AAAS REPORT XXXIX RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FY Intersociety Working Group

Similar documents
Notice of Information Collection under OMB Emergency Review: Supplemental Questions for Visa Applicants (DS-5535),

GAO BUILDING SECURITY. Interagency Security Committee Has Had Limited Success in Fulfilling Its Responsibilities. Report to Congressional Requesters

From a Ph.D. to a Congressional Staffer

National Club Poster Presentation Contest. National Manuscript Contest

Science and Technology Policy for Astronomers. Ashlee N. Wilkins, PhD AAS Bahcall Public Policy

Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94 th th Congresses

IEEE-USA Policy Activities and 2013 Legislative Overview

Federal Research and Development Funding: FY2015

CRS Report for Congress

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Among

2016 Transition Activities

Case 2:07-cv RSL Document 51 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 12

Earl K. Long Library. Collection Development Policy for Federal Documents

Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for New England Congressional Delegation Members SENATE

Subtitle G Hemp Production

What to Look for as Congress Begins Work on 2017 Appropriations By David Reich

Notice. Navigant Consulting, Inc. Page 2

Congressional Action on FY2016 Appropriations Measures

NASA Budget and the Political Process

CRS Report for Congress

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

DETAILED CONTENTS. Acronyms and Abbreviations...xvii Preface...xxiii Acknowledgments...xxvii. Chapter 1. Health and Health Policy...

Effective Communications with Congressional Staff

The Social Costs of Underemployment Inadequate Employment as Disguised Unemployment

Congressional Action on FY2016 Appropriations Measures

Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection & Restoration Act Public Law , Title III (abbreviated summary of the Act, not part of the Act)

in this web service Cambridge University Press THE AMERICAN CONGRESS Ninth Edition

Weekl. the April 15. tax, which affects. what to pay. Rate. said

FY2011 Budget Documents: Internet and GPO Availability

Original language: English AC30 Doc. 6/PC24 Doc. 6 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

(a) Short title. This Act may be cited as the "Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2013". (b) Findings. The Congress makes the following findings:

Response to Draft Australia s Satellite Utilisation Policy. The Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (ATSE)

Access Legislation on Access to Forestry Literature

The Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA): Frequently Asked Questions

9-152 THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990

COMMITTEE ON ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS October 24 25, 2017

Review of Federal Agency Policies on Scientific Integrity

political law What Is Lobbying Under the LDA? January 2017 AUTHORS: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: Ronald M. Jacobs Who Is a Lobbyist? Lawrence H.

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 382

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Secretary of the Senate Office of Public Records 232 Hart Building Washington, DC

Omnibus Appropriations Acts: Overview of Recent Practices

Aerospace Department Chairs Association 2008 Annual Meeting Reno Hilton, Reno, NV January 8 th, 2008

Budget Reconciliation Process: Timing of Committee Responses to Reconciliation Directives

AIAA Associate Fellows Nomination Requirements

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Policy Paper Guidelines. Approved by the Public Policy Committee October 2017

A Guide to ISO 9001:2008 Compliance and the ITAR! How To Control Documents of External Origin! Explaining The Code of Federal Regulations! &!

Omnibus Appropriations Acts: Overview of Recent Practices

RSVP $ :00 NOON

Omnibus Appropriations Acts: Overview of Recent Practices

The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction

BY-LAWS OF THE HISTORICAL ASTRONOMY DIVISION. American Astronomical Society

Science & Congress: a scientist's perspective from inside the House of Representatives

FEDERAL CONTRACTS PERSPECTIVE Federal Acquisition Developments, Guidance, and Opinions

GSA Federal Advisory Committee Act Fundamentals

Energy Efficiency Bills in the Senate

What s New: Science Policy Updates

Federal Funding Gaps: A Brief Overview

Policy to Reduce US Greenhouse Gas Emissions American Chemical Society Briefing Washington DC June 4, 2008

Government Accountability Office The Congressional Watchdog. Office of Congressional Relations (202)

ENYC-GE Fall 2015 Instructor: Michelle D. Land ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY SYLLABUS

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science - Business & Economics - Reauthorization of the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation

Ester Sztein, PhD. Melody Brown Burkins, PhD

NSCA Research Committee (RC) Policies and Procedures

Re: "Final" EPA Chlorpyrifos, Diazinon, and Malathion Biological Evaluations Released on January 18, 2017

The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction

- 12 CHAP TER 3 TRANSITION OF IMO TO WHO. The development and organization of the CAgM/WMO is associated with the transition of the IMO to the WMO.

Minutes Commission VI March 17, Academy Office Building

Overview of GAO work on Nonemergency Medical Transportation

Case Document 1452 Filed in TXSB on 01/08/18 Page 1 of 6

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

COMPUTER SOFTWARE & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BACKGROUND PAPER

For purposes of this subpart:

The Political Economy of Exchange Rate Policy-Making

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES

Secretary of the Senate Office of Public Records 232 Hart Building Washington, DC

Older Americans Act: FY2015 Appropriations Overview

NCLIS U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science 1110 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 820, Washington, DC

FY2014 Budget Documents: Internet and GPO Availability

Industry News: Ford And General Motors To Close Flight Departments And Dispose Of Aircraft

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY CLAIMANTS' REPRESENTATIVES (NOSSCR)

The Deeming Resolution : A Budget Enforcement Tool

House Committee Party Ratios: 98 th -114 th Congresses

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ROCKY MOUNTAINS COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT

Suite Dupont Circle, N.W. Washington, D.C Tel: (202) Fax: (202)

Agenda. Welcoming Remarks and Introduction to Meeting Sessions Cindy Hope, FDP Chair and Sandy Schneider, FDP Vice-Chair

North Carolina Indigent Defense Manual Series John Rubin, Editor

CoNSORTiuM of SociAl SciENCE AssociATioNs

Congressional Budget Action for Fiscal Year 2012 and its Impact on Education Funding Jason Delisle, Federal Education Budget Project

Provisions of Law Named in George Bush s Signing Statements Inauguration through December 31, 2001

European Administrative Governance

SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO WATER ACTIVITY ENTERPRISE MINUTES January 17, 2013

MINUTES WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF EDUCATION Petersburg High School (Media Center) 207 Jefferson Avenue Petersburg, West Virginia October 10, 2018

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT between the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, and the Department of Commerce

Source: The authors extend their appreciation for the budget documents to the State of

Royal Society submission to the Migration Advisory Committee s Call for Evidence on EEA workers in the UK labour market

CURRICULUM VITAE WILLIAM F. WEST

THE FEDERALIZATION OF CRIMINAL LAW. Defending Liberty Pursuing Justice

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCES FEDERAL

Transcription:

AAAS REPORT XXXIX RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FY 2015 Intersociety Working Group AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005

The AAAS Board of Directors, in accordance with Association policy, has approved publication of this report as a contribution to the understanding of an important process. The interpretations and conclusions are those of the authors and do not purport to represent the views of the Board or the Council of the Association. Printed in the United States of America Copyright 2014 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005

Intersociety Working Group (see the Directory at the end of this report for contact information) American Association for the Advancement of Science American Astronomical Society American Chemical Society American Educational Research Association American Geosciences Institute American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics American Institute of Biological Sciences American Institute of Physics American Mathematical Society American Meteorological Society American Physical Society American Psychological Association American Society of Agronomy American Society for Nutrition American Society of Mechanical Engineers Association of American Universities Association of Public and Land-grant Universities Computing Research Association Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes at Arizona State Consortium of Social Science Associations Council on Competitiveness Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics Crop Science Society of America Ecological Society of America Federation of Animal Science Societies Geological Society of America Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers-USA Institute of Food Technologists Materials Research Society Soil and Water Conservation Society Soil Science Society of America

Contents List of Tables Preface PART I: OVERVIEW Highlights 3 Chapter 1 Federal R&D : 5 An Introduction Matt Hourihan, AAAS Chapter 2 Historical Trends in Federal R&D 25 Matt Hourihan, AAAS Chapter 3 Political and Policy Context 31 for the FY 2015 Budget Joanne Padrón Carney, AAAS Chapter 4 Education and Workforce Development 39 Christine Grant, Yolanda L. Comedy, and Shirley M. Malcom, AAAS Overview Tables 55 PART II: AGENCY R&D BUDGETS Chapter 5 Department of Defense 71 Travis Doom, CSPO Chapter 6 National Science Foundation 79 Amy Scott and Tobin Smith, AAU Chapter 7 National Institutes of Health 87 Erin Heath, AAAS Chapter 8 Department of Energy 95 Mark T. Elsesser and Michael S. Lubell, APS Chapter 9 National Aeronautics and 103 Space Administration Steven Howell, AIAA vii ix

Chapter 10 U.S. Department of Agriculture 113 Elizabeth Allred, Eddie G. Gouge, and Ian L. Maw, APLU Chapter 11 Department of Homeland Security 121 Jodi Lieberman, APS Chapter 12 Other Selected Agencies 129 (Commerce, DOT, Interior, EPA, VA) Kasey Shewey White, GSA; Heather Kelly, APA; and Sara Spizzirri, AAAS Agency Tables 139 Historical Tables 171 PART III: DISCIPLINARY ANALYSES Chapter 13 Physics 181 Christopher J. Mustain, COC; and Aline D. McNaull, AIP Chapter 14 Astronomy and Astrophysics 189 Joshua H. Shiode and Joel R. Parriott, AAS Chapter 15 Weather and Climate 195 Paul A.T. Higgins and Shalini Mohleji, AMS Chapter 16 Geosciences 201 Abigail Seadler and Maeve Boland, AGI Chapter 17 Biological and Ecological Sciences 207 Julie Palakovich Carr, AIBS; and Terence Houston, ESA Chapter 18 Chemical Sciences 213 Keri A. Moss, Caroline M. Trupp Gil, and Katherine P. Weber, ACS Chapter 19 Social and Behavioral Science Research 219 Wendy Naus and Angela L. Sharpe, COSSA; Heather Kelly and Patricia Kobor, APA; and Gerald E. Sroufe and Christy Talbot, AERA

Chapter 20 Federal Statistics 227 Katherine R. Smith, COPAFS Chapter 21 Mathematical Sciences 233 Samuel M. Rankin, III, AMS Chapter 22 Computing Research 239 Peter Harsha and Brian Mosley, CRA Chapter 23 National Nanotechnology Investment 245 M. C. Roco, ASME Chapter 24 Electrotechnology-Related Research 255 Chris J. Brantley and James Savage, IEEE-USA Chapter 25 Mechanical Engineering 263 Dan Deckler, ASME Chapter 26 Materials Science 271 Ronald L. Kelley, MRS Chapter 27 Food, Nutrition, Agriculture, and Natural 277 Resource Sciences Bethany Johns, ASA, CSSA, SSSA; Sarah Ohlhorst, ASN; Jianrong (Janet) Zhang, IFT; Lowell Randel, FASS; Jim Gulliford, SWCS Appendix 1: The Federal Budget Process 101 289 Appendix 2: Methodology and Data Sources 293 Appendix 3: Definitions 295 Appendix 4: COSEPP 297 Appendix 5: Intersociety Working Group Directory 298

List of Tables OVERVIEW TABLES Table I-1. R&D by Agency 57 Table I-2. Distribution of the FY 2015 Budget 58 Table I-3. Historical Trends in R&D and Federal Outlays 59 Table I-4. Major Functional Categories of R&D 60 Table I-5. Defense and Nondefense R&D by Character of Work 61 Table I-6. Federal Homeland Security R&D by Agency 62 Table I-7. R&D Funding by Congressional Appropriations Subcommittee 63 Table I-8. Interagency Science and Technology Initiatives 64 Table I-9. R&D Expeditures at Colleges and Universities 65 Table I-10. Historical Tables: Federal R&D by Agency, FY 2005-2015 66

AGENCY TABLES Table II-1. R&D by Agency and Character of Work 139 Table II-2. Department of Defense 146 Table II-3. DOD R&D by Military Departments and Agencies 147 Table II-4. Department of Defense Basic Research ( 6.1 ) 148 Table II-5. Department of Defense S&T ( 6.1 6.3 ) 149 Table II-6. Department of Homeland Security 150 Table II-7. National Science Foundation 151 Table II-8. Department of Health and Human Services 153 Table II-9. National Institutes of Health by Institute 154 Table II-10. National Institutes of Health by Funding Mechanism 155 Table II-11. Department of Energy 156 Table II-12. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 160 Table II-13. U.S. Department of Agriculture 163 Table II-14. Department of Commerce 164 Table II-15. Department of Transportation 165 Table II-16. Department of the Interior 166 Table II-17. Environmental Protection Agency 167 Table II-18. Department of Education 168 Table II-19. Department of Veterans Affairs 169 Table II-20. The Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative 170 Note: Tables within chapters are not included in this list.

HISTORICAL TABLES Table III-1. Department of Defense 173 Table III-2. Military Departments and Agencies 174 Table III-3. National Science Foundation 175 Table III-4. National Institutes of Health 176 Table III-5. Department of Energy 177 Table III-6. U.S. Department of Agriculture 178

Preface Scientific research and development (R&D) continue to be of vital importance to the United States in the 21st century, and the federal role in supporting the national science enterprise remains substantial. The President s annual budget submission and the congressional debate that ensues are the mechanisms through which that role is defined and embellished. Since 1976, AAAS has published an annual report analyzing federal R&D in the proposed budget, to make timely and objective information about the Administration s plans available to the scientific and engineering communities and to policymakers. It originally began in-house at AAAS, under the auspices of the Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (Appendix 5). Shortly thereafter, it became a collaborative effort, and it now involves contributors from more than two dozen scientific, engineering, higher education, and industrial associations known collectively as the Intersociety Working Group (see the Appendix 5 directory at the end of this report for contact information for each association). This year marks the 39th in the series. Ordinarily, this report is issued at the annual AAAS Forum on Science and Technology Policy, held in Washington, DC in late April or early May. However, the late release of the President s budget has again necessitated a delay in our own publishing schedule. Still, we hope that a late release will not prevent readers from finding these analyses useful, even as the current appropriations cycle appears set to follow regular order, at least for the time being. The structure of this report parallels recent editions. Part I provides an overview of the budget, the political context of FY 2015, and analyses of major funding trends, as well as funding for science, engineering, and mathematics education. Part II examines the proposed R&D budget by agency and department. Finally, Part III includes cross-cutting analyses that cover the R&D budget by discipline. Tables are interspersed through the volume. Readers should be aware that chapters have been prepared largely independently of one another and under extremely tight deadline pressure. Although every effort has been made to assure a high quality

product, some overlap and inconsistencies among the chapters are, unfortunately, inevitable. Many of the chapters reuse a substantial amount of text from prior editions of this report. In most cases, the authorship of the chapters is relatively consistent from year to year, though there is always some change. The Intersociety Working Group hereby acknowledges the efforts of past authors and contributors to this annual report. On behalf of the members of the Intersociety Working Group, we would like to express our appreciation to the officers, members, and staffs of the participating organizations for their support and assistance in preparing this report. Thanks also to the AAAS Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy, which initiated the R&D Program and periodically reviews it and provides guidance to it. We are very grateful to individuals in the Office of Management and Budget, in agency budget offices, on congressional staffs, and elsewhere who aided us in collecting the information and advised us on its interpretation. Matt Hourihan April 2014