UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
|
|
- Octavia Newton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 1 1 GREGORY PATTON, CA No. 0; AZ No. 0 ROBERT A. MOSIER, CA No. 1, AZ No. 0 LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY PATTON One Thomas Building N. Central Avenue, Ste. 10 Phoenix, AZ 00 Telephone: (0) - Fax (0) - greg@gpattonlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Stacey Armato UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA STACEY ARMATO, an individual ) Case No. ) Plaintiff, ) ) COMPLAINT FOR ) DAMAGES (FEDERAL v. ) TORT CLAIM) ) JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED AND WILLIAM WISEMAN, employees of the ) Transportation Security Administration in their ) Individual capacities; JANET NAPOLITANO in ) her official capacity as Secretary of the ) Department of Homeland Security; THE ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) Homeland security; JOHN S. PISTOLE, in his ) Official capacity as Administrator of the ) Transportation Security Administration, and ) THE UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION ) SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; the UNITED ) STATES OF AMERICA; and DOES -; ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Invasion of Privacy (False Light); False Imprisonment; USC ; Federal Tort Claims Act) 1. Plaintiff Stacy Armato, a young mother from Calabasas, California at the
2 1 1 1 time of the events described in this Complaint, was retaliated against by agents of the TSA for advising them prior of their own guidelines regarding alternate screening for breast milk.. On February 1,, Mrs. Armato was traveling from Phoenix to Los Angeles with breast milk for her month old son s dinner feeding. She requested an alternate screening process for the breast milk so it was not exposed to radiation. Plaintiff even had a printout of the TSA s own guidelines guidelines that had been in effect since July, 0. These TSA agents, however, remembering her from the week before, retaliated against her for requesting alternate screening of her breast milk. Plaintiff was forced to stand in a glass enclosure in front of all the other passengers for over 0 minutes, where she was frequently harassed and abused by TSA agents. Plaintiff was specifically singled out for no other reason that to humiliate.. The conduct of the TSA officials constituted tortuous false imprisonment, false light invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress and violation of USC. Plaintiff brings this lawsuit in order to vindicate those rights. PARTIES. Plaintiff Stacey Armato was and is a resident of Los Angeles County at all times alleged herein.. Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe, and John Doe were employees of the Transportation Security Administration ( TSA ) working as screeners at a security checkpoint at the Phoenix International Airport at the time of the events giving rise to this action. Each was responsible for detaining Plaintiff at the screening area and, upon
3 1 1 1 information and belief, they summoned the TSA Supervisor WILLIAM WISEMAN ( WISEMAN ), as well as the Phoenix Police Department, for further interrogation, detention, and harassment of Plaintiff. Jane Does 1 and, and John Doe, are sued here in their individual capacities and in their capacity as emplyoees and agents of the TSA.. WILLIAM WISEMAN was an employee of the TSA at the time of the events giving rise to this action. Upon information and belief, WISEMAN held a position that involved supervising airport screeners, including Defendants Jane Does 1 and and John Doe ( TSA agents ). WISEMAN interrogated Plaintiff in a hostile and aggressive manner, continued her detention, refused to follow TSA guidelines, and humiliated and harassed Plaintiff bereft of justification. WISEMAN is sued in his individual capacity.. Defendant Janet Napolitano is the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and is a party hereto in her official capacity.. Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security is an agency of the United States of America.. Defendant John S. Pistole is the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and is a party hereto in his official capacity.. Defendant Transportation Security Administration is an agency of the United States of America.. Defendant United States of America is the appropriate defendant under the Federal Tort claims Act. 1. Defendants Janet Napolitano, Department of Homeland Security John S. Pistole, Transportation Security Administration and the United States of America are
4 1 1 1 referred to collective l herein as TSA. 1. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Doe Defendants 1- and Defendant WISEMAN were acting within the scope of their offices or employment with the TSA. 1. DOES 1-, and each of them were at all times mentioned herein, employees and supervisors of the TSA. Plaintiff is ignorant of the names of DOES 1- and for that reason, has sued said defendants as said fictitious names. Plaintiff will seek leave of the Court to amend this complaint to reflect said names when the same have been ascertained. NOTICE TO DOE DEFENDANTS. Plaintiff demands defendant United States Department of Homeland Security, defendant United States Transportation Security Administration and defendant United States of America immediately p0lace each and every TSA agent and supervisor, identified herein as DOE 1, DOE, DOE and DOES -, involved in Plaintiff s request for alternate screening of her breast milk on February 1, on notice of this lawsuit and that they may be named as a party to this lawsuit once their identity has been ascertained. Demand is also made through the Freedom of Information Act, that defendants United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Transportation Security Administration and the United States of America immediately identify the names and contact information of each and every TSA agent and supervisor involved in Plaintiff[ s request for alternate screening of her breast milk on February 1, and provide said information immediately to plaintiff. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5 This court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C., 1(a)(), 1(b) and USC.. This complaint is for money damages based upon the herein listed torts committed by agents/employees of the TSA.. On December,, Administrative Tort Claims were submitted by Plaintiff to the Transportation Security Administration via a Tort Claim Package. While the `TSA has acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff s claim it has not accepted or denied said claim. Since the TSA has not responded within six months of submittal of the claim, it is deemed denied. Plaintiff has therefore exhausted all administrative remedies and can now file suite in District Court.. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to U.S.C. 11(b) and 11(e). FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS. Plaintiff Stacey Armato, a resident of Los Angeles County, frequently flies to and from Phoenix for business purposes.. On February 1,, Plaintiff Stacey Armato was scheduled to fly on Southwest Airlines from Phoenix International Airport to Los Angeles International Airport.. After Plaintiff arrived at the airport, she waited in the line to go through the TSA screening checkpoint. Immediately upon arrival at the TSA screening checkpoint, Plaintiff requested to Jane Doe 1, an agent/employee of the TSA, that the breast milk, which she pumped out for her month old at home, not be put through the radiation x-ray
6 1 1 1 machine. Plaintiff requested that Jane Doe 1, an agent/employee of the TSA, perform the TSA approved alternative screening for medical liquids.. Just the week prior to February 1,, Plaintiff has requested that the same TSA agents, including DOES 1- and Defendant WIZSEMAN perform the alternate screening process for her breast milk, which was considered a medical liquid by the TSA s own guidelines. These same TSA agents, a week prior to February 1,, harassed Plaintiff for requesting alternate screening until confirming their own regulations. After confining Plaintiff for approximately 0 minutes and harassing Plaintiff for not simply pumping and dumping her breast milk, the TSA finally permitted her to pass through security with the alternate screening process for her breast milk. On that occasion, Plaintiff barely made her flight. Plaintiff filed a complaint with the TSA regarding this incident.. Being aware that the agents/employees of the TSA at the Phoenix Airport were not fully educated on the TSA s own guidelines and regulation regarding breast milk and the alternate screening process, Plaintiff printed out a copy of said regulations from the TSA website and placed it in one of her bags for the trip on February 1,.. Upon information and belief, however, the TSA agents at this specific security checkpoint decided to make an example and humiliate Plaintiff for filing a complaint against them the week prior.. Plaintiff specifically requested to Jane Doe 1, a female agent/employee of the TSA, that her breast milk not be x-rayed and that it go through alternate screening. Instead of acquiescing to Plaintiff s request, Jane Doe 1 placed Plaintiff in a special
7 1 1 1 Inspection area while Jane Doe 1 looked into the TSA s guidelines regarding breast milk. This Special Inspection area is a small standing-room only all-glass enclosure immediately next to the x-ray machine and in full sight of all passengers passing through the security check point.. Jane Doe, another female agent/employee of the TSA, then requested that Plaintiff identify her belongings that already went through the x-ray machine. Plaintiff attempted to locate a printed copy of the TSA rules located in one of her bags, but Jane Doe and John Doe aggressively pulled Plaintiff s hand away from her own bags and would not let her retrieve a copy of the TSA s guidelines. Plaintiff attempted to explain the TSA s guidelines regarding the alternate screening process for breast milk to Jane Doe and John Doe, and that she as in danger of missing her flight.. Jane Doe and John Doe would not listen to Plaintiff. After denying Plaintiff access to her bag to show the agents the TSA s own guidelines, which already went through x-ray screening, Jane Doe and John Doe forced Plaintiff to return to the special Inspection area. When Plaintiff requested to speak with a manager, her requests were refused and Plaintiff was told be quiet, to do as she was told and that she was not to move.. Upon information and belief, John Doe and/or other agents/employees of the TSA then called a uniformed police officer for the city of Phoenix to investigate the problem. 0. Plaintiff explained to the police officer for the City of Phoenix that she did not want her breast milk scanned by the radiation in the x-ray machine. She explained
8 1 1 1 that under TSA guidelines, breast milk was classified as a medical liquid and does not need to pass through an x-ray machine. 1. The police officer for the City of Phoenix informed Plaintiff that the TSA agents were waiting for her because Plaintiff had made this request in the past. Said police officer informed Plaintiff that the TSA remembered her from last week, that they saw her coming, and that they would have her arrested if she did not do exactly what they wanted. The police officer advised Plaintiff that she should go along with the TSA horse and pony show or he would b e forced to arrest her per the TSA s request.. After the police officer let, Plaintiff was forced by the TSA agents to continue to remain in the Special Inspection area. The agents for the TSA left her in this glass cage while numerous passengers passed through the security check point. After over minutes of getting no answers, and in danger of missing her flight to get back to her -month old son, she asked Jane Doe the status of the situation. Plaintiff was told she had to continue to wait in the glass cage.. After approximately minutes standing in the glass Special Inspection area, Jane Doe performed an additional physical body inspection while WISEMAN, a male agent/employee of the TSA and apparent manager, watched. This was after Plaintiff had already gone through the x-ray screening; she was unaware why she would then require a physical body inspection.. Following this intrusive physical body inspection, WISEMAN, a manager, refused to allow the alternate screening of her breast milk. Plaintiff was offered two choices by Jane Doe and WISEMAN: put the breast milk through the x-ray machine, or
9 1 1 1 dump it in the trash.. Plaintiff continued to cite the TSA guidelines regarding medical liquids to WISEMAN, as well as attempted to appeal to WISEMAN s moral character as she had a -month old son at home that needed the breast milk for dinner feeding (assuming she could even make her flight).. Finally, WISEMAN reviewed TSA s own guidelines that were printed by the Plaintiff However, to Plaintiff s shock and awe, WISEMAN blatantly refused to follow said guidelines and again refused Plaintiff s request for an alternative screening process for her breast milk. When Plaintiff pointed out the rule that breast milk is entitled to alternate screening WISEMAN stated well they aren t today. Plaintiff s frustration and humiliation were getting the best of her at that point she could tell these TSA agents were willing to do anything and everything possible to teach her a lesson, even after reading their own rules.. WISEMAN lectured Plaintiff for several additional minutes before finally telling Plaintiff that she could leave the security area and sit on the floor and pour her breast milk into eight 1. oz containers, and that Plaintiff must repeat the entire security screening process over again. WISEMAN then took photographs of Plaintiff s breast milk and wrote down Plaintiff s name, address and phone number on a scrap piece of paper and placed it in his pocket. The TSA agents then required Plaintiff, along with her luggage that had already been screened, to go back through the screening process again, patting down Plaintiff again and again and searching her items.. Needless to say, Plaintiff missed her flight to get home in time for her -
10 1 1 1 month old son.. Through the Freedom of Information Act, Plaintiff obtained nearly all the footage of this incident on video. However, approximately 0 minutes of the video were strangely missing, including the portion of the tape where WISEMAN demanded Plaintiff s personal information on a piece of paper which he put in his pocket and kept, as well as the portion where WISEMAN photographed Plaintiff s breast milk. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF: Federal Tort Claims Act False Imprisonment 0. Plaintiff s detention and imprisonment without probable cause or any other lawful grounds, as described in paragraphs 1-, constitute tort of false imprisonment under the laws of the State of Arizona. 1. Under the Federal Tort claims Act, Defendant United States of America is liable for these actions. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF: Federal Tort Claims Act False Light. The harassment, retaliation and imprisonment by the TSA agents of Plaintiff as described in paragraphs 1-1, was done in reckless disregard of the rights of Plaintiff. The TSA agents conduct, harassment and imprisonment of Plaintiff was an invasion of Plaintiff s privacy and placed Plaintiff in a false light that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person in the same and similar circumstances.. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, Defendant United States of America is
11 liable for these actions. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF: Federal Tort Claims Act Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. The harassment, retaliation and imprisonment of Plaintiff by Defendants as described in paragraphs 1-, was extreme and outrageous and was done intentionally and in reckless disregard that Plaintiff would suffer severe emotional distress.. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, Defendant United States of America is liable for these actions FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF: Federal Torts Claims Act USC. Defendant TSA agents conduct, harassment and imprisonment of Plaintiff as described in paragraphs 1-, was in retaliation for Plaintiff s filing a complaint against them and was done intentionally and in total disregard of Plaintiff s constitutional right to seek redress for her grievances causing Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress.. Under Federal Tort Claims Act, Defendant United States of America is liable for these actions. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the court enter a judgment including:
12 (a) (b) (c) (d) Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial; Punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial as to all Defendants except the United States of America; Reasonable attorneys fees and costs of suit; Prejudgment interest; and (e) Such other relief as the Court deems appropriate and just. PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A JURTY TRIAL ON ALL ISSUES SO TRIABLE DATED: December 1, LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY PATTON By /s/ Gregory A. Patton Gregory A. Patton Robert A. Mosier One Thomas Center North Central Avenue Suite 10 Phoenix, Arizona 00 greg@gpattonlaw.com (0) -
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Morris S. Getzels, Esq. (SBN 0 MORRIS S. GETZELS Law Office 0 Tampa Avenue, Suite 0 Tarzana, CA - Telephone ( -0 or ( -000 Facsimile ( - email: morris@getzelslaw.com
More informationCase: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1
Case: 3:12-cv-02380-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ALFONSO VASQUEZ-PALAFOX, ) ) No. Plaintiff, )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case Case 2:08-cv-02695-STA-tmp 2:08-zz-09999 Document Document 806 1 Filed Filed 10/15/2008 Page Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Destiny Payne, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:17-cv-01769 ) City of St. Louis, Vernon Betts, ) Charlene Deeken, Kimberly
More informationPRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------X Daniel McGowan : : Plaintiff, : : COMPLAINT AND -v- : DEMAND FOR A : JURY TRIAL United States
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationCase 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164
Case :-cv-000-rswl-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Genie Harrison, SBN Mary Olszewska, SBN 0 Amber Phillips, SBN 00 GENIE HARRISON LAW FIRM, APC W. th Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 T:
More informationCase 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION
Case 2:10-cv-01141-HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION VERSUS CITY OF COVINGTON, RICHARD PALMISANO, JACK WEST,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
1 1 1 Darrell J. York, Esq. (SBN 1 Sarah L. Garvey, Esq. (SBN 1 Law Offices of York & Garvey 1 N. Larchmont Blvd., #0 Los Angeles, CA 000 Telephone: ( 0- Facsimile: ( -0 Email: djylaw@gmail.com Email:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION SARAH COFFEY, KRIS HERMES, and ) COMPLAINT ERIN STALNAKER, ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY Plaintiffs, ) TRIAL v. ) ) DAVID LANGFELLOW, in his individual
More informationCase 4:16-cv CKJ Document 1 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff COMPLAINT
Case :-cv-00-ckj Document Filed 0/0/ Page of LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW C. DAVIDSON, LTD N Grand Ave, Suite Nogales, AZ - () -0 Matthew C. Davidson State Bar No. 00 MARCHETTI LAW, PLLC 0 N. Meyer Avenue Tucson,
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-01061 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN TAPIA and FELIPE HERNANDEZ, ) No. ) Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
,.," Case 2:10-cv-00258-RWS Document 1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION DR. JOESPH S. MOSES, JR., Plaintiff, Civil Action
More informationCase 1:18-at Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 15
Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0// Page of One Montgomery Street, Suite 000, San Francisco, California - 00..00 Fax.. 0 JEFFREY G. KNOWLES (State Bar No. ) JULIA D. GREER (State Bar No. 00) DANIEL M. PASTOR
More informationCase 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION
Case 5:17-cv-00007 Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION MARCEL C. NOTZON, III, Individually vs. CAUSE NO. CITY
More informationCase 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:12-cv-40120-WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ROBERTO CARLOS DOMINGUEZ, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationCourthouse News Service
0 0 A. James Clark, #000 CLARK & ASSOCIATES S. Second Avenue, Ste. E Yuma, AZ Telephone ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff KYLE HAWKEY, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff,
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 Anna Y. Park, SBN Michael Farrell, SBN U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION East Temple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( -1 E-Mail: lado.legal@eeoc.gov
More information)(
Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ERICA N. STEWART PLAINTIFF V. CAUSE NO.: TAROLD DURHAM and BELHAVEN UNIVERSITY DEFENDANTS COMPLAINT (JURY
More information3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
3:14-cv-03087-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 E-FILED Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 02:37:15 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case :0-cv-0-ROS Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0 0 JELLISON LAW OFFICES, PLLC 0 North Central Avenue Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) 0-0 E-mail: jim@jellisonlaw.com JAMES M.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DR. BOB RAJCOOMAR and DOROTHY RAJCOOMAR, Plaintiffs, CASE NO: v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SHAWN McCULLERS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DREW WILLIAMS, JASON PRICE, COURTNEY SHANNON vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CHARLESTON, JAY GOLDMAN, in his individual
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CYNTHIA HUFFMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 01-3144-ODS ) NEW PRIME, INC. d/b/a/ PRIME, INC. ) Serve Registered
More informationCase 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Thomas A. Saenz (State Bar No. 0) Denise Hulett (State Bar No. ) Andres Holguin-Flores (State Bar No. 00) MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND S.
More informationCase 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT
Case 1:12-cv-00574-S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND GENERAL JONES, Plaintiff vs. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, by and through
More informationCase 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00498-RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 LISA COLE, Plaintiff, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY DEPARTMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS COREY A. SCOTT, individually, DEMIR FISHER, individually, ARTIE MCFADDEN, a minor, by his next friend, JANETTE MCFADDEN, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV
Case 1:13-cv-00674-ACK-RLP Document 1 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 Anna Y. Park, CA SBN 164242 255 East Temple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-1108 Facsimile:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-1186 ) v. ) ) COMPLAINT HUFCOR, INC., d/b/a Total Quality
More informationCase 5:17-cv BRO-FFM Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-00-bro-ffm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Michael B. Garfinkel, Bar No. 00 MGarfinkel@perkinscoie.com Tyler D. Anthony, Bar No. 0 TAnthony@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP Century Park
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Paul Scott Seeman, Civil File No. Plaintiff, v. Officer Joshua Alexander, Officer B. Johns, Officer Michael Thul, Officers John Does 1-10, and City of
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW
3526.000 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DUPAGE ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION Douglas Walgren, Individually and as Independent Administrator
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Anthony J. Palik (SBN 01 LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ, INC. 0 Ninth Street, Suite Sacramento, CA Office: ( -1 Fax: ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff Jack Nichols UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
More informationCase 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-04082 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA MURPHY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationCase 1:12-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, v. No.
Case 1:12-cv-00066-JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAWRENCE MILLER 1285 Brentwood Road, NE Apartment # 3 Washington, DC 20019, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:10-cv WOB-JGW Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 210-cv-00097-WOB-JGW Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT COVINGTON TAMMY BROCK Case No. 382 Keegan Court Burlington,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DIVISION
Christy E. Lopez (# ) Kelli M. Evans (#1) RELMAN & ASSOCIATES 0 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Suite 0 Washington, D.C. 0 () - (telephone) () -0 (facsimile) Jayashri Srikantiah (#) Alan L. Schlosser (#) AMERICAN
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION DONNY MCGEE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF CHICAGO, CHICAGO POLICE ) DETECTIVE FARLEY, CHICAGO POLICE ) DETECTIVE LENIHAN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 3:08-cv-00052-KRG 3:05-mc-02025 Document 23 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 1 of of 9 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISA DOHNER, Civil Action vs. Plaintiff,
More informationIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION AHMED SALAU, ) Case No. P. O. BOX 6008, ) PRINCETON, WV 24740. ) Plaintiff, pro se ) vs. ) COMPLAINT CONSTANCE AGREGAARD,
More informationCase 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-00-gmn-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 COLLIN M. JAYNE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 00 South Seventh Street, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Introduction
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERITES UNION OF HAWAII FOUNDATION BRENT T. WHITE 7391 P.O. Box 3410 Honolulu, HI 96801 Telephone: (808 522-5907 Facsimile: (808 522-5909 Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationPlaintiff Edgar Castro for his Complaint against Defendants hereby alleges as
David W. Dow (#00) Ddowlaw1@gmail.com Jennifer L. Levine (#001) jlevine@ddowlaw.com DOW LAW OFFICE E. Camelback #1 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Office: 0..0 Direct: 0-0-1 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF
More informationCASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES
~~~~~~~SAS DEC 1 5 ZOOO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT R EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JAMES1P~COR~ CLE WESTERN DIVISION BY:~ bep CCEF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION PLAINTIFF VS. CASE NO.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION MONICA DANIEL HUTCHISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No.: 09-3018-CV-S-RED vs. ) ) Jury Trial Demanded TEXAS COUNTY,
More informationCase 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:14-cv-01601-BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7 PAMELA S. HEDIGER, OSB #913099 pam@eechlaw.com LAURIE J. HART, OSB #052766 laurie@eechlaw.com PO Box 781-0781 Telephone: 541.754.0303 Fax: 541.754.1455
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JONATHAN DANIEL, v. Plaintiff, THE CITY OF PEORIA, JIM ARDIS, Mayor of Peoria, in his individual capacity; PATRICK URICH, City Manager
More informationPlaintiffs, Tony Ivey, Jr., Kelvin Lamar James, and Faheem Loyal, through their
Lawrence S. Lustberg Avidan Y. Cover GIBBONS P.C. One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102-5310 (973) 596-4731 Edward Barocas Nadia Seeratan American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Foundation P.O.
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DR. BOB RAJCOOMAR and DOROTHY RAJCOOMAR, Plaintiffs, CASE NO: v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SHAWN McCULLERS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA Civil Action No: 8:03CV165 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY and/or OMAHA
More informationCase 3:12-cv PK Document 1 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID#: 1
Case 3:12-cv-01385-PK Document 1 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID#: 1 Rick Klingbeil, OSB No. 933326 Rick Klingbeil, P.C. 2300 SW First Avenue, Ste. 101 Portland, Oregon 97201 Phone: 503-473-8565 E-Mail
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION SOLEIL BONNIN 5901 Montrose Road, Apt. C802 Rockville, MD 20852 v. Plaintiff, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/2016 1058 AM INDEX NO. 157853/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/20/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationCase 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8
Case :0-cv-0-CW Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0 Chia-li S. Bruce, SBN Market Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( -00 Email: cshih@brucestone.us Michael Dalrymple (Pro Hac Vice
More informationCase 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:09-cv-00349-JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV- REBECCA LEACH, ) ) Complaint
More informationCase Case 1:07-cv RMB-JS 1:33-av Document Document Filed Filed 01/10/2007 Page Page 2 of 2 7 of 7 4. Defendants, Sergeant Gerard S
Case Case 1:07-cv-00141-RMB-JS 1:33-av-00001 Document Document 588-1 1 Filed Filed 01/10/2007 Page Page 1 of 1 7 of 7 Kenneth D. Aita, Esquire LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH D. AITA 126 White Horse Pike Haddon
More informationCase 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13
Case 3:17-cv-00071-DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION [Filed Electronically] JACOB HEALEY and LARRY LOUIS
More informationCase 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:17-cv-14382-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: KELLY DOE, vs. Plaintiff, EVAN CRAMER,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TERRENCE BRESSI, Case No. Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT. vs.
1 1 Ralph E. Ellinwood Ralph E. Ellinwood, Attorney at Law, PLLC SBA: 0 PO Box 01 Tucson, AZ 1 Phone: (0) 1- Fax: () 1- ree@yourbestdefense.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-00738-MJD-AJB Document 3 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Melissa Hill, v. Plaintiff, Civil File No. 12-CV-738 MJD/AJB AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
More informationCase 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Case :-cv-0-jls-jma Document Filed 0// Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - schwartz@cmslaw.com
More informationCase: 2:16-cv ALM-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/02/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1
Case 216-cv-00195-ALM-EPD Doc # 1 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 9 PAGEID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Officer Jeffrey Lazar Columbus Division of
More informationCase 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13
Case 4:16-cv-00648-JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION COURTNEY GRAHAM CASE NO. Plaintiff v. DRAKE UNIVERSITY/KNAPP
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00156-RC Document 1 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOHN TOPPINGS and STEPHANIE TOPPINGS, PLAINTIFFS,
More information4 Tel: ( Fax: (62 ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL HOLGUIN,
1 Dan Stormer (S.B. #101967) Yirginia Keeny (S.B. #139568) 2 HADSELL STORMER KEENY RICHARDSON & RENICK, LLP 3 128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Ste. 204 Pasadena~ CA 91103-3645 4 Tel: (626 585-9600 Fax: (62
More information~ Civil Action No. 5: 18 v 1~3- rr3 12-
Case 5:18-cv-00123-TBR Document 1 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION GARY S. V ANDER BOEGH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. BRANDI HARLESS,
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT ) KING DOWNING, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) MASSACHUSETTS PORT AUTHORITY; THE ) MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-0-gms Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 ERNEST GALVAN (CA Bar No. 0)* KENNETH M. WALCZAK (CA Bar No. )* ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP Montgomery Street, 0th Floor San Francisco, California 0- Telephone:
More informationINTRODUCTION. 1. This is an action, filed pursuant to U.S. Const. Amend. XIV, Title 42
8:17-cv-00280-JFB-CRZ Doc # 9 Filed: 08/01/17 Page 1 of 10 - Page ID # 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BRIENNE SPLITTGERBER ) CASE NO: 8:17-cv-280 ) Plaintiff, ) ) AMENDED
More informationLennox S. Hinds, Esq. Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C. 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, NJ
Case Case 3:07-cv-02314-JAP-JJH 1:33-av-00001 Document Document 939 1 Filed Filed 05/16/2007 Page Page 1 of 111 of 11 Lennox S. Hinds, Esq. Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C. 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, NJ
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline
Case 1:18-cv-00674 Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SANDEEP REHAL, Plaintiff, - against - HARVEY WEINSTEIN, THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY LLC, THE
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1
Case: 1:10-cv-05593 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION KURT KOPEK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY
More informationCase 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-0-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 MICHELLE P. CHUN FOOK; and YOLANDA C. COOPER, v. Plaintiffs, CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington
More informationCourthouse News Service
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X JANE DOE, -against- Plaintiff, COUNTY OF ULSTER, ULSTER COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,
More informationPlaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY WILLIE NEVIUS, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : Docket No. : vs. : : : COMPLAINT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ; : JOSEPH FUENTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY
More informationCase 1:17-cv JCB Document 5 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO.
Case 1:17-cv-10232-JCB Document 5 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) JUDITH BARRIGAS, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) THE HOWARD STERN
More informationChapter 6 Torts Byron Lilly De Anza College Byron Lilly De Anza College
Chapter 6 Torts 1 Common Torts Defamation = Libel and Slander Negligence False imprisonment Battery, Assault, Fraud Interference with a contract Commercial exploitation of another s identity or likeness
More informationCase 2:13-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:13-cv-00909-JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JENNIFER FINLEY, v. Plaintiff, WESTERN PENN WAXING, LLC; EUROPEAN
More information4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and
4:15-cv-04028-SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 E-FILED Friday, 13 March, 2015 05:01:04 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROCK ISLAND DIVISION
More information2:16-cv GCS-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 04/26/16 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:16-cv-11499-GCS-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 04/26/16 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MEGAN PEARCE, individually and as NEXT FRIEND of BABY
More informationCourthouse News Service
0 0 PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 0 JESHAWNA R. HARRELL, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. PRICE AND ASSOCIATES A Professional Law Corporation Telegraph Avenue, Ste. 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0
More informationTORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce
TORT LAW By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce INTRO TO TORT LAW: WHY? What is a tort? A tort is a violation of a person s protected interests (personal safety or property) Civil, not criminal
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION
Case 1:18-cv-00040-SPW Document 1 Filed 02/22/18 Page 1 of 16 Shahid Haque BORDER CROSSING LAW FIRM 7 West 6th Avenue, Ste. 2A Helena, MT 59624 (406) 594-2004 Matt Adams (pro hac vice application forthcoming)
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 00 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA PH (1) -00 FX (1) -01 www.rezlaw.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 DAVID A. LOWE (SBN 1) Email: dal@rezlaw.com MICHELLE G. LEE (SBN 1) Email: mgl@rezlaw.com
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 279 Filed 03/04/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Diana Rader, Plaintiff, C. A. No. v. City of Pittsburgh, Detective
More informationCase 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION
Case 4:08-cv-00139-RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION GEORGE VICTOR GARCIA, on behalf of himself and the class of
More informationCase 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Case No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) SUHA ELQUTT, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. (1) VIC REGALADO, in his official capacity as SHERIFF OF TULSA COUNTY; (2) GARNETT LEE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-VC Document Filed// Page of RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN 0) Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach Attorneys at Law Capp Street San Francisco, CA Telephone:..00; Fax:..0 Email: rachel@beachledermanlaw.com
More information9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8
9:12-cv-02672-PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION JULIE BANGERT, ) Civil Action #: ) PLAINTIFF,
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-08107 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION LAFAYETTE THOMAS, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
1:18-cv-11507-TLL-PTM Doc # 1 Filed 05/11/18 Pg 1 of 21 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN KATHLEEN A. LORENTZEN, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) COMPLAINT AND
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE L. V., a minor, by and through his parent and guardian, LENARD VANDERHOEF Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MARYVILLE and MARICE KELLY DIXON in his
More informationCase 1:17-cv JCB Document 1 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:17-cv-10232-JCB Document 1 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) JUDITH BARRIGAS, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) THE HOWARD STERN
More information