. (5)Other- CUTTING AT PAGE NO (6)Other-PAGE NUMBERING NOT CORRECT IN INDEX. (7)Other- M/P NOT FILED. C/T BE CHECKED AFTER FILING OF M/P. (8)Other-DELAY DAYS NOT FILLED IN LR AND APPLICATION FOR C/DELAY. (9)Other-M/P NOT FILED. C/T TO BE CHECKED AFTER FILING OF M/P. BISWAJIT RAY LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR. (1)Incorrect numbering of paragraphs and pagination of paper books and description in Index.-WRONG COURT FEE HAS BEEN MENTIONED IN INDEX, INDEX HAS BEEN PREPARED IN SMALL FONT. (2)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-cause TITLE (NAME OF RESPONDENT) BE GIVEN CORRECTLY, PAGINATION OF LIST OF DATES HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. (3)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-SIGNATURES BE IDENTIFIED/CERTIFIED. (4)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.-annexures HAVE NOT BEEN CERTIFIED AS TRUE COPIES. (5)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-col. NO.1 (6)Other-WRIT PETITION HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED PROPERLY TO THIS HON. COURT. (7)Other-TYPE OF WRIT HAS NOT BEEN MENTIONED IN PARA NO.1 AND IN PRAYER. (8)Other-PAGE 4 - ANN. P.1 - DATE DIFFERS,CERTIFICATE IS AT PAGE 15 AND PAGE 16 IS A COPY OF THE VOTER I CARD OF THE PETITIONER - PLS. CORRECT DESCRIPTION ACCORDINGLY. (9)Other-PAGE PARA 11 IS INCOMPLETE (10)Non-Mentioning in Para 1A of writ petition regarding petitioner having approached the Concerned authority/respondents/ alongwith copy of applications/ representation and outcome.- (11)Other-PRAYER (A) AND (B) ARE NOT SPECIFIC/NOT PROPER./INCOMPLETE. ENQUIRY OFFICER OFFICE OF THE CO OP DEPUTY REGISTRAR MUSIRI TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR NITIN KUMAR THAKUR K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR

10 29 Diary No IV-A 30 Diary No IX 31 Diary No PIL-W M.ANBALAGAN (1)Other-DEFECIT COURT FEES OF RS.2000/- BE PAID. ANNEXTURES MARKED IN LIST OF DATES NOT FILED, MATTER IS INCOMPLETE. MAY BE RECHECKED ON FILING THE SAME. MAROTI AND ORS. DEOCHAND AND ANR. (2)Other-NAME OF THE RESPONDENT NOIN BOTH THE MATTERS NOT CORRECTLY MENTIONED IN C/T OF SLP (3)Other-ON BEHALF OF OTHER PETITIONERS NOT MENTIONED IN IST PARAOF THE AFFIDAVIT (4)Non-bearing of Signature of the Counsel / Party-In-Person in petition/application- (5)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.-annsare NOT SIGNED AS TRUE COPY BY AOR (6)Other-IN BOTH THE MATTER TO BE MENTIONED IN V/A (7)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-l.p IS UNSIGNED (8)Pages No...contain underlines/highlights/blanks/torn condition.-page NO ARE MISSING (9)Other-PAGE NO 72 IS DIM (10)Deficit Court Fees...More court fee required...-court FEES 540 IS DEFICIT VIDHUDDHA VIDYALAYA YAVATMAL VASANT AND ORS. (1)Other-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR R-7 IS REQUIRED. (2)Other-R-7 TO BE CLARIFY. (3)Other-PARA 1B OF SLP TO BE CLARIFY. (4)Other-IA FOR C/D IS UNSIGNED. (5)Nonaffixation of Welfare Stamp.- (6)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.- (7)Other-SALE DEED DATED , EXHIBITS IN I/O ARE REQUIRED. (8)Other- LISTING PROFORMA IS UNSIGNED. PREM SINGH KHAMESRA AND ORS. JAYPEE INFRATECH LIMITED AND ORS. (1)Other-PAGE NOS. NOT GIVEN AGAINST ANNEX. IN WP. (2)Other-BLANK IN AFFIDAVIT. (3)Other-ANNEX. P-3 NOT MARKED. (4)Other- ANNEX. P-1 AND P-2HAVING SMALL FONT / LEGIBLE. (5)Other-ANNEX. NOT PROPERLY MARKED. (6)Other-RESPONDENT NO.1, 4 AND 6 ARE PRIVATE PARTIES, COUNSEL TO CLARIFY. (7)Other-COPY OF SECTION 30, 31, 53 ALONGWITH REGULATION 38 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY REGULATION REQUIRED TO BE FILED. (8)Other-THE PETITIONER IS REQUIRD AND DISCLOSE DTHE REQUIREMENTS AS PER SHEET ATTACHED HEREWITH (9)Other- ADV. TO CLARIFY WHETHER HE HAS APPROACHED THE CONCERNED RESPONDENT FOR SIMILAR RELIEF, IF YES APPROACHING THE CONCERNED RESPONDENT WITH ITS RESULT TO BE GIVEN. (10)Other-SL.NO.1 OF INDEX NOT PROPER. KAILASH CHAND[caveat] RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARY CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI SANDEEP DEVASHISH DAS

11 32 Diary No XV 33 Diary No IX 34 Diary No XI-A 35 Diary No XVI RATAN PRAKASH DARJI GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. (1)Non filing of brief list of dates/events.-date AT PAGE B SEEMS INCORRECT. (2)Other-NAME OF FATHER OF PETITIONER IS SLIGHLTY DIFFERENT. (3)Non-furnishing of name and addresses of the counsel, who appeared before the court below, as the petition is against the interim order.- (4)Other-SHORT CAUSE TITLE IN CERTIFICATE IS INCOMPLETE. (5)Annexures...referred to in the petition not true copies of the documents before the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.- (6)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-V/A IS NOT CERTIFIED AND IDENTIFIED BY AOR. (7)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-unsigned IN PAPER BOOKS. (8)Other-IMPUGNED ORDER IS SLIGHTLY DIM. (9)Other-PAGE 72 IS IN VERNACULAR, SUPPLY TRANSLATION. (10)Other- WORDS NEED TOUCHING IN ANNEXURE P-7, P-11 SOME WORDS ARE NOT LEGIBLE IN ANNEXURE P-11 DUE TO STAMP. CHHAYA SHAKUNTALABAI AND ORS. (1)Other-ANNEX. NO. BLANK IN PARA 4 OF SLP. (2)Other-APPENDIX AND ANNEX. P-1, PAGES 23 TO 42 NOT FILED. (3)Other-BOTH IASNOT FILED (4)Other-INCOMPLETE INDEX. (5)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.- RAKHAL CHANDRA MURMU AND ORS. PAMA MURMU AND ORS. (1)Other-AFTER PAGE NO.119 ONE PAGE IS UNNUMBERED. (2)Other-C/T DOES NOT TALLY WITH I/ORDER. (3)Other-L/REPORT IS REQUIRED IN GREEN SHEET. (4)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.- HARE KRISHNA SARKAR SRI DHIREN NONDAL AND ORS. RASHMI SINGHANIA AMOL B. KARANDE BHARAT SANGAL SAHIL BHALAIK RAUF RAHIM[caveat][caveat][caveat ], PRIYA PURI[caveat]

12 36 Diary No IX 37 Diary No IV-B 38 Diary No IV-B (1)Deficit Court Fees...More court fee required /- (2)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-presently AT NEW DELHI HAS BEEN MENTIONED. (3)Non-affixation of Welfare Stamp.- (4)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-SIGNATURES BE IDENTIFIED/CERTIFIED. (5)Particulars of the impugned judgments not uniformly written in all the documents.-name OF HIGH COURT, ALSO PLS. CONFIRM HOW MANY MATTERS HAVE BEEN CHALLENGED, COURT FEE TO BE PAID ACCORDINGLY. (6)Other-ANN.P.1 AND P.2 HAVE NOT BEEN PLACED AS PER INDEX, ANN.P.5 CASE NO. MISSING, ANN.P.6 NAME OF HIGH COURT IS MISSING, ANN.P.7 PAGINATION IS NOT PROPER (IS UPTO 101), ANN.P.13 SEEMS INCOMPLETE. (7)Non-filing of copy of the judgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated...etc.-order DT , (8)Other-ORDER OF SLP IS INCORRECT. (9)Other-PAGE G - CAN NO. SEEMS INCORRECT. (10)Other-PAGE 25 - PARA NO.2 HAS BEEN WRONGLY MARKED AS PARA NO.1 AND SUBSEQUENT PARA NOS.3 AND 4 ALSO... (11)Other-CERTIFICATE BE PLACED BEFORE AFFIDAVIT. MAHARASHTRA STATE CO OPERATIVE SONSUMERS FEDRATION LTD. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. (1)Other-V/A NOT PROPERLY EXECUTED. RUBBER STAMP REQUIRED. MENTION NAME OF THE EXECUTANT BELOW SIGNATURE. MEMO OF APPEARANCE NOT SIGNED BY COUNSEL. (2)Other-ANNEXTURE AS TRUE COPY NOT SIGNED (3)Other-DECISION DT. 05/10/15 MENTIONED IN IMPUGNED ORDER NOT FILED. (4)Other-LISTING PROFORMA UNSIGNED IN PAPER BOOKS KUMAR GAURAV SATISH RATTI (1)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.-delay DAYS NOT MENTIONED. (2)Other-CAPTION OF APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM CERTIFIED COPY IS WRONG. (3)Non-furnishing of statement as to whether LPA or Writ Appeal lies against the impugned judgment and whether the said remedy has been availed.- (4)Particulars of the impugned judgments not uniformly written in all the documents.-date OF IMPUGNED ORDER IS WRONG IN LISTING PROFORMA (5)Other- CLARIFY WHY ORDER DT IN REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN CHALLENGED. (6)Other-FACTS AND GROUNDS ARE MENTIONED IN PARA 1 OF SLP (7)Other-SERIAL NOS. 6, 7, 24 AND 25 OF INDEX ARE NOT FILLED/NOT PROPERLY FILLED. (8)Other-DIM IMPRESSION/SMALL FONT IN IMPUGNED ORDER AND ANNX. P-11 (9)Other- PAGE NUMBERING NOT PROPER IN ANNX. P-8. ONE PAGE AFTER PAGE 75 NOT NUMBERED. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. F. I. CHOUDHURY SHYAMAL KUMAR MONIKA GUSAIN

13 39 Diary No XV 40 Diary No III 41 Diary No PIL-W MAHINDER SINGH AND ORS. (1)Other-PAGE NOS ARE MISSING (AWARD DATED ) (2)Other-RESPONDENT NO.16 NAME OF RESPONDENT IS DIFFERS. (3)Other- STATUS REPORT DATED NOT FILED. (4)Other-LISTING PROFORMA NOT COMPLETELY FILLED. (5)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexures in the list of dates/in petition.- DEENDAYAL LAHOTI THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. (1)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-central ACT ANDSECTION NOT MENTIONEDIN L.P (2)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-col 5 NOT FILLED IN L.P (3)Other-APPENDIX ARE NOT FILED IN ORIGINAL AND PAPER BOOKS (4)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.-no OF DELAY TO BE FILLED IN L/REPORT AND DELAY APPLICATION (5)Other- PAGE NO 18 IS NOT CLEAR KIRITBHAI GOKULBAHI PARIKH JYOTSANABEN BHUPENDRA AMIN AND ANR. (1)Other-CENTRAL ACT NOT MENTIONED. (2)Other-PAGE NO.34 NOT FOUND IN ORIGINAL (3)Other-PAGE NOS.24 TO 38 TO BE REPLACED IN PAPER BOOKS. (4)Non-affixation of Welfare Stamp.- AMARENDRA ROUT THE STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS. CHARU MATHUR HEMAL KIRITKUMAR SHETH HITENDRA NATH RATH KHAITAN & CO.

14 42 Diary No XII (1)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-para NO.1 IS INCORRECT AS SOLE PETITIONER IS THERE IN THE PETITION. (2)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.- VAKALATNAMA IS IN TORNED CONDITION. (3)Non-Mentioning in petitions/appeal of statement In terms of order XXI RULE 3/ORDER XXII RULE 2 of Supreme Court Rules. (Whether petitioner has filed any petition Against the impugned order/judgment earlier, and if so, the result thereof stated). ).-PAGE 9 - PARA 14 - IS NOT PROPER. (4)Incomplete/INCORRECT addresses/status of the parties and their representatives.-representation OF R.NO.1 IS INCORRECT, REPETITION OF WORDS IN ADDRESS OF R.NO.7 BE REMOVED, RESPONDENT NOS.6 AND 7 ARE PRIVATE PARTIES, MADE AS RESPONDENTS - PLS. CLARIFY. (5)Other-ANN.P.1 ILLEGIBLE WORDS AT PAGE 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28 AND 29, ANN.P.3 NOT ADDRESSED PROPERLY, ANN.P.4 PERTAINS TO SOME OTHER PERSON. (6)Nonfiling of copy of the judgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated...etc.-order DT , AND LETTER DT (MUST) (7)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-col. NOS.2 AND 4 (8)Other-ORDER AND RULES ARE INCORRECT (OF W.P.) (9)Other-PAGE B - STATEMENT IN LAST FOUR LINES IS NOT PROPER. (10)Other-PAGE G - STATEMENT DT IS NOT IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER (11)Other-PAGE C AND 6 - STATEMENT IS INCOMPLETE (DATE MISSING) (12)Other-PAGE 3 - PARA 1A IS NOT PROPER AS SOLE PETITIONER IS THERE IN THE PETITION. (13)Other-PARA NO.2 AT PAGE 4 - STATEMENT IS INCORRECT. (14)Non-Mentioning in Para 1A of writ petition regarding petitioner having approached the Concerned authority/respondents/ alongwith copy of applications/ representation and outcome.- (15)Other-PRAYER AT PAGE 12 IS INCORRECT. (16)Other-PIL GUIDELINES (AS PER THE ATTACHED SHEET) ARE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLIED WITH BY LD. AOR. SHUNMUGHA NATHAN BEEMAN LILY ISABEL THOMAS

15 43 Diary No (SCLSC) XIV 44 Diary No PIL-W 45 Diary No XV 46 Diary No IV-A (1)Other-ONE MORE SET OF C/F IS REQUIRED. (2)Other-MARGINAL DATE NOT GIVEN IN L/D. (3)Other-PAGE NOS., PARA NOS. OF SLP AND LIST OF DATES NOT MENTIONED. (4)Other- AFFIDAVIT OF PETR. IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION/APPL. IS REQUIRED. (5)Other-V/A IS NOT IDENTIFIED / CERTIFIED / SATISFIED. C/T NOT GIVEN IN V/A AND ALSO UNDATED(6)Other- NEITHER C/COPY OF I/O NOR APPL. FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C HAS NOT BEEN FILED. (7)Other-H/C CASE NO. NOT MENTIONED PROPERLY EVERYWHERE (REVISION PETITION (NPI) (MDNO. OR CRP(NPD) (MD) NO. (8)Other- SIGNATURE OF ADV. TO BE DELETED FROM P/B. (9)Other-APPENDIX IS NOT SIGNED AS TRUE COPY. (10)Non-affixation of Welfare Stamp.- (11)Non-Filing of Memo of Parties, as detailed cause title not given in the impugned judgment.- (12)Other-COPY OF ORDER DATED AND ARE REQUIRED. (13)Other-COL.6 TO BE FILLED PROPERLY. (14)Other- ADDRESS OF ADV. NOT MENTIONED. (15)Other-PARA 3, 4, 6 OF SLP NOT PROPER / INCOMPLETE. (16)Other- DES. OF APPENDIX NOT GIVEN IN INDEX. (ONLY ONE P/B CHECKED. ALL PB TO BE CHECKED AT THE TIME OF CURING DEFECTS.)(17)Non mentioning of date of filing/drawn by.- PRABHAT CHANDRA DAS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. (1)Other-PAPER BOOKS ARE IN TORN CONDITION. (2)Other-INQUIRY REPORTS DATED , ORDER DATED , , ARE REQUIRED. (3)Non filing of office report on limitation with cause title on Green/White Sheet.- MARJIT SARKAR AND ANR. REGISTRAR GENERAL CALCUTTA HIGH COURT AND ORS. (1)Other-PAGE B IS MISSING. (2)Other-V/A OF BOTH PETRS. NOT FILED. (3)Other-DATE OF ANNEX. P-2, P-3, P-4, P-8 NOT TALLY WITH INDEX. (4)Other-ANNEX. P-13 NOT CAPTIONED AND NOT TALLY WITH INDEX. (5)Other-COPY OF RESOLUTION DATED AT PAGE I IS REQUIRED. ORDER DATED , COPY OF REPRESENTATION NOT FILED.(6)Other-PLEASE SEE DEFECTS OF PIL IN ATTACHED SHEET ALSO. (7)Non-affixation of Welfare Stamp.- JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MANGLA AND ANR. AND ANR. (1)Case no(s). of annexures not given.- ANNEXURES HAVE NOT BEEN FILED. MATTER IS INCOMPLETE AND WILL BE RE-CHECKED AFTER THE COMPLETE ANNEXURES ARE FILED. GULJAR MOIUDDIN ABDUL MAJID (D) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE DR. SAYED ORUJ AHMAD PARMANAND GAUR SHALINI KAUL AURA & CO. RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARY

16 47 Diary No IV-B (1)Case no(s). of annexures not given.- ANNEXURES HAVE NOT BEEN FILED. MATTER IS INCOMPLETE AND WILL BE RE-CHECKED AFTER THE COMPLETE ANNEXURES ARE FILED. (2)Deficit Court Fees...More court fee required...-20/- (3)Other-I.A. FOR C/DELAY IN REFILING SLP HAS NOT BEEN PAGINATED. (4)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-para NO.1 OF AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER IN SUPPORT OF C/DELAY IN REFILING SLP APPLN. IS NOT PROPER AS SOLE PETITIONER IS THERE IN THE MATTER. (5)Particulars of the impugned judgments not uniformly written in all the documents.-name OF HIGH COURT (6)Incomplete/INCORRECT addresses/status of the parties and their representatives.-name OF PETITIONER AND AGE DIFFERS (IN VIEW OF I/O) (7)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.- (8)Non-filing of copy of the judgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated...etc.-order DT AND (9)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.- and IA No.27144/2018- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.27147/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AMIT THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. PRANAYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

17 48 Diary No XV 49 Diary No XIV (1)Particulars of the impugned judgments not uniformly written in all the documents.-case NO OF I/ORDER WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SR NO 9 IN THE INDEX (2)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.-no OF DELAY DAYS TO BE CORRECTED IN L/REPORT AND DELAY APPLICATION (3)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-col 1 OF L.P HAS NOT FILLED (4)Non-filing of copy of the judgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated...etc.- NOTIFICATION DT AND AND MENTIONED AT PAGE NO B IS REQUIRED (5)Non-filing of copy of the judgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated...etc.-exhibits MENTIONED IN I/ORDER ARE REQUIRED (7)Nonfiling of affidavit containing statements based on information, whether the deponent has disclosed the source of this information, including official records.-pages OF SLP WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE AFFIDAVIT (8)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-V/A HAS NOT EXECUTED BY PETITIONER NO2 IN RFA 4038/16 (9)Improper execution of vakalatnama/memo of Appearance.-V/A IS UNDATED (10)Page no.... not clear / legible-5, 6-TO 17, 45ARE SMALL FONT AND PAGE NO 19 TO 27 LEFT SIDE MISPRINT (11)Non-filing of affidavit containing the statement that the facts stated in the petition are true to the knowledge,information and belief of the deponent.-affidavit IS BLANK IN PAPER BOOKS (12)Other-PAGE NO 105 IS MISSING AND PAGENO 104 NOT PROPERLY FILED AND TO BE CHECKED LATER ON (13)Other-PAGE NO OF ANN P-9 NOT GIVEN AT PAGE NO 117 MADAN MOHAN PRAJAPAT HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR AND ANR. (1)Other-PARTICULAR IN SR. NO.9 OF INDEX NOT CORRECT. (2)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.- MALSON KHAKLARI AND ORS. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

18 50 Diary No IV-A (1)Other-DETAILS OF I/ORDER TO BE MENTIONED IN INDEX. (2)Other-DETAILS OF SL. NO.19 TO BE REMOVED FROM INDEX. (3)Other- BLANK IN AFFIDAVIT. (4)Other-V/A TO BE CHECKED. (5)Other-V/A IS SIGNED BY MORE THAN ONE PETITIONER. (6)Other-ORDER AND RULE OF PARA 3 AND 4 TO BE CORRECTED. (7)Other-MEMO OF PARTIES WRONG CAE NO. IS SHOWN. C/T TO BE CHECKED. (8)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexures in the list of dates/in petition.- (9)Non filing of application for exemption from Filing certified copy of the impugned judgment/order.- (10)Particulars of the impugned judgments not uniformly written in all the documents.- (11)Other-ANNEX. ARE NOT TALLY WITH INDEX / L/D/ ITSELF. (12)Other- ANNEX. ARE NOT ATTESTED AS TRUE COPIES. (13)Other-ORDER DATED (NECESSARY) IS REQUIRED (14)Non filing of office report on limitation with cause title on Green/White Sheet.- (15)Non inclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.- THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. DUA RAM MAHESHWAR (1)Other-COPY OF ORDER DATED AND REQUIRED TO BE FILED (2)Nonmentioning OF the number of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee.- ARJUN GARG[P-1] NEW DELHI :14:38 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR