SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF BAR ADMISSIONS

Similar documents
Corrected f. EY. Rule la:l. Admission to Practice in This Commonwealth Without Examination.

Effective January 1, 2016

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE SENT IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR IT TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE:

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-430 Issued: January 16, 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,928. In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

UNRAVELING THE MYSTERY OF THE CHARACTER AND FITNESS PROCESS

REINSTATEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE. To facilitate the processing of Petitions for Reinstatement to practice law the

TOWN OF COLUMBINE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION AS A CANADIAN LEGAL ADVISOR

PETITION AND QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ADMISSION TO THE NEW HAMPSHIRE BAR

Signed June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

SUPREME COURT RULES FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE BAR OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

SRA Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas. Texas State Bar Ethics Rules HIGHLIGHTS (SELECTED EXCERPTS)

SAN FRANCISCO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AGENCY CERTIFICATE/LICENSE DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR PREHOSPITAL PERSONNEL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. concerning the Board s consideration of the Final Report of the Character. Background

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos ,011(17B) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE

APPENDIX A Affidavit in Support of Application to Resign While Proceeding or Investigation is Pending INSTRUCTIONS An application pursuant to section

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

Directive. Staff Manual - Staff Rules Office of Ethics and Business (EBC) Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public

Guide to sanctioning

THE ALLEN POLICE DEPARTMENT - HIRING PROCESS

Introduction and background

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Zapor, 127 Ohio St.3d 372, 2010-Ohio-5769.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

CITY OF LAREDO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

S14Y0692. IN THE MATTER OF LAXAVIER P. REDDICK-HOOD. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE

Application for Employment

The Bar Training Regulations ANNEX A

THE ALLEN POLICE DEPARTMENT - HIRING PROCESS

Texas Administrative Code

BEFORE THE SEVENTH DISTRICT COMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

Employment Application

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) [TFB Nos ,980(07B); v ,684(07B)]

The District Volunteer Coordinator shall notify any volunteer who is not approved for volunteer service based on their criminal history record.

LAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS

LORAIN METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY. APPLICANT SCREENING PROCESS Revised July 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,097. In the Matter of TIMOTHY CLARK MEYER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

Application for Employment

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OPINION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,542. In the Matter of BENJAMIN N. CASAD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

ALABAMA PRIVATE INVESTIGATION BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 741-X-6 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Specialty Certification Standards for Business, Commercial and Industrial Real Property Law

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Case No. SC [TFB No ,112(18B)(CRE)]

Policies of the University of North Texas Health Science Center Criminal History Background Checks For Security Sensitive Positions

Most Common Firearms Law Questions

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

People v. Bill Condon. 16PDJ050. December 23, 2016.

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION

APPLICATION CHECKLIST IMPORTANT Submit all items on the checklist below with your application to ensure faster processing.

Rule Change #2000(20)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. The following attorneys appeared as counsel for the parties:

World Bank Group Directive

ENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT

Docket No. 29,313 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 2006-NMSC-012, 139 N.M. 266, 131 P.3d 653 March 28, 2006, Filed

10 A BILL to amend and reenact , , , , , , , , ,

Board of Certification, Inc. Version Effective September 1, 2016 Updated May 2016

C-1 No. Revised 12/15 TO THE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA: 5510 Six Forks Road Suite 300 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609

Residential Real Property Law

VOLUSIA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 2018 Judicial Election Questionnaire. 6. Military Service (including Reserves) Service Branch Highest Rank Dates

Supreme Court of Florida

Academy District 20 Non-Parent Volunteer Application Form. Process Information for Principals

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. December 10, Thereafter, the Chief Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit

Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators. Part I. Mediator Qualifications

STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES

THE ADOPTION OF THE ABA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS BY THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT - IN RE BUCK4LEW

UNIFORM JUDICIAL QUESTIONNAIRE

APPENDIX E ARC DISCIPLINARY POLICY

People v. Crews, 05PDJ049. March 6, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Respondent

THERE IS AN ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF MEDICAL DETAILS.

Elon University School of Law Honor Code Preamble

Selected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann

Oregon State Bar Minimum Continuing Legal Education Rules and Regulations (As amended effective June 1, 2014)

STATE OF UTAH DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING APPLICATION FOR LICENSURE ATHLETE AGENT DOPL-AP-104 REV 03/13/2003

Supreme Court of Florida

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE PROCEDURES MANUAL

EXPLORING RECENT CHANGES TO ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT:

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the. This matter was before us on a certification of default filed

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 15.b of the Statute of the Council of Europe,

Jason D. Saunders appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the

West Virginia University Research Integrity Procedure Approved by the Faculty Senate May 9, 2011

Employment Application

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA

Selected Model Rules of Professional Conduct Ellen C. Yaroshefsky

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1

EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED OR THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU!

IAN DAVID HAY Respondent

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

SEALING OF CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDS (General Information) July 1, 2017

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF BAR ADMISSIONS POLICY STATEMENT OF THE BOARD TO DETERMINE FITNESS OF BAR APPLICANTS REGARDING CHARACTER AND FITNESS REVIEWS The Supreme Court of Georgia has delegated to the Board to Determine Fitness of Bar Applicants the responsibility of deciding whether applicants for admission to the practice of law possess the integrity and character requisite to be members of the Bar of Georgia. The public interest requires that the public be secure in its expectation that those who are admitted to the Bar are worthy of the trust and confidence clients may reasonably place in their attorneys. In order to be certified for fitness, the Board requires that an applicant to the bar be one whose record of conduct justifies the trust of clients, adversaries, courts and others. The hallmark of such a person is honesty, especially in connection with the application for admission to the bar. A person with a record showing a deficiency in honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, reliability, or judgment might not be recommended by the Fitness Board to the Supreme Court for admission. The burden is on the applicant to establish and document his or her current good character and fitness for admission. If the Board determines that the applicant=s current character and fitness are deficient in honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, reliability, or judgment, the applicant will not be recommended for admission. The Board views character and fitness as including, but not limited to, the following elements: - The ability to conduct oneself with a high degree of honesty, integrity, and trustworthiness in all professional relationships and with respect to all legal obligations. - The ability to use honesty and good judgment in financial dealings on behalf of oneself, clients, and others. - The ability to conduct oneself with respect for and in accordance with the law and the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, (Part IV of the Rules and Regulations for the Organization and Government of the State Bar of Georgia), and A Lawyer=s Creed, and the Aspirational Statement on Professionalism (Part IX). - The ability to exercise good judgment in conducting one=s professional business. - The ability to avoid acts that exhibit disregard for the health, safety and welfare of others. - The ability to conduct oneself diligently and reliably in fulfilling all obligations to clients, attorneys, courts, and others. - The ability to comply with deadlines and time constraints. - The ability to conduct oneself professionally and in a manner that engenders respect for the law and the legal profession. The Board will conduct a thorough investigation of each applicant, using as a basis for the investigation the Fitness Application submitted to the Office of Bar Admissions by the applicant. There is conduct that the Board may consider the basis for further inquiry. This conduct includes, but is not limited to: 1 Revised May 7, 2015

- unlawful conduct - academic misconduct, including plagiarism - making of a false statement, including omission of relevant facts in the fitness process - misconduct in employment - acts involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation - abuse of legal process - neglect of financial responsibilities, especially failure to repay student loans - neglect of professional obligations - violation of an order of a court, especially failure to pay child support - evidence of mental or emotional instability - evidence of drug or alcohol dependency - denial of admission to the Bar in another jurisdiction on character and fitness grounds - disciplinary action by a lawyer disciplinary agency or other professional disciplinary agency of any jurisdiction The Fitness Application that each applicant completes inquires about each of the above. The applicant may be asked to provide facts, explanation, and documentation, in addition to answers to the questions on the Fitness Application. All required documentation must be current and valid. The Board believes that the questions on the application are clear and direct; but should an applicant ever have a question about whether a question is applicable, the Board's recommendation is that the applicant disclose the information sought. In order to verify the accuracy of the information provided in the application, or to obtain additional information, the Board will contact the applicant's references, employers, colleges and law schools. The Board will contact courts, medical providers, police agencies, credit agencies and creditors as applicable. A failure by the applicant to cooperate in this process could cause a delay or even denial of the applicant's Certification of Fitness. The Board has developed policies and procedures for many of the above-cited examples of questionable conduct. These include but are not limited to: A. Unlawful Conduct: If an applicant has been convicted of a felony, the Board expects the applicant to seek a pardon before seeking admission. The Board considers restoration of civil rights to be critical to an applicant's ability to function fully as an attorney, so restoration of civil rights at a minimum is required. If an applicant is unable to obtain a pardon, however, documentation should be provided as to the efforts that have been made and the status of the petition. The Board will inquire into all arrests even if no conviction resulted. There are many reasons why arrests do not result in convictions, and many of them have no bearing on guilt or innocence. The Board is required to inquire into all areas of possibly relevant applicant misconduct. The applicant is required to report all incidents and to provide evidence of rehabilitation and evidence of current good character. The occurrence of an acquittal or dismissal is relevant, but is not dispositive of the issue. This is not to suggest that the Board will assume that any arrest was due to guilty conduct on the part of the applicant. The applicant's obligation is to be completely forthright regarding all matters about which the Board inquires. 2 Revised May 7, 2015

If, at the time of the application, criminal charges are pending against the applicant, the Board will table the application until these charges are resolved. If a conviction results in probation, restitution or some other sentence, the Board will not consider the application until the sentence has been served and probation completed. The Board will then proceed to investigate the facts and circumstances that led to the criminal charges. The Board will adhere to the court=s original sentence in calculating the eligibility date for Certification of Fitness to Practice Law, regardless of any earlier termination or completion of probation. B. Academic Misconduct: The Fitness Board strongly believes that academic misconduct, notably plagiarism, is indicative of dishonesty and untrustworthiness and predictive of dishonesty and untrustworthiness in the practice of law. Academic misconduct in law school is of particular concern to the Fitness Board. If an applicant has received a sanction or been disciplined for a charge of plagiarism or any other academic misconduct in law school, the applicant might not be recommended by the Fitness Board to the Supreme Court for admission. C. Making a False Statement: A pattern of dishonesty in dealings with employers, schools and authorities, including the Office of Bar Admissions, is the most frequent reason for denial of Bar applicants. Giving false information on the application or failing to be entirely forthcoming and completely candid in the application process is a serious error which will have negative consequences for an applicant. The failure to be fully responsive to application questions, or any other lack of candor in the application process, involves sworn statements made to an agency of the Supreme Court itself; since such dishonesty is both current and ongoing, the applicant to whom it might be charged will have a difficult time showing that rehabilitation--which requires more than contrition--has occurred and will be sustained. D. Neglect of Financial Responsibilities: The Fitness Board recognizes that law students sometimes have financial problems associated with the expense of law school, or with ongoing family obligations. The Board also recognizes that mishandling of client funds is a frequent and serious cause for professional discipline. Admission to the Bar does not require a perfect credit record. The Board is interested in whether applicants have dealt honestly and responsibly with their creditors, and whether they are doing so at the time of application. Responsible dealings generally include but are not limited to keeping in contact with the creditor, making payment arrangements, and meeting the terms of those arrangements. If the applicant currently has an unsatisfactory credit record, especially unpaid collections, judgments, liens, or charged off accounts, the Board will table the application until the applicant has provided proof of six current consecutive months of payments in the monthly amount as agreed to by the creditor so that the applicant can show a good faith effort to clear the debts. The deadline for the submission of the required documentation is May 15 for applicants for the July Bar examination and December 15 for applicants for the February examination. These deadlines set by the Board are firm and will not be extended. 3 Revised May 7, 2015

Defaulted student loans and failure to make child support payments are of particular concern to the Board. If an applicant has defaulted student loans, the Board will table the application until the applicant has made arrangements with the lender(s) for repayment of the loan(s) and has provided proof of six current consecutive months of payments in the monthly amount pursuant to the plan agreed to by the lender(s). Any arrearage in child support must be paid before an applicant will be certified by the Board. The six-month payment arrangement should demonstrate a good faith attempt and a reasonable effort to clear the "charged off" accounts, collection accounts, defaults, liens and judgments entered against an applicant. Bankruptcy is a legal process that an applicant may choose to pursue if it is in the applicant=s financial interest to do so. The Board will review carefully, however, whether the filing of the bankruptcy was done solely to avoid Board oversight or to avoid the six month policy. The Board will review carefully the applicant=s assumption of financial responsibility, but the filing of the bankruptcy will not in and of itself lead automatically to a denial. However, during the pendency of the bankruptcy proceeding, the applicant may not be eligible for Certification of Fitness because the policy on Neglect of Financial Responsibilities has not been met. To meet the policy, an applicant who has filed a bankruptcy petition must provide a statement as to why he or she found it necessary to file, as well as a copy of the petition and a list of creditors. For Chapter 7, the applicant must provide a copy of the Discharge of Debtor. For Chapter 13, the applicant must provide the current Trustee=s Report and demonstrable proof of six current payments to the trustee. If, after the applicant=s discharge in bankruptcy, his or her credit report shows unpaid collections, judgments, liens, or charged off accounts, the applicant must provide proof of six current consecutive months of payments in the monthly amount as agreed to by the creditor. E. Evidence of Mental or Emotional Instability: Evidence of mental or emotional instability, like evidence of chemical dependency, is one of the factors about which the Fitness Board must inquire. Board members recognize that the stresses of law school, as well as other life factors, frequently result in seeking psychiatric or psychological counseling. The Board encourages any applicant to obtain such counseling or treatment if potential benefits might accrue. The applicant should not allow his or her future Bar application to color that decision. Only severe forms of mental or emotional problems will trigger an in-depth investigation or have an impact on Bar admission decisions. Isolated instances of consultation for conditions associated with emotional stress will not be of serious concern to the Board. F. Drug or Alcohol Dependency and Mental or Emotional Instability: Evidence of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse and evidence of mental or emotional instability are relevant conduct factors about which the Board must inquire. Accordingly, the applicant should be prepared to provide treatment records, as well as other records of incidents which were associated with any abuse or addictive behavior or mental or emotional instability. If the applicant has a problem with drugs or alcohol or mental health issues, he or she is strongly encouraged to get the counseling or treatment needed as soon as possible. The applicant's recognition of the problem and the treatment record will be important evidence 4 Revised May 7, 2015

of rehabilitation, regardless of the seriousness of any misconduct which may have arisen from the chemical dependency or mental health issues. The Board has the option of asking applicants to obtain a drug, alcohol, or mental health evaluation from a Board-certified psychiatrist or licensed psychologist of Ph.D. level recommended by the Board. G. Non-U.S. Citizen Applicants: All applicants are required to document their citizenship status. Each year, the Board issues Certifications of Fitness to non-u.s. citizen applicants who have documented that they maintain legal status in the United States. A non-u.s. citizen applicant is required to provide documentation demonstrating that he or she maintains legal status in the United States and will remain in legal status through the character and fitness process. Pursuant to Part A, Section 12 of the Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law, all Certifications of Fitness are tentative until an applicant is actually admitted to the practice of law. Therefore, a non-u.s. citizen must provide documentation that he or she will remain in legal status until the Certificate for Eligibility for Admission to the Practice of Law is issued. Weight and Significance of Conduct In reviewing any conduct of concern, the Board will use several factors in assigning weight and significance to that conduct. Among those factors are: - the evidence of rehabilitation - the applicant's age at the time of the conduct - the recency of the conduct - the reliability of the information concerning the conduct - the seriousness of the conduct - the factors underlying the conduct - the cumulative effect of the conduct - the applicant's positive social contributions since the conduct - the applicant's candor in the admissions process - the materiality of any omissions or misrepresentations Rehabilitation Evidence of rehabilitation is the most critical factor the Board uses to determine whether past problems should lead to denial of admission. The Board's standard for admission is current good character and fitness. Any applicant who affirmatively asserts rehabilitation from prior conduct which bears adversely upon such person=s character and fitness for admission to the Bar shall be required to produce evidence of such rehabilitation including, but not limited to, the following elements: - strict compliance with the specific conditions of any disciplinary, judicial, administrative or other order, where applicable - the taking of responsibility for the conduct - appreciation for and insight into why the conduct raises fitness concerns - candor and credibility before the Board - impeccable character and moral standing in the community 5 Revised May 7, 2015

- good reputation for professional ability, where applicable - lack of malice and ill feeling toward those who by duty were compelled to bring about the disciplinary, judicial, administrative or other proceeding, where applicable - personal assurances, supported by corroborating evidence, of a desire and intention to conduct one=s self in an exemplary fashion in the future - restitution of funds or property, where applicable - positive action showing rehabilitation by such things as a person=s occupation, religion, or community or civic service Merely showing that an individual is now living as and doing those things he or she should have done throughout life, although necessary to prove rehabilitation, does not prove that the individual has undertaken a useful and constructive place in society. The requirement of a positive action is appropriate for applicants for admission to the Bar because service to one=s community is an implied obligation to members of the Bar. In Re: Cason, 249 Ga 806 (1982) provides guidance on the issue of rehabilitation. The applicant bears the burden of demonstrating evidence to alleviate the Board=s concerns, based on his or her past conduct, about the applicant=s future conduct. Should there be any questions about the application or the Board's policies, please contact: Office of Bar Admissions 244 Washington Street SW, Suite 440 Atlanta, GA 30334 404-656-3490 6 Revised May 7, 2015

POLICY STATEMENT OF THE BOARD TO DETERMINE FITNESS OF BAR APPLICANTS REGARDING DUI AND OTHER ALCOHOL-RELATED OFFENSES (Adopted March 12, 2007, revised September 11, 2008; May 12, 2011) Any applicant who received a Driving Under the Influence (DUI) conviction or the equivalent in any jurisdiction is ineligible for Certification of Fitness to Practice Law for a period of twelve months from the date of conviction, as if the applicant had been sentenced under the mandatory twelvemonth sentence required by the Georgia DUI statute (Ga. Code Ann. Section ' 40-6-391), whether or not the sentence was probated. The Board will adhere to the court=s original sentence in calculating the eligibility date for Certification of Fitness to Practice Law, regardless of any earlier termination or completion of probation. In the case of an applicant who was charged with DUI in Georgia (or its equivalent in any jurisdiction) but for whom the charge was reduced, resulting in a sentence for reckless driving, failure to maintain proper lane, and/or lesser offense(s), the Board is concerned about disregard for the law as well as possible patterns or problems related to abuse of alcohol and/or other substances and of the impact of these problems on the applicant=s fitness to practice law. Therefore, any applicant who receives a conviction for an offense reduced from an original charge of DUI, regardless of the terms of probation, is ineligible for fitness certification for the period extending from the date of conviction to the completion of the sentence, including any probation, or for a period of twelve months from the conviction, whichever is longer. Following the expiration of the period during which the applicant is ineligible for certification, the applicant may be eligible to take the succeeding examination or for the release of grades from a previous examination. Such eligibility will be decided by the Board on a case-by-case basis following its standard policies. It should be understood that this is a procedural bar only. Following the expiration of the period during which the applicant is ineligible for certification, the Board will review the applicant=s file on the merits for a determination of whether to certify the applicant for fitness. The Board may have substantive concerns about the applicant=s conduct that may lead the Board to make further investigation, to require that the applicant be evaluated for drug or alcohol dependency, and/or to require that the applicant appear before the Board for an informal conference, prior to the Board=s acting upon certification of the applicant.

POLICY STATEMENT OF THE BOARD TO DETERMINE FITNESS OF BAR APPLICANTS REGARDING TIME LIMITATIONS ON HOLDING GRADES PENDING FINAL CERTIFICATION AND GUIDELINE FOR DETERMINATION OF ABANDONMENT OF FITNESS APPLICATION (Adopted March 12, 2007) Time Limitation on Holding Grades Pending Final Certification In the case of an applicant whose grades are being held because the Bar Examination was taken under temporary certification of fitness, or under final certification that was subsequently revoked, the applicant will have three (3) years from the date of the general release of grades (for the examination taken by the applicant ) to obtain final certification. Six (6) months prior to the expiration of the three years, the staff shall give written notice to the applicant that if final fitness certification has not been obtained within the following six months, the applicant=s file will be considered abandoned. Guideline for Determination of Abandonment of Fitness Application In the case of an applicant who has made no written response to a written request by the Office of Bar Admissions for three (3) years from the date of the written request, the Assistant Director has the authority to determine that the file has been abandoned and will so inform the applicant in writing at his or her last known address. Questionable cases will be brought before the Board for consideration.