Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 9

Similar documents
Case: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Plaintiffs OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS v. Defendants JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION, JURY DEMAND AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Middle District Court Case No. 6:10-cv Career Network, Inc. et al v. WOT Services, Ltd. et al.

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. 8:11-cv JDW-MAP

Case 1:16-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:11-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO.

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

Case 1:11-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Case 2:13-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/10/13 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 28 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID 437 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

1. The Plaintiff, Richard N. Bell, took photograph of the Indianapolis Skyline in

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF NORFOLK

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 12 Filed 06/01/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 9:17-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2017 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOURTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHER DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:16-cv S-LDA Document 3 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 15

Page 1 of 8 TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: SARAH ( SALLY ) WARWICK

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff SCOTT STEPHENS (hereinafter Plaintiff ) through his attorney respectfully alleges: INTRODUCTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/21/2013

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF RICHLAND ) DAWN M. ST ALEY, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS FILE NO.

) ) Plaintiff, Christina Chisholm, complaining of Defendants, Tauheed Epps, and. Ro Zay Richie, alleges and says:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2016

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No.

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 1:11-cv CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv FAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:14-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 08/29/14 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:09-cv LDG-RJJ Document 1 Filed 11/06/2009 Page 1 of 15

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/22/ :31 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:14-cv TBR Document 1 Filed 07/28/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:17-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 58

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Courthouse News Service

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No: PETITION THE PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of LAW OFFICES OF P. STERLING KERR ATTORNEYS AT LAW 0 St. Rose Parkway, Suite, Henderson, Nevada 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - 0 P. STERLING KERR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. GEORGE E. ROBINSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. LAW OFFICES OF P. STERLING KERR 0 St. Rose Parkway, Suite Henderson, Nevada 0 Telephone No. (0) Facsimile No. (0) - Email: sterling@sterlingkerrlaw.com Email: george@sterlingkerrlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs INTERNATIONAL MARKETS LIVE, INC., a New York corporation dba imarketslive; CHRISTOPHER TERRY, an individual; v. Plaintiffs, JOEL SANTIAGO dba COPY PROFIT SUCCESS GLOBAL; JOE OTIS dba COPY PROFIT SUCCESS GLOBAL; MUHAMMAD ZIDAN aka MACK MILLS, an individual GREGORY PERDRIEL, an individual; CARLOS SANTIAGO, an individual; ROBBIE ISSA, an individual; Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No.: :-cv- COMPLAINT FOR: ) DEFAMATION PER SE; ) TRADE LIBEL; ) TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS; ) TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE; and ) CIVIL CONSPIRACY COMES NOW, Plaintiffs by and through their attorneys, the Law Offices of P. Sterling Kerr, complain and allege against Defendants JOEL SANTIAGO and JOE OTIS dba COPY PROFIT SUCCESS GLOBAL (hereinafter collectively known as CPSG ), Defendant dba COPY PROFIT SUCCESS GLOBAL, Defendant MUHAMMAD ZIDAN aka MACK MILLS (hereinafter Mills ), GREGORY PERDRIEL (hereinafter Perdriel ), CARLOS SANTIAGO (hereinafter Santiago ), and ROBBIE ISSA (hereinafter Issa ) as follows: / / / / / / Page of

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 THE PARTIES. Plaintiff INTERNATIONAL MARKETS LIVE dba imarketslive (hereinafter IML ) is, and at all times relevant herein was, a New York corporation.. Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER TERRY (hereinafter Terry ) is an individual and is, and at all times relevant, a Nevada resident.. Defendants JOEL SANTIAGO dba COPY PROFIT SUCCESS GLOBAL, is an individual and, upon information and belief, a Wisconsin resident.. Defendants JOE OTIS dba COPY PROFIT SUCCESS GLOBAL is an individual and, upon information and belief, a Georgia resident.. Defendant MUHAMMAD ZIDAN aka MACK MILLS is an individual and, upon information and belief, a Florida resident.. GREGORY PERDRIEL is an individual and, upon information and belief, a Florida resident.. CARLOS SANTIAGO is an individual and, upon information and belief, a Florida resident.. ROBBIE ISSA is an individual and, upon information and belief, a New York resident. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This Court has diversity subject matter jurisdiction of this action. The Court has diversity jurisdiction under U.S.C. because no Plaintiffs and Defendants are residents of the same state, and because the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds seventy-five thousand dollars ($,000.00). 0. Venue is proper as TERRY is a resident of the state of Nevada. Page of

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS. Plaintiff IML is a multi-level marketing organization that sells educational products regarding the trading of Foreign currencies.. Plaintiff Terry is the CEO of IML.. Defendants Joel Santiago and Joe Otis are the founders of CPSG.. Upon information and belief, CPSG is a multi-level marketing organization that is advertising on the internet that it will sell products regarding trading Foreign currencies in the future.. Employees of CPSG are posting defamatory statements on the internet about IML in an attempt to discredit and undermine IML and sell CPSG s products.. The employees posts are made at the direction of CPGS.. The employees posting the defamatory statements on behalf of CPSG are Mills, Perdriel, Santiago, and Issa.. Mack Mills has a Facebook account at https://www.facebook.com/returnofthemack where he publishes defamatory and other tortious statements against Plaintiffs.. On May, at :0 pm, Mack Mills posted the following entry on Facebook, CPS they re grrreat!! www.secureyourposition.com #Grrr. Mack Mills posted on Facebook, How s IML different from CPS? Ones illegal and one isn t but allow me to elaborate on your stupid questions LIVE and then visit www.mackshugelaunch.com.. CPSG s website lists Perdriel as an online marketer for CPSG.. Perdriel has a Facebook account at https://www.facebook.com/kashiz.kingiv where he publishes defamatory and other tortious statements against Plaintiffs. Page of

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. On May,, Perdriel posts on Facebook, When the other MLM CEO sets up an emergency state of the... company wide call, things are gettin sticky. On May,, Perdriel posts on Facebook, Truth Hurts... Months Left. Deranking & No Pay Sources Exposed.. Santiago has a Facebook account at https://www.facebook.com/emma.locket. where he publishes defamatory and other tortious statements against Plaintiffs.. On June,, Santiago posts to Facebook, IML affiliates are so scared that they re reporting CPSG links on facebook as fraudulent y all have days left. On June,, Santiago posts to Facebook Welp, IML got sued... (nd one on the way) former chairmans left, more deranking hatnin but I M the fake news. On June,, Santiago posts to Facebook, Damn!! as if things weren t already bad enough IML has another force that s about to take their downline A $ decision is gonna cripple them hotel meeting boys. On June,, Santiago posts to Facebook, Both MCA and IML about to take a hit this year 0. Santiago has a Facebook account at https://www.facebook.com/emma.locket. where. On May,, Santiago posts to Facebook, imarketslive has days left.. On May,, Santiago posts to Facebook, IML affiliates are jumping ship by the masses. People are deranking left and right. Worst part is: They are not telling anyone!. Issa has a Facebook account at https://www.facebook.com/robbie.trader.issa where he publishes defamatory and other tortious statements against Plaintiffs. Page of

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. On May,, Issa posts to Facebook May,, Best therapy ever FUCK IML SCAM Fuck Chris Terry and the hole he crawled out of. Yeah just like that. Cause I can.. On May,, Issa posts to Facebook, FUCK IML SCAM I m right here Chris come and get me, cross recruit is bitch tradewithrobbie.com.. On numerous occasions on these social media platforms, one Defendant will post defamatory statements, and then one or more other Defendants will comment below on the posts, reaffirming the statements and making other defamatory statements in the comments section.. In addition to the foregoing, there are other tortious and harmful statements against Plaintiffs published on websites controlled by the Defendants. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Defamation Per Se against Defendants). Plaintiffs incorporate by reference and reaffirm each and every allegation previously. The statements, as cited in the general allegations, tend to harm the reputation of the Plaintiffs in the estimation of the community and deter third persons from associating or dealing with Plaintiffs. 0. The statements, as cited in the general allegations, are false.. The statements, as cited in the general allegations, were intentionally published on the internet.. The statements, as cited in the general allegations constitute the imputation that Plaintiffs have committed a crime; and/or Plaintiffs lack of fitness for trade, business, or profession. Page of

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants defamatory acts, Plaintiffs has been harmed in amount in excess of one million dollars ($,000,000.00).. It has been necessary for Plaintiffs to retain the services of an attorney to prosecute this action and, therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to reasonable attorney s fees and costs, prejudgment interest, and such other and further relief the court deems proper resulting from this action. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Trade Libel against Defendants). Plaintiffs incorporate by reference and reaffirm each and every allegation previously. The statements, as cited in the general allegations, about the Plaintiffs were published on the internet.. The statements, as cited in the general allegations, disparage the quality of IML s trading services.. The statements, as cited in the general allegations, are false.. The statements, as cited in the general allegations, were intentionally published on the internet. 0. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants trade libel, Plaintiffs has been harmed in amount in excess of one million dollars ($,000,000.00).. It has been necessary for Plaintiffs to retain the services of an attorney to prosecute this action and, therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to reasonable attorney s fees and costs, prejudgment interest, and such other and further relief the court deems proper resulting from this action. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations against Defendants). Plaintiffs incorporate by reference and reaffirm each and every allegation previously Page of

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Plaintiff IML had contractual relationships with customers and individual representatives who desired participate in receiving educational products for Forex markets.. Defendants knew of these relationships.. Defendants spread false information and affirmatively filed false complaints with regulators with the intent of disrupting Plaintiffs s relationships with its customers.. Defendants conduct was not legally justified.. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants interference with IML s contractual relationships, Plaintiffs has been harmed in amount in excess of one million dollars ($,000,000.00).. It has been necessary for Plaintiffs to retain the services of an attorney to prosecute this action and, therefore, Plaintiffs is entitled to reasonable attorney s fees and costs, prejudgment interest, and such other and further relief the court deems proper resulting from this action. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Tortious Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage against Defendants). Plaintiffs incorporate by reference and reaffirm each and every allegation previously 0. Plaintiff IML had prospective contractual relationships with customers and individual representatives who desired to participate in receiving educational products for Forex markets.. Defendants knew of these prospective relationships.. Defendants spread false information and affirmatively filed false complaints with regulators with the intent of preventing and inhibiting Plaintiffs relationships with the prospective customers.. Defendants conduct was not legally justified. Page of

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants interference with the prospective customer relationships, Plaintiff has been harmed in amount in excess of one million dollars ($,000,000.00).. It has been necessary for Plaintiffs to retain the services of an attorney to prosecute this action and, therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable attorney s fees and costs, prejudgment interest, and such other and further relief the court deems proper resulting from this action. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Civil Conspiracy against Defendants). Plaintiffs incorporates by reference and reaffirm each and every allegation previously. Defendants have taken concerted action in defaming Plaintiffs and committing tortious interference with contractual relations and tortious interference with contractual relations.. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants civil conspiracy, Plaintiffs have been harmed in amount in excess of one million dollars ($,000,000.00).. It has been necessary for Plaintiffs to retain the services of an attorney to prosecute this action and, therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to reasonable attorney s fees and costs, prejudgment interest, and such other and further relief the court deems proper resulting from this action. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS PRAY FOR THE FOLLOWING RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS:. For Damages in an amount greater than $,000,000.00 as a result of Defendants defamatory and tortious actions;. For injunctive relief to enjoin the Defendants from continuing to commit the defamatory and tortious actions; Page of

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. For an award of pre-judgment interest, as well as reasonable attorneys fees as both normal and special damages, and other costs; and. For such other and further relief that this Court deems just and proper. Dated this th day of June, LAW OFFICES OF P. STERLING KERR /s/ George E. Robinson P. STERLING KERR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. GEORGE E. ROBINSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. LAW OFFICES OF P. STERLING KERR 0 St. Rose Parkway, Suite Henderson, Nevada 0 Telephone No. (0) - Facsimile No. (0) - Email: sterling@sterlingkerrlaw.com Email: george@sterlingkerrlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Page of