DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TRIAL SKILLS SECTION March 8, By: Robert L. Tobey Johnston Tobey, P.C.

Similar documents
Ethics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

ETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas. Texas State Bar Ethics Rules HIGHLIGHTS (SELECTED EXCERPTS)

SARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRO BONO LAWYERS Prepared by Attorney Patricia Zeeh Risser LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN

TOP 10 Ethical Traps for Employment Lawyers (and How to Avoid Them)

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

Committee Opinion July 22, 1998 THROUGH A TEMPORARY PLACEMENT SERVICE.

The gist of MRPC 1.9 is that, even after

With regard to this hypothetical scenario, you have asked the following questions:

Components of an Effective Ethical Screen

ETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM. Striving for Excellence

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Index of Subjects. Created by: Neil Savage, JD Legal Publications Editor/Indexer th Ave NE Seattle, WA

OVERVIEW. Common ethical issues. Most common grievances. How to prevent grievances. How to handle grievances. Patricia Cummings

Frequently Asked Questions The Consumer Assistance Program

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. ORB

PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION

ASLA Code of Professional Ethics

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. SUSAN ASHTON, Appellant V. KOONSFULLER, P.C.

REPRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE PARTIES AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Written by: JESS IRWIN

(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or

2018: No. 2 June. Filing: File the amended pages in your Member s Manual as follows:

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

PUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

RULE 1.16: DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION

Professor Sara Anne Hook, M.L.S., M.B.A., J.D AIPLA Spring Meeting, May 14, 2011

INVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

Ethical Issues in Representing or Litigating Against Organizations. Dennis P. Duffy 2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: Defendants. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Selected Model Rules of Professional Conduct Ellen C. Yaroshefsky

ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-430 Issued: January 16, 2010

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT: APPLYING THE DISCIPLINARY RULES TO YOUR PROBATE AND ESTATE PLANNING PRACTICE DON T COME TO MY OFFICE WITH SUING ME ON YOUR MIND

In the past few months, two California decisions have made strong

Rubin v. Enns, 23 S.W.3d 382, 23 S.W.3d 382 (Tex.App. 01/07/2000) [3] 23 S.W.3d 382, 23 S.W.3d 382, 2000.TX <

Eleventh Court of Appeals

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

IMPUTATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD Phone: Fax:

MISCONDUCT. Committee Opinion May 11, 1993

GARY KUZMIN, Appellant

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure

Who Should Care About Legal Conflicts of Interest?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011

THE NEW GRIEVANCE SYSTEM AND HOW TO AVOID IT. BETTY BLACKWELL Chair, Commission for Lawyer Discipline Standing Committee of The State Bar

In-House Ethics: Important Questions. Dorsey & Whitney. Dorsey & Whitney LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Questions: 1. May Lawyer file an affidavit for change of judge against Judge X in Defendant s case?

CASE LAW UPDATE: A SURVEY OF RECENT TEXAS PARTNERSHIP AND LLC CASES

Crossing State Lines -- the Ethics of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice

An Attorney's Acceptance of Assignment of Property as Security for Fee

Internal Investigations: Practical and Ethical Concerns Facing In-House Counsel

People v. Alster. 07PDJ056. March 12, Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Respondent

Legal Ethics Issues for Compliance Officers

California Bar Examination

REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT

Ethics for Municipal Attorneys

INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS. Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP

CLIENT FEE DISPUTE ARBITRATION DOCUMENTS

Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness

June 2005 OSB Bar Bulletin Managing Your Practice Column. As professionals, Oregon lawyers have long had a duty to follow the RPCs

Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law. Janet Savage 1

Rule [1-100(B)] Terminology (Commission s Proposed Rule Adopted on October 21 22, 2016 Clean Version)

BARRATRY RULES IN TEXAS. CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PENALTIES

Emerging Ethical Issues in Renewable Energy Hosted by the Professional Responsibility and Environmental Law and Energy Committees

Texas Fiduciary Litigation Update. David F. Johnson

Current Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions:

D-1-GN PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

IMPACT OF THE NEW OHIO RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ON SOLO/SMALL FIRMS

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE

Based upon these hypothetical facts you present the following questions for determination by the Committee:

SECTION 2 BEFORE FILING SUIT

S17Y0531. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID J. FARNHAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY PRACTICE OF LAW

) No. SB D RICHARD E. CLARK, ) ) No Respondent. ) ) O P I N I O N REVIEW FROM DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

Deposition Do s and Don ts 1 hour

Effective January 1, 2016

ETHICAL DUTIES OF TRIAL COUNSEL TO FORMER CLIENTS AND APPELLATE COUNSEL

ETHICS -- IT'S LEGAL, BUT IS IT RIGHT? A. Applying the State Bar Code of Ethics to Your Case The Lawyer's Code of Professional Responsibility (the

ETHICS AND APPELLATE PRACTICE

BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Attorney Continuing Legal Education

Mandamus: Statutory Requirements and 2017 Case Law

National Association of Professional Background Screeners Member Code of Conduct and Member Procedures for Review of Member Conduct

NYCLA COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS. OPINION No Date Issued: 3/24/08. Topic

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. JOHN MUKORO, Appellant, vs. BRIDGET MYERS, Appellee.

THE NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS. FORMAL OPINION : Issuing a subpoena to a current client

ETHICS FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL

People v. Biddle, 07PDJ024. December 17, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Grafton

Ethics Trivia: Real Life Ethical Issues Facing Corporate Counsel. Rules. Presented by: Anna Berman

Where Should I File My Lawsuit in California? bc-llp.com 1

Transcription:

DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TRIAL SKILLS SECTION March 8, 2013 By: Robert L. Tobey Johnston Tobey, P.C. www.johnstontobey.com

A. Lawyers owe their clients a fiduciary duty. Breach of fiduciary duty involves the integrity and fidelity of an attorney and focuses on whether an attorney obtained an improper benefit from representing the client. 2

Examples subordinating the client s interest to the attorney s, retaining the client s funds, engaging in self dealing, improperly using client confidences, failing to disclose conflicts of interest, or making misrepresentations to achieve these ends. The case law distinguishing legal malpractice for breach of fiduciary duty is muddled. 3

B. The Remedy of Fee Forfeiture Burrows v. Arce, 997 S.W.2d 229 (Tex. 1999). Forfeiture of fees is appropriate without regard to whether the breach of fiduciary duty resulted in damage to the client. It is the agent s disloyalty, not any resulting harm that violates the fiduciary relationship. 4

Factual disputes must be decided by a jury: Whether or when the misconduct complained of occurred. The attorney s mental state at the time. The existence or extent of any harm to the client. 5

The Court determines: Whether the attorney s conduct was a clear and serious breach of duty to his client. Whether any of the attorney s compensation should be forfeited. If so, what amount. 6

C. How to Avoid Conflicts That Give Rise to Malpractice and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims! You owe a duty to each client, so each client should have a separate lawyer! Never ask a client to waive a conflict! Never ignore a conflict! Don t defend your work in Court! 7

D. Engagement Letters Are Essential! Contents of engagement letters. Clearly list all persons and entities to be represented. Clearly define the scope of representation. Define whether hourly rates will change during the course of the representation, how expenses will be handled, the right to withdraw for nonpayment and the use of retainers. 8

E. Multi-client representation letters Attorneys are confronted with multiple individual clients, partnership interests, trusts and other entities. The client should confirm that there are no conflicts. The client will inform you if a conflict occurs. Each client should consent to joint representation. Recommend that each client get a separate lawyer. This letter will be Plaintiff s Exhibit 1, so get it right! 9

F. Other Multi-Client Issues Rule 1.06 the transactional client rule. The lawyer does not represent the parties, but rather represents the transaction, such as the preparation of a partnership agreement. Rule 1.07 the intermediary rule. 10

F. Other Multi-Client Issues (cont) Both Rules 1.06 and 1.07 require strict compliance. Use Draft Rule 1.07 Conflicts Checklist (App. 2). 11

Under certain circumstances a lawyer may be required to inform a non-client that he or she is a non-client and is not being represented. Parker v. Carnahan, 772 S.W. 2d 151 Was the lawyer aware or should the lawyer have been aware that the lawyer s conduct would lead a reasonable person to believe that the reasonable person was being represented by the attorney? 12

Treat clients like guests: You don t just let anybody into your house, so don t take just anyone with money as a client. Think about what could go wrong with the representation. You do that for your clients, so use this same skill in deciding whether or not to represent a client. 13

Greed and desperation make you ignore your instincts. Take cases you should reject. Ask for fees you do not deserve. Ignore conflicts that should stop you cold. 14

Fee Agreements. Multiple client representation letters. Agreements to limit the scope of representation. Offers of settlement from the other side. Recommendations against taking certain actions. Rejecting potential clients statute of limitations. Writings will protect you from the foibles of human memory. 15

Get signed consents. Don t give advice over the phone or at cocktail parties to non-patients. 16

A. Lawyers Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Marshall, 751 S.W.2d 295 A Chinese Wall will not rebut the presumption of shared confidences when an attorney in private practice has actual knowledge of a former client s confidences and he thereafter undertakes employment with a firm representing an adversary of the same client in that same suit. 17

In the matter of: ProEducation International, Inc. 587 F.3d 296 (5 th Cir. 2009). Under both the Texas Rules and the ABA Model Rules, the departing attorney should have an opportunity to demonstrate that he or she did not obtain confidential information regarding the former client. If there is evidence showing that the attorney did not obtain confidential information, the imputed disqualification ends when the attorney leaves the first firm. 18

B. Legal Assistants Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. Marshall, 887 S.W.2d 831 The irrebuttable presumption of shared confidences between lawyer/client and lawyer/firm does not apply to a paralegal. An effective Chinese Wall will protect against a disqualifying conflict. 19

In re: Columbia Valley Healthcare System, LP, 320 S.W. 3d 819 (Tex. 2010) Assistant must be instructed not to perform work on any matter on which he or she worked during prior employment. Firm takes other reasonable steps to ensure that assistant does not work on matters that worked on at prior employment, absent client consent. 20

21

A. The Attorney-Client Privilege Rule 5.03 A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services to the client. 22

MIXON v. STATE, 224 S.W.3d 206 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007) Formation of the attorney-client relationship. 23

B. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION RULE 1.05 Confidential information includes both privileged information and unprivileged client information. Privileged information refers to the information of a client protected by the lawyer-client privilege of Rule 5.03 of the Texas Rules of Evidence Unprivileged client information means all information relating to a client or furnished by the client, other than privileged information, acquired by the lawyer during the course of or by reason of the representation of the client. 24

A lawyer shall not knowingly: Reveal confidential information of a client or a former client to anyone else, other than the client, the client s representatives, or attorneys and employees in the lawyer s law firm. 25

A lawyer shall not knowingly: Use confidential information of a client to the disadvantage of the client unless the client consents after consultation. Use confidential information of a former client to the disadvantage of the former client after the representation is concluded unless the former client consents after consultation or the confidential information has become generally known. 26

When the client consents after consultation. When the lawyer has reason to believe it is necessary to do so in order to comply with a court order, a Texas Disciplinary Rule of Professional Conduct, or other law. 27

To the extent reasonably necessary to enforce a claim or establish a defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client. To establish a defense to a criminal charge, civil claim or disciplinary complaint against the lawyer based upon conduct involving the client or the representation of a client. 28

When the lawyer has reason to believe it is necessary to do so in order to prevent the client from committing a criminal or fraudulent act. To the extent revelation reasonably appears necessary to rectify the consequences of a client s criminal or fraudulent act in the commission of which the lawyer s services had been used. 29

D. Particular Cases IN RE: GEORGE, 28 S.W.3D 511 (TEX. 2000) A client confidence is any secret disclosure by a client to a lawyer. It may be as terrible as an admission of a crime, as delicate as a family secret, as fleeting as an idea. 30

The duty of an attorney to maintain client confidences is superior to society s need to eradicate racial discrimination. Any betrayal of the client s confidences that breached the ethical duties of the attorney places that conduct outside Title VII s antiretaliation protection. We hold as a matter of law the conduct that breaches the ethical duties of the legal profession is unprotected under Title VII. 31

The attorney sought collection of unpaid fees based upon information learned through client confidences, including the fact that the client had lied to the bankruptcy court about whether the client had received rental income. An attorney has the duty to preserve the confidences of the client at every peril to himself and to assert the privilege for the client even after the attorney-client relationship ends. 32

Client A had threatened to harm the attorney and his family if he did not reveal Client B s address. Under this threat, the attorney revealed this information and Client A killed Client B s husband. Protection of the client confidences is so sacred that an attorney cannot reveal them even under the threat of injury to himself or his family. The lawyer was disciplined for having made this disclosure. 33

SEALED PARTY v. SEALED PARTY, 2006 U.S.Dist.Lexis 28392 (S.D. Tex. 2006) Attorney breached his fiduciary duty by disclosing the client s confidential information under Rule 1.05. This duty continues even after attorney-client relationship ends. 34

A lawyer shall not knowingly: Make a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal. Fail to disclose a fact to a tribunal when necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act. In an ex parte proceeding failing to disclose an unprivileged fact which the lawyer reasonably believes should be known by that entity to make an informed decision. 35

Fail to disclose authority to the tribunal known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel. Offer or use evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. 36

If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall make a good faith effort to persuade the client to authorize the lawyer to correct or withdraw the false evidence. If such efforts are unsuccessful, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including disclosure of the true facts. 37

38

Duty Breach Proximate Cause Damages Foreseeability But For 39

Privity Rule Generally only the client can sue the lawyer Assignments of legal malpractice claims are not permitted Zuniga v. Groce Locke & Hebdon Commercial marketing of legal malpractice claims by strangers would demean the legal profession. 40

Damages must be proximately caused by the attorney s breach of the standard of care. Mental anguish damages may be recovered if they were an element of the claim that was lost, but not from mental anguish caused by the attorney s negligence. Douglas v. Delp, 987 S.W.2d 879 (Tex. 1999). Attorneys fees may be recovered to the extent the fees were proximately caused by the defendant attorney s negligence. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. National Development and Research Corporation, 299 S.W.3d 106 (Tex. 2009). 41

Legal malpractice 2 years Breach of fiduciary duty 4 years The Discovery Rule applies Litigation Tolling Rule applies to malpractice committed in the course of the prosecution or defense of a claim that results in litigation and limitations are tolled until the lawsuit is over. The Tolling Rule probably does not apply to transactional malpractice. 42

A lawyer may be sued under the DTPA for unconscionable conduct. Latham v. Castillo 972 S.W. 2d 66 (Tex. 1998). Professional services exclusion advice, opinion or judgment. Professor Alderman argues that this exclusion does not change a claim against a professional under the DTPA. 43

Every lawyer should carry insurance for professional mistakes. Understand the coverage provided Most policies are claims made - claim must be asserted during the term of the policy. Tail coverage covers you for acts done years ago, but asserted only now. Most policies are cannibalizing. 44

Lawyer represented client in her divorce. Lawyer asked client if she would like to have sex. Lawyer and client have an affair, and lawyer bills client for his time while having sex. Lawyer s license suspended for 15 months. 45

Read the rules!!! Do not be a party in the next reported decision!!! 46