Internal Investigations: Practical and Ethical Concerns Facing In-House Counsel
|
|
- Candace Nelson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Internal Investigations: Practical and Ethical Concerns Facing In-House Counsel Presented by: Colin Folawn and Brian Keeley December 10, 2014
2 Caveats Not intended to create an attorney-client relationship or state the standard of care Keep hypotheticals hypothetical Seek counsel for a particular issue
3 Objections Discuss ethical implications involved in internal investigations Provide tips for preserving attorney-client privilege and client confidentiality Identify common problems and provide suggestions to reduce risk
4 Preliminary considerations
5 In-house counsel defined Licensed attorney (in some U.S. venue) Employed by a single company To provide legal advice solely for that company (and possibly its affiliates)
6 Which ethics rules control & when? Representing a client Not representing a client Serving as in-house counsel Other jurisdictions rules can apply See RPC 8.5
7 What is an investigation? Inquiry, analysis, or fact gathering To inform a decision about How to respond to a question or concern Regarding company action
8 Common Types of Investigations Employment Whistleblower Administrative Litigation
9 Investigation triggers Lawsuit Complaint Workplace accident Anomaly revealed by an audit Failure in a process Data breach or other technology failure Loss of property/data
10 Who should investigate? Non-lawyer constituent/employee? In-house counsel? External non-lawyer investigator? Outside counsel?
11 What should I considering in deciding who will investigate?
12 Request for Investigation VP meets with Lawyer and Other Lawyer VP says, we have a complaint that I need one of you to investigate; here are the facts. Other Lawyer says, sorry, but I can t; I just gave two weeks notice
13 Request for Investigation (cont d) Lawyer says, I m on it Other Lawyer interviews for a job Interviewer asks, were you ever asked to conduct investigations at your former job? Other Lawyer describes the facts
14 Request for Investigation (cont d) Was the request protected by the attorneyclient privilege? Is it still protected after the interview? Was the request confidential? Is it still? Who was Lawyer s client? Was that clear?
15 Which is most broad? A. Attorney-client privilege B. RPC 1.6 confidentiality C. Work product protection (attorney and non-attorney)
16 Client confidentiality is the most broad.
17 Attorney-client privilege
18 Attorney-client privilege (generally) Confidential communication Between attorney and client (or representatives) For the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice
19 Privilege as a matter of state law Different states laws might be invoked to determine or evaluate privilege In which states does the company act? Where might a lawsuit arise?
20 Local privilege statutes Washington: RCW (2) Oregon: ORS
21 The primary purpose test Adding a lawyer to create privilege? Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 501 F. Supp. 2d 789 (E.D. La. 2007) When and how should counsel be involved?
22 Client confidentiality (RPC 1.6) A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client Unless The client gives informed consent, The disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation, or An exception under RPC 1.6(b) applies
23 Protected information (ORPC 1.0(f)) Information protected by the attorney-client privilege under applicable law, and Other information gained in a current or former professional relationship that The client has requested be held inviolate or The disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client
24 Protected information (Washington) Wash. RPC 1.6 cmt. 19: Information relating to the representation includes, but is not necessarily limited to, confidences and secrets. Confidence means information protected by the attorney-client privilege under applicable law
25 Protected info (Wash.) (cont d) Wash. RPC 1.6 cmt. 19: Secret means other information gained in the professional relationship that the client has requested be held inviolate or the disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client
26 Protected info (Wash.) (cont d) Wash. RPC 1.6 cmt. 3: The confidentiality rule, for example, applies not only to matters communicated in confidence by the client but also to all information relating to the representation, whatever its source.
27 More reading on confidentiality Jamila A. Johnson, Pillow Talk: The Obligations of RPC 1.6, available at Newsletters-Brochures/~/media/Files/News_Events/Publications /Bar%20News/2012%20Full%20Issues/201211NovemberBar News.ashx#page=13of64 (November 2012) Doug Ende, Clarifying All the Talk About Pillow Talk, at (November 19, 2012)
28 What if the witnesses are outside the state?
29 Multijurisdictional practice A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction, or assist another in doing so. RPC 5.5(a)
30 What about in-house counsel? A lawyer admitted in another United States jurisdiction, and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction, may provide legal services in this jurisdiction that: (1) are provided to the lawyer s employer or its organizational affiliates and are (i) provided on a temporary basis and (ii) not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission; or (2) are services that the lawyer is authorized to provide by federal law or other law of this jurisdiction. RPC 5.5(d)
31 Excerpts of important comments Other than as authorized by law or this Rule, a lawyer who is not admitted to practice generally in this jurisdiction violates paragraph (b) if the lawyer establishes an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of law. RPC 5.5 cmt. 4 Presence may be systematic and continuous even if the lawyer is not physically present here. Such a lawyer must not hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction. RPC 5.5 cmt 4
32 More caveats and comments RPC 5.5 (d)(1) does not authorize the provision of personal legal services to the employer s officers or employees. See RPC 5.5 cmt. 16 In Washington, paragraph (d)(1) applies to lawyers who are providing the services on a temporary basis only. If an employed lawyer establishes an office or other systematic presence in this jurisdiction for the purpose of rendering legal services to the employer, the lawyer must seek general admission through APR 3 or house counsel admission under APR 8(f). RPC 5.5 cmt. 17
33 Organizational confidentiality RPC 1.13 cmt. 2: When one of the constituents of an organizational client communicates with the organization s lawyer in that person s organizational capacity, the communication is protected by Rule 1.6.
34 Org. client confidentiality (cont d) RPC 1.13 cmt. 2: if an organizational client requests its lawyer to investigate allegations of wrongdoing, interviews made in the course of that investigation between the lawyer and the client s employees or other constituents are covered by Rule 1.6. This does not mean that the organization s constituents are the lawyer s clients
35 Org. client confidentiality (cont d) RPC 1.13 cmt. 2: The lawyer may not disclose to such constituents information relating to the representation except for disclosures explicitly or impliedly authorized by the organizational client in order to carry out the representation or as otherwise permitted by Rule 1.6.
36 Identify the client The existence of an attorney-client relationship turns largely on the client s subjective belief that it exists In re McGlothlen, 99 Wn.2d 515, 522, 663 P.2d 1330 (1983) Subjective belief does not control unless it is reasonably formed based on the circumstances, including the attorney s words or actions Bohn v. Cody, 119 Wn.2d 357, 363, 832 P.2d 71 (1992)
37 Reducing risk at project inception Clearly identify the client Disclaim representing non-clients (constituents) Identify the work with specificity What will you do What will you not do
38 Roadmap: Investigation steps Triggering event Initial interview with the source / complainant Planning the remainder of the investigation Interviewing witnesses and the target (if any) Reviewing documents or other information Analyzing all information Report and recommendations
39 A Simple Investigation Employee complains to Lawyer, not HR Discrimination and retaliation based on national origin, religion, and age Employee claims that a supervisor made derogatory comments based on these characteristics
40 A Simple Investigation (cont d) Employee also claims that the supervisor unjustifiably gave negative feedback HR Pro is asked to investigate and report to Lawyer because Supervisor faced similar complaints before
41 Initial interview with complainant Purposes of the initial interview: Identify the issues to be investigated Often a legitimate complaint will be combined with many other ancillary complaints that need no investigation Gather as much information as possible Identifying possible witnesses, documents, sources of information
42 Tips for initial interviews Disclaim representation and clarify roles Who, what, where, when, why, how Use an unbiased, non-judgmental tone Encourage candor Do not provide legal advice Confidentiality: Ask for it Confidentiality: Don t promise it
43 Documenting interviews Take good notes Consider Obtaining written witness statements Writing a summary memo to the witness Writing a summary memo for future analysis
44 Results of Initial Interview Complainant gives a long, detailed story about months of derogatory comments, sometimes with other people around Complainant identifies others with knowledge
45 Results of Initial Interview (cont d) Complainant describes two coaching memos about his interactions with customers, which happened with other people around Complainant wants supervisor fired
46 Post-interview planning Clarify or update Scope of the investigation Purpose of the investigation Identify Additional witness interviews Documents and other sources of information
47 Planning the investigation Purpose and scope: Specific complaints that complainant raised Interviews: Supervisor ( target ) Witnesses to each event Documents: Coaching forms Personnel file Supervisor s notes or file
48 Interviewing witnesses Plan each interview beforehand Consider the order of interviews Begin each interview with a general explanation for the purpose of the interview, but without sharing specific allegations
49 Interviewing witnesses Do not promise confidentiality Ask for their confidentiality Remind them that they will not be retaliated against for providing information Maintain an even, unbiased, non-judgmental tone
50 How should an in-house lawyer explain his or her role in an investigation?
51 Are interviews and facts protected by privilege or confidentiality?
52 What privilege, confidentiality, or privacy issues pertain to Lawyer s document review?
53 Interviews and Documents Supervisor denies making derogatory comments Most witnesses deny hearing derogatory comments, but one witness disagrees Most witnesses to customer interaction provided denied hearing anything amiss
54 Interviews and Documents (cont d) One witness thinks complainant s interaction with customers was subpar Supervisor has only the coaching forms, and discarded his own notes
55 Analysis and recommendations Once all information is gathered, analyze it Try to determine what happened If stories conflict, weigh witness credibility Make a recommendation on an issue only if you have been asked to do so
56 Analysis and Report HR Pro prepares written memo Summarizing the complaint and interview Summarizing witness interviews Identifying inconsistencies in statements Assessing witnesses credibility
57 Analysis and Report (cont d) The memo also Explains conclusions regarding derogatory comments and negative coaching Recommends offering complainant a transfer Recommends no discipline for supervisor, but recommends training for supervisor on people skills and coaching
58 Is HR Pro s report to Lawyer privileged or confidential?
59 Is Lawyer a Witness? Lawyer provides analysis and recommendation to VP Litigation commences Lawyer receives subpoena
60 Responding to subpoenas and related tips
61 More hypothetical scenarios
62 The Assignment Lawyer Bob works as in-house counsel for CashMoneyCallz.com Bob meets with CEO, who says I ve heard a wild rumor that some employees are making false statements on sales calls I want you to get to the bottom of it
63 The Assignment (cont d) As to some employees, Bob must: Search their offices after 5:00 p.m., Review their messages, Interview them, and Tap into and monitor their sales calls Some of the employees are out of state Bob says: Sounds like fun. I m on it!
64 Any problems?
65 Obtaining evidence: RPC 4.4(a) In representing a client, a lawyer shall not Use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person
66 Obtaining evidence (cont d) What if the evidence was stolen and provided to Lawyer? RPC 4.4(b) See Ore. Formal Op
67 Other potential problems Who is the client? Are there any conflicts of interest? RPC 1.7 What is the scope of representation? RPC 1.2
68 Conflicts of Interest [A] lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest RPC 1.7(a) Concurrent conflicts: The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. RPC 1.7(b)
69 The Employee Interviews Bob meets with Employee and says: CEO told me to meet with you Don t worry; anything that you tell me will remain confidential Attorney-client privilege protects our communications
70 The Employee Interviews (cont d) Bob then asks a series of questions about business practices Employee admits making false statements in telephone sales solicitations Employee asks, could I get in legal trouble for this?
71 How should Bob respond? Should Bob have done anything differently?
72 Inadvertent representation risks Multiple, possibly conflicting duties Conflicts of interest (RPC 1.7, RPC 1.13) Unclear (and broad) scope of representation
73 Other concerns Dealing with unrepresented persons RPC 4.3 Clarifying the lawyer s role RPC 1.13(f) RPC 1.13 cmts. 10, 11
74 Dual representation (RPC 1.13(g)) A lawyer may also represent constituents, including a principal officer or major shareholder But if consent is required under RPC 1.7, consent must come from one other than the person to be represented
75 Lawyer investigations (generally) Engagement letters can make a difference Sandra T.E. v. S. Berwyn Sch. Dist. 100, 600 F.3d 612, 618 (7th Cir. 2009) Predominantly legal, not business North Am. Mort. Invs. v. First Wis. Nat l Bank, 69 F.R.D. 9 (E.D. Wis. 1975)
76 Lawyer investigations (cont d) Acting as a conduit of information In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 616 F.3d 1172 (10th Cir. 2010) The burden will be on the party who resists discovery
77 Notifying the Insurer CEO receives a demand letter from Customer, who threatens to file a lawsuit for unfair or deceptive business practices CEO instructs Bob to place the company s insurance carrier on notice of the potential claim
78 Notifying the Insurer (cont d) Bob forwards demand to Insurer, along with a cover letter describing the claim Insurer acknowledges receipt and requests that Bob investigate the claim Bob says that the investigation is already underway
79 Notifying the Insurer (cont d) The Insurer requests copies of all of Bob s documents and Bob s analysis as it is developed Bob forwards all notes and materials to Insurer
80 Notifying the Insurer (cont d) Customer files lawsuit Customer subpoenas documents from the company, to include Bob s investigative materials
81 Insurers and privilege John J. Manier, The Attorney-Client Privilege and Its Availability to Insured Persons, 36 UCLA L. Rev. 977 (1989) Heidebrink v. Moriwaki, 104 Wn.2d 392, 706 P.2d 212 (1985)
82 Insurers and privilege (cont d) Know your jurisdiction Understand the tripartite relationship Know the identity of your client or clients Evaluate foundation for confidentiality
83 A Change of Course Administrator stops by Bob s office, saying somewhat nervously: I ve heard that you re looking into the lies that our telemarketers make I know that CEO is in on it I bugged his office Administrator gives the tape to Bob
84 A Change of Course (cont d) Administrator asks: What do we do now? I know I can trust you. You won t tell CEO that I was the one who gave you the tape, right? Bob says: You can trust me. My investigation won t leave the company.
85 A Change of Course (cont d) Bob listens to the tape, which implicates CEO in the fraudulent practice Bob confronts CEO and asks for an explanation CEO says that the tape is obviously phony
86 A Change of Course (cont d) Bob says that it sounds quite authentic CEO grows angry, saying: If you tell anyone that I m somehow involved in this, I will have no choice but to let you go I have no confidence in a lawyer I can t trust to keep matters confidential
87 What should Lawyer do?
88 Reporting up the chain (RPC 1.13) Actual knowledge of Intention to act Engagement in act Refusal to act
89 Reporting up the chain (cont d) In a matter that is A violation of a legal obligation to the organization A violation of law which reasonably might be imputed to the organization And is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization
90 Reporting up the chain (cont d) [T]hen the lawyer shall proceed as is reasonably necessary in the best interest of the organization. Unless reasonably believed unnecessary, the lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization
91 Reporting up the chain (cont d) May also reveal certain information in very limited circumstances, but not with investigative matters or defense matters RPC 1.13(c), (d) If the lawyer withdraws or is fired because of RPC 1.13(b) or (c) action, then lawyer shall proceed as reasonably believed necessary to assure that the organization s highest authority is informed of the discharge
92 Other resources WSBA Ethics Line: OSB General Counsel: Edna Selan Epstein, The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work-Product Doctrine (5 th ed. ABA 2007)
93 Discussion
94 Adjournment
Many Hats, One Set of Rules: Ethical Beartraps for In-House Counsel
Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients 777 E. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee,WI 53202 414.271.2400 Many Hats, One
More informationQuestions: 1. May Lawyer file an affidavit for change of judge against Judge X in Defendant s case?
FORMAL OPINION NO -193 Candor, Independent Professional Judgment, Communication, Seeking Disqualification of Judges Facts: Lawyer practices primarily in ABC County and represents Defendant in a personal-injury
More informationManaging a Corporate Crisis:
Managing a Corporate Crisis: Strategies for Containing a Crisis and Controlling the Public Narrative While Meeting Ethical Obligations and Maintaining Privilege June 15, 2017 Vincent Cohen Hector Gonzalez
More informationINTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS. Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP
INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP I. The use of internal investigations has increased significantly. Based on
More informationWho Wants To Be AN ETHICAL LAWYER?
Who Wants To Be AN ETHICAL LAWYER? April 2017 HYPOTHETICAL 1 John is a lawyer licensed to practice law in Washington DC John just relocated to Michigan as in-house counsel of ABC Utility John never plans
More informationIn-House Ethics: Important Questions. Dorsey & Whitney. Dorsey & Whitney LLP. All Rights Reserved.
In-House Ethics: Important Questions Ella Solomons Deloitte Kenneth L. Jorgensen David C. Singer Dorsey & Whitney Overall Responsibility A law firm... shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that all lawyers
More informationSARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS
SARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS DEBRA G. HATTER, Houston Haynes & Boone State Bar Of Texas 2 ND ANNUAL ADVANCED IN-HOUSE COUNSEL COURSE August 14-15, 2003 San Antonio, Texas CHAPTER 9
More informationThe Trusted Advisor's Dilemma: Maintaining the Attorney Client Privilege as In-House Counsel. The Attorney-Client Privilege
The Trusted Advisor's Dilemma: Maintaining the Attorney Client Privilege as In-House Counsel Labor & Employment Law Seminar June 9, 2011 Linda Walton Chelsea Dwyer Petersen The Attorney-Client Privilege
More informationTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT The Attorney Conduct Rules (Section 307) DELVACCA Annual General Counsel Forum Union League of Philadelphia
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT The Attorney Conduct Rules (Section 307) DELVACCA Annual General Counsel Forum Union League of Philadelphia September 16, 2003 Section 307 of Sarbanes-Oxley: OVERVIEW Requires the
More informationETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL
ETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL GUEST SPEAKERS SARAH MENENDEZ Senior Litigation Counsel T +1.713.918.1039 sarah_menendez@bmc.com SEAN GORMAN Trial Partner T +1.713.221.1221 sean.gorman@bracewell.com
More informationSELECT ILLINOIS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONALISM The Buck Stops Here: Ethics and Professionalism for In-House Counsel SELECT ILLINOIS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT The Rules listed below are those
More informationPUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY
1 Policy Statement At Tourism and Events Queensland (TEQ), we believe that Public Interest Disclosures (PIDs) and the ability to make such disclosures without retaliation or reprisal is critically important,
More informationNRMLA Code of Ethics & Professional Responsibility Ethics and Standards Complaint Procedures (As Revised June 16, 2009)
NRMLA Code of Ethics & Professional Responsibility Ethics and Standards Complaint Procedures (As Revised June 16, 2009) Preamble and Applicability The NRMLA Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibility
More informationPrivileges and In-House Counsel: A User s Guide
Privileges and In-House Counsel: A User s Guide William M. Bosch, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Thomas C. Indelicarto, VeriSign Inc. Robert N. Weiner, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer January 11, 2017 apks.com
More informationCrossing State Lines -- the Ethics of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice
15th Annual Energy Litigation Conference November 3, 2016 Institute for Energy Law of The Center for American and International Law Crossing State Lines -- the Ethics of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice Robert
More informationProposed Rule 3.8 [RPC 5-110] Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor (XDraft # 11, 7/25/10)
Proposed Rule 3.8 [RPC 5-110] Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor (XDraft # 11, 7/25/10) Summary: This amended rule states the responsibilities of a prosecutor to assure that charges are supported
More informationFORMAL OPINION NO Accessing Information about Third Parties through a Social Networking Website
FORMAL OPINION NO 2013-189 Accessing Information about Third Parties through a Social Networking Website Facts: Lawyer wishes to investigate an opposing party, a witness, or a juror by accessing the person
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION COMMISSION ON ETHICS 20/20 STANDING COMMITTEE ON CLIENT PROTECTION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE STANDING
More informationEthics for Municipal Attorneys
LEAGUE OF WISCONSIN MUNICIPALITIES 2018 MUNICIPAL ATTORNEYS INSTITUTE June 20, 2018 Ethics for Municipal Attorneys Presented by: Dean R. Dietrich, Esq. Ruder Ware L.L.S.C. P.O. Box 8050 Wausau, WI 54402-8050
More informationResponding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP Today s Agenda Corporate Criminal Liability Enforcement Environment General
More informationA Message to Legal Personnel
A Message to Legal Personnel Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted Part 205, an extensive set of rules that impose new obligations on attorneys (both in-house attorneys and outside
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Formal Opinion 92-369 December 7, 1992 Disposition of Deceased Sole Practitioners Client Files and Property To fulfill
More informationCurrent Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions:
Current Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions: The Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Protection, and Rules of Professional Conduct 1.6 & 2.3 Presenters: John K. Villa & Charles Davant Williams &
More informationEffective January 1, 2016
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA Effective January 1, 2016 SECTION 1: PURPOSE The primary purposes of character and fitness screening before
More informationCONDUCTING LAWFUL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT
CONDUCTING LAWFUL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT By Jennifer C. McGarey Secretary and Assistant General Counsel US Airways, Inc. and Tom A. Jerman O
More informationWhat Can You Say? Talking with Unrepresented Persons
September 2013 Multnomah Lawyer Ethics Focus What Can You Say? Talking with Unrepresented Persons By Mark J. Fucile Fucile & Reising LLP Lawyers frequently cross professional paths with a wide variety
More informationDALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TRIAL SKILLS SECTION March 8, By: Robert L. Tobey Johnston Tobey, P.C.
DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TRIAL SKILLS SECTION March 8, 2013 By: Robert L. Tobey Johnston Tobey, P.C. www.johnstontobey.com A. Lawyers owe their clients a fiduciary duty. Breach of fiduciary duty involves
More informationFORMAL OPINION NO Scope of Representation; Limiting the Scope
FORMAL OPINION NO 2011-183 Scope of Representation; Limiting the Scope Facts: Lawyer A is asked by Client X for assistance in preparing certain pleadings to be filed in court. Client X does not otherwise
More informationABA Formal Opinion October 8, 2009
ABA Formal Opinion 09-455 October 8, 2009 Disclosure of Conflicts Information When Lawyers Move Between Law Firms When a lawyer moves between law firms, both the moving lawyer and the prospective new firm
More informationETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRO BONO LAWYERS Prepared by Attorney Patricia Zeeh Risser LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRO BONO LAWYERS Prepared by Attorney Patricia Zeeh Risser LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN for the Marquette Volunteer Legal Clinic Lawyer and Student Volunteers December 11, 2008
More informationDANGER ZONE: THE NO CONTACT RULE IN CONDEMNATION LITIGATION
DANGER ZONE: THE NO CONTACT RULE IN CONDEMNATION LITIGATION ---------- Oregon Eminent Domain Conference Portland May 19, 2011 Mark J. Fucile Fucile & Reising LLP 115 NW 1 st Avenue, Suite 401 Portland,
More informationPRIVILEGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
PRIVILEGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS March 27, 2015 ISBA Government Practice Seminar Timothy J. Hill Copyright 2014 Bradley & Riley PC - All rights reserved. Privileges and Ethical Considerations 1. Attorney-Client
More informationAUGUST 28, 1996 FORMAL OPINION 96-39
AUGUST 28, 1996 FORMAL OPINION 96-39 The, Coordinator of the Committee on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, has referred to me, a member of that Committee, your law firm's inquiry concerning
More informationWhat Keeps You Up at Night?
What Keeps You Up at Night? Issues of Fraud and Abuse Compliance Series Keeping In House Out of the Doghouse Invoking the Attorney- Client Privilege 37 Offices in 18 Countries 2 Keeping In House Out of
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
E-FILED 2014 JAN 02 736 PM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY BELLE OF SIOUX CITY, L.P., v. Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant MISSOURI RIVER HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT,
More informationINVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS
INVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS Wes Bearden, CEO Attorney & Licensed Investigator Bearden Investigative Agency, Inc. www.beardeninvestigations.com PRIVILEGE KEY POINTS WE ALL KNOW
More informationDISQUALIFICATION OF THE ADVOCATE/WITNESS Adopted June 18, 1988 Revised June 18, 1994, May 10, 1997 and October 20, 2012
As revised by Editing Subcommittee 2/20/2013 78 DISQUALIFICATION OF THE ADVOCATE/WITNESS Adopted June 18, 1988 Revised June 18, 1994, May 10, 1997 and October 20, 2012 Introduction and Scope This opinion
More informationThe interviewing of employees and ex-employees before and during litigation
CONDUCTING INFORMAL INTERVIEWS OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE DEFENDANT EMPLOYER by Alan H. Schorr Alan H. Schorr & Associates, P.C. 5 Split Rock Drive Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08003 (856)874-9090 E-Mail: schorrlawnj@aol.com
More informationCommittee Opinion May 3, 2011 THIRD PARTIES IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1814 UNDISCLOSED RECORDING OF THIRD PARTIES IN CRIMINAL MATTERS In this hypothetical, a Criminal Defense Lawyer represents A who is charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled
More informationTIPS & STRATEGIES FOR PERFORMING HR INVESTIGATIONS. Presented by Chrys A. Martin
TIPS & STRATEGIES FOR PERFORMING HR INVESTIGATIONS Presented by Chrys A. Martin chrysmartin@dwt.com 503-778-5357 Investigation Triggers Harassment/discrimination; Violence; Theft; Drug or Alcohol Abuse;
More informationPUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF CHELAN COUNTY GOVERNANCE POLICIES
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF CHELAN COUNTY Originally Adopted May 2, 2005 and Amended Over Time Amended and Restated January 24, 2011 Amended September 19, 2011 Amended June 4, 2012 Amended February
More informationLegal Ethics Issues for Compliance Officers
Legal Ethics Issues for Compliance Officers April 26, 2018 Hruska Law Center Lincoln, NE This page intentionally left blank. Faculty Bios Paul McGreal, J.D., joined Creighton University School of Law on
More informationThe Art and Ethics of Cross-Examination Outline
I. Cross-Examination The Art and Ethics of Cross-Examination a. What Is It? Cross-examination is the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth. You can do anything with a bayonet except
More informationRPC 4.2 s NO CONTACT RULE: Who You Can & Can t Talk to on the Other Side. Mark J. Fucile
RPC 4.2 s NO CONTACT RULE: Who You Can & Can t Talk to on the Other Side Mark J. Fucile Fucile & Reising LLP 115 NW First Ave., Suite 401 Portland, OR 97209 503.224.4895 mark@frllp.com www.frllp.com Oregon
More informationBased upon these hypothetical facts you present the following questions for determination by the Committee:
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1838 CAN AN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL FOR A CORPORATION PROVIDE LEGAL SERVICES TO A SISTER CORPORATION AND CAN THAT CORPORATION COLLECT REIMBURSEMENT FOR THOSE SERVICES FROM THE SISTER CORPORATION?
More informationImpact of DOJ's Corporate Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Strategies On Providers and Defense Counsel
Impact of DOJ's Corporate Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Strategies On Providers and Defense Counsel David Douglass Partner, Sheppard Mullin William Pericak Partner, Jenner & Block LLP Leo Reichert Exec.
More informationEvaluating the Demand Letter
Evaluating the Demand Letter and What To Do After You Receive It May 15, 2018 Christine B. Lucy, Associate General Counsel, Booz Allen Hamilton Deborah Kelly, Partner, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP Nigel
More informationMISCONDUCT. Committee Opinion May 11, 1993
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1528 OBLIGATION TO REPORT ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT. You have presented a hypothetical situation in which Attorney (P) is employed by a law firm and is contacted by a client to represent
More informationOregon RPC 1.16 provides, in part:
FORMAL OPINION NO 2009-182 Conflict of Interest: Current Client s Filing of Bar Complaint; Withdrawal Facts: Lawyer represents Client in a matter set for trial. One week before trial is scheduled to begin,
More informationFocus on the O in E&O
Focus on the O in E&O Stephanie Rubino, Assistant Vice President & Assistant Counsel and Kirk J. Raslowsky, Senior Vice President & Associate General Counsel I. Introduction E&O or Errors & Omissions are
More informationLegal Ethics: Unauthorized Practice of Law. CONTACT US
Legal Ethics: Unauthorized Practice of Law CONTACT US info@paralegaleducationgroup.com Lecture Agenda Basic Paralegal No-No s Ethical Rules Pertaining to Non-Lawyer Assistants Defining the Practice of
More informationAPRIL 2017 RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VIOLENCE POLICY
APRIL 2017 RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VIOLENCE POLICY The Royal Canadian Golf Association, operating as ( ), is committed to providing a sport and work environment that
More informationTechnology and the Threat to the Attorney- Client Privilege Suzanne Valdez
Technology and the Threat to the Attorney- Client Privilege Suzanne Valdez May 17-18, 2018 University of Kansas School of Law Technology and the Threat to the Attorney-Client Privilege Recent Developments
More informationDefense Counsel's Duties When Client Insists On Testifying Falsely
Ethics Opinion 234 Defense Counsel's Duties When Client Insists On Testifying Falsely Rule 3.3(a) prohibits the use of false testimony at trial. Rule 3.3(b) excepts from this prohibition false testimony
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Professional Responsibility And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question In 1995, Lawyer
More informationCase 3:16-cv JAM Document 50 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Case 3:16-cv-00054-JAM Document 50 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SUPREME FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL KENNEDY and FERRELL WELCH,
More informationETHICS IN EMINENT DOMAIN: THE NO CONTACT RULE VARIATIONS ON A THEME
ETHICS IN EMINENT DOMAIN: THE NO CONTACT RULE VARIATIONS ON A THEME ---------- Oregon Eminent Domain Conference Portland June 5, 2014 Mark J. Fucile Fucile & Reising LLP Portland Union Station 800 NW 6
More informationLegal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data
Legal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data Peter L. Ostermiller Attorney at Law 239 South Fifth Street Suite 1800 Louisville, KY 40202 peterlo@ploesq.com www.ploesq.com Overview What is Metadata?
More informationICDR/AAA EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Annex I Arbitration Rules
ICDR/AAA EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Annex I Arbitration Rules Effective as of September 15, 2017 THE EU-U.S. PRIVACY SHIELD ANNEX I BINDING ARBITRATION PROGRAM These Rules govern arbitrations that take place
More informationREGARDING: This letter concerns Grievance # (Alan Miles) and is my reply to your
Ms. Felice Congalton Associate Director WSBA Office of Disciplinary Counsel 1325 Fourth Ave #600 Seattle, WA 98101 April 11, 2012 Dear Ms Congalton: And to the WA STATE SUPREME COURT dismissal. REGARDING:
More informationETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM. Striving for Excellence
1 ETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM Striving for Excellence Objectives 2 Identify ethical issues in dependency practice for GAL attorneys and Attorneys
More informationKENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-430 Issued: January 16, 2010
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-430 Issued: January 16, 2010 The Rules of Professional Conduct are amended periodically. Lawyers should consult the current version of the rules and comments,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. ) Respondents and ) Cross-Appellants. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JOANNE ALDERSON and ROBERT ) ALDERSON, individually and as the ) marital community composed thereof, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Division Three ) R. CRANE
More informationCollege Policy SUBJECT: NUMBER: 6.4. Anti-Fraud and Theft Policy ORIGINAL DATE OF ISSUE: 12/16/09 REVISED: Purpose
College Policy SUBJECT: Anti-Fraud and Theft Policy NUMBER: ORIGINAL DATE OF ISSUE: REVISED: 6.4 12/16/09 Purpose Delaware County Community College is and wishes to be seen by all as being honest and opposed
More informationEthics Informational Packet REFERRAL FEES
Ethics Informational Packet REFERRAL FEES Courtesy of The Florida Bar Ethics Department TABLE OF CONTENTS Document Page # OPINION 17-1... 3 OPINION 90-8... 5 OPINION 90-3... 9 OPINION 89-1... 11 PROFESSIONAL
More informationYMCA NSW Whistle Blower Policy
1. Document control Overview A whistle-blower is any employee, volunteer, contractor or people associated with the YMCA NSW that detects wrongdoing, or has reasonable grounds for suspecting wrongdoing
More informationISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion Opinion No. 13-05 May 2013 Subject: Digest: Client Fraud; Court Obligations; Withdrawal from Representation When a lawyer discovers that his or her client in
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Formal Opinion 472 November 30, 2015 Communication with Person Receiving Limited-Scope Legal Services Under Model Rule
More informationISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion Opinion No. 12-17 July 2012 Subject: Digest: Advertising and Solicitation; Arbitration and Mediation; Multijurisdictional Practice; and Unauthorized Practice
More informationFrequently Asked Questions The Consumer Assistance Program
Frequently Asked Questions The Consumer Assistance Program What is the Consumer Assistance Program? The Mississippi Bar s Consumer Assistance Program (CAP) helps people with questions or problems with
More informationDavid J. Bright MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES
MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES David J. Bright Direct Number: (515) 286-7015 Facsimile: (515) 286-7050 E-Mail: djbright@nyemaster.com
More informationNAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1
NAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1 Question: The Ethics Counselors of the National Association for Public Defense (NAPD) have been asked to address the following scenario: An investigator working for Defense
More informationIndex of Subjects. Created by: Neil Savage, JD Legal Publications Editor/Indexer th Ave NE Seattle, WA
Created by: Neil Savage, JD Legal Publications Editor/Indexer 17812 28th Ave NE Seattle, WA 98155-4006 206-367-9312 Index of Subjects Advertising and solicitation Chat room advertising, 8.13(a) Generally,
More informationTHE NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS. FORMAL OPINION : Issuing a subpoena to a current client
THE NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS FORMAL OPINION 2017-6: Issuing a subpoena to a current client TOPIC: Conflict of interest when a party s lawyer in a civil lawsuit may
More informationJOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP) MANUAL OF PROCEDURES. December 2006
JOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP) MANUAL OF PROCEDURES December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: ETHICS ENFORCEMENT... 1 JOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP)... 2 THIS MANUAL... 3 DEFINITIONS...
More informationIN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES. B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012
IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012 Objective The goal of the company is to take maximum advantage of the attorneyclient privilege and related
More informationATTORNEY-CLIENT MAY 25, 2011 JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ.
THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE MAY 25, 2011 MCLE JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE PURPOSE FOR THE PRIVILEGE 3 II. WHAT IS PROTECTED 3 III. WAIVER OF THE PRIVILEGE 3 IV. WHEN A CORPORATION
More informationPEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure
PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure Presented by Tony M. Sain, Esq. tms@manningllp.com MANNING & KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP Five Questions Five
More informationBest Practices For NC In House Counsel To Avoid Being Deposed
womblebonddickinson.com Best Practices For NC In House Counsel To Avoid Being Deposed Presentation to the Charlotte Chapter of the ACC November 1, 2017 Attorney Work Product United Phosphorus, Ltd.
More informationEthics: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Doctrine, and Employment Investigations. October 5, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Ethics: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Doctrine, and Employment Investigations October 5, 2017 2017 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ETHICS: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, THE WORK-PRODUCT DOCTRINE,
More informationPENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FORMAL OPINION
PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FORMAL OPINION 2010-200 ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS ON MAINTAINING A VIRTUAL OFFICE FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN PENNSYLVANIA
More informationPENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION
PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is the charge of the PBA Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Committee to review and
More informationAssociation of Women Attorneys of Lake County
Association of Women Attorneys of Lake County Seminar, January 12, 2018-10:30-11:30 a.m. Responsibilities to the Profession and Client Raymond J. McKoski Presentation Materials ABA MODEL RULE OF PROFESSIONAL
More informationETHICS TOOLKIT FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL MANAGING LITIGATION APRIL 3, 2014
ETHICS TOOLKIT FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL MANAGING LITIGATION APRIL 3, 2014 Kenneth L. Racowski Chair, Philadelphia Commercial Litigation Wilson Elser LLP Daniel E. McGuire Commercial & Employment Litigation
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY 1.0 PREFACE UEM Group is committed to the highest standards of professionalism, honesty, integrity and ethical behaviour in the conduct of its business and operations. With this in
More informationComponents of an Effective Ethical Screen
Components of an Effective Ethical Screen By Anthony Davis and Michael Downey 1 The lawyer ethics rules in the various states generally specify at least some circumstances when a law firm may erect an
More informationETHICS AND APPELLATE PRACTICE
ETHICS AND APPELLATE PRACTICE Presented by Paul M. Rashkind Supervisory Assistant Federal Public Defender Chief, Appellate Division, Southern District of Florida I. Ethics of Initiating a Criminal Appeal
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: accwebcast@commpartners.com Thank You! Pitfalls and Potholes
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2018 Washington
Accountability Report Card Summary 2018 Washington Washington has an uneven state whistleblower law: Scoring 64 out of a possible 100; Ranking 15 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationCHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE TITLE34 ATTORNEYS AND LAYS ADVOCATE CODE.
CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE TITLE34 ATTORNEYS AND LAYS ADVOCATE CODE. ATTORNEYSANDLAYADVOCATE Rule 1.1 Qualifications for admissions as Attorney or Lay Advocate A. Attorneys- No person may practice as an attorney
More informationRule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law
Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law [ABA Version] (a) A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in
More informationlegal ethics opinions
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1783 IN CONTEXT OF (A) FORECLOSURE SALE OR (B) A COMMERCIAL CLOSING, MAY ATTORNEY DISBURSE TO LENDER COLLECTED ATTORNEYS FEES IN EXCESS OF THOSE NECESSARY TO REIMBURSE LENDER FOR PAYMENT
More informationTHE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT Provision PART 1 PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS Purpose of this Act 1 The purpose of this Act is (a) to facilitate the disclosure and investigation
More information4/20/2016 ETHICS. Jasmin Mize & Ken Troccoli, AFPDs (Alex.) W E S T
ETHICS Jasmin Mize & Ken Troccoli, AFPDs (Alex.) W E S T 2 1 PROFESSIONALISM COURSE QUESTION 1-W (1 POINT) According to the VA Bar, the loss of public esteem for the legal profession stems, in large part,
More informationDISCIPLINARY CASE STATISTICS /31/2018. Court Action on Board Recommended Sanction
DISCIPLINARY CASE STATISTICS 2015-2017 Supreme Court Decisions (excluding defaults and reinstatements) 51 68 41 Sanctions Imposed Public reprimand 19 10 5 (excluding defaults) Term suspension 25 44 24
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Washington
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Washington Washington has an uneven state whistleblower law: Scoring 62 out of a possible 100; Ranking 15 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationDue Diligence: The Sentencing Guidelines and the Lawyer s Role in Corporate Compliance and Ethics Programs. by Steven Carr
Due Diligence: The Sentencing Guidelines and the Lawyer s Role in Corporate Compliance and Ethics Programs by Steven Carr North Carolina Bar Foundation Continuing Legal Education December 9, 2005 Due Diligence:
More informationMs. Felice Congalton Associate Director WSBA Office of Disciplinary Counsel 1325 Fourth Ave #600 Seattle, WA April 9, Dear Ms Congalton:
Ms. Felice Congalton Associate Director WSBA Office of Disciplinary Counsel 1325 Fourth Ave #600 Seattle, WA 98101 April 9, 2012 Dear Ms Congalton: REGARDING: This letter concerns Grievance #12-00493 (Jeffrey
More informationIMPACT OF THE NEW OHIO RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ON SOLO/SMALL FIRMS
IMPACT OF THE NEW OHIO RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ON SOLO/SMALL FIRMS Panel Discussion by Charles J. Kettlewell, J.D. Christensen, Christensen, Donchatz, Kettlewell & Owens, LLP Alvin E. Mathews. J.D.
More informationReport of the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee
Ohio State Bar Association Council of Delegates November 2005 Meeting 19 Report of the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee To the Council of Delegates: The OSBA Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee
More information