Ninth Circuit Addresses Application of Foreign Sovereign Immunity Waiver Exception to Domestic Side Trip During International Travel
|
|
- Leslie Walker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 JUNE 25, 2004 Ninth Circuit Addresses Application of Foreign Sovereign Immunity Waiver Exception to Domestic Side Trip During International Travel In Coyle v. P. T. Garuda Indonesia, 1 a case that arose out of the death of two U.S. passengers in the crash of an Indonesian domestic flight, the Ninth Circuit addressed an interesting intersection of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ( FSIA ) 2 and the Warsaw Convention. 3 The court ordered the case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court held that the foreign sovereign immunity of the Indonesian state-owned airline, Garuda Indonesia, had not been waived and that the commercial activities exception to immunity was not applicable because the passengers purchased their tickets in Indonesia as a side-trip separate from their transportation from the United States to Indonesia, which had been purchased in the United States. 4 As is required of foreign airlines flying to the United States, Garuda Indonesia had obtained a foreign air carrier operating permit, which expressly provided for a waiver of sovereign immunity. Garuda Indonesia s permit extended the waiver to, among other things, any claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any Court or other Tribunal of the United States. 5 The court s analysis of whether Garuda Indonesia had waived its foreign sovereign immunity turned on whether the Warsaw Convention made the claim F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2004) U.S.C. 1330, 1391, 1441, 1602, et seq. 3. The Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air ( Warsaw Convention ). 49 U.S.C note. 4. Id. at Id. at of 5
2 cognizable in U.S. courts and, thus, made the immunity waiver clause applicable. 6 The Warsaw Convention applies only to international transportation and provides that a claim brought under it may be brought in the courts of a Convention signatory nation that is the carrier s domicile, its principal place of business, where it has a place of business through which the contract of carriage was made, or the place of destination of the international travel. 7 Because none of the other clauses of Article 28(1) was applicable, the issue came down to whether the passengers place of destination was in the United States. Whether a case arises from international transportation and what is the ultimate destination of that transport under the Convention are not determined solely by reference to the origin and destination of a particular flight segment. On the contrary, Article 1(3) of the Convention provides that: Transportation to be performed by several successive air carriers shall be deemed, for the purposes of this convention, to be one undivided transportation, if it has been regarded by the parties as a single operation, whether it has been agreed upon under the form of a single contract or of a series of contracts, and it shall not lose its international character merely because one contract or a series of contracts is to be performed entirely within a territory subject to the sovereignty, suzerainty, mandate, or authority of the same [Convention signatory nation]. 8 Accordingly, whether the subject flight qualified as international transportation and whether the United States was the passengers ultimate destination at the time of the crash and thus whether the Convention applied and whether the Convention made a suit cognizable in the United States were both determined on the basis of whether the international transportation to Indonesia and the subsequent flight within Indonesia were parts of a single operation. 9 This determination is made based on the objective, rather than the subjective, intent of the parties and by reference to the expression of the parties intent in the contract of transportation, i.e., the ticket. 10 In the Coyle case, the passengers had purchased round-trip tickets from a travel agent in Oregon before flying to Indonesia. 11 After arriving in Indonesia and two months after their original ticket purchase, the passengers, using Indonesian currency, bought additional tickets for round-trip travel between destinations within Indonesia. 12 The court distinguished cases where several tickets are purchased at once and/or where the different tickets make reference to each other or to a larger itinerary and rejected the plaintiff s speculation that the airline must have checked the passengers identification when it sold them tickets in 6. Id. at Id. at 986 (citing Warsaw Convention, Article 28(1)). 8. Id. at 986 (emphasis original, quoting Warsaw Convention Article 1(3)). 9. Id. at Id. at Id. at Id. at of 5
3 Indonesia and would have known that the American passengers would eventually be returning to the United States. 13 The court concluded that: the objective evidence in this case unambiguously signifies the parties mutual intent: that the Badens flight to Medan was a side-trip, unconnected to their larger international itinerary, and beyond the waiver made in Garuda s USDOT permit. 14 The court also rejected the plaintiff s argument that the commercial activities exception to foreign sovereign immunities applied. The court found that the required nexus between the commercial activities and the United States was lacking for the accident in Indonesia during a flight between places in Indonesia pursuant to tickets purchased in Indonesia. The nexus could not be provided by the sale of the original tickets in Oregon since, as the court had already held, the accident flight was not part of the international transportation contracted for in the original tickets. 15 Finding no exception to foreign sovereign immunity, the Ninth Circuit directed the district court to dismiss the action for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Other FSIA Developments Since Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson The most significant recent decision under the FSIA was the Supreme Court s 2003 decision in Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson. 16 In that case the Court held that in order for a corporate entity to be an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state under the FSIA by virtue of state ownership, a majority of its shares must be directly held by the foreign government (with no intervening layers of corporate ownership) at the time the suit is filed. 17 This holding was particularly significant because most prior authority had allowed indirect tiered ownership and had considered ownership at the time of the acts sued on, not just at the time the suit was filed. In addition to Coyle, the following cases have also shed some light on the law of foreign sovereign immunity since Dole: In USX Corporation v. Adriatic Insurance Company, 345 F.3d 190 (3d Cir. 2003), a third-party defendant insurer indirectly owned and controlled by the government of Ireland had removed the case to federal court, originally claiming that it was an agency or 13. Id. at , Id. at Id. at U.S. 468, 123 S. Ct (2003) ( Dole ). Most other recent case authorities decided under the FSIA have dealt with the retroactive application of the FSIA and its expropriation exception to Nazi-era claims, e.g., Republic of Austria v. Altmann, 124 S. Ct (2004), to the torture and terrorism exceptions, or to other areas equally unlikely to impact claims against state-owned aviation entities. 17. Id. at 123 S. Ct of 5
4 instrumentality of a foreign state on the basis of Ireland s indirect ownership. 18 After the Supreme Court s decision in Dole, denial of a motion to remand was upheld on the basis that it was an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state because of its status as an organ of the Irish government. 19 This holding may greatly decrease the impact of Dole on corporations indirectly owned by foreign governments. The court considered the following seven factors in reaching this determination: (1) the circumstances surrounding the entity s creation; (2) the purpose of its activities; (3) the degree of supervision by the government; (4) the level of government financial support; (5) the entity s employment policies, particularly regarding whether the foreign state requires the hiring of public employees and pays their salaries; (6) the entity s obligations and privileges under the foreign state s laws [and] (7) the ownership structure of the entity. 20 Under the last of these factors, the fact that an entity is indirectly owned by a foreign state, while not adequate to support a claim to be an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state by virtue of ownership, is a factor weighing in favor of that status as an organ of the foreign government. 21 Significant weight was given to a governmental purpose of the government in taking indirect ownership of the entity under the first two factors, which will probably be present in almost every such entity. 22 If the organ determination is made in the same way by other courts, many companies, including state-owned airlines, that are indirectly owned by foreign governments may still be able to claim the privileges of the FSIA by claiming to be organs of their governments, despite the Supreme Court s holding in Dole. In I.T. Consultants, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 23 the D.C. Circuit decided an issue raised, but not decided, by the Supreme Court in Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.: 24 whether a foreign state is a person entitled to the protections of the Fifth Amendment, including the requirement that a person have minimum contacts with a forum before a court of that forum can assert personal jurisdiction over that person. The D.C. Circuit held that the Fifth Amendment and the minimum contacts requirement are inapplicable to a foreign government, but are applicable to an official of that government Id. at Id. at Id. at Id. at Id. at F.3d 1184 (D.C. Cir. 2003) U.S. 607, 619 (1992). 25. I.T. Consultants, 351 F.3d at (affirming denial of dismissal of claims against Pakistan, while reversing denial of dismissal of claims against Pakistani official). 4 of 5
5 For more information on this issue or other aviation matters, please contact: Brian C. Dalrymple at (415) Stephen C. Johnson at (415) Hugh R. Koss at (415) Kyle Levine at (415) Donald B. MacDougall at (516) Domenico Perrella at (415) William L. Robinson at (949) Eric Strain at (415) Christopher D. Thomas (585) Lori Winfree at (949) of 5
2006 FNC Update. By: Andy Payne. PayneLawGroup
2006 FNC Update By: Andy Payne Forum Non Conveniens Update FNC Availability under Warsaw Convention FNC Availability under Montreal Convention Determination of SMJ and FNC Side Trips & FNC Alternative
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Order 2013-4-5 Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 8 th day of February, 2013 Served: April
More informationThe Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
MARCH 2005 The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Assessing the Immunity of Foreign States in U.S. Litigation By Hugh R. Koss, Brooke C. Galardi, and Eric B. Strain The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of
More informationYear in Review: Three Noteworthy Decisions of 2017 under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
LITIGATION CLIENT ALERT JANUARY 2018 Year in Review: Three Noteworthy Decisions of 2017 under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act In the United States, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) governs
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Order 2014-7-20 Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 27 th day of May, 2014 Served: July 29,
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Order 2016-12-21 Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 23 rd day of December, 2016 Served: December
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Order 2007-11-3 Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 5 th day of November, 2007 Served: November
More informationORDER GRANTING EXEMPTION AND TO SHOW CAUSE
Order 2011-12-20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 23rd day of December, 2011 Served: December
More informationCase: 5:06-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 489 Filed: 06/26/07 Page: 1 of 16 - Page ID#: <pageid>
Case: 5:06-cv-00316-KSF-REW Doc #: 489 Filed: 06/26/07 Page: 1 of 16 - Page ID#: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION (MASTER FILE) NO. 5:06-CV-316
More informationORDER GRANTING EXEMPTION AND TO SHOW CAUSE
Order 2016-11-17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 22 nd day of November, 2016 Served: November
More informationIn Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001: Claims Against Saudi Defendants Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)
: Claims Against Saudi Defendants Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney January 22, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34726 Summary
More informationCase 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Case No.
Case 3:18-cv-01628-SB Document 1 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 9 Christine N. Moore, OSB#060270 Landye Bennett Blumstein, LLP 1300 Southwest Fifth Avenue, Suite 3600 (503) 224-4100 cmoore@lbblawyers.com Of
More informationCRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS22094 Updated April 4, 2005 Summary Lawsuits Against State Supporters of Terrorism: An Overview Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No.
Case: 12-14171 Date Filed: 03/11/2013 Page: 1 of 6 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-14171 Non-Argument Calendar D. C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-22097-PCH
More informationTUI AIRLINES BELGIUM N.V. d/b/a JETAIRFLY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Order 2008-6-13 Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 10 th day of June, 2008 Served: June 10,
More informationInternational Litigation and Arbitration: Practice and Planning
International Litigation and Arbitration: Practice and Planning Sixth Edition 2011 SUPPLEMENT Russell J. Weintraub Professor of Law and Holder of Powell Chair Emeritus University of Texas School of Law
More informationDownloaded on April 16, Region. Sub Subject Conventions Reference Number
Downloaded on April 16, 2019 Convention, Supplementary to the Warsaw Convention, for the Unification of Certains Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air Performed by a Person Other than the Contracting
More informationThe Convention which the provisions of the present Chapter modify is the Warsaw Convention as amended at The Hague in 1955.
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL No.2 AMEND THE CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATION TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, SIGNED AT WARSAW ON 12 OCTOBER 1929, AS AMENDED BY THE PROTOCOL DONE AT THE
More informationThe Struggle to Preserve Tribal Sovereignty in Alabama David Smith Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP. Introduction
The Struggle to Preserve Tribal Sovereignty in Alabama David Smith Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP Introduction Over the last decade, the state of Alabama, including the Alabama Supreme Court, has
More informationCONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, SIGNED AT WARSAW ON 12 OCTOBER 1929 ( WARSAW CONVENTION)
CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, SIGNED AT WARSAW ON 12 OCTOBER 1929 CHAPTER I SCOPE DEFINITIONS Article 1 ( WARSAW CONVENTION) 1. This Convention
More informationThe Montreal Convention's Statute of Limitations - A Failed Attempt at Consistency
Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 80 2015 The Montreal Convention's Statute of Limitations - A Failed Attempt at Consistency Allison Stewart Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES SPRING TERM, 2010 DOCKET NO ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES SPRING TERM, 2010 DOCKET NO. 08-8888 MEPHISTO VALENTIN, Petitioner, v. JANE MARGARETE and JOHN WERTHER, Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
More informationArticle I. Article II
CONVENTION SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE WARSAW CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR PERFORMED BY A PERSON OTHER THAN THE CONTRACTING CARRIER, SIGNED IN GUADALAJARA,
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JENNY RUBIN, DEBORAH RUBIN,
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Communities
L 194/39 CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES FOR INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR THE STATES PARTIES TO THIS CONVENTION, RECOGNIZING the significant contribution of the Convention for the Unification
More informationCase 1:04-cv GBD-RLE Document 657 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:04-cv-00397-GBD-RLE Document 657 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------ x MARK I. SOKOLOW, et al., usdc,,. ~C'.El
More informationCARGO CHARTER GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
CARGO CHARTER GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1. In these Cargo Charter Terms and Conditions capitalised words and expressions have the meanings set out for them below: Cargo Charter Summary
More informationDOT's Show Cause Order : A Case Study of An Overzealous Government Effort to Expand United States Jurisdiction over Foreign Air Carriers
Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 52 1986 DOT's Show Cause Order 86-1-38: A Case Study of An Overzealous Government Effort to Expand United States Jurisdiction over Foreign Air Carriers Roy J. Rafols
More informationOne-Year Review of CAFA
MARCH 8, 2006 One-Year Review of CAFA The Class Action Fairness Act ( CAFA ) was enacted by Congress last year to address what Congress called problems and abuses in class action cases. CAFA sought to
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS
Case: 15-36003, 09/19/2016, ID: 10127799, DktEntry: 26, Page 1 of 14 Docket No. 15-36003 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit GLENN EAGLEMAN, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROCKY
More informationThe Convention which the provisions of the present Chapter modify is the Warsaw Convention, 1929.
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL No. 1 TO AMEND CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, SIGNED AT WARSAW ON 12 OCTOBER 1929, SIGNED AT MONTREAL, ON 25 SEPTEMBER 1975
More informationJournal of Air Law and Commerce
Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 72 2007 Airline Liability - The Warsaw Convention - Fifth Circuit Rules That Holding a Passenger's Baggage for Ransom Is Not Actionable under the Warsaw Convention:
More informationCase 1:14-cv ARR-SMG Document 44 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 271
Case 114-cv-02505-ARR-SMG Document 44 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID # 271 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationPUBLISH TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellees, No
PUBLISH FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit September 19, 2007 Elisabeth A. Shumaker UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT MINER ELECTRIC, INC.; RUSSELL E. MINER, v.
More informationThe Hegemonic Arbitrator Replaces Foreign Sovereignty: A Comment on Chevron v. Republic of Ecuador
Arbitration Law Review Volume 8 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 10 5-1-2016 The Hegemonic Arbitrator Replaces Foreign Sovereignty: A Comment on Chevron v. Republic of Ecuador Camille Hart
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 538 U. S. (2003) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationCase 3:10-cv BR Document 123 Filed 11/15/13 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 2969
Case 3:10-cv-00750-BR Document 123 Filed 11/15/13 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 2969 STUART F. DELERY Assistant Attorney General DIANE KELLEHER Assistant Branch Director AMY POWELL amy.powell@usdoj.gov LILY FAREL
More informationPhilip Burg v. US Dept Health and Human Servi
2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-21-2010 Philip Burg v. US Dept Health and Human Servi Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No.
More informationForeign Contractor And Subcontractor Claims Against The United States Government Part One
Foreign Contractor And Subcontractor Claims Against The United States Government Part One by John B. Tieder, Jr., Senior Partner, Paul A. Varela, Senior Partner, and David B. Wonderlick, Partner Watt Tieder
More informationGARA DOING ITS JOB. By: Bruce R. Wildermuth
GARA DOING ITS JOB By: Bruce R. Wildermuth In the early 1990 s, the lead counsel of a general aviation aircraft manufacturer made the following statement while tort reform legislation was being proposed
More informationArticle 22 of the Convention shall be deleted and replaced by the following:-
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL No. 3 TO AMEND THE CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, SIGNED AT WARSAW ON 12 OCTOBER 1929, AS AMENDED BY THE PROTOCOL DONE AT
More informationBefore: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE and TATEL, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by GINSBURG, Chief Judge.
332 F3d 679 Hwang Geum Joo v. Japan 332 F.3d 679 HWANG GEUM JOO, et al., Appellants, v. JAPAN, Minister Yohei Kono, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Appellee. No. 01-7169. United States Court of Appeals, District
More informationCONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES FOR INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR
CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES FOR INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR THE STATES PARTIES TO THIS CONVENTION RECOGNIZING the significant contribution of the Convention for the Unification of
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: February 18, 2016 Decided: July 29, 2016) Docket No.
0 cv Guerra v. Shanahan et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 01 (Argued: February 1, 01 Decided: July, 01) Docket No. 1 0 cv DEYLI NOE GUERRA, AKA DEYLI NOE GUERRA
More informationCase 5:10-cv HRL Document 65 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-HRL Document Filed 0// Page of 0 E-filed 0//0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 HAYLEY HICKCOX-HUFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. US AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case
More informationNO IN THE FLYING J INC., KYLE KEETON, RESPONDENT S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
NO. 05-1550 IN THE FLYING J INC., v. KYLE KEETON, Petitioner, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit RESPONDENT S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
More informationcv (L), cv (XAP) Anglo-Iberia v. Lodderhose
08-2666-cv (L), 08-2836-cv (XAP) Anglo-Iberia v. Lodderhose UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2009 5 (Argued: October 27, 2009 Decided: March 29, 200) 6 Docket Nos.
More informationThe Convention which the provisions of the present Chapter modify is the Warsaw Convention as amended at The Hague in 1955.
PROTOCOL TO AMEND THE CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, SIGNED AT WARSAW ON 12 OCTOBER 1929, AS AMENDED BY THE PROTOCOL DONE AT HE HAGUE ON 28 SEPTEMBER
More informationNO IN THE. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit PETITIONERS REPLY
NO. 11-221 IN THE DON DIFIORE, LEON BAILEY, RITSON DESROSIERS, MARCELINO COLETA, TONY PASUY, LAWRENCE ALLSOP, CLARENCE JEFFREYS, FLOYD WOODS, and ANDREA CONNOLLY, Petitioners, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,
More informationTHE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Elizabeth Defeis" The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) was enacted in 1976 and provides the sole basis for obtaining jurisdiction
More informationHolocaust Art Restitution Litigation in 2009
Winter 2010:: Volume 05 Holocaust Art Restitution Litigation in 2009 By Yael Weitz Introduction Several Holocaust-era art restitution cases decided in 2009 brought to the forefront the myriad of issues
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-842 In the Supreme Court of the United States REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, v. Petitioner NML CAPITAL, LTD., Respondent On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
More informationFORUM NON CONVENIENS IN FOREIGN AIR CARRIER LITIGATION: By Alan H. Collier 1
FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN FOREIGN AIR CARRIER LITIGATION: A SUSTAINED RESPONSE TO AN EVOLVING PLAINTIFFS STRATEGY By Alan H. Collier 1 Regardless of where an airplane crash occurs be it a runway in Taiwan
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WEST LINN CORPORATE PARK L.L.C., v. Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 05-36061
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 13-30600 Document: 00512761577 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 9, 2014 FERRARA
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 05-85 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States POWEREX CORP., Petitioner, v. RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of
More informationCase 2:16-cv CW Document 85 Filed 02/17/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:16-cv-00579-CW Document 85 Filed 02/17/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, et al.,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 16-534 In the Supreme Court of the United States JENNY RUBIN, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-60355 Document: 00513281865 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Summary Calendar EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, Custodian, FBO Jean K. Thoden IRA
More informationPetitioners, 10 Civ (KMW) (DCF) -against- OPINION and ORDER GOVERNMENT OF THE LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, Respondent.
Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. Ltd. et al v. Government of the LAO People...9;s Democratic Republic Doc. 262 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationpìéêéãé=`çìêí=çñ=íüé=råáíéç=pí~íéë=
No. 12-842 IN THE pìéêéãé=`çìêí=çñ=íüé=råáíéç=pí~íéë= REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, v. NML CAPITAL, LTD., Petitioner, Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For
More informationSTATE IMMUNITY AND THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
STATE IMMUNITY AND THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS by JURGEN^ROHMER Europa Institute, UAiversity of Saarland, Saarbriicken, Germany MARTINUS NIJHOFF PUBLISHERS THE HAGUE / BOSTON / LONDON PREFACE ABBREVIATIONS
More informationStanding. Carpenters Industrial Council v. Zinke, 854 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (Kavanaugh, J.).
May 31, 2017 Standing. Carpenters Industrial Council v. Zinke, 854 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (Kavanaugh, J.). Standing; Direct Review of Actions Under More Than One Statute, But Only One Statute Provides
More informationIn Doe v. Etihad Airways, P.J.S.C., the U.S. Court of
Mental Distress for Airline Lawyers: The Sixth Circuit s Decision in Doe v. Etihad By David M. Krueger In Doe v. Etihad Airways, P.J.S.C., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit radically altered
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 17-387 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE, v. Petitioner, SHARLINE LUNDGREN AND RAY LUNDGREN, Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2079 ALLFREIGHT WORLDWIDE CARGO, INC., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES ENTERPRISE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from
More informationA (800) (800)
No. 17-2 In the Supreme Court of the United States UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
More informationAssignment. Federal Question Jurisdiction. Text Problem Case: Louisville and Nashville Railroad v. Mottley
Assignment Federal Question Jurisdiction Text... 1-5 Problem.... 6-7 Case: Louisville and Nashville Railroad v. Mottley... 8-10 Statutes: 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1442(a), 1257 Federal Question Jurisdiction 28
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 16-334 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States BANK MELLI, v. Petitioner, MICHAEL BENNETT, et al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the
More informationNo toe ~upreme (~ourt of toe ~tnite~ ~i, tate~ PLACER DOME, INC. AND BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION,
Supreme Court, U.S. - FILED No. 09-944 SEP 3-2010 OFFICE OF THE CLERK toe ~upreme (~ourt of toe ~tnite~ ~i, tate~ PLACER DOME, INC. AND BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION, Petitioners, Vo PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LUMMI NATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS SAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, ET AL.
No. 05-445 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LUMMI NATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. SAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationThe Warsaw Convention and the C.I.T.E.J.A.
Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 6 Issue 1 Article 4 1935 The Warsaw Convention and the C.I.T.E.J.A. Stephen Latchford Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended
More informationPROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE EUROPEAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE ORGANIZATION (EUTELSAT)
PROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE EUROPEAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE ORGANIZATION (EUTELSAT) - 1 - PROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE EUROPEAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 16-534 In the Supreme Court of the United States JENNY RUBIN, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationMEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT S MOTION FOR A PERMANENT ORDER OF DETENTION
DMB:JPL/MSA F.#2011R00783 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Cr. No. 11-623 (JG) - against - AGRON HASBAJRAMI, Defendant.
More informationWaiver of Liability Clauses for Personal Injuries in Railroad Free Passes
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 22, Issue 1 (1961) 1961 Waiver of Liability Clauses for Personal Injuries
More informationCopyright 1975 Multilateral
Additional Protocol No. 1 to Amend Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage By Air Signed At Warsaw on 12 October 1929, Signed at Montreal, on 25 September 1975
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 03 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALFONSO W. JANUARY, an individual, No. 12-56171 and Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationCONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES FOR INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR
[ ENGLISH TEXT TEXTE ANGLAIS ] CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES FOR INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR The States Parties to this Convention Recognizing the significant contribution of the Convention
More informationCARRIAGE BY AIR ACT NO. 17 OF 1946
CARRIAGE BY AIR ACT NO. 17 OF 1946 [ASSENTED TO 8 MAY, 1946] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 22 MARCH, 1955] (Afrikaans text signed by the Governor-General) This Act has been updated to Government Gazette 30070
More informationCase3:11-cv JW Document14 Filed08/29/11 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-00-JW Document Filed0// Page of 0 Robert A. Rosette (CA SBN ) Richard J. Armstrong (CA SBN ) Nicole St. Germain (CA SBN ) ROSETTE, LLP Attorneys at Law Blue Ravine Rd., Suite Folsom, CA 0 () -0
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
NO. 14-1206 In the Supreme Court of the United States PETER GEORGE ODHIAMBO, Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF KENYA, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv MGC. versus
Case: 13-14953 Date Filed: 05/07/2015 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-14953 D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-23983-MGC NELSON J. MEZERHANE, versus Plaintiff
More informationGalanda Broadman, PLLC, Occasional Paper
Galanda Broadman, PLLC, Occasional Paper No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Personal Liability Exposure for Tribal Officials in the Wake of Maxwell v. County of San Diego By Scott Wheat and Amber Penn-Roco
More informationCase 2:17-cv RBS-DEM Document 21 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 175
Case 2:17-cv-00302-RBS-DEM Document 21 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 175 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division MATTHEW HOWARD, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- OBB PERSONENVERKEHR AG,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 31, 2001 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 31, 2001 Session ORION PACIFIC, INC. v. EXCHANGE PLASTICS COMPANY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 43504 Robert E. Corlew,
More informationThe Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: 2009 Year in Review
00012340566124789 4 8 8 8 508 43 8 8 8 3 2 248 8 4 8 5658 8 3 58 4 8 8 2 43 58 8 4 4 8 8!3 56 The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: 2009 Year in Review by Crowell & Moring LLP * Table of Contents Introduction:
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 16-534 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JENNY RUBIN, DEBORAH
More informationNo. SC-CV SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION. GWENDOLENE BEGAY, Appellant,
No. SC-CV-44-08 SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION GWENDOLENE BEGAY, Appellant, v. NAVAJO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY and THE NAVAJO NATION, Appellees. OPINION Before YAZZIE, H., Chief Justice
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Order 2017-7-6 Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 14 th day of July, 2017 Served: July 14,
More informationNo AUSTRALIA, BELGIUM, BRAZIL, BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC, REPUBLIC OF CHINA, etc.
AUSTRALIA, BELGIUM, BRAZIL, BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC, REPUBLIC OF CHINA, etc. Convention, Supplementary to the War saw Convention, for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to Interna
More informationAltmann v. Austria and the Retroactivity of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2005 Altmann v. Austria and the Retroactivity of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Carlos Manuel Vázquez Georgetown University Law Center,
More informationCase 3:15-cv JAG Document 13 Filed 02/24/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Case 3:15-cv-01771-JAG Document 13 Filed 02/24/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO RONALD R. HERRERA-GOLLO, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL NO. 15-1771 (JAG) SEABORNE
More informationA (800) (800)
No. 15-410 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NELSON J. MEZERHANE, v. Petitioner, REPÚBLICA BOLIVARIANA DE VENEZUELA, FONDO DE PROTECCIÓN SOCIAL DE LOS DEPÓSSITOS BANCARIOS, AND SUPERINTENDENCIA
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit STEPHEN F. EVANS, ROOF N BOX, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, DBA GAF-ELK CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
More informationAGCC/LAC NEW CASES OF INTEREST. (January 12 through February 6, 2004)
AGCC/LAC NEW CASES OF INTEREST (January 12 through February 6, 2004) Prepared by Aaron P. Silberman Rogers Joseph O Donnell & Phillips 311 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Tel. (415) 956-2828
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ELTON LOUIS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 08-C-558 STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE COMMUNITY, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Elton Louis filed this action
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Case 4:15-cv-00028-BMM Document 55 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION TERRYL T. MATT, CV 15-28-GF-BMM Plaintiff, vs. ORDER UNITED
More informationDEON ERIC COUPLIN OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE G. STEVEN AGEE June 9, 2005 AUBREY GILL PAYNE, JR.
PRESENT: All the Justices DEON ERIC COUPLIN OPINION BY v. Record No. 041985 JUSTICE G. STEVEN AGEE June 9, 2005 AUBREY GILL PAYNE, JR. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY R. Terrence Ney, Judge Deon
More information