Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
|
|
- Phillip Warner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CELIA VALDEZ GRACIELA GRAJEDA, ) ROANNA BEGAY, JESSE RODRIGUEZ, ) and COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR ) REFORM NOW ) ) Plaintiffs, v. ) ) MARY HERRERA, in her official capacity as ) New Mexico Secretary of State, PAMELA S. ) HYDE in her official capacity as Secretary of ) New Mexico Human Services Department, ) FRED SANDOVAL in his official capacity as ) The Director of the Income Support Division ) of the New Mexico Human Services Department, ) CAROLYN INGRAM, in her official capacity ) As the Director of the Medical Assistance Division ) of the New Mexico Human Services Department, ) RICK HOMANS, in his capacity as the Secretary ) of the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue ) Department, and MICHAEL SANDOVAL, in his ) official capacity as the Director of the Motor ) Vehicle Division of the New Mexico Taxation ) and Revenue Department, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Civil Action No: 1:09-cv LAM/DJS ) PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Defendant Mary Herrera hereby serves her Responses to Plaintiffs First Set of Requests for Admission as required by Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant reserves the right to supplement these responses should such supplementation become necessary. Interrogatory No. 1: Describe the organizational structure of the New Mexico Secretary of State s Office showing the direct and indirect reporting responsibilities by position title from office personnel up through and including the position of Secretary of State, and all positions within the Bureau of Elections, and describe any changes in the organizational structure since January 1, 2000, including but not PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 1 of 10
2 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 2 of 10 limited to, any changes relating to who/which position is responsible for coordinating and administering the Secretary of State s responsibilities under the NVRA. calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Specifically, Defendant objects to the cumbersome disclosure of the entire organizational structure of the Secretary of State s Office. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that the individuals within the Secretary of State s Office responsible for administering the Office s responsibilities under the NVRA include: (1) Mary Herrera, Secretary of State. (2) Don Francisco Trujillo, Deputy Secretary of State. Mr. Trujillo reports directly to the Secretary of State. (3) A.J. Salazar, Director, Bureau of Elections. Mr. Salazar reports both to Mr. Trujillo and to the Secretary of State. (4) Kelli Fungenzi, Administrator, Bureau of Elections. Ms. Fulgenzi reports directly to Mr. Trujillo. (5) Larry Dominguez, Elections Coordinator. Mr. Dominguez reports directly to Ms. Fulgenzi. (6) Manuel Vildasol, Administrator. Mr. Vildasol reports directly to Mr. Tujillo. From 2000 to 2006, Rebecca Vigil-Giron was the Secretary of State of New Mexico. During the same time period, Liz Perry was the Deputy Secretary of State. From 2000 to 2003, Hoyt Clifton was the Director of the Bureau of Elections. From 2003 to 2004 and again from 2005 to 2006, Denise Lamb was the Director of the Bureau of Elections. From 2004 to 2005, Ernie Marquez was the Director of the Bureau of Elections. From 2006 to 2007, Daniel A. Ivey-Soto was the Director of the Bureau of Elections. In 2008, after the position was open for approximately six months, Gerald Gonzales was the Director of the Bureau of Elections. Mr. Salazar has held the position since April 2009, after another opening in the position of approximately six months. Interrogatory No. 2: Identify each individual who has held a position of authority with respect to voter registration at the Secretary of State s Office since January 1, 2000 (including, but not limited to, the Secretary of State), and identify each additional individual who is or was a representative, employee, or agent of the Secretary of State who has had supervisory or management responsibility for developing, preparing, approving, implementing, conducting training on, or conducting any review or analysis of any policy, requirement, practice, procedure, directive, guideline, or instruction relating to New Mexico s responsibilities under the NVRA since January 1, 2000 (including the individual responsible for drafting the portion of the State s response to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission s Election Administration and Voting Survey that relates to voter registration at HSD, MVD, and MVD Express), describing the nature and scope of that responsibility and identifying the time period during which each individual had that responsibility. PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 2 of 10
3 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 3 of 10 objection, Defendant refers Plaintiffs to the Objections and Answer to Interrogatory No. 1. Defendant further states that the individual responsible for drafting the portion of the State s response to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission s Election Administration and Voting Survey that relates to voter registration at HSD, MVD, and MVD Express was Larry Dominguez. Interrogatory No. 3: Describe the duties and responsibilities of the Secretary of State to implement, administer, coordinate, oversee, and assure New Mexico s compliance with the requirements of the NVRA since January 1, As the chief election official in New Mexico, the Secretary of State is responsible for overseeing overall compliance with the NVRA. The Secretary of State does not administer any MVD or HSD programs. Accordingly, both MVD and HSD are individually responsible for ensuring compliance with Sections 5 and 7, respectively, of the NVRA. The Secretary of State s role is more that of an ombudsman. The Secretary of State also provides training to other State agencies upon request regarding the NVRA and NVRA compliance. Interrogatory No. 4: Describe all the Secretary of State s policies, requirements, practices, procedures, directives, guidelines, and instructions since January 1, 2000 for implementing, administering, coordinating, overseeing, evaluating, auditing, studying, conducting training on, and assuring compliance with New Mexico s responsibilities under the NVRA, and identify all documents that concern such policies, requirements, practices, procedures, directives, guidelines, and instructions. objection, Defendant states that there are no formal policies regarding NVRA compliance, and that Defendant responds to NVRA-related issues and questions as they arise. Defendant also provides training materials, including manuals and posters, to the relevant state agencies. Interrogatory No. 5: Describe in detail all instructions given to New Mexico County Clerks since January 1, 2000 relating to compliance with the NVRA, including but not limited to instructions on monitoring inventory of voter registration application forms and instructions on distribution of such forms to HSD, MVD, and MVD Express offices. PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 3 of 10
4 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 4 of 10 objection, Defendant states that the training materials identified in the Answer to Interrogatory No. 5 contain most of the instructions provided to the County Clerks. Defendant does not provide instruction regarding the distribution of voter registration forms other than to make clear that such forms must be made available at the relevant agencies. Interrogatory No. 6: Describe in detail a) what voter registration materials, including all voter registration application forms, notice forms, posters, signs, instructions, policies, and any documents or templates created for the purpose of tracking voter registration data at HSD and MVD offices have been distributed by the Secretary of State or a County Clerk to the HSD, ISD, MAD, MVD, and MVD Express since January 1, 2000; and b) how and when these materials have been distributed since January 1, 2000 including a description of the process by which the Secretary of State s office and any County Clerk determines how many voter registration application forms, notice forms, and other materials are needed by each HSD, ISD, MAD, MVD, and MVD Express office to comply with the NVRA. calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to subparts (a) and (b) of this interrogatory as discrete subparts and will count them accordingly as separate interrogatories. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that each agency is responsible for tracking its own voter registration and provides that data to Defendant at the end of every calendar year. Interrogatory No. 7: Identify separately and by year the number of voter registration application forms and voter notice forms distributed by the Secretary of State s Office to the HSD, ISD, MAD, MVD, and MVD Express from January 1, 1995 to the present. calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to the relevancy of the time frame established by this interrogatory. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that she does not have sufficient information to answer this interrogatory. Interrogatory No. 8: To the extent that the Secretary of State has entered into or implemented any agreement, written or otherwise, since January 1, 2000 with any other governmental or non-governmental entity, PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 4 of 10
5 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 5 of 10 including but not limited to any New Mexico County Clerk, to offer voter registration services required under the NVRA to HSD, MVD, or MVD Express clients (including but not limited to offering any third-party voter registration drive), train or otherwise supervise HSD, MVD, or MVD Express staff in their duties required by the NVRA, or distribute voter registration materials to HSD, MVD, and MVD Express offices, describe the nature and terms of the agreement(s), the inception date and duration of the agreement(s), and the parties to the agreement(s). calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to this interrogatory to the extent it requests information protected by any applicable evidentiary privilege, including but not limited to the attorney-client and executive privileges. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that no such written agreements exist. Interrogatory No. 9: Identify and describe in detail every action taken by the Secretary of State to make sure that the State of New Mexico has been in compliance with the requirements of the NVRA since January 1, 2000, including every action taken to make sure that the HSD, ISD, MAD, MVD, and MVD Express are in compliance with the requirements of the NVRA. Defendant states that she has updated and distributed manuals to all relevant state agencies regarding NVRA compliance and has promulgated rules to guide those agencies in their compliance with the NVRA. Interrogatory No. 10: Identify and describe all reports, reviews, evaluations, audits, studies, other forms of analysis, and data compilations concerning compliance by HSD, MVD, and MVD Express offices with the requirements of the NVRA, since January 1, calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to the relevancy of the time frame established by this interrogatory. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that each relevant agency produces a report at the end of each calendar year containing statistics regarding their voter registration activities. Interrogatory No. 11: Do you contend each HSD office has, since January 1, 2000, distributed a voter notice form to clients with each application for benefits, recertification/renewal, and change of address, and if so, identify all facts that support your contention. If you do not so contend, identify each HSD office that failed to distribute voter notice forms in this manner, the time period during which PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 5 of 10
6 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 6 of 10 each office did not so distribute the forms, the actions taken by the Secretary of State to investigate and review the noncompliance, and the actions taken by the Secretary of State to remedy the noncompliance. calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to this interrogatory as containing two discrete subparts and will count them accordingly as separate interrogatories. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that she does not have sufficient information to contend that each HSD office has or has not taken the actions described by this interrogatory. Interrogatory No. 12: Do you contend that each HSD office has, since January 1, 2000, distributed a voter registration application to clients with each application for benefits, recertification/renewal, and change of address, provided assistance in completing the application, accepted the completed voter registration application, and transmitted the completed application to the appropriate election official, and if so, identify all facts that support your contention. If you do not so contend, identify each HSD office that has failed to take these actions, the time period during which each office did not so take these actions, the actions taken by the Secretary of State to investigate and review the noncompliance, and the actions taken by the Secretary of State to remedy the concompliance. calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to this interrogatory as containing two discrete subparts and will count them accordingly as separate interrogatories. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that she does not have sufficient information to contend that each HSD office has or has not taken the actions described by this interrogatory. Interrogatory No. 13: Do you contend that each MVD and MVD Express office since January 1, 2000 (a) provides simultaneous voter registration with every initial application and renewal application for a state driver s license and identification card; (b) makes completed voter registration forms or updates available to the appropriate election official; and (c) ensures that every change of address form submitted to MVD or MVD Express has served as notification of change of address for voter registration with respect to elections for Federal offices unless the client indicates otherwise? If so, identify all facts that support your contention. If you do not so contend, identify each MVD and MVD Express office that failed to take these actions, the time period during which each office did not take these actions, the actions taken by the Secretary of State of investigate and review the noncompliance, and the actions taken by the Secretary of State to remedy the noncompliance. PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 6 of 10
7 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 7 of 10 calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to this interrogatory as containing four discrete subparts and will count them accordingly as separate interrogatories. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that she does not have sufficient information to contend that each MVD and MVD Express office has or has not taken the actions described by this interrogatory. Interrogatory No. 14: Describe the document retention policies, practices or procedures of the Secretary of State since January 1, 1995, applicable to documents relating to the implementation, administration, coordination, oversight and compliance with New Mexico s obligations under the NVRA including but not limited to policy statements, guidelines, training materials, completed voter notice and voter registration application forms, and all documents that track the numbers of clients who apply for benefits or state motor vehicle driver s licenses or state identification cards, recertify/renew, and change their address at HSD, MVD, and MVD Express offices, and whether or not each of those clients was offered a voter registration application and, for HSD clients, a voter notice form. Defendant states that the Secretary of State s document retention policy regarding these documents maintains them for twenty-two months in accordance with 42 U.S.C e. Completed voter registration forms are maintained indefinitely. Interrogatory No. 15: State and list separately the number of completed voter registration application forms received by the Secretary of State that originated from an HSD, ISD, MAD, MVD, and MVD Express office or from a client or customer of the HSD, MVD, or MVD Express from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2004 (listed by year and by program or service), and from January 1, 2005 to the present (listed by HSD, MVD, and MVD Express office by month and by program or service). calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to this interrogatory to the extent it would require the creation of a document or data compilation that does not already exist. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Defendant states that she does not have sufficient information to respond to this interrogatory. Interrogatory No. 16: Describe the manner in which the Secretary of State s Office has provided training and/or instructional materials to HSD, ISD, MAD, MVD, and MVD Express personnel since January 1, PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 7 of 10
8 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 8 of regarding their duties and responsibilities under the NVRA, including but not limited to, compliance with the NVRA s voter notice and voter registration requirements, and identify each person who conducted the training or provided the training and/or instructional materials since January 1, 2000, the group of persons who received the training or the instructional materials, the dates on which and the location at which such training or transmittal of materials occurred, and all materials discussed, displayed, or distributed at the training or in the transmittal. objection, Defendant states that she participates in training sessions provided by those agencies at a location chosen by the agencies. The training materials are provided to the agencies both in person and through the mail. Defendant provided MVD materials to Jerome Vialpando and HSD materials to Carol Baca. Interrogatory No. 17: If you contend that one or more types of transactions between HSD, ISD, MAD, MVD, and MVD Express and its clients is exempt from the requirements for the NVRA, identify with particularity: a. Each such type of transaction you contend is exempt from the NVRA; and b. All facts upon which you rely to support such contentions. Defendant makes no contentions regarding whether any HSD, ISD, MAD, MVD, and MVD Express transactions with their clients are or are not exempt from the NVRA. Should Defendant, after serving these Objections and Answers, makes such a contention, Defendant will supplement her Objections and Answers to Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories. Interrogatory No. 20: 1 Identify any complaints received by the Secretary of State since January 1, 2000 concerning voter registration services under the NVRA, and for each complaint, describe the investigation undertaken and its results. objection, Defendant states that the only complaints she has received regarding NVRA voter registration services came from Plaintiffs. 1 Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant Mary Herrera does not contain interrogatories numbered 18 or 19. PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 8 of 10
9 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 9 of 10 Interrogatory No. 21: Identify separately and describe all actions taken by the Secretary of State to investigate the statements in the letter dated June 12, 2007 from Brian Mellor and Brenda Wright that HSD is not in compliance with the NVRA and also those statements in the letter dated March 23, 2009 from Yolanda Sheffield, et al. that HSD, MVD, and MVD Express are not in compliance with the NVRA, including but not limited to all documents reviewed and persons interviewed. Defendant objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected by any applicable evidentiary privilege, including the attorney-client and executive privileges. Subject to and without waiving this objection, Defendant states that the Secretary of State s Office contacted the Secretary of Taxation and Revenue regarding NVRA compliance issues to help evaluate whether MVD was in compliance and, if not, what needed to be done to ensure compliance. Defendant also corresponded with the authors of the letters identified in this interrogatory in an effort to cure any defects with NVRA compliance in New Mexico. Interrogatory No. 22: Describe the results of each action taken by the Secretary of State to investigate the statements in Mr. Mellor s and Ms. Wright s June 12, 2007 letter and Ms. Sheffield s March 23, 2009 letter. Defendant objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected by any applicable evidentiary privilege, including the attorney-client and executive privileges. Subject to and without waiving this objection, Defendant states that her investigation revealed NVRA compliance issues at MVD. Interrogatory No. 23: Identify by title all databases (for purposes of these interrogatories, the term database encompasses databases, reports, programs, and files) containing information accessible by computer, which databases the Secretary of State maintains or has maintained, or to which the Secretary of State has access, which contain any of the following categories of information for persons ( clients ) who have applied for public assistance at or through an HSD office, or for persons who have applied for a state driver s license or state identification card at or through an MVD or MVD Express office since January 1, 1995: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) the name of the client; the HSD, MVD, or MVD Express office that processed each client; the benefit program or service sought by the client; the date of each application; the date of each recertification; the date of each renewal the date of each change of address; PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 9 of 10
10 Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 10 of 10 (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) whether, for HSD clients, a voter notice form was provided at the time of each application, recertification, renewal, and change of address; a breakdown of each voter notice response (yes, no, no response); whether the client received a voter registration application; whether the client received assistance in filling out an application; whether a completed voter registration application or change of address was transmitted to the appropriate election official; the number of voter notice forms ordered and received by each HSD office; the number of voter registration applications ordered and received by each HSD or MVD or MVD Express office; and the receipt of a completed voter registration application or change of address by the appropriate election official. objection, Defendant states that the Power Profile database, a portion of the Voter Registration Election Management System, contains some of the information identified in this interrogatory. DATED: December 2, 2009 Respectfully submitted, GARY K. KING NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL /s/ Scott Fuqua Scott Fuqua Assistant Attorney General New Mexico Attorney General s Office 408 Galisteo Street Santa Fe, NM (505) Telephone (505) Facsimile Attorney for Defendant Mary Herrera CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing on Plaintiffs counsel of record via on December 2, /s/ Scott Fuqua Scott Fuqua PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Page 10 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CELIA VALDEZ, GRACIELA GRAJEDA, ROANNA BEGAY, JESSE RODRIGUEZ, and ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 26-2 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:09-cv-00668-JCH-DJS Document 26-2 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CELIA VALDEZ, GRACIELA GRAJEDA, SHAWNA ALLERS, JESSE RODRIGUEZ,
More informationCase 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 106 Filed 08/27/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO.
Case 1:09-cv-00668-JCH-DJS Document 106 Filed 08/27/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CELIA VALDEZ, GRACIELA GRAJEDA, SHAWNA ALLERS, and JESSE RODRIGUEZ CIVIL
More informationCase 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 84-1 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:09-cv-00668-JCH-DJS Document 84-1 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 15 CELIA VALDEZ, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Plaintiffs, v. MARY HERRERA, et al., CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:09-cv-00668-JCH-DJS Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CELIA VALDEZ, et al., v. Plaintiffs, MARY HERRERA, et al., Defendants. No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:08-cv-00702-JB-WDS Document 100 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES; FEDERATION OF AMERICAN
More informationCase 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 53 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
Case 1:09-cv-00668-JCH-DJS Document 53 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CELIA VALDEZ, et al. v. Plaintiffs, MARY HERRERA, in her official capacity
More informationDocket No. 31,080 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 2008-NMSC-063, 145 N.M. 280, 196 P.3d 1286 November 7, 2008, Filed
1 RUIZ V. VIGIL-GIRON, 2008-NMSC-063, 145 N.M. 280, 196 P.3d 1286 HARRIET RUIZ, ROSEMARIE SANCHEZ and WHITNEY C. BUCHANAN, Appellants, v. REBECCA D. VIGIL-GIRON, Appellee, and MARY HERRERA, in her capacity
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Defendants/Appellants.
Appellate Case: 11-2063 Document: 01018812445 Date Filed: 03/19/2012 Page: 1 CELIA VALDEZ, et al., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Case No. 11-2063 DIANNA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES REVISED PLAN FOR COMPLIANCE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ) ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW ) et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 08-4084-CV-C-NKL )
More informationCase 5:16-cv OLG Document 106 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:16-cv-00257-OLG Document 106 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION JARROD STRINGER, et. al, v. Plaintiffs, ROLANDO PABLOS,
More informationCase 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 375 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:11-cv-00926-JTM-JCW Document 375 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ROY FERRAND, LUTHER SCOTT, JR., and LOUISIANA STATE CONFERENCE OF
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:07-CV-231 PAMELA L. HENSLEY, Plaintiff, MOTION FOR LEAVE v. TO AMEND ANSWER JOHNSTON COUNTY BOARD
More informationCase 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 374 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 9 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:11-cv-00926-JTM-JCW Document 374 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 9 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LOUISIANA STATE CONFERENCE OF CIVIL ACTION NO. 2-11-00926 THE NAACP,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and COALITION FOR THE PEOPLES AGENDA, Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., * Plaintiff * v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH LINDA H. LAMONE, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DEFENDANT
More informationIn the United States District Court For the Northern District of Ohio
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Ohio Carrie Harkless, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Jennifer Brunner, et al., Case No. 1:06-CV-2284 Judge Gaughan Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli
More informationLegalFormsForTexas.Com
Information or instructions: Motion & order to retain case on the docket 1. The following motion is required to prevent the case from being dismissed for lack of prosecution. Courts routinely dismiss cases
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:16-cv-01164-WO-JEP Document 33 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCourthouse News Service
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW and DIONNE O NEAL, v. Plaintiffs, DEBORAH E. SCOTT in her official capacity as Director
More informationShort title. (1969) Statute text Sections through NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Audit Act."
ARTICLE 6 Audit Act Section 12-6-1 Short title. 12-6-2 Definitions. 12-6-3 Annual and special audits; financial examinations. 12-6-3 Annual and special audits; financial examinations. (Effective July 1,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. vs. Ct. App. No. 30,211 District Court No. D-I0I-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO CHRISTOPHER D. BROSIOUS, Petitioner-Appellee, vs. Ct. App. No. 30,211 District Court No. D-I0I-CV-200902560 RICK HOMANS ex rei. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 1:08-cv JB-RHS Document 128 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:08-cv-00702-JB-RHS Document 128 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO x ) AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE ) WITH DISABILITIES, FEDERATION
More informationRESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case 1:08-cv-00702-JB-RHS Document 123 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO x AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, FEDERATION OF WOMEN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ACTION NC, DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, SHERRY DENISE HOLVERSON, ISABEL NAJERA, and
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:15-cv-09300 Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ALDER CROMWELL, and ) CODY KEENER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) KRIS KOBACH,
More informationCase: 3:17-cv GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 217
Case: 3:17-cv-00094-GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 217 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION - FRANKFORT JUDICIAL WATCH,
More informationCity of Midland. Freedom of Information Act. (P.A. 442 of 1976, as amended) Administrative Policy
City of Midland FOIA Policy Page 1 of 4 City of Midland Freedom of Information Act (P.A. 442 of 1976, as amended) Administrative Policy I. Purpose. Public Act 442 of 1976, commonly known as the Freedom
More information1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.
Information or instructions: Request for disclosure 1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure. 2. Either party may file a request upon the other in order to obtain basic
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER (revised November 2018)
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER (revised November 2018) A. PURPOSE The purpose of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (the Committee ) of SSR Mining Inc. (the Company
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity as Chairman of the Texas Democratic Party; HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC
More informationCase 1:06-cv PAG Document 14 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:06-cv-02284-PAG Document 14 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CARRIE HARKLESS, et al., : : CASE NO. 1:06CV2284 Plaintiffs, : :
More informationGARY K. KiNG Attorney General
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO CHRISTOPHER D. BROSIOUS, Petitioner-Appellee, vs. Ct. App. No. 30,21 1 District Court No. D-101-CV-200902560 RICK HOMANS cx rel. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT
More informationOFFICE OF TEMPORARY AND DISABILITY ASSISTANCE SECURITY OVER PERSONAL INFORMATION. Report 2007-S-78 OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER
Thomas P. DiNapoli COMPTROLLER OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER DIVISION OF STATE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY Audit Objectives... 2 Audit Results Summary... 2 Background... 2 Audit Findings and Recommendations...
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMMON CAUSE NEW YORK, as an organization and on behalf of its members; BENJAMIN BUSCHER; SEAN HENNESSEY; REBECCA LIBED; ANDREW
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ) ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM ) NOW, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 08-4084-CV-C-NKL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ) ELECTIONS; PETER S. KOSINSKI ) and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946
Case 4:17-cv-02946 Document 3 Filed in TXSD on 10/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION United States District Court Southern District of Texas
More informationLEGISLATIVE RESEARCH COMMISSION PDF VERSION
CHAPTER 63 PDF p. 1 of 13 CHAPTER 63 (HB 32) AN ACT relating to elections. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: Section 1. KRS 116.025 is amended to read as follows: (1)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:15-cv-00299 Document 2-1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Navajo Nation, Civil Action No. 15-cv-00299
More informationPolicy Title: FOIA Procedures and Guidelines Policy 104 Number:
,) lō. "" ~i~ o:: '-,,,,",, // ~A"C, r~ Administrative Policies and Procedures Policy Title: FOIA Procedures and Guidelines Policy 104 Number: Effective: 7/15 Supersedes: APR #106 (dated 3/99), APP #104
More informationCOUNTY OF SACRAMENTO VOTER REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS. SPECIALIZED SERVICES SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES For Calendar Years 2018 & 2019
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO VOTER REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES For Calendar Years 2018 & 2019 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO VOTER REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS Contents ABOUT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS
ELECTRONICALLY FILED Pulaski County Circuit Court Larry Crane, Circuit/County Clerk 2018-Jul-25 11:46:28 60CV-18-4857 C06D17 : 8 Pages IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MARION HUMPHREY,
More informationCase 3:12-cv Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:12-cv-00044 Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION VOTING FOR AMERICA, PROJECT VOTE, INC., BRAD
More informationAdams, in her Official capacity as Chairman of the Moore BOE, Carolyn M. McDermott, in her Official capacity as Secretary of the Moore BOE; William R.
Case 1:16-cv-01274-LCB-JLW Document 63 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW NORTH CAROLINA STATE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, vs. Case No: 2017- Defendant. / ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE THIS CAUSE is before the Court
More informationPlaintiffs LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS (LULAC), HERLINDA S. GARCIA, JUAN GARCIA, AGUSTIN PINEDA, BERTA URTEAGA,
Case 4:12-cv-03035 Document 20 Filed in TXSD on 02/15/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS (LULAC,
More informationInformation or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW
Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel 1. This motion allows attorneys to substitute on a case. 2. See TRCP 8, which states that the leading counsel shall be
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:06-cv-01891-JTC Document 31 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM
More informationLaw Access New Mexico, Senior Citizens Law Office. Current issues
Law Access New Mexico, Senior Citizens Law Office Current issues Get an ID Driver s license Identification card Birth certificates Correct information Register a birth Get a passport Get a Social Security
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ) ALLIANCE, NUCLEAR WATCH OF NEW ) MEXICO, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE ) COUNCIL, RALPH HUTCHISON, ED SULLIVAN, )
More information2004 Kansas State Plan HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT OF 2002
2004 Kansas State Plan HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT OF 2002 Kansas Secretary of State Ron Thornburgh First Floor, Memorial Hall, 120 S.W. 10th Avenue Topeka, Kansas 66612 785.296.4564 A MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY
More informationMERCER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
No. 626 MERCER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT SECTION: TITLE: ADOPTED: REVISED: FINANCES FEDERAL FISCAL COMPLIANCE 626. FEDERAL FISCAL COMPLIANCE 1. Authority Part 200 The Board shall ensure federal funds received
More informationCase 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00243-RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and ) NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ) ASSOCIATION, ) )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 15-CV-324 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT
Case: 3:15-cv-00324-jdp Document #: 78 Filed: 01/11/16 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ONE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-CV-324
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED APRIL, 0 Sponsored by: Senator BRIAN P. STACK District (Hudson) Senator SANDRA B. CUNNINGHAM District (Hudson) SYNOPSIS Requires Secretary of State
More informationDocument Retention and Archival Policy
Document Retention and Archival Policy December 1, 2015 Document Retention and Archival Policy Page 1 1. Background The Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI ), vide its Notification dated September
More informationrdd Doc 825 Filed 12/11/17 Entered 12/11/17 16:29:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 4
17-22770-rdd Doc 825 Filed 12/11/17 Entered 12/11/17 16:29:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) 21st CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS,
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER
CORPORATE CHARTER Date issued 2005-11-17 Date updated 2016-07-28 Issued and approved by Uni-Select Inc. Board of Directors HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER PART I. COMMITTEE STRUCTURE
More informationRIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
No. 801 SECTION: OPERATIONS RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT TITLE: PUBLIC RECORDS ADOPTED: May 8, 1989 REVISED: December 1, 2008 801. PUBLIC RECORDS 1. Purpose The Board recognizes the importance of public records
More informationGENERAL RETENTION SCHEDULE #23 ELECTIONS RECORDS INTRODUCTION
GENERAL RETENTION SCHEDULE #23 ELECTIONS RECORDS INTRODUCTION Public Records The Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (MCL 15.231-15.246) defines public records as recorded information prepared,
More informationPROCEDURES GUIDE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE D20 TRAFFIC RECORDS VERSION 1.0 FOR
ANSI-D20 PROCEDURES GUIDE VERSION 1.0 FOR AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE D20 TRAFFIC RECORDS 2011 ANSI-D20 Procedures - 2009 Procedures for maintaining and enhancing the ANSI-D20 Traffic Records
More informationAssembly Bill No. 45 Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections
Assembly Bill No. 45 Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to public office; requiring a nongovernmental entity that sends a notice relating to voter registration
More informationUnited States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 6-21-2000 United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico Judge Paul J. Kelly Jr. Follow this
More informationCOMPLIANCE COMMITTEE OF SALLIE MAE BANK CHARTER
Approved: June 21, 2018 PURPOSE COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE OF SALLIE MAE BANK CHARTER The Compliance Committee (the Committee ) has been appointed by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Sallie Mae Bank (the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1891-JTC
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
1 1 1 MICHAEL D. KIMERER, #00 AMY L. NGUYEN, #0 Kimerer & Derrick, P.C. East Indianola Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 01 Telephone: 0/-00 Facsimile: 0/- Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT
More informationCase 6:06-cv RAW Document 73 Filed in USDC ED/OK on 11/03/2009 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:06-cv-00558-RAW Document 73 Filed in USDC ED/OK on 11/03/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ALABAMA-QUASSARTE TRIBAL TOWN, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:18-cv-01841 Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, 120 Broadway
More informationMinnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES
Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES Amended and Effective August 5, 2003 Rule 1. Purpose and Administration a. b. c. The purpose of the Minnesota
More informationbeing preempted by the court's criminal calendar.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF «County» «PlaintiffName», vs. «DefendantName», Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. «CaseNumber» SCHEDULING
More informationAGENCY SPECIFIC RECORD SCHEDULE FOR: Municipal Clerk, Office of
Issued to: Municipal Clerk, Office of Last Revised: 12/12/2017 Vermont State Archives and Records Administration Vermont Office of the Secretary of State AGENCY SPECIFIC RECORD SCHEDULE FOR: Municipal
More informationCase 1:14-cv KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:14-cv-20945-KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9 AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
More informationReferred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing the administration of elections.
S.B. SENATE BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE OPERATIONS AND ELECTIONS (ON BEHALF OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE) PREFILED DECEMBER 0, 0 Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections SUMMARY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-00634-SEB-VSS Document 44 Filed 09/08/2005 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION INDIANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TODD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO CARRIE HARKLESS, TAMECA MARDIS and ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, v. Plaintiffs, JENNIFER BRUNNER, in her official
More informationLegislative Reapportionment Office. Functional Analysis & Records Disposition Authority
Legislative Reapportionment Office Functional Analysis & Records Disposition Authority Presented to the State Records Commission October 23, 2013 Table of Contents Functional and Organizational Analysis
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Advancement Project and : Marian K. Schneider, : Petitioners : : v. : No. 2321 C.D. 2011 : Argued: June 4, 2012 Pennsylvania Department of : Transportation, :
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-00201-HLM Document 131 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION COMMON CAUSE / GEORGIA, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL
More informationCase: 3:17-cv GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 210
Case: 3:17-cv-00094-GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 210 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION - FRANKFORT JUDICIAL WATCH,
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/18/14 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 749-28 Filed in TXSD on 11/18/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION MARC VEASEY, et al, Plaintiffs, VS. CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-00195-TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DIGITAL CHOICE OF TEXAS, LLC V. CIVIL NO. 2:05-CV-195(TJW)
More informationI. ANSWER. COMES NOW Defendant IMPULSE MEDIA GROUP, INC. in the above-captioned
United States of America v. Impulse Media Group Inc Doc. Case :0-cv-0-RSL Document Filed 0//0 Page of HON. ROBERT S. LASNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 UNITED
More informationDEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AND CONTINUING INTERROGATORIES
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA v. Plaintiff,, Case No.: Defendant., DEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AND CONTINUING INTERROGATORIES My name is, and I am the Defendant
More informationAlabama State and Local Government Records Commission. Functional Analysis & Records Disposition Authority
Alabama State and Local Government Records Commission Functional Analysis & Records Disposition Authority Revision Presented to the State Records Commission July 27, 2000 Table of Contents Functional and
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-02-13 PROCEDURES FOR PENALTY ASSESSMENTS AND HEARING TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-02-13-.01 Scope
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 11-C-1128 DECLARATION OF MICHAEL HAAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RUTHELLE FRANK, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 11-C-1128 SCOTT WALKER, ET AL., Defendants. DECLARATION OF MICHAEL HAAS I, Michael
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationCase: 1:69-cv Document #: 3762 Filed: 05/15/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:23784
Case: 1:69-cv-02145 Document #: 3762 Filed: 05/15/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:23784 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL L. SHAKMAN, PAUL M. LURIE,
More informationCOMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY
COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY DATE 200 Plaintiff(s) -against- Index # Defendant(s) Plaintiff is represented
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:16-cv-00452-TCB Document 28 Filed 07/21/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMMON CAUSE and * GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE * OF
More informationDocument Retention and Archival Policy
1. Background The Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI ), vide its Notification dated September 2, 2015, issued the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (Listing
More informationSubscriber Registration Agreement. Signing up is as easy as 1, 2, 3...
Subscriber Registration Agreement You must be a registered user to access certain e-government services through Alabama Interactive. Alabama Interactive, Inc 100 North Union Street Suite 630 Montgomery,
More informationCase 2:17-cv DGC Document 36-1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT A
Case :-cv-0-dgc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 EXHIBIT A Case :-cv-0-dgc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA League of United Latin American
More informationCase 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 225 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ) ) ) )
Case 2:16-cv-02105-JAR-JPO Document 225 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STEVEN WAYNE FISH, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
More informationMUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: To Provide Business Privilege Tax Audit Services for the Municipality of Norristown
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Sonya D. Sanders President Derrick D. Perry, Vice President Heather Lewis, District 2 Valerie Scott Cooper, District 3 Hakim Jones, District 4 Olivia Brady, At Large Crandall O. Jones
More informationSENATE, No. 647 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 0 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator JAMES BEACH District (Burlington and Camden) Senator NILSA CRUZ-PEREZ District (Camden and
More informationCase 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00243-RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and ) NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationv. GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NO. 15-2442-CV RONALD F. A VERY, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS GUADALUPE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Defendant. 25 JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 52C 1
Chapter 52C. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. Article 1. General Provisions. 52C-1-100. Short title. This Chapter may be cited as the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. (1995, c. 538, s. 7(c).)
More information