EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE LAW OF THE LAND
|
|
- Ross Montgomery
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE LAW OF THE LAND IN NORTH CAROLINA Jeanette K. Doran Senior Staff Attorney, North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 INTRODUCTION On July 4, 1776, fifty-six delegates to the Continental Congress unabashedly signed the Declaration of Independence which proclaimed that in the land of the free and home of the brave, We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. This statement is embodied in N.C. Const. Art. I, 19, which provides: No person shall be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner deprived of his life, liberty, or property, but by the law of the land. No person shall be denied the equal protection of laws; nor shall any person be subjected to discrimination by the State because of race, color, religion, or national origin. In general, as the Supreme Court explained more than half a century ago, The equal protection clause and law of the land clause of the North Carolina Constitution imposes upon law-making bodies the requirement that any legislation classification provide a reasonable means to a legitimate state objective. Powe v. Odell, 312 N.C. 410, 412, 322 S.E.2d 762, 763 (1984). The purpose of this memo is to outline the doctrine surrounding this general statement, beginning with equal protection and ending with the law of the land. EQUAL PROTECTION When an Equal Protection claim is asserted, the basic allegation involved is that a statute or government action violates either a fundamental right or arbitrarily and capriciously discriminates between two like classes or against a protected class. When presented with such a
2 challenge, the Court must first determine the appropriate level of scrutiny to apply to the challenged enactment. Dept. of Transp. v. Rowe, 353 N.C. 671, 675, 549 S.E.2d 203, 207 (2001). Texfi Indus. indicates that there are two possible levels of scrutiny, namely strict scrutiny and rational basis review. Texfi Indus., Inc. v. City of Fayetteville, 301 N.C. 1, 11, 269 S.E.2d 142, 149 (1980). Because the North Carolina Supreme Court expressly incorporated the equal protection law made explicit in U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV into N.C. CONST. Art. I 19 nearly four decades ago, there should also be an intermediate level of scrutiny, S.S. Kresge Co. v. Davis, 277 N.C. 654, 178 S.E.2d 382 (1971); however, it is unclear whether North Carolina would apply such review since research reveals no cases on point. In any case, it is possible, and therefore its doctrine, too, shall be discussed below after the two which are definitely used by North Carolina courts. A. Strict Scrutiny If a government enactment stands to impact a citizen s ability to exercise a fundamental right or if a governmental classification distinguishes between persons on a suspect basis, a strict scrutiny analysis is applied. Texfi Indus., 301 N.C. at 11, 269 S.E.2d at 149; see United States v. Carolene Products, 304 U.S. 144, 152 n.4 (1938). 1 Under strict scrutiny, the government must demonstrate that the challenged classification is narrowly tailored to promote a compelling governmental interest. Id. What is a fundamental right or suspect class? Fundamental rights are those enumerated in the Bill of Rights, Carolene Products, 304 U.S. at 152 n.4, and those penumbral ones 1 According to Carolene Products, heightened scrutiny is appropriate when: (1) legislation appears on its face to be within a specific prohibition of the Constitution, (2) the legislation restricts those political processes which can ordinarily be expected to bring about repeal of undesirable legislation, and (3) legislation prejudice[s] against discrete and insular minorities. 304 U.S. 144, 152 n.4 (1938).
3 determined by the United States Supreme Court. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965). Examples of fundamental rights include the right to privacy, U.S. CONST. Amend. IV, the right to vote, Hill v. Stone, 421 U.S. 289 (1975), the right of a mother to abort her fetal child, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and the interest of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children, Troxel v. Granville 530 U.S. 57 (2000). A class is suspect when it is saddled with disabilities, or subjected to such a history of purposeful unequal treatment, or relegated to such a position of political powerlessness as to command particular consideration from the judiciary. Texfi Indus., 301 N.C. at 11, 269 S.E.2d at 149. An example of strict scrutiny analysis can be found in Parents Involved in Comty. Sch. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007). In that case, two school districts voluntarily adopted student assignment plans to avoid re-segregation of the schools and maintain racial balance. Since this government action was based upon racial discrimination, the court applied strict scrutiny because of the long history of racial discrimination. The government advanced two interests in its defense, alleging it was trying to maintain diversity and remedy the past effects of discrimination. Even though these interests were held sufficiently compelling when a place of higher education was involved, Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), they did not apply to lower-level schools. Parents Involved memorably stated, Distinctions between citizens solely because of their ancestry are by their very nature odious to a free people whose institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality. (citing Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaI, 515 U.S. 200 (1995)). B. Rational Basis Review
4 When a law does not involve a suspect class or a fundamental right, a rational basis analysis is employed. Texfi Indus., 301 N.C. at 11, 269 S.E.2d at 149. Under the rational basis test, the challenged enactment is presumed constitutional; it need bear only some rational relationship to a legitimate governmental interest; and the challenging party bears the burden of proof. Id. Furthermore, any legislative classification must be based on differences that are reasonably related to the purposes of the Act in which it is found. Morey v. Doud, 354 U.S. 457 (1957); see also In re Appeal of Martin, 286 N.C. 66, 76, 209 S.E.2d 766, 773 (1974) (citing Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway, 281 U.S. 146 (1930)) ( [w]hile the General Assembly may not establish a classification that is arbitrary or capricious, a classification [under equal protection] is constitutional if founded upon a reasonable distinction or difference and bears a substantial relation to the object of the legislation. ) This does not mean that the regulation must reach every class to which the purpose might be applicable; the legislature may use its discretion to root out those evils it perceives without tackling all abuses. Raleigh Mobile Home Sales, Inc. v. Tomlinson, 276 N.C. 661, 174 S.E.2d 542 (1970). Still, it cannot regulate arbitrarily either as between similarly situated persons, or groups of persons, or as between activities which are prohibited and those which are permitted. State v. Greenwood, 280 N.C. 651, 657, 187 S.E.2d 8, (1972) (quoting Raleigh Mobile Homes Sales, Inc. v. Tomlinson, 276 N.C. 661, , 174 S.E.2d 542, 546 (1970)). Several cases help elucidate application of these principles. In State v. Greenwood, the court invalidated an ordinance that banned operation of billiard halls on Sundays, but allowed the operation of all other facilities for recreation, amusement, and sports on Sundays. The court concluded that there was no rational basis for singling out billiard halls in light of the apparent purpose of promoting Sunday as a day of rest and tranquility. 280 N.C. at , 187 S.E.2d at
5 In State v. Smith, 265 N.C. 173, 143 S.E.2d 293 (1965), an enactment closing clubs located within 300 yards of churches or schools between 2:00 a.m. and midnight on Sunday, was held to deny equal protection of the laws, the court noting that schools were not in session and churches were not meeting during the hours the clubs operated, and the court finding no reasonable basis for the 300 yard distance requirement. In Cheek v. City of Charlotte, the court struck down an ordinance creating detailed regulations for the operation of massage parlors, health salons and physical culture studios, but excepted barber shops, beauty parlors, and YMCA and YWCA health clubs. Cheek v. City of Charlotte, 273 N.C. 293, 160 S.E.2d 18 (1968). Another matter to remember is that statutes are void as class legislation when persons who are engaged in the same business are subject to different restrictions or are treated differently under the same conditions. Poor Richard s v. Stone, 322 N.C. 61, 67, 366 S.E.2d 697, 700 (1988) (citing Cheek, 273 N.C. 293, 160 S.E.2d 18). The law must operate[] alike on all members of the class which includes all persons and property similarly situated. State v. Glidden Co., 228 N.C. 664, 667, 46 S.E.2d 860, 862 (1948). Classification is permitted only when (1) it is based on differences between the business to be regulated and other businesses and (2) when these differences are rationally related to the purpose of the legislation. Poor Richard s, 322 N.C. at 67, 366 S.E.2d at 700 (citing State v. Harris, 216 NC 746, 6 S.E.2d 854 (1940)). State v. Glidden illustrates these principles. That case concerned a statute prohibiting the disposal of deleterious substances into the waters of state but exempted from its application corporations chartered before the year In striking down the statute on equal protection grounds, our Supreme Court stated, [a]ny classification or discrimination must not be arbitrary or unreasonable; and the legislation must not be discriminatory in the sense of applying
6 unequally to persons pursuing or engaged in the same calling, profession, or business under the same or like conditions or circumstances. Id. at 667, 46 S.E.2d at 862 (quoting C.J.S., Constitutional Law, 510, p. 1014). The court finally held that the statute at issue had no reasonable relation to the purpose of the law, only serving to mechanically split into two groups persons in like situation with regard to the subject matter dealt with....and that the attempted classification [was] not based upon a justifiable distinction." Id. at 668, 46 S.E.2d at 862. C. Intermediate Scrutiny As stated above, research reveals no North Carolina cases that have applied intermediate scrutiny. Texfi Co. indicates that there are only two standards, though it cites federal precedent when explaining the levels of scrutiny. In federal courts, when gender discrimination is alleged, intermediate scrutiny is applied. Under this standard, in order for a statute to survive an equal protection challenge, it must serve important governmental objectives and must be substantially related to those objectives. Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 197 (1976) (emphasis added). The government has the burden to present an exceedingly persuasive justification for its [discriminatory] action. United State v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515, 530 (1996). Under this doctrine, if the legislation is based upon antiquated notions on gender placement or overbroad generalization instead of real differences between a man and woman, it will be struck down. For example, in Kirchber v. Feenstra, the Court struck down a Louisiana statute which gave the husband unilateral ability to alienate property he jointly held with his wife as head and master of the property. 450 U.S. 455, 459 (1981). But in Rostker v. Goldberg, the Court upheld a federal law requiring men but not women for register for the draft since women were excluded from combat. 453 U.S. 57, (1981).
7 LAW OF THE LAND The term law of the land [hereinafter due process] is synonymous with due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. And as it is synonymous, decisions by federal courts regarding the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments due process provisions serve as persuasive authority for North Carolina law of the land challenges. And just as there is procedural and substantive due process under the U.S. Constitution so does North Carolina s equivalent doctrine provide both and more. A. Procedural Due Process Procedural due process, in its most basic form, demands both notice and an opportunity to be heard before a competent tribunal before a person shall be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner deprived of his life, liberty, or property. Parker v. Stewart, 29 N.C. App. 747, 225 S.E.2d 632 (1976); Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 41 N.C. App. 299, 254 S.E.2d 643 (1979). In Parker v. Stewart, the Court struck down a Harnett County ordinance which allowed the sheriff to revoke licenses of massage parlors. 29 N.C. App. at 748, 225 S.E.2d at 633. The court reasoned that revoking a license was a deprivation of property and that a hearing before the county sheriff did not provide sufficient due process for the circumstances. Id. There is a plethora of cases and statutes that govern what the appropriate process is given particular circumstances 2, and to cover them all would protract this memo into a thesis. Suffice 2 A few examples of procedural due process cases include: Peace v. Employ. Sec. Com n of North Carolina, 349 N.C. 315, 507 S.E.2d 272 (1998); Griffin v. Griffin, 348 N.C. 278, 500 S.E.2d 437 (1998); Matter of Alamance County Court Facilities, 329 N.C. 84, 405 S.E.2d 125 (1991); Randaleman v. Hinshaw, 267 N.C. 136, 147 S.E.2d 902 (1966); Browning v. North Carolina State Highway Com., 263 N.C. 130, 139 S.E.2d 227 (1964); McMillan v. Robeson County, 262 N.C. 413, 137 S.E.2d 105 (1964); State v. Parrish, 254 N.C. 301, 118 S.E.2d 786 (1961); Kirkpatrick v. Currie, 250 N.C. 213, 108 S.E.2d 209 (1959); Pruitt v. Taylor, 247 N.C. 380, 100 S.E.2d 841 (1957); Re Gupton, 238 N.C. 303, 77 S.E.2d 716 (1953); Re Edwards Estate, 234 N.C. 202, 66 S.E.2d 675 (1951); McLean
8 it to say that, as the Supreme Court noted in Matthews v. Eldridge, due process... is not a technical conceptions with a fixed content unrelated to time, place, and circumstances,... [but rather] is flexible and calls for such procedural protection as the particular situation demands. 424 U.S. 319, 334 (1976) (citations omitted) The issues common to them all is (1) whether there has been a deprivation, (2) whether the deprivation was to a constitutionally protected area such as life, liberty, or property, and (3) whether sufficient due process was provided? ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES 548 (Aspen Publishers 2006). If a statute or regulation deprives one of a right protected by due process of law and fails to provide sufficient notice and hearing, it will be struck down as unconstitutional, even if in administration notice and hearing are provided. Bowie v. West Jefferson, 231 N.C. 408, 57 S.E.2d 369 (1950). B. Substantive Due Process Substantive due process imposes limitations on the exercise of the State s police power so that no act done by it can be unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious, and the means selected have a substantial relation to the ends sought. State v. Whitaker, 228 N.C. 352, 45 S.E.2d 860 (1947), aff d, 335 U.S. 525 (1949). Essentially, it can be characterized as a standard of reasonableness in relation to the public good likely to come from it. Lowe v. Tarble, 313 N.C. 460, 465, 329 S.E.2d 648, 652 (1985); In re Certificate of Need for Aston Park Hosp., Inc., 282 N.C. 542, 550, 192 S.E.2d 729, 735 (1973); State v. Smith, 265 N.C. 173, 180, 142 S.E.2d 293, 299 (1965). This amounts to a rational basis review equivalent to that presented under the equal protection section. Lowe v. Tarble, 313 N.C. at 465, 329 S.E.2d at 652. The only difference is v. McLean, 233 N.C. 139, 63 S.E.2d 138 (1951); Lexington v. Lopp, 210 N.C. 196, 185 S.E. 766 (1936); Swanson v. Herschel, 174 N.C. App. 803, 622 S.E.2d 159 (2005); First Union Nat l Bank v. Rolfe, 83 N.C. App. 625, 351 S.E.2d 117 (1986).
9 that due process looks to the overall fairness of the challenge government action of statute instead of considering classifications. Id. But this is not the end of what North Carolina due process has to offer. While the law of the land clause is generally considered the functional equivalent of the due process clause of the United State Constitution, it has its own jurisprudence and exacting standards. For cases in which the law of the land clause arises outside the context of traditional due process, the Supreme Court has articulated a two-part test for determining the constitutionality of legislation: Although this Court often considers the law of the land synonymous with due process of law, we have reserved the right to grant Section 19 relief against unreasonable and arbitrary state statutes in circumstances where relief might not be obtainable under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Nonetheless, the two-fold constitutional inquiry under both the North Carolina and United States Constitutions is the same: (1) Does the regulation have a legitimate objective; and (2) if so, are the means chosen to implement that objective reasonable? In re North Carolina Pesticide Bd. File Nos. IR94-128, IR94-151, IR94-155, 349 N.C. 656, 671, 509 S.E.2d 165, 175 (1998) (internal citations omitted). In In re N.C. Pesticide Board, the court looked at the language of the challenged regulation, and from that it determined that the Board intended to protect people and the environment by creating buffer zones via the pesticide law. Id. This was a legitimate objective. Id. As to the connection between the means and end, the plaintiff was unable to prove that no reasonable conception could justify it. Id. at 672,509 S.E.2d at 176. Therefore, the regulation was upheld. In re N.C. Pesticide Board. CONCLUSION N.C. CONST. Art. I 19 ensures that all people are treated equal under the law and that the law of the land treats people reasonably through sufficient procedure and fair laws. When challenging a statute or other government action under this Constitutional provision, one can
10 draw upon both Federal and State jurisprudence in its arguments, remembering that while the Court has expressly incorporated Federal Equal Protection law into its Equal Protection Clause, it only recognizes federal due process as persuasive. Also, with substantive due process, the State courts can sometimes grant relief when the Fourteenth Amendment of the United State Constitution would not since the law of the land is not wholly the same as due process.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: LOWERING THE STANDARD OF STRICT SCRUTINY. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) Marisa Lopez *
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: LOWERING THE STANDARD OF STRICT SCRUTINY Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) Marisa Lopez * Respondents 1 adopted a law school admissions policy that considered, among other factors,
More informationGovernment Chapter 5 Study Guide
Government Chapter 5 Study Guide Civil rights Policies designed to protect people against a liberty or discriminatory treatment by government officials or individuals Two centuries of struggle Conception
More information2.2 The executive power carries out laws
Mr.Jarupot Kamklai Judge of the Phra-khanong Provincial Court Chicago-Kent College of Law #7 The basic Principle of the Constitution of the United States and Judicial Review After the thirteen colonies,
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSES IN DSS CASES
CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSES IN DSS CASES Maitri Mike Klinkosum Winston-Salem, NC The task of raising and preserving constitutional defenses is as important an endeavor in DSS cases as it is in criminal cases.
More informationFullilove v. Klutznick Preferences for everyone from Negroes to Aleuts
Fullilove v. Klutznick Preferences for everyone from Negroes to Aleuts A federal statute authorized billions to state and local governments for use in public works projects. There was of course a kicker.
More informationDue Process Clause. Both 5th and 14 th Amendment provide that: no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law
Due Process Clause Both 5th and 14 th Amendment provide that: no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law Magna Carta, Art. 39 (1215) No free man shall be taken,
More informationCh. 20. Due Process of Law. The Meaning of Due Process 1/23/2015. Due Process & Rights of the Accused
Ch. 20 Due Process & Rights of the Accused Due Process of Law How is the meaning of due process of law set out in the 5th and 14th amendments? What is police power and how does it relate to civil rights?
More informationMOTION TO DECLARE [TEEN SEX STATUTE] UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED AND TO DISMISS THE CHARGES AGAINST THE CHILD
STATE OF DISTRICT COURT DIVISION JUVENILE BRANCH IN THE MATTER OF, A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN CASE NO.: MOTION TO DECLARE [TEEN SEX STATUTE] UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED AND TO DISMISS THE CHARGES
More informationRoe v. Wade (1973) Argued: December 13, 1971 Reargued: October 11, 1972 Decided: January 22, Background
Street Law Case Summary Background Argued: December 13, 1971 Reargued: October 11, 1972 Decided: January 22, 1973 The Constitution does not explicitly guarantee a right to privacy. The word privacy does
More informationA BRIDGE TOO FAR: THE LIMITS OF THE POLITICAL PROCESS DOCTRINE IN SCHUETTE V. COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
A BRIDGE TOO FAR: THE LIMITS OF THE POLITICAL PROCESS DOCTRINE IN SCHUETTE V. COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHRISTOPHER E. D ALESSIO I. INTRODUCTION In Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative
More informationUS CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE
US CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,
More informationCivil Rights and Civil Liberties. Aren t They the Same? 7/7/2013. Guarantees of Liberties not in the Bill of Rights.
Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Day 6 PSCI 2000 Aren t They the Same? Civil Liberties: Individual freedoms guaranteed to the people primarily by the Bill of Rights Freedoms given to the nation Civil Rights:
More informationAliessa v. Novello. Touro Law Review. Diane M. Somberg. Volume 18 Number 2 New York State Constitutional Decisions: 2001 Compilation.
Touro Law Review Volume 18 Number 2 New York State Constitutional Decisions: 2001 Compilation Article 11 March 2016 Aliessa v. Novello Diane M. Somberg Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview
More informationSUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF BLADEN IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO.: MARLOWE FARM, LLC, BLADEN S ) BLOOMIN AGRI-INDUSTRIAL, INC., SIOUX ) HONEY COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION,
More informationNova Law Review. The Poor as a Suspect Class Under the Equal Protection Clause: An Open Constitutional Question. Henry Rose
Nova Law Review Volume 34, Issue 2 2015 Article 3 The Poor as a Suspect Class Under the Equal Protection Clause: An Open Constitutional Question Henry Rose Copyright c 2015 by the authors. Nova Law Review
More informationComes now the Plaintiffs through counsel seeking relief against the Defendant as set forth below: PARTIES
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE COUNTY OF WAKE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION CARLA ELKINS, MICHAEL JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT AND PETITION ) FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT NORTH
More informationChapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Opener
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Opener Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before
More informationStudy Questions. Introduction to the Constitution; mini-course on constitutional rights
Study Questions Class #1 Introduction to the Constitution; mini-course on constitutional rights Readings: Preview the course by skimming this Addendum pp. 2-3 (class schedule); casebook pp. v-xx (Table
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION
HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION PROFESSOR DELAINE R. SWENSON RIGHT OF PRIVACY n KNOWN AS THE RIGHT TO BE LET ALONE. THERE ARE SOME AREAS WHERE WE DON T WANT THE GOVERNMENT INVOLVED. n WHERE
More informationBARNEY BRITT, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant NO. COA Filed: 4 September 2007
BARNEY BRITT, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant NO. COA06-714 Filed: 4 September 2007 1. Firearms and Other Weapons -felony firearm statute--right to bear arms--rational relation--ex post
More informationGriswold. the right to. tal intrusion." wrote for nation clause. of the Fifth Amendment. clause of
1 Griswold v. Connecticut From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U..S. 479 (1965), [1] is a landmark case in the United States in which the Supreme
More informationNO. COA Filed: 2 June 2009
LULA SANDERS, CYNTHIA EURE, ANGELINE MCINERNY, JOSEPH C. MOBLEY, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. STATE PERSONNEL COMMISSION, a body politic, OFFICE OF STATE PERSONNEL,
More informationConstitutional Law Spring 2018 Hybrid A+ Answer. Part 1
Constitutional Law Spring 2018 Hybrid A+ Answer Part 1 Question #1 (a) First the Constitution requires that either 2/3rds of Congress or the State Legislatures to call for an amendment. This removes the
More informationFinal Revision, 11/7/16
Final Revision, 11/7/16 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FALL, 2016 PROFESSOR WOLF Page number xv The Constitution of the United States CHAPTER 1 THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL POWER A. The Authority for Judicial Review 1 Marbury
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC00-1194 T.M., a juvenile, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [April 26, 2001] PER CURIAM. We have for review the decision in State v. T.M., 761 So. 2d 1140 (Fla.
More informationTwo Thoughts About Obergefell v. Hodges
Two Thoughts About Obergefell v. Hodges JUSTICE JOHN PAUL STEVENS (RET.) The Supreme Court s holding in Obergefell v. Hodges 1 that the right to marry a person of the same sex is an aspect of liberty protected
More informationHeadnote: Wyvonne Lashell Gooslin v. State of Maryland, No September Term, 1998.
Headnote: Wyvonne Lashell Gooslin v. State of Maryland, No. 5736 September Term, 1998. STATES-ACTIONS-CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-LIMITATIONS ON CIVIL REMEDIES- Maryland Tort Claims Act s waiver of sovereign immunity
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Constitutional Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Paul, a student at Rural
More informationFourth Exam American Government PSCI Fall, 2001
Fourth Exam American Government PSCI 1201-001 Fall, 2001 Instructions: This is a multiple choice exam with 40 questions. Select the one response that best answers the question. True false questions should
More informationTHE 14 TH AMENDMENT and SUING LOCAL GOVERNMENT Course Policies and Syllabus MWF 9:00-9:50 Professor Sanders SYLLABUS
THE 14 TH AMENDMENT and SUING LOCAL GOVERNMENT Course Policies and Syllabus MWF 9:00-9:50 Professor Sanders SYLLABUS Course Description: The course will be divided into three sections. The first part of
More informationEquality And The Constitution
Equality And The Constitution The Declaration of Independence: all men are created equal The Constitution and slavery o whole number of free persons (Art. I, Sec. 2, cl. 3) o three fifths of all other
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Constitutional Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question The Legislature of State
More informationKey Decisions in Felony Disenfranchisement Litigation For more information, visit:
Right To Vote Key Decisions in Felony Disenfranchisement Litigation For more information, visit: www.brennancenter.org Table of Contents: I. United States Supreme Court Richardson v. Ramirez O Brien v.
More informationANSWER KEY EXPLORING CIVIL AND ECONOMIC FREEDOM DBQ: LIBERTY AND THE
ANSWER KEY EXPLORING CIVIL AND ECONOMIC FREEDOM Critical Thinking Questions 1. The Founders understood that property is the natural right of all individuals to create, obtain, and control their possessions,
More informationRights to Life, Liberty, and Property
Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property 1. Established rules and regulations that restrain those who exercise governmental power are termed a. civil rights. b. civil liberties. c. due process. d. law. 2.
More informationChapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 1
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 1 Objectives 1. Explain the meaning of due process of law as set out in the 5 th and 14 th amendments. 2. Define police power and understand
More informationA survey is distributed to teachers in a public school, asking them to identify all teachers and students who participate in any type of
THE NEED FOR BREEDLOVE IN NORTH CAROLINA: WHY NORTH CAROLINA COURTS SHOULD EMPLOY A STRICT SCRUTINY REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY CLAIMS EVEN IN WAKE OF SMITH RAGAN RIDDLE * INTRODUCTION... 247 I. A SHIFT
More informationFebruary 19, 1991 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO
ROBERT T. STEPHAN ATTORNEY GENERAL February 19, 1991 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 91-13 The Honorable Lana Oleen State Senator, Twenty-Second District State Capitol, Room 143-N Topeka, Kansas 66612 Re:
More informationUnited States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation
United States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation Class 8: The Constitution in Action Abortion Monday, December 17, 2018 Dane S. Ciolino A.R. Christovich Professor of Law Loyola University
More informationLochner & Substantive Due Process
Lochner & Substantive Due Process Lochner Era: Definition: Several controversial decisions invalidating federal and state statutes that sought to regulate working conditions during the progressive era
More informationMay 31, Gary O. Bartlett Executive Director State Board of Elections P.O. Box Raleigh, North Carolina
May 31, 2012 Gary O. Bartlett Executive Director State Board of Elections P.O. Box 27255 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7255 cc: Don Wright, General Counsel Mr. Bartlett: Re: The Use of Churches as Polling
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH, SS. SOUTHERN DISTRICT SUPERIOR COURT No. 05-E-0257 City of Nashua v. State of New Hampshire ORDER This is a Petition for a Declaratory Judgment by the City of Nashua
More informationExam. 6) The Constitution protects against search of an individual's person, home, or vehicle without
Exam MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) Civil liberties are that the government has committed to protect. A) freedoms B) property
More informationCase 2:09-cv MCE -DAD Document 72 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
Case :0-cv-0-MCE -DAD Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 ADAM RICHARDS et al., v. Plaintiffs, COUNTY OF YOLO and YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF ED PRIETO, Defendants.
More informationFEDERALISM. As a consequence, rights established under deeds, wills, contracts, and the like in one state must be recognized by other states.
FEDERALISM Federal Government: A form of government where states form a union and the sovereign power is divided between the national government and the various states. The Privileges and Immunities Clause:
More information- i - INDEX. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... iii STATEMENT OF INTEREST... 1 INTRODUCTION... 2
- i - INDEX TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... iii STATEMENT OF INTEREST... 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 I. THE SUPERIOR COURT DID NOT APPLY THE STRICT SCRUTINY ANALYSIS REQUIRED BY CONTROLLING UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
More informationORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENT
ORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENT JOHN O. MCGINNIS * & MICHAEL B. RAPPAPORT ** Although originalism has grown in popularity in recent years, the theory continues to face major criticisms. One such criticism is
More informationUCLA National Black Law Journal
UCLA National Black Law Journal Title Plyler v. Doe - Education and Illegal Alien Children Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2hz3v32w Journal National Black Law Journal, 8(1) ISSN 0896-0194 Author
More informationNovember 12, Personal and Real Property--Real Estate Brokers and Salesmen--Educational Requirements
November 12, 1981 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 81-251 Honorable David L. Webb State Representative Box 163 Stilwell, Kansas 66085 Re: Personal and Real Property--Real Estate Brokers and Salesmen--Educational
More informationSAYING NO TO MEDICAL CARE. Joseph A. Smith. The right to refuse medical treatment by competent adults is recognized throughout the
SAYING NO TO MEDICAL CARE Joseph A. Smith The right to refuse medical treatment by competent adults is recognized throughout the United States. See Cavuoto v. Buchanan Cnty. Dep t of Soc. Servs., 605 S.E.2d
More informationRace-Conscious Affirmative Action by Tax-Exempt 501(c)(3) Corporations After Grutter and Gratz
St. John's Law Review Volume 77 Issue 4 Volume 77, Fall 2003, Number 4 Article 3 February 2012 Race-Conscious Affirmative Action by Tax-Exempt 501(c)(3) Corporations After Grutter and Gratz David A. Brennan
More informationRecent Decision in Case Challenging Sex Offender Residency Regulations Yields Important Lessons
1 April 28, 2017 League-L Email Newsletter Recent Decision in Case Challenging Sex Offender Residency Regulations Yields Important Lessons By Claire Silverman, Legal Counsel, League of Wisconsin Municipalities
More informationUNWRITTEN PARK TRESPASS POLICY UNCONSTITUTIONAL
UNWRITTEN PARK TRESPASS POLICY UNCONSTITUTIONAL James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2007 James C. Kozlowski In the case of Anthony v. State, No. 06-05-00133-CR. (Tex.App. 6 th Dist. 2006), plaintiff Lamar
More informationPolitical Science Legal Studies 217
Political Science Legal Studies 217 Reading and Analyzing Cases How Does Law Influence Judicial Review? Lower courts Analogic reasoning Find cases that are close and draw parallels Supreme Court Decision
More informationBEST STAFF COMPETITION PIECE
BEST STAFF COMPETITION PIECE Constitutional Law Substantive Due Process and the Not-So Fundamental Right to Sexual Orientation Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 2472 (2003) The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
More informationNovember 28, Elections Voting Places and Materials Therefor Placement of Political Signs during Election Period; Constitutionality
November 28, 2018 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 2018-16 The Honorable Blake Carpenter State Representative, 81st District 2425 N. Newberry, Apt. 3202 Derby, Kansas 67037 Re: Elections Voting Places and
More informationRaoul Berger, Government by the Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment
Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 12 Number 3 pp.617-621 Spring 1978 Raoul Berger, Government by the Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment Thomas H. Nelson Recommended Citation
More informationAP Gov Chapter 4 Outline
AP Gov Chapter 4 Outline I. THE BILL OF RIGHTS The Bill of Rights comes from the colonists fear of a tyrannical government. Recognizing this fear, the Federalists agreed to amend the Constitution to include
More informationName: Pd: Regarding Unit 6 material, from College Board:
Name: Pd: AP Government Unit 6 (Ch. 16, 4, and 5) Study Guide 15-30% of course material and May 12, 2015 AP Exam Mastery Questions and Practice FRQs Ch. 4 & 5 DUE 4/21/15 Ch. 16 DUE 4/28/15 Regarding Unit
More informationNo. AMC3-SUP FOR THE APPELLATE MOOT COURT COLLEGIATE CHALLENGE JAMES INCANDENZA ENFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
No. AMC3-SUP 2016-37-02 FOR THE APPELLATE MOOT COURT COLLEGIATE CHALLENGE JAMES INCANDENZA Petitioner, v. ENFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Respondent. On Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh
More information1 U.S. CONST. amend. XI. The plain language of the Eleventh Amendment prohibits suits against
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW STATE EMPLOYEES HAVE PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST EMPLOYERS UNDER FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES V. HIBBS, 538 U.S. 721 (2003). The Eleventh Amendment
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN )
[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2014-Ohio-2001.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO Appellee v. C.A. Nos. 13CA010366 13CA010367 13CA010368 13CA010369
More informationLaw Related Education
Law Related Education Copyright 2006 by the Kansas Bar Association. Revised 2016. All rights reserved. No use is permitted which will infringe on the copyright w ithout the express written consent of the
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LEDUC INC., and WINDMILL POINTE INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED December 23, 2008 v No. 280921 Oakland Circuit Court CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF LYON, LC No. 2006-072901-CH
More informationChapter 11: Civil Rights
Chapter 11: Civil Rights Section 1: Civil Rights and Discrimination Section 2: Equal Justice under Law Section 3: Civil Rights Laws Section 4: Citizenship and Immigration Main Idea Reading Focus Civil
More informationPetition for Writ of Certiorari filed September 30, 1996, denied October 23, Released for Publication October 28, 1996.
1 MONTANO V. LOS ALAMOS COUNTY, 1996-NMCA-108, 122 N.M. 454, 926 P.2d 307 CHARLES MONTANO and JOE GUTIERREZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. LOS ALAMOS COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 16,982 COURT OF
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION 2005 WI APP 163 Case No.: 2004AP1771 Petition for review filed Complete Title of Case: RAINBOW SPRINGS GOLF COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. TOWN OF
More informationSPRING 2012 May 4, 2012 FINAL EXAM DO NOT GO BEYOND THIS PAGE UNTIL THE EXAM BEGINS. MAKE SURE YOUR EXAM # is included at the top of this page.
Exam # PERSPECTIVES PROFESSOR DEWOLF SPRING 2012 May 4, 2012 FINAL EXAM INSTRUCTIONS: DO NOT GO BEYOND THIS PAGE UNTIL THE EXAM BEGINS. THIS IS A CLOSED BOOK EXAM. MAKE SURE YOUR EXAM # is included at
More informationAbortion - Illinois Legislation in the Wake of Roe v. Wade
DePaul Law Review Volume 23 Issue 1 Fall 1973 Article 28 Abortion - Illinois Legislation in the Wake of Roe v. Wade Joy M. Peigen Catherine L. McCourt George Kois Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GARY KOHLMAN and ALLEN ) ROBERTS, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 08 C 5300 ) VILLAGE OF MIDLOTHIAN, THOMAS ) MURAWSKI,
More informationunderlying principle some rights are fundamental and should not be subject to majoritarian control
underlying principle some rights are fundamental and should not be subject to majoritarian control Speech, Press & Assembly CONSTITUTIONALITY: 1 st & 14 th Amendments Intended to PROTECT criticism of government
More informationConstitution Law II Spring 2019
Course Time and Location Tuesday and Thursday: 2-3:15 PM Room TBA Constitution Law II Spring 2019 Ilya Somin Professor of Law Scalia Law School George Mason University Office: Rm. 322 Ph: 703-993-8069
More informationQuestion 1. State X is the nation s largest producer of grain used for making ethanol. There are no oil wells or refineries in the state.
Question 1 A State X statute prohibits the retail sale of any gasoline that does not include at least 10 percent ethanol, an alcohol produced from grain, which, when mixed with gasoline, produces a substance
More informationDissent by Thurgood Marshall in. Beal v. Doe (1977) Marshall categorically supported a woman s control of her own body, and hence her right to
Dissent by Thurgood Marshall in Beal v. Doe (1977) Marshall categorically supported a woman s control of her own body, and hence her right to choose whether to have an abortion. He gladly joined the majority
More informationv No We took this case to consider the constitutionality of the district court judicial pension provisions of the Judges
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan 48909 Opinion Chief Justice Maura D. Corrigan Justices Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Clifford W. Taylor Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J.
More informationCOMMENTS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER: THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
COMMENTS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER: THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
More informationEqual Rights Under the Law
Equal Rights Under the Law 1. The women's suffrage movement a. preceded the campaign to abolish slavery. b. was delayed by the campaign to abolish slavery and the temperance movement. c. has been a twentieth-century
More informationSENATE BILL 752. By Beavers. WHEREAS, The Constitution of Tennessee, Article XI, 18, states the following: The
SENATE BILL 752 By Beavers AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 36, relative to the Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act. WHEREAS, The Constitution of Tennessee, Article
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 348A16. Filed 2 March Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 348A16 Filed 2 March 2018 KEVIN J. TULLY v. CITY OF WILMINGTON Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,
More informationSURROGATE S COURT OF NEW YORK BROOME COUNTY
SURROGATE S COURT OF NEW YORK BROOME COUNTY In re Guardian of Derek 1 (decided June 27, 2006) Derek s parents petitioned the Broome County Surrogate s Court to be appointed his guardian pursuant to article
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 11, 2008 Session. JOHN DOE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 11, 2008 Session JOHN DOE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 08C-359 Hon. Amanda McClendon, Judge
More informationTests and Sub Outline For Conlaw 2
Tests and Sub Outline For Conlaw 2 Rule from Slaughterhouse Cases: The 14 th Amendment guarantees the rights of the citizens of the United States, thus implicating that the 14 th covers rights and immunities
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A11-811 Douglas Benson, et al., Appellants, vs. Jill
More informationName: Pd: Regarding Unit 6 material, from College Board:
Name: Pd: AP Government Unit 6 (Ch. 4, and 5) Study Guide 15-30% of course material and May 10, 2016 AP Exam Mastery Questions and Practice FRQs Due on Tuesday 4/26/2016 Regarding Unit 6 material, from
More informationIN YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF COMPELLED PROFESSIONAL SPEECH IN STUART v. CAMNITZ. Erin K.
IN YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF COMPELLED PROFESSIONAL SPEECH IN STUART v. CAMNITZ Erin K. Phillips Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 71 II. FACTUAL
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 16 4240 LUIS SEGOVIA, et al., v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs Appellants, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United
More informationPHIL 165: FREEDOM, EQUALITY, AND THE LAW Winter 2018
PHIL 165: FREEDOM, EQUALITY, AND THE LAW Winter 2018 Professor: Samuel Rickless Office: HSS 8012 Office Hours: Mondays and Wednesdays, 11am-12pm Email: srickless@ucsd.edu Lectures: MWF 10am-10:50am, Peterson
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JOHN DOES I-IV, ) on their own behalf and on behalf ) of a class of those similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No.
More informationCAUSE NO ERICK MUNOZ, AN INDIVIDUAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT AND HUSBAND, NEXT FRIEND, OF MARLISE MUNOZ, DECEASED
096-270080-14 FILED ERICK MUNOZ, AN INDIVIDUAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT AND HUSBAND, NEXT FRIEND, OF MARLISE MUNOZ, DECEASED v. 96th TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JOHN PETER SMITH HOSPITAL, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10,
More informationUnited States District Court for the District of South Carolina Spartanburg Division
7:09-cv-01586-HMH Date Filed 11/16/09 Entry Number 34 Page 1 of 25 United States District Court for the District of South Carolina Spartanburg Division Robert Moss, individually and as ) general guardian
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 November 2017
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-367 Filed: 7 November 2017 Wake County, No. 16 CVS 15636 ROY A. COOPER, III, in his official capacity as GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff,
More informationNo. 71,606 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS. 885 S.W.2d 421. December 8, 1993, Delivered
THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. TIM CURRY, CRIMINAL DISTRICT AT- TORNEY FOR TARRANT COUNTY, RELATOR v. HON. WALLACE BOW- MAN, JUDGE COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NUMBER FOUR OF TARRANT COUNTY, RESPONDENT No. 71,606
More informationAdministrative Law--Quasi-Judicial Proceedings-- Requirements of a "Full Hearing" (Morgan v. U.S., 58 S. Ct. 773 (1938))
St. John's Law Review Volume 13, November 1938, Number 1 Article 10 Administrative Law--Quasi-Judicial Proceedings-- Requirements of a "Full Hearing" (Morgan v. U.S., 58 S. Ct. 773 (1938)) St. John's Law
More informationS17A0086. MAJOR v. THE STATE. We granted this interlocutory appeal to address whether the former 1
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: May 15, 2017 S17A0086. MAJOR v. THE STATE. HUNSTEIN, Justice. We granted this interlocutory appeal to address whether the former 1 version of OCGA 16-11-37 (a),
More informationAP US GOVERNMENT & POLITICS UNIT 6 REVIEW
AP US GOVERNMENT & POLITICS UNIT 6 REVIEW CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES Civil liberties: the legal constitutional protections against government. (Although liberties are outlined in the Bill of Rights
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 104,761. DOWNTOWN BAR AND GRILL, LLC, Appellee, STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 104,761 DOWNTOWN BAR AND GRILL, LLC, Appellee, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. discretion. An appellate court reviews the grant or
More informationDistrict Court, Suffolk County New York, People v. NYTAC Corp.
Touro Law Review Volume 21 Number 1 New York State Constitutional Decisions: 2004 Compilation Article 15 December 2014 District Court, Suffolk County New York, People v. NYTAC Corp. Maureen Fitzgerald
More informationJudgment Rendered DEe
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2009 CA 0800 CREIG AND DEBBIE MENARD INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR SON GILES MENARD VERSUS LOUISIANA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION Judgment
More informationWilliams Mullen, by Camden R. Webb, Esq. and Elizabeth C. Stone, Esq., for Plaintiff.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF DARE 13 CVS 388 MELVIN L. DAVIS, JR. and ) J. REX DAVIS, ) Plaintiffs ) v. ) OPINION AND ORDER ) DOROTHY C. DAVIS
More informationIntroductory Terms/Concepts, Text of the EPC, Early Cases: Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Fromm Institute for Lifelong Learning/Fall 2016 Carcieri/Great Equal Protection Cases Session One: Introduction, Part One Introductory Terms/Concepts, Text of the EPC, Early Cases: Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)
More information