Crossing State Lines -- the Ethics of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice

Similar documents
Crossing State Lines the Ethics of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice. Robert L. Theriot Liskow & Lewis

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF RULES GOVERNING MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE. B.J. Chisholm, Altshuler Berzon LLP

AMEMDMENTS TO COMMENTS 5 AND 13 OF RULE 5.5 PROPOSED BY VIRGINIA STATE BAR S MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE TASK FORCE ON MAY 21, 2013

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law

Report of the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee

ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion

A hypothetical will help develop the questions presented:

RULE UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF LAW; MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION FORUM ON THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE AND ABA MODEL RULE 5.5

UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW OPINIONS

Crossing State Lines Into The Unauthorized Practice Jungle. Del O'Roark, Loss Prevention Consultant, Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. of Ky.

LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT RULE XVII ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA

Multijurisdictional Practice. The widespread availability of the internet and the increasing affordability of video- and

Resolution. ABA Model Rule on Pro Hac Vice Admission

ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion

Who Wants To Be AN ETHICAL LAWYER?

ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 Revised Proposal - Outsourcing September 19, Resolution

Resolution. Client-Lawyer Relationship Rule 1.1 Competence

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE. IN RE: ) ) PETITION FOR THE ADOPTION OF ) RULES GOVERNING THE ) No. MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE ) OF LAW.

Index of Subjects. Created by: Neil Savage, JD Legal Publications Editor/Indexer th Ave NE Seattle, WA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 84 Article 1 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,257. In the Matter of JAMES M. ROSWOLD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

REPORT OF THE NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION THE NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION THE NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE A FOREIGN ATTORNEYS. Rule 1A:5. Virginia Corporate Counsel & Corporate Counsel Registrants.

INFORMAL OPINION

Rules 1.9, 1.9A (New Rule), and 2.1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i

Unauthorized Practice of Law Matrix Revised 2014

Internal Investigations: Practical and Ethical Concerns Facing In-House Counsel

ARDC SENIOR COUNSEL AUGUST 16-17, 2013

AUGUST 28, 1996 FORMAL OPINION 96-39

Tuesday 28th November, 2006.

Ethical Issues Arising in Alternative Dispute Resolution

DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TRIAL SKILLS SECTION March 8, By: Robert L. Tobey Johnston Tobey, P.C.

From: Jamie S. Gorelick and Michael Traynor, Co-Chairs ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20

Resolution. ABA Model Rule on Pro Hac Vice Admission

Unauthorized Practice of Law Matrix Revised 2015

LOSE WHEN UPL RUNS RAMPANT LAWYERS AND CONSUMERS. The Unauthorized Practice of Law: Arizona Timeline

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA AT RICHMOND IN THE MATTER OF SUPREME COURT RULES PART 6, II, RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 5.5 AND 8.

Approaching Reform: The Future of Multijurisdictional Practice in Today's Legal Profession

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE AND THE INFLUENCE OF MODEL RULE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 5.5 AN INTERIM ASSESSMENT

IMPACT OF THE NEW OHIO RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ON SOLO/SMALL FIRMS

A Call to Action: Turning the Golden State into a Golden Opportunity for International Arbitration

Many Hats, One Set of Rules: Ethical Beartraps for In-House Counsel

I Have A Case in Court, Now What? San Mateo County Superior Court

ADR LITIGATION OPINION 43 TO AFFECT OUT OF STATE ATTORNEYS SEEKING TO APPEAR IN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE PROCEEDINGS (ADR) IN NEW JERSEY

SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA. Atlanta June 11, The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed:

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

STATE BAR OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

UPL ADVISORY OPINION NO (March 2012)

Call to Action: Turning the Golden State into a Golden Opportunity for International Arbitration, A

Part 3 Authority to Practise Law

CHAPTER 12. EMERITUS ATTORNEYS PRO BONO PARTICIPATION PROGRAM GENERALLY RULE PURPOSE RULE DEFINITIONS

SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures

Outline of the Law Governing Lawyers Selection of Rules John Steele

In-House Ethics: Important Questions. Dorsey & Whitney. Dorsey & Whitney LLP. All Rights Reserved.

ETHICS OPINION

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION

Oregon State Bar Minimum Continuing Legal Education Rules and Regulations (As amended effective June 1, 2014)

FLORIDA BAR ETHICS OPINION OPINION May 1, Advisory ethics opinions are not binding.

CHAPTER 16. FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANCY RULE RULE PURPOSE RULE GENERAL CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS

Top Ten Ethics Issues (MCLE Specialty Credit in Ethics)

CALIFORNIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

California Judges Association OPINION NO. 38. (Originally issued: June 11, 1988) RETIRED JUDGES: JUDICIAL ASSIGNMENT WHILE ACTIVE MEMBERS OF STATE BAR

Coleman & Horowitt, LLP CLIENT MEMORANDUM. Discussing Issues of Interest to our Clients COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING COLLECTIONS

People v. Jerry R. Atencio. 16PDJ077. April 14, 2017.

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES

Pro Hac Vice: Procedure and Practice in Oregon

(e) Appearance of Attorney. An attorney may appear in a proceeding in any of the following ways:

Comparison of Newly Adopted Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules

ARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association

Assembly. June 22, Information Item Professional Ethics

RULE CHANGE 2015(02) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 18 Rules 205.3, 205.5, 205.6, 224, and 227. CHAPTER 20 Rules 251.1, 260.2, and

Alabama Center For Dispute Resolution Application for Registration on the Alabama Arbitrator Roster

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

CALIFORNIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Class Actions: Unique Issues, Unique Solutions

So, You re Thinking of Filing A Lawsuit? San Mateo County Superior Court

Frequently Asked Questions The Consumer Assistance Program

Upon acceptance to BNI, I agree to abide by the following Code of Ethics during the tenure of my participation in the organization:

A Commentary on the Ethics of the Legal Profession in the '50's

RULE 7.5: FIRM NAMES AND LETTERHEADS

Board of Governors. May 17, Agenda Item 97 Special Committee on Collaborative Law

Based upon these hypothetical facts you present the following questions for determination by the Committee:

REPORT OF THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SECTION OF THE COLORADO BAR ASSOCIATION

COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION WITH STATE VERSIONS AND AMENDMENTS SINCE AUGUST 2002

TRADEMARK ETHICS RESOURCE GUIDE PART 1: LIMITATIONS ON ATTORNEY CONDUCT. ABA Rule 4.2 Communication With Person Represented By Counsel

Advanced Licensing Agreements 2017

Tri-State Regional Special Education Law Conference November 2, 2017 Omaha, Nebraska

Please attach the following required documents:

NFA Arbitration: Resolving Customer Disputes

2017 All-Ohio Legal Forum. Succession Planning: What You Need to Know to Appoint a Successor Attorney for Your Practice

Louisiana State Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct Committee

Code of Professional Responsibility for Interpreters

DISCIPLINARY R~VIEW BOARD. February 29, 2016

Ethics in Employment Matters What are In-House Counsel s Ethical Obligations When Dealing With Employment Matters

2. Take control of the situation, while showing respect for clients. 3. Establish a serious and professional tone for every notarization

Legal Referral Service Rules for Panel Membership

Transcription:

15th Annual Energy Litigation Conference November 3, 2016 Institute for Energy Law of The Center for American and International Law Crossing State Lines -- the Ethics of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice Robert L. Theriot Liskow & Lewis Houston Texas 1

Original Model Rule 5.5 A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction or assist another in doing so. 2

Original Model Rule 5.5 Translation: Don t do in another state What you re are not suppose to do there Or help someone else do that to 3

Original Model Rule 5.5 Comment: Rule 5.05 leaves the definition [of unauthorized practice] to judicial development. 4

Original Model Rule 5.5 Spivak v. Sachs, 16 N.Y.2d 163, 263 N.Y.S.2d 953 (1965) California attorney represented New York client in New York divorce Unauthorized practice Barred from collecting fee 5

Original Model Rule 5.5 Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County, 949 P.2d 1 (Cal. 1998) New York lawyer represented California client in California arbitration Unauthorized practice Barred from collecting fee 6

Revised ABA Model Rule 5.5 Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law (a) A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction, or assist another in doing so. (b) A lawyer who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction shall not: (1) except as authorized by these Rules or other law, establish an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of law; or (2) hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction. (c) A lawyer admitted in another United States jurisdiction, and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction, may provide legal services on a temporary basis in this jurisdiction that: (1) are undertaken in association with a lawyer who is admitted to practice in this jurisdiction and who actively participates in the matter; (2) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential proceeding before a tribunal in this or another jurisdiction, if the lawyer, or a person the lawyer is assisting, is authorized by law or order to appear in such proceeding or reasonably expects to be so authorized; (3) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential arbitration, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution proceeding in this or another jurisdiction, if the services arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer s practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission; or (4) are not within paragraphs (c)(2) or (c)(3) and arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer s practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice. (d) A lawyer admitted in another United States jurisdiction, and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction, may provide legal services in this jurisdiction that: (1) are provided to the lawyer s employer or its organizational affiliates and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission; or (2) are services that the lawyer is authorized to provide by federal law or other law of this jurisdiction. 7

To summarize: Revised Model Rule 5.5 States the obvious can t establish office or systematic and continuous presence or hold one s self out to the public as licensed Can practice in safe harbors for certain temporary, in-house, and federal practices 8

Revised Model Rule 5.5 CAN T DO ESTABLISH OFFICE OR CONTINUING PRESENCE???? CAN DO CERTAIN TEMPORARY IN-HOUSE OR FEDERAL PRACTICES 9

Continuous Presence What is an office? Satellite office staffed by local lawyers? Work in out-of-state office, but practice limited to home state? Reside in one state, work in another? Bona Fide Office rules Virtual offices? Semi-retired? 10

Continuous Presence Systematic and Continuous Conduct? International Shoe v. Washington Rule 5.5 Comment: There is no single test to determine whether a lawyer s services are provided on a temporary basis in this jurisdiction, and may therefore be permissible under paragraph (c). Services may be temporary even though the lawyer provides services in this jurisdiction on a recurring basis, or for an extended period of time, as when the lawyer is representing a client in a single lengthy negotiation or litigation. 11

Continuous Presence Systematic and Continuous What are disciplinary committees and courts looking for? Competing with local attorneys fo clients Advertising, solicitation, and virtual presence Continuing physical presence Practice involving host state s law (somewhat) 12

Temporary Presence May provide on a temporary basis + 1. Associate with local counsel 2. Permitted litigation activities 3. Permitted arbitration practices 4. Related to your home practice SAFE HARBOR CATCH- ALL 13

Local Counsel Must be actively engaged Must be temporary 14

Pro Hac Vice Litigation MR 5.5(c)(2): are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential proceeding before a tribunal in this or another jurisdiction, if the lawyer, or a person the lawyer is assisting, is authorized by law or order to appear in such proceeding or reasonably expects to be so authorized 15

Pro Hac Vice Litigation Pre-litigation and ancillary activities Assisting attorneys don t need to be admitted pro hac vice Litigation anywhere authorizes work everywhere 16

Pro Hac Vice Litigation Do you need local counsel anywhere? 17

Pro Hac Vice Litigation Ethical rules are not substitute for local pro hac vice rules Be wary of numerical limitations on pro hac admissions 18

Arbitration and ADR reasonably related to a pending or potential arbitration, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution proceeding if the services arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer s home state practice are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission many states have modified this part of the model rule 19

Rule 5.5(c)(4) Catch-All Temporary legal activities that arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer s practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice. Covers transactional & non-litigation matters 20

Rule 5.5(c)(4) Catch-All What is reasonably related to your home practice? Location of client most important Prior relationship with client Where services performed Multi-state transactions Expertise in specialized/uniform law Which state s law governs? Read ABA comments Double-check host state s rule (some variations) Not a lot of caselaw/ethics opinion guidance 21

In House Counsel Legal services that are provided to the lawyer s employer or its organizational affiliates and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission Covers work for all affiliates Does not cover litigation in host state Must be admitted in good standing in at least one state 22

In House Counsel Local Registration Requirements (See ABA site) Tex. Board of Legal Examiners Policy Stmt: Represent only employer Register with state Can t appear in court Can t prepare any legal instrument affecting title to real estate Landman work not legal services 23

In House Counsel Special Issues One-client rule Pro bono exceptions some states Residency requirements Ethics rules allow practice everywhere but not registration rules May have to resort to other temporary exceptions and safe harbors Pro hac vice rules different in each state Most states reserve pro hac vice for out-of-state residents In-house counsel in Texas cannot get admitted pro hac vice in Texas 24

In House Counsel Special Issues 25

Federal practices are services that the lawyer is authorized to provide by federal law or other law of this jurisdiction Cover court and administrative practices Federal admission rules trump state rules But, be cautious about continuous presence in host state. In re Desilets, 291 F.3d 925 (6th Cir. 2002. 26

Areas that raise questions Real Estate: A number of cases (mostly involving brokers and other non-lawyers) make clear that preparation of land instruments is the practice of law. Some state rules specifically prohibit out-of-state lawyers from preparing real estate instruments: e.g. Texas Government Code 83.001 (non-texas lawyer may not collect a fee for preparing documents affecting title to real property except mineral leases and deeds) 27

Areas that raise questions Depositions: Deposition Location Lawsuit location Lawsuit Out-of-State (and no pro hac vice admission) Lawsuit Out-of-State (but admitted pro hac vice) Deposition in Home State Unclear may be OK ethically but can cause problems in court OK permitted by pro hac vice rule and arguably not multijurisdictional practice Deposition Out-of-State Prohibited Unauthorized Practice of Law OK permitted by pro hac vice rule and Rule 5.5(c)(2) Lawsuit in Home State OK Not multijurisdictional practice OK Permitted by Rule 5.5(c)(2) 28

Areas that raise questions What about Texas (which hasn t adopted Model Rule)? If you are Texas lawyer you are ok (look to law of other states) If you are visiting Texas --??? 29

Areas that raise questions What will happen to me? Loss of fees & malpractice risk Disqualification, sanctions, striking of pleadings Ethical sanctions in home state Dual enforcement rules becoming more prominent Disqualification from future bar applications 30

Areas that raise questions Can I offer an opinion on another State s law? Yes More an issue of Competency 31

15th Annual Energy Litigation Conference November 3, 2016 Institute for Energy Law of The Center for American and International Law Crossing State Lines -- the Ethics of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice Robert L. Theriot Liskow & Lewis Houston Texas 32