40609Nicoletti.txt. 7 MR. BRUTOCAO: Nicholas Brutocao appearing. 12 Honor. I'm counsel associated with Steve Krause and

Similar documents
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, )

HAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626

Case 1:04-cv JJF Document Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA XXXX MB

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) Vs. Defendant.

Case 2:08-cv AHM-PJW Document 93 Filed 12/28/09 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1024 1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION 6. MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT 61 BEFORE HON. JOHN S. MEYER, JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv RDB Document Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. Petitioner, ) vs. ) Cause No Defendant.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ISADORE ROSENBERG, REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2011

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT NO.

SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

KRESSE & ASSOCIATES, LLC

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 26 5 vs. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

LARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) VS. ) June 15, ISHMAEL JONES, ) A pen name ) ) Defendant. ) )

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT-CRIMINAL DIVISION

3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY


IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CI-19 UCN: CA015815XXCICI

BY BRIAN KORTE AND SCOTT WORTMAN

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CRIMINAL DIVISION

STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CV WILLIAM TURNER, Plaintiff, vs.

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO.

The Due Process Advocate

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE XXXXXXXXXX JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR XXXXXXXXX COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) /

5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF THURSTON. Plaintiffs, Defendants. COURT'S RULING ON DISCOVERY MOTION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/10/ :31 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/10/2017. Exhibit I

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/08/2016 Page: 1. Re: Supplemental Authority in Fish, et al. v. Kobach, Case No.

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: CACE

Case 2:12-cv WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25. Exhibit C

DEPOSITION OF KRISTA HIGGS BY BRIAN KORTE ESQ

Case 2:11-cr KJM Document 258 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. : Civil Action : No VCL Chancery Courtroom No. 12B

2 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2018

IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case4:10-cv SBA Document81 Filed05/31/11 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

: : : : : : : : : : Defendants

ARROWHEAD CAPITAL FINANCE, LTD., CHEYNE SPECIALTY FINANCE FUND L.P., et al.

Page 5 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 THE COURT: All we have left is Number 5 and 3 then Mr. Stopa's. Are you ready to proceed? 4 MR. SPANOLIOS: Your Honor

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII. Plaintiff, vs. CIVIL NO Defendant.

This is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of

V. CASE NO CA-00669

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. -vs- ) FWV ) ) TRAVIS EARL JONES,

ONTARIO, INC., Appellant, Respondent

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. The above-entitled matter came on for oral

Case 1:12-cr JTN Doc #220 Filed 04/04/13 Page 1 of 20 Page ID#1769. Plaintiff,

CASE NO.: CV Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction -February 5, 2013

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION [NUMBER]

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, ARRAIGNMENT & MOTIONS. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

Case 2:13-cv MEF-TFM Document 10 Filed 11/12/13 Page 1 of 12

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT COURT FOR THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. : Case No. : CA018991XXXX MB. v. :Case No.

Filed 8/ 25/ 16 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 April 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA HEARING Monday, January 26, 2009

The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, et al. v. Brunner, Jennifer, etc.

21 Proceedings reported by Certified Shorthand. 22 Reporter and Machine Shorthand/Computer-Aided

E-FILED: Jun 13, :57 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G-84481

KYLEEN CANE - 12/18/06 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/26/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 109 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FROM THE KORTE WARTMAN LAW FIRM. Page: 1 IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA (AW)

AGREN BLANDO COURT REPORTING & VIDEO INC 1

Case 3:18-cv RS Document Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 139

Case 2:03-cv DGC Document 141 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 1 of 32

Court Reporter: Felicia Rene Zabin, RPR, CCR 478 Federal Certified Realtime Reporter (702)

UNITED STATES DISTRI EASTERN DISTRICT OF 9 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE JOHN-F. MOULDS 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida

David M. Lee, CSR 9543, RMR, CRR

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION. 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al.

CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA. Probable Cause Hearing Motion to Suppress Evidence

Case 2:11-cr KJM Document 142 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. --o0o-- Plaintiff,

18 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONIE M. BRINKEMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Pages 1-15)

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv MHS Document 43 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ORDER

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 4:11-cr JST USA v. Su. Document 193. View Document.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PLAINTIFF,) ) VS. ) NO. SC )

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART X RELIABLE ABSTRACT CO.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CLARA COUNTY HONORABLE AARON PERSKY, JUDGE DEPARTMENT o0o--- PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Transcript of Jones v Scruggs Sanctions Hearing (SF FCA) (2).TXT 5 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAFAYETTE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI 13 JONES, FUNDERBURG,

1. U.S. Department of the Navy s Renewable Energy Program John A. Kliem, Deputy Director (Attachment 1)

Transcription:

1 1 VENTURA, CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2009 2 --o0o-- 3 4 5 THE COURT: Nicoletti versus Metrocities 6 Mortgage. 7 MR. BRUTOCAO: Nicholas Brutocao appearing 8 for the defendant Taylor, Bean and Whitaker. 9 MR. KRAUSE: Steve Krause for plaintiff 10 George Nicoletti. 11 MR. NICOLETTI: George Nicoletti, your 12 Honor. I'm counsel associated with Steve Krause and 13 also the plaintiff. 14 THE COURT: The Court's tentative ruling is 15 to overrule the demurrer to the complaint. 16 Does the defendant wish to be heard? 17 MR. BRUTOCAO: Yes, your Honor. On the 18 matter of the injunctive relief pertaining directly 19 to the declaratory relief and how this issue stands 20 in terms of the code section reference 2923 -- 21 THE COURT:.5. 22 MR. BRUTOCAO: Yes, there's no declaratory 23 relief that can exist with this code section. This 24 is a threshold issue that's really a legal one. And 25 then there's no source or authority in the code as 26 the plaintiff has argued it pertains to the 27 situations. 28 THE COURT: Well -- Page 1

2 1 MR. BRUTOCAO: The plain reading is clear 2 that that's not what the purpose of this code section 3 was established for. It was merely done -- the code 4 section 2922.6, which plaintiff refers to, was 5 enacted as a safe harbor for the servicer against 6 their investor in the event that they would like -- 7 THE COURT: Well, this interpretation of 8 2923.5 is still in case law limbo, in that there's no 9 appellate authority as to the interpretation of this 10 particular Civil Code Section 2923.5. 11 And the Court's conclusion at this time is 12 that this section does require a lending institution 13 to exercise a good faith attempt to avoid 14 foreclosure. And whether or not the defendant 15 engaged in such a good faith effort really involves a 16 factual issue that can't be determined at the 17 pleading stage. 18 So, therefore, it's the Court's conclusion 19 that while this issue needs to be addressed from a 20 factual standpoint, and ultimately we will need 21 appellate authority for guidance in the trial court, 22 at this juncture the Court will overrule the demurrer 23 and -- 24 MR. NICOLETTI: Your Honor, if I may, 25 section 2923.5 sets out the guideline to the notice 26 of default at the notice of sale. 27 MR. BRUTOCAO: Those statutorily were 28 adhered to in this case. The only issue regarding 3 Page 2

1 the intent of this act, legislation is the question 2 if 2923.6. And it's very clear from that section in 3 that it's set out in the very first section 2823.6, 4 section A, that the intent is to help servicers when 5 dealing with a potential lawsuit by their investors, 6 not that it would create a private action for the 7 borrower. 8 Then going back again to 2923.5, that just 9 sets out the requirement of what needs to be 10 contained in the notice of default and the notice of 11 sale, and those were adhered to in this case. 12 THE COURT: All right. Plaintiff wish to be 13 heard? 14 MR. NICOLETTI: Yes, your Honor. The 15 allegations are such that they're factual allegations 16 in the complaint. Number 12A through J, they're all 17 factual allegations to oppose that declaration and to 18 oppose the way that that declaration was made, in 19 both the notice of default, as well as the notice of 20 trustee sale. Basically, it's a factual case, your 21 Honor. And it's basically a case that we don't have 22 any guidance, you're correct, from the appellate 23 court at this time. We'd like to have some guidance, 24 and that's the reason we're here, frankly, on this 25 case. 26 MR. BRUTOCAO: Your Honor, with all due 27 respect to the plaintiff, as it's set out in 2923.5, 28 what it precisely required by the legislation was 4 Page 3

1 contained in all the necessary documents. The only 2 question which plaintiff can make in terms of what's 3 been their interpretation, again, the 2923.6. Just 4 by reading that section, you can see that in and of 5 itself it applies by the way it's set up to the 6 interaction of servicers and their investors. 7 There's nothing -- the fact that now 8 borrowers have the ability to mandate that all 9 servicers and money institutions are now required to 10 enter into contracts for loan modifications. 11 THE COURT: Well, at this juncture in this 12 case the Court holds that section 2923.6 was the 13 legislature's attempt to deal with a collapsing 14 mortgage industry, and also to stabilize the market. 15 And the Court's ruling is to overrule the 16 demurrer. Require the defendant to file an answer on 17 or before April 27, 2009. And at this juncture with 18 regard to the defendant's request to set aside the 19 Lis Pendens, that request is denied without 20 prejudice. 21 Plaintiff to give notice. 22 MR. NICOLETTI: Yes, we will, your Honor. I 23 was wondering, your Honor, with regard to our request 24 for costs on making the demurrer, we have a letter in 25 Exhibit C that we tried to eliminate the demurrer 26 process with counsel. And we told the counsel, 27 Mr. Malcolm, who was on this case previously to 28 Mr. Moncoto(Phonetic, that it would be expensive to 5 1 oppose this demurrer. Page 4

2 We've done a lot of research on it. I 3 actually have the legislative intent service from 4 Woodland that has done the legislative intent on this 5 statute, because we intend to pursue it. And we've 6 spent quite a lot of money in this opposition where 7 we would have liked to have just gone ahead with our 8 case instead of meeting this. 9 We did warn counsel that not only while we 10 did -- we warned him of costs because we stated that 11 we would appeal -- or we would amend our complaint if 12 defense counsel would like us to amend our complaint 13 to the point that it would overcome any demurrer on 14 their side. So we offered to take this demurrer off 15 calendar and we offered that we wouldn't have to 16 appear in front of this Court, and waste the court's 17 time nor waste our own time on this. 18 THE COURT: Well, the Court finds there's a 19 legitimate and unsettled points of law that needs -- 20 or will need to be addressed by the appellate 21 authority. And at this juncture the Court is not 22 going to, in effect, award sanctions against the 23 defendant for proceeding with the demurrer. Whether 24 or not you, the plaintiff, may want to amend your 25 complaint to more -- to a more focused area for 26 ultimate appellate decisions so that you can, quote, 27 take your best shot, closed quote. It's up to you 28 and the defendant to work out. 6 1 But at this point I'm overruling the 2 demurrer. I'm making the order with regard to filing Page 5

3 an answer on or before April 27th. And at this 4 juncture that's all that I'm prepared to do. 5 MR. NICOLETTI: Thank you, your Honor. 6 MR. KRAUSE: Thank you, your Honor. 7 THE COURT: All right. 8 MR. BRUTOCAO: Thank you, your Honor. 9 THE COURT: Thank you. 10 (Proceedings concluded. 11 --o0o-- 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF VENTURA COURTROOM 41 HON. FRED BYSSHE Page 6

GEORGE NICOLETTI, Plaintiff, vs. No. 56-2008-00333790 CU-OR-VTA METROCITIES MORTGAGE, Defendant. REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2009 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff: GEORGE NICOLETTI Attorney at Law ANANDA & KRAUSE BY: STEVEN J. KRAUSE Attorney at Law For Defendant: NICHOLAS A. BRUTOCAO Attorney at Law LISA LEMUS, C.S.R. #11484 Official Reporter 800 South Victoria Avenue Room 313 Ventura, California 93009 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF VENTURA GEORGE NICOLETTI, Plaintiff, Page 7

vs. No. 56-2008-00333790 CU-OR-VTA METROCITIES MORTGAGE, Defendant. I, LISA LEMUS, CSR #11484, Certified Shorthand Reporter of the state of California, for the County of Ventura, do hereby certify that the foregoing pages 1 through 6 are a full, true and correct transcript of the proceedings had in the above-entitled case on April 6, 2009. Dated at Ventura, California, this 9th day of April 2009. LISA LEMUS, CSR #11484 Official Reporter *Please Note: Copies of this transcript are not certified and do not conform with the provisions of Government Code Section 69954(d unless they bear the original signature of Lisa Lemus. Page 8