ISSUE BRIEF: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context

Similar documents
BRIEFING. International Migration: The UK Compared with other OECD Countries.

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 9 APRIL 2018, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME

The High Cost of Low Educational Performance. Eric A. Hanushek Ludger Woessmann

WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE FINANCIAL ASSETS

INTEGRATION OF IMMIGRANTS INTO THE LABOUR MARKET IN EU AND OECD COUNTRIES

PISA DATA ON STUDENTS WITH AN IMMIGRANT BACKGROUND. Mario Piacentini

Aid spending by Development Assistance Committee donors in 2015

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2013: A Further Decline

OECD Health Data 2009 comparing health statistics across OECD countries

IMPROVING THE EDUCATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION OF IMMIGRANT STUDENTS

Taiwan s Development Strategy for the Next Phase. Dr. San, Gee Vice Chairman Taiwan External Trade Development Council Taiwan

2013 (received) 2015 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency (millions) currency. (millions)

How many students study abroad and where do they go?

ISBN International Migration Outlook Sopemi 2007 Edition OECD Introduction

Widening of Inequality in Japan: Its Implications

PISA 2009 in Hong Kong Result Release Figures and tables accompanying press release article

The educational tracks and integration of immigrants reducing blind spots Planning director Kirsi Kangaspunta

2016 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency (millions) currency. (millions)

QGIS.org - Donations and Sponsorship Analysis 2016

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN AUGUST 2016

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN AUGUST 2015

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN MAY 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN MARCH 2016

Russian Federation. OECD average. Portugal. United States. Estonia. New Zealand. Slovak Republic. Latvia. Poland

2015 (received) 2016 (received) 2017 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency. currency (millions) (millions)

PISA 2015 in Hong Kong Result Release Figures and Appendices Accompanying Press Release

VISA POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 10 APRIL 2019, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME. Development aid drops in 2018, especially to neediest countries

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN SEPTEMBER 2015

2017 Recurrent Discussion on Fundamental

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN DECEMBER 2016

OECD/EU INDICATORS OF IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION: Findings and reflections

Shaping the Future of Transport

CO3.6: Percentage of immigrant children and their educational outcomes

NERO INTEGRATION OF REFUGEES (NORDIC COUNTRIES) Emily Farchy, ELS/IMD

USING, DEVELOPING, AND ACTIVATING THE SKILLS OF IMMIGRANTS AND THEIR CHILDREN

List of Main Imports to the United States

Contributions to UNHCR For Budget Year 2014 As at 31 December 2014

Civil and Political Rights

Migration and Integration

OECD expert meeting hosted by the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research Oslo, Norway 2-3 June 2008 ICTs and Gender Pierre Montagnier

Education Quality and Economic Development

It s Time to Begin An Adult Conversation on PISA. CTF Research and Information December 2013

The Extraordinary Extent of Cultural Consumption in Iceland

Mobility of Rights 1

SKILLS, MOBILITY, AND GROWTH

China s Aid Approaches in the Changing International Aid Architecture

SUMMARY CONTENTS. Volumes IA and IB

BUILDING RESILIENT REGIONS FOR STRONGER ECONOMIES OECD

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN JANUARY 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Equity and Excellence in Education from International Perspectives

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - MARCH 2016 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Q233 Grace Period for Patents

Estimating the foreign-born population on a current basis. Georges Lemaitre and Cécile Thoreau

Extended Findings. Finland. ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer. Question 1: Most Contacted

Upgrading workers skills and competencies: policy strategies

Refugee migration 2: Data analysis

International investment resumes retreat

Is This Time Different? The Opportunities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence

On aid orphans and darlings (Aid Effectiveness in aid allocation by respective donor type)

How does education affect the economy?

Spot on! Identifying and tracking skill needs

Putting the Experience of Chinese Inventors into Context. Richard Miller, Office of Chief Economist May 19, 2015

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3 TOURISM STATISTICS REPORT. September 2010

New Approaches to Measuring the Impacts of STI Policy

IMF research links declining labour share to weakened worker bargaining power. ACTU Economic Briefing Note, August 2018

Mapping physical therapy research

GDP per capita was lowest in the Czech Republic and the Republic of Korea. For more details, see page 3.

ASYLUM IN THE EU Source: Eurostat 4/6/2013, unless otherwise indicated ASYLUM APPLICATIONS IN THE EU27

VISA SERVICES CANADA

Provisional agenda and annotations for the eighth session 1 2

1. Why do third-country audit entities have to register with authorities in Member States?

EDUCATION OUTCOMES EXPENDITURE ON EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL STUDENT ASSESSMENT TERTIARY ATTAINMENT

April aid spending by Development Assistance Committee (DAC) donors in factsheet

Country Number Special Instructions. Please reference if the Direct Access Code does not work.

Global Economic Trends in the Coming Decades 簡錦漢. Kamhon Kan 中研院經濟所. Academia Sinica /18

European patent filings

MINISTERIAL DECLARATION

Gender effects of the crisis on labor market in six European countries

POLICIES AND REGULATIONS FOR MANAGING SKILLED INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION FOR WORK

Making Global Labour Mobility a Catalyst for Development: The contribution of Private Employment Agencies

Markets in higher education

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3 TOURISM STATISTICS REPORT. March 2010

Children, Adolescents, Youth and Migration: Access to Education and the Challenge of Social Cohesion

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Continuous shared learning and improvement of nuclear safety and regulatory organisations through the OECD/NEA

UNHCR Global Resettlement Statistical Report 2014

Settling In 2018 Main Indicators of Immigrant Integration

Rankings: Universities vs. National Higher Education Systems. Benoit Millot

European Patent Office Annual Report 2015 Country profile: Netherlands. Embargoed until: 3 March 2016

IMMIGRATION IN THE EU

Emerging Asian economies lead Global Pay Gap rankings

The Madrid System. Overview and Trends. Mexico March 23-24, David Muls Senior Director Madrid Registry

The Impact of China on the Global Economy

European Union Passport

How do the performance and well-being of students with an immigrant background compare across countries? PISA in Focus #82

Transcription:

Immigration Task Force ISSUE BRIEF: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context JUNE 2013 As a share of total immigrants in 2011, the United States led a 24-nation sample in familybased immigration but ranked 19th in employment-based immigration. In June 2013, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released the International Migration Outlook 2013, which contains standardized statistics on permanent legal immigrants for 23 OECD countries and the Russian Federation. These statistics enable comparisons of how different countries prioritized different immigration categories in 2011. Among the 24 nations, the United States ranked first in total permanent immigration, but ranked 19th in permanent immigration as a share of its total population (0.34 percent). In 2011, the United States was a world leader in immigration for family and humanitarian reasons, but fell near the bottom in employment-based categories. As a percentage of total immigrants, the United States was first among the 24 nations in the world in family-based immigration (64.8 percent), second in humanitarian immigrants (15.9 percent), and 19th in employment-based immigration (6.1 percent). i Relative to its total population, the United States was eighth in family immigration (0.22 percent), ninth in humanitarian immigration (0.05 percent), and 20th in employment-based immigration (0.02 percent). Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 1

Table 1. U.S. immigration categories and ranks among 23 OECD countries plus Russia, 2011 SHARE OF TOTAL POPULATION SHARE OF PERMANENT IMMIGRANTS Category Percent Rank Percent Rank Employment 0.02 20 6.1 19 Family 0.22 8 64.8 1 Accompanying workers 0.02 7 7.0 5 Family (including those accompanying workers) 0.24 7 71.8 1 Humanitarian 0.05 9 15.9 2 Other 0.02 8 6.2 9 Free movements 0.00 (NA) T-19 (NA) 0.0 (NA) T-19 (NA) SHARE OF TOTAL POPULATION NUMBER OF PERMANENT IMMIGRANTS All permanent immigrants 0.34 19 1,061,400 1 Note: internationally standardized statistics may not exactly match national accounts. Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. America s low ranks in employment-based immigration came despite the fact that the United States does not have free-movement migration. Many countries, especially European Union (E.U.) members, have free-movement agreements that eliminate numerical caps and most other restrictions on migration between them. On average, 42.2 percent of 2011 permanent immigration to the 23 OECD countries was from free movements. According to OECD, free-movement migration typically occurs for employment reasons, suggesting that the United States trails even farther behind in employment-based immigration. However, because free movements also occur for other reasons, it would be inappropriate to combine these categories for comparative purposes. Among the 24 nations, Spain was first in employment-based immigration as a share of its total population (0.29 percent), while the Russian Federation led that category when calculated as a percentage of total immigrants (66.2 percent). New Zealand was first in family-based immigration relative to its population (0.37 percent), and Korea came in second behind the United States as a share of immigrants (52.4 percent). New Zealand and the United States maintained their top spots in family-based immigration when people accompanying employment-based immigrants were included. 2 Sweden led the world in both categories of humanitarian immigration (0.13 percent and 17.6 percent). Across the 24 countries, China, Bhutan, and Myanmar were the main countries of origin for humanitarian immigrants. Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 2

Figure 1. Immigration categories as a share of total population, 2011 1.75% 1.50% 1.25% 1.00% 0.75% 0.50% 0.25% 0.00% Employment Family accompanying workers Family Humanitarian Other Free movement Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 3

Figure 2. Immigration categories as a share of total immigrants, 2011 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Employment Family accompanying workers Family Humanitarian Other Free movement The following tables present percentages and rankings for each category included in the International Migration Outlook 2013. Figures on immigrant categories as a percentage of the total population comes directly from the Outlook, and percentages relative to total immigration were calculated. 3 The rankings are not part of the Outlook. Note that percentages are rounded and that OECD s standardized statistics may not exactly match national accounts. The Russian Federation is excluded from OECD averages. Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 4

Table 2. All permanent immigrants, 2011 TOTAL NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS Rank Country Percent Rank Country Number 1 Switzerland 1.61 1 United States 1,061,400 2 Norway 1.22 2 Russian Federation 412,600 3 New Zealand 1.01 3 Spain 349,300 4 Australia 0.97 4 United Kingdom 321,200 5 Sweden 0.76 5 Italy 312,200 6 Spain 0.75 6 Germany 290,800 7 Ireland 0.74 7 Canada 248,700 8 Denmark 0.74 8 Australia 219,500 9 Canada 0.72 9 France 211,300 10 Belgium 0.71 10 Switzerland 124,300 11 Austria 0.69 11 Netherlands 105,600 12 Netherlands 0.63 12 Belgium 76,500 OECD average 0.62 13 Sweden 71,700 13 United Kingdom 0.55 14 Norway 60,300 14 Italy 0.51 15 Japan 59,100 15 European Union 0.49 16 Austria 58,400 16 Finland 0.38 17 Korea 56,900 17 Germany 0.35 18 New Zealand 44,500 18 Portugal 0.35 19 Denmark 41,300 19 United States 0.34 20 Portugal 36,900 20 France 0.33 21 Ireland 33,700 21 Russian Federation 0.29 22 Czech Republic 22,600 22 Korea 0.12 23 Mexico 21,700 23 Japan 0.05 24 Finland 20,400 24 Mexico 0.02 Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 5

Table 3. Employment-based permanent immigrants, 2011 1 Spain 0.29 1 Russian Federation 66.2 2 Australia 0.25 2 Mexico 47.3 3 New Zealand 0.23 3 United Kingdom 39.5 4 United Kingdom 0.22 4 Spain 38.9 5 Russian Federation 0.19 5 Japan 38.0 6 Canada 0.19 6 Italy 33.4 7 Italy 0.17 7 Canada 25.9 8 European Union 0.12 8 Australia 25.6 9 Denmark 0.12 9 European Union 24.0 OECD average 0.09 10 New Zealand 22.9 10 Belgium 0.08 11 Portugal 19.7 11 Norway 0.07 12 Denmark 15.6 12 Portugal 0.07 OECD average 15.0 13 Netherlands 0.07 13 Belgium 11.7 14 Ireland 0.06 14 France 11.4 15 Sweden 0.05 15 Netherlands 10.4 16 France 0.04 16 Germany 9.0 17 Germany 0.03 17 Ireland 7.7 18 Switzerland 0.03 18 Sweden 6.6 19 Finland 0.02 19 United States 6.1 20 United States 0.02 20 Norway 5.8 21 Japan 0.02 21 Finland 5.6 22 Austria 0.01 22 Korea 2.5 23 Mexico 0.01 23 Switzerland 1.9 24 Korea 0.00 24 Austria 1.7 Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 6

Table 4. Permanent family immigrants, 2011 1 New Zealand 0.37 1 United States 64.8 2 Ireland 0.35 2 Korea 54.2 3 Norway 0.26 3 Ireland 47.2 4 Sweden 0.26 4 France 39.9 5 Australia 0.24 5 Portugal 38.8 6 Belgium 0.24 6 Finland 38.4 7 Switzerland 0.23 7 Japan 37.2 8 United States 0.22 8 New Zealand 36.9 9 Canada 0.16 9 Mexico 35.7 OECD average 0.16 10 Sweden 34.3 10 Finland 0.15 11 Belgium 33.4 11 Austria 0.15 12 Italy 26.7 12 Italy 0.14 OECD average 26.3 13 Netherlands 0.13 13 Australia 24.9 14 Portugal 0.13 14 Russian Federation 22.7 15 France 0.13 15 European Union 22.7 16 Spain 0.12 16 Canada 22.7 17 European Union 0.11 17 Norway 21.4 18 Germany 0.07 18 Netherlands 21.2 19 Russian Federation 0.07 19 Austria 20.9 20 Korea 0.06 20 Germany 18.6 21 United Kingdom 0.06 21 Spain 16.4 22 Denmark 0.06 22 Switzerland 14.3 23 Japan 0.02 23 United Kingdom 11.2 24 Mexico 0.01 24 Denmark 7.4 Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 7

Table 5. Permanent immigrants accompanying employment-based immigrants, 2011 1 Canada 0.27 1 Canada 36.9 2 New Zealand 0.26 2 Australia 26.2 3 Australia 0.25 3 New Zealand 25.7 4 United Kingdom 0.07 4 United Kingdom 13.4 5 Denmark 0.05 OECD average 7.2 OECD average 0.04 5 United States 7.0 6 Sweden 0.03 6 Denmark 6.5 7 United States 0.02 7 Korea 6.3 8 European Union 0.01 8 Sweden 3.5 9 Ireland 0.01 9 European Union 2.8 10 Korea 0.01 10 Ireland 1.7 11 Italy 0.01 11 Italy 1.1 12 Austria 0.00 12 Austria 0.4 13 Mexico 0.00 13 Mexico 0.0 13 Japan 0.00 13 Japan 0.0 13 Russian Federation 0.00 13 Russian Federation 0.0 13 France 0.00 13 France 0.0 13 Portugal 0.00 13 Portugal 0.0 13 Germany 0.00 13 Germany 0.0 13 Finland 0.00 13 Finland 0.0 13 Netherlands 0.00 13 Netherlands 0.0 13 Belgium 0.00 13 Belgium 0.0 13 Spain 0.00 13 Spain 0.0 13 Norway 0.00 13 Norway 0.0 13 Switzerland 0.00 13 Switzerland 0.0 Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 8

Table 6. Permanent family immigrants plus those accompanying employment-based immigrants, 2011 1 New Zealand 0.63 1 United States 71.8 2 Australia 0.50 2 New Zealand 62.6 3 Canada 0.43 3 Korea 60.5 4 Ireland 0.36 4 Canada 59.6 5 Sweden 0.29 5 Australia 51.1 6 Norway 0.26 6 Ireland 48.9 7 United States 0.24 7 France 39.9 8 Belgium 0.24 8 Portugal 38.8 9 Switzerland 0.23 9 Finland 38.4 OECD average 0.21 10 Sweden 37.7 10 Austria 0.15 11 Japan 37.2 11 Finland 0.15 12 Mexico 35.7 12 Italy 0.14 OECD average 33.5 13 United Kingdom 0.13 13 Belgium 33.4 14 Netherlands 0.13 14 Italy 27.9 15 Portugal 0.13 15 European Union 25.6 16 France 0.13 16 United Kingdom 24.6 17 European Union 0.13 17 Russian Federation 22.7 18 Spain 0.12 18 Norway 21.4 19 Denmark 0.10 19 Austria 21.3 20 Korea 0.07 20 Netherlands 21.2 21 Germany 0.07 21 Germany 18.6 22 Russian Federation 0.07 22 Spain 16.4 23 Japan 0.02 23 Switzerland 14.3 24 Mexico 0.01 24 Denmark 13.9 Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 9

Table 7. Permanent humanitarian immigrants, 2011 1 Sweden 0.13 1 Sweden 17.6 2 Norway 0.11 2 United States 15.9 3 Canada 0.11 3 Canada 14.5 4 Austria 0.08 4 Austria 11.0 5 Switzerland 0.07 5 Finland 11.0 6 Netherlands 0.06 6 Netherlands 10.1 7 New Zealand 0.06 7 Norway 8.9 8 Australia 0.06 OECD average 6.8 9 United States 0.05 8 Australia 6.4 OECD average 0.04 9 New Zealand 6.2 10 Finland 0.04 10 Denmark 5.4 11 Denmark 0.04 11 France 5.1 12 Belgium 0.03 12 Switzerland 4.6 13 United Kingdom 0.02 13 European Union 4.1 14 European Union 0.02 14 United Kingdom 3.8 15 France 0.02 15 Germany 3.8 16 Germany 0.01 16 Belgium 3.7 17 Italy 0.01 17 Italy 2.3 18 Ireland 0.00 18 Mexico 1.2 19 Spain 0.00 19 Japan 0.5 20 Russian Federation 0.00 20 Russian Federation 0.4 21 Portugal 0.00 21 Ireland 0.4 22 Mexico 0.00 22 Spain 0.3 23 Japan 0.00 23 Portugal 0.2 24 Korea 0.00 24 Korea 0.1 Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 10

Table 8. Other permanent immigrants, 2011 1 Denmark 0.06 1 Korea 36.9 2 United Kingdom 0.06 2 Japan 24.4 3 Korea 0.04 3 Mexico 15.8 4 France 0.03 4 United Kingdom 10.9 5 Russian Federation 0.03 5 Russian Federation 10.7 6 Portugal 0.03 6 France 10.0 7 Switzerland 0.02 7 Portugal 8.6 8 United States 0.02 8 Denmark 8.1 9 European Union 0.02 9 United States 6.2 OECD average 0.02 10 European Union 4.1 10 Finland 0.01 11 Finland 3.7 11 Spain 0.01 OECD average 2.5 12 Japan 0.01 12 Spain 1.9 13 Australia 0.01 13 Italy 1.6 14 Italy 0.01 14 Switzerland 1.5 15 Mexico 0.00 15 Australia 1.1 16 Austria 0.00 16 Germany 0.7 17 Germany 0.00 17 Austria 0.4 18 Canada 0.00 18 Canada 0.0 19 Netherlands 0.00 19 Netherlands 0.0 19 Belgium 0.00 19 Belgium 0.0 19 Ireland 0.00 19 Ireland 0.0 19 Sweden 0.00 19 Sweden 0.0 19 New Zealand 0.00 19 New Zealand 0.0 19 Norway 0.00 19 Norway 0.0 Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 11

Table 9. Permanent free-movement immigrants, 2011 1 Switzerland 1.25 1 Switzerland 77.6 2 Norway 0.78 2 Germany 67.9 3 Austria 0.45 3 Austria 65.5 4 Denmark 0.42 4 Norway 63.8 5 Netherlands 0.37 5 Netherlands 58.3 6 Belgium 0.36 6 Denmark 56.9 7 Spain 0.32 7 Belgium 51.2 8 Ireland 0.32 8 Ireland 43.0 9 Sweden 0.29 9 Spain 42.6 OECD average 0.26 10 European Union 42.2 10 Germany 0.24 OECD average 42.2 11 European Union 0.21 11 Finland 41.3 12 Italy 0.18 12 Sweden 38.0 13 Finland 0.16 13 Italy 34.9 14 Australia 0.15 14 France 33.7 15 United Kingdom 0.12 15 Portugal 32.7 16 Portugal 0.11 16 United Kingdom 21.2 17 France 0.11 17 Australia 15.7 18 New Zealand 0.08 18 New Zealand 8.3 19 Mexico 0.00 19 Mexico 0.0 19 Japan 0.00 19 Japan 0.0 19 Korea 0.00 19 Korea 0.0 19 Russian Federation 0.00 19 Russian Federation 0.0 19 United States 0.00 19 United States 0.0 19 Canada 0.00 19 Canada 0.0 Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 12

Endnotes i Percentages of total permanent immigration were calculated from underlying data. 2 Some countries include family derivatives of employment-based immigrants in the family categories, but no country included family derivatives in the employment category. The Outlook notes on page 24, Other countries either have few entries in [the family derivatives] category or classify accompanying family members with other family migrants. 3 OECD s underlying data tables provide percentages of the total population to 16 decimal places, allowing percentages of total immigration to be calculated without significant rounding error. Issue Brief: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context 13