BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING. Comes now Yates Petroleum Corporation (Yates), by and through its undersigned

Similar documents
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Herschler Bldg., Hearing Rm W. 25thStreet CHEYENNE, WYOMING

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNClt:c x,:en ) ) ) ) PETITIONER'S PRE-HEARING MEMORANDUM

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING

BEFORE THE M,." ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL AR FINDINGS OF FACT. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

BEFORE THE 1::}) ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL DEe 17 2a. STATE OF WYOMING i,lrn.rljby, c. '09

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALrrJ LAND QUALITY DIVISION OCT STATE OF WYOMING MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 39 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5. Paul M. Seby (admitted pro hac vice) Robert J. Walker (Wyo. Bar No.

This matter came on for hearing before the Environmental Quality Council on April 30th,

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING ) ) ) SIERRA CLUB S RESPONSE TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE

. FEB JImRUb EnViron:;~~X~CUtive Secreta a QUalityCOuner Office of the Attorney General

PETITION FOR CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON [Pursuant to Penal Code and ]

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL. OF THE STATE OF WYOMING

STATEOFWYOMING.Ii", 24 20

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING

ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

Wyoming State Emergency Response Commission (SERC)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

APPENDIX F. NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY APPELLATE PRACTICE FORMS 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL ) ) ) NOTICE OF HEARING AND ORDER

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE OIL CONSERVATION COMMISSION. Petitioners Earthworks Oil and Gas Accountability Project ( OGAP ) and New Mexico

RECEIVED ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

r!lep COURT Respondents. Petitioners, THE INTERIOR; SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;

A GUIDE TO PRACTICE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING FOR AN CHILD NAME CHANGE IN NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 08/04/14 1 of 9. PageID #: 3

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE. vs. Case No.: License No.: PTA FINAL ORDER

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 08/28/2018 Page 1 of 15 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF NEWTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS CIVIL DIVISION THE ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF APPEAL

PLATTE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING FEBRUARY 15, 2012

Case 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Document 9-1 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 195 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10. James Kaste, Wyo. Bar No Timothy C. Fox, Montana Attorney General

V. CASE NO CA-00669

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE 37th HELICOPTER SQUADRON AND CITY OF CHEYENNE

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR MARION COUNTY. Defendant/Petitioner ( Defendant ), Jason Carter, by and through his undersigned

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

CAUSE NO PC IN PROBATE COURT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Plaintiff,

Termination of Guardianship Minor. Forms and Procedures. For Wyoming MOVANT

Case KRH Doc 1952 Filed 04/05/16 Entered 04/05/16 22:00:50 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CLEARFIELD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION INSTRUCTIONS: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF A CUSTODY ORDER

CHAPTER 7 ANNEXATION Chapter Outline

Petition for Ex-Parte Order

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PO Box 1911 AFIN Deer Park, TX CONSENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

ENFORCEMENT STAFF REPORT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

Petition for Order of Nondisclosure

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY'S MEMORANDUM ON PUBLIC NUISANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 12

Case Document 735 Filed in TXSB on 05/28/18 Page 1 of 8

Notice of Intent to Adopt Rules

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

ORIGINAL PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME OF ADULT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION LAW ORDER. AND NOW, this day of 20, a hearing on the Petition for

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

April 20, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

[Docket No. ONRR ; DS DR2PS0000.CH D0102R2] Notice of Proposed Audit Delegation Renewal for the States of Alaska, California,

June 2, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal, and all attachments thereto.

RECEIVED. JlN 2 9 2U03 REGULATION. Petitioner: ATTORNEY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondent: JAMES JOHN JORISSEN, U alicia JAY J.

Form DC-625 MOTION AND NOTICE AND JUDGMENT Page: 1 FOR ARREARAGES

November 29, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

Rule Change #1998(14)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD/MCALILEY (and consolidated cases)

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SUBCHAPTER B PROCEDURAL RULES

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Denver, Colorado 80202

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R186-18

Case: 3:16-cv wmc Document #: 3 Filed: 07/06/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Revenue Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Case 3:15-cv RRE-ARS Document 91 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Enclosed, for electric filing, is Application of Midwest Energy Cooperative in the abovereferenced

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

PETITION FOR CITATION FOR CONTEMPT AND MODIFICATION OF CHILD SUPPORT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION LAW IN RE: CHANGE OF NAME OF : NO. : ORDER

IN THE COURT OF THE QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA (THE O-GAH-PAH) ) In re Petition for Change of Name of: ) ) ) Petitioner. ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MILWAUKEE COUNTY. CLEAN WATER ACTION COUNCIL OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN P.O. Box 9144 Green Bay, WI 54308;

STAFF ACTIVITY REPORT

MINUTES THE STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS December 8, 2011

Transcription:

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF CLABAUGH RANCH, INC. FROM OF WYOMING POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (WYPDES PERMIT WY0050989 Docket No. 08-3811 YATES PETROLEUM CORPORATION'S RESPONSE TO CLABAUGH RANCH, INC.'S PETITION Comes now Yates Petroleum Corporation (Yates, by and through its undersigned counsel, and responds to Clabaugh Ranch, Inc.'s (Clabaugh's appeal of Yates' WYPDES permit number WY0050989 (as set forth in Clabaugh's Petition [the Petition], dated December 22, 2008. Yates responds as follows. Yates' Responses to Allegations Set Forth in Clabaugh's Petition 1. Yates admits, based on information and belief, the allegations set forth in Paragraph 1 ofthe Petition. 2. Yates admits, based on information and belief, the allegations set forth in Paragraph 2 of the Petition. 3(a. Upon information and belief, Yates admits the allegation set forth in Paragraph 3a. of the Petition. 3(b. Yates admits the allegation set forth in Paragraph 3b. ofthe Petition. 3( c. Yates admits the allegation set forth in Paragraph 3c. ofthe Petition. 3( d. Yates admits that the outfalls are located up drainage from the Clabaugh Ranch. Yates denies all other allegations set forth in Paragraph 3d. ofthe Petition.

Page 2 of6 3(e. Yates cannot admit or deny the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3e. ofthe Petition as it is without sufficient knowledge of the allegations regarding the "Lance permit." Yates denies any other allegations set forth in or implied by paragraph 3e. of the Petition. 3(t. 3(g. Yates denies all allegations set forth in Paragraph 3f. of the Petition. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3g. of the Petition is vague, ambiguous and conclusory and fails to specify any facts regarding how the permit fails to maintain and protect water uses in violation of Chapter 1, Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations (WWQRR, Section 8 or any other provision of the Environmental Quality Act. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3g. 3 (h. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3h. of the Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 1, Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations (WWQRR, Section 15 or any other provision of the Environmental Quality Act. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3h. 3(i.. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3i. ofthe Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 1, Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations (WWQRR, Section 16 or any other provision of the Environmental Quality Act. Yates cannot frame

Page 3 of6 a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3i. 30. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3j. of the Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 1, Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations (WWQRR, Section 17 or any other provision of the Environmental Quality Act. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3j. 3(k. The allegations set forth in Paragraph 3k. ofthe Petition are vague, violation of Chapter 1, Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations (WWQRR, Section 20. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3k. 3(1. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 31. of the Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 1, Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations (WWQRR, Section 23. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 31. 3(m. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3m. of the Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 2, WWQRR, Section 5(c(ii. Yates cannot frame a responsive

Page 4 of6 Paragraph 3m. 3(n. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3n. of the Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 2, WWQRR, Section 9(a(v. Yates cannot frame a responsive Paragraph 3 n. 3(0. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 30. ofthe Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 2, WWQRR, Section 9(a(vi. Yates cannot frame a responsive Paragraph 30. 3(p. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3p. ofthe Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 2, WWQRR, Appendix H paragraphs (b(i, (b(ii, (b(v, (b(vii and (b(ix. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3p. 3(q. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3q. of the Petition is vague, violation of Chapter 2, WWQRR, Appendix H paragraph (d(iv. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3q.

Page 5 of6 3 (r. The allegations set forth in Paragraph 3r. of the Petition are vague, ambiguous and conc1usory and fails to specify any facts regarding how the permit is in violation of 40 C.F.R. 435, Subpart E and/or Chapter 2, WWQRR, Appendix H paragraph (d(iv. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3r. 3(s. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3s. of the Petition is vague, ambiguous and conc1usory and fail to specify any facts regarding how the permit will not protect plant life from adverse effects of the discharge or how the permit will cause a measurable decrease in crop and livestock production. Yates cannot frame a responsive Paragraph 3s. 3(t. The allegation set forth in Paragraph 3t. of the Petition is vague, ambiguous and conc1usory and fails to specify any facts regarding how the permit is in violation ofthe anti-backsliding provisions of the Clean Water Act. Yates cannot frame a responsive pleading to this allegation. Accordingly, Yates denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3t. 4. Petitioner's request for relief is not an allegation of fact to which an answer is required. Yates' General Denial To the extent the Petition raises any allegations beyond those specifically denied above, Yates denies all such allegations and reserves the right to fully address all allegations during these proceedings, as appropriate.

Page 6 of6 Yates' Affirmative Defenses 1. The EQC lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Clabaugh's appeal. 2. Clabaugh lacks standing to bring this appeal. 3. Clabaugh did not properly exhaust its administrative remedies before the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. To the extent Clabaugh's Petition raises any allegations beyond those specifically denied above, Yates denies any and all such allegations and reserves the right to fully address all allegations at appropriate stages of these proceedings. WHEREFORE, Yates respectfully requests that the Environmental Quality Council enter an order affirming the issuance ofwypdes permit number WY0050989. Respectfully submitted this ~(:day of January, 2009. Matthew Joy Eric L. Hiser (Wyo. Bar No. 6-4003 Jorden Bischoff & Hiser 7272 E, Indian School Road, Suite 360 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Phone: (480 505-3900 Fax: (480 505-3901 Attorneys for Yates Petroleum Corporation

Certificate of Service I certify that on this;l 0 day of January, 2009, service of a true and complete copy of Yates Petroleum Corporation's Response to Clabaugh Ranch Inc.'s Petition was made upon each party or attorney of record herein as indicated below. The ORIGINAL and eleven (11 copies were filed by Federal Express of the same on January 2.0, 2009 with: Jim Ruby, Executive Secretary Wyoming Environmental Quality Council 122 W. 25 th Street Herschler Bldg., R. 1714 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 COPIES were served by Federal Express ofthe same on January.2.0,2009 with: Tom C. Toner Attorney for Clabaugh Ranch, Inc. 319 W. Dow St. P.O. Box 6288 Sheridan, WY 82801-1688 John Burbridge Office of the Attorney General 123 Capitol 200 W. 24th Street Cheyenne, WY 82002 John Corra, Director Department of Environmental Quality 122 W. 25 th Street Herschler Building, 4th Floor West Cheyenne, WY 82002 (2 COPIES John Wagner Wyoming DEQ, Water Quality Division 122 W. 25 th Street Herschler Building, 4th Floor Cheyenne, WY 82002