UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Similar documents
Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 53 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 106 Filed 08/27/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO.

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 84-1 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 26-2 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

STIPULATED ORDER. filed a Complaint for Injunctive Relief on January 29, On May 3, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Defendants/Appellants.

v. No. D-202-CV

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. CV JH/DJS NOTICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 1:15-mc CKK Document 188 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 374 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 9 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SANTA FE COUNTY CLASS ACTION STRIP SEARCH CASE

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. to reach agreement by the end of the business day on March 14 th, and some parties were not

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document Filed 01/17/14 Page 1 of 8. Exhibit C

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Adams, in her Official capacity as Chairman of the Moore BOE, Carolyn M. McDermott, in her Official capacity as Secretary of the Moore BOE; William R.

Docket No. 31,080 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 2008-NMSC-063, 145 N.M. 280, 196 P.3d 1286 November 7, 2008, Filed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Third, it should provide for the orderly admission of evidence.

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 97-5 Filed 11/28/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Case 1:13-cv WYD-MEH Document 28 Filed 02/20/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Prescott Division) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:05-cv FJM

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES REVISED PLAN FOR COMPLIANCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 5:18-cv DAE Document 9 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JOINT PRELIMINARY STATUS REPORT

Case 5:08-cv JLQ -OP Document 75 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:2561

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 11/22/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case Document 1135 Filed in TXSB on 02/07/17 Page 1 of 6

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CELIA VALDEZ, GRACIELA GRAJEDA, ROANNA BEGAY, JESSE RODRIGUEZ, and ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-cv-00668 LAM/DJS MARY HERRERA, in her official capacity as New Mexico Secretary of State, PAMELA S. HYDE in her official capacity as Secretary of New Mexico Human Services Department, FRED SANDOVAL in his official capacity as the Director of the Income Support Division of the New Mexico Human Services Department, CAROLYN INGRAM in her capacity as the Director of the Medical Assistance Division of the New Mexico Human Services Department, RICK HOMANS in his capacity as the Secretary of the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, and MICHAEL SANDOVAL, in his capacity as the Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, Defendants. JOINT STATUS REPORT AND PROVISIONAL DISCOVERY PLAN Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 26(f), a meeting was held on September 2, 2009, via telephone and was attended by: David Urias, Mark Posner, Yolanda Sheffield, Nicole Kovite, and Allison Kierman for Plaintiffs; and 1

Scott Fuqua for Defendant Mary Herrera, Secretary of State; and Adrian Terry and Elaine Lujan for Defendants Pamela S. Hyde in her capacity as Secretary of the New Mexico Human Services Department, Fred Sandoval in his capacity as Director of the Income Support Division of the New Mexico Human Services Department, Carol Ingram in her capacity as the Director of the Medical Assistance Division of the New Mexico Human Services Department, Rick Homans in his capacity as the Secretary of the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, and Michael Sandoval in his capacity as the Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department. NATURE OF THE CASE Plaintiffs allege on-going violations of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 ( NVRA ), including Section 5 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-3, which requires New Mexico to offer voter registration simultaneously with an application for or renewal of a New Mexico motor vehicle driver s license or identification card, and Section 7, 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-5, which requires New Mexico to provide voter registration at public assistance agencies in the State. AMENDMENTS TO PLEADINGS AND JOINDER OF PARTIES Plaintiffs intend to file an amended complaint to add a class action allegation. Plaintiffs should be allowed until October 15, 2009, to amend the pleadings and until October 15, 2009, to join additional parties. Defendants should be allowed until November 6, 2009 to amend the pleadings and November 6, 2009 to join additional parties. 2

STIPULATIONS The parties stipulate and agree that venue is properly laid in this District, and that the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter. The parties further stipulate and agree that the law governing this case is the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 ( NVRA ), 42 U.S.C. 1973gg et seq. The parties will confer regarding stipulations of fact following the close of discovery. PLAINTIFFS CONTENTIONS This litigation has arisen because Defendants are failing to implement Section 5 and Section 7 of the NVRA. New Mexico does not offer simultaneous application for both voter registration and a motor vehicle driver s license or identification card. New Mexico s Human Services Department offices also routinely fail to distribute voter registration applications and provide the other voter registration services required by Section 7 to persons who apply for public assistance, or who submit a recertification, renewal, or change of address form relating to public assistance. DEFENDANTS CONTENTIONS Defendant New Mexico Human Services Department (HSD) contends that it is in compliance with Section 7 of the NVRA. HSD contends that its application for services provides the opportunity for voter registration as required by the NVRA. HSD contends that Plaintiff Begay did not elect to register to vote on her application for assistance. HSD further contends that Plaintiff s admit that HSD clients and customers are provided voter registration applications when they independently asked for the application or checked yes on the voter notice form as required by the NVRA. See Complaint 68. 3

Defendant New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department contends that it is in compliance with Section 5 of the NVRA. Defendant Secretary of State contends that it is compliance with all pertinent provisions of the NVRA. PROVISIONAL DISCOVERY PLAN The parties jointly propose to the Court the following discovery plan: List all witnesses who, at this time, you think will either testify or be deposed, giving their name, title, address and a brief summary of their testimony. It is insufficient to list witnesses addresses, save for clients, in care of counsel. List all documents which you believe, at this time, will be exhibits at the trial. List all experts who you believe, at this time, will testify at the trial, giving their name, address, area of expertise, and a brief summary of the anticipated testimony. or be deposed: Plaintiffs and Defendants expect at this time the following individuals will either testify Name Address Subject of Information Defendant Mary Herrera, New Mexico Secretary of State Don Francisco Trujillo II, New Mexico Deputy Secretary of State Pamela S. Hyde, Secretary of New Mexico Human Services Department Office of the Secretary of State, 325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300, Santa Fe, NM 87503, Office of the Secretary of State, 325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300, Santa Fe, NM 87503, New Mexico Human Services Department Upon information and belief, Ms. Herrera has knowledge concerning New Mexico s compliance with the NVRA and the conduct by state officials that forms the basis of this action. Upon information and belief, Mr. Trujillo II has knowledge concerning New Mexico s compliance with the NVRA and the conduct by state officials that forms the basis of this action. Upon information and belief, Ms. Hyde has knowledge concerning the Human Services Department s compliance with the NVRA. Fred Sandoval, Income Support Division Upon information and belief, Mr. Sandoval 4

Director of the Income Support Division of New Mexico Human Services Department Carolyn Ingram, Director of the Medical Assistance Division of the New Mexico Human Services Department Ted Roth, ISD Deputy Director, HSD Florence Gonzales, ISD Division Coordinator, HSD Vida Tapia-Sanchez, HSD Rick Homans, Secretary of the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department Michael Sandoval, Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department Medical Assistance Division Income Support Division Income Support Division New Mexico Human Services Department Taxation and Revenue Department 1100 South Street Francis Drive P.O. Box 630 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-0630 Taxation and Revenue Department Motor Vehicle Division 1100 South Street Francis Drive P.O. Box 630 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-0630 has knowledge concerning the Human Services Department s compliance with the NVRA. Upon information and belief, Ms. Ingram has knowledge concerning the Human Services Department s compliance with the NVRA. Upon information and belief, Mr. Roth has knowledge concerning the Human Services Department s compliance with the NVRA. Upon information and belief, Ms. Gonzales has knowledge concerning the Human Services Department s compliance with the NVRA. Upon information and belief, Ms. Tapia- Sanchez has knowledge concerning the Human Services Department s compliance with the NVRA. Upon information and belief, Mr. Homans has knowledge concerning the Taxation and Revenue Department s compliance with the NVRA. Upon information and belief, Mr. Sandoval has knowledge concerning the Taxation and Revenue Department s compliance with the NVRA. Raul Alvarez, TRD Taxation and Revenue Department 1100 South Street Francis Drive P.O. Box 630 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-0630 Upon information and belief, Mr. Alvarez has knowledge concerning the Taxation and Revenue Department s compliance with the NVRA. 5

Representative of ACORN C/o David Urias Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A. Albuquerque, N.M. 87102 The representative has knowledge regarding ACORN s voter registration activities during the relevant time period. Celia Valdez Graciela Grajeda C/o David Urias Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A. Albuquerque, N.M. 87102 C/o David Urias Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A. Albuquerque, N.M. 87102 Ms. Valdez has knowledge regarding New Mexico s failure to provide voter registration services at MVD and/or MVD Express. Ms. Grajdea has knowledge regarding New Mexico s failure to provide voter registration services at MVD and/or MVD Express. Jesse Rodriguez C/o David Urias Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A. Albuquerque, N.M. 87102 Mr. Rodriguez has knowledge regarding New Mexico s failure to provide voter registration services at MVD and/or MVD Express. Roanna Begay C/o David Urias Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A. Albuquerque, N.M. 87102 Ms. Begay has knowledge regarding New Mexico s failure to provide voter registration services at Human Services Department s offices. Various Human Services Divisions Employees TBD Upon information and belief, these individuals have knowledge concerning the New Mexico voter registration practices and compliance issues pursuant to the NVRA. Various MVD and MVD Express employees TBD Upon information and belief, these individuals have knowledge concerning the New Mexico voter registration practices and compliance issues pursuant to the NVRA. 6

At this time, neither Plaintiffs nor Defendants can identify specific documents they believe would be exhibits at trial. At this time, neither Plaintiffs nor Defendants can provide the name of an expert they might use at trial. Discovery will be needed on the following subjects: Plaintiffs: The policies, practices, processes, procedures, and forms being used by Defendants for implementing and complying with Section 5 and Section 7 of the NVRA in New Mexico, the number of persons applying to register to vote in New Mexico pursuant to Section 5 and Section 7, and the number of persons eligible to be offered voter registration in New Mexico pursuant to Section 5 and Section 7. By providing this list of subjects, Plaintiffs do not foreclose the possibility that discovery on additional subjects may be necessary. Defendants: Any and all investigations conducted by Project Vote of MVD and MVD Express locations and HSD offices for compliance with the NVRA and any and all interviews conducted by Project Vote of persons leaving HSD offices. Any and all investigations conducted or participated in by ACORN. Any and all contact and communications by and between Plaintiffs and HSD and TRD as related to this action. By providing this list of subjects, Defendants do not foreclose the possibility that discovery on additional subjects may be necessary. Interrogatories: Plaintiffs may serve a maximum of 25 interrogatories on each individual named Defendant. Defendants may serve a maximum of 25 interrogatories on each individual named Plaintiff. The responding party must serve the answers and any objections within 30 days of being served with the interrogatories. 7

Requests for Admission: Plaintiffs may serve a maximum of 40 requests for admission on each named Defendant, excluding requests the purpose of which is to authenticate documents or to lay an evidentiary foundation for admissibility. Defendants may serve a maximum of 40 requests for admission on each named Plaintiff, excluding requests for admissions the purpose of which is to authenticate documents or to lay an evidentiary foundation for admissibility. The responding party must serve the answers and any objections within 30 days of being served with the requests to admit. Number of Depositions: Plaintiffs and Defendants each may take a maximum of 30 depositions, excluding experts and third parties. Depositions should be limited to eight hours for each party and for each individual deposed in a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. All other depositions should be limited to five hours. Expert Reports Under Rule 26(a)(2): Reports from retained experts will be due from Plaintiffs by March 5, 2010, and from Defendants by April 5, 2010. Plaintiffs will be entitled to supplement their report by April 30, 2010. Supplementation under Rule 26(e) is due the first of each month, as necessary. All discovery should commence in time to be completed by April 1, 2010, except for expert discovery which can be taken until April 30, 2010. PRETRIAL MOTIONS Plaintiffs intend to file a Motion for Preliminary Injunction and may file a Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants intend to file a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and may file a Motion for Summary Judgment. 8

ESTIMATED TRIAL TIME The parties cannot estimate at this time how long trial will last in this case. X _ This is a non-jury case. This is a jury case. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE The parties request a pre-trial conference prior to trial. SETTLEMENT The possibility of settlement in this case is uncertain at this time. The parties will request a settlement conference when they believe such a conference may be productive. EXCEPTIONS (Where counsel cannot agree to any recitation herein, exceptions shall be listed.) /s/ John W. Boyd David Urias Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives, P.A. Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-9960 jwb@fbdlaw.com skb@fbdlaw.com PROJECT VOTE Yolanda Sheffield Nicole Kovite Teresa James, Of Counsel 739 8 th Street SE, Suite 202 Washington, DC 20003 Telephone: (202) 543-4173 Ext. 303 Facsimile: (202) 543-3675 Email: ysheffield@projectvote.org Email: nkovite@projectvote.org 9

DLA PIPER US LLP Cynthia A. Ricketts Allison Kierman 2525 East Camelback Road, Suite 1000 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Telephone: (480) 606-5060 Facsimile: (480) 606-5512 Email: cindy.ricketts@dlapiper.com Email: allison.kierman@dlapiper.com DEMOS: A NETWORK OF IDEAS & ACTION Brenda Wright 358 Chestnut Hill Avenue Suite 303 Brighton, MA 02135 Telephone: (617) 232-5885 Ext. 13 Facsimile: (617) 232-7251 Email: bwright@demos.org LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW Jon M. Greenbaum Mark A. Posner 1401 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 662-8389 Facsimile: (202) 628-2858 Email: jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org Email: mposner@lawyerscommittee.org ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE AND REFORM NOW, PC Arthur Z. Schwartz Schwartz, Lichten and Bright, Of Counsel 275 Seventh Avenue Suite 1760 New York, New York 10001 Telephone: (212) 228-6320 Email: generalcounsel@acornmail.net For Plaintiffs 10

NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFICE /s/ Scott Fuqua Assistant Attorney General PO Drawer 1508 Santa Fe, NM 87504 (505) 827-6000 Email: sfuqua@nmag.gov For Defendant Secretary of State /s/ Adrian Terry Elaine Luján Assistant Attorneys General PO Drawer 1508 Santa Fe, NM 87504-1508 (505) 827-6040 Email: aterry@nmag.gov Email: elujan@nmag.gov For Defendants HSD and TRD 11