LAW015C (4 cr.) Torts Fenton Room F109
|
|
|
- Gary Fleming
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LAW015C (4 cr.) Torts Fenton Room F109 Syllabus, Fall :20 M, W, TH INTENTIONAL TORTS Mon., Aug. 13 BATTERY cb. * 3-12; (including note) [Vosburg v. Putney; Dougherty v. Stepp; McGuire v. Almy] Hypothetical #1 Wed., Aug. 15 ASSAULT cb [I. de S. and Wife v. W. de S., Tuberville v. Savage; W. Blackstone, Commentaries]. Hypothetical #2 Handouts, pp. 1-7 [Zaslow v. Kroenert; Russel-Vaughn Ford, Inc. v. Rouse; Restatement (2d) Torts 222A; Southern Counties v. RKO]. Hypothetical #3 Thr., Aug. 16 FALSE IMPR cb (thru note 1) [Bird v. Jones; Coblyn v. Kennedy s Inc.] Mon., Aug. 20 IIED cb (thru note note 1) [Wilkinson v. Downton] Handout, pp [Wallace v. Shoreham Hotel Corp.] Hypothetical #4 DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS Wed., Aug 22 CONSENT cb [Mohr v. Williams; Hudson v. Craft]. Hypothetical #5 Thr., Aug. 23 SELF DFNS cb (skip note 3) [Courvoisier v. Raymond] DFNS/PRPT cb [Bird v. Holbrook] Hypothetical #6 Mon., Aug. 27 Wed., Aug. 29 NECESSITY cb [Ploof v. Putnam; Vincent v. Lake Erie Transportation Co.; Judith Jarvis Thompson, The Trolley Problem] Hypothetical #7 NEGLIGENCE RSBL PRSN cb (thru note2); [Vaughan v. Menlove; Holmes, The Common Law; Roberts v. Ring; Daniels v. Evans]. Hypothetical #8 * cb. refers to Cases and Materials on Torts (10th ed.) by Richard A. Epstein and Catherine M. Sharkey. 1
2 Thr., Aug. 30 Mon., Sept. 3 cb [Breunig v. American Family Insurance Co.; Fletcher v. City of Aberdeen; Denver & Rio Grande R.R. v. Peterson] LABOR DAY Wed., Sept. 5 CALC. RISK cb [Blyth v. Birmingham Water Works; Eckert v. Long Island R.R.; Terry, Negligence; Seavey, Negligence - -Subjective or Objective?; Osborne v. Montgomery; Cooley v Public Service Co.; Thr., Sept. 6 cb [United States v. Carroll Towing Co.; Andrews v United Airlines] Hypothetical #9 Mon., Sept. 10 CUSTOM cb (thru note 6); (thru note 2) [Titus v. Bradford; Mayhew v. Sullivan Mining Co.; The T.J. Hooper; Lama v. Borras; Cantebury v Spence]. Hypotheticals #10, 11 Wed., Sept. 12 STATUTES cb (thru note 3) [Anon; Thayer, Public Wrong and Private Action; Osborne v McMasters] cb [Martin v. Herzog; Uhr v. East Greenbush Central] Hypothetical #12 Thr., Sept. 13 cb RES IPSA cb (skip note 2) [Byrne v. Boadle; Colmenares Vivas v. Sun Alliance Insurance Co.] Mon., Sept. 17 Wed., Sept. 19 Thr., Sept. 20 Handout, pp [Benedict v. Eppley Hotel Co.] cb (thru note 2) [Ybarra v. Spangard] Hypothetical #13 CAUSATION CS IN FACT cb [New York Central R.R. v. Grimstad; Zuchowicz v. United States]; cb [Herskovitz]; cb (thru note 2) [Kingston v. Chicago & N.W. Ry] cb [Summers v. Tice; Sindell v Abbott Labs] [September 24-26: Practice Mid-term Examination] 2
3 Mon., Sept. 24 Wed., Sept. 26 Thr., Sept. 27 October 1-5 PRX CAUSE cb [Bacon, The Elements of the Common Lawes of England; Street, Foundations of Legal Liability; Ryan v. New York Central R. Co.; Berry v. The Borough of Sugar Notch] cb [Brower v. New York Central & H.R.R.; Wagner v. International Ry.]; cb , note 2 [Gorris v. Scott] cb [In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co.; Wagon Mound (No. 1)] FALL BREAK Mon., Oct. 8 cb [Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R.; Marshall v. Nugent] Wed., Oct. 10 NIED cb [Mitchell v. Rochester Railway; Dillon v. Legg] Hypothetical #14 Thr., Oct. 11 TBA Mon., Oct. 15 VIC. LIAB. cb [Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. United States; Petrovich v. Share Health] Wed., Oct. 17 Thr., Oct. 18 CNTR NEGL cb [Butterfield v. Forrester; Beems v Chicago; Schwartz, Tort Law and The Economy]; cb [Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.] cb [Leroy Fibre Co.; Derheim v. Fiorito Co.] cb [Lamson v. American Axe & Tool Co.; Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.] Mon., Oct. 22 Wed., Oct. 24 COMP NEGL cb [Lombard Laws; Beach, Contributory Negligence; Prosser, Comparative Negligence; Li v. Yellow Cab Co. of California] AFFIRMATIVE DUTIES DUTY/RESC cb [Luke 10:30-37; Buch v. Amory Mfct. Co.; Hurley v. Eddingfield; Bohlen; Ames; Epstein; Posner; Bender] 3
4 cb [Montgomery v. National Convoy & Trucking Co.] Thr., Oct. 25 GRT UNDTK cb [Coggs v. Bernard; Erie R.R. v. Stewart; Marsalis v. Lasalle; Moch v Rensselaer] Mon., Oct. 29 OWN/OCC. cb [Robert Addie & Sons v. Dumbreck; Rowland v. Christian]; Handout chart cb [Kline v 1500 Mass Ave.] Wed., Oct. 31 SPEC. REL. cb [Restatement (2d) Torts 315]; cb [Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California] STRICT LIABILITY Thr., Nov. 1 A CHOICE cb [Fletcher v. Rylands (1865); Fletcher v. Rylands (1866); Rylands v. Fletcher (1868)] Handout, pp [Prosser and Keeton on Torts] ANIMALS cb [Gehrts. v. Batteen] ULTR-HZRD cb [Spano v. Perrini Corp; Restatement (3d) Torts 20] Mon., Nov. 5 Wed., Nov. 7 Handout, pp [Siegler v. Kuhlman] cb [Indiana Harbor Belt R.R v. American Cyanamid Co.] Hypothetical #15 PRODUCTS LIABILITY cb [Restatement (2d) Torts 402A] cb [Restatement (3d) Products Liability, 1]. MFCT DFCT cb [Restatement(3d) Products Liability, 3; Speller v. Sears] Thr., Nov. 8 Mon., Nov. 12 Wed., Nov. 14 DSGN DFCT cb [Campo v Scofield; Harper and James; Wade; Volkswagen v. Young; Barker v. Lull Engineering] Hypothetical #16 WRN DFCT cb [MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.; Vassallo v. Baxter Healthcare; Hood v. Ryobi] PROPER C/A cb [Casa Clara] 4
5 Thr., Nov. 15 Mon., Nov. 19 PLTF CNDCT cb [Daly v. General Motors Corp.] Hypothetical #17 Review (last day of class) Nov Thanksgiving Break 5
LAW015C (4 cr.) Torts Fenton Room F108
LAW015C (4 cr.) Torts Fenton Room F108 Syllabus, Fall 2017 2-3:20 M, T, TH INTENTIONAL TORTS Mon., Aug. 14 BATTERY cb. * 3-12; 28-32 (including note) [Vosburg v. Putney; Dougherty v. Stepp; McGuire v.
Torts. CURRENT AS OF September 29, Meeting Times: Tuesdays, Thursdays, 10 a.m. 11:50 a.m. Exam: Monday, December 11, noon 3 p.m.
Torts CURRENT AS OF September 29, 2017 Meeting Times: Tuesdays, Thursdays, 10 a.m. 11:50 a.m. Exam: Monday, December 11, noon 3 p.m. Office hours and whereabouts My phone number is (703) 993-8247. My email
How to attack problems
How to attack problems 1. first, do preemption 2. second, determine intentional or negligence 1. Intentional Analysis 1. Restatement 1. intends consequence 2. knows it will occur 2. Epstein 1. did x act?
Reading Assignments. On the following two pages, you will find the reading assignments for the Fall Semester.
Torts I 131C Fall 2010 Susan Keller Reading Assignments On the following two pages, you will find the reading assignments for the Fall Semester. The required text for the course is Henderson, Pearson and
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR TORTS STUDENTS
TORTS I Spring 2012 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR TORTS STUDENTS Welcome to Torts I. You should consider these instructions to be the rules of the road for the course. Please follow them closely. Read each
Torts Fall 2015 Professor Ray
TEXT: Torts, Cases and Materials, Prosser, Wade and Schwartz, 13 th Edition, 2015, Foundation Press Torts Fall 2015 Professor Ray READING ASSIGNMENTS (Assignments include notes following cases) INTENTIONAL
BACKGROUND I. Elements of a tort II. Tort Causes of Action INTENTIONAL TORTS I. Requirements to commit a battery d. Is their consent?
BACKGROUND I. Elements of a tort a. Duty does the def owe the pltf a duty to conform his conduct to a standard necessary to avoid an unreasonable risk? b. Breach did the def s conduct fall below the applicable
N AT I V E A M E R I C A N U N I V E R S I T Y
N AT I V E A M E R I C A N U N I V E R S I T Y To r t s www.native-american-edu.org 1 TORTS TORTS 101 & 102 Course Schedule Week #1 2 Text Chapter 1, Introduction to Intentional Torts, Pages 3-84 Roadmap
TORTS ( ) SECTION A COURSE OUTLINE AND SYLLABUS FALL 2015 UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER. Class Meeting Times: M, W, Th 2:30 4:00 pm
TORTS (12178-5418) SECTION A COURSE OUTLINE AND SYLLABUS FALL 2015 UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER Class Meeting Times: M, W, Th 2:30 4:00 pm Professor Barbara J. Evans Office Location: BLB-214 Phone:
Syllabus for Torts. Fall 2017 Office: Credits Office Phone: (703)
Syllabus for Torts Law 110-004 Professor: T.J. Chiang Fall 2017 Office: 325 4 Credits Office Phone: (703) 993-9868 E-mail: tchiang2@gmu.edu I. COURSE MATERIALS Frank J. Vandall, Ellen Wertheimer, and Mark
Joe can likely bring a claim against Acme World Film Studio for negligent operation of their ride Brad
Question 1 (part 1) Joe s Claims Joe v. Acme World Film Studio Negligence Joe can likely bring a claim against Acme World Film Studio for negligent operation of their ride Brad Bull. To make prevail on
University of Washington, School of Law. Law A 504A: Torts. Fall Quarter, COURSE DESCRIPTION
University of Washington, School of Law Law A 504A: Torts Fall Quarter, 2010-2011 Dongsheng Zang Assistant Professor of Law William H. Gates Hall #427 Updated: 2010-12-07 Tel: (206) 543-0830 Email: zangd@uw.edu
INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT:
INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT: Prima Facie case: Torts to (person/property) in which: - D s act with intent (desire or purpose to cause/knowledge of substantial certainty that results will occur) garratt v. dailey
University of Washington, School of Law. Law A 504A: Torts. Fall Quarter, COURSE DESCRIPTION
University of Washington, School of Law Law A 504A: Torts Fall Quarter, 2009-10 Dongsheng Zang Assistant Professor of Law William H. Gates Hall #427 Updated: October 26, 2009 Tel: (206) 543-0830 Email:
Emotional & dignitary harms = Assault, Offensive Battery, False Imprisonment
p. 1, Torts Outline, Larry Lee INTENTIONAL TORTS Generally 1. Act (voluntary) 2. Intent a. Subjective Intent to do unpermitted act (not intent to do all harm) i. Exception to subjective intent: IEDD (reckless/wanton)
TORTIOUSLY, 1249 i. Acts with purpose of producing consequence / acts knowing consequence is substantially certain to result
I. INTENTIONAL TORTS a. Intent (RTT 1) i. Acts with purpose of producing consequence / acts knowing consequence is substantially certain to result ii. Transferred intent (Talmage stick thrown hitting the
Chapter I. Trial Court Procedure in Torts Cases... 1
PREFACE... III TABLE OF CASES... XVII Chapter I. Trial Court Procedure in Torts Cases... 1 Chapter II. Intentional Harms to Persons and Property... 9 A. Introduction... 9 B. Battery... 10 Ghassemieh v.
Basic Information on Professor Eaton s Torts Class (Section Y) Fall 2017
Basic Information on Professor Eaton s Torts Class (Section Y) Fall 2017 1 Required Text: Prosser, Wade and Schwartz s Torts Cases and Materials (13 th edition 2015) (PWS); Required Text: The American
EXAMPLES AND EXPLANATIONS: THE LAW OF TORTS,
SYLLABUS TORTS Fall 2018 Professor Tamayo ytamayo@willamette.edu Office #447 Required Course Materials: The required course texts are: Dobbs, Hayden and Bublick, TORTS AND COMPENSATION, 8 th ed., (West
Lahore University of Management Sciences. Law 222 Torts
Law 222 Torts Fall 2017 Instructor Uzair Kayani Room No. 1-11 Office Hours By appointment Email uzair.kayani@lums.edu.pk Telephone X 5604 Secretary/TA TBD TA Office Hours TBD Course URL (if any) Course
Contents. I. Negligence: A Brief Overview 47 A. Elements of the Prima Facie Case 47 B. The Injury Element 48 C. Focusing on Physical Harms 50
Preface to the Fourth Edition Preface to the Third Edition Preface to the Second Edition Preface to the First Edition Acknowledgments Notes on the Text xxi xxiii xxv xxvii xxix xxxiii PART I: OVERVIEW
The Law of Torts. David K. DeWolf Professor Gonzaga University School of Law
The Law of Torts David K. DeWolf Professor Gonzaga University School of Law 2007-08 Classr oom edition (Originally published by Lupus Publications, Ltd., Lansing, Michigan; copyright transferred to David
Introduction to Anglo-American Law and Language
Introduction to Anglo-American Law and Language Vol. II Contract and Tort Law B. Sharon Byrd 2 nd edition Verlag C.H. Beck ohg, Miinchen Verlag Stampfli AG, Bern 2010 Table of Contents Preface Introduction
Casebook pages Chapter 9: Battery, Assault & False Imprisonment. Battery
Law 580: Torts Section 1 October 22, 2015 Casebook pages 587-618 Chapter 9: Battery, Assault & False Imprisonment Battery 1. Negligence Walter v. WalMart Stores (p. 5) 2. Strict Liability Pingaro v. Rossi
Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. General Principles of Liability
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases Chapter 1: General Principles of Liability 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Interests protected 1.3 The mental element in tort 1.3.1 Malice
PHILOSOPHY OF LAW PHILOSOPHY 6000 FALL 2013
PHILOSOPHY OF LAW PHILOSOPHY 6000 FALL 2013 Course Description: This course will provide an introduction to the philosophy of law. Rather than comprehensively explore some particular set of questions,
SYLLABUS. TORTS Fall 2016 Professor Tamayo Office #447. Required Course Materials: The required course texts are:
SYLLABUS TORTS Fall 2016 Professor Tamayo ytamayo@willamette.edu Office #447 Required Course Materials: The required course texts are: Dobbs, Hayden and Bublick, TORTS AND COMPENSATION, 7 th ed., (West
Anglo-American Contract and Torts. Prof. Mark P. Gergen. 11. Scope of Liability (Proximate Cause)
Anglo-American Contract and Torts Prof. Mark P. Gergen 11. Scope of Liability (Proximate Cause) 1) Duty/Injury 2) Breach 3) Factual cause 4) Legal cause/scope of liability 5) Damages Proximate cause Duty
Torts Syllabus Summer AJD Class. Course text: Dominick Vetri, Lawrence Levine, Joan Vogel & Ibrahim Gassama, Tort Law and Practice, 5th ed.
Torts Syllabus Summer AJD Class Summer, 2018 Professor Vogel Course text: Dominick Vetri, Lawrence Levine, Joan Vogel & Ibrahim Gassama, Tort Law and Practice, 5th ed. (2016) Course Requirements: Class
INTENTIONAL TORTS. Intent act intending to produce the harm OR know that harm is substantially certain to result
Torts INTENTIONAL TORTS Intent act intending to produce the harm OR know that harm is substantially certain to result Battery requires dual intent: 1) Act intending to cause harm or offensive contact with
American Politics Political Science 101 (Fall 2009) (Course # 35366) Class Meeting: MWF 2:30PM - 3:20PM Mahar, Room 108
American Politics Political Science 101 (Fall 2009) (Course # 35366) Class Meeting: MWF 2:30PM - 3:20PM Mahar, Room 108 Professor Ray La Raja Office: 330 Thompson Hall Tel: 545-6182 Email: laraja@polsci.umass.edu
Torts Office: Hazel Hall 307 Office Hours: Tuesday, 8:00 PM to. August 20 through November 27 Exam: Monday, Dec. 10 at 6:00 PM
Law 110, Section 004 Robert Leider Torts Office: Hazel Hall 307 Hazel Hall Office Hours: Tuesday, 8:00 PM to TR: 6:00-7:50 PM 9:00 PM, and by appointment Fall Semester: E-mail: rleider@gmu.edu August 20
Law of Tort (Paper 22, Unit 22) Syllabus - for the June and October 2009 Examinations
Outline of assessment Law of Tort (Paper 22, Unit 22) Syllabus - for the June and October 2009 Examinations Time allowed: 3 hours. Each question carries a total of 25 marks. The examination paper is divided
TORTS Course: LAW 508 Fall Semester 2017
TORTS Course: LAW 508 Fall Semester 2017 Professor Deana Pollard Sacks Texas Southern University Thurgood Marshall School of Law Class Location and Time: Section 2: M, W, F - 1-1:50 PM Room 106 Section
"Design Defect" in Products Liability: Rethinking Negligence and Strict Liability
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 43, Issue 1 (1982) 1982 "Design Defect" in Products Liability: Rethinking
Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published
Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level LAW 9084/43 Paper 4 October/November 2016 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 75 Published This mark scheme is
Indiana. 1Law journal Vol. 60,No. 8. Comparing Fault. No.
Indiana 1Law journal Vol. 60,No. 8 oocccccc1985 No. Comparing Fault DAVID C. SOBELSOHN* INTRODUCTION The rule that contributory negligence completely bars a plaintiff's recovery for negligence arose in
A. COURSE DESCRIPTION
SCHOOL OF LAW Year 2013/14 Term 1 LAW 105: TORT LAW J.D. STUDENTS SECTION INSTRUCTOR: DAVID N. SMITH PRACTICE PROFESSOR OF LAW Tel: 6828 0788 Email: davidsmith@smu.edu.sg Office: School of Law: level 4,
TORT LAW. Third Edition. Lewis N. Klar, Q.C. B.A., B.C.L., LL.M. Professor of Law University of Alberta THOMSON - ^ CARSWELL
TORT LAW Third Edition Lewis N. Klar, Q.C. B.A., B.C.L., LL.M. Professor of Law University of Alberta THOMSON - ^ CARSWELL TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Table ofcases v xix Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO TORT LÄW
SUMMER 2003 July 15, 2003 MIDTERM EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER
TORTS I PROFESSOR DEWOLF SUMMER 2003 July 15, 2003 MIDTERM EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER The facts for this question were based upon Comet Delta, Inc. v. Pate Stevedore Co. of Pascagoula, Inc., 521 So.2d 857, (Miss.
Copyright 2012 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. THE COMMON LAW PROCESS OF TORTS
THE COMMON LAW PROCESS OF TORTS LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board William Araiza Professor of Law Brooklyn Law School Ruth Colker Distinguished University Professor & Heck-Faust Memorial
CHAPTER 20 ASSAULT AND BATTERY
CHAPTER 20 ASSAULT AND BATTERY A. ASSAULT 20:1 Elements of Liability 20:2 Apprehension Defined 20:3 Intent to Place Another in Apprehension Defined 20:4 Actual or Nominal Damages B. BATTERY 20:5 Elements
NEGLIGENCE PER SE AND RES IPSA LOQUITUR: KISSING COUSINS
NEGLIGENCE PER SE AND RES IPSA LOQUITUR: KISSING COUSINS Aaron D. Twerski* At first glance, negligence per se and res ipsa loquitur appear to have little in common, except that they are found adjacent
University of Southern California Law School
University of Southern California Law School Legal Studies Working Paper Series Year 2016 Paper 232 Liability Without Regard to Fault: A Comment on Goldberg & Zipursky Gregory C. Keating University of
Section 3: The Law of Torts. Nature of Tort
P05 Insurance Law Section 3: The Law of Torts Nature of Tort Question 1: What is a tort? Question 2: Note at least 3 examples of torts. Torts and Crimes The same behaviour may result in a crime and a tort.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PATRICIA HAYES VINCENT, as mother and legal guardian of JAMES
PLS 492 Congress and the Presidency Fall 2009
PLS 492 Congress and the Presidency Fall 2009 Dr. Jungkun Seo Office: Leutze Hall 272 Department of Public and International Affairs Office Phone: (910) 962-2287 University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Negligence: Elements
Negligence: Elements 1) Duty: The defendant must owe a duty to the plaintiff to avoid causing the harm that was eventually caused. 2) Breach: The defendant must have breached this duty by acting unreasonably
call-in shows, 922 consent, See also voluntary assumption of risk careless performance of contract, 315 cattle trespass, 773 causation
Index absolute privilege, 926-932 abuse of process, 87-90, 477-478 abuse of public office, 383-391 accidental conduct, 36-39 accidents, successive, 560-564 accountants/auditors, negligence of, 515 act
Assessment criteria. The learner can: 1.1 Define tort. 1.2 Explain the characteristics of tort. 2.1 Explain the objectives of the law of tort
Unit 13 Title: Law of Tort Level: 6 Credit Value: 15 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the general principles of tortious liability 2 Understand the objectives of the law of tort Assessment
Comparative Fault and Strict Products Liability: Are They Compatible?
Pepperdine Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 8 1-15-1978 Comparative Fault and Strict Products Liability: Are They Compatible? C. R. Hickey Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr
This specification is for 2013 examinations
Unit 13 Title: Law of Tort Level: 6 Credit Value: 15 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the general principles of tortious liability 2 Understand the objectives of the law of tort Assessment
Brown v. Abbott Laboratories and Strict Products Liability
University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 1988 Brown v. Abbott Laboratories and Strict Products Liability J. Clark
Torts - Duty of a Commom Carrier to Passenger with Infirmity
Louisiana Law Review Volume 20 Number 4 June 1960 Torts - Duty of a Commom Carrier to Passenger with Infirmity Martin Smith Jr. Repository Citation Martin Smith Jr., Torts - Duty of a Commom Carrier to
UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW FALL 2015 SYLLABUS July 31, Course Instructors:
UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW FALL 2015 SYLLABUS July 31, 2015 Course: Course Name Legislation LAW Code 748 Section Number 512 Course Instructors: Bruce P. Martin, Esq. Executive Director Montgomery
WINFIELD TORT EIGHTH EDITION J. A. JOLOWICZ, M.A.
WINFIELD ON TORT EIGHTH EDITION BY J. A. JOLOWICZ, M.A. Of the Inner Temple and Gray's Inn, Barrister-at-Law; Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge; Lecturer in Law of the University of Cambridge AND T.
UNDERSTANDING TORTS FIFTH EDITION
UNDERSTANDING TORTS FIFTH EDITION LEXISNEXIS LAW SCHOOL PUBLISHING ADVISORY BOARD Paul Caron Professor of Law Pepperdine University School of Law Herzog Summer Visiting Professor in Taxation University
IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE. Plaintiff v. Defendant TRIAL BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF
1 1 1 CASE NO. ========================================================== IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE ==========================================================
Judicial Precedent Revision
Judicial Precedent Revision Stare Decisis Stare decisis means: stand by what has been decided. Points of law that have been decided in previous similar cases must be followed. This makes the system CONSISTENT,
Legislation & Regulation (Section 2) Fall 2012 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, WCC 1010 SYLLABUS
Legislation & Regulation (Section 2) Fall 2012 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, WCC 1010 Course Description: This course is an introduction to lawmaking in the modern administrative state. It will
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 549 U. S. (2007) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 05 746 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PETI- TIONER v. TIMOTHY SORRELL ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN
LexisNexis Capsule Summary Torts
[Note: Numbers in brackets refer to the printed pages of Understanding Torts by John L. Diamond, Lawrence Levine, and M. Stuart Madden where the topic is discussed.] LexisNexis Capsule Summary Torts Authors'
The attachment below is from "Corporate Watch", thought you all might find it useful for future researchldialogue.
Bra From: Sent: To: Subject: acgillis Christopher Ball [cball@ozone.org] Tuesday, September 07, 1999 11.39 AM brandon, tricrt@mailhostz.planet.net Corporate Crooks The attachment below is from "Corporate
IS THERE REALLY NO LIABILITY WITHOUT FAULT?: A CRITIQUE OF GOLDBERG & ZIPURSKY
IS THERE REALLY NO LIABILITY WITHOUT FAULT?: A CRITIQUE OF GOLDBERG & ZIPURSKY Gregory C. Keating* INTRODUCTION In their influential writings over the past twenty years and most recently in their article
IN THE FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT COLUMBUS, OHIO
[Cite as Columbus v. Nolan, 150 Ohio Misc.2d 44, 2009-Ohio-1083.] IN THE FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT COLUMBUS, OHIO City of Columbus, v. Case No. 2008 TRD 172209 February 26, 2009 Nolan. Danielle Thornsberry,
Case 1:11-cv RGS Document 200 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
Case 1:11-cv-10466-RGS Document 200 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE: Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) MDL 1203 MICHAEL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION ALERT
A. PARTIES FILE RESPONSES TO AMICI BRIEFS IN CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT COMPONENT PARTS DISPUTE O Neil, et al., v. Crane Co., et al.,, No. S177401, petition filed (Calif. Sup. Ct. Sept. 18, 2009) In a dispute
Environmental Causes of Action
Environmental Causes of Action NEERLS / SEER April 2012, Vancouver, PhD Law 1 Overview n Negligence: Berendsen n Nuisance n Carrier n Smith v. Inco; MacQueen n Heyes n Rylands / Trespass: Inco 2 Berendsen
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY PARALEGAL PROGRAM SYLLABUS. CEPL Substantive Law: TORTS
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY PARALEGAL PROGRAM SYLLABUS CEPL 25070 Substantive Law: TORTS Text: Emily Lynch Morissette, Personal Injury and the Law of Torts for Paralegals, Fourth Edition, Wolters Kluwer. Faculty:
Torts - Causation - Attempted Suicide - Mental Instability: Result of Injury or Independent Act?
DePaul Law Review Volume 15 Issue 1 Fall-Winter 1965 Article 19 Torts - Causation - Attempted Suicide - Mental Instability: Result of Injury or Independent Act? Eric Cahan Follow this and additional works
TORTS: THEORY AND PRACTICE FOURTH EDITION
TORTS: THEORY AND PRACTICE FOURTH EDITION LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Professor of Law Pepperdine University School of Law Herzog Summer Visiting Professor in Taxation University
TORTS LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL CANADA
SUMMARY LAWSKOOL CANADA CONTENTS Case list... 4 1. Introduction... 6 2. Negligence... 8 2.1 Elements of Tort of Negligence... 8 2.1.1 Duty of Care... 8 2.1.1.1 Step Test... 8 2.1.2 Breach of Duty... 8
Torts Outline Norwood, Fall 2003
Torts Outline Norwood, Fall 2003 I. Introduction to Torts a. Overview i. What is tort law? 1. Torts are wrongs recognized by law as grounds for a lawsuit. These wrongs always require that some form of
Cardozo as Tort Lawmaker
DePaul Law Review Volume 49 Issue 2 Winter 1999: Symposium - Judges as Tort Lawmakers Article 5 Cardozo as Tort Lawmaker Gary T. Schwartz Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review
What is a constitution? Do all democracies have them? Does a constitution protect citizens rights?
CONSTITUTIONALISM AND DEMOCRACY Alexander Kirshner Alexander.kirshner@duke.com Office Hours: Weds 10-11 Weds: 3:20-5:35 312 Perkins Library In December 2000, in a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court of the
MINUTES REGULAR SOAP LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. November 7, 2018
MINUTES REGULAR SOAP LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 7, 2018 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gravelle called the regular council meeting to order at 5:30 pm. ROLL CALL Council members present: Wellein, Still, Tweedy,
Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published
Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level LAW 9084/43 Paper 4 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 75 Published This mark scheme is published as an
POS 4931 Fall 2014 MWF 11:45AM-12:35PM PSY The 2014 Election. Office Hours MWF 1:30-2pm or by appointment
POS 4931 Fall 2014 MWF 11:45AM-12:35PM PSY 0130 The 2014 Election Dr. Michael McDonald Contact Info Office: Anderson 223 E-mail: michael.mcdonald@ufl.edu Phone: 352-273-2371 Office Hours MWF 1:30-2pm or
TOWNSHIP OF DENNIS COMMITTEE REORGANIZATION MEETING 2017 JANUARY 03, 2017, 6:30 P.M. DENNIS TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENNISVILLE, NJ
TOWNSHIP OF DENNIS COMMITTEE REORGANIZATION MEETING 2017 JANUARY 03, 2017, 6:30 P.M. DENNIS TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENNISVILLE, NJ The meeting was called to order by the Clerk, Jacqueline B. Justice.
Preface The Case Method Chapter Organizations Organization of the Text Acknowledgments The Nature, Purpose, And Constitutional Context Of Criminal
Preface The Case Method Chapter Organizations Organization of the Text Acknowledgments The Nature, Purpose, And Constitutional Context Of Criminal Law The Nature, Purpose, And Function Of Criminal Law
Contents. PART I Liability for Manufacturing Defects 1. Product Distributor s Strict Liability for Defect-Caused Harm 3
Preface to the Eighth Edition Acknowledgements xxi xxiii PART I Liability for Manufacturing Defects 1 CHAPTER ONE Product Distributor s Strict Liability for Defect-Caused Harm 3 A. The Role of Negligence
-1- ANNOUNCEMENTS Colorado Court of Appeals January 10, 2019
-1- COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Slip opinions are the opinions as filed by the judges with the clerk. Slip opinions are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. A link to
TORTS. University of Houston Spring, Deana Pollard-Sacks, Visiting Professor of Law
TORTS University of Houston Spring, 2013 Deana Pollard-Sacks, Visiting Professor of Law Cell phone: 713.927.9935 Email: professorpollard@comcast.net Class meets: Tu & Th 6:00 7:20 PM and Wed 7:30-8:50
L.L.M. (Previous) DEGREE EXAMINATION, MAY TORTS AND CRIMES
( D 1233 TCL) L.L.M. (Previous) DEGREE EXAMINATION, MAY 2007. TORTS AND CRIMES Paper II GENERAL THEORY AND PRINCIPLES OF TORT LIABILITY - I 1. Explain the term Tort distinguish between Tort and Crime,
Democratic Governance
DPI~403 Overview Democratic Governance - Pippa Norris Fall 2010 Structure 1. Aims and objectives 2. Class structure and schedule 3. Readings and resources 4. Assignments 5. Career opportunities 6. Bio
UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW FALL 2014 SYLLABUS August 16, Course Instructors:
UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW FALL 2014 SYLLABUS August 16, 2014 Course: Course Name Legislation LAW Code 748 Section NUMBER 550 Course Instructors: Bruce P. Martin, Esq. Office of the Attorney
Chapter 1. Development of Liability Based upon Fault... 1 Hulle v. Orynge (The Case of Thorns) Notes and Questions Weaver v. Ward...
TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE... V ACKNOWLEDGMENTS... IX TABLE OF CASES... XXXI Chapter 1. Development of Liability Based upon Fault... 1 Hulle v. Orynge (The Case of Thorns)... 4 Notes and Questions... 4
NEGLIGENCE. 1. Duty 2. Breach. 3. Causation 4. (Remoteness)
1. Duty 2. Breach NEGLIGENCE 3. Causation 4. (Remoteness) ISSUE Q: Did X s negligence cause Y s damage? RULE: Negligence is concerned with carelessness. To establish the tort of negligence, P must show:
ECN 211: PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS SYLLABUS FALL 2008
ECN 211: PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS SYLLABUS E-mail: Contact: gcahill@student.gc.maricopa.edu Brigida Banfelder, Economics department Administrative Assistant Hours: Mon Fri, 7:00a.m. 4:00 p.m. Phone:
CASEBOOK REVIEW. The Wide World of Torts: Reviewing Franklin & Rabin's Tort Law and Alternatives. Bernard W. Bell*
CASEBOOK REVIEW The Wide World of Torts: Reviewing Franklin & Rabin's Tort Law and Alternatives Bernard W. Bell* Tort Law and Alternatives authored by Stanford Law School professors Marc Franklin and Robert
THE RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS AND TRADITIONAL STRICT LIABILITY: ROBUST RATIONALES, SLENDER DOCTRINES
THE RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS AND TRADITIONAL STRICT LIABILITY: ROBUST RATIONALES, SLENDER DOCTRINES Kenneth W. Simons* INTRODUCTION Chapter 4 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical
Supreme Court of California 29 Cal.2d 541, 176 P.2d 1 (1946)
Torts Handouts ZASLOW v. KROENERT Supreme Court of California 29 Cal.2d 541, 176 P.2d 1 (1946) [Plaintiff and defendant received title to a house as tenants in common. A dispute over ownership arose, and
PUAD 540 PUBLIC POLICY PROCESS Founders Hall 477 Fall 2017
PUAD 540 PUBLIC POLICY PROCESS Founders Hall 477 Fall 2017 Dr. Timothy Conlan Research 328 Phone: 703-993-1427 email: tconlan@gmu.edu Office Hours: Tuesday: 3-4:00 (Fairfax) Wed: 6:30-7:15 (Arl) Thurs
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 97
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 97 Court of Appeals No. 12CA1074 Elbert County District Court No. 11CV36 Honorable Jeffrey K. Holmes, Judge Daniel Mikes, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lyndon D. Burnett, a/k/a
Torts--Negligence--Substantial Factor Test
Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 15 Issue 4 1964 Torts--Negligence--Substantial Factor Test Russell B. Mamone Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part
Tort Law as a Law of Civil Recourse
Vanderbilt University From the SelectedWorks of John Goldberg September 1, 2009 Tort Law as a Law of Civil Recourse John Goldberg, Harvard Law School Available at: https://works.bepress.com/john_goldberg/1/
Product Liability Reform Proposals In Washington-A Public Policy Analysis
Product Liability Reform Proposals In Washington-A Public Policy Analysis I. INTRODUCTION The current interest in statutory reform of product liability law' presents a unique opportunity for the Washington
Case study OLA Why was his claim under OLA 1957 rejected? 2. What was the alternative claim? 3. What did the first court decide?
Case study OLA 1957 In Poppleton v Trustees of the Portsmouth Youth Activities Committee 2008, a man fell and was badly injured while at an indoor climbing premises. He claimed under both the OLA 1957
IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * *
IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * * JANE HEALY, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CR09-100 vs. DEPT. NO.: 1 CHARLES RAYMOND, an individual, ALLEGRETTI
Intentional injuries to the person
Intentional injuries to the person Deals with trespass to the person, which has 3 forms: assault, battery and false imprisonment. Each is an individual tort in it s own right. The torts are actionable