On Defendants Motion to Dismiss. GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.

Similar documents
Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART. ORDER

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY. Plaintiff,

IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY

Submitted: April 24, 2006 Decided: May 22, 2006

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

REPEALED LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266

EFiled: Jul :01PM EDT Transaction ID Case No VCL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY SCARNATI, CORMAN AND GORDNER, JANUARY 30, 2017

Date Submitted: February 5, 2010 Date Decided: March 4, Sunrise Ventures, LLC v. Rehoboth Canal Ventures, LLC C.A. No.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 5 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

STATE OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 5 1

Ross: Civil Liability in Criminal Justice, 6th Edition

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY SCARNATI, CORMAN AND GORDNER, JANUARY 30, 2017 AN ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

Budis v Skoutelas 2014 NY Slip Op 32203(U) July 16, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Orin R. Kitzes Cases posted with a

COMPLAINT. Apartments at Riverfront Heights ( Defendant or Evergreen ) is a Delaware

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No WARDELL LEROY GILES, Appellant

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL AN ACT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION. Submitted April 19, 2016 Decided. Before Judges Fisher, Espinosa, and Currier.

1998 Survey of Rhode Island Law: Cases: Statute of Limitations

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY. Plaintiff, : v. : C.A. No. 03C SCD. Defendants.

Date Submitted: May 28, 2009 Date Decided: May 29, 2009

NC General Statutes - Chapter 30 Article 4 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

MASSACHUSETTS STATUTES (source: CHAPTER 204. GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATIVE TO SALES, MORTGAGES, RELEASES, COMPROMISES, ETC.

following in the above-referenced cause of action : COMMON ALLEGATIONS times material herein was a resident of Polk County, Iowa.

Estate Planning Highlights of the 2017 Texas Legislature Prof. Gerry W. Beyer

Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS Robert W. Curran, Judge. This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in an

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Dr. Gerry W. Beyer Governor Preston E. Smith Regents Professor of Law Texas Tech University School of Law

NC General Statutes - Chapter 28A Article 2 1

CHAPTER 60:02 TITLE TO LAND (PRESCRIPTION AND LIMITATION) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER

On February 5, 2008, Defendants, Gulfport Energy Corporation ("Gulfport"), Mike

plaintiff claiming to be the administratrix of a decedent's estate, but who filed the action prior to qualifying as such, is

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO 8 DEL. C. 211

SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 12 CVS 1742

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 8 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

Case 2:06-cv JS-WDW Document 18 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 1 of 13. Plaintiffs,

EXHIBIT 1 APPLICATION FOR REFUND OF CAPITAL CREDITS OF, DECEASED OF COUNTY, GEORGIA

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. ) ) C.A. No VCN

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

As Passed by the House. Regular Session Sub. S. B. No

Certification, Waiver, and Release By Parents/Guardians Regarding Independent Caregiver s Prior Criminal History

BELIZE LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 170 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

Case 1:06-cv MPT Document 12 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY

[Note: Father George A. Berthiaume, named in this complaint, died on 12/3/85.] COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Number 41 of 1961 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 REVISED. Updated to 13 April 2017

Davis v Cohen & Gresser LLP NY Slip Op 50417(U) Decided on March 24, Supreme Court, New York County. Ramos, J.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Washington, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT

The Limitation of Actions Act

John Reardon. Mark Plantier. No. 12-CV and. Joseph Bohi and Mark Plantier. John Reardon. No. 12-CV ORDER

Doe v. Linam, 225 F. Supp. 2d 731 (S.D. Tex. 2002)

CM Growth Capital Partners v Penn 2018 NY Slip Op 33430(U) January 2, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: O.

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE. Chapter 7. Miscellaneous Petitions

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CULPEPER COUNTY John R. Cullen, Judge. In these consolidated interlocutory appeals arising from

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT PARTIES. 1. Plaintiffs JOHN DOE No. 70 ("JOHN No. 70"), and JOHN DOE No. 71 ("JOHN No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

6/8/2018 POWER OF ATTORNEY USES & ABUSES AUTHORITY REVOKE COMPLICATED

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 30 1

Case 2:17-cv TR Document 22 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 5 July 2016

Estates, Trusts, and Wills

2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

THE LAW OF LIMITATION ACT, 1971 PART I. Title PART II

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Report of the Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Section

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Transition to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act of This chapter may be cited as the "Criminal Injuries Compensation Act.

Matter of Lublin 2013 NY Slip Op 33542(U) December 19, 2013 Sur Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Edward W.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

United States Court of Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 9, 2007 Session

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv ER Document 152 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA O R D E R

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION

ROADMAP OF AN M&A TRANSACTION ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL PRESENTATION BY VINCE GAROZZO, GREENSFELDER HEMKER & GALE, P.C.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Transcription:

EFiled: May 11 2009 12:32PM EDT Transaction ID 25113046 Case No. 08C-11-097 CLS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY WILLIAM J. HEANEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WILMINGTON, et al., Defendants. C. A. No.: 08C-11-097 CLS Submitted: March 13, 2009 Decided: May 11, 2009 On Defendants Motion to Dismiss. GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART. SCOTT, J.

Introduction Presently before the Court is Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Defendants argue that Plaintiffs claims are barred by the statute of limitations and are not revived by the Delaware Child Victim s Act. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that Plaintiffs wrongful death action is dismissed as untimely but the survival action brought on behalf of the decedent s estate is proper. Facts According to the Complaint, Kevin Heaney was sexually abused as a child by former Roman Catholic Priest, Edward Dudzinski, from 1978-1981 when he was between the ages of ten and thirteen. Kevin Heaney died in 1987 at age 19. 1 His parents, William J. Heaney and Othell Heaney, filed this suit in November 2008 pursuant to 10 Del. C. 8145, the Delaware Child Victim s Act. 2 They claim damages from assault and battery, negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, breach of contract and implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conspiracy and aiding and abetting. 1 Compl., Docket Item ( D.I. 1. 2 Effective July 10, 2007, the Act created a two year window, allowing victims of childhood sexual abuse to bring civil suits previously barred by the statute of limitations. Whitwell v. Archmere Academy, Inc., 2008 WL 1735370, at *1. 2

Plaintiffs William J. Heaney and Othell Heaney bring the wrongful death action on their own behalf. Plaintiff William J. Heaney brings the survival action on behalf of Kevin Heaney in his capacity as the personal representative of the Estate of Kevin Heaney. On January 21, 2009, Defendants filed this Motion to Dismiss. 3 In the motion, they argue that Plaintiffs wrongful death claim must be dismissed because it is time barred and the cause of action is not revived by the Child Victim s Act. Defendants claim that Plaintiffs remaining claims are also barred by the statute of limitations and are not revived by the Child Victim s Act because Plaintiffs are not victims recognized under the Act. Discussion Plaintiffs wrongful death action is barred by the statute of limitations and it is not revived by the Child Victim s Act. Delaware's Wrongful Death Act provides, [a]n action may be maintained against a person whose wrongful act causes the death of another. 4 However, a wrongful death claim must be brought within two years of the victim s death. 5 Kevin Heaney died in 1987 thus Plaintiffs cause of action for wrongful death expired in 1989. 3 Defs. Mot. to Dismiss, D.I. 34. 4 10 Del. C. 3722(a. 5 See 10 Del. C. 8107. 3

Plaintiffs wrongful death action is not revived by 10 Del. C. 8145. Section 8145(b of the Act provides: For a period of 2 years following the effective date of this section, victims of child sexual abuse that occurred in this State who have been barred from filing suit against their abusers by virtue of the expiration of the former civil statute of limitations, shall be permitted to file those claims in the Superior Court of this State. (emphasis added. The language of the act is clear. The legislature s use of the term victims in the context of filing suits against their abuser indicates that the right to bring a revived cause of action under this Act lies solely with the victim. The right to bring a wrongful death claim lies with the spouse, parent and child of the deceased, not with the victim himself. 6 Because the Child Victim s Act is not meant to revive the claims of parties other than the victim, it cannot be said to reopen the statute of limitations for wrongful death claims. This claim is therefore dismissed as untimely. A survival action, however, is separate and distinct from a wrongful death action. A survival action is defined under Delaware law as follows: All causes of action, except actions for defamation, malicious prosecution, or upon penal statutes, shall survive to and against the executors or administrators of the person to, or against whom, the cause of action accrued. Accordingly, all actions, so surviving, may be instituted or prosecuted by or against the executors or administrators of the person to or against whom the cause of action accrued. This section shall not affect the 6 10 Del. C. 3724(a. 4

survivorship among the original parties to a joint cause of action. 7 Although otherwise time barred, civil causes of action for sexual abuse based upon sexual acts that would constitute a criminal offense under the Delaware Code are revived by the Child Victim s Act. They may be brought as a survival action by Plaintiff William J. Heaney in his capacity as the personal representative of the Estate of Kevin Heaney. The Delaware Supreme Court has described a survival action as a continuation of a right of action which accrued to the deceased at common law and which he could have maintained himself but for his death thereafter. Recovery under a survival action is measured by the pecuniary loss occasioned to the deceased himself, and therefore to his estate. 8 There is no dispute that if Kevin Heaney were alive today, he would be recognized as a victim under the Child Victim s Act and thus he would have a right of action against Defendants. Because Kevin Heaney is now deceased, the right to pursue his cause of action is vested in his estate. Therefore, William J. Heaney, acting as the personal representative of the Estate of Kevin Heaney is a proper 7 10 Del. C. 3701. 8 Emmons v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co, 697 A.2d 742 (Del. 1997, citing Thompson v. D'Angelo, 320 A.2d 729, 733 (Del.1974. 5

plaintiff to bring the survival action pursuant to the Child Victim s Act. Accordingly, Plaintiffs wrongful death claim is dismissed. Plaintiff William J. Heaney, acting in his capacity as the personal representative of the Estate of Kevin Heaney may proceed with the survival action. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Calvin L. Scott Judge Calvin L. Scott, Jr. 6