SINER-GI Meeting Parma, June 2005

Similar documents
Geographical Indications in the WTO

Geographical Indications - Where now after Cancún?

The Future of TRIPS issues in the Doha Round

The Estey Centre Journal of. International Law. and Trade Policy. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement

Geographical Indications: Implications for Africa. By Catherine Grant For the Trade Law Centre of Southern Africa

MODULE X CURRENT TRIPS ISSUES*

MODULE. Conclusion. ESTIMATED TIME: 3 hours

LL.M. in International Legal Studies WTO LAW

( ) Page: 1/10 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD IN THE CENTRE WILLIAM RAPPARD ON 1-2 MARCH Chairperson: Ambassador Alfredo Suescum (Panama)

ANNEX V REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 23 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

ANNEX VI REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 24 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

International Regulation: Lessons from the IP Experience for the Internet

MARRAKESH AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ANNEX 1C: AGREEMENT ON TRADE-RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS *

Intellectual Property in WTO Dispute Settlement

CHAPTER TEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Industrial Property Quo Vadis? Where now after Cancún?

STATE GOVT S - WTO & FTA ISSUES CENTRE FOR WTO STUDIES, IIFT AUGUST 2012

OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) (1994)*

The Trans-Pacific Partnership

BACKGROUND NOTE PROPOSAL TO PERMANENTLY EXCLUDE NON-VIOLATION AND SITUATION COMPLAINTS FROM THE WTO TRIPS AGREEMENT. 20 September

ANNEX VII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 25 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

ANNEX XVII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 5 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

COMMENTS ON THE KENYA DRAFT GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS BILL

Geographical indications. Iustinianus Primus, March 16, 2016 Dr. Anke Moerland

Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law

Article 12 Geographical Indications. Article 12.1 Protection of Geographical Indications

Introduction to the WTO, Principles and Agreements

MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS THE URUGUAY ROUND

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

ANNEX XV REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 7 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

SUMMARY. Geneva, Switzerland

FROM DOHA TO THE JULY 2004 FRAMEWORK PACKAGE: A CONTENT ANALYSIS

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

The CAP yesterday, today and tomorow 2015/2016 SBSEM and European Commission. 13. The Doha Round Tomás García Azcárate

WTO Plus Commitments in RTAs. Presented By: Shailja Singh Assistant Professor Centre for WTO Studies New Delhi

Report (1996) of the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights*

OSHIKAWA Maika Head, Asia and Pacific Desk, Institute for Training and Technical Co-operation, World Trade Organization (WTO)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON THE PROTECTION OF TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

THE TREATMENT OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS IN RECENT REGIONAL AND BILATERAL FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS 1

A I P P I ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA PROTECTION DE LA PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE

The GATT WTO System: How it Works and The Challenges of Doha

2 WTO IN BRIEF. Global trade rules

Informal Brief. The Treatment Of Intellectual Property In The Ministerial Declaration: Mandated Negotiations And Reviews

Also available as an App to download to your tablet.

Introduction to the WTO Non-tariff Measures and the SPS & TBT Agreements

The 4 th WTO Ministerial Conference and WTO Work Programme Emerging from Doha: An Assessment

Article 1. Coverage and Application

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

37: Review and Amendment

AGREEMENT. On trade and economic cooperation between the Government of the Republic of Armenia and the Swiss Federal Council

P1: IBE CY CY564-Unctad-v1 November 27, :24 Char Count= 0. 4: Basic Principles

( ) Page: 1/12 STATUS OF NOTIFICATIONS OF NATIONAL LEGISLATION ON CUSTOMS VALUATION AND RESPONSES TO THE CHECKLIST OF ISSUES

CRS Report for Congress

A I P P I ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA PROTECTION DE LA PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE

Cancún: Crisis or Catharsis? Bernard Hoekman, World Bank 1. September 20, 2003

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Appendix B A WTO Description of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism

Chapter 2 Beyond the CBD and the Nagoya Protocol: Other Instruments that Affect ABS and Intellectual Property

INT L TRADE LAW: DOHA DECLARATION & AGRICULTURAL TRADE. Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Fourteen

Lecture 4 Multilateralism and Regionalism. Hyun-Hoon Lee Professor Kangwon National University

Chapter 9. The Political Economy of Trade Policy. Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop

Summary Report. Question Q191. Relationship between trademarks and geographical indications

To, Mr. Roberto Azevedo The Director General, WTO Geneva, Switzerland

Protection of GIs through their International Registration - how well advanced is the work in WIPO on the conclusion of a treaty?

The World Trade Organization...

The (Non)Use of Treaty Object and Purpose in IP Disputes in the WTO Henning Grosse Ruse - Khan

WITHHOLDING OR WITHDRAWAL OF CONCESSIONS

STANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS

THE ROLE OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO) TRADE FACILITATION NEGOTIATIONS

Multilateral Trading System in 2013 The Current State of Affairs & Expectations for the Short Term Bipul Chatterjee

JOB(03)/ July Preparations for the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference. Draft Cancún Ministerial Text

The World Trade Organization s Doha Development Agenda The Doha Negotiations after Six Years Progress Report at the End of 2007 TRADE FACILITATION

RULES OF ORIGIN. Chapter 9 1. OVERVIEW OF RULES. Figure 9-1

GATT DEPOSITORY LIBRARIES LIST OF THE PUBLICATIONS DEPOSITED IN EACH LIBRARY BASIC INSTRUMENTS AND SELECTED DOCUMENTS SERIESJ

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Course on WTO Law and Jurisprudence Part III: WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures. Which legal instruments can be invoked in a WTO dispute?

GATS & Domestic Regulation

NOTE. 3. Annexed is the Chapter from the WTO Analytical Index, 3 rd edition (2012) providing information on the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing.

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

Concept of IPRs International Protection and Enforcement in EU Trade Agreements

DRAFT GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS BILL 2007

FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL

FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALBANIA AND THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA

Main Provisions and Benefits of the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement (2015)

international law of contemporary media session 7: the law of the world trade organization

COMMUNICATION FROM EL SALVADOR, GUATEMALA HONDURAS AND NICARAGUA

A NEW TRANSPARENCY MECHANISM FOR REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS

Meeting of 25 June DG AGRI working document on international protection of EU Geographical Indications: objectives, outcome and challenges

The following text reproduces the Agreement1 between the Republic of Turkey and the Slovak Republic.

Since the UNECA / South Centre Policy Brief was written in May, there have been further developments:

Article XVI. Miscellaneous Provisions

TRADE POLICY REVIEW OF SOUTH AFRICA 1-2 JUNE GATT Council's Evaluation

STANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS

Trade Policy Analyses

Introduction to the WTO. Will Martin World Bank 10 May 2006

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Transcription:

SINER-GI Meeting Parma, 21-22 June 2005 The WTO and geographical indications: ongoing discussions and negotiations Thu-Lang TRAN WASESCHA Counsellor Intellectual Property Division TLTW-June 2005 updated 3 August 2005 1

Structure of presentation The WTO (predecessor = GATT) Intellectual property in general Background regarding GIs in GATT/WTO TRIPS provisions on GIs (Section 3 of Part II) and other provisions of relevance to GIs Ongoing work and negotiations Dispute settlement 2

Core principles of the WTO multilateral trade system Belief that an open, stable and rules-based multilateral trading system is beneficial for welfare of all countries, especially smaller and developing countries Recognition of need for flexibility to take account of the trade and development interests of developing countries 3

The WTO: Three Basic Functions Set of rules for international trade Forum for negotiations Forum for monitoring implementation and resolution of disputes 4

A few dates in GATT/ WTO history (1) Havana Conference GATT entered into force Annecy Torquay Geneva Dillon Round Kennedy Round Tokyo Round Uruguay Round Marrakesh Conference WTO established 1947 1948 1948 1950 1956 60-61 64-67 73-79 86-93 1994 1995 5

A few dates in GATT/ WTO history (2) Singapore Geneva Seattle Doha Hong Kong 1996 1998 1999 2001 -... 2005 6

The WTO membership Membership: 148 Members, including customs territories = 93.93% world exports of merchandises and 97.35% of world exports of commercial services 33 Observers (31 acceding); acceding ones = "participants in the negotiations" in the Doha work programme http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/thewto_e. htm#members 7

The WTO functioning Member-driven organization Single package or undertaking Decision-making. Consensus rule 8

The Main WTO Agreements See: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tratop_e.htm Uruguay Round results. Package The Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (Marrakesh Agreement): Multilateral Agreements on Trade in Goods GATT (1994) 13 agreements on specific issues 9

The Main WTO Agreements The Agreement on Trade in Services The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) = Annex 1C The Dispute Settlement Understanding [Plurilateral agreements (i.e. not part of the single package) : civil aircraft, government procurement] 10

11

12

Importance of IPRs Fierce competition for markets and investments IPRs = added value for commodities and results and activities Interests of society at large; need to have a balance between interests. Not a new debate. Constant attempt to strike the balance. What would it be "new" then? "Global village", complexity of issues and situations, technology advances 13

Balance of interests Right owner Third party (competitor) Consumer 14

The TRIPS Agreement TRIPS = ANNEX 1C of the WTO Agreement Why in GATT? Central body of international rights and obligations in the intellectual property (IP) field. Comprehensiveness. In the Uruguay Round: not only N-S issues but also N-N ones 15

IPRs under TRIPS Agreement Copyright Artistic works Literary works [computer software and data bases] Related (neighbouring) rights Performers Phonogram producers Broadcasters Industrial property Trademarks Geographical indications Industrial designs Patents Plant varieties protection Topographies of int. circ. Undisclosed information (e.g. trade secrets; test data) 16

TRIPS Structure Part I: General provisions and basic principles Part II: Standards concerning the availability, scope and use of IPRS Section 1: Copyright and related rights Section 2: Trademarks Section 3: Geographical indications Section 4: Industrial designs Section 5: Patents Section 6: Lay-out designs (topographies) of integrated circuits Section 7: Protection of undisclosed information Section 8: Control of anti-competitive practices in contractual licenses Part III: Enforcement of IPRs Section 1: General obligations Section 2: Civil and administrative procedures and remedies Section 3: Provisional measures Section 4: Special requirements related to border measures Section 5: Criminal procedures Part IV: Acquisition and maintenance of IPRs and related inter partes procedures Part V: Dispute prevention and settlement Part VI: Transitional arrangements Part VII: Institutional arrangements; final provisions 17

Some basic concepts and principles in IP law Often mentioned in the discussions on GIs IPR = "intangible" property Territoriality principle Independence of rights Balance of rights and obligations etc. 18

TRIPS / ADPIC Annex 1C: Agreement ontrade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Accordo sugli aspetti dei diritti di proprietà intellettuale attinenti al commercio Accord sur les aspects des droits de propriété intellectuelle qui touchent au commerce See: http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27- trips.pdf 19

TRIPS Agreement: main features Coverage; basic principles; minimum standards for each category of IPR; enforcement; dispute settlement; transitional arrangements; transition law; administrative provisions Minimum level of protection, subject to certain provisions for DCs and LDcs 20

TRIPS Agreement: general provisions and basic principles (Part I) Freedom to determine the appropriate method of implementing the Agreement (Art. 1.1) Incorporation of existing conventions (e.g. Paris and Berne Conventions) National treatment (Art. 3) Most-favoured nation treatment (MFN) (Art. 4, 5) 21

GIs: background Complex and controversial issue both at national and international levels; commercial, economic, socio-historical, cultural. "New World Old World" WIPO: Paris Convention revision (draft Art. 10quater); Lisbon Agreement Stresa Convention (cheese) GATT 1947 provisions Uruguay Round and the "deal" Terminology: diversity; TRIPS definition of a GI 22

Relevant provisions in TRIPS Section 3 of Part II National and MFN treatment (Art. 3-5) TRIPS and GIs Procedures of acquisition & maintenance of rights if registration is foreseen (Art. 62) Enforcement (Part III) Transition periods (Art. 65), dispute settlement (Art. 64) 23

TRIPS and GIs [Outside TRIPS: national laws, bilateral, regional and other multilateral agreements] TRIPS: Article 23 - higher protection for wines and spirits (minimum, mandatory) (+ Art. 24.2-9) TRIPS: Article 22 (minimum, mandatory) - Misleading/confusion test - Unfair competition 24

Article 22 Article 22.1 Definition "...indications which identify a good as originating in the territory of a Member, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin." Wide definition Reflected in the great majority of WTO Members laws 25

Basic level of protection: Article 22.2 and 22.3 For all products other than wines and spirits Against use which: misleads the public as to the geographical origin of the good; constitutes an act of unfair competition (Art. 10bis Paris Convention) Against registration as a trademark if use of the GI in the trademark would mislead the public as to origin 26

Additional protection for wines and spirits (Art. 23) Additional protection against use of a GI for wines on wines (and for spirits on spirits) not originating in the place indicated by the GI: without requirement to show misleading of the public or act of unfair competition even where the true origin of the good is indicated; and even where the GI is accompanied by expressions, e.g. kind, type, style, imitation Against registration as a trademark with respect to wines and spirits not having the origin indicated 27

Article 24 exceptions The protection under Article 23 is to be read in conjunction with the exceptions under Article 24. Generic terms ( customary ) (Article 24.6) Prior trademark rights (Article 24.5): Certain other prior uses (Article 24.4) (grandfather clause): Personal names (Article 24.8) GIs not protected or used in their country of origin (Article 24.9) 28

Art. 22.4 (for all GIs) Homonymous GIs (Art. 22.4, 23.3) protection against use which, though literally true, falsely represents to the public that the goods originated in another country Art. 23.3 (for GIs for wines): subject to Article 22.4, coexistence subject to: practical conditions under which the indication will be differentiated taking into account the need to ensure equitable treatment of the producers concerned and that consumers are not misled 29

Article 24.1 International negotiations "aimed at increasing the protection of individual geographical indications under Article 23. The provisions of paragraphs 4 through 8... shall not be used by a Member to refuse to conduct negotiations or to conclude bilateral or multilateral agreements.... " 30

Register: Article 23.4 In order to facilitate the protection of geographical indications for wines, negotiations shall be undertaken in the Council for TRIPS concerning the establishment of a multilateral system of notification and registration of geographical indications for wines eligible for protection in those Members participating in the system. Unfinished business" from the Uruguay Round 31

2001: Doha Results: Launch of a new round of negotiations (Doha Development Agenda) Doha Ministerial Declarations and Decision of relevance to TRIPS: WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2 (public health) WT/MIN(01)/17 ( JOB(01)/152/Rev.1 (outstanding implementation issues)) 32

Doha Negotiations: Structure Negotiations take place during special sessions of existing WTO bodies (except those marked (*)) Trade Negotiations Committee Chairman: (WTO DG) Goods Services TRIPS Other issues - Agriculture - NAMA (*) - Trade Facilitation (*) - Cotton - Services - Geographical indications for wines and spirits - Dispute settlement - Development - Environment - Rules (*) 33

Doha Declaration and GIs Document WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 See: http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/ minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm Paragraph 18, 1st sentence: negotiation on the establishment of a system of notification and registration of GIs for wines and spirits Paragraph 18, 2nd sentence: extension (i.e. for other products) + paragraph 12 34

Doha Declaration: register Paragraph 18, first sentence: (wines and spirits) With a view to completing the work started in the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Council for TRIPS) on the implementation of Article 23.4, we agree to negotiate the establishment of a multilateral system of notification and registration of geographical indications for wines and spirits by the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference. Fifth Ministerial Conference: September 2003 [Was supposed to be the "early harvest" within the single undertaking] 35

Doha Declaration: "extension" Paragraph 18, second sentence: We note that issues related to the extension of the protection of geographical indications provided for in Article 23 to products other than wines and spirits will be addressed in the Council for TRIPS pursuant to paragraph 12 of this Declaration. Paragraph 12: (b) the other outstanding implementation issues shall be addressed as a matter of priority by the relevant WTO bodies, which shall report to the Trade Negotiations Committee, established under paragraph 46 below, by the end of 2002 for appropriate action. 36

TRIPS Council since Doha: regular session and Special Session TRIPS COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION, Review of legislation, public health, Biotech./TK/biodiversity, GIs (extension until end 2002), etc. SPECIAL SESSION Negotiations /mult. System of notif. & reg. of GIs for wines and spirits 37

July package 2004 July package (Decision of the General Council of 1 st August 2004 WT/L/579) a. Agriculture and Annex A b. Cotton (see agriculture) c. NAMA and Annex B d. Development (including outstanding implementation issues): inter alia, extension e. Other negotiating bodies (including TRIPS Special Session). For Services, Annex C. f. Trade facilitation and Annex D Other Singapore issues g. Other elements of the Doha Work Programme (moratoria, etc.) 38

Ongoing discussion/work and proposals on GIs in the WTO 1. Art. 63.2 notification-review; Art. 24.2 review (examination) of implementation 2. Negotiations on the establishment of a multilateral system of notification and registration of GIs for wines and spirits (Art. 23.4 + Doha) 3. Issues related to the extension of the protection of GIs provided in Art. 23 to products other than wines and spirits 4. EC proposal in Agriculture negotiations for "claw-back" of use of certain GIs (Annex W of JOB(03)/12) + (JOB(03)12/Add.1)) 5. Dispute settlement 1. TRIPS Council (regular session) 2. TRIPS Council Special Session 3. GC/TNC + DG/DDG consultations 4. Committee Agriculture Special Session 5. DSB 39

GIs in the TRIPS Council regular session Notifications under Article 63.2 (laws, regulations and practices) general laws relevant to IP, patent law, trademark law, GIs, etc. : for GIs, IP/N/1/[code country/g/.. Review of national legislation (laws, regulations and practices) Compilation in IP/Q/country/.. series 40

Article 24.2 review TRIPS Council, regular Secretariat Checklist (IP/C/3 and IP/C/3/Add.1)) session Responses: 46 replies so far (IP/C/W117/ series) Summary (by the Secretariat) of 44 responses to the checklist of questions (IP/C/W/253/Rev.1) On-going process. 41

TRIPS Council regular session [GIs "extension" (until end of 2002); moved to a higher level; see slide 51] 42

Register for wines and Work since 1997 in the TRIPS Council regarding Article 23.4: see annex of TN/IP/8 Before Doha; documents series IP/C/W/.., IP/C/M/.., JOB... by Members and Secretariat) After Doha, work in the Special Session of the TRIPS Council; documents series TN (Trade Negotiations): TN/IP/.. (reports of the Chair to the TNC) TN/IP/W/.. (working documents) TN/IP/M/.. (minutes) JOB... spirits (1) 43

Register for wines and spirits (2) Main actors: Demandeurs: EU, other European countries and certain DCs Non-demandeurs ( joint proposal group ): Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Dom. Rep., Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Chinese Taipei, United States, etc. 44

: Register for wines and spirits (3) Secretariat papers on multilateral notification and registration systems (TN/IP/W/4 and TN/IP/W/4/Add.1/Rev.1) Secretariat compilation of issues and points (TN/IP/W/7/Rev.1 + (Corr.1): delegations' arguments and counter-arguments 45

Main issues raised and points made (TN/IP/W/7/Rev.1): Register for wines and spirits (4) Objective: facilitate or increase level of protection? Meaning of multilateral system Definition and eligibility for protection: country names traditional expressions non-geographical names exceptions 46

Register for wines and spirits (5) Participation, in particular with regard to effects on participating and non-participating countries Legal effects of a registered GI Other issues, including translations and administrative and other burdens Freedom to determine the appropriate metnod of implementing GI protection (special system, certification mark, unfair competition law, consumer protection law, etc.) 47

Register for wines and Two basic approaches: Register with a data base (lists of GIs); commitment of Members to consult for decisions at national level regarding protection of a GI spirits (6) Register with challenges at the multilateral level and with registrations having a legal effect of a presumption of eligibility for protection) [+ arbitration (CH)] Proposal by Hong Kong, China: presumption of ownership; voluntary participation; no opposition mechanism 48

Register for wines and Two key issues blocks (legal effects and participation): Legal effects in all WTO Members? spirits (7) Legal effects mandatory only in those opting to participate in the system? Legal effects, if any, should be left to the national authorities when making a decision concerning the protection of a GI But also other identified problems or difficulties: translations; administrative and other burdens, in particular for developing countries, etc. 49

Register for wines and spirits (8) In April 2003: Chairman s JOB(03)/75: text in treaty language: single text for less controversial points and options for controversial ones. July package (WT/L/579) of 1 August 2004 on the overall process/program of negotiations: paragraph f ("the Council reaffirms Members commitment to progress") 50

Change of gears in 2005 Register for wines and spirits (9) In March 2005: Proposal for a Draft Decision by Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Dom. Rep., Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, NZ, Chinese Taipei and US; in June 2005, joined by Guatemala and Japan (TN/IP/W/10)) June 2005: EC proposal (TN/IP/W/11) (Annex: "Multilateral System of Notification and Registration of Geographical Indications"). Also circulated as WT/GC/547 TN/C/W/26 51

Extension: the proposal = Extension of the higher protection of GIs for wines and spirits to other products. What do proponents want? (TN/C/W/14 of 2003) Article 23 to apply to all GIs Article 24 exceptions to apply mutatis mutandis (by analogy) Multilateral register (of GIs for wines and spirits) to apply to all GIs 52

Extension: the main actors Main actors: EU, other European countries, certain DCs (India, Jamaica, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, etc.) Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Chinese Taipei, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, New Zealand, United States, etc. Proposed coverage for products: agricultural, foodstuffs, handicrafts, industrial products 53

Extension: process since Doha Competition for the hearts and minds of the agnostic Members First dealt with in TRIPS Council regular session End 2002: no agreement on report; topic forwarded to TNC as part of "outstanding implementation issues" 2003 prior to Cancun: consultations by DG in his capacity as DG Cancun July package 2004: development implementation issue; consultations by DG mandated. Report to be made by July 2005 54

Extension: process since Doha DG Deputy Director-General technical level consultations in 2005 Time horizon of July 2005 Secretariat s compilation of points made and issues (WT/GC/W/546 -TN/C/W/25) June 2005: EC proposal in WT/GC/W547- TN/C/W/26 (and TN/IP/W/11, see register) Report of TNC Chairman to GC on 29 July 2005: TN/C/5, pages 11-12 55

Extension: summary of process since Doha General Council TNC DG /DDG Consultations TRIPS COUNCIL Regular session until end of 2002 56

(Non exhaustive list) Extension: issues discussed (1) Discrimination of protection in regard to goods National treatment and MFN Balance of rights and obligations in TRIPS would be disrupted Scope of protection difficulty of assessing impact, etc. Definition and eligibility issues (protection of country names, non-place names, etc.) Prior trademarks 57

Extension: issues discussed (2) Impact on producers in-/outside area indicated by GI Fairness and legitimacy: original producer; migration At domestic level / third countries Impact on consumers Administrative costs and burdens New legislation / institutions? Procedures Enforcement 58

The EU s claw-back proposal EC proposal in Agriculture negotiations for "claw-back" of use (or "market access" for) of certain GIs in August 2003 (Annex W of JOB(03)/12): roll-back of EU 15 Members names being generic or grand-fathered Wines and spirits Foodstuffs [Cancun: Derbez text JOB(03)/150/Rev.2, Annex A as issues of interest but not agreed ] 59

Complaints by US and Australia EC Regulation 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs. WT/DS174/R and WT/DS290/R GIs and dispute settlement (1) 60

GIs and dispute Discrimination settlement (2) Protection contingent upon another country adopting equivalent system and offering reciprocal protection (including factual question about the proper interpretation) Requires certain systems from other governments; hence foreign nationals don t have guaranteed access to the EC system 61

GIs and dispute "Co-existence" settlement (3) Sufficiently constrained to qualify as a limited exception under Art. 17 TRIPS TRIPS does not allow unqualified co-existence of GIs with prior trademarks 62

GIs and dispute settlement (4) Agreement US-Australia-EC that reasonable period of time for the EC to implement recommendations and rulings of DSB = 11 months and 2 weeks, i.e. 3 April 2006 (WT/DS174/29 and WT/DS290/22) 63

Challenges and difficulties(1) Complex and hot issue; complexity of negotiations in the UR Economic and historical background; New world - Old world Difficult questions proper to the negotiations of the register: key issues of legal effects and participation; administrative and other burdens for Members, in particular DCs, etc. 64

Challenges and difficulties (2) Linkage with extension EC claw-back proposal in agriculture Negotiations/work: Emotional, especially with regard to extension High stakes? Empirical evidence? 65

Consult our website www.wto.org Other questions to: thu-lang.tranwasescha@wto.org Tel.: +41 22 739 57 05 Office N : 3166 66