IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
|
|
- Kathlyn Williams
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Complainant, Case No. SC07-40 [TFB Case Nos ,345(20B); ,662(20B); ,965(20B)] KENT ALAN JOHANSON, Respondent. / AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE I. Summary of Proceedings: The undersigned was appointed as referee to conduct disciplinary proceedings herein according to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. The Pleadings, Notices, Motions, Orders, Transcripts and Exhibits, all of which are forwarded to The Supreme Court of Florida with this report, constitute the record in this case. On June 5, 2007, this referee filed a Report of Referee and the record with the Court. On June 12, 2007, the bar filed a Motion to Return Case to Referee for Entry of an Amended Report of Referee to Correct Scrivener s Error with respondent s consent. By order dated June 19, 2007, this Court granted the bar s motion, allowing this referee until and including July 19, 2007 to file an amended report of referee. The following attorneys appeared as counsel for the parties: For The Florida Bar - Kenneth H. P. Bryk For The Respondent - pro se II. Findings of Fact as to Each Item of Misconduct of Which the Respondent Is Charged: After considering all the pleadings and evidence, pertinent portions of which
2 are commented on below, this referee finds: 1. On March 1, 2007, this referee entered an order granting the bar s Motion for Default based upon respondent s failure to file an Answer to the Complaint or to participate in these proceedings as of that date. COUNT I [TFB Case No ,345(20B)] 2. Respondent represented Swiss Sausage House, Inc. in an action brought by a salaried employee seeking compensation for overtime work. 3. In or around October 2003, after obtaining a judgment in favor of Swiss Sausage House, Inc., André Herrmann, the corporate representative, directed respondent to file a motion to recover the corporation s attorney s fees from the losing claimant in the amount of $15, Thereafter, respondent failed to maintain adequate communication with either Mr. Herrmann or Louisa Mullin Herrmann, the other corporate representative. 5. On the few occasions when respondent communicated with the Herrmanns, he repeatedly told them that the motion for attorney s fees was filed and proceeding. These statements were untrue. 6. Respondent failed to file a motion for attorney s fees on behalf of Swiss Sausage House, Inc. 7. Respondent never advised Mr. Herrmann that he was unable to represent the corporation in the motion for attorney s fees. 8. In or about January 2004, Swiss Sausage House, Inc. hired respondent to pursue a claim against an insurance company for damages suffered after the company s truck was destroyed in an accident. 9. Respondent failed to handle the claim in a diligent manner and failed to maintain adequate communications with the Herrmanns. 10. In or around late 2004, Mr. Herrmann directed his corporate attorney to recover the two files from respondent so that Swiss Sausage House, Inc. could hire new counsel to pursue the cases. 11. Despite repeated assurances that the files and original documents would be provided to new counsel, respondent failed to do so. 12. On April 22, 2005, the Bar served respondent at his record bar address with the grievance against him involving Swiss Sausage House, Inc. and directed respondent to provide a written response to Ms. Herrmann and the Bar within 15 days. 2
3 13. Respondent failed to respond to the Bar s investigative inquiry. 14. On May 13, 2005, the Bar served respondent at his record bar address, by certified mail, return receipt requested, with the grievance against him involving Swiss Sausage House, Inc. and directed respondent to provide a written response to Ms. Herrmann and the Bar within 7 days. 15. Respondent signed the return receipt card on May 16, Respondent failed to respond to the Bar s investigative inquiry. COUNT II [TFB Case No ,662(20B)] 17. In or around 2000, David and Karen Tutch hired respondent to represent them in a claim for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident that occurred on February 9, 2000 in Marathon, Florida. The Tutchs resided in Minnesota for part of the year and balance of the year in Florida. 18. Respondent advised the Tutchs that although he did not normally handle personal injury claims that he would represent them. Respondent advised the Tutchs that if he determined that he could not provide them with adequate representation, he would refer their case to another attorney. 19. Thereafter, respondent failed to keep scheduled appointments with the Tutchs and failed to maintain adequate communication with them. 20. On the occasions when respondent communicated with the Tutchs, he repeatedly advised them the case was progressing. This statement was untrue. 21. Despite Mr. Tutch s directive on or about June 26, 2001 to proceed immediately, respondent failed to file the complaint until July 31, Respondent failed to convey a settlement offer to the Tutchs that he received from the insurer on or about March 26, 2003 until on or about April 26, 2003 after Mr. Tutch made three telephone calls to respondent requesting the status of the case. 23. Mr. Tutch rejected the settlement offer and directed respondent to aggressively pursue the personal injury claim. 24. After the defendants filed the answer and affirmative defenses on August 22, 2003, respondent failed to file a reply to the affirmative defenses until October 2, Opposing counsel mounted an aggressive defense to the personal injury claim, challenging the seriousness of the Tutchs injuries and the validity of their claim. 26. Opposing counsel propounded numerous discovery requests to the Tutchs during the litigation. 3
4 27. On at least six occasions, respondent failed to file timely responses to the discovery demands, resulting in opposing counsel filing at least eight motions to compel, three motions for sanctions, two motions for attorney s fees and three motions to dismiss. 28. The court issued numerous orders to the Tutchs to compel discovery. 29. On or about July 7, 2005, defense counsel attempted to serve respondent by mail with a proposal for settlement. 30. After respondent failed to claim the letter, the settlement proposal was returned to opposing counsel. 31. Respondent did not convey the settlement offer to the Tutchs. 32. Respondent never advised the Tutchs of the ramifications of declining an offer of settlement in the event they were awarded damages in an amount similar to or less than that made in an offer of settlement. 33. On July 8, 2005, defense counsel served additional discovery upon respondent. 34. Respondent failed to file a response, resulting in defense counsel filing a motion to compel discovery on August 23, Respondent misled the Tutchs into believing mediation had been scheduled in their case when in fact it had not. 36. Respondent never advised the Tutchs that he did not believe that they had a valid claim or that they should hire new counsel due to respondent s inexperience. 37. On October 11, 2005, Mr. Tutch wrote respondent and advised him he was terminating respondent s services due to respondent s failure to communicate and neglect of the case. 38. Mr. Tutch requested that respondent forward the file and travel reimbursements to him. 39. Mr. Tutch also disputed respondent s bill for expenses allegedly incurred for long distance telephone calls and faxes. Mr. Tutch advised respondent that neither he nor his wife had received any long distance telephone calls or faxes from respondent during the period set forth in the bill. 40. Respondent failed to forward the file, original documents or travel reimbursement to the Tutchs. 41. On March 28, 2005, respondent was administratively suspended from the practice of law because of his failure to comply with continuing legal education requirements. 42. Despite his administrative suspension, respondent continued to provide legal services to the Tutchs, such as holding himself out as being licensed to practice law and remaining as attorney of record. 43. On December 9, 2005, the Bar served respondent at his record bar address 4
5 with the grievance against him involving the Tutch s and directed respondent to provide a written response to Mr. Tutch and the Bar within 15 days. 44. Respondent failed to respond to the Bar s investigative inquiry. COUNT III [TFB Case No ,965(20B)] 45. In or around April 2005, Michael Skladany, a resident of Arizona, hired respondent to represent him in a wage garnishment action against Ritchie and Christie Wilson and paid respondent a legal fee. 46. When respondent was hired by Mr. Skladany, respondent was administratively suspended from the practice of law due to his failure to comply with his continuing legal education requirements. 47. Respondent did not advise Ms. Skladany that he was not a member in good standing eligible to engage in the practice of law. 48. In or around June 2005, respondent requested $ for court costs from Mr. Skladany. On June 12, 2005, Mr. Skladany sent $ to respondent. 49. Thereafter, respondent failed to communicate with Mr. Skladany or provide him with any meaningful legal services. 50. Respondent did not refund any of the unearned legal fee nor did he return or provide an accounting of the costs paid. 51. On February 15, 2006, the Bar served respondent at his record bar address with the grievance against him involving Mr. Skladany and directed respondent to provide a written response to Mr. Skladany and the Bar within 15 days. 52. Respondent failed to respond to the Bar s investigative inquiry. 53. On March 10, 2006, the Bar served respondent at his record bar address, by certified mail, return receipt requested, with the grievance against him involving Mr. Skladany and directed respondent to provide a written response to Mr. Skladany and the Bar within 10 days. 54. Respondent signed the return receipt card on March 14, Respondent failed to respond to the Bar s investigative inquiry. III. Recommendations as to Whether the Respondent Should Be Found Guilty: As to each count of the complaint, this referee makes the following recommendations as to guilt or innocence: Pursuant to the Order of Default, I recommend respondent be found guilty and specifically that he be found guilty of violating the following Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: 5
6 COUNT I [TFB Case No ,345(20B)] for failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; for failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter, for failing to comply with reasonable requests for information, and for failing to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation; (d) for failing to take the steps reasonably practicable to protect a client s interests upon the termination of the representation; for failing to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client; and, 4-8.4(g) for failing to respond, in writing, to an official inquiry by Bar counsel or a disciplinary agency when Bar counsel or the agency is conducting an investigation into the lawyer s conduct. COUNT II [TFB Case No ,662(20B)] for failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; for failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter, for failing to comply with reasonable requests for information, and for failing to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation; 4-8.4(c) for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; and 4-8.4(g) for failing to respond, in writing, to an official inquiry by Bar counsel or a disciplinary agency when Bar counsel or the agency is conducting an investigation into the lawyer s conduct. COUNT III [TFB Case No ,965(20B)] for failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; for failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter, for failing to comply with reasonable requests for information, and for failing to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation; 4-8.4(c) for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation and 4-8.4(g) for failing to respond, in writing, to an official inquiry by Bar counsel or a disciplinary agency when Bar counsel or the agency is conducting an investigation into the lawyer s conduct. 6
7 IV. Rule Violations Found: COUNT I [TFB Case No ,345(20B)] ; 4-1.4; (d); 4-3.2; and 4-8.4(g). COUNT II [TFB Case No ,662(20B)] ; 4-1.4; 4-8.4(c); and 4-8.4(g). COUNT III [TFB Case No ,965(20B)] ; 4-1.; 4-8.4(c); and 4-8.4(g). V. Recommendation as to Disciplinary Measures to Be Applied: On May 18, 2007, this referee conducted a telephonic final hearing as to discipline only that was attended by respondent and counsel for the bar. Following this telephonic final hearing, where both parties were afforded an opportunity to offer proof and make recommendations, this referee makes the following recommendations as to the disciplinary measures to be applied: A. One year rehabilitative suspension; and B. Payment of costs which currently total $ 1, VI. Personal History and Past Disciplinary Record: After the finding of guilty and prior to recommending discipline to be recommended pursuant to R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.6(m)(1)(D), this referee considered the following personal history, prior disciplinary record of the respondent, case law and standards, to wit: Age: 48 Date admitted to bar: May 8, 1992 Prior disciplinary convictions and disciplinary measures imposed therein: 1. The Florida Bar v. Johanson, 908 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 2005) Public reprimand for neglect, inadequate communication and failure to respond to the bar. (Exhibit A - Certificate of Disciplinary History). CASE LAW Additionally, I have considered the following case law: 1. The Florida Bar v. Grosso, 647 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 1994) 10 day suspension for failure to respond to the bar s investigative inquiries. In mitigation, Mr. Grosso had no prior disciplinary history. Prior to reinstatement, he was required to submit a certification 7
8 from a psychiatrist attesting to his ability to resume his law practice and to provide the bar with a complete response to the substantive charges underlying the proceedings. 2. The Florida Bar v. Heptner, 887 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 2004) Two year suspension for attorney misconduct. The Court noted that the Court considers the respondent s prior disciplinary history where appropriate for cumulative misconduct. Thus, the Court deals more harshly with cumulative misconduct than it does isolated misconduct. 3. The Florida Bar v. Broome, 932 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 2006) One year suspension for engaging in multiple acts of gross neglect resulting in client prejudice, failing to respond to the bar s investigative inquires, making misrepresentations to the bar concerning her efforts to resolve one client s grievance, failing to communicate with clients, and receiving fees that were excessive in light of the services provided. In mitigation, the attorney suffered from clinical depression, had no prior disciplinary history, there was no evidence of a dishonest or selfish motive, and had undergone interim rehabilitation. In aggravation, she engaged in a pattern of misconduct over a period of many years affecting a large number of clients. Her neglect caused potentially serious harm to at least one criminal client. 4. The Florida Bar v. Morrison, 660 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 1996) 1 year suspension for failing to act with reasonable diligence, inadequate client communications and failing to respond to the bar s investigative inquiries. The attorney had a prior public reprimand. 5. The Florida Bar v. Wheeler, 940 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 2006) - 2 year suspension for neglecting client legal matters resulting in prejudice to those clients, failing to maintain adequate communication with clients, taking excessive fees, engaging in trust account recordkeeping violations, commingling, misusing client funds, making misrepresentations to a court and failing to respond to the bar s investigative inquires. 6. The Florida Bar v. Floyd, 928 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 2006) 6 month suspension for neglecting client legal matters, failing to maintain adequate communication with clients and failing to respond to the bar s investigative inquires. STANDARDS In making this recommendation, I have considered the following Florida Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions: 4.4 Lack of Diligence 8
9 4.42 Suspension is appropriate when: (a) a lawyer knowingly fails to perform services for a client and causes injury or potential injury to a client, or (b) a lawyer engages in a pattern of neglect and causes injury or potential injury to a client. 4.6 Lack of Candor 4.62 Suspension is appropriate when a lawyer knowingly deceives a client, and causes injury or potential injury to a client. 7.0 Violations of Other Duties Owed as a Professional 7.2 Suspension is appropriate when a lawyer knowingly engages in conduct that is a violation of a duty owed as a professional and causes injury or potential injury to a client, the public, or the legal system. 8.0 Prior Discipline Orders 8.2 Suspension is appropriate when a lawyer has been publicly reprimanded for the same or similar conduct and engages in further similar acts of misconduct that cause injury or potential injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession Aggravating Factors (a) prior disciplinary offenses; (c) pattern of misconduct; (d) multiple offenses; (i) substantial experience in the practice of law; and (e) bad faith obstruction of the disciplinary proceeding by intentionally failing to comply with rules or orders of the disciplinary agency Mitigating Factors (c) personal or emotional problems. VII. Statement of costs and manner in which costs should be taxed: This referee finds the following costs were reasonably incurred by The Florida Bar. A. Grievance Committee Level Costs: 1. Court Reporter Costs $
10 B. Referee Level Costs: 1. Court Reporter Costs $ C. Administrative Costs $ 1, D. Miscellaneous Costs: 1. Copy Costs $ TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS: $ 1, It is apparent that other costs have or may be incurred. It is recommended that all such costs and expenses together with the foregoing itemized costs be charged to the respondent, and that interest at the statutory rate shall accrue and be payable beginning 30 days after the judgment in this case becomes final unless a waiver is granted by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar. It is further recommended that respondent shall be deemed delinquent and ineligible to practice law pursuant to R. Regulating Fla. Bar for failure to timely pay the costs assessed in this proceeding. Dated this day of, Edward Nicholas Referee Original to Supreme Court with Referee s original file. Copies of this Report of Referee only to: Kenneth H. P. Bryk, Bar Counsel, 1200 Edgewater Drive, Orlando, Florida
11 Kent Alan Johanson, Respondent, Johanson Law Office, 3541 Bonita Bay Boulevard, Suite 100, Bonita Springs, Florida Mr. Kenneth Lawrence Marvin, Staff Counsel, The Florida Bar, 651 East Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida H:\Cases\Johanson.ka\SC07-40\Pleadings\AmendedROR.doc 11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Case No. SC08-1747 [TFB Case Nos. 2008-30,285(09C); 2008-30,351(09C); 2008-30,387(09C); 2008-30,479(09C); 2008-30,887(09C)]
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE (As to Font Type Only)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Case No. SC10-718 [TFB Case No. 2010-31,202(05A)(OSC)] SUZANNE MARIE HIMES, Respondent. / AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE (As
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) [TFB Nos ,980(07B); v ,684(07B)]
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) Complainant, Case No. SC07-661 [TFB Nos. 2005-30,980(07B); v. 2006-30,684(07B)] CHARLES BEHM, Respondent. / REVISED REPORT OF REFEREE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, SAMUEL A. MALAT, Case No. SC07-2153 TFB File No. 2008-00,300(2A) Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) [TFB Case Nos ,723(18C); v ,444(18C); ,872(18C)] REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Case No. SC09-682 [TFB Case Nos. 2008-31,723(18C); v. 2009-30,444(18C); 2009-30,828(18C); TERRY M. FITZPATRICK WALCOTT,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. The following attorneys appeared as counsel for the parties:
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Complainant, Case No. SC07-663 TFB No. 2006-10,833 (6A) LAURIE L. PUCKETT, Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE I. Summary of Proceedings:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. December 10, Thereafter, the Chief Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. KURT S. HARMON, Respondent. / Supreme Court Case No. SC08-2310 The Florida Bar File Nos. 2008-50,741(17A) 2008-51,596(17A)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, CASE NO. SC10-1174 TFB NO. 2008-11,083 (6B) MICHAEL ALEX WASYLIK, Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE I. Summary of Proceedings:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No ,295(11L) REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC07-101 Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No. 2006-71,295(11L) ALEXIS SUMMER MOORE, Respondent. / I. SUMMARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, RONALD HARDY PEACOCK, SC Case No. SC07-1783 TFB File No. 2007-00,671(03) Respondent. / INITIAL BRIEF James A.G. Davey, Jr., Bar Counsel
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No ,577(17J) REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC09-1317 Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No. 2009-50,577(17J) TASHI IANA RICHARDS, Respondent. / REPORT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Case No. SC08-1957 [TFB Case No. 2009-30,436(18A)(CFC)] JEFFREY MERRILL LEUKEL, Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE I. Summary
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos ,011(17B) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC08-1210 Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos. 2007-50,011(17B) 2007-51,629(17B) JANE MARIE LETWIN, Respondent. / AMENDED REPORT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA REPORT OF REFEREE. I. Summary of Proceedings: Pursuant to the undersigned being duly
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, CASE NO.: SC10-862 TFB NO.: 2010-10,855(6A)OSC KEVIN J. HUBBART, Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE I. Summary of Proceedings: Pursuant to
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. TFB File No ,427(8B) REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR Complainant, CASE NO. SC11-1186 TFB File No. 2010-00,427(8B) v. WILLIAM BEDFORD WATSON, III, Respondent, / REPORT OF REFEREE I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS The
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, KELLY KATHRYN MCGRAW, Case No. SC07-964 TFB File No. 2004-00,758(1A) Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE ACCEPTING CONSENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant. v. GARY MARK MILLS, Respondent. / Supreme Court Case No. SC08-833 The Florida Bar File Nos. 2008-51,528(15C)(FFC) 2008-50,724(17A)
More information107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 1 2 3 RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association reaffirms the black letter of the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions as adopted February, 1986, and amended February 1992,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, JOSEPH THOMAS LANDER, Case No. SC10-385 TFB File No. 2009-00,476(03)NFC Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. (Before a Referee) Case No.: SC v. TFB File No.: ,037(07A)(OSC)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Case No.: SC11-1813 v. TFB File No.: 2012-90,037(07A)(OSC) FAYE ESTHER BENNETT, Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE ACCEPTING
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) Complainant, Case No. SC v. TFB File No ,500(1A)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Case No. SC07-226 v. TFB File No. 2005-00,500(1A) ROBERT ANTHONY DEES, Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE ACCEPTING CONSENT
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, SHERRY GRANT HALL, Respondent. / Case No. SC07-863 TFB File No. 2004-01,364(1B) REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Complainant, SC Case No. SC
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA v. Complainant, SC Case No. SC07-1783 TFB File No. 2007-00,671(03) RONALD HARDY PEACOCK, Respondent. / ANSWER BRIEF Clifford L. Adams Counsel for Respondent
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS Definitions Adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court in Grievance Administrator v Lopatin, 462 Mich 235, 238 n 1 (2000) Injury is harm to a
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) No. SC Complainant, v. The Florida Bar File No ,593(15F) DAVID GEORGE ZANARDI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-1740 Complainant, v. The Florida Bar File No. 2005-50,593(15F) DAVID GEORGE ZANARDI Respondent. / REPORT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 119,254. In the Matter of JOHN M. KNOX, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,254 In the Matter of JOHN M. KNOX, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed January 11, 2019. Disbarment.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,674(15D)FFC JAMES HARUTUN BATMASIAN, REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC08-1445 v. The Florida Bar File No. 2008-51,674(15D)FFC JAMES HARUTUN BATMASIAN, Respondent. /
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-114 PER CURIAM. THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. JONATHAN ISAAC ROTSTEIN, Respondent. [November 7, 2002] We have for review a referee s report regarding alleged ethical
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE ACCEPTING CONSENT JUDGMENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC14-1576 Complainant, The F.lorida Bar File v. Nos. 2014-30,298 (18B), 2014-30,843 (09E) LILLIAN CLOVER, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,571(15F) ROBERT BRIAN BAKER, REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-2028 v. The Florida Bar File No. 2005-51,571(15F) ROBERT BRIAN BAKER, Respondent. / REPORT OF
More information} } } } } } } } } } } REPORT OF REFEREE. Pursuant to the undersigned s being duly appointed as Referee to conduct
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (BEFORE A REFEREE) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. MIROSLAW THOMAS LOBASZ, Respondent. CASE NO. SC08-1105 Fla. Bar File 2008-51,498(15C) REPORT OF REFEREE Pursuant to the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File Nos ,023(17C) ,489(17C) WILLIAM ROACH, JR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-1872 v. The Florida Bar File Nos. 2001-51,023(17C) 2003-50,489(17C) WILLIAM ROACH, JR., Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,249(17F) ARTHUR NATHANIEL RAZOR REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant Supreme Court Case No. SC06-11 v. The Florida Bar File No. 2004-51,249(17F) ARTHUR NATHANIEL RAZOR Respondent / REPORT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner/Appellant, Supreme Court Case No. SC09-922 v. PETER MARCELLUS CAPUA, Respondent/Appellee. The Florida Bar File No. 2009-71,123(11H-OSC) / THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ,336(18A), v ,024(18A)] THE FLORIDA BAR'S ANSWER BRIEF AND CROSS INITIAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Case No. SC06-8 [TFB Case Nos. 2004-32,079(18A), Complainant, 2005-31,231(18A), 2005-31,336(18A), v. 2006-30,024(18A)] CHRISTOPHER RUMSEY QUALMANN Respondent.
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC96979 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. MELODY RIDGLEY FORTUNATO, Respondent. [March 22, 2001] PER CURIAM. We have for review a referee s report recommending that attorney
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Case No. SC [TFB No ,112(18B)(CRE)]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Case No. SC10-495 [TFB No. 2010-11,112(18B)(CRE)] IN RE: PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF RICHARD SALVATORE AMARI, / REPORT OF REFEREE ON
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC14-2049 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. CYRUS A. BISCHOFF, Respondent. [March 2, 2017] We have for review a referee s report recommending that Respondent, Cyrus
More information[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Broschak, 118 Ohio St.3d 236, 2008-Ohio-2224.]
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Broschak, 118 Ohio St.3d 236, 2008-Ohio-2224.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BROSCHAK. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Broschak, 118 Ohio St.3d 236, 2008-Ohio-2224.] Attorneys
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER BRIEF
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA v. Complainant, HERMAN THOMAS, Case No. SC11-925 TFB File No. 2009-00,804(2B) Respondent. / ANSWER BRIEF Allison Carden Sackett, Bar Counsel The Florida
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KEISHA M. JONES-JOSEPH NUMBER: 14-DB-035 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD 14-DB-035 8/14/2015 IN RE: KEISHA M. JONES-JOSEPH NUMBER: 14-DB-035 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION This is an attorney discipline matter
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No , 396 (17J) REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-2128 Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No. 2007-50, 396 (17J) ANDREW ALEXANDER BYER, Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE I. SUMMARY
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC11-1863 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. RUSSELL SAMUEL ADLER, Respondent. [November 14, 2013] We have for review a referee s report recommending that Respondent
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC11-1106 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. DAVID LEONARD ROSS, Respondent. [May 29, 2014] We have for review a referee s report recommending that Respondent David
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
09/18/2015 "See News Release 045 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 2015-B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING PER CURIAM This disciplinary
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Before a Referee
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Before a Referee THE FLORIDA BAR, V. Complainant, JOHN R. FORBES, Case No. 76,451 TFB File No. 91-00030-04B Respondent. REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS Pursuant
More informationORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SCOTT ROBERT HYMEL. NUMBER: 13-DB-030 c/w 14-DB-007
ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SCOTT ROBERT HYMEL NUMBER: 13-DB-030 c/w 14-DB-007 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT 13-DB-030 c/w 14-DB-007 6/1/2015 INTRODUCTION This
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1043 IN RE: MARK G. SIMMONS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
10/16/2017 "See News Release 049 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 2017-B-1043 IN RE: MARK G. SIMMONS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING PER CURIAM This disciplinary matter
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-116 PER CURIAM THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. SAUL CIMBLER, Respondent. [November 14, 2002] We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical misconduct
More informationFINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS
People v. Wright, GC98C90. 5/04/99. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board disbarred respondent for his conduct while under suspension. Six counts in the complaint alleged
More informationOpinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board members, Daniel A. Vigil and Mickey W. Smith, both members of the bar.
People v. Espinoza, No. 99PDJ085, 1/18/01. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board suspended Pamela Michelle Espinoza from the practice of law for a period of six months
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Supreme Court Case Nos. SC08-946 SC09-614 v. The Florida Bar File Nos. 2007-51,298(15C) 2008-51,189(15C) A. CLARK CONE,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,512. In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 109,512 In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed October 18, 2013.
More informationS14Y0692. IN THE MATTER OF LAXAVIER P. REDDICK-HOOD. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: October 6, 2014 S14Y0692. IN THE MATTER OF LAXAVIER P. REDDICK-HOOD. PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of
More informationS18Y0833, S18Y0834, S18Y0835, S18Y0836, S18Y0837. IN THE MATTER OF S. QUINN JOHNSON (five cases).
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: June 4, 2018 S18Y0833, S18Y0834, S18Y0835, S18Y0836, S18Y0837. IN THE MATTER OF S. QUINN JOHNSON (five cases). PER CURIAM. This Court rejected the first petition
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) The Florida Bar File No ,076(11J) REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. FRANCIS X. SANTANA, Supreme Court Case No. SC10-2435 The Florida Bar File No. 2010-71,076(11J) Respondent. / REPORT
More information1999. The card is signed by "P. Clemmons." The regular mail was not returned.
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD DOCKET NO. DRB 99-445 IN THE MATTER OF PATIENCE R. CLEMMONS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Default [_R_R. 1:20-4(0(1)] Decided: May 2 2, 2 0 0 0 To the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-2461 IN RE: ANDREW C. CHRISTENBERRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
01/27/2014 "See News Release 005 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-2461 IN RE: ANDREW C. CHRISTENBERRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary
More informationPeople v. Espinoza, No. 00PDJ044 (consolidated with 00PDJ051) 1/30/01. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge ( PDJ ) and Hearing
People v. Espinoza, No. 00PDJ044 (consolidated with 00PDJ051) 1/30/01. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge ( PDJ ) and Hearing Board disbarred Pamela Michelle Espinoza from the practice
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Supreme Court Case No. SC BENJAMIN RAUL ALVAREZ, REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, The Florida Bar File Nos. 2006-71,306(11P) and 2008-70,808 (11P) v. Supreme Court Case No. SC09-217 BENJAMIN RAUL ALVAREZ,
More informationDECISION RE: SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P (b)
People v.woodford, No.02PDJ107 (consolidated with 03PDJ036). July 12, 2004. Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing at which Respondent did not appear, the Hearing Board disbarred Respondent,
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JOSE W. VEGA RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JOSE W. VEGA NUMBER: 16-DB-093 16-DB-093 2/8/2018 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION This attorney discipline matter arises out of formal
More informationPeople v. Ringler. 12PDJ087. June 21, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Victoria Lynne Ringler (Attorney
People v. Ringler. 12PDJ087. June 21, 2013. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Victoria Lynne Ringler (Attorney Registration Number 30727), effective July 26, 2013. Ringler
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-2342 IN RE: CARLA ANN BROWN-MANNING ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
03/04/2016 "See News Release 012 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 2015-B-2342 IN RE: CARLA ANN BROWN-MANNING ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING PER CURIAM This disciplinary
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 107,751 In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE probation. Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed July 6,
More informationORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SATRICA WILLIAMS-BENSAADAT NUMBER: 12-DB-046
ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SATRICA WILLIAMS-BENSAADAT NUMBER: 12-DB-046 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD 12-DB-046 7/27/2015 INTRODUCTION This is a disciplinary
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. The Florida Bar File No ,684(15B) SHELLY GOLDMAN MAURICE, THE FLORIDA BAR S ANSWER BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC04-700 v. The Florida Bar File No. 2002-51,684(15B) SHELLY GOLDMAN MAURICE, Respondent. / THE FLORIDA BAR S ANSWER
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION This attorney disciplinary matter arises out of formal charges
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KEVIN MICHAEL STEEL NUMBER: 17-DB-018 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KEVIN MICHAEL STEEL NUMBER: 17-DB-018 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION This is an attorney discipline matter based upon the filing
More informationPeople v. Jerry R. Atencio. 16PDJ077. April 14, 2017.
People v. Jerry R. Atencio. 16PDJ077. April 14, 2017. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Jerry R. Atencio (attorney registration number 08888) from the practice of
More informationREPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS
People v. Posselius, No.01PDJ062. 03.20.02. Attorney Regulation. The Hearing Board suspended Respondent Edward J. Posselius, attorney registration number 17010 from the practice of law in the State of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. THE FLORIDA BAR, Case No. SC Complainant, TFB Nos ,725(13F) ,532(13F) v.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Case No. SC06-1687 Complainant, TFB Nos. 2004-11,725(13F) 2005-10,532(13F) v. 2005-10,754(13F) EDGAR CALVIN WATKINS, JR. Respondent / ANSWER BRIEF OF THE
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC00-689 PER CURIAM. THE FLORIDA BAR Complainant, vs. HAROLD SILVER, Respondent. [June 21, 2001] The respondent, Harold Silver, has petitioned for review of the referee's report
More informationPeople v. Tolentino. 11PDJ085, consolidated with 12PDJ028. August 16, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Gregory
People v. Tolentino. 11PDJ085, consolidated with 12PDJ028. August 16, 2012. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Gregory S. Tolentino (Attorney Registration Number 40913), effective
More informationOpinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board members, Annita M. Menogan and Laird T. Milburn, both members of the bar.
People v. Ross, No. 99PDJ076, 11/14/00. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board disbarred Respondent, Kirby D. Ross, for conduct arising out of three separate matters. In
More informationS17Y1499, S17Y1502, S17Y1623. IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY SYLVESTER KERR. These disciplinary matters are before the court on the reports filed by
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: September 13, 2017 S17Y1499, S17Y1502, S17Y1623. IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY SYLVESTER KERR. PER CURIAM. These disciplinary matters are before the court on the reports
More informationOpinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board Members Helen R. Stone and Paul Willumstad, both members of the bar.
People v. Corbin, No. 02PDJ039, 11.20.03. Attorney Regulation. The Hearing Board disbarred Respondent Charles C. Corbin, attorney registration number 16382, following a sanctions hearing in this default
More informationDocket No. 26,646 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 2001-NMSC-021, 130 N.M. 627, 29 P.3d 527 August 16, 2001, Filed
1 IN RE QUINTANA, 2001-NMSC-021, 130 N.M. 627, 29 P.3d 527 In the Matter of ORLANDO A. QUINTANA, ESQUIRE, An Attorney Licensed to Practice Law Before the Courts of the State of New Mexico Docket No. 26,646
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
PER CURIAM. Supreme Court of Florida No. SC03-1194 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. MARJORIE HOLLMAN SHOUREAS, Respondent. No. SC03-1333 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. MARJORIE HOLLMAN SHOUREAS, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, GABRIEL I. MARTIN Respondent. / Supreme Court Case No. SC06-2418 The Florida Bar File Nos. 2007-70,046(11M) & 2007-70,934(11M)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, RHONDA S. CLYATT Case No. SC07-1494 TFB File No. 2006-00,283(1A) Respondent. / I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS REPORT OF THE
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. Nos. SC01-1403, SC01-2737, SC02-1592, & SC03-210 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. LEE HOWARD GROSS, Respondent. [March 3, 2005] We have for review a referee s report
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. VSB Docket No , , , ORDER OF REVOCATION
VIRGINIA; BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF BRYAN JAMES WALDRON VSB Docket No. 17-051-106968, 18-051-109817, 18-051-111305, 18-051-111321 ORDER OF REVOCATION THIS
More information[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]
(Filed - April 3, 2008 - Effective August 1, 2008) Rule XI. Disciplinary Proceedings. Section 1. Jurisdiction. [UNCHANGED] Section 2. Grounds for discipline. [SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED] (c)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS: Pursuant to the undersigned being duly
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, ALBERTO JOSE XIQUES, Respondent. / Supreme Court Case No. SC07-1329 The Florida Bar Case No. 2007-71,019(11H) REPORT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1077 IN RE: RAYMOND CHARLES BURKART III ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
11/05/2018 "See News Release 049 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 2018-B-1077 IN RE: RAYMOND CHARLES BURKART III ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING PER CURIAM This disciplinary
More informationpublicly reprimanded in 1994 for violations of RPC 1.3, RPC 1.4(a) and RPC 1.5(c) (failure
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 01-095 IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD B. GIRDLER AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Default ~ 1:20-4(f)] Decided: Oct:ober 16, 2001 To the Honorable
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) The Florida Bar File No ,336(15D) FFC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, vs. Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-2411 The Florida Bar File No. 2007-50,336(15D) FFC JOHN ANTHONY GARCIA, Respondent. / APPELLANT/PETITIONER,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Case No. SC TFB No ,261(13D) JULIAN STANFORD LIFSEY REPORT OF THE REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Complainant, v. Case No. SC07-747 TFB No. 2004-11,261(13D) JULIAN STANFORD LIFSEY Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
More information) No. SB D RICHARD E. CLARK, ) ) No Respondent. ) ) O P I N I O N REVIEW FROM DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION
In the Matter of SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc RICHARD E. CLARK, ) Attorney No. 9052 ) ) Arizona Supreme Court ) No. SB-03-0113-D ) Disciplinary Commission ) No. 00-1066 Respondent. ) ) O P I N I O
More informationOPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS
People v. Pedersen, No. 99PDJ024, 9/21/99. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and the Hearing Board disbarred the respondent, Phillip M. Pedersen, for accepting a retainer, agreeing
More informationPursuant to R. 1 :20-4(f)(l), the District VA Ethics Committee ("DEC") certified the record
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 97-062 and 97-064 IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR N. MARTIN AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Default [R. 1 :20-4(f)(l )] Decided: November 18, 1997
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ANDREW CRAIG CHRISTENBERRY. NUMBER: 03-DB-052 c/w 05-DB-055
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ANDREW CRAIG CHRISTENBERRY NUMBER: 03-DB-052 c/w 05-DB-055 AMENDED RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT This is a disciplinary proceeding based upon
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS: Pursuant to the undersigned being
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. DARYL L. MERL, Supreme Court Case No. SC07-715 The Florida Bar File No. 2007-70,316(11D) Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18 1365 Filed November 9, 2018 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, ELECTRONICALLY FILED NOV 09, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Complainant, vs. DEREK T. MORAN,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC07-2281 Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No. 2006-50,163(15E) JUSSI KUSTAA KIVISTO, Respondent. / REPORT
More informationTo the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the. a certification of default filed by the District IIIB Ethics
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 14-272 District Docket Nos. IIIB-2010-0024E and IIIB-2013-0021E IN THE MATTER OF KATRINA F. WRIGHT AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Decided:
More information~/
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Grievance Committee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. TFB File No. 2009-00,993(2A) ROBERT M KRAMER, Respondent. ------------------------~/ REPORT OF MINOR MISCONDUCT
More informationResPondent was admitted to the New Jersey bar in 1983 and has been in private practice in Lake Hiawatha, Morris County.
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. 95-166 IN THE MATTER "OF RICHARD ONOREVOLE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Argued: September 20, 1995 Decision of the Disciplinary Review Board Decided:
More informationTo the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of. This matter was before us on a certification of the record
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 15-371 District Docket No. VI-2015-0001E IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH A. VENA AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Decided: August 4, 2016 To the
More information