Are Mexican and U.S. Workers Complements or Substitutes? Raymond Robertson Texas A&M University and IZA

Similar documents
Wage Convergence and Texas-Mexican Economic Integration. Raymond Robertson Texas A&M University and IZA

GDP per capita growth

Trade Costs and Export Decisions

Employment debate in the context of NAFTA. September 2017

04/03/2013. Chapter 6 Trade between similar countries

Benefits and Challenges of Trade under NAFTA: The Case of Texas

Mexico Open Market. Mexico is positioned as a gateway to a potential market of more than one billion consumers and 60% of world GDP.

Contents About this Report August 2017 Border Summary Housing

Contents About this Report September 2017 Border Summary Housing

Raymundo Miguel Campos-Vázquez. Center for Economic Studies, El Colegio de México, and consultant to the OECD. and. José Antonio Rodríguez-López

Has NAFTA Increased Labor Market Integration between the United States and Mexico?

11.433J / J Real Estate Economics

Mexico s Update Global Spa & Wellness Summit. Aspen, CO June 4, 2012

UNION COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, FALL 2004 ECO 146 SEMINAR IN GLOBAL ECONOMIC ISSUES GLOBALIZATION AND LABOR MARKETS

Trade Policy and Industrial Development. Lessons from Mexico

Parliamentary Research Branch FREE TRADE IN NORTH AMERICA: THE MAQUILADORA FACTOR. Guy Beaumier Economics Division. December 1990

Trade, FDI, migration, and the place premium: Mexico and the United States. Davide Gandolfi, Timothy Halliday & Raymond Robertson

SOME FACTS ABOUT MEXICO'S TRADE

UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX AUTUMN 2016 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS EC367 INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASSIGNMENT. Term Paper

Trade Policy, Agreements and Taxation of Multinationals

Foreign Investment Boom. Jump in Maquiladora Employment. Export Surge to the United States. January 2001 Seven Years Under NAFTA

ARE MIGRATION AND FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS PATHWAYS FOR DEVELOPMENT? LESSONS FROM THE MEXICAN EXPERIENCE. Raúl Delgado Wise

FOREIGN FIRMS AND INDONESIAN MANUFACTURING WAGES: AN ANALYSIS WITH PANEL DATA

CCIS. Globalization and its Impact on Migration in Agricultural Communities in Mexico. José Martínez University of California, San Diego

University of Hawai`i at Mānoa Department of Economics Working Paper Series

Study Questions (with Answers) Lecture 18 Preferential Trading Arrangements

Maquiladora Recovery: Lessons for the Future By Jesus Cañas, Roberto Coronado and Robert W. Gilmer

Simon Fraser University Department of Economics. Econ342: International Trade. Mid-Term Examination

THE EMPLOYMENT CONSEQUENCES OF NAFTA

Kiel Institute for the World Economy

US Benefits of Outward FDI. Peterson Institute for International Economics September 19, 2013 Lindsay Oldenski Georgetown University

ADJUSTMENT TO TRADE POLICY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Competitiveness: A Blessing or a Curse for Gender Equality? Yana van der Muelen Rodgers

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. Special thanks for advisory contributions on this issue from

Recent trade liberalization efforts, including the North American Free Trade Agreement

The case of Mexico and the United States of America as a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement

Brújula Volume 10 Spring Perspectives. Economic Perspectives on Falling Inequality in Brazil. Raymond Robertson Macalester College

Migration and FDI Facts

Globalization: The Rise of International Trade and Integration of World Capital Markets. Econ 4960: Economic Growth. Global dimensions of business

Labor market consequences of trade openness and competition in foreign markets

WE LL WORK THESE TOGETHER IN CLASS PRIOR TO THE HOMEWORK DAY

262 Index. D demand shocks, 146n demographic variables, 103tn

Manufacturing in queretaro. everything you need to know

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS HOUSTON BRANCH MARCH 2005

Welcome. Our region Outlook for Tucson. A Look Ahead 6/6/ Breakfast with the Economists ebr.eller.arizona.edu

Trade Liberalization and Wage Inequality in India: A Mandated Wage Equation Approach

Who Gains From Trade Reform? Some Remaining Puzzles

Inflation and relative price variability in Mexico: the role of remittances

North American Free Trade Agreement

Cleavages in Public Preferences about Globalization

Defining North American Economic Integration

INDONESIA AND THE LEWIS TURNING POINT: EMPLOYMENT AND WAGE TRENDS

Is Mexico a Lumpy Country?

Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and International Flow of Labor: OECD Countries

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES IMMIGRANTS, MINORITIES, AND LABOR MARKET COMPETITION. George J. Borjas. Working Paper No. 2028

Trade, Migration, and the Place Premium: Mexico and the United States

Trade, skill-biased technical change and wages in Mexican manufacturing

Wage inequality and skill premium

Producing International Merchandise Trade Statistics in Mexico and Implementation of the new recommendations

The China Syndrome. Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. David H. Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon H.

Parental Response to Changes in Return to Education for Children: The Case of Mexico. Kaveh Majlesi. October 2012 PRELIMINARY-DO NOT CITE

Lecture: INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Midterm Exam Economics 181 PLEASE SHOW YOUR WORK! PUT YOUR NAME AND TA s NAME ON ALL PAGES 100 Points Total

Is Mexico a Lumpy Country?

Mexico s Wage Gap Charts

Notes on exam in International Economics, 16 January, Answer the following five questions in a short and concise fashion: (5 points each)

The gendered labor market impacts of trade liberalization: evidence from Brazil * Isis Gaddis The World Bank

Chapter 5. Resources and Trade: The Heckscher-Ohlin

World Bank Employment Policy Primer March 2008 No. 9

Foreign Direct Investment and Wages in Indonesian Manufacturing

Vista. The Texas Mexico border is a fast-growing region, a complex blend of U.S. and Mexican cultures, languages and customs.

International Import Competition and the Decision to Migrate: Evidence from Mexico

Globalization, Wages and Working Conditions: An Agenda for Research

Chapter 5. Resources and Trade: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model

Vertical FDI? A Host Country Perspective

Defining Economic Opportunities, Potential, and Challenges Confronting the US Mexico Border Region and Strategies for Enhanced Prosperity

Tracking Wage Inequality Trends with Prices and Different Trade Models

INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT OF RESOURCES ECO 41 UDAYAN ROY

Policy brief ARE WE RECOVERING YET? JOBS AND WAGES IN CALIFORNIA OVER THE PERIOD ARINDRAJIT DUBE, PH.D. Executive Summary AUGUST 31, 2005

Chapter 4. Preview. Introduction. Resources, Comparative Advantage, and Income Distribution

Working Paper Series

Shopping on the Border: The Mexican Peso and U.S. Border Communities. March, 2001

Volume URL: Chapter Title: On the Labor Market Effects of Immigration and Trade

ICT, Offshoring, and the Demand for Part-time Workers: The Case of Japanese Manufacturing

Hispanic Employment in Construction

At the end of Chapter 27, you will be able to answer the following questions:

NAFTA, TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT

Low-Skill Jobs A Shrinking Share of the Rural Economy

Skilled Immigration and the Employment Structures of US Firms

IMMIGRANTS, MINORITIES, AND LABOR MARKET COMPETITION

Can free-trade policies help to reduce gender inequalities in employment and wages?

Brazil, Cuba & Mexico

agree that the treaty was beneficial and it made a significance in the economic relations between

Christopher Wilson. U.S.-Mexico Trade and the New NAFTA Negotiations

MAQUILADORA OPERATIONS

Midterm Exam Econ 355. Time allowed: 70 minutes (1 hour and 10 minutes)


How Job Characteristics Affect International Migration: The Role of Informality in Mexico

Mexican Migrant Labor and Southern Plains Labor: Compatible or Exclusive

Volume 35, Issue 1. An examination of the effect of immigration on income inequality: A Gini index approach

Transcription:

Are Mexican and U.S. Workers Complements or Substitutes? Raymond Robertson Texas A&M University and IZA

Motivation US Concerns about NAFTA Competition between Mexican and U.S. workers Assessing structure of trade Comparing implications of trade models Heckscher-Ohlin Increasing returns/fragmentation models

US-Mexican Wage Differential

Falling U.S. Manufacturing Employment 10000 15000 20000 1940m1 1960m1 1980m1 2000m1 2020m1 time

Post NAFTA.16 Mexico Share of US Exports Fitted values.12.08.04 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 Year

Production Worker Hours 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 2006m1 2008m1 2010m1 2012m1 2014m1 2016m1 2018m1 time U.S. Obrero Hours 13.8 13.9 14 14.1 Mexican Obrero Hours U.S. Obrero Hours

Nominal Exchange Rates Pesos per Dollar 10 12 14 16 18 20 2006m1 2008m1 2010m1 2012m1 2014m1 2016m1 2018m1 time

Theoretic Background Heckscher-Ohlin (neoclassical) trade model predicts that U.S. production workers and Mexican Nonproduction workers are complements Mexican Production workers are substitutes Fragmentation models predict the opposite Apply labor demand approach (Hamermesh 1993)

Theoretical Framework Model North American production with a single cost function us _ u mx _ s mx _ u it it it it C G( w, w, w, Y ) Derive a system of labor demand functions L w w w y us _ u us _ u mx _ s mx _ u mx it 0 1 it 2 it 3 it 4 it it L w w w y mx _ s us _ u mx _ s mx _ u mx it 0 1 it 2 it 3 it 4 it it L w w w y mx _ u us _ u mx _ s mx _ u mx it 0 1 it 2 it 3 it 4 it it

Estimation Issues Estimate the system using Zellner s Seemingly Unrelated Regressions model Include industry fixed effects Theory implies constraints Symmetry Homogeneity

Data: United States Current Employment Statistics Covers about 300,000 employer units Over 35% of total payroll employment. Conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Do not include value of production or earnings of nonproduction workers. Hours and earnings data are available for about 850 industries.

Data: Mexico Monthly Industrial Survey (EIM) The Mexican National Institute for Statistics, Geography, and Informatics (Instituto Nactional de Estadística, Geografia, e Informatica,or INEGI ) conducts the survey. Data for 205 industries are available on the internet. Cover 80% of Mexican manufacturing production. The survey design is based in the Mexican Industrial Census, which is taken every five years. For the period covered in this paper, the survey covers between 5,587 and 6,884 establishments. The survey excludes firms in the maquiladora industry, basic petrochemicals, petroleum refining, and firms with fifteen or fewer employees ( microindustria ). Variables include employment, hours, and wages for production ( obreros ) and nonproduction ( empleados ) workers, as well as the value of production and sales.

Estimation Results: 2007-2017 (1) (2) (3) Constant Output US Blue Collar Constant Output MX White Collar Constant Output MX Blue Collar US Hourly Wage Blue -1.197 0.362-0.251 (3.08)** (4.17)** (2.50)* MX Hourly Wage White 0.362-0.323 0.267 (4.17)** (5.17)** (3.75)** MX Hourly Wage Blue -0.251 0.267-0.375 (2.50)* (3.75)** (4.54)** Production Value 2.344 4.279 7.837 (2.28)* (10.08)** (14.78)**

Additional Results Aggregation Levels Same significant results No clear pattern of change over aggregate level By Industry Very strong results for apparel Weak results for chemicals Mixed results for automobiles

Robustness Checks Nominal and real pesos With and without exchange rates With and without industry fixed effects With and without output With and without constraints Homogeneity Symmetry Different periods

Estimation Results: 1994-2007 (1) (2) (3) Constant Output US Blue Collar Constant Output MX White Collar Constant Output MX Blue Collar US Hourly Wage Blue -0.802 0.050-0.229 (0.033)** (0.008)** (0.008)** MX Hourly Wage White 0.050-0.123-0.003 (0.008)** (0.005)** (0.004) MX Hourly Wage Blue -0.229-0.003-0.164 (0.008)** (0.004) (0.005)** Production Value 0.088 0.237 0.351 (0.005)** (0.005)** (0.005)**

Estimation Results: 1987-1994 (1) (2) (3) Constant Output US Blue Collar Constant Output MX White Collar Constant Output MX Blue Collar US Hourly Wage Blue -1.208-0.044 0.040 (0.041)** (0.008)** (0.009)** MX Hourly Wage White -0.044-0.173-0.017 (0.008)** (0.008)** (0.007)* MX Hourly Wage Blue 0.040-0.017-0.204 (0.009)** (0.007)* (0.009)** Production Value 0.058 0.197 0.234 (0.006)** (0.009)** (0.009)**

Results Summary Post-NAFTA: U.S. production workers are complements with Mexican production workers Post-NAFTA: U.S. production workers are substitutes for Mexican production workers Prior to NAFTA: Opposite relationship

Policy Implications Clear evidence of integration across value chains Specialization according to skill Revisions of NAFTA need to maintain cross-border integration Lessons from adjustment costs: can t save US employment through trade policy Exchange rates and NX