Case 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Similar documents
Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 36 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv ESH -HHK Document 31 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:12-cv UATC-MCR Document 31 Filed 09/13/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2192

Case 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 77 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 48 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 10 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 269 Filed 09/06/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 379 Filed 10/08/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 378 Filed 10/08/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 224 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 380 Filed 10/08/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 71 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 383 Filed 10/08/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 100 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No

Case 1:10-cv ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document 338 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 316 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 176 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 330 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 359 Filed 09/26/12 Page 1 of 4 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 286 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 109 Filed 06/24/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document 24 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv PLF-EGS-DST Document 170 Filed 10/07/2009 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 5:13-cv EFM-DJW Document 126 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 95-4 Filed 10/31/13 Page 1 of 44. Exhibit C Court of Appeals Costs

Plaintiff. The State Board of the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund, Defendant. COURT USE ONLY Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv MW-CAS Document 18 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 220 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document 310 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv PLF-EGS-DST Document 136 Filed 06/13/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 1:06-cv PLF-EGS Document 70-1 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 413 Filed 10/11/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 3 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 289 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv ESH -TBG -HHK Document 49 Filed 09/07/10 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 41 Filed 09/16/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document 127 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 33 Filed 09/23/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 40 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 8:13-cv JSM-AEP Document 17 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv MW-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 11

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ALBANY. Plaintiffs, -against- Index No. 2310~2011

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 7-1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1

Case: /05/2010 Page: 1 of 24 ID: DktEntry: 74. No United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CIVIL DEPARTMENT

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, MANDATORY INJUNCTION, AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION NOTICE OF PRODUCTION

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Filing # E-Filed 11/10/ :27:26 PM

Case 1:17-cv DPG Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 250 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 217

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 329 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge Carr

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Now comes Plaintiff, the Rhode Island Affiliate, American Civil Liberties Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case 1:05-cv SEB-VSS Document 45 Filed 09/08/2005 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 68 Filed 07/25/11 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:08-cv RLY-TAB Document 19 Filed 12/23/2008 Page 1 of 4

Case 5:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS CIVIL DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF FLORIDA Plaintiff, Civ. No. 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and, Defendants, FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, BELINTHIA BERRY, SHARON CARTER, ELLA KATE COFFEE, HOWARD HARRIS, DIANNE HART, YVETTE LEWIS, MARVIN MARTIN, CHARLES MCKENZIE, JR., EARL RUTLEDGE, ALONDA VAUGHAN, AND PAULETTE WALKER Defendant-Intervenors. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, BELINTHIA BERRY, SHARON CARTER, ELLA KATE COFFEE, HOWARD HARRIS, DIANNE HART, YVETTE LEWIS, MARVIN MARTIN, CHARLES MCKENZIE, JR., EARL RUTLEDGE, ALONDA VAUGHAN AND PAULETTE WALKER Defendant-Intervenors Florida State Conference of the NAACP, Belinthia Berry, Sharon Carter, Ella Kate Coffee, Howard Harris, Dianne Hart, Yvette Lewis, Marvin Martin, Charles McKenzie, Jr., Earl Rutledge, Alonda Vaughan, and Paulette Walker (hereinafter, Intervenors ), by undersigned counsel, hereby submit this Answer to the Complaint of Plaintiff State of Florida, dated July 29, 2011 (the Complaint ), as follows:

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 2 of 10 Answers to Allegations 1. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 1 to the extent they describe Plaintiff s status as a State, but deny that Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of its citizens. 2. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 2. 3. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 3, except to the extent that Paragraph 3 suggests that only Defendant Eric H. Holder, Jr, the Attorney General of the United States, may defend a declaratory judgment action under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act ( VRA ) in this Court. Intervenors aver that citizens who reside in covered jurisdictions may defend, and often participate, as defendants in defense of declaratory judgment actions and other matters arising under Section 5 of the VRA. 4. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 4, except to the extent that Paragraph 4 suggests that preclearance is not required for statewide voting changes in Florida. 5. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 5, except to the extent that Paragraph 5 suggests that preclearance is not required for statewide voting changes in Florida. 6. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 6. 7. The allegations in Paragraph 7 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. 8. The allegations in Paragraph 8 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. 9. Intervenors admit the allegations in Paragraph 9, but note that an unprecelared voting change cannot be implemented in any jurisdiction in the state. 10. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 10. 2

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 3 of 10 11. Intervenors admit the allegations in Paragraph 11, but deny that the Plaintiff is entitled to the relief it seeks. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 12. Intervenors admit the allegations in Paragraph 12, but deny that the Plaintiff is entitled to the relief it seeks. 13. Intervenors admit the allegations in Paragraph 13. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 14. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 14. 15. Intervenors admit the allegations of Paragraph 15, except to the extent that Paragraph 15 alleges that the purpose of this action is to allow the State to uniformly enforce changes to the Florida Election Code, which Intervenors deny. 16. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 16. Section 4 (Third Party Voter Registration Organizations) Benchmark Practice Third Party Voter Registration Organizations 17. The allegations in Paragraph 17 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 97.0575, 18. The allegations in Paragraph 18 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 97.021(37), 19. The allegations in Paragraph 19 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 97.0575(1), 3

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 4 of 10 20. The allegations in Paragraph 20 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 97.0575(3), 21. The allegations in Paragraph 21 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that sections 97.0575(2)- (3), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 22. The allegations in Paragraph 22 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 97.0575, 23. The allegations in Paragraph 23 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 97.0575, Changes Sought to Be Precleared Third Party Voter Registration Organizations 24. The allegations in Paragraph 24 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 4, and section 97.0575 et seq, Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 25. The allegations in Paragraph 25 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 4, and section 97.0575 et seq, Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 26. The allegations in Paragraph 26 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 4, and section 97.0575 et seq, Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 4

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 5 of 10 27. The allegations in Paragraph 27 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 4, and section 97.0575 et seq, Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. Purpose and Effect - Third Party Voter Registration Organizations 28. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 28. 29. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 29. Section 23 (Constitutional Amendments Proposed By Initiative) Benchmark Practice Constitutional Amendments Proposed By Initiative 30. The allegations in Paragraph 30 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 101.371, et seq, Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 31. The allegations in Paragraph 31 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 101.371(3) 32. The allegations in Paragraph 32 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that Browning v. Florida Hometown Democracy, Inc., PAC, 29 So. 3d 1053 (Fla. 2010) and section 101.371(6) Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. Changes Sought to Be Precleared Constitutional Amendments Proposed By Initiative 33. The allegations in Paragraph 33 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 7, and section 101.371(3), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 5

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 6 of 10 34. The allegations in Paragraph 34 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 7, and section 101.371(3), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 35. The allegations in Paragraph 35 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 7, and section 101.371(6), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. Purpose and Effect Constitutional Amendments Proposed By Initiative 36. Intervenors lack sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations in Paragraph 36, and demand strict proof thereof. 37. Intervenors lack sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations in Paragraph 37, and demand strict proof thereof. Section 4 (Change of Residence) Benchmark Practice Change of Residence 38. The allegations in Paragraph 38 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that sections 97.1031, and 101.045(1)-(2)(a), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 39. The allegations in Paragraph 39 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 101.045(2), Florida Statutes, speak for itself. 40. The allegations in Paragraph 40 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that sections 101.045(2)(d), and 101.045(1)-(2)(a), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. Changes Sought to Be Precleared Change of Residence 6

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 7 of 10 41. The allegations in Paragraph 41 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 4, and section 101.045(2), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 42. The allegations in Paragraph 42 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 4, and section 101.045(2), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. Purpose and Effect Change of Residence 43. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 43. 44. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 44. 45. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 45. 46. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 46. 7

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 8 of 10 Section 39 (Early Voting) Benchmark Practice Early Voting 47. The allegations in Paragraph 47 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 101.657, 48. The allegations in Paragraph 48 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to which no response is required. If deemed to allege facts, Intervenors aver that section 101.657(1)(c)-(d), Changes Sought to Be Precleared Early Voting 49. The allegations in Paragraph 49 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 39, and section 101.657(1)(c)-(d), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. 50. The allegations in Paragraph 50 are statements of law and/or conclusions of law to Chapter 2011-40, Section 39, and section 101.657(1)(d), Florida Statutes, speak for themselves. Purpose and Effect Early Voting 51. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 51. 52. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 52. 53. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 53. 54. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 54. 55. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 55.

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 9 of 10 CAUSES OF ACTION Count One: Declaratory Judgment Third Party Voter Registration Organizations 56. The allegations in Paragraph 56 do not require a response. 57. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 57. 58. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 58 59. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 59. 60. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 60. 61. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 61. 62. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 62. 63. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 63. Count Two: Declaratory Judgment Constitutional Amendments Proposed By Initiative 64. The allegations in Paragraph 64 do not require a response. 65. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 65. 66. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 66. 67. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 67. 68. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 68. 69. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 69. 70. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 70. 71. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 71. Count Three: Declaratory Judgment Change of Address 72. The allegations in Paragraph 72 do not require a response. 73. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 73. 74. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 74.

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 10 of 10 75. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 75. 76. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 76. 77. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 77. 78. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 78. 79. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 79. Count Four: Declaratory Judgment Early Voting 80. The allegations in Paragraph 80 do not require a response. 81. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 81. 82. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 82. 83. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 83. 84. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 84. 85. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 85. 86. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 86. 87. Intervenors deny the allegations of Paragraph 87. Respectfully submitted, /s John Payton John Payton Director-Counsel Debo P. Adegbile Ryan P. Haygood Dale E. Ho Natasha Korgoankar NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 New York, New York 10013 (212) 965-2200 Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors 10