Peruvians in the United States

Similar documents
Ecuadorians in the United States

Dominicans in New York City

The Latino Population of New York City, 2008

Demographic, Economic and Social Transformations in Bronx Community District 4: High Bridge, Concourse and Mount Eden,

Mexicans in New York City, : A Visual Data Base

A Profile of Latina Women in New York City, 2007

CLACLS. Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Bronx Community District 5:

CLACLS. A Profile of Latino Citizenship in the United States: Demographic, Educational and Economic Trends between 1990 and 2013

Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Brooklyn Community District 4: Bushwick,

Puerto Ricans in the United States, : Demographic, Economic, and Social Aspects

Fertility Rates among Mexicans in Traditional And New States of Settlement, 2006

The Latino Population of the New York Metropolitan Area,

Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Queens Community District 3: East Elmhurst, Jackson Heights, and North Corona,

Mexicans in New York City, 2007: An Update

Astrid S. Rodríguez Fellow, Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies. Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies

Trends in Poverty Rates Among Latinos in New York City and the United States,

Socio-Economic Mobility Among Foreign-Born Latin American and Caribbean Nationalities in New York City,

Washington Heights/Inwood Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations with a Special Focus on the Dominican Population

LATINO DATA PROJECT. Astrid S. Rodríguez Ph.D. Candidate, Educational Psychology. Center for Latin American, Caribbean, and Latino Studies

Demographic Change and Voting Patterns among Latinos in the Northeast Corridor States: New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Election: A Visual Database

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Elections: a Visual Data Base

Latino Voter Registration and Participation Rates in the November 2016 Presidential Election

CLACLS. Demographic, Economic and Social Transformations in the Mexican-Origin Population of the New York City Metropolitan Area,

The Effects of Immigration on Age Structure and Fertility in the United States

Latino Middle Class Income-Earners in New York City in 2006

LATINOS IN CALIFORNIA, TEXAS, NEW YORK, FLORIDA AND NEW JERSEY

Understanding the Immigrant Experience Lessons and themes for economic opportunity. Owen J. Furuseth and Laura Simmons UNC Charlotte Urban Institute

Latinos in Massachusetts Selected Areas: Framingham

DATA PROFILES OF IMMIGRANTS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Salvadorans. in Boston

LATINOS IN AMERICA: A Demographic Profile

Labor Force Characteristics by Race and Ethnicity, 2015

Brockton and Abington

Migration Information Source - Chinese Immigrants in the United States

Pulling Open the Sticky Door

California s Congressional District 37 Demographic Sketch

LATINO DATA PROJECT. Disparities in Health and Well-Being among Latinos in Washington Heights/Inwood

Characteristics of People. The Latino population has more people under the age of 18 and fewer elderly people than the non-hispanic White population.

HEALTH CARE EXPERIENCES

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

Geographic Mobility of New Jersey Residents. Migration affects the number and characteristics of our resident population

Illegal Immigration: How Should We Deal With It?

8 Pathways Spring 2015

Older Immigrants in the United States By Aaron Terrazas Migration Policy Institute

Old Places, New Places: Geographic Mobility of Dominicans in the U.S.

Notes on People of Dominican Ancestry in Canada

Extrapolated Versus Actual Rates of Violent Crime, California and the United States, from a 1992 Vantage Point

Racial Disparities in the Direct Care Workforce: Spotlight on Hispanic/Latino Workers

Far From the Commonwealth: A Report on Low- Income Asian Americans in Massachusetts

Institute for Public Policy and Economic Analysis

Hispanic Employment in Construction

Inside the 2012 Latino Electorate

ASSIMILATION AND LANGUAGE

Evaluating the Role of Immigration in U.S. Population Projections

DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CUBAN-AMERICANS: A FIRST LOOK FROM THE U.S POPULATION CENSUS

GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES

The Changing Face of Labor,

We know that the Latinx community still faces many challenges, in particular the unresolved immigration status of so many in our community.

IX. Differences Across Racial/Ethnic Groups: Whites, African Americans, Hispanics

Benefit levels and US immigrants welfare receipts

The foreign born are more geographically concentrated than the native population.

Children of Immigrants

Brazilians. in Boston

Chapter 1: The Demographics of McLennan County

ESTIMATES OF INTERGENERATIONAL LANGUAGE SHIFT: SURVEYS, MEASURES, AND DOMAINS

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Skagit County, Washington. Prepared by: Skagit Council of Governments 204 West Montgomery Street, Mount Vernon, WA 98273

New data from the Census Bureau show that the nation s immigrant population (legal and illegal), also

Salvadorans. imagine all the people. Salvadorans in Boston

The Impact of Age in the Acculturation of Latin American Immigrants to the U.S.

Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey

About the California Policy Seminar and Funding for This Project

South Americans Chinese

Hispanics, Immigration and the Nation s Changing Demographics

Backgrounder. Immigrants in the United States, 2007 A Profile of America s Foreign-Born Population. Center for Immigration Studies November 2007

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

US Undocumented Population Drops Below 11 Million in 2014, with Continued Declines in the Mexican Undocumented Population

Indian Migration to the Global North in the Americas: The United States

Latinos in the Northeastern United States: Trends and Patterns

How Have Hispanics Fared in the Jobless Recovery?

Race, Ethnicity, and Economic Outcomes in New Mexico

Needs and Challenges for. Race/Ethnicity Data

The 2018 Mid-Term Election: Estimated Voter Participation Rates by Race and Age in Arizona, Florida, Georgia and Texas

NCRCRD. Trends in North Central Latino Demographics. North Central Regional Center for Rural Development. Policy BRIEF

EMBARGOED UNTIL THURSDAY 9/5 AT 12:01 AM

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

Being Latino-American: Experience of Discrimination and Oppression. Ashley O Donnell CNGC 529 Dr. Rawlins Summer Session I 2013

Racial Inequities in Montgomery County

Attitudes toward Immigration: Findings from the Chicago- Area Survey

MIGRATION & HEALTH: MEXICAN IMMIGRANT WOMEN IN THE U.S.

Immigration by the Numbers

Remittances and the Dominican Republic Survey of Recipients in the Dominican Republic Survey of Senders in the United States

People. Population size and growth. Components of population change

Introduction. Background

Characteristics of Poverty in Minnesota

The Dynamics of Low Wage Work in Metropolitan America. October 10, For Discussion only

Antolin M. Llorente. This chapter is largely based on previous work by the author, most notably Llorente et al., 1999, 2000.

The Hispanic white wage gap has remained wide and relatively steady

Why disaggregate data on U.S. children by immigrant status? Some lessons from the diversitydatakids.org project

LATINOS IN MERCER COUNTY

Transcription:

Peruvians in the United States 1980 2008 Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies Graduate Center City University of New York 365 Fifth Avenue Room 5419 New York, New York 10016 212-817-8438 Laird W. Bergad Director Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies clacls@gc.cuny.edu http://web.gc.cuny.edu/lastudies Latino Data Project - Report 35 - October 2010

The Center for Latin American, Caribbean and Latino Studies is a research institute that works for the advancement of the study of Latin America, the Caribbean, and Latinos in the United States in the doctoral programs at the CUNY Graduate Center. One of its major priorities is to provide funding and research opportunities to Latino students at the Ph.D. level. The Center established and helps administer an interdisciplinary specialization in Latin American, Caribbean and Latino Studies in the Masters of Arts in Liberal Studies program. The Latino Data Project was developed with the goal of making information available on the dynamically growing Latino population of the United States and especially New York City through the analysis of extant data available from a variety of sources such as the U.S. Census Bureau, the National Institute for Health, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and state and local-level data sources. All Latino Data Project reports are available at http://web.gc.cuny.edu/lastudies/ For additional information you may contact the Center at 212-817-8438 or by e- mail at clacls@gc.cuny.edu. Staff: Laird W. Bergad, Distinguished Professor, Latin American and Puerto Rican Studies, Lehman College, Ph.D. Program in History, Executive Director, CLACLS Teresita Levy. Assistant Professor, Latin American and Puerto Rican Studies, Lehman College, Associate Director Carolina Barrera-Tobón, Administrative Director Victoria Stone-Cadena, Director of Special Projects Laura Limonic, Director of Quantitative Research Marcela González, Research Associate Copyright @ 2010 Center for Latin American, Caribbean and Latino Studies Room 5419 Graduate Center City University of New York 365 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10016 212-817-8438 clacls@gc.cuny.edu http://web.gc.cuny.edu/lastudies

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 3 Table of Contents Figures...5 Tables..6 Demography..7 Income.13 Poverty.16 Education.19 Employment and Unemployment.24 English Language Abilities.27 Citizenship.30 Race..31 Marriage Patterns...35 Summary..37

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 4 Figures 1. Peruvian Population of the United States, 1940-2008..7 2. Estimates of Peruvian Migration to the United States by Decade, 1950-2008..8 3. Birthplace of Peruvian Population of the United States, 1980-2008..9 4. Percentage of Peruvian Population of the United States, Living in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, 1980-2008..9 5. Percentage of Peruvian Population of the United States Living in Florida, California, New Jersey, New York, and Texas, 1980 2008. 10 6. Sex Distribution of Peruvian Population of the United States by Nativity, 2008 11 7. Age Pyramid Peruvian Domestic-Born Population, 2008..12 8. Age Pyramid Peruvian Foreign-Born Population, 2008. 12 9. Age Pyramid Total Peruvian Population, 2008 13 10. Median Household Income Among Peruvians, 1980-2008 14 11. Median Household Income of Peruvians Compared with other Race/Ethnic Groups And Largest Latino National Subgroups. 2008..14 12. Percentage of Peruvian Households Earning Less than $20,000, More than $75,000, And More than $100,000, 1980 2008.15 13. Percentage of Total Household Income Controlled by Peruvian Households Earning More than $75,000, and more than $100,000, 1980-2008.15 14. Percentage of Peruvians living in Poverty compared with other Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008..17 15. Percentage of Peruvians Living in Poverty by Nativity, 1980-2008.....18 16. Percentage of Peruvians Living in Poverty by Sex, 1980-2008.18 17. Percentage of Peruvians who did not Graduate High School or Achieved a B.A. Degree or Higher by Sex, Population 25 Years of Age or Older, 1980-2008 20 18. Percentage of Peruvians who did not Graduate High School or Achieved a B.A. Degree or Higher by Nativity and Sex for Population 25 Years of Age and Older, 1980-2008....21 19. Percentage of Peruvians who did not Graduate High School or Achieved a B.A. Degree or Higher Compared with Major Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008.22 20. Median Household Income by Educational Attainment Level Among Peruvians in the United States, 2008.23 21. Employment and Unemployment among Peruvians in the United States, 1980-2008 Population Ages 16-60..24 22. Employment Rates for Peruvians by Sex and Nativity, 1980-2008 Population Ages 16-60..25 23. Employment Rates among Peruvians in the United States compared with Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008..26 24. Unemployment Rates among Peruvians in the United States compared with Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008..26 25. Not in the Labor Force Rates among Peruvians in the United States compared with Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008..27 26. English Language Abilities among Peruvians in the United States,1980-2008..28 27. English Language Abilities among Foreign-Born Peruvians in the United States, 1980-2008.28

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 5 28. Language Spoken at Home by Peruvians in the United States,1980-2008.29 29. Percentage of Peruvians who Spoke Spanish at Home in the United States by Nativity, 1980 2008....29 30. Citizenship Status for Peruvians in the United States, 1980-2008..30 31. Racial Self-Declarations among Peruvians in the United States,1980-2008.32 32. Peruvians in the United States who Self Declared as White by Nativity, 1980-2008.32 33. Peruvians in the United States who Self Declared as "Some Other Race" by Nativity 1980 2008...33 34. Median Household Income by Race Among Peruvians in the United States, 2008....33 35. Percentage of Peruvians Living in Poverty by Race, 2008. 34 36. Percentage of Peruvians Ages 25 and Over with a B.A. Degree or Higher by Race, 2008..34 37. Percentage of Peruvian Household Heads Married to Other Peruvians by Sex, 1980 2008...35 38. Percentage of Peruvian Household Heads Married to Latinos who were not Peruvians By Sex, 1980 2008....36 39. Percentage of Peruvian Household Heads Married to Latinos including Peruvians By Sex, 1980 2008..36 40. Percentage of Peruvian Household Heads Married to Non-Hispanic Whites by Sex. 1980 2008.37 Tables 1. Peruvian Population by Largest States of Settlement, 1980 2008...10 2. Household Income Structure among Peruvian Households, 1980 2008..16

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 6 Demography The Peruvian population of the United States increased steadily between 1980 and 2008. The U.S. Census Bureau estimated that there were a little over 70,000 Peruvians living in the U.S. in 1980 and over 550,000 in 2008. 1 (See figure 1). Migration from Peru increased in each decade and there are no indications that migration has slowed or will diminish in the future. More Peruvian migrants arrived after 2000 than during the 1980s or 1990s. (See figure 2). Figure 1 Peruvian Population of the United States, 1940-2008 600 551,233 500 Thousands 400 300 352,800 200 183,346 100 0 70,385 1,822 5,174 10,070 22,319 1940 1950 1960 1970 1 Unless otherwise noted all data in this report were derived from the U.S. Census Bureau, Public Use Microdata Samples for the national censuses of 1900, through 2000 and the American Community Survey 2008 as organized and made available by Steven Ruggles, Matthew Sobek, Trent Alexander, Catherine A. Fitch, Ronald Goeken, Patricia Kelly Hall, Miriam King, and Chad Ronnander. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 4.0 [Machine-readable database].

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 7 Figure 2 Estimates of Peruvian Migration to the United States by Decade, 1950-2008 150 143,352 117,208 Thousands 100 82,837 50 33,913 0 5,823 17,969 1950-59 1960-69 1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-08 Although the number of Peruvians who were born in the United States increased steadily in absolute numbers, ongoing migration from Peru meant that the Peruvian-born percentage of all Peruvians did not decline significantly between 1980 and 2008. In 1980 about 78% of the total Peruvian population was born in Peru; by 2008 this had declined slightly to 73%. (See figure 3). Since there are no indications of a waning of migration from Peru, and it may be anticipated that the number of Peruvian migrants will continue to increase in the future, it is likely that the overwhelming demographic predominance of the foreign-born will continue among the Peruvian population of the U.S. Between 1980 and 2008 the settlement patterns of Peruvians in the United States changed significantly. In 1980 about 38% of all Peruvians in the United States lived in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, but this declined gradually to 2008 when nearly 28% were living in these three states. (See figure 4). Over the same period the proportion of all Peruvians living in California, which was 28% in 1980, fell to 17% in 2008. Florida experienced the largest increase, from 9% of the total Peruvian population in 1980 to 19% in 2008. (See figure 5 and table 1 for these data). The sex distribution of Peruvians continued to be fairly equitable, especially among immigrants to the U.S. There was near parity, of course, in the ratio of males to females among domestic-born Peruvians in 2008. About 53% of all foreign-born Peruvians living in the U.S. were females, 47% were males. This indicates that migration from Peru was fairly balanced by sex and these data also suggest that family migration may have been an important part of the migratory process. (See figure 6).

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 8 9 Figure 3 Birthplace of Peruvian Population of the United States, 1980-2008 8 77.7% 77.7% 76.4% 72.8% 7 6 5 4 3 2 22.3% 22.3% 23.6% 27.2% 1 1980 1990 2000 2008 Born in U.S. Born in Peru Figure 4 Percentage of Peruvian Population of the United States Living in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, 1980-2008 4 38.3% 34.7% 33.6% 3 27.9% 2 1

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 9 Table 1 Peruvian Population by Largest States of Settlement, 1980-2008 (in order of largest concentrations in 2008) State Population % of Total Population % of Total Population % of Total Population % of Total Florida 5,982 8.5% 26,762 14.6% 64,969 18.4% 107,094 19.4% California 19,873 28.2% 47,599 26.0% 71,042 20.1% 93,571 17.0% New Jersey 7,510 10.7% 24,901 13.6% 54,429 15.4% 70,767 12.8% New York 17,286 24.6% 34,028 18.6% 56,675 16.1% 67,976 12.3% Texas 2,581 3.7% 6,801 3.7% 12,499 3.5% 29,563 5.4% Virginia 2,340 3.3% 5,607 3.1% 16,236 4.6% 28,662 5.2% Connecticut 2,180 3.1% 4,721 2.6% 7,521 2.1% 14,976 2.7% Maryland 1,561 2.2% 5,705 3.1% 11,144 3.2% 14,270 2.6% Illinois 2,920 4.1% 5,703 3.1% 7,760 2.2% 14,016 2.5% Georgia 605 0.9% 1,679 0.9% 4,611 1.3% 13,042 2.4% Massachusetts 720 1.0% 3,365 1.8% 4,216 1.2% 11,023 2.0% Others 6,827 9.7% 16,475 9.0% 41,698 11.8% 86,273 15.7% Total 70,385 10 183,346 10 352,800 10 551,233 10 Figure 5 Percentage of Peruvian Population of the United States Living in Florida, California, New Jersey, New York, and Texas, 1980-2008 8.5% Florida 14.6% 18.4% 19.4% 28.2% California 17.0% 20.1% 26.0% 10.7% New Jersey 12.8% 13.6% 15.4% 24.6% New York 12.3% 16.1% 18.6% Texas 3.7% 3.7% 3.5% 5.4% 5.0% 1 15.0% 2 25.0% 3

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 10 6 Figure 6 Sex Distribution of Peruvian Population of the United States by Nativity, 2008 5 49.3% 50.7% 47.3% 52.7% 4 3 2 1 Domestic Born Foreign Born Males Females The age structure of Peruvians born in the U.S. demonstrate the classic patterns of a population with a fairly high birth rate. This was characterized by a heavy concentration of children under the age of 20. Close to 70% of all domestic-born Peruvians were 19 years of age and under in 2008. (See figure 7). The foreign-born Peruvian population had a heavy concentration of people, both males and females, in the working-age categories. Close to 54% of all foreign-born Peruvians living in the U.S. in 2008 were between 20 and 49 years of age. (See figure 8). Because of the fact that nearly three-quarters of all Peruvians in the U.S. were foreign-born in 2008, there was a clustering of the total Peruvian population in the working age categories as indicated in figure 9.

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 11 Figure 7 Age Pyramid Peruvian Domestic-Born Population, 2008 (in percentages of total population) 80-89 70-79 60-69 50-59 40-49 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 2.5 0.1 0.5 0.5 1.4 2.6 30-39 5.1 4.3 20-29 6.1 7.1 10-19 15.0 14.5 0-9 19.3 20.1 Males = 73,768 Females = 75,772 Males Females Figure 8 Age Pyramid Peruvian Foreign-Born Population, 2008 (in percentages of total population) 90-99 80-89 0.6 0.1 0.4 1.3 70-79 2.7 3.2 60-69 4.4 5.3 50-59 8.1 9.7 40-49 9.9 12.6 30-39 7.7 10.9 20-29 5.5 7.0 0-10 4.5 4.2 0-9 1.2 0.8 Males = 189,728 Females = 211,690 Males Females

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 12 Figure 9 Age Pyramid Total Peruvian Population, 2008 (in percentages of total population) 90-99 80-89 0.5 0.1 0.3 1.0 70-79 2.0 2.5 60-69 3.3 4.0 50-59 6.1 7.5 40-49 7.9 9.9 30-39 7.0 9.1 20-29 5.7 7.0 0-10 7.3 6.9 0-9 6.0 6.0 Males = 263,496 Females = 287,662 Males Females Income The median household incomes of Peruvians in the United States increased steadily between 1980 and 2008 (in inflation-adjusted dollars), although there was stagnation and a slight decline between 2000 and 2008 which may have been linked to the U.S. economic downturn after 2006. However, Peruvian median household income in 2008 was among the highest among the most numerous Latino national subgroups in the U.S. and was only surpassed by Asians, non-hispanic whites, and Colombians. (See figures 10 and 11). There is evidence of increasing prosperity among Peruvian households in the U.S. First, the percentage of households in the poorest socioeconomic strata, those earning under $20,000 annually, declined from 12% to 8% of all households between 1980 and 2008. Second, the percentage of all Peruvian households earning over $75,000 yearly rose from 26% in 1980 to nearly 40% in 2008. Finally, at the highest income-earning levels, Peruvian households earning more than $100,000 annually increased from 13% of all households in 1980 to 26% in 2008. (See figure 12). As was the case with other race/ethnic groups and Latino national subgroups in the United States, there was an increasing concentration of income among the wealthiest Peruvian households between 1980 and 2008. Households earning more than $75,000 controlled about half of all income derived by all Peruvian households in 1980, but this increased to 70% of all income in 2008. Peruvian households earning more than $100,000 controlled 31% of all income in 1980 and 56% in 2008. Again, this progressive concentration of wealth was not unique to Peruvians, but a generalized phenomenon within U.S. society. (See figure 13 and table 2 for complete data).

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 13 Figure 10 Median Household Income Among Peruvians, 1980-2008 (in inflation adjusted 2008 dollars) $60 $58,354 $63,240 $62,478 $50 $51,613 Thousands $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 Figure 11 Median Household Income of Peruvians Compared with other Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008 Asians $85,137 NH Whites Colombians Peruvians Ecuadorians Cubans $69,250 $63,140 $62,478 $61,511 $60,085 Salvadorans Puerto Ricans Guatemalans Mexicans Dominicans NH Blacks $52,956 $50,919 $50,919 $48,883 $45,420 $44,402 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 Thousands

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 14 Figure 12 Percentage of Peruvian Households Earning Less than $20,000, More than $75,000, More than $100,000, 1980-2008 (in inflation adjusted 2008 dollars) 4 39.2% 39.6% 35.9% 3 26.0% 23.4% 25.8% 2 20.4% 1 12.1% 10.1% 8.8% 7.9% 13.0% Less than $20,000 More than $75,000 More than $100,000 Figure 13 Percentage of Total Household Income Controlled by Peruvian Households Earning More than $75,000, and more than $100,000, 1980-2008 (in inflation adjusted 2008 dollars) 7 63.7% 66.8% 69.8% 6 55.5% 5 49.5% 45.2% 49.4% 4 3 30.5% 2 1 More than $75,000 More than $100,000

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 15 Table 2 Household Income Structure Among Peruvian Households, 1980-2008 (in inflation adjusted 2008 dollars) % of Income % of Households % of Income % of Households % of Income % of Households % of Income % of Households Less than 10,000 0.4% 4.1% 0.3% 3.5% 0.2% 2.6% 0.2% 2.2% 10,000-19,999 2.0% 7.9% 1.4% 6.6% 1.2% 6.2% 1.0% 5.7% 20,000-29,999 5.6% 13.1% 3.4% 9.7% 2.5% 7.7% 2.7% 9.0% 30,000-39,999 7.4% 12.4% 5.3% 10.9% 4.3% 9.7% 4.7% 11.4% 40,000-49,999 8.4% 11.0% 6.7% 10.9% 6.2% 10.8% 4.7% 8.9% 50,000-74,999 26.6% 25.4% 19.2% 22.6% 18.8% 23.9% 17.0% 23.2% 75,000-99,999 19.0% 13.0% 18.5% 15.5% 17.4% 15.9% 14.2% 13.8% 100,000-199,999 30.5% 13.0% 30.2% 16.7% 32.2% 19.1% 31.4% 19.9% 200,000+ 15.0% 3.7% 17.2% 4.3% 24.1% 6.0% Total 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Poverty The Peruvian population of the United States not only had relatively high median household incomes, but in comparative perspective Peruvians also had the lowest poverty rates among all other racial/ethnic groups and Latino national subgroups in the U.S. The poverty rate was about 10% of the total Peruvian population in 2008, which was exactly the same as the poverty rate for non- Hispanic whites. (See figure 14). These poverty rates declined steadily between 1980 and 2008 for both foreign and domesticborn Peruvians and by sex. The overall poverty rate for all Peruvians in 1980 was 14% and in 2008 it was 10.3%. (See figure 15). Peruvian women had slightly higher poverty rates (11.3%) than Peruvian men (9%) in 2008, although this represented a decline for both sexes from 1980. These data are found in figure 16.

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 16 Figure 14 Percentage of Peruvians living in Poverty compared with other Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008 NH Blacks 27.5% Puerto Ricans 24.9% Dominicans 24.2% Mexicans 23.5% Guatemalans 21.4% Salvadorans 16.6% Cubans 15.1% Colombians 11.9% Asians 11.0% NH Whites 10.3% Peruvians 10.3% 5.0% 1 15.0% 2 25.0% 3

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 17 Figure 15 Percentage of Peruvians Living in Poverty by Nativity, 1980-2008 (in inflation adjusted 2008 dollars) 15.0% 14.6% 14.3% 12.4% 11.9% 12.0% 14.0% 13.4% 12.3% 1 10.2% 10.4% 10.5% 10.3% 5.0% Foreign Born Domestic Born Total Figure 16 Percentage of Peruvians Living in Poverty by Sex, 1980-2008 (in inflation adjusted 2008 dollars) 15.0% 1 12.8% 11.6% 11.0% 9.0% 15.4% 15.0% 13.5% 11.3% 13.9% 13.6% 12.3% 10.3% 5.0% Males Females Total

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 18 Education Peruvian adults living in the U.S., whether domestic or foreign-born, male or female, had extraordinarily high levels of educational attainment in 2008 and there had been constant improvements since 1980. Among all Peruvians 25 years of age and older, about 23% had not graduated high school in 1980, but this dropped to 11% by 2008, one of the lowest non-high school graduation rates in the United States. Over the same period of time the college graduation rate increased impressively from 20% of all adult Peruvians in 1980 to 32% in 2008 which was a higher college graduation rate than found among non-hispanic whites, and third in rank order behind Asians and Colombians. Among domestic-born Peruvian men and women the college graduation rate was higher than among any other racial and ethnic group in the United States. In 2008 an astounding 52% of domestic-born Peruvian women 25 years of age and older had graduated from college with B.A. degrees and the corresponding figure for domestic-born males was 42%. Clearly, acquiring a college education is a major priority among the Peruvian population of the United States. These data are summarized in figures 17 through 19. As was the case among all other demographic groups in the United States, median household income was closely tied to educational attainment levels. It has been pointed out that Peruvians had relatively high median household incomes in the U.S. and this is clearly because of the extraordinarily impressive educational attainment levels which have been achieved by Peruvians between 1980 and 2008. (See figure 20 for 2008 data).

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 19 Figure 17 Percentage of Peruvians who did not Graduate High School or Achieved a B.A. Degree or Higher by Sex, Population 25 Years of Age or Older, 1980-2008 3 2 19.1% 19.3% 18.6% Did not Graduate High School 27.3% 23.4% 23.3% 21.4% 19.9% 19.3% 1 9.9% 11.5% 10.8% 4 3 Males Females Total B.A. Degree or Higher 34.9% 29.5% 31.9% 2 24.8% 24.8% 25.3% 16.6% 15.7% 22.2% 20.2% 20.6% 23.7% 1 Males Females Total

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 20 Figure 18 Percentage of Peruvians who did not Graduate High School or Achieved a B.A. Degree or Higher by Nativity and Sex for Population 25 Years of Age and Older, 1980-2008 3 27.8% Did not Graduate High School 23.9% 23.5% 2 19.6% 18.9% 19.2% 20.9% 1 10.4% 12.1% 14.7% 10.8% 5.7% 13.7% 11.4% 7.8% 4.7% Foreign-Born Males Domestic-Born Males Foreign-Born Females Domestic-Born Females 5 52.0% 4 3 2 34.1% 24.9% 24.3% 24.2% 15.4% 15.6% B.A. Degree or Higher 41.8% 39.4% 39.3% 35.1% 34.1% 27.4% 23.5% 22.9% 20.9% 1 Foreign-Born Males Domestic-Born Males Foreign-Born Females Domestic-Born Females

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 21 Figure 19 Percentage of Peruvians who did not Graduate High School or Achieved a B.A. Degree or Higher Compared with Major Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008 Guatemalans Salvadorans Mexicans Dominicans Puerto Ricans Cubans NH Blacks Colombians Asians Peruvians NH Whites 14.9% 14.0% 10.8% 9.9% 43.5% 35.1% 25.3% 22.7% 20.4% Did not Graduate High School 51.1% 51.0% Asians Colombians Peruvians NH Whites Cubans Puerto Ricans NH Blacks Dominicans Guatemalans Mexicans Salvadorans 18.6% 18.1% 16.9% 10.6% 10.4% 9.5% 33.7% 31.9% 30.7% 27.4% B.A. Degree or Higher 50.9%

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 22 $100 Figure 20 Median Household Income by Educational Attainment Level Among Peruvians in the United States, 2008 $80 $79,434 Thousands $60 $40 $46,642 $54,229 $59,067 Some college no degree $65,686 Associates degree B.A. degree or higher $20 Did not graduate high school High school graduate $0

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 23 Employment and Unemployment Peruvians in the U.S. between 16 and 60 years of age had very low unemployment rates in 2008 4.6% which was a decline from 6% in 1980. Unemployment rates only measure individuals who are actively seeking work. Two other useful measures of labor market conditions should be examined: the employment rate and the not-in-the-labor force rate, which means those who were not actively seeking employment for whatever reason. The employment rate for all Peruvians aged 16 60 was 68% in 1980 and this rose to 77% by 2008. Over the same period the not in the labor force rate fell from 26% to 19%. (See figure 21). Clearly Peruvians in the U.S. became more progressively integrated into the work force as more immigrants arrived after 1980 with the objective of seeking employment. Figure 21 Employment and Unemployment among Peruvians in the United States, 1980-2008 Population Ages 16-60 8 7 76.7% 72.3% 68.3% 66.4% 6 5 4 3 2 1 29.1% 25.7% 21.7% 18.7% 6.0% 6.0% 4.5% 4.6% Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 24 There were some differences in labor market conditions by nativity and sex. Foreign-born Peruvian males between ages 16 60 had much higher employment rates than domestic-born men in the same age categories in all years between 1980 and 2008. This is consistent with the observation that migrants came to the U.S. with the objective of seeking employment. By 2008 86% of all men of working ages born in Peru were working compared with 70% among U.S.-born Peruvian males. The differential among women was not as great: some 72% of Peruvian-born women were employed in 2008 compared with 70% of Peruvian women between ages 16 and 60 who were born in the U.S.. (See figure 22). In 2008 Peruvian employment rates were the highest in comparative perspective when measured against all other race/ethnic groups in the United States and among the major Latino national subgroups in the nation. (See figure 23). The Peruvian population also had one of the lowest unemployment rates and not in the labor force rates. (See figures 24 and 25). Figure 22 Employment Rates for Peruvians by Sex and Nativity, 1980-2008 Population Ages 16-60 10 8 6 83.7% 83.7% 73.4% 85.6% 62.7% 70.1% 70.9% 70.4% 54.8% 62.1% 59.5% 72.0% 53.2% 64.8% 65.0% 69.7% 4 2 Foreign-Born Males Foreign-Born Females Domestic-Born Males Domestic-Born Females

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 25 Figure 23 Employment Rates among Peruvians in the United States compared with Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008 (Population Ages 16-60) Peruvians Salvadorans NH Whites Colombians Guatemalans Cubans Asians Mexicans Dominicans Puerto Ricans NH Blacks 76.7% 76.6% 74.8% 74.3% 74.0% 72.2% 71.6% 68.8% 67.6% 64.5% 63.1% 2 4 6 8 Figure 24 Unemployment Rates among Peruvians in the United States compared with Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008 (Population Ages 16-60) NH Blacks 8.6% Dominicans Puerto Ricans 7.2% 7.1% Guatemalans Cubans Mexicans Colombians Salvadorans Peruvians NH Whites Asians 5.6% 5.5% 5.5% 5.4% 5.2% 4.6% 4.3% 3.9% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0%

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 26 Figure 25 Not in the Labor Force Rates among Peruvians in the United States compared with Race/Ethnic Groups and Largest Latino National Subgroups, 2008 (Population Ages 16-60) Puerto Ricans NH Blacks Mexicans Dominicans Asians Cubans NH Whites Guatemalans Colombians Peruvians Salvadorans 28.4% 28.3% 25.7% 25.1% 24.5% 22.3% 21.0% 20.5% 20.3% 18.7% 18.3% English Language Abilities 1 2 3 Whether foreign or domestic-born, Peruvians demonstrated very competent English language abilities, and this is consistent with the high educational attainment levels found among the Peruvian population of the U.S. Even in 1980, some 80% of all Peruvians in the U.S. reported speaking English exclusively, very well, or well. This rose slightly to 82% in 2008. (See figure 26). As to be expected nearly all Peruvians born and raised in the U.S. had nearly complete English competence. But it is impressive that there were very high rates of English language proficiency among foreignborn Peruvians as well. In 1980 about 76% of all foreign-born Peruvians reported good Englishlanguage abilities, and this was about the same in 2008 at 77%. (See figure 27). Yet, bilingualism was an important part of Peruvian culture in the U.S. as the dominant language spoken at home was Spanish, although there were expected differences between the domestic and foreign born. In 2008 about 85% of all Peruvians spoke Spanish at home. The rate was 93% among the foreign-born. It is important to note the growth of a domestic-born Peruvian culture in the U.S. between 1980 and 2008 with changing linguistic preferences. In 1980 about 70% of all domesticborn Peruvians spoke Spanish at home, as they in all likelihood lived with their Spanish-speaking parents. By 2008 however, this figure had fallen to 59%. Thus, although Spanish was still the dominant language spoken at home even by domestic-born Peruvians, there was an increasing tendency to speak English at home (41% of all domestic-born Peruvians). These data are summarized in figures 28 and 29.

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 27 Figure 26 English Language Abilities among Peruvians in the United States,1980-2008 Population Ages 5 and Older 9 8 79.5% 76.2% 75.8% 81.8% 7 6 5 4 3 2 20.5% 23.8% 24.2% 18.2% 1 Speaks English Exclusively, Very Well, or Well Does not Speak English or Does not Speak Well Figure 27 English Language Abilities among Foreign-Born Peruvians in the United States,1980-2008 Population Ages 5 and Older 8 7 76.3% 72.4% 70.9% 77.0% 6 5 4 3 2 23.7% 27.6% 29.1% 23.0% 1 Speaks English Exclusively, Very Well, or Well Does not Speak English or Does not Speak Well

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 28 Figure 28 Language Spoken at Home by Peruvians in the United States,1980-2008 Population Ages 5 and Older 10 8 89.7% 90.5% 89.8% 85.2% 6 4 2 10.3% 9.5% 10.2% 14.8% English Spanish Figure 29 Percentage of Peruvians who Spoke Spanish at Home in the United States by Nativity, 1980-2008 (Population Ages 5 and Older) 10 93.5% 94.9% 94.2% 92.9% 8 70.4% 68.4% 71.2% 6 58.6% 4 2 Domestic Born Foreign Born

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 29 Citizenship Because of naturalization among foreign-born Peruvians, the citizenship rate increased significantly between 1980 and 2008. In 1980 about 55% of all Peruvians in the U.S. were not citizens and only 21% were naturalized. By 2008 nearly 62% of the Peruvian population were citizens of the U.S. About 29% were domestic-born and 32% were naturalized. (See figure 30). Figure 30 Citizenship Status for Peruvians in the United States, 1980-2008 6 54.9% 55.5% 5 47.3% 4 38.5% 3 2 24.2% 25.2% 24.9% 29.2% 20.9% 19.3% 27.8% 32.3% 1 U.S. Citizen by Birth Naturalized Citizen Not a Citizen

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 30 Race The issue of race is a complex one for Latin American and Caribbean-origin populations in the United States because of different racial conceptualizations compared with the black/white dualism which has long been present in the United States. This is very different from the complex patterns of race mixture in the region in which there are a multiplicity of racial classifications, rather than the simplistic two-pole concept prevalent in the U.S. The issue is further complicated by the way in which data are gathered on race by the U.S. Census Bureau, which fundamentally is based on selfdeclaration rather than actual skin color or any other objective criteria. Racial self-declarations may have little to do with actual racial realities, but rather peoples perceptions of themselves. These issues are further complicated by erroneous notions that the term Hispanic or Latino represents a race, which they do not. Nevertheless, since the Census Bureau does measure race it is useful to report its findings even if these are more an expression of how people conceive of themselves, rather than an objective observation of skin color or race. Basically, Peruvians have increasingly considered themselves to be Of Some Other Race rather than white as was the case in 1980. Although there have been fluctuations in these self conceptions from census year to census year, it is evident that more and more Peruvians in the U.S. consider themselves not to be white, although the white self-declaration continues to the dominant. In 1980 68% of all Peruvians declared themselves to be white; 31% to be of some other race. By 2008 some 39% considered themselves to be of some other race while 60% self declared as white. Very few Peruvians declared themselves to be black, or of African descent. (See figure 31). There was a greater propensity for Peruvians born in the U.S. to declare themselves as white, although the differential diminished considerably by 2008 when 64% of domestic-born and 59% of foreign-born Peruvians declared themselves to be white. Foreign-born Peruvians also had higher rates of self-declarations as of some other race. (See figures 32 and 33 for these data). Yet race does seem to matter, although marginally, when socioeconomic indicators are examined. Those who self declared as white had higher median household incomes than the other racial categories, although not overwhelmingly so. (See figure 34). Yet, about the same percentage of Peruvians lived in poverty (about 10%) whether they self declared as white or some other race. (See figure 35). Additionally a marginally higher percentage of white Peruvians graduated college (33%) than Peruvians of some other race (30%). It is conspicuous that of Peruvians who self-declared as black only 6.7% reported achieving a B.A. degree or higher in 2008. (See figures 35 and 36).

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 31 Figure 31 Racial Self-Declarations among Peruvians in the United States,1980-2008 7 68.2% 6 57.7% 60.3% 5 47.8% 51.6% 4 41.1% 39.1% 3 31.3% 2 1 0.5% 1.2% 0.6% 0.6% White SOR Black Note: SOR means "Some Other Race" Figure 32 Peruvians in the United States who Self Declared as White by Nativity, 1980-2008 8 76.5% 7 6 65.7% 62.9% 56.2% 63.6% 59.1% 5 5 47.2% 4 3 2 1 Domestic Born Foreign Born

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 32 6 Figure 33 Peruvians in the United States who Self Declared as "Some Other Race" by Nativity 1980-2008 5 49.5% 52.3% 4 33.6% 35.5% 42.8% 35.4% 40.4% 3 23.3% 2 1 Domestic Born Foreign Born Figure 34 Median Household Income by Race Among Peruvians in the United States, 2008 $70 $60 $64,159 $61,103 $56,011 $50 Thousands $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 White Some other Race Black Note: The sample size for Peruvians who declared themselves to be 'black' is very small making the data not statistically reliable.

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 33 12.0% Figure 35 Percentage of Peruvians Living in Poverty by Race, 2008 1 10.2% 10.5% 8.0% 6.7% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% White Some other Race Black Note: The sample size for Peruvians who declared themselves to be 'black' is very small making the data not statistically reliable. Figure 36 Percentage of Peruvians Ages 25 and Over with a B.A. Degree or Higher by Race, 2008 3 33.2% 30.1% 2 1 6.7% White Some other Race Black Note: The sample size for Peruvians who declared themselves to be 'black' is very small making the data not statistically reliable.

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 34 Marriage Patterns In their marriage patterns Peruvian household heads preferred to marry other Peruvians or other Latinos rather than non-hispanic whites or blacks. Yet, there were important differences by sex. In 2008 about 65% of all Peruvian male household heads were married to other Peruvians while 50% of Peruvian female household heads married other Peruvians. With respect to marrying other Latinos, however, there were few differences. In 2008 about 18% of Peruvian male and 19% of Peruvian female household heads were married to non-peruvian Latinos. The major differential was with respect to marriage patterns by sex to non-hispanic whites. In 2008 16% of Peruvian male household heads were married to non-hispanic whites compared with 31% of Peruvian female household heads. These data are summarized in figures 37 through 40. Figure 37 Percentage of Peruvian Household Heads Married to Other Peruvians by Sex 1980-2008 6 4 64.7% 55.3% 56.3% 45.8% 46.5% 40.8% 49.8% 60.6% 54.7% 54.4% 45.1% 24.1% 2 Males Females Total

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 35 Figure 38 Percentage of Peruvian Household Heads Married to Latinos who were not Peruvians by Sex, 1980-2008 3 26.8% 27.7% 26.6% 2 23.3% 22.0% 17.8% 20.7% 19.3% 21.8% 23.8% 18.5% 18.0% 1 Males Females Total Figure 39 Percentage of Peruvian Household Heads Married to Latinos including Peruvians by Sex, 1980-2008 8 82.5% 79.6% 77.3% 72.7% 68.4% 68.3% 65.8% 78.2% 78.6% 76.5% 71.7% 6 44.8% 4 2 Males Females Total

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 36 Figure 40 Percentage of Peruvian Household Heads Married to Non-Hispanic Whites by Sex, 1980-2008 5 48.3% 4 3 25.6% 32.5% 29.6% 30.7% 26.4% 2 20.9% 18.4% 16.0% 21.7% 19.8% 2 1 Males Females Total Summary The Peruvian population of the U.S. increased dramatically between 1980 and 2008 from about 70,000 to over 550,000 people. Migration increased in each decade and there is no reason to believe that migration from Peru will decrease in the near future. Because of this continued migration the foreign-born sector of the Peruvian population has not diminished proportionally, despite the increase in the U.S.-born population of Peruvian origin in absolute numbers. The percentage of Peruvians living in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut has decreased between 1980 and 2008. Peruvians living in California have also decreased in relative terms, while Florida has become a major state of Peruvian settlement. Peruvians have relatively high median household incomes compared with other race/ethnic groups in the U.S. and other Latino national subgroups. These incomes have improved since 1980 in inflation-adjusted dollars.

Peruvians in the United States, 1980 2008 37 While income remains very concentrated among wealthier Peruvian households, the percentage of high-income earning Peruvian households has increased substantially between 1980 and 2008. Peruvians have the lowest poverty rates in the U.S. when compared with other race/ethnic groups and other Latino nationalities. The previously noted favorable socioeconomic indicators median household income and poverty are linked to the extraordinarily impressive educational attainment accomplishments of the adult Peruvian population. A greater percentage of adult Peruvians had graduated college than non-hispanic whites in 2008. Peruvians of working age demonstrated very low unemployment rates, very low not in the labor force rates, and very high labor participation rates. A large portion of the Peruvian population, both domestic and foreign-born, demonstrated high levels of English-language proficiency. Nevertheless, Spanish was the dominant language spoken at home. Over time since 1980 more Peruvians who were born abroad became naturalized citizens and the citizenship rate rose continually to 2008. On the complex issue of race, more Peruvians declared themselves to be of some other race in 2008 than in previous census years, although a majority self declared as white. There were no major socioeconomic differences between Peruvians declaring themselves to be white or some other race. A very small percentage of Peruvians self-declared as black. Peruvian household heads preferred to marry other Peruvians, or other Latinos. Nevertheless, domestic-born Peruvian female household heads increasingly married non-hispanic whites.