Case 2:15-cv DDP-JC Document 246 Filed 08/11/17 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:4165

Similar documents
Case 2:15-cv DDP-JC Document 25 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:211

HLED M'I Plaintiff, VERDICT FORM # 1

Case 5:17-cv CBM-RAO Document 446 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:17580

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

Case 5:19-cv HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20

E D AUG 1 G 2 0 « CLERK OF THE COURT CSeriT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Case No.

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:11-cv JHM Document 7 Filed 06/06/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 64

HYDERALLY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 3:01-cv PCD Document 57 Filed 03/23/2004 Page 1 of 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:12-cv MAS-LHG Document 29 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 227 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (Central Courthouse)

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Invasion of Privacy CONFLICT

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

1. Under what theory, or theories, if any, might Patty bring an action against Darby? Discuss.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Town of Topsham 100 Main Street Topsham, Maine Phone: Fax:

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE. COMES NOW, JANE DOE, Plaintiff, complaining of SEA WORLD PARKS &

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 11 UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 5:02-cv WTH Document 12 Filed 10/23/2002 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : O R D E R

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and

Robert I, Duke of Normandy. 22 June July 1035

College/University Attended Degree Awarded (if any) Years Grade Pt. Average

Case 1:17-cv WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 JURY INSTRUCTIONS

COPY 1AR ) Dept.: P52 ) 2. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 17 ) 4. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 19 )

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

-rvw... cum- ~/ll'fm'3

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:13-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION JUDGE:

CO:MMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY 28th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT DMSION.1 CML ACTION NO. 17-CI INSTRUCTIONS OF THE COURT

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California. Law & Order Code TITLE 3 TORTS. [Last Amended 10/1/04. Current Through 2/3/09.]

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

8.50 INVASION OF PRIVACY DAMAGES (01/2016) NOTE TO JUDGE

3. Defendant JOHN DOES 1-3 ( Defendants Doe ) are fictitious names for presently

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

Case 1:14-cv SOM-BMK Document 1 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL I. INTRODUCTION

)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

EFiled: Jan :11AM EST Transaction ID Case No. S19C ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Indiana Association of Professional Investigators November 16, 2017 Stephanie C. Courter

PATRICIA SNYDER, an individual, Plaintiff/Appellant, BANNER HEALTH, an Arizona corporation; RAMIL GOEL, M.D., an individual, Defendants/Appellees.

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13

I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.

LAUREL COUNTY, KENTUCKY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND COMPLAINT. Preliminary Statement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/16 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.

STATE OF OHIO IN THE MENTOR MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. Hon. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HERON)

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WESTERN VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : PARTIES

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv ECF No. 1 filed 11/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 17

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

case 2:14-cv PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-ddp-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 '~` ~, FLED CLE~sK. ~~. C!~TFiICT COURT ~IJG I i ~~i CENTRAL D~SrTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION HALEY VIDECKIS and LAYANA WHITE, individuals, v. Plaintiffs, PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY, a corporation doing business in Car fornia, Defendant. CASE NO. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx) VERDICT FORM FOR PLAINTIFF HALEY VIDECKS [Assigned to Hon. Dean D. Pregerson, Courtroom C] VIOLATION OF RIGHT OF PRIVACY. Did Plaintiff Haley Videckis have a reasonable expectation of privacy? If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question 0.. Did Defendant Pepperdine University intentionally intrude into Plaintiff Videckis' privacy?. 0- iooz i - Case. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx) '

Case :-cv-00-ddp-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question 0.. Did Plaintiff Videckis consent to Defendant Pepperdine's intrusion into her privacy? If your answer to question is no, answer question. If your answer to question is yes, go to and answer question 0.. Was Defendant Pepperdine's intrusion into Plaintiff Videckis' privacy justified? If your answer to question is yes, answer question S. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question.. If you found Defendant Pepperdine's intrusion into Plaintiff Videckis' privacy was justified, did Plaintiff Videckis prove there was a practical, effective, and less invasive method of achieving Defendant Pepperdine's purpose? If your answer to question S is yes, answer question. If your answer to question S is no, go to and answer question D. /// /// ///. 0- iooz i ' Case. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx) VERDICT FORM HALEY VIDECKIS

Case :-cv-00-ddp-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:. Would Defendant Pepperdine's intrusion into Plaintiff Videckis' privacy be highly offensive to a reasonable person? If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question 0.. Was Plaintiff Videckis harmed by Defendant Pepperdine intruding into ' 0 her privacy? If your answer to question is yes, answey question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question 0.. Was Defendant Pepperdine's conduct intruding into her privacy a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff Videckis harm? 0 If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question 0.. Did Plaintiff Videckis prove by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant Pepperdine acted with malice, oppression, or fraud in intruding into her privacy? WhetheY your answer to question is yes or no, go to and answer question 0.. 0-00P- Case. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx) 00/'I~

Case :-cv-00-ddp-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 VIOLATION OF TITLE IX AND EDUCATION CODE X0 0. Did Plaintiff Haley Videckis suffer discrimination and/or harassment based upon her sexual orientation, and/or retaliation for making complaints about discrimination or harassment based upon her sexual orientation? If youy answer to question 0 is yes, answer question. If your answer to question 0 is no, go to and answer question S.. Was the discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation suffered by Plaintiff Videckis so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively deprived her of the right of equal access to educational benefits and opportunities? If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answey to question is no, go to and answer question S.. Did Defendant Pepperdine have actual knowledge of the 0 discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation suffered by Plaintiff Videckis? If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question S. /// /// /// ///. 0-00 00 / Case. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx) NAT FV VTTF(`KTQ

Case :-cv-00-ddp-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0. Did Defendant Pepperdine act with deliberate indifference in the face of its knowledge? If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question.. Did Plaintiff Videckis prove by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant Pepperdine acted with malice, oppression, or fraud? Whether your answer to question is yes or no, go to and answer question S. UNRUH CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. Did Defendant Pepperdine University deny full and equal access to accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services to Plaintiff Haley Videckis? ~~. If your answer to question S is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question.. Was Defendant Pepperdine's perception of Plaintiff Videckis' sexual orientation a substantial motivating reason for Defendant Pepperdine's conduct?. 0-00pp- Case. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx) 00/~I~

Case :-cv-00-ddp-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 If youy answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answey question.. Was Plaintiff Videckis harmed? ' If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answey to question is no, go to and answer question. 0. Was Defendant Pepperdine's conduct a substantial factor in causing harm to Plaintiff Videckis? Whether your answer to question is yes or no, go to and answer question fl'~ INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. Was Defendant Pepperdine University's conduct outrageous? 0 If your answer to question is yes, answer question 0. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question.. 0-00 - Case. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx) 00 / ~ VERDICT FORM HALEY VIDECKIS

Case :-cv-00-ddp-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: E:~ 0 0 0. Did Defendant Pepperdine intend to cause Plaintiff Videckis emotional distress or act with reckless disregard of the probability Plaintiff Videckis would suffer emotional distress? If your answer to question 0 is yes, answer question. If your answey to question 0 is no, go to and answer question.. Did Plaintiff Videckis suffer severe emotional distress? If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question.. Was Defendant Pepperdine's conduct a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff Videckis' severe emotional distress? If your answer to question is yes, answer question. If your answer to question is no, go to and answer question.. Did Plaintiff Videckis prove by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant Pepperdine acted with malice, oppression, or fraud?. Whether your answer to question is yes or no, go to and answer question. 0-00yp- '] Case. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx) 00/~~~

Case :-cv-00-ddp-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 DAMAGES. If you answered yes to questions,,, or then specify Plaintiff Haley Videckis' damages by inserting numbers in the blank spaces below. If you did not answer yes to any of these questions, do not insert any numbers in the blanks and have the presiding juror sign and date this form and submit it to the Court. a. Past economic loss $ b. Future economic loss $ c. Past noneconomic loss, including physical pain/mental suffering: $ d. Future noneconomic loss, including physical pain/mental suffering: $ TOTAL $ If youy answer to question is yes, then answer question.. If your answer to question was yes, what amount, if any, do you award as a penalty against Pepperdine for its violation of the Unruh Act: Once you have completed the verdict form, have the presiding juror sign and date it and submit it to the Court. DATED: ~~ ~,r ~~ ~-; fi. z ~ t. 0- ioo i ' $ Case. :-CV-00-DDP (JCx)