Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Similar documents
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Committee on International Trade

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Amended proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION

Amended proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 16 July 2004 (OR. en) 11297/04 Interinstitutional File: 2004/0143 (ACC) AGRI 186 WTO 79

*** DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

Possibility of obtaining a new ACP-EC waiver at the WTO

EC Regime for the importation, sale and distribution of Bananas. Recourse to Article 21.5 by the United States of America (DS 27)

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

PARTIE II RAPPORT RÉGIONAL. établie par le Professeur Nigel Lowe, Faculté de droit de l Université de Cardiff * * *

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preamble

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

2-3 February 2011 Brussels

Introduction to the WTO, Principles and Agreements

AGREEMENT IN THE FORM OF AN EXCHANGE OF LETTERS BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY CONCERNING CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS

Article XXVIII* Modification of Schedules

16395/11 JPP/DOS/kst DG C

The following communication, dated 13 June 2005, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of the European Communities.

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 May 2014 (OR. en) 2012/0359 (COD) LEX 1553 PE-CONS 27/1/14 REV 1 ANTIDUMPING 8 COMER 28 WTO 39 CODEC 287

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Brussels, 30 January 2014 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 5870/14. Dossier interinstitutionnel: 2013/0268 (COD) JUSTCIV 17 PI 11 CODEC 225

UNILATERAL MEASURES CHAPTER 15 A. OVERVIEW OF RULES 1. BACKGROUND OF RULES 1) DEFINITION 2) HISTORY OF UNILATERAL MEASURES

MEMO/08/519. The issue: the new visa reciprocity mechanism. Content of the third Commission report of 13 September Brussels, 23 July 2008

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 April /11 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0094 (CNS) PI 32 PROPOSAL

What is the state of play in the WTO negotiations on the liberalisation of trade in tropical products and preference erosion?

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Council of the European Union Brussels, 21 April 2016 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 10 November 2008 (OR. fr) 12129/08 ACP 142 WTO 153 COAFR 262 RELEX 564

Scopes *only applicable for Hapag-Lloyd called ports Valid to: Until further notice

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Professor Nigel Lowe QC (Hon) and Victoria Stephens. To inform discussions of the Seventh Meeting of the Special Commission

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

RESTRICTED. COUNCIL Original: English/ 12 May 1993 French/ Spanish

Brexit. Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan. For presentation at Adult Learning Institute April 11,

Table A.1. Jointly Democratic, Contiguous Dyads (for entire time period noted) Time Period State A State B Border First Joint Which Comes First?

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

EUROPEAN COUNCIL Brussels, 18 June 2013 (OR. en)

Lessons learned in the negotiation of the Pacific Alliance on IRC.

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 161/ 128. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 866/2004 of

WORLD DECEMBER 10, 2018 Newest Potential Net Migration Index Shows Gains and Losses BY NELI ESIPOVA, JULIE RAY AND ANITA PUGLIESE

Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union. Act of Accession and its Annexes

DECISIONS. (Text with EEA relevance)

JOINT TEXT INITIALLED ON 23 NOVEMBER 2007 IN BRUSSELS

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of establishing the list of supporting documents to be presented by visa applicants in Ireland

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Official Journal of the European Union L 347/865

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

NEGOTIATIONS ON ACCESSION BY BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

The EU Visa Code will apply from 5 April 2010

List of countries whose citizens are exempted from the visa requirement

Economic integration: an agreement between

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Chapter 14. Unilateral Measures

Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU (25 April 2005)

NEGOTIATIONS ON ACCESSION BY BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

Generating Executive Incentives: The Role of Domestic Judicial Power in International Human Rights Court Effectiveness

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Status of Ratification and Implementation of the Kampala Amendments on the Crime of Aggression Update No. 11 (information as of 21 January 2014) 1

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, Done at Panama City, January 30, 1975 O.A.S.T.S. No. 42, 14 I.L.M.

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

LIMITE EN. Brussels, 30 September 2009 CONFERENCE ON ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION CROATIA AD 13/09 LIMITE CONF-HR 8

Official Journal of the European Union L 202/7

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

QGIS.org - Donations and Sponsorship Analysis 2016

CARIFORUM EU EPA: A Look at the Cultural Provisions. Rosalea Hamilton Founding Director, Institute of Law & Economics Jamaica.

15466/15 RD/DOS/vm DGD 1

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

B COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 481/2012 of 7 June 2012 laying down rules for the management of a tariff quota for high-quality beef

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES FOURTH REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

GUARANTOR'S UNDERTAKING GUARANTEE

L 127/6 Official Journal of the European Union

Q&A on the European Citizens' Initiative

Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union. Accession Protocol and its Annexes

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY ON A NORWEGIAN FINANCIAL MECHANISM FOR THE PERIOD

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.3.2010 COM(2010)96 final 2010/0056 (COD) C7-0074/10 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 on the tariff rates for bananas EN EN

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Council Regulation (E EC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 esta blished a common organisation of the m arket in bananas in th e European Communities. After the adoption of this Council Regulation, several Latin American WTO Members supplying bananas to the EU on a Most Favoured Nation basis as well as the United States initiated W TO dispute settlement proceed ings agains t the EU (notab ly the long standing disp ute W T/DS27) with respect to th e different treatm ent of bananas introdu ced into the European Union market by different suppliers. On 11 April 2001 and on 30 April 2001, re spectively, the Comm ission reached Understandings with Ecuador and the United S tates which set the cond itions to r esolve the disputes. Those Understandings envisaged the in troduction of a ' tariff regim e only' for the imports of bananas in 2006. On 14 Nove mber 2001, the WTO Doha M inisterial Conference adopted waivers from t he EU obligations under Articles I (Doha W aiver) and XIII of the GATT regarding the preferential treatm ent gr anted to products of ACP origin under the Cotonou Agreement. Those waivers established as a condition for the waiver with respect to bananas that the new tariff only regim e to be introduced in 2006 "would result in at least maintaining total m arket access for MFN banana suppliers" and provided for an arbitration mechanism in case of disagreement. On 12 July 2004, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations under Article XXVIII of the General Agreem ent on Tariffs and Trade 1994 ("GATT 1994") with a view to introducing a tariff only regime for bananas in the EC schedule. Accordingly, the Community notified the WTO on 15 July 2004 of its intention to m odify concessions on item 0803 00 19 (bananas) in the EC WTO Schedule (CXL). Negotiations were conducted by the Commission in consultation with the Comm ittee established by Article 133 of the Treaty and the Special Committee on Agriculture and within the fram ework of the negotiating di rectives issued by the Council. These negotiations failed to lead to an agreement. On 31 January 2005 the Community notified th e WTO of its intention to replace its concessions on item 0803 00 19 (bananas) with a bound duty of 230/tonne. On 30 March 2005 several WTO Members (Brazil, Colom bia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatem ala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panam a and Venezuela) requeste d arbitration under th e Doha waiver. The Arbitrator s Award issued on 1 August 2005 concluded that the MFN tariff rate of 230/tonne proposed by the Community was not consistent with the conditions of the Doha Waiver. The Commission revised the Community proposal in light of the arbitrator s findings. In a second arbitration award, issued on 27 October 2005, the Arbitrator concluded that the revised proposal for an MFN tariff rate of 187/tonne also failed to rectify the matter. In view of its obligation to introduce a tariff only regim e by 1 J anuary 2006, and in consideration of the lack of agreement on a bound duty, the EU introdu ced an applied MFN duty of 176/tonne through Council Regulatio n (EC) No 1964/2005. This regulation also opened an autonom ous tariff quota of 775 000 tonnes net weight subject to a zero-duty rate for im ports of bananas originating in ACP countries. The EU did not notify any further proposal to modify its tariff schedule on bananas, pending an agreem ent with MF N banana suppliers. Since 1 January 2008, ACP banana suppliers have enjoy duty-free quota-free access to the EU market on the basis of Economic Partnership Agreements with the EU. EN 2 EN

On 23 Febr uary 2007 and on 29 J une 2007, respectively, Ecuador and the United States requested the establishm ent of a panel pur suant to Article 21.5 of the W TO Dispute Settlement Understanding concerning the alleged inconsistency with the WTO agreements of measures adopted by the EU to com ply w ith the W TO Dispute Settlem ent Body (DSB) reports in th e dispute WT/DS27. The final repo rts were ad opted by th e DSB in Decem ber 2008. The report in the case brought by Ecuador stated that the EU applied tariff ( 176/tonne) on bananas was inconsistent with the EU tari ff bindings under GATT 1994. Both reports also ruled that the preferen ce grante d by the EU at the tim e of th e es tablishment of the pane l (775 000 tonnes duty free) was inconsistent with the GATT 1994. On 22 March 2004 and on 29 January 2007 the C ouncil authorised the Comm ission to open negotiations under Article XXIV: 6 of the GATT 1994 in the cour se of the accession to the European Union of the Czech Republic, the Repub lic of Estonia, the R epublic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Bulgaria and the Republic of Romania, respectively. The negotiations under Article X XVIII and Article XXIV:6 of the GATT 1994 were successfully concluded on 15 December 2009 by the initialling of a "Geneva Agreement on Trade in Bananas" with Brazil, Colom bia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatem ala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panam a, Peru and Venezu ela ("the Geneva Agreem ent") and of an "Agreement on Trade in Bananas" with the United States of Am erica (the "EU/US Agreement"). The agreements negotiated by the C ommission provide for the settlement of the claims of the countries concerned under Articles XXIV:6 and XXVIII of the GATT. In addition, they implement the Understandings by binding a ' tariff regime only' and provide a solution to all the pending disputes concerning the tariff treatm ent of banana s, which should therefore be formally settled upon certification of the new EU tariff schedule on bananas. With the Geneva Agre ement enter ing in to f orce, it is the refore ne cessary to abo lish the existing applied EU MFN tariff rate for the importation of bananas by repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 of 29 Nove mber 2005 on the tariff rates for bananas which established the currently applied rate of 176/tonne. EN 3 EN

2010/0056 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 on the tariff rates for bananas THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the T reaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, After transmission of the proposal to the national Parliaments, Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, Whereas: (1) Council Regulation (E C) No 1964/2005 1 provides that the tariff rate for bananas of CN code 0803 00 19 is to be EUR 176/tonne as from 1 January 2006. (2) On xx.xx.2010 the European Union signed the "Geneva Agreem ent on Trade in Bananas" with Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru and Venezuela rega rding the stru cture and operation of the Union's trading regime for bananas of CN code 0803 00 19 (the "Agreement"). (3) In accordance with the Agreem ent, the Union will gradua lly reduce its banana tariff from EUR 176/tonne to EUR 114/tonne. A firs t cut, which was applied retroactively as of 15 December 2009, the date of initialli ng of the Agreement, reduced the tariff to EUR 148/tonne. The subsequent cuts are to apply in seven annual instalm ents with a possible delay of a m aximum of two years if agreement on agriculture modalities in the Doha Round of the World Trade Organiza tion (WTO) is delayed. The final tariff of EUR 114/tonne is to be reached on 1 January 2019 at the latest. The tariff reductions will be bou nd in the W TO at the moment of the ce rtification of the EU banana schedule. (4) After having been applied provisionally since its date of signature, the Agreement was approved by Council Decision / /EU 2. It entered into force on [ ]. (5) As a consequence, it is appropriate to repeal Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005, 1 JO L 316, 2.12.2005, p. 1. 2 JO L.. EN 4 EN

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 is repealed. Article 1 This Regulation shall enter into force on [ 3 ] Article 2 This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States Done at Brussels, For the European Parliament The President For the Council The President 3 Date not before date of entry into force of the Geneva Agreement on Trade in Bananas; to be determined EN 5 EN

STATEMENT 1. BUDGET HEADING: Chapter 12 Customs duties and other duties FichFin/10/50124(DDG/EM/tm) 6.9.2010.1 DATE: 27/01/2010 APPROPRIATIONS: B2010 : 14.079,7 Mio 2. TITLES: Proposal for a Council Decision on the signature and provisional application of a "General Agreement on Trade in Bananas" between the European Union and Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru and Venezuela and of an "Agreement on Trade in Bananas" between the European Union and the United States, & Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a "General Agreement on Trade in Bananas" between the European Union and Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru and Venezuela and of an "Agreement on Trade in Bananas" between the European Union and the United States, & Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 on the tariff rates for bananas 3. LEGAL BASIS: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Articles 207(4), 218(5)(6) and 207(2). 4. AIMS: Signature, provisional application and conclusion of two Agreements on Trade in Bananas and repealing the regulation on the tariff rates for bananas. 5. IMPLICATIONS PAST 2009 (EUR million) CURRENT 2010 (EUR million) FOLLOWING 2011 (EUR million) FOLLOWING 2012 (EUR million) 5.0 EXPENDITURE - - - - - CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET (REFUNDS/INTERVENTIONS) - NATIONAL AUTHORITIES - OTHER 5.1 REVENUE - OWN RESOURCES OF THE EC -3.5-7 4.8-88.1-106.8 (LEVIES/CUSTOMS DUTIES) 5.2 METHOD OF CALCULATION: Based on applying the reduced tariff rates on imports of NC Code 0803.00.19 of the recent 12 months available. 6.0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE YES NO RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? 6.1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF YES NO THE CURRENT BUDGET? 6.2 WILL A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET BE NECESSARY? YES NO 6.3 WILL APPROPRIATIONS NEED TO BE ENTERED IN FUTURE BUDGETS? YES NO OBSERVATIONS: The Agreements reduce progressively the tariff rates for bananas. It can be estimated that these measures will lead to smaller own resources which is indicated at point 5.1, net amounts after deduction of collecting costs by Member States. (An estimate of the loss of own resources for 2009 was included because of the retroactive validity of these Agreements to 15/12/2009). EN 6 EN