IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/19/2017 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Case 1:17-cv RDM Document 16 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv JDB Document 69 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

EPA Final Brief in West Virginia v. EPA, D.C. Cir. No , Doc. # (filed April 22, 2016), at 61.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

[ARGUED APRIL 12, 2016; DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 2016] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case No , consolidated with No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD EN BANC ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN CASE NO ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN CASE NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Attorney General Doug Peterson News Release

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VOTER WHERE TO MAIL VOTER REGISTRATION FORM. Office of the Secretary of State P.O. Box 5616 Montgomery, AL

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SET IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Petitioners, Respondent.

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 10 Filed 07/27/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND. January 23, 2008

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

Case: , 11/17/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 36, Page 1 of 12 No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 8-1 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. MEXICHEM FLUOR, INC., ET AL.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Control Number : Item Number : 1. Addendum StartPage : 0

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED. No and Consolidated Cases

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

If you have questions, please or call

A. ALLEGATIONS. WHEREAS, Glazer has cooperated and has agreed to continue to cooperate fully with the ongoing Attorneys General s Investigation;

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Case 1:05-cv CKK-AK Document 156 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

Case 2:18-cv JAM-DB Document 15 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:18-cv JAM-DB Document 34 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 8

Dear Majority Leader McConnell and Minority Leader Schumer; Speaker Ryan and Minority Leader Pelosi:

Limited Liability Corporations List of State Offices Contact Information

No ERICK DANIEL DAvus, LORRIES PAWS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

In the Supreme Court of the United States

[PROPOSED] ORDER. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners, COMMONWEALTH OF

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

2016 us election results

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

CITYOFELPASO, TEXAS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:14-cv Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/14 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 181 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

Majority of State Minimum Wages Higher Than Federal Rate for 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Supreme Court of the United States

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Petitioners, Respondent.

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Roster. Health Committee OFFICERS MEMBERS CONNECTICUT

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

CLERK RECEIVED. JTW OR UiSThICT ØF OL tikbta. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC1 lit ETSY, INC., Petitioner

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

Transcription:

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION S OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, et al. v. Petitioners, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 18-1011 (Lead) Consolidated with Nos. 18-1012, 18-1013, 18-1014 Respondents. JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. APP. P. 42(b) Pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioners Mozilla Corporation, Open Technology Institute New America Foundation, Public Knowledge and the Attorneys General of twenty-two states ( Petitioners ) and Respondents Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) and United States of America hereby jointly stipulate to the dismissal of the petitions for review without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs. Petitioners take no position on the rationale of the FCC s motion to dismiss. As Petitioners have explained to the Court, Petitioners filed their petitions for review early (ten days after the Order was released but prior to Federal Register publication) only out of an abundance of caution: the filings were intended to ensure that Petitioners could participate in a judicial lottery if the FCC chose to

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 2 of 9 forward any petition to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, as the FCC had done with petitions for review of the 2015 Open Internet Order. See, e.g., Mozilla Pet. 2-3. The goal of the protective petitions is no longer relevant as the agency did not forward the petitions, Mot. 9-10, and the agency has represented that these premature petitions will not deprive Petitioners of their opportunity to seek judicial review of the Order or to participate in any judicial lottery because petitioners will remain free to file new petitions for review after the summary of the Order is published in the Federal Register, id. 12. Respectfully submitted, Kevin Kendrick Russell GOLDSTEIN & RUSSELL, PC 7475 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 850 Bethesda, MD 20814 krussell@goldsteinrussell.com s New America Foundation s Open Technology Institute and Public Knowledge /s/ Markham C. Erickson Markham C. Erickson *Georgios Leris Steptoe & Johnson LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 429-3000 Mozilla Corporation [Petitioners list continued on next page] 2

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 3 of 9 Xavier Becerra Sarah E. Kurtz DEPUTY Nicklas A. Akers SENIOR ASSISTANT Michael E. Elisofon Stacey D. Schesser SUPERVISING DEPUTY ATTORNEYS GENERAL Daniel Osborn DEPUTY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE DIVISION OF PUBLIC RIGHTS CONSUMER LAW SECTION 455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 (415) 703-5562 State of California *Karl A. Racine Loren L. Alikhan ACTING SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Solicitor General 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 600 South Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 727-6287 District of Columbia Eric T. Schneiderman Steven C. Wu DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL Ester Murdukhayeva ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL Kathleen McGee CHIEF, BUREAU OF INTERNET & TECHNOLOGY Noah Stein Jordan Adler ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS GENERAL BUREAU OF INTERNET & TECHNOLOGY 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 (212) 416-6312 State of New York Thomas J. Donovan, Jr. *Christopher J. Curtis CHIEF, PUBLIC PROTECTION DIVISION ASSISTANT 109 State Street Montpelier, VT 05609 (802) 828-5586 State of Vermont 3

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 4 of 9 Matthew P. Denn Christian Douglas Wright DIRECTOR OF CONSUMER PROTECTION Jillian A. Lazar DEPUTY 820 N. French Street, 5th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8600 State of Delaware Thomas J. Miller *Benjamin E. Bellus ASSISTANT Nathan Blake DEPUTY CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION 1305 East Walnut Street, Second Floor Des Moines, IA 50319 (515) 281-5926 State of Iowa Brian E. Frosh Richard L. Trumka, Jr. Steven M. Sakamoto-Wengel Leah Tulin ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS GENERAL 200 St. Paul Place, 16th floor Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 576-6957 State of Maryland George Jepsen Jonathan J. Blake John S. Wright Michael C. Wertheimer ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS GENERAL Attorney General's Office 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 (860) 808-5400 State of Connecticut Douglas S. Chin Clyde J. Wadsworth SOLICITOR GENERAL Bryan C. Yee Mana Moriarty DEPUTY ATTORNEYS GENERAL 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 (808) 586-1180 State of Hawaii Janet T. Mills Brendan O Neil ASSISTANT of Maine 6 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333 (207) 626-8842 State of Maine 4

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 5 of 9 Andy Beshear J. Michael Brown DEPUTY La Tasha Buckner ASSISTANT DEPUTY S. Travis Mayo EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Matt James ASSISTANT 700 Capitol Avenue Capitol Building, Suite 118 Frankfort, Kentucky 40601-3449 (502) 696-5300 State of Kentucky Lori Swanson Katherine T. Kelly ASSISTANT James W. Canaday DEPUTY Jason Pleggenkuhle MANAGER, CIVIL DIVISION Joseph C. Meyer ASSISTANT 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1200 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2130 (651) 757-1308 State of Minnesota Lisa Madigan David Franklin SOLICITOR GENERAL Brett E. Legner Deputy Solicitor General Susan L. Satter PUBLIC UTILITIES POLICY COUNSEL Anna P. Crane PUBLIC INTEREST COUNSEL Christopher Kim ASSISTANT 100 West Randolph Street, 12th Floor Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 814-5028 State of Illinois Maura Healey Jared Rinehimer ASSISTANT CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION Timothy Reppucci ASSISTANT Energy and Telecommunications Division One Ashburton Place, 18th Floor Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2200 Commonwealth of Massachusetts 5

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 6 of 9 Hector Balderas *Tania Maestas DEPUTY 408 Galiseto Santa Fe, NM 87501 (505) 490-4060 State of New Mexico Ellen F. Rosenblum *Keith L. Kutler SENIOR ASSISTANT Benjamin Gutman SOLICITOR GENERAL Andrew Shull SENIOR ASSISTANT Oregon Department of Justice 1162 Court Street, NE Salem, OR 97301 (503) 378-4402 State of Oregon Peter F. Kilmartin Michael W. Field ASSISTANT 150 South Main Street Providence, Rhode Island 02903 (401) 274-4400 State of Rhode Island Jim Hood *Crystal Utley Secoy CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION Mississippi Attorney General s Office Post Office Box 22947 Jackson, Mississippi 39225 (601) 359-4213 State of Mississippi Joshua H. Stein *Kevin Anderson SENIOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION Sripriya Narasimhan DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL 114 West Edenton Street Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 716-6000 State of North Carolina Robert W. Ferguson Tiffany Lee ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS GENERAL 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 464-6098 State of Washington 6

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 7 of 9 Mark R. Herring *Samuel T. Towell DEPUTY, CIVIL LITIGATION Mark S. Kubiak ASSISTANT, UNIT MANAGER Barbara Johns Building 202 N. Ninth Street Richmond, VA 23219 (804) 786-6731 Commonwealth of Virginia Josh Shapiro Michael J. Fischer CHIEF DEPUTY John M. Abel SENIOR DEPUTY Brandon J. Bingle DEPUTY Office of Attorney General Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 (215) 560-2171 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dated: February 16, 2018 /s/ Nickolai Gilford Levin Kristen Ceara Limarzi Robert J. Wiggers Nickolai Gilford Levin U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION, APPELLATE SECTION 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 kristen.limarzi@usdoj.gov robert.wiggers@usdoj.gov Nickolai.Levin@usdoj.gov Counsel for Respondent United States of America /s/ David M. Gossett Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. David M. Gossett Jacob M. Lewis James M. Carr Scott M. Noveck FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 (202) 418-1740 fcclitigation@fcc.gov Counsel for Respondent Federal Communications Commission Dated: February 16, 2018 7

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 8 of 9 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH TYPE-VOLUME LIMIT Certificate of Compliance with Type-Volume Limitation, Typeface Requirements and Type-Style Requirements 1. This document complies with the word limit of Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2) because, excluding the parts of the document exempted by Fed. R. App. P. 32(f) and D.C. Circuit Rule 32(e)(1): this document contains 234 words, or this brief uses a monospaced typeface and contains lines of text. 2. This document complies with the typeface requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(5) and the type-style requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(6) because: this document has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft Word 2010 in 14-point Times New Roman, or this document has been prepared in a monospaced typeface using with. /s/ Georgios Leris Georgios Leris

USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 9 of 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Georgios Leris, hereby certify that on February 16, 2018, I caused the foregoing to be filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit using the appellate CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the appellate CM/ECF system. Some participants, marked with an asterisk, are not CM/ECF users; I certify that I have caused paper copies of the foregoing document to be served on those participants by first-class mail, unless another attorney for the same party is receiving electronic service. /s/ Georgios Leris Georgios Leris