Stop Thief! Go Recruiter! How To Stop Competitors From Stealing Your Trade Secrets And Employees, And What You Can Lawfully Poach In California

Similar documents
1. If you have not already done so, please join the conference call.

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

Trade Secrets Overview, Protection, and Litigation January 30, 2015 Mark C. Zebrowski

wwww.foxrothschild.com

Defend Trade Secrets Act: What You Need to Know. May 31, 2016

Preliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes:

Gottschlich & Portune, LLP

Trade Secrets Acts Compared to the UTSA

THE IMPORTANCE OF TRADE SECRET PROTECTION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012

SUBTITLE 12. MARYLAND UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT

Georgia s New Restrictive Covenant Act:

Covenants Not to Compete in Utah: A Useful Tool for Employers

RELIBIT LABS MUTUAL NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

F I L E D Electronically :21:37 PM

MEMORANDUM OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT

Litigation Webinar Series. Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA

Protecting Your Trade Secrets Under the DTSA

Creative and Legal Communities

Trade Secrets. Alternative to Patent Protection. Paul F. Neils Jean C. Edwards. Copyright 2010, Paul F. Neils, Esq. All rights reserved

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

The Uncertain State of Employee Nonsolicitation Clauses in California

BARTKO ZANKEL BUNZEL ALERT!

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.

The Defend Trade Secrets Act: New Rights and Obligations for U.S. Employers

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Satya Narayan, Attorney, Royse Law Firm, Palo Alto, Calif.

PROTECTING COMPANY RESOURCES: Non-competes and confidentiality agreements in employment

United States Court of Appeals

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. NAOMI BOINUS-REEHORST, an individual;

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. This is a breach of contract case. Plaintiff SNS One, Inc. ( SNS One ) employed

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

ATTORNEY-CLIENT MAY 25, 2011 JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ.

LYCOMING LAW ASSOCIATION LUNCH AND LEARN MARCH 15, 2006

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference

Breach of Employment Contract Litigation: Contract Interpretation, Materiality of Breach, Defenses, Damages

! CASENOTE JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ. LAWATYOURFINGERTIPS.COM FILING AN ANSWER FOR A MISSING [OR SUSPENDED OR DEFAULTED] DEFENDANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE NEW RESTRICTIVE COVENANT LAW by Mark G. Burnette

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT. B. Tele-PCS, Inc. desires to have the services of Employee.

INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO.

Top 10 Tips for Responding to Search Warrants: Before, During, and After

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. Argued: October 15, 2014 Opinion Issued: April 30, 2015

Comparing employee non-compete arrangements in Australian and US companies. 23 September Association of Corporate Counsel

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,

1 Daniel L. Balsam 2 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 In Propria Personum SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/16/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/16/2017

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

End User License Agreement

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

WILLIAM E. CORUM. Kansas City, MO office:

Case 3:17-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 58

Public Records Act Requests and Pending Litigation

Hooser v. Superior Court of San Diego County, 84 Cal.App.4th 997, 84 Cal.App.4th 997, 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 341, 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 341 (Cal.App.

CHAPTER 457. (Senate Bill 796) Vehicle Laws Motor Vehicle Accident Reports Access

2.16 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

AVOIDING ROUGH SEAS: AN ETHICAL ATTORNEY S GUIDE TO TECHNOLOGY

Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER

a) You must present acceptable photo identification for admission to the test center.

Defenses And Limits Of Calif. Consumer Protection Laws

Student/Queensland Health Terms of Agreement Information for Students

License Agreement. 1.4 Named User License A Named User License is a license for one (1) Named User to access the Software.

FITSI AUTORIZED TRAINING CENTER AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT GOVERNING USE OF VOHC SEAL. THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of, by and. between the Veterinary Oral Health Council ("VOHC") and ("Company").

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-BG-689. On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility

Public Records Request

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SOUTHWEST JUSTICE CENTER. LYDIA HERNANDEZ, an individual,

Grafton Data Systems, Inc. Craig Moore, et al. No CV-353 ORDER

CORPORATE FARE TERMS & CONDITIONS

PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

Application of Policy. All applicants for general student employment in a security sensitive position.

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SERODUS ASA

Marsh USA, Inc. v Alliant Ins. Servs., Inc NY Slip Op 51555(U) Supreme Court, New York County. Ramos, J.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 19a0011n.06. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

General Terms & Conditions

Restrictive Covenants Among Solicitors In England


You means the associate signing this document and any other person who asserts that associate s rights.

Basic Considerations

Calif. Noncompete Clauses Still Unenforceable

Equity Investment Agreement

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 21

STREETBLAST MEDIA, LLC. PO BOX 176 FAIRDALE, KENTUCKY 40118

2016 Year in Review: Trade Secrets and Non-Compete Laws and Developments

FORMATION BEFORE CONSOLIDATION

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

ELECTRONIC ARTS SOFTWARE END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR ORIGIN APPLICATION AND RELATED SERVICES

Ethics Policy. Administrative Code under Part 3, Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 1.4

PUBLIC RECORDS POLICY OF COVENTRY TOWNSHIP, SUMMIT COUNTY

Policy and Procedure Manual for Homeowners Associations

Darholy Financial Services, LLC

To Be or Not to Be In Severance Agreements

Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Contracts North Carolina

Digest: Schatz v. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble and Mallory LLP

Massachusetts Clean Energy Technology Center

Transcription:

Stop Thief! Go Recruiter! How To Stop Competitors From Stealing Your Trade Secrets And Employees, And What You Can Lawfully Poach In California November 2006 Los Angeles/Orange County Andrew L. Satenberg, Esq. Alison G. Sultan, Esq. Palo Alto John C. Fox, Esq. Jay J. Wang, Esq. 2006 phelps phillips

The Conundrum (1) California employees enjoy free mobility of employment. (2) Employees sometimes take and use their former employer's trade secrets and are often perceived to be doing so (whether correctly or not). (3) Covenants not to compete are largely illegal in California, thus often permitting a departing employee to position himself/herself with a direct market competitor. 1

What is a Trade Secret? - Common Sense Approach "Would I care if this were disclosed to my main competitor?" "Would my main competitor care if this were disclosed to me?" 2

What is a Trade Secret? UTSA Information Economic value Not generally known Not readily ascertainable (by proper means) Treated as secret 3

Technical Information Formulas Plans, Designs or Patterns Processes Methods and Techniques Negative Information Software 4

Business Information Financial Information Cost and Pricing Internal Market Analyses or Forecasts Customer Lists Unannounced Business Relationships Business Opportunities - Acquisitions Marketing or Advertising Plans 5

Personnel Information Key Personnel Compensation Plans Receptivity to Solicitation 6

How Can You Get Into Trouble With Trade Secrets? Acquisition Use Disclosure 7

Wrongful Acquisition of a Trade Secret The Key Questions to Ask: How Did I Get the Information? From Whom Did I Get It? How Did He/She Get It? Does the Person Offering the Information To Me Have the Right to Give It To Me? 8

Wrongful Use of a Trade Secret Use Without Consent of the Owner; and Obtained using improper means; or Obtained in violation of obligation not to disclose; or Obtained by you under agreement or obligation not to use the way you are using; or Obtained by you knowing it was disclosed by accident 9

Wrongful Disclosure of a Trade Secret Disclosure Without Consent of the Owner; and Obtained using improper means and/or; Obtained in violation of obligation not to disclose and/or; Obtained by you under agreement or obligation not to use the way you are using and/or; Obtained by you knowing it was disclosed by accident. 10

Protection of Trade Secrets Trade Secrets Are Fragile and Easily Lost Confidential Information Not Automatically a Trade Secret 11

Major Sources Of Risk Mobility of Labor Force Physical Security R&D "Cowboys" Publishing Information - Journals and Conferences Personal Computers E-mail Company Trash 12

The Covenant Not to Compete Problem California Business and Professions Code 16600 provides: "Except as provided in this chapter, every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void." 13

Statutory Exceptions to B&P 16600 Covenants not to compete are lawful when entered into as part of: The sale of the goodwill of a business; The sale by a shareholder of all his or her shares in a corporation, or a sale by the corporation of all or substantially all of its assets, together with the goodwill; or The dissolution of a partnership, dissociation of a partner from a partnership, or sale or other disposition of a partner s interest in a partnership.* * See Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 16601 and 16602. 14

The Downside to Overreaching Covenants Not to Compete Walia v. Aetna, Inc., 93 Cal.App.4th 1213 (11/12/01) (Rev. granted in Cal. Sup. Ct. 2/27/02) $180,000 Compensatory Damage Award $1,080,000 Punitive Damages (SF) Jury Award 15

What Can You Lawfully Covenant in California Consistent With 16600 (And Not As An Exemption To It)? Competing views: Nothing Everything that involves use of trade secret Targeted customer list? Customer list? Customers former employees pitched? Customers of former company? Former employees? This is what we fight about in the courts 16

What Can You Lawfully Covenant in California Consistent With 16600 (And Not An Exemption To It)? (Cont d.) Areas of seeming Agreement in the California courts Can send announcement letter to former clients (just announcing exit from company; maybe (some courts) allow address as well) Employees may use what is in their heads since most California courts are doubtful about the ability of former employees to compartmentalize and restrict use of information in daily work 17

The Race to the Courthouse The Application Group, Inc. v. The Hunter Group, Inc. 61 Cal.App.4th 881 (1998), review denied, 1998 Cal.LEXIS 2968 (1998) Valid Non-Competition Agreement between Maryland employer and its employee. Employee joins California company does 16600 trump the Maryland Non-Competition Agreement? Comity Analysis: Policies behind 16600 outweigh Maryland employer s right to enforce contractual agreement not to compete. 18

Is There Still a Race to the Courthouse? Advanced Bionics v. Medtronic, 29 Cal.4th 697 (2002) Dueling Injunctions: California first (former employer enjoined) Minnesota second (former employee enjoined) California court may not enjoin the Minnesota action What is a well intentioned California employer to do? Race to the courthouse: First to final judgment may then be used as res judicata in other action 19

Is There Still a Race to the Courthouse? (Cont d.) [p. ] A race to the courthouse often ensues: So, the race is on. Issues: Do you want double litigations? Who pays for new hire s Declaratory Judgment lawsuit? What if the other side moves to transfer and consolidate? How long does it take in each court system to run the court track to final conclusion? 20

Protecting Your Company's Trade Secrets On Terminating Employees: Exit Interviews and Audits Reaffirmation of Confidentiality Agreements Demand Letters Searching Departing Employee's Files, Computer, E-mail Box "Inevitable Disclosure" 21

Protecting Your Company From Trade Secret Liability Have a written policy against possession or use of others' trade secrets Enforce it 22

When Interviewing Potential Employee Resist the impulse to pump for information Explain your trade secret policy Ask about confidentiality and non-competition agreements with prior employers 23

Upon Hiring A New Employee Risk analysis "Woodshed" him/her about bringing nothing from former employers Have signed agreement that new employee has brought nothing Counsel new employee, as necessary, on conduct in leaving former employer Provide assurances to former employer in some cases 24

Once The New Employee Is On Board A second "woodshedding" may be necessary If you "raid" competitor's employees, are you sure you are not relying on human resources trade secrets to do so? "Clean room" may be advisable, in some cases 25

When You Find Another Company's Secrets Among Yours Isolate and contain it Investigate Source of information Extent of contamination Remedial Steps to Consider Discipline or termination of offending employees? Isolate and keep; destroy; or return information? Confession and negotiation with trade secret owner? 26

Remedies for Trade Secret Misappropriation Civil Injunctive Relief Enjoin use of the secrets Compel return of materials and information Damages Compensatory Punitive Attorneys' Fees and Costs Criminal Prosecution? 27

Civil Litigation Reasons to consider Need to protect Send a message Stop others Swift strong action may lead to a negotiated settlement Reasons for caution Cost Generally cannot prevent someone from working for a competitor Risks of cross-complaint 28

Criminal Prosecution Scope of criminal statute is narrower Impact on civil action where civil action also brought Protecting your confidential information is more difficult Victim cannot control scope, timing or conduct of prosecution 29

The Blue Penciling Issue Issue: Whether courts will strike down offending language to enforce appropriate covenants California: Will blue pencil Will not write an agreement not made Will not enforce an agreement putrid with unenforceable covenants 30