Courthouse News Service

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES REVISED PLAN FOR COMPLIANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 53 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 106 Filed 08/27/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 26-2 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv MDH Document 1 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 217

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 374 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 9 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, by and through

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv ELH Document 1 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 0:16-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2016 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/14/17 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 84-1 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Courthouse News Service

Plaintiff. The State Board of the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund, Defendant. COURT USE ONLY Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv NGG-VMS Document 13 Filed 12/10/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 87

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

CIVIL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 210

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv PAG Document 14 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv CKK Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV- COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF COMPLAINT

Case 1:13-cv JG-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 48 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Now comes Plaintiff, the Rhode Island Affiliate, American Civil Liberties Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No.

Case 1:08-cv JEB Document 50 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:18-cv CWR-FKB Document 9 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Defendant State of Missouri s Motion to Dismiss

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Adams, in her Official capacity as Chairman of the Moore BOE, Carolyn M. McDermott, in her Official capacity as Secretary of the Moore BOE; William R.

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 97-5 Filed 11/28/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv PAG Document 15 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants. General of the State of California, hereby alleges as follows:

Case 2:06-cv SOW Document 1 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 24

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document Filed 01/17/14 Page 1 of 8. Exhibit C

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. 1. This is a class action suit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C by individuals

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH UTCR CONFERRAL STATEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

INDIVIDUAL, COLLECTIVE, AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv EGS Document 18 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ALL MATTERS. Name of Professionals Year Admitted Hours Rates Total

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 9:13-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2013 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv BRM-DEA Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF RAMSEY. Case Type: Civil/Other. Andrew Cilek and Minnesota Voters Alliance,

CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 53 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW and DIONNE O NEAL, v. Plaintiffs, DEBORAH E. SCOTT in her official capacity as Director of Missouri Department of Social Services, JANEL R. LUCK, in her official capacity as Director of Family Support Division, Missouri Department of Social Services, KANSAS CITY BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS and MELODIE A. POWELL, JOSEPH D. SERRANO, CYNTHIA THOMPSON, QUENTIN JENNINGS, SHAWN L. KIEFFER, and SHELLEY MCTHOMAS in their official capacities as members of the Kansas City Board of Election Commissioners, JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS and TAMMY L. BROWN, WILLIAM J. BAKER, MICHAEL K. WHITEHEAD, CHARLES E. DUMSKY, CHARLENE DAVIS, and ROBERT C. NICHOLS, JR. in their official capacities as members of the Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners, ST. LOUIS CITY BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS and SCOTT LEIENDECKER, MARY WHEELER-JONES, CAROL A. WILSON, EILEEN M. MCCANN, JACK LARY, and CLARENCE E. DULA in their official capacities as members of the St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. COMPLAINT Courthouse News Service Plaintiffs Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now ( ACORN ) and Dionne O Neal, through their undersigned counsel, for their Complaint against Defendants Deborah E. Scott, Director of Missouri Department of Social Services, Janel R. Luck, Director of Family Support Division, Missouri Department of Social Services,

Kansas City Board of Election Commissioners and its members Melodie A. Powell, Joseph D. Serrano, Cynthia Thompson, Quentin Jennings, Shawn L. Kieffer, and Shelley McThomas, Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners and its members Tammy L. Brown, William J. Baker, Michael K. Whitehead, Charles E. Dumsky, Charlene Davis, and Robert C. Nichols, Jr., St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners and Scott Leiendecker, Mary Wheeler-Jones, Carol A. Wilson, Eileen M. McCann, Jack Lary, and Clarence E. Dula, all sued herein in their official capacities, allege upon knowledge as to their own conduct and information and belief as to the conduct of others. Introduction 1. This action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to redress past and ongoing violations of the obligations imposed by Section 7 of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (the NVRA ), 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-5, for voter registration by public assistance agencies in Missouri. 2. Section 7 of the NVRA mandates that all offices in a state that provide public assistance must distribute voter registration application forms, assist applicants in completing the forms, and accept completed voter registration application forms. 3. Section 7 further requires all public assistance offices to distribute voter registration materials with each application, recertification, renewal or change of address relating to an applicant s receipt of public assistance. 4. Pursuant to the federal law, the public assistance agencies must also inquire of every applicant, in writing, whether he or she would like to register to vote or change his or her voter registration address and advise every applicant in writing that the 2

decision whether to register to vote will not affect the applicant s eligibility for benefits or the amount of benefits available. 5. The requirements of Section 7 reflect Congress s objective to increase the number of eligible citizens who register to vote in federal elections, and to ensure the registration of the poor and persons with disabilities who do not have driver s licenses and will not come into contact with the other principal place to register under this Act [motor vehicle agencies]. 42 U.S.C. 1973gg (b) (1); NVRA Conference Report (H.Rept. 103-66). 6. Despite these clear obligations under the NVRA, Missouri s public assistance offices routinely fail to provide the required voter registration opportunities to persons seeking public assistance or engaging in other covered transactions, leaving thousands of low-income citizens in Missouri, including the individual Plaintiff, and ACORN members, unregistered and effectively deprived of a voice in government. 7. Defendants are state and local officials responsible for Missouri s compliance under Section 7 of the NVRA. They have failed to fulfill their federallyrequired responsibilities for coordinating and implementing voter registration opportunities for individuals seeking services through offices of the Department of Social Services ( DSS ) which is a public assistance agency as defined by Section 7 of the NVRA. 8. As the result of these ongoing violations, Plaintiff O Neal, and numerous ACORN members have been denied the opportunity to register to vote, thereby depriving them of exercising their rights to vote and of a voice in government. 3

9. As the result of these ongoing violations, Plaintiff ACORN and its members have been forced to devote a significant portion of their limited time and resources to conducting voter registration outreach to the clients of Missouri s public assistance agencies. But for the conduct of the Defendants and their violation of the NVRA, Plaintiff ACORN and its members would not have spent these resources conducting these particular voter registration activities. 10. Defendants violations thus have hampered and impeded ACORN s mission and have diverted resources needed for full achievement of its goals. More than 100,000 eligible low-income voters in Missouri remain unregistered and effectively disenfranchised as the result of the Defendants actions and inactions. In fact, analysis of data collected by the U.S. Census indicates that more than 250,000 adult citizens in households making less than $25,000 a year in Missouri were unregistered in November 2006. Parties 11. Plaintiff ACORN is a not-for-profit organization, incorporated in Arkansas with Missouri-based offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. ACORN is the nation s largest community organization of low and moderate-income families, working together for social justice and stronger communities. Since 1970, ACORN has grown to more than 175,000 member families, organized in 850 member chapters in 75 cities across the United States and other countries, including more than 13,396 members in its two Missouri chapters. ACORN members participate in local meetings, actively work on public policy campaigns, and elect their own leaders from their neighborhoods. ACORN s membership includes persons who are eligible for public assistance and 4

eligible to vote but are unregistered or need to update their registrations because they have moved. 12. Plaintiff O Neal is a St. Louis resident, who currently is receiving public assistance benefits in the form of Food Stamps and has been eligible for these benefits since 1993. She meets all of the qualifications to register, but is not registered to vote where she currently resides. Plaintiff O Neal is an ACORN member. 13. Defendant Scott, the Director of Missouri s Department of Social Services ( DSS ), is sued in her official capacity. DSS is the state agency responsible for administration of many public assistance programs in Missouri covered by the NVRA, including Food Stamps, Medicaid, MO HealthNet and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ( TANF ). 14. Defendant Luck, the Director of the Family Support Division ( FSD ) of the Missouri DSS, is sued in her official capacity. FSD administers the three local federal assistance programs - Food Stamps, Medicaid, and TANF through offices located in each county and the city of St. Louis. Defendant Luck, its Director, is the chief administrative officer whose duty is to personally investigate the conduct of the various bureaus of FSD and to control the administration of the federal assistance programs in offices throughout the state. 15. Defendant Kansas City Board of Election Commissioners ( BOE ) is the designated elections authority for the jurisdiction of the city of Kansas City, within Jackson County, Missouri. It is responsible for supervising the registration of voters within its jurisdiction and for directing the activities of all deputy registration officials that it may appoint. Its duties include instructing and directing deputy registration 5

officials, including voter registration agencies under the NVRA, in the performance of their duties, and to supply them with the proper registration forms. It also is required to retain all voter registration records and registration list records for a minimum of two years and to compile data from the records necessary for NVRA compliance. 16. Defendants Melodie A. Powell, Joseph D. Serrano, Cynthia Thompson, and Quentin Jennings are members, and Shawn L. Kieffer and Shelley McThomas are directors, of the Kansas City Board of Election Commissioners. They are being sued herein in their official capacities. 17. Defendant Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners ( BOE ) is the designated elections authority for the jurisdiction of Jackson County outside the city of Kansas City, Missouri. It is responsible for supervising the registration of voters within its jurisdiction and for directing the activities of all deputy registration officials that it may appoint. Its duties include instructing and directing deputy registration officials, including voter registration agencies under the NVRA, in the performance of their duties, and to supply them with the proper registration forms. It also is required to retain all voter registration records and registration list records for a minimum of two years and to compile data from the records necessary for NVRA compliance. 18. Defendants Tammy L. Brown, William J. Baker, Michael K. Whitehead, and Charles E. Dumsky are members, and Charlene Davis, and Robert C. Nichols, Jr. are directors, of the Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners. They are being sued herein in their official capacities. 19. Defendant St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners ( BOE ) is the designated elections authority for the jurisdiction of the city of St. Louis, Missouri. It 6

is responsible for supervising the registration of voters within its jurisdiction and for directing the activities of all deputy registration officials that it may appoint. Its duties include instructing and directing deputy registration officials, including voter registration agencies under the NVRA, in the performance of their duties, and to supply them with the proper registration forms. It also is required to retain all voter registration records and registration list records for a minimum of two years and to compile data from the records necessary for NVRA compliance. 20. Defendants Scott Leiendecker and Mary Wheeler-Jones are directors, and Carol A. Wilson, Eileen M. McCann, Jack Lary, and Clarence E. Dula are members of the St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners. They are being sued herein in their official capacities. Jurisdiction and Venue 21. This case arises under the NVRA, a law of the United States. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 28 U.S.C. 1343(a). 22. This Court has jurisdiction to grant both declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-9(B)(2), 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202. 23. This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants because each is a citizen of the State of Missouri. 24. Venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this district. 7

Factual Allegations National Voter Registration Act of 1993 25. The NVRA, 42 U.S.C. 1973gg et seq., has the purpose of establish[ing] procedures that will increase the number of eligible citizens who register to vote in elections for Federal office. 26. In furtherance of that goal, the NVRA mandates that each state shall designate as voter registration agencies -- (A) all offices in the state that provide public assistance. 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-5. The DSS is such a mandatory voter registration agency. 27. The NVRA requires that the following services shall be made available at every public assistance agency: (i) (ii) Distribution of mail voter registration application forms; Assistance to applicants in completing voter registration application forms, unless the applicant refuses such assistance; and (iii) Acceptance of completed voter registration application forms for transmittal to the appropriate State election official. 42 U.S.C 1973gg-5. 28. The NVRA also requires that a voter registration agency that provides public assistance services distribute with each application for service, and with each renewal or change of address form, a mail-in voter registration application form. Each such voter registration agency must also provide a form for clients to complete, asking whether he or she would like to register to vote and advising that the decision whether to 8

register will not affect the amount of benefits available to the applicant. 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-5 (a) (6) (B) (i), (ii). Missouri s Failure to Offer Voter Registration to Public Assistance Clients 29. DSS, through a subunit, the Family Support Division ( FSD ), is responsible for administering several public assistance programs that must comply with Section 7 of the NVRA, including federal Food Stamps, Medicaid, rehabilitation programs for the blind, MO HealthNet and the TANF income assistance program. 30. DSS, through the FSD, administers its programs through offices located in each county and the City of St. Louis. DSS responsibility and authority is centralized in the Director. Employees of DSS offices are state employees subject to the supervision and control of the Director of DSS, Defendant Scott, and/or her agents, including without limitation, Defendant Luck. 31. In recent years Missouri s DSS offices have failed, and continue to fail, to provide the voter registration opportunities mandated by Section 7. 32. The following table accurately indicates the number of voter registration applications processed by public assistance agencies, DSS and Department of Health and Senior Services ( DHSS ), in Missouri since initial implementation of the NVRA. 1995-1996 1997-1998 1999-2000 2001-2002 2003-2004 2005-2006 DSS and DHSS Voter Registrations 143,135 68,475 51,951 34,923 17,637 15,568 33. The number of voter registrations from these two public assistance agencies has steadily declined despite an overall increase in participation in the Food Stamps Program, one of the most widely used public assistance programs covered by the 9

NVRA, between 1995 and 2006. In contrast, the number of voter registrations from the Department of Motor Vehicles has remained relatively constant during that same period. 34. As reported by the DSS, the average monthly number of households receiving Food Stamps through applications at the DSS has increased from 238,699 households in FY1995 to 300,498 households in FY 2006. 35. In 2005-2006, as reported by the Missouri Secretary of State ( SOS ), the total number of voter registrations received from public assistance agencies in all of Jackson County, including those areas that are part of Kansas City was only 364 (Jackson County BOE received 256 and the Kansas City BOE received 108), an average of 15 voter registrations per month. 36. DSS reported an average of 56,078 applications for Food Stamps received by the DSS each month in Missouri in fiscal years 2005 and 2006. In Jackson County, the DSS reported having received an average of 7,575 applications for Food Stamps each month in fiscal years 2005 and 2006. 37. Thus, in fiscal years 2005 and 2006 the DSS received more than 1.3 million Food Stamps applications state wide and 181,800 Food Stamps applications in Jackson County. 38. In fiscal years 2005 and 2006, the DSS reported an average of 8,332 Food Stamps applications received per month in St. Louis City. 39. In 2005 and 2006, as reported by the SOS, the St. Louis City BOE received 2,776 voter registrations, an average of 116 per month. 40. Plaintiff O Neal has received public assistance in the form of Food Stamps since 1993, and in connection therewith, has visited the DSS offices at Prince Hall 10

Family, 4411 N. Newstead Avenue in St. Louis every six months to recertify or renew her benefits. 41. Plaintiff O Neal last visited the above-referenced DSS offices to recertify for public assistance benefits in spring of 2007. On that occasion, and at each of her prior visits to that office, no one from the DSS asked if she was registered to vote or if she wanted to apply to register to vote; she was not given any document that asked if she was registered to vote, whether she needed to update her voter registration for her current address, or whether she would like to apply to register to vote at the DSS office that day. On that occasion and each prior occasion, neither the DSS employee who assisted her nor any other DSS employee offered to give her a voter registration application. 42. Plaintiff O Neal is not registered to vote at her current address, and would like to register at her current address. She meets all of the qualifications to register and would like to register to vote. 43. Within the past year ACORN staff have conducted numerous interviews of clients exiting Missouri DSS offices at offices in four of the largest counties or cities in Missouri: Jackson and Clay (Kansas City), St. Louis City and St. Louis County. Almost none of the clients conducting transactions that triggered the NVRA's voter registration requirements reported being offered the opportunity to register to vote. Three of the DSS offices visited did not even have voter registration applications available on site. 44. On August 23, 2007, counsel for Plaintiff ACORN sent a letter to Defendant Scott, in her official capacity as Director of DSS, providing written notice of the NVRA violation. In compliance with the notice requirements set forth at 42 U.S.C. sec. 1973gg-9, Plaintiffs provided a copy of this letter to Missouri's chief elections 11

officer. The letter stated that in the absence of a plan to remedy DSS s failures to implement the NVRA, ACORN would have no choice but to commence litigation. Copies of the August 23 letter to Defendant Scott and the letter transmitting a copy to the Secretary of State, Missouri s chief elections officer, are annexed hereto as Exhibit A. In an October 11, 2007 letter, Defendant Scott acknowledged receipt of the August 23 letter. A copy of Defendant Scott s October 11, 2007 letter is annexed hereto as Exhibit B. 45. Notwithstanding the repeated attempts to secure Defendants compliance with Section 7 of the NVRA, persons applying for public assistance in Missouri, including the individual Plaintiff as well as ACORN members who receive public assistance, are not being offered the opportunity to register to vote that federal law requires. 46. Defendants are responsible for assuring public assistance agency compliance with Section 7 of the NVRA within their respective jurisdictions. 47. Defendants have failed to carry out their responsibilities to prevent and correct the violations described in this complaint. How Defendants Lack of Compliance Impacts ACORN s Voter Registration Efforts 48. As a means of building stronger communities, ACORN has been a strong advocate for voter participation. More registered voters in a community served by ACORN means that ACORN can encourage more people to vote on Election Day and generate a higher amount of voters, all of which strengthens the community. Members of ACORN who are registered to vote have an interest in other members of their community being registered to vote. Although ACORN encourages its members to register to vote, not all of its members are registered. As members of an organization devoted to 12

organizing low and moderate-income families, many of ACORN s members receive public assistance and would benefit from being offered the opportunity to register to vote during visits to DSS offices to apply and/or recertify their eligibility for public assistance. 49. Low income families in general tend to change their residences more frequently than wealthier families. ACORN has members who have applied for public assistance and were not registered to vote or who have moved since registering to vote and have not updated their voter registration addresses, but who would update their voter registration address at DSS offices if given that opportunity. ACORN has had to expend funds to register members who were not offered the opportunity to register when they went to DSS offices. 50. ACORN seeks to increase political participation in the communities it serves. As part of those efforts ACORN regularly conducts voter registration drives in St Louis Metro Area, Kansas City, and Springfield, Missouri. As the result of Defendants ongoing violation of the NVRA, Plaintiff ACORN and its members have been forced to devote a significant portion of their limited time and resources to conducting voter registration outreach to the clients of Missouri public assistance agencies who should be offered the opportunity to register by DSS offices. Those voter registration efforts specifically include, among other things, collecting voter registration applications outside of DSS offices from individuals who were not offered the opportunity to register to vote or to update their voter registration information during visits to the offices. 51. ACORN has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on voter registration activities in the state of Missouri. ACORN employees or volunteers have participated in voter registration efforts outside of public assistance agencies because Defendants have 13

failed to provide the required voter registration opportunities. ACORN would not have spent time, money and resources attempting to register to vote individuals leaving DSS offices had those offices offered the individuals applying or recertifying their eligibility for benefits the opportunity to register to vote or update their voter registration information during their visits to the DSS offices. 52. Defendants violations thus have hampered and impeded ACORN s mission, required ACORN to expend resources it would not otherwise have expended, and diverted resources needed for community organization, issues campaigns, and other programs for full achievement of its goals. 53. As the result of Defendants ongoing violation of the NVRA, Plaintiff ACORN s members who apply or recertify eligibility for public assistance benefits are not being advised that they are able to register to vote at that time. Consequently, Defendants are not providing ACORN members the opportunity to register to vote as required by Section 7 of the NVRA, thus depriving them of exercising their rights to vote and of a voice in government. Claim for Relief (Violation of Section 7 of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993) 54. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. 55. Because of the failure to provide the voter information and registration opportunities and assistance required by Section 7 of the NVRA, the Defendants have violated and continue to violate the NVRA. 14

56. Plaintiffs have been aggrieved by this violation of the NVRA and have no adequate remedy at law for the Defendants violation of their rights. Declaratory and injunctive relief is required to remedy the Defendants violations of the NVRA and to secure ongoing compliance with the NVRA. Prayer for Relief WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court enter an Order: (i) Declaring, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-9(B)(2), that the Defendants have violated Section 7 of the NVRA, 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-5, by failing to provide voter registration services as required by the NVRA at agencies that provide public assistance, including the Missouri Department of Social Services; (ii) preliminarily and permanently enjoining the Defendants, their agents and successors in office and all persons working in concert with them pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-9(B)(2), from implementing practices and procedures that violate Section 7 of the NVRA, 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-5; (iii) directing the Defendants, under a court-approved plan with appropriate reporting and monitoring requirements, to take all appropriate measures necessary to remedy the harm caused by their non-compliance with Section 7 of the NVRA, including, without limitation, ensuring that individuals affected by the Defendants non-compliance with Section 7 of the NVRA are provided immediate opportunities to register to vote or change their voter registration addresses; (iv) directing the Defendants, under a court-approved plan with appropriate reporting and monitoring requirements, to take all steps necessary to ensure 15

ongoing compliance with the requirements of Section 7 of the NVRA, 42 U.S.C. 1973 gg-5, including, without limitation, training and monitoring personnel to ensure that designated agencies are making voter registration materials available, inquiring of all applicants, in writing, whether they would like to register to vote or change their voter registration addresses, assisting applicants in completing the voter registration applications, and providing other voter registration services and assistance as required by the NVRA; (v) awarding the Plaintiffs the cost and disbursements incurred in connection with this action, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-9(c). (vi) retaining jurisdiction over this action to ensure that the Defendants are complying with their obligations under the NVRA; and (vii) awarding such other equitable and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: April 23, 2008 ARTHUR BENSON & ASSOCIATES By: Arthur A. Benson II Mo. Bar #21107 Jamie Kathryn Lansford Mo. Bar #31133 4006 Central Avenue (Courier Zip: 64111) P.O. Box 119007 Kansas City, Missouri 64171-9007 Telephone: (816) 531-6565 Telefax: (816) 531-6688 Email: abenson@bensonlaw.com 16

Email: jlansford@bensonlaw.com DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP John M. Nonna Richard J. Cairns 1301 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 259-8000 Telefax: (212) 259-6333 Email: jnonna@dl.com Email: rcairns@dl.com PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW Jon Greenbaum Bob Kengle Carlean Ponder 1401 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 662-8315 Telefax: (202) 628-2858 Email: jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org Email: bkengle@lawyerscommittee.org Email: cponder@lawyerscommittee.org PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED DEMOS: A NETWORK OF IDEAS & ACTION Brenda Wright 358 Chestnut Hill Avenue Suite 303 Brighton, MA 02135 Telephone: (617) 232-5885 ext. 13 Telefax: (617) 232-7251 bwright@demos.org Allegra Chapman 220 Fifth Avenue, 5th Floor New York, NY 10001 Telephone: (212) 419-8772 Telefax: (212) 633-2015 achapman@demos.org 17

PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED PROJECT VOTE Brian Mellor Teresa James 196 Adams Street Dorchester MA 02122 Telephone: (617) 282-3666 Telefax: (617) 507-6402 Email: electioncounsel1@projectvote.org] Email: electioncounsel2@projectvote.org] PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 18