Below-the-Elbow Arm Amputation (BEA) Research Total Award $ Outcome Case Category Subcategory Facts
|
|
- Thomasine Greene
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Below-the-Elbow Arm Amputation (BEA) Research Total Award $ Outcome Case Category Subcategory Facts $ 10,000, Settlement MVA Rear-End $ 875, Settlement Utility Company Negligence Failure to Respond $ 2,650, Plaintiff Products Liability Washing Machine $ - Defendant Electric Shock Construction Site Plaintiff suffered 3rd/4th degree burns over 55% of her body resulting in the amputation of R, mid-forearm when her vehicle was struck from the rear by a vehicle, operated by the male defendant, while within the scope of his employment with the co-defendant company. The plaintiff's vehicle burst into flames. Plaintiff suffered R arm amputation below the elbow and amputation of 3 fingers on L hand after the bucket of a backhoe in which he was riding touched an energized power line which the defendant City of Lakeland failed to deactivate. The plaintiff also sued an engineering and architectural firm hired by the defendant to supervise the project and the general contactor's project supervisor. Defendant's attorney claimed that defendants denied any responsibility and were not admitting liability in settling. Plaintiff suffered the below-elbow amputation of her arm when it was caught in defendant's washing machine. The plaintiff alleged that her laundry suddenly popped out of the machine and when she attempted to put it back in, the machine started again. Her arm became tangled in the machine and was ripped off. The defendant's insurance company refused to pay because they claimed the laundromat was not a part of the defendant's policy. Plaintiff was working on a building standing on a scaffold when a co-worker struck a power line maintained and owned by the defendant. The power line was over 6ft away and was struck w/ a piece of rebar. The strike resulted in the plaintiff receiving a below-elbow amputation of L and R hands and 4th degree burns. The defendant alleged that the construction crew was warned about the powerlines and that plaintiff was responsible for his own safety on the worksite.
2 $ 845, Plaintiff Premises Liability Fall in Restaurant Negligent Vehicle $ 7,250, Settlement Transportation Industry Operation $ 928, Settlement MVA Pedestrian Plaintiff suffered partial R arm amputation when he slipped on a wet floor while exiting the defendant restaurant and his arm went through a glass door/window. The plaintiff contended that the threw his arm in the air to break his fall. Defendant contended that plaintiff's prior drug and alcohol abuse was the main cause of the accident and that the plaintiff had a.032 BAC at the time of the accident. Plaintiff suffered a below-the-elbow amputation of L arm, multiple finger amputations on R hand, abdominal trauma w/ internal bleeding and a required bowel resection, and emotional distress from a loss in quality of life when he was crushed in between two trailers after he was struck by the codefendant's truck, subcontracted by 4th-named defendant and operated by defendant, while the plaintiff attempted to unlock a loaded trailer in the course and scope of his employment w/ nonparty employer at 3rd-named defendant's facility. The plaintiff contended that the defendant operated the truck in a negligent manner, failed to keep a proper lookout, backed to truck when it was unsafe to do so, and negligently caused his permanent injuries. The plaintiff further contended that co- and 4th-named defendants were liable under doctrine of respondeat superior, and that 3rd-named defendant negligently required its security guards to position themselves behind trucks in order to unlock trailers. Minor plaintiff suffered partial loss of an arm, neuropsych injuries, and a leg injury when he was struck by a garbage truck owned by the defendant and operated by male co-defendant. The plaintiff clamed that the codefendant operated the truck in a negligent manner. Defendants contended that plaintiff parents were negligent in failing to supervise their child properly.
3 $ 1,182, CN: Plaintiff 50%; Defendant 50% Railroad Accident N/a Defendant CSX Transportation was the owner of a train operated by defendant operator who was acting in scope/course of employment as a CSX engineer when plaintiff, who laid across the tracks, was hit by the train causing injuries including BEA. Defendants alleged that plaintiff was negligent for failing to look out for his own safety, that plaintiff was injured while trespassing on defendant's property, and that plaintiff had a BAC of.203 at the time of accident and that he was asleep/passed out. Plaintiff denied intoxication and claimed he was beaten up by a fellow transient. $ 500, CN: Plaintiff 60%; Defendant 40% Railroad Accident Pedestrian Judgment reduced to $200,000 for CN. Plaintiff suffered BEA and other injuries when he was run over by the defendant railroad company's train. The plaintiff claimed that he had been sitting on a crossrail behind his house to vomit after drinking. The defendant train engineer contended that he saw the plaintiff at 500ft but only recognized him as human at 300ft. Plaintiff claimed defendant failed to stop at adequate distance. $ - Defendant Workplace Safety Electric Shock Plaintiff was an electrician working for an energy group who was working with defendant company to install animal mitigation equipment. Before the installation began, plaintiff temporarily de-energized 1/2 of the station so that the defendant's employee could safely install equipment without interrupting electric service to customers. Plaintiff then climbed a ladder, which he claimed was mistakenly placed against an energized breaker by the defendant's employee, and was shocked by a 13,000 volt line. Plaintiff sued defendant for workplace negligence because the defendant's employee knew, or should have known, that the breaker was still active and that he failed to warn of the situation. Defense counsel claimed that plaintiff, as lead energy company employee, was in charge of jobsite safety and that he failed to follow established safety protocols by failing to test the line for voltage and failing to barricade or isolate a safe work area w/ safety tape, cones, or flags.
4 $ 2,747, CN: Plaintiff 5%; Defendant 95% Truck Accident Backing Collision Plaintiff suffered injuries including BEA w/ several surgeries and physical therapy when her vehicle was struck by defendant's garbage truck, operated by a non-party employee, as hr backed the truck from a cross street into the plaintiff's lane of travel at an intersection. Plaintiff contended that defendant's employee operated the truck in a negligent manner, failed to keep a proper lookout, and failed to yield RoW. The defendant admitted liability, contended that plaintiff failed to keep a proper lookout, failed to wear her seatbelt and was comparatively negligent. $ 1,000, CN: Plaintiff 82.5%; Defendant 17.5% Products Liability Granulator Plaintiff was operating a granulator and robot arm when he was injured as the robot arm failed to release a runner when positioned over the granulator. Plaintiff claimed defendant designed and manufactured the Auger Feed Granulator which was allegedly dangerous by virtue of its design and manufacture, in that the granulator allowed inadvertent access by one standing contiguous with the granulator into the auger and there was not proper protection. Defendant claimed that the plaintiff failed to abide by his training and guarding which had bee supplied by his trainer, that the granulator was a component of the robotic system and fully complied w/ all industry requirements, and that plaintiff caused his own injury. Plaintiff claimed an 85% partial permanent impairment to his non-dominant extremity and 5% to the whole body. $ 3,000, Settlement Employee Safety Slip Plaintiff was unloading containers from a cargo plane when he slipped, fell in hydraulic fluid. As a result, he suffered injury to the nerves and muscles of R shoulder that developed into Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome. He then lost all function in dominant arm and req. amputation of the hand.
5 $ - Defendant Vehicle Negligence Sole Vehicle $ 1,500, Settlement Employer Negligence Shipping Employee $ 500, Settlement Med Mal Hand Amputation Defendant was operating an airboat on land when the boat came into contact w/ plaintiff causing the amputation of plaintiff's L hand/ Plaintiff filed suit against defendant alleging defendant negligently failed to properly maintain the airboat by utilizing a cage around the propeller, maintained the hill w/ an insufficiently slick surface and placed the air foils/ rudder of the airboat w/o proper mounting or adjustment. The plaintiff further claimed that the defendant failed to properly operate the boat by using it despite the fact that it was improperly maintained and turning it so sharply as to come into contact w/ the plaintiff. Plaintiff suffered hand amputation when her hand was crushed in a watertight door during the course/scope of her employment w/ defendant cruise line (Royal Caribbean Cruises) and she was taken to a hospital. Plaintiff contended that the defendant failed to provide a safe work environment and failed to provide her w/ adequate medical care after the accident. The defendant denied liability. Plaintiff was admitted to defendant's medical facility after undergoing a leg amputation procedure at a hospital. A few months later while he was a patient of the defendant, plaintiff began to develop problems w/ his L hand as a result of the stroke he suffered the previous year. He had began to contract, eventually resulting in partial paralysis of the land and plaintiff held his hand so that it jammed under his chin w/ his arm pulled tightly to his body. Plaintiff's treatment involved defendant providing foam balls to be placed in his hands and foam padding to be placed between his hands and chin to prevent sores. The negligence of the defendant in failing to properly examine and manage pressure sores on plaintiff's hands permitted them to deteriorate to the extent that they caused the need for surgery to amputate his L hand and wrist.
6 $ 1,700, Settlement Products Liability Garden Tool $ 750, Settlement Products Liability Ammunition Plaintiff suffered R hand amputation when his hand was caught in a wood chipper, manufactured by the defendant. Plaintiff claimed that the defendant negligently manufactured the chipper, that the product was not safe for its intended purpose and that the defendant failed to warn of a known dangerous condition. Plaintiff alleged The defendant that he suffered denied L liability. hand amputation and 2nd/3rd degree burns to L arm and face that resulting in permanent scarring after a grenade, designed and manufactured by the co-defendant and distributed by the defendant, unexpectedly exploded in his hand while he was training in the Army. Plaintiff contended that the defendants negligently designed, manufactured, and distributed the grenade, failed to ensure that their products were safe for their intended use and purpose,distributed the grenade in a defective and unreasonably dangerous condition, and failed to warn of the defective nature of the products. Defendants admitted liability. $ 3,592, Plaintiff Employer Negligence Construction Employee Plaintiff alleged that he suffered electrical shock injuries that necessitated the amputation of one of his hands and the use of a prosthesis when he and a nonparty worker held onto joists being moved w/ a crane, in the course/scope of his employment, as the crane came into contact w/ a live powerline. The plaintiff contended that the defendant failed to properly monitor and supervise the operation of the crane, that the nonparty crane operator failed to keep a proper lookout and negligently struck the live powerline, and that the defendant failed to provide a safe work environment. The defendant denied liability, contended that the plaintiff's claim should be resolved by workers' compensation.
7 $ - Defendant Products Liability Indemnification Claim Plaintiff was working for 3rd-party defendant near a Herr Voss Roll Leveler which is used to flatten metal sheets. The sheets were then placed in a hot oven and the plaintiff, using large tongs and wearing a large oven mitten, would pull the metal from the oven and transfer it to a roller table and then the roll leveler. While transferring a hot sheet of metal into the roll leveler, the plaintiff got his L hand stuck in the front pinch rollers. The plaintiff filed a negligence action against defendant, the seller of the roll leveler, claiming that the defendant knowingly sold the leveler w/o proper safety guards. Defendant filed cross-claim against the manufacturer for indemnification pursuant to the parties' sales contract. $ 6,300, Plaintiff Products Liability Pasta Machine $ 3,000, Plaintiff Products Liability Automobile No facts given $ 425, Settlement Products Liability Explosive No facts given $ 1,010, Plaintiff Employer Negligence Industrial Employee No facts given Plaintiff suffered R hand amputation (dominant) when a pastamaking machine turned on while the plaintiff's hand was in the machine. Plaintiff claimed that because of a defective safety switch the machine turned on by itself. The plaintiff accused defendants of negligence in selling the machine that they knew to be defective. Plaintiff could no longer cook and took a supervisory position instead. $ 2,250, CN: Plaintiff 35%; Defendant 65% Products Liability Small Kitchen Appliance Minor suffered R hand amputation when his hand became caught in a grinder-mixer manufactured by the defendant appliance company when the minor was able to switch on the machine by himself. The plaintiff contended that the defendant failed to design the grinder-mixer in compliance w/ sound engineering principles and that the defendant allowed dangerous and defective conditions to exist. The plaintiff also contended that the defendant was strictly liable for the incident because they failed to properly inspect and/or test the grinder-mixer to discover defects. The plaintiff further contended that the defendant failed to provide printed warnings or instructions, failed to provide adequate safety devices, and breached the appliances warranties.
8 $ 2,080,248.72
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Research Total $ Verdict Case Type Subcategory Facts
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Research Total Verdict Case Type Subcategory Facts 6,233.00 Plaintiff Premises Liability Restaurant Accident Plaintiff claimed bilateral carpal tunnel due to electric shock from
More informationUninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UM) Herniated Discs Total $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts
Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UM) Herniated Discs Total $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts $ - Defense MVA Rear-end $ 12,500.00 Plaintiff MVA Rear-end Plaintiff alleged that she suffered a herniated
More informationPaul v Samuels 2011 NY Slip Op 30513(U) February 23, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 26700/2008 Judge: Howard G.
Paul v Samuels 2011 NY Slip Op 30513(U) February 23, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 26700/2008 Judge: Howard G. Lane Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationBroken Toe Research Total Award $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts
Broken Toe Research Total Award $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts $ 265,000.00 CN: Plaintiff 90%; Defense 10% Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall The plaintiff claimed that she slipped and fell in accumulated
More informationEmployment Permit Application for 14 through 17 Year-Olds
Employment Permit Application for 14 through 17 Year-Olds Instructions: After completing the form and obtaining the required signatures as indicated, take this completed form to the Superintendent of Schools,
More informationCatastrophiC injury / Wrongful Death
CatastrophiC injury / Wrongful Death 360 www.mpplaw.com about our practice Morris polich & purdy llp has a team of seasoned trial attorneys dedicated to handling, in both state and federal court, high-exposure
More informationFILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 02/15/ :54 PM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2017
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NIAGARA MARTINE JURON vs. Plaintiff, GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS HOLDING CORPORATION, COMPLAINT GENERAL MOTORS LLC, SATURN OF CLARENCE, INC., now known
More information1999 Survey of Rhode Island Law: Cases: Products Liability
Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 25 Spring 2000 1999 Survey of Rhode Island Law: Cases: Products Liability Carly E. Beauvais Roger Williams University School of Law Follow
More informationJOANN E. LEWIS OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No November 1, 1996
Present: All the Justices JOANN E. LEWIS OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No. 960421 November 1, 1996 CARPENTER COMPANY FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND T. J. Markow, Judge
More informationAnswer A to Question 4
Question 4 A zoo maintenance employee threw a pile of used cleaning rags into a hot, enclosed room on the zoo s premises. The rags contained a flammable cleaning fluid that later spontaneously burst into
More informationPresent: Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Mims, JJ., and Russell and Lacy, S.JJ.
Present: Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Mims, JJ., and Russell and Lacy, S.JJ. CNH AMERICA LLC v. Record No. 091991 OPINION BY JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS January 13, 2011 FRED N. SMITH FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff, TIMOTHY YOUNG, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLEN
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Torts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Manufacturer designed and manufactured
More informationDefining the Retained Control Exception: An Update on 414
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 19, Number 3 (19.3.30) Feature Article By: Kingshuk K. Roy Purcell & Wardrope, Chtd.
More informationStrict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW
Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY The legal liability of manufacturers, sellers, and lessors of goods to consumers, users and bystanders for physical harm or injuries or property
More informationElectricity Act, 1998 Loi de 1998 sur l électricité
Electricity Act, 1998 Loi de 1998 sur l électricité ONTARIO REGULATION 22/04 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SAFETY Consolidation Period: From October 1, 2017 to the e-laws currency date. Last amendment: O. Reg.
More informationAnswer A to Question 10. To prevail under negligence, the plaintiff must show duty, breach, causation, and
Answer A to Question 10 3) ALICE V. WALTON NEGLIGENCE damage. To prevail under negligence, the plaintiff must show duty, breach, causation, and DUTY Under the majority Cardozo view, a duty is owed to all
More informationSafety & Risk Management
Safety & Risk Management (B) Construction Safety Law http://www.mom.gov.sg/legislation/ occupational-safetyhealth/pages/default.aspx ACTS Work Injury Compensation Act (WICA) Workplace Safety and Health
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION ROBERT FENSTERMACHER, : NO: CV-2016-5527 : Plaintiff, : v. : : SANDS BETHLEHEM RETAIL, LLC, : And SANDS BETHLEHEM GAMING,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LISA BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED July 22, 2003 V No. 235475 Oakland Circuit Court BARTON-MALOW CO. and BARTON-MALOW LC No. 00-020107-NO ENTERPRISES, INC.,
More informationEscalera v SNC-Lavalin, Inc NY Slip Op 30765(U) March 21, 2018 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Howard H.
Escalera v SNC-Lavalin, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 30765(U) March 21, 2018 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 301889/11 Judge: Howard H. Sherman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationTotal Knee Replacement Research Total $ Outcome Type Subcategory Facts
Total Knee Replacement Research Total Outcome Type Subcategory Facts 288,000.00 Plaintiff Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Plaintiff slipped and fell while on crutches in the defendant apartment complex's
More informationADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE TORT LIABILITY DUTIES TO OTHERS. Name: Period: Row:
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE TORT LIABILITY DUTIES TO OTHERS Name: Period: Row: I. WHAT IS A TORT? A. A tort is any unreasonable action that someone or does damage to a person's property. 1. An overtired
More informationThis application is made in accordance with the Amtrak Regulations Governing Exercise of First Amendment Rights, revised 3/8/2005.
APPLICATION TO EXERCISE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) AND/OR CHICAGO UNION STATION CO., AT CHICAGO, ILLINOIS This application is made
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND
Antrobus et al v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lynette Antrobus, Individually c/o John Mulvey, Esq. 2306 Park Ave., Suite 104
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION Andrew Cichon and Susan Cichon, Plaintiffs, v. Steele and Loeber Lumber Co., Metropolitan Lumber Co., Cook County Lumber Co.,
More informationGarcia v Pepsico, Inc NY Slip Op 30051(U) September 13, 2002 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Judge: Paula J. Omansky Republished
Garcia v Pepsico, Inc. 2002 NY Slip Op 30051(U) September 13, 2002 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Judge: Paula J. Omansky Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationHerniated Disc Case Analysis Total $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts $ 417, Plaintiff MVA-Bus Bus None
Herniated Disc Case Analysis Total Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts 417,549.00 Plaintiff MVA-Bus Bus None 4,710.56 Plaintiff MVA-Truck Rear-end This case involved minimal impact when the plaintiff's
More informationQuestion 1. Under what theory or theories might Paul recover, and what is his likelihood of success, against: a. Charlie? b. KiddieRides-R-Us?
Question 1 Twelve-year-old Charlie was riding on his small, motorized 3-wheeled all terrain vehicle ( ATV ) in his family s large front yard. Suddenly, finding the steering wheel stuck in place, Charlie
More informationThe Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development Department of Labor DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development Department of Labor DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY Employment Permit Application for 14 through 17 Year-Olds INSTRUCTIONS:
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (CHAPTER 354A) WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH (WORK AT HEIGHTS) REGULATIONS 2013
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (CHAPTER 354A) WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH (WORK AT HEIGHTS) REGULATIONS 2013 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 65 of the Workplace Safety and Health Act, Mr
More informationthe barn. Booking Information. Over 18 Yes No Telephone number Date of hire Time of hire From To Purpose of Hire
Booking Information Name Address Over 18 Yes No Telephone number Email Date of hire Time of hire From To Purpose of Hire Number of guests (40 max) Shared use of toilet* Yes No Alcohol Yes No Birthday candles**
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO. 107442/2010... NYSCEF DON 61712010 DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2010 -against- Plaintiff@), LIFE FTTNESS, A DIVISION OF BRUNSWICK CORPORATION and
More informationLAW REVIEW MARCH 2004 ENTRAPMENT DANGER IN PLAYGROUND REPORTED BUT NOT CORRECTED. James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C.
ENTRAPMENT DANGER IN PLAYGROUND REPORTED BUT NOT CORRECTED James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2004 James C. Kozlowski Unless expressly enacted into legislation through a local ordinance or state statute,
More informationExcuses. to avoid paying a fair & reasonable settlement. By Eddie & Chuck Farah, Attorneys At Law
Excuses used by insurance companies to avoid paying a fair & reasonable settlement. By Eddie & Chuck Farah, Attorneys At Law YOUR FUTURE IS WORTH FIGHTING FOR. When you've been injured in a car accident,
More informationNEW JERSEY LAW REVISION COMMISSION. Final Report Relating to. Equine Activities Liability Act. May 22, 2014
NEW JERSEY LAW REVISION COMMISSION Final Report Relating to Equine Activities Liability Act May 22, 2014 The work of the New Jersey Law Revision Commission is only a recommendation until enacted. Please
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F CURTIS W. WALLACE, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F009656 CURTIS W. WALLACE, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT UNITED HOIST & CRANE, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT ST. PAUL MERCURY INS. CO., CARRIER RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA WILLIAM RALPH MURPHY, * CODY MURPHY, and CORY JARVIS, * * Plaintiffs, * * CIVIL ACTION NO.: v. * * PROGRESSIVE HAWAII INSURANCE * CORP, GARY EMERY,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE JESSICA LOVEJOY. and
Court File No.: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: JESSICA LOVEJOY Plaintiff and HOMER SIMPSON, MARGE SIMPSON, OTTO MANN, SHELBYVILLE SHIPPING, THE TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, and DUFF GENERAL INSURANCE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STACEY HELFNER, Next Friend of AMBER SEILICKI, Minor, UNPUBLISHED June 20, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 265757 Macomb Circuit Court CENTER LINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS and LC
More informationDiener v Fernandez 2015 NY Slip Op 30109(U) January 5, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 6805/2014 Judge: Robert J.
Diener v Fernandez 2015 NY Slip Op 30109(U) January 5, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 6805/2014 Judge: Robert J. McDonald Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO TOBY ROSS 691 S. Elliston Trowbridge Rd Elmore, OH. 43416 and TAMRA ROSS 691 S. Elliston Trowbridge Rd Elmore, OH 43416 v. Plaintiffs, IBRAHIM BOATENG 324
More informationBerger, Nazarian, Leahy,
UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2067 September Term, 2014 UNIVERSITY SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, INC. v. STACEY RHEUBOTTOM Berger, Nazarian, Leahy, JJ. Opinion by Nazarian, J. Filed:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00272-HLM Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION BOBBY JORDAN and SHERRI BELL, INDIVIDUALLY and AS CO- ADMINISTRATORS
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Patrick Hardy, by and through his attorney, Joshua D.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED Pulaski County Circuit Court Larry Crane, Circuit/County Clerk 2017-Aug-29 12:58:17 60CV-17-4731 C06D02 : 15 Pages IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PATRICK
More informationLAW REVIEW SEPTEMBER 1992 PLAYGROUND LIABILITY FOR EXPOSED CONCRETE FOOTING UNDER MONKEY BARS IN STATE PARK
PLAYGROUND LIABILITY FOR EXPOSED CONCRETE FOOTING UNDER MONKEY BARS IN STATE PARK James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1992 James C. Kozlowski Documents like the Consumer Product Safety Commission's Handbook
More informationInaction in the Face of Serious Safety Risk Amounts to Criminal Negligence for Metron Supervisor
OHS & Workers Compensation Commentary for Management OCTOBER 13, 2015 Inaction in the Face of Serious Safety Risk Amounts to Criminal Negligence for Metron Supervisor Authors: Jeremy Warning and Cheryl
More informationLevy v Planet Fitness Inc NY Slip Op 33755(U) December 18, 2013 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 5250/11 Judge: Mary H.
Levy v Planet Fitness Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 33755(U) December 18, 2013 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 5250/11 Judge: Mary H. Smith Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationDISTRICT OF CHETWYND BYLAW NO. 874, A bylaw to regulate or prohibit the making or causing of noises or sound in the municipality
DISTRICT OF CHETWYND BYLAW NO. 874, 2008 A bylaw to regulate or prohibit the making or causing of noises or sound in the municipality WHEREAS pursuant to the Community Charter, Council may, by bylaw, regulate,
More informationSPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE IN OCEAN AND INLAND MARINE CLAIMS. Spoliation of evidence has been defined as the destruction or material
I. INTRODUCTION SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE IN OCEAN AND INLAND MARINE CLAIMS Spoliation of evidence has been defined as the destruction or material modification of evidence by an act or omission of a party.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS FLOYD R. JOLIFF and MELISSA JOLIFF, Plaintiffs-Appellees, UNPUBLISHED September 6, 2002 v No. 232530 Wayne Circuit Court DETROIT CITY DAIRY, INC., LC No. 99-932905-NP
More informationQuestion 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:
Question 1 A state statute requires motorcyclists to wear a safety helmet while riding, and is enforced by means of citations and fines. Having mislaid his helmet, Adam jumped on his motorcycle without
More informationResidence Hall Policies
Residence Hall Policies When you signed your Residential Housing Contract, you agreed to certain legal requirements, and specific guidelines in entering and terminating the agreement. One of the conditions
More informationVicarious Liability: imposed in certain relationships eg. Employee/ Employer
CONCURRENT LIABILITY: VICARIOUS LIABILITY AND INTRODUCTION TO!" NEGLIGENCE Vicarious Liability: imposed in certain relationships eg. Employee/ Employer Vicarious liability may exist if the wrongful act
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
More informationJUNE 2012 LAW REVIEW NO LIABILITY FOR OBVIOUS PLAYGROUND FALL DANGER
NO LIABILITY FOR OBVIOUS PLAYGROUND FALL DANGER James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2012 James C. Kozlowski As illustrated by the cases described herein, a review of reported court decisions involving landowner
More informationMotion for Summary Judgment (Judge Randy Hammock)
Motion for Summary Judgment (Judge Randy Hammock) Case Number: BC584668 Hearing Date: January 03, 2017 Dept: 93 BALBINA OLIVEROS ELIZONDO, Plaintiff, vs. ROADRUNNER AUTO SALES, Defendant. [TENTATIVE] ORDER
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GAILA MARIE MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION July 11, 2006 9:05 a.m. V No. 259228 Kent Circuit Court THE RAPID INTER-URBAN TRANSIT LC No. 03-001526-NO PARTNERSHIP
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ANNE F. DANAHER, th 811 W. 45 St. Kansas City, MO 64111 Plaintiff, v. Case No.: WILD OATS MARKETS, INC., Serve resident agent: The Corporation
More informationAn Unreasonable Example of Reasonable Alternative Design? - Osorio v. One
An Unreasonable Example of Reasonable Alternative Design? - Osorio v. One World Technologies, Inc. Is a manufacturer required to make the safest possible product, even at the expense of design and function?
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2011 CLAIM NO. 697 of 2008 GILBERT CADLE CLAIMANT AND BELIZE ELECTRICITY LIMITED DEFENDANT Hearings 2011 20 th May 27 th June 25 th July 15 th August 8 th November
More informationRANGE RULES BE SMART. SHOOT SAFE. HAVE FUN. INDOOR SHOOTING RANGE TRAINING SALES. Signature: Date:
BE SMART. SHOOT SAFE. HAVE FUN. RANGE RULES 1. All firearms brought onto premises must be either unloaded in a gun case or holder or, if loaded, in a holster. Rocky Mountain Gun Club, LLC reserves the
More informationBroken Femur Research Total Award $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts
Broken Femur Research Total Award Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts - Defense Negligence Trip and Fall 75,000.00 CN: Plaintiff 45%; Defendant 55% MVA Pedestrian 142,859.00 Plaintiff MVA Broadside Plaintiff
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Filed 10/26/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX AL KHOSH, v. Plaintiff and Appellant, 2d Civil No. B268937 (Super. Ct.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION
Case 5:12-cv-00173-CAR Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION TIMOTHY R. COURSON AND ) LINDA COURSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )
More informationANSWER A TO ESSAY QUESTION 5
ANSWER A TO ESSAY QUESTION 5 Sally will bring products liability actions against Mfr. based on strict liability, negligence, intentional torts and warranty theories. Strict Products Liability A strict
More informationFOURTH DISTRICT CERTIFIES CLAIMS BILL QUESTION AS ONE OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE.
Clark Fountain welcomes referrals of personal injury, products liability, medical malpractice and other cases that require extensive time and resources. We handle cases throughout the state and across
More informationNo Appeal. (PC )
Supreme Court No. 2003-68-Appeal. (PC 00-1179) Jose Cruz : v. : Town of North Providence. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are
More informationSTREET USE AND MAINTENANCE
CHAPTER 135 135.01 Removal of Warning Devices 135.07 Washing Vehicles 135.02 Obstructing or Defacing 135.08 Burning Prohibited 135.03 Placing Debris On 135.09 Excavations 135.04 Playing In 135.10 Maintenance
More informationBYLAW #797A OF THE TOWN OF KILLAM IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA
BYLAW #797A OF THE TOWN OF KILLAM IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BEING A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF KILLAM IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, TO PROVIDE FOR THE PREVENTION, REGULATION AND CONTROL OF THE LIGHTING OF FIRES
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JAMES BAZINET. Argued: October 19, 2017 Opinion Issued: April 10, 2018
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed November 1, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00719-CV JOSE HERNANDEZ, Appellant V. SUN CRANE AND HOIST, INC.: JLB PARTNERS, L.P.; JLB
More informationDC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
4-CIT/CERT MAIL CAUSE NO. DC-17-02842 FILED DALLAS COUNTY 3/8/2017 4:47:47 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK Jesse Reyes Dee Voigt, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Peggy Hoffman, Deceased,
More information. A. report to the security guard B. inform the foreman C. drink more water D. apply for a Permit-to-work.
01 In a shipyard, before you are allowed to carry out any hot work, you must. A. report to the security guard B. inform the foreman C. drink more water D. apply for a Permit-to-work. 02 Which is a good
More informationThe section Causation: Actual Cause and Proximate Cause from Business Law and the Legal Environment was adapted by The Saylor Foundation under a
The section Causation: Actual Cause and Proximate Cause from Business Law and the Legal Environment was adapted by The Saylor Foundation under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0
More informationSTRICT LIABILITY. (1) involves serious potential harm to persons or property,
STRICT LIABILITY Strict Liability: Liability regardless of fault. Among others, defendants whose activities are abnormally dangerous or involve dangerous animals are strictly liable for any harm caused.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS NANCY WIETEK, an individual, and her husband, DANIEL WIETEK, an individual, Case Number: Plaintiffs, Judge: vs Magistrate Judge: KERZNER INTERNATIONAL
More informationDEFENDANT S CASE EVALUATION SUMMARY INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff, *** fell in the entryway of the *** on ***, allegedly injuring her shoulder and
DEFENDANT S CASE EVALUATION SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, *** fell in the entryway of the *** on ***, allegedly injuring her shoulder and knee. Plaintiff believes that she lost consciousness and cannot
More informationPage 1 of 10 N.C.P.I. MOTOR VEHICLE TABLE OF CONTENTS MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION
Page 1 of 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION GUIDE TO THE USE OF THIS BOOK SIGNIFICANT NEW DEVELOPMENTS NORTH CAROLINA PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CASES: *Dates the instructions
More informationChapter 2 NOISE CONTROL
5-2-1: SHORT TITLE: 5-2-2: DECLARATION OF POLICY: 5-2-3: DEFINITIONS: 5-2-4: GENERAL PROHIBITIONS: 5-2-5: SOUND LEVEL STANDARDS: 5-2-6: AMPLIFIED SOUND: 5-2-7: VIOLATION, PENALTY: 5-2-1: SHORT TITLE: Chapter
More information2010 PA Super 179. : : : : No EDA 2009
2010 PA Super 179 STERLING LEWIS, Appellant v. CRC INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 2358 EDA 2009 Appeal from the Judgment entered June 19, 2009 In the Court of Common
More informationHOT TOPIC ISSUE: SPOILATION. General Liability Track, Session 3 Fifth Annual General Liability & Workers Compensation Seminar
HOT TOPIC ISSUE: SPOILATION General Liability Track, Session 3 Fifth Annual General Liability & Workers Compensation Seminar Carlock, Copeland & Stair Speaker: Scott Huray, Partner WHAT IS IT? Spoliation
More informationPlaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. This matter is before the court on motions for summary judgment by both
STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, ss. WILLIAM HOOPS, v. Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PR RESTAURANTS LLC, d/b/a PANERA BREAD, and CORNERBRooK LLC, Defendants. I. BEFORE THE COURT
More informationEngineering Law. Professor Barich Class 8
Engineering Law Professor Barich Class 8 Review Quiz 2 Announcements Verify Grades on Compass Reminder - Exam #2 March 29 th Joe Barich, 2018. 2 Summary - 1 Statute of Frauds - If a contact is a big deal
More informationGENE ROBERT HERR, II OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. September 15, 2006 FRANCES STUART WHEELER
Present: All the Justices GENE ROBERT HERR, II OPINION BY v. Record No. 051825 JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. September 15, 2006 FRANCES STUART WHEELER FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY Paul
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Torts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Autos, Inc. manufactures a two-seater
More informationKaplan v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J NY Slip Op 31366(U) May 28, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2007 Judge: Jane S.
Kaplan v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. 2010 NY Slip Op 31366(U) May 28, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 107771/2007 Judge: Jane S. Solomon Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationClarification Questions and Answers
Clarification Questions and Answers For purposes of this competition, the answer to any clarification question shall be treated as a stipulation during the trial. The competitors are bound by the answers
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Bulduk v. Walgreen Co., 2015 IL App (1st) 150166 Appellate Court Caption SAIME SEBNEM BULDUK and ABDULLAH BULDUK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WALGREEN COMPANY, an
More information2017 IL App (1st)
2017 IL App (1st) 152397 SIXTH DIVISION FEBRUARY 17, 2017 No. 1-15-2397 MIRKO KRIVOKUCA, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Cook County. ) v. ) No. 13 L 7598 ) THE CITY OF CHICAGO,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOSEPH KOSMALSKI and KATHY KOSMALSKI, on behalf of MARILYN KOSMALSKI, a Minor, FOR PUBLICATION March 4, 2004 9:05 a.m. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 240663 Ogemaw Circuit
More information1/9/2019 1:52 PM 19CV01569 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.
// 1: PM CV0 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH Becki Marchinek, Case No. v. Plaintiff, MCDONALD S CORPORATION, MCDONALD S USA, LLC, MCDONALD S RESTAURANTS OF OREGON,
More informationCase 1:08-cv NGG-RML Document 12 Filed 12/09/08 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:08-cv-02965-NGG-RML Document 12 Filed 12/09/08 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIAN HOPKINS, LIANA HOPKINS and SEAN HOPKINS, v. Plaintiffs NATIONAL RAILROAD
More informationForssell v Lerner 2011 NY Slip Op 30461(U) February 16, 2011 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 37077/2009 Judge: William B.
Forssell v Lerner 2011 NY Slip Op 30461(U) February 16, 2011 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 37077/2009 Judge: William B. Rebolini Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 97-CV Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationCOMANCHE NATION TRIBAL COURT DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL PLEADINGS PACKET COMANCHE NATION TRIBAL COURT DISTRICT COURT The forms in this packet are to be used as a template, please re-type the forms and do not fill in the blanks. Please read the instructions
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS EUGENE ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED February 19, 2013 v No. 308332 Oakland Circuit Court PONTIAC ULTIMATE AUTO WASH, L.L.C., LC No. 2011-117031-NO Defendant-Appellee.
More informationCase 1:14-cv Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:14-cv-00133 Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION DIGNA O. QUEZADA CUEVAS, Plaintiff, v.
More informationHarris v Metro North Commuter R.R NY Slip Op 31211(U) May 29, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Eileen A.
Harris v Metro North Commuter R.R. 2013 NY Slip Op 31211(U) May 29, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 115890/2009 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F KATHY CHRISTIAN, EMPLOYEE GUNTER S FAMILY RESTAURANT, EMPLOYER UNINSURED
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F300150 KATHY CHRISTIAN, EMPLOYEE GUNTER S FAMILY RESTAURANT, EMPLOYER UNINSURED CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED OCTOBER 1, 2003 Hearing
More information