V/s. Uttranchal Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd; (UJJWAL) Maharani Bagh, GMS Road, Dehradun. V/s

Similar documents
BEFORE THE H.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AT SHIMLA

BEFORE THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION SHIMLA

BEFORE THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SHIMLA.

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Investigate and to take appropriate action against M/s Torrent and further to cancel the

Suo-Motu Petition No. 2/2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY MATTER. Date of Decision : January 16, 2007 W.P.(C) 344/2007

BEFORE THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SHIMLA. The H.P. State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Shimla-4

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SHIMLA. M/s India Steel, Village Palhori, Tehsil Poanta Sahib,Distt. Sirmour,H.P.

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW

MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BHOPAL

In the matter of: M/s Rauzagaon Chini Mills (A unit of Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd.) Rauzagaon , District Barabanki (U.P.

ORDER (Hearing on & )

MYT PETITION FOR THIRD CONTROL PERIOD FY TO FY

BEFORE THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SHIMLA

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI WATER BOARD ACT, Date of decision: 4th February, 2011.

Draft Supplementary Power Purchase Agreement

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. AA No.396/2007. Date of decision: December 3, Vs.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

BEFRE THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SHIMLA.

ORDER (Date of Hearing : 23 rd November, 2010) (Date of Order : 24 th November, 2010)

UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW. Notice dated U/s130 of Electricity Act2003.

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 29 th November, 2017 Pronounced on: 08 th December versus

Respondents. Present in the Hearing: Respondents

THE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri I. B. Pandey, Member

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI (Case No.23/ ) QUORUM Shri Mukhtiar Singh, Chairperson Shri P. C. Verma, Member.

Petition No 768 of 2011 BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW. Date of Order :

Case No. 17 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., Santacruz (E).

'8. Sue ~ /44 tie. HIMACHAL PRADESH SUTE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED -, (A State Govt. Undertaking)

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI. Case No. 21 & 23 of 2010 ORDER

order imposes the following restrictions on the petitioner:-

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, LUCKNOW. Petition No.: 960/2014

Sub: In the matter of representation in compliance to the directions of Hon ble High Court, Jabalpur in Writ Petition no.

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri I. B. Pandey, Member

WATER POWER. The Water Power Act. being

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 28 th January, W.P.(C) 9828/2015. Versus

National Electric Power Regulatory Authority Islamic Republic of Pakistan

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB. P. 537/2016. versus J U D G M E NT

GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (GERC)

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri I. B. Pandey, Member

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Thiruvananthapuram. November 27, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Before the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Bhopal

Case No. 94 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member

SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT. This SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made on this day of.., 20..,

North.West Frontier Province

M/s. BLA Power Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner. 4. M. P. Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd., Bhopal -Respondents

ACT, (Haryana Act No. 9 of 2006)

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.

Case No. 02 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri S. B. Kulkarni, Member Shri V. L. Sonavane, Member

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1374 OF 2008

IAS Part 54. IAS Part 54. WHEREAS, The Leon Waldman Discretionary Trust (the "Trust"), as plaintiff,

CHAPTER 27 EMINENT DOMAIN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos of Versus. Versus

an industrial workman; or

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION. W.P.(C) 1972/2011 and CMs 4189/2011, 4729/2011, 12216/2011

1. The Chief Engineer (OP).

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN. Writ Petition Nos /2017 (T-IT)

MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATIORY COMMISSION BHOPAL. ORDER (Date of Order : 7 th September, 2012)

Petition No 973 of 2014 and 1036,1037,1038,1039 &1040 of 2015 BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW

BEFORE THE GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AT GANDHINAGAR PETITION NO OF 2017

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Co.Pet. 787/2015 BANDHU SYSTEMATIX PRIVATE LIMITED...PETITIONER. Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate.

Order on. Petition No. 38/2013

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No of versus

BELIZE ELECTRICITY ACT CHAPTER 221 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos of 2012)

APPENDIX V ESCROW BOND AGREEMENT

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

ORDER Dated: 11 th August, 2004

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 27 th January, ARB. P. No.373/2015. versus

National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Wheeling of Electric Power) Regulations, 2015

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, LUCKNOW

Bar & Bench (

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora

Title 8 Laws of Bermuda Item 2 BERMUDA 1955 : 36 SUPREME COURT (RECORDS) ACT 1955 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

~~. HPSEBL./ CE (Comm.)/S-4/Vol-Ill/ ,\.\ h 1- 'CO \Y Dated: a 5/D ~ /2P If::,

Case No. DH/CGRF-1595/2017 Date of Institution: Date of Hearing: Date of Order: 25/01/2017

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI. Petition No. 119/MP/2013. Date of Hearing: Date of Order :

165 FERC 61,016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ACCEPTING TARIFF REVISIONS. (Issued October 12, 2018)

THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, LUCKNOW

Case No. 61 of In the matter of. Petition of Wardha Power Company Ltd. for Review of Order dated 17 January, 2014 in Case No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)No. 905 OF Versus. University Grants Commission and Ors.

ICC Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration 1975

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) NO.4707/2010. % Date of decision: 6 th December, Versus MAHAVIR SR. MODEL SCHOOL & ORS.

Case No. 167 of Coram. Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Chairperson Shri. Azeez M. Khan, Member Shri. Deepak Lad, Member

BIHAR ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

CASE No. 173 of Coram. Shri Anand B. Kulkarni, Chairperson Shri Mukesh Khullar, Member

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Mr. Vivek Madhok & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR.

National Electric Power Regulatory Authority Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13 th floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

Transcription:

Petition No. 79/2007 2008-09 for DHAKRANI generating station of Uttranchal Jal 3. U.P. Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd, Petition No. 80/2007 2008-09 for CHIBRO generating station of Uttranchal Jal 1

3. U.P. Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd, Petition No. 81/2007 2008-09 for KHODRI generating station of Uttranchal Jal 3. U.P. Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd, Petition No. 82/2007 2008-09 for DHALIPUR generating station of Uttranchal Jal 2

3. U.P. Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd, Petition No. 83/2007 2008-09 for KULHAL generating station of Uttranchal Jal tariffs for its Electricity Generation Stations under section 62 1. Uttanchal Power Corporation Ltd; Dehradun 2. H.P. State Electricity Board (Petition Nos. 79/2007, 80/2007, 81/2007, 82/2007 and 83/2007) CORAM YOGESH KHANNA CHAIRMAN Counsel (Date of Decision 7.5.2008) for for the petitioners Sh. T.S. Chauhan Advocate for H.P. State Electricity Board Sh. Bimal Gupta Advocate for Uttranchal Power Corporation -- Dehradun for U.P. Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd; Lucknow Sh. B.S. Goel. 3

Order (Last heard on 29.3.2008 and order reserved) The petitioner Uttranchal Jal Vidyut Ltd (UJVNL), UJJWAL, Maharani Bagh, GMS Road, Dehradun, which is a registered company constituted by the Govt. of Uttranchal, under section 63 (4) of the U.P. Reorganisation Act, 2000, has moved five petitions i.e. 79/2007, 80/2007, 81/2007, 82/2007 and 83/2007 for determination of the generation tariff of five hydro generating stations viz. Dhakrani, Chibro, Khodri, Dhalipur and Kulhal, owned and operated by the petitioner UJVNL, for the financial years 2005-06 to 2008-09, under sections 62 and 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 2. An agreement was signed between the State of erstwhile UP and the State of Himachal Pradesh on 21.11.1972, for supply of Power from its 5 inter State Hydro Stations, which inter-alia, states that:- (i) Certain components/portions of the Yamuna Hydel scheme come under the territory of the State of Himachal Pradesh and the Uttar Pradesh Govt. utilize the waters contributed partly from the catchment area in Himachal Pradesh. (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) The usage rights of water of the Yamuna, and its tributaries (including the river Tons) emanating from the Himachal Pradesh territory, upstream of Yamuna Hydel Scheme will be conveyed by H.P. exclusively to UP for the purpose of power development, but subject to any existing facilities of irrigation, running of water mills and transport of timber enjoyed by the people of HP being safeguarded. The H.P. Govt. reserves the rights to develop power themselves from any river or stream inside their own territory, provided such development does not reduce the natural flow and supply of water or otherwise adversely affect the said Yamuna Hydel Scheme. H.P. shall share 25% of the total energy generated from the power stations of Yamuna Hydel Scheme stage-i and stage-ii (Dhakrani, Dhalipur, Chibro, Khodri hydro project, less energy consumed in the maintenance and operation of these power stations. The share of energy of H.P. of Yamuna stage-i will be made available to H.P. at the bus bars against payment at the cost of generation of power stations of Yamuna Hydel Scheme stage- II, the cost of generation to be paid by H.P. shall be the pooled cost of generation at the bus bars of both stage-i & II. H.P. shall not share the capital cost of the said scheme. 4

3. An important aspect of agreement between the States of Uttranchal (erstwhile U.P.) and the State of Himachal Pradesh is that H.P. Government reserves the right to develop power from any river or stream inside its own territory, provided such development does not reduce the natural flow and supply of water or otherwise adversely affects the Yamuna Hydel Scheme. The said agreement further stipulates that:- (i) (ii) Himachal Pradesh shall not share the capital cost of the said scheme, and The share of energy of Himachal Pradesh from these 5 stations of Yamuna Hydel Scheme will be made available to HPSEB at the bus bars at the cost of generation. 4. None of the aforementioned power stations is within the territory of H.P., but the power in pursuance of the agreement is to be supplied/released in the areas falling in the State of H.P. Thus apart from the provisions of section 62 and 86, the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which read as under, has also been invoked:- (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in Part X, the tariff for any inter-state supply, transmission or wheeling of electricity, as the case may be, involving the territories of two States may, upon application made to it by the parties intending to undertake such supply, transmission or wheeling, be determined under this section by the State Commission having jurisdiction in respect of the licensee who intends to distribute electricity and make payment therefor. 5. These petitions, after scrutiny and removal of deficiencies, were admitted for consideration and subsequently, after due process and providing opportunity to the respondents/stakeholders, the pleadings were completed. These petitions are pending for adjudication before the Commission and proceedings are in advance stage of disposal. 6. The HPSEB in its application dated 14.12.2007, in para No. 6, 27 and 28 and UPJVNL, in its application dated 12.12.2007, have specifically stated that this Commission has no jurisdiction to decide the present petitions. The applicant-petitioner, conceding the stand taken by the respondents UPJVNL and HPSEB, has now prayed for withdrawal of the said petitions with the liberty to file them before the appropriate Commission. This application is accompanied by a request for refund of the filing fee already deposited by the petitioner. 5

7. The respondents have no objection for the withdrawal of the tariff petitions filed by the petitioner for determination of the generation tariff for its generating stations namely, Dhakrani, Chibro, Khodri, Dhalipur and Kulhal for the financial years 2005-06 to 2008-09. In regard to the refund of the filing fee deposited by the petitioner, the attention is invited to sub-regulation (4) of regulation 58 of the HPERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2005 which empowers the Commission to waive the amounts of fees provided in the said regulations. 8. In view of the foregoing discussion and after taking into consideration the circumstances of the case, the advance stage of proceedings and to advance the cause of justice the Commission dismisses the tariff petitions, filed by the petitioner for determination of the generation tariff for its five generating stations namely, Dhakrani, Chibro, Khodri, Dhalipur and Kulhal, as withdrawn with the liberty to file them before the appropriate Commission and orders the Secretary of the Commission to refund 60 percent of the filing fee deposited by the petitioner in each of the withdrawn petition, within thirty days of this order. This order is passed and signed on 7th day of April, 2008. (Yogesh Khanna) Chairman. 6