Hispanics and the Changing Racial Demographics of the Intermountain West

Similar documents
Race, Immigration and America s s Changing Electorate. William H. Frey The Brookings Institution

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN ARIZONA. March 4, 2014

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN COLORADO. June 25, 2014

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by

Immigration Goes Nationwide Recent dispersal has made immigrants and new minorities more visible

America s s Emerging Demography The role of minorities, college grads & the aging and younging of the population

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

American Dental Association

How The Mountain West States Voted In 2016: A Post-Election Analysis of Trends, Demographics, and Politics in America s New Swing Region

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Latinos and the Mid- term Election

Demographic Change How the US is Coping with Aging, Immigration, and Other Challenges William H. Frey

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

America s Electoral Future

A Glance at THE LATINO VOTE IN Clarissa Martinez De Castro

Battleground Districts July 2018 Midterm Survey Immigration Policy Attitudes

The Rising American Electorate

NABPAC 2016 Biennial Post Election Conference

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

ELECTION OVERVIEW. + Context: Mood of the Electorate. + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward?

How the Rising Share of Latino Voters Will Impact the 2016 Elections. By Anna Chu and Charles Posner December

Trump, Populism and the Economy

Mindy Romero, Ph.D. Director

The US Electoral College: the antiquated key to presidential success

Mindy Romero, Ph.D. Director

United States: Implications of the Midterm Elections for Economic Policy

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

THE 2012 ELECTIONS A LOOK AHEAD DOUG SOSNIK MAY 31, 2012

Democracy Corps - Mountain West Frequency Questionnaire

Please note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data.

TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2016 ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES: 11

America s Electoral Future

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Elections: a Visual Data Base

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

Most Have Heard Little or Nothing about Redistricting Debate LACK OF COMPETITION IN ELECTIONS FAILS TO STIR PUBLIC

America s Voice/Latino Decisions. Colorado Latino Voter Survey. Sept./Oct. 2012

Growth Leads to Transformation

The Rising American Electorate

1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (main) (fax)

2018 MIDTERMS PRE- ELECTION OVER VIEW OCTOBER 2018

The Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West

Note: The sum of percentages for each question may not add up to 100% as each response is rounded to the nearest percent.

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Election: A Visual Database

POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE LATINO VOTE By NALEO Educational Fund

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 29, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Race, Immigration, and America s Changing Electorate 1

William C. Velásquez Institute

Endnotes on Campaign 2000 SOME FINAL OBSERVATIONS ON VOTER OPINIONS

Decisión Latino voters, immigration policy and the 2012 election

Red Shift. The Domestic Policy Program. October 2010

How Utah Ranks. Utah Education Association Research Bulletin

2016 us election results

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

Trump, Clinton and the Future of the United States of America

Obama vs. Romney: Is It the Economy, Stupid?

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Findings from Wave 1 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey. May 2018

Swing Voters in Swing States Troubled By Iraq, Economy; Unimpressed With Bush and Kerry, Annenberg Data Show

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

National Latino Leader? The Job is Open

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

The Electoral College And

Yes, Registered 100% No, Not Registered -- Male 64 Female Older than 65 25

The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America 9/17/2014

The Social Policy & Politics Program. August 13, 2012

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE Friday, Nov. 7, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Latino Voter Growth by State. UnidosUS Page 1. California Civic Engagement Project

Latino Decisions / America's Voice June State Latino Battleground Survey

Decisión Latino voters, immigration policy and the 2012 election

A New Conventional Wisdom for the Latino Vote: Trends in and Predictions for

The Electoral Consequences of Granting Citizenship to Undocumented Immigrants

Regional Variations in Public Opinion on the Affordable Care Act

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

What Happened on Election Day

Comprehensive Immigration Reform and Winning the Latino Vote

President Donald Trump: how and what next?

Arizona Gains Rhode Island s Seat With New 2018 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Newsweek Poll Princeton Survey Research Associates International. Final Topline Results (6/28/10)

I. The relationship between states ratio of Democratic/Republican votes and measures of personal responsibility

Changes in Party Identification among U.S. Adult Catholics in CARA Polls, % 48% 39% 41% 38% 30% 37% 31%

Background Information on Redistricting

Rising American Electorate & Working Class Women Strike Back. November 9, 2018

AP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ. Voter Trends in A Final Examination. By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017

introduction America s New Swing Region

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth

Pew Research Center. December 10,

THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE: MIDSUMMER July 7-14, 2008

An Election Year Like No Other:

Latinos in the 2016 Election:

Rock the Vote September Democratic Strategic Analysis by Celinda Lake, Joshua E. Ulibarri, and Karen M. Emmerson

THE TARRANCE GROUP. Interested Parties. Brian Nienaber. Key findings from the Battleground Week 6 Survey

Transcription:

Hispanics and the Changing Racial Demographics of the Intermountain West William H. Frey The Brookings Institution www.frey-demographer.org

2008: Greater Minority Turnout and Share of the Voter Population Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Purple States Where did Minorities Win the Election for Obama? Current Demographics and Polling in the Mountain West

Democratic Margins by Race 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10-10 0-20 -30-40 91 77 36 27 20 12-17 -12 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of National Election Poll and VNS

Number of Voters: 2004, 2008 millions 20 14.0 16.1 10 7.6 9.7 2.8 3.6 0 Blacks Hispanics Asians 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November 2004, 2008 supplements

Eligible Voters as Share of Total Population: Whites* Blacks* Hispanics Asians* 77% 21% 2% 30% 66% 4% 42% 13% 45% 53% 22% 25% Under Age 18 Age 18+, Non Citizen Eligible Voters * Non Hispanics Source: William H. Frey analysis CPS November 2008 Supplement

Turnout Rates, 2004 and 2008 70 60 50 67 66 60 65 47 50 48 45 40 30 20 10 0 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November 2004, 2008 supplements

Turnout Rates, 18-29 Year Olds 60 50 40 30 52 52 50 58 36 41 32 43 20 10 0 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians 2004 2008 Source: Lopez and Taylor, Pew Hispanic Center, 2009

2004-8 Growth: Eligible Voters and Voters 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 30.3 28.4 21.4 20.4 15.1 6.8 2.1 0.5 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians Eligible Voters Voters Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November 2004, 2008 supplements

2004 vs 2008 Comparisons 100% Population Eligible Voters Voters 80% 60% 40% 68 65 76 73 79 76 20% 0% 2004 2008 2004 2008 2004 2008 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians Others Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November supplements

Hispanic Shares 2008 Populations, Voters States With Largest Hispanic Share Populations New Mexico Texas California Arizona Nevada Florida Colorado New Jersey New York Illinois 6 20 21 12 24 12 21 15 18 9 17 9 16 10 14 32 34 37 40 47 0 10 20 30 40 50 Voters Population Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November 2008 supplement

Blue Red and Purple States, 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis Solid Blue Solid Red Purple-Dem Purple-Rep

Fast-Growing Purple States, 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis Purple-Dem Purple-Rep All Other

Slow-Growing Purple States, 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis Purple-Dem Purple-Rep All Other

2008 Voter Profiles of State Groupings Fast Growing Purple Slow Growing Purple 0.8 Solid Blue Solid Red 0.8 16.1 1.6 8.3 7.8 1.7 5.1 9.8 10.7 7.5 14.5 72.5 88.5 72.9 75.2 Whites* Blacks* Hispanics Asians* Others* * Non Hispanics Source: William H. Frey analysis CPS November 2008 supplement

Fast-Growing vs Slow-Growing Purple State Growth, 2004-8 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 7.8-1.7 36.8 28.0 8.3 8.3 41.8 12.6 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians, Other Fast Growing Slow Growing Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November 2004, 2008 supplements

Nevada, New Mexico Voters: 2004, 2008 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nevada New Mexico 80 73 56 55 2004 2008 2004 2008 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians Others Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November Supplements

Nevada Democratic Margins 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10-10 0-20 -30-40 89 73 54 12 21-3 -12-8 Total Whites Blacks Hispanics 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of National Election Poll and VNS

New Mexico Democratic Margins 50 40 39 30 20 10 15 12 0-10 -20-1 -13-14 Total Whites Hispanics 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of National Election Poll and VNS

Florida, Virginia Voters: 2004, 2008 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Florida Virginia 76 71 81 74 2004 2008 2004 2008 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians Others Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November Supplements

Florida Democratic Margins 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10-10 0-20 -30-40 92 73 15 3-5 -15-14 -12 Total Whites Blacks Hispanics 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of National Election Poll and VNS

Virginia Democratic Margins 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10-10 0-20 -30-40 -50 84 75 31 6-8 -21-36 Total Whites Blacks Hispanics 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of National Election Poll and VNS

Ohio, Pennsylvania Voters: 2004, 2008 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Ohio Pennsylvania 86 85 89 87 2004 2008 2004 2008 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians Others Source: William H. Frey analysis of CPS November Supplements

Ohio Democratic Margins 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 -20 95 68 5-2 -6-12 Total Whites Blacks 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of National Election Poll and VNS

Pennsylvania Democratic Margins 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10-10 0-20 -30-40 90 68 44 44 10 2-3 -9 Total Whites Blacks Hispanics 2004 2008 Source: William H. Frey analysis of National Election Poll and VNS

Where Minorities Won for Democrats 2004 - Kerry Took 20 States 10 states-whites went Democratic (62 electoral college) 10 states-minorities won for Dems (190 electoral college) Source: William H. Frey 2008 - Obama Took 29 States 19 states-whites went Democratic (223 electoral college) 10 states-minorities won for Dems (142 electoral college)

2004 Blue States: Won by Whites and Minorities Source: William H. Frey analysis

2008 Blue States: Won by Whites and Minorities Source: William H. Frey analysis

2010 Population and Eligible Voters by Race-Ethnicity: US and Mountain West 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 16 10 24 16 65 73 65 74 Total Pop Eligible Voters Total Pop Eligible Voters USA Mountain West Whites Blacks Asians Others Hispanics

Total Population by Race-Ethnicity, 2010: Six Mountain West States 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 41 44 New Mexico 10 10 24 19 32 84 87 73 55 57 Arizona Nevada Colorado Utah Idaho Whites Blacks Asians Others Hispanics

Eligible Voters by Race-Ethnicity, 2010: Six Mountain West States 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 33 53 New Mexico 21 14 12 5 5 90 92 81 67 69 Arizona Nevada Colorado Utah Idaho Whites Blacks Asians Others Hispanics

Party Affiliation: US Registered Latino Voters 70 (Registered Latinos) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 y2002 y2004 y2006 y2008 y2010 Democrat Republican Source: Pew Hispanic Center, "Latinos and the 2010 Elections" October 5, 2010

Party with More Concern for Hispanics 60 (Registered Latinos) 50 40 30 20 10 0 y2002 y2004 y2006 y2008 y2010 Democrat Republican Source: Pew Hispanic Center, "Latinos and the 2010 Elections" October 5, 2010

Right Direction/Wrong Track? 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Whites Hispanics Whites Hispanics Country (Adults.6 MT West States) Right Wrong Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey State

Country: Right Direction Minus Wrong Track Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

State: Right Direction Minus Wrong Track Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 10 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

Obama Favorability 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (Adults: 6 MT West States) 26 44 8 11 9 12 55 35 Whites Hispanics Unfavorable Neutral/NA Favorable Very Favorable Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Obama: Favorable Minus Unfavorable Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 30 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

Bush Favorability 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (Adults: 6 MT West States) 17 25 15 16 17 15 44 51 Whites Hispanics Unfavorable Neutral/NA Favorable Very Favorable Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Palin Favorability 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (Adsult: 6 MT West States) 14 24 10 11 24 18 47 52 Whites Hispanics Unfavorable Neutral/NA Favorable Very Favorable Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Congressional Democrat Favorability 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (Adults: 6 MT West States) 12 23 13 18 17 23 57 37 Whites Hispanics Unfavorable Neutral/NA Favorable Very Favorable Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Congressional Democrats: Favorable Minus Unfavorable Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

Congressional Republican Favorability 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (Adults: 6 MT West States) 15 14 17 16 26 23 42 47 Whites Hispanics Unfavorable Neutral/NA Favorable Very Favorable Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Congressional Republicans: Favorable Minus Unfavorable Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 0-5 -10-15 -20-25 -30 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

State Democrat Favorability 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (Adults 6 MT West States) 15 23 13 19 24 22 48 36 Whites Hispanics Unfavorable Neutral/NA Favorable Very Favorable Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

State Democrats: Favorable Minus Unfavorable Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 30 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

State Republican Favorability 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (Adults: 6 MT West States) 24 18 16 17 24 25 42 34 Whites Hispanics Unfavorable Neutral/NA Favorable Very Favorable Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

State Republicans: Favorable Minus Unfavorable Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 20 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 -20-25 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

Priority Issues for Whites (percent ranking issue as extremely important) 1 57% Jobs/Econ Growth 2 50% Schools 3 49% Federal Govt Spending 4 49% Illegal Immigrants 5 43% Crime and Drugs Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Priority Issues for Hispanics (percent ranking issue as extremely important) 1 63% Jobs/Econ Growth 2 63% Schools 3 59% Crime and Drugs 4 48% Environment 5 47% Health Care Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Obama Health Care Plan 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 17 15 7 11 50 Whites 25 25 7 12 31 Hispanics Strong Oppose Oppose DK/Ref Support Strong Support Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Financial Reform 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 29 31 19 29 10 16 12 11 26 17 Whites Hispanics Strong Oppose Oppose DK/Ref Support Strong Support Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Income Taxes 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 4 4 3 54 51 41 42 Whites Hispanics Too High About Right Don't Pay/DK Too Low Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Arizona Immigration Law 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 29 50 18 Whites 57 28 12 Hispanics Not Far Enough About Right Goes Too Far Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

AZ Immigration Law: Goes Too Far Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

Stop Illegal Immigration Flows Federal Involvement Level? 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 6 17 77 Whites 13 19 68 Hispanics More Same/DK Less Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Illegal Flows: Need More Federal Involvement Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

Deal with Illegals Here: 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Federal Involvement Level? 9 20 19 22 72 58 Whites Hispanics More Same/DK Less Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Deal with Illegals Here: State Involvement Level? 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 12 22 66 Whites 22 26 52 Hispanics More Same/DK Less Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Illegals Here : Need More State Involvement Whites and Hispanics - MT West States 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Whites Hispanics

Immigrants: Strength vs Burden 45 42 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 30 Whites 28 Strength 23 Hispanics Burden Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey

Illegals: Pathway vs No Amnesty 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 35 31 Whites Pathway No Amnesty 46 23 Hispanics Source: UNLV/BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST Survey