The 2014 Legislative Elections

Similar documents
2010 Legislative Elections

2016 State Elections

2008 Legislative Elections

On Election Night 2008, Democrats

Who Runs the States?

2018 State Legislative Elections: Will History Prevail? Sept. 27, 2018 OAS Episode 44

SS7 CIVICS, CH. 8.1 THE GROWTH OF AMERICAN PARTIES FALL 2016 PP. PROJECT

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

Presidential term: Lived: Occupations: Planter, Lawyer. Vice Presidents: Aaron Burr, George Clinton

About the Survey. Rating and Ranking the Presidents

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Expansion and Reform. (Early 1800s-1861) PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. By Daniel Casciato

Obama Leaves on a High Note Yet with Tepid Career Ratings

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

The United States Presidential Election Process: Undemocratic?

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

2018 MIDTERMS PRE- ELECTION OVER VIEW OCTOBER 2018

THE 2008 ELECTION: 1 DAY TO GO October 31 November 2, 2008

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

mith College Computer Science Lecture Notes Week 11 Everyday Python CSC111 Spring 2015 Dominique Thiébaut

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Background Information on Redistricting

Presidents of the United States Cards

LSP In-Class Activity 5 Working with PASW 20 points Due by Saturday, Oct. 17 th 11:59 pm ANSWERS

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

THE STATE OF VOTING IN 2014

Redistricting in Michigan

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT President & Domestic Policy October 11, Dr. Michael Sullivan. MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

ACHIEVE GREATER SUCCESS IMPROVE AND LEVERAGE YOUR LEADERSHIP STRENGTHS DAN NIELSEN

ELECTION OVERVIEW. + Context: Mood of the Electorate. + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward?

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

The Constitution of the United States of America

Presidential Project

Political Report: September 2010

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

Mountain Green Elementary School 5 th Grade Great American Award

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

The Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave?

Submission of the President s Budget in Transition Years

Fuzzy Math: Wrong Way Reforms for Allocating Electoral College Votes

After a tumultuous and bitter

Why The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

THE 2012 ELECTIONS A LOOK AHEAD DOUG SOSNIK MAY 31, 2012

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

2. A bitter battle between Theodore Roosevelt and his successor, William H. Taft, led to.

THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth

In the Margins Political Victory in the Context of Technology Error, Residual Votes, and Incident Reports in 2004

The US Electoral College: the antiquated key to presidential success

Research Skills. 2010, 2003 Copyright by Remedia Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.

The White House and Press Timeline Compiled January 2017

American Presidential Elections. The American presidential election system has produced some interesting quirks, such as...

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Our American States An NCSL Podcast

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

Judicial Selection in the States

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits

Affordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation

Red Shift. The Domestic Policy Program. October 2010

Discussion Guide for PRIMARIES in MARYLAND: Open vs. Closed? Top Two/Four or by Party? Plurality or Majority? 10/7/17 note without Fact Sheet bolded

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

Regular Vetoes and Pocket Vetoes: An Overview

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

Franklin D. Roosevelt To George W. Bush (Education Of The Presidents) READ ONLINE

ELECTION ANALYSIS. & a Look Ahead at #WomenInPolitics

at New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting

Regular Vetoes and Pocket Vetoes: An Overview

The Federalist Era:

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

Contemporary United States

Congressional Redistricting Decisions, 2011

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

The Keys to the White House: Updated Forecast for 2008

EXPLORING PARTISAN BIAS IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE,

Mathematics of the Electoral College. Robbie Robinson Professor of Mathematics The George Washington University

It s Democrats +8 in Likely Voter Preference, With Trump and Health Care on Center Stage

Strategy Monthly. Election Night Scorecard. November 4, 2016

Regional Variations in Public Opinion on the Affordable Care Act

Post-War United States

Applying Ranked Choice Voting to Congressional Elections. The Case for RCV with the Top Four Primary and Multi-Member Districts. Rob Richie, FairVote

The US Economy: Are Republicans or Democrats Better?

The Stage is set for a Direction Changing November Election

This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Separation of Powers

Overview. Strategic Imperatives. Our Organization. Finance and Budget. Path to Victory

2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA

Museum of World Treasures

CRS Report for Congress

American Dental Association

United States: Implications of the Midterm Elections for Economic Policy

Does Primary Parity Lead to the Presidency?

What Happened on Election Day

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

MEMORANDUM. I wanted to review for your information how your efforts and your RNC were critical in making those historic gains possible.

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Transcription:

The 2014 Legislative Elections By Tim Storey The 2014 election resulted in Republican dominance of state legislative control unmatched in nearly a century. Riding a surge of disaffection with a president in the sixth year of office, combined with low, midterm voter turnout among Democrats, Republicans won big. They also continued to benefit from a built in redistricting advantage stemming from the 2010 election success by the party. Essentially, everything went one direction in the 2014 election the direction of the Grand Old Party. The GOP gained more than 300 legislative seats nationwide in November 2014, giving the party control of 30 statehouses and 4,100 of the nation s 7,383 legislative seats. That is the most seats since 1920 and the most legislative chambers in the history of the Republican Party. The 2014 election was a GOP landslide in nearly every sense of the word. However, the numerical gains for the party were not overly impressive because Republicans were so successful in 2010, and to a lesser degree in 2012. There simply were not enough seats in play to make large seat gains. In the 2010 election, Republicans added more than 720 legislative seats to their ranks. Republican success in state elections in 2014 came as no surprise. Midterm elections almost always spell trouble for the party holding the White House. With Democratic incumbent President Barack Obama at the midpoint of his final term in 2014, Republican strategists knew it was only a question of how high they could go. In the 29 midterm election cycles since 1902 including 2014 the party of the president has lost legislative seats in 27 of them. That s an abysmal winning percentage of only 7 percent. Or, from the opposite perspective, the party not residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., wins seats in state legislatures in midterms 93 percent of the time. Even though many Democratic state legislative candidates tried to distance themselves from President Obama while on the campaign trail and amid talk about an improving U.S. economy, they couldn t overcome one of the most consistent historic trends in all of American politics. In only two midterm elections has the party in the White House added to its legislative numbers. In 1934, at the height of the Great Depression, voters backed Franklin Roosevelt s Democrats. And in 2002 as the nation continued to react to the attacks of September 11th the previous year, Republicans gained 177 legislative seats in George W. Bush s first midterm. Record GOP Control of Legislative Chambers There are 99 state legislative chambers in the 50 states. Nebraska voters changed their constitution in 1934, making the state the only one in the nation with a unicameral legislature. Nebraska s constitutional amendment also mandated that candidates for The Unicameral, as it is now called, run in nonpartisan elections. So, there are 98 partisan legislative chambers in the U.S. After their sweep in the 2014 elections, Republicans have the majority in twothirds of those partisan chambers an unprecedented high water mark for the party of Lincoln. In 2014, Republicans won enough seats from Democrats in specific states to add 11 legislative chambers to their side. Democrats did not switch any Republican chambers to their control. This was an echo of 2010, when Republicans shifted 22 chambers to their column and lost none. No legislative bodies are currently tied, which is relatively unusual. Typically, there will be one or two chambers in the country that wind up with even numbers of Democrats and Republicans every two years. For almost 30 years 1984 until 2012 at least one chamber was tied. More Partisan Metrics Regular legislative elections were held in 46 states in 2014 for 6,049 of the 7,383 legislative seats. Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey and Virginia hold legislative elections in odd-numbered years. In four states Kansas, Minnesota, New Mexico and South Carolina the senates were not up. All senators in those states were elected to four-year terms in 2012. The Council of State Governments 55

Figure A: 2015 State Legislative Partisan Control Republican (30) Democrat (11) Split (8) Nonpartisan (1) Republicans control both chambers of the legislature in 30 states, up from 27 states in 2014 before the election. Conversely, Democrats control the legislature in only 11 states, a drop from 19 preelection. The two parties have shared control of the legislature in eight states, with one party holding the senate and the other one having the house. The number of divided states remains relatively low, although up from the historic low of four between the 2012 and 2014 elections. It has been more than 10 years since the number of divided states was in double digits. Republicans added nearly 320 legislative seats to their bottom line in 2014. When legislative sessions began in January of 2015, there were 4,125 state legislators who were elected as Republicans, the most Republican legislators in nearly a century. There were 4,363 Republican legislators after the 1920 election when Warren Harding became president. The most legislative seats ever held by either party happened in 1974, when 5,100 of the nation s legislators 68.1 percent were Democrats. Republicans now control 56.5 percent of the partisan seats in state legislatures. Third party state legislators make up only 0.4 percent of all legislative seats; 30 legislators are neither Democrats nor Republicans. The Vermont House accounts for nearly half of the 30 third party lawmakers in the country, where six are progressives and six are independent. Regional Overview The post-2014 partisan legislative map is decidedly red in hue in every region of the country. The only blue on the map, where Democrats remain in charge of the whole legislature, shows up almost entirely in states that border the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Vermont and Illinois are the only Democratic states without a saltwater coastline. Republicans expanded their ranks in every region of the nation in 2014. They added seats in Southern states where they are the strongest for the fourth consecutive election cycle. The relatively swift increase of Republican dominance in Southern states is nothing short of remarkable. Prior to the 1990 election, only 25 percent of legislators in the South were Republican. Democrats held the majority of every legislative 56 The Book of the States 2015

body south of the Mason-Dixon Line. Since 1982, Republicans have increased their numbers of legislative seats in the South in every single election cycle except for 2006. They now control 62.5 percent of Southern legislative seats. More importantly, every chamber in the region, except for the Kentucky House, has a GOP majority and leader. Many pundits thought Republicans were poised to win the Kentucky House in their 2014 sweep, yet Democrats didn t lose a single seat in the chamber, making it a rare bright spot for the party. Table A: Republican Percent of Seats Held by Region, 2015 East... 44.4% South... 62.5% Midwest... 63.3% West... 56.1% Chambers that Flipped In every two-year election cycle, an average of 13 legislative chambers shift party control. Typically, one party claims the bulk of the switches, and the less fortunate party snags a couple, thus having a silver lining. As in the 2010 cycle, all the chambers shifted in one direction in 2014, from D to R. Republicans won control in 11 chambers; two short of the average. Not only did Democrats not gain in chambers in 2014, they lost seats in the vast majority of chambers where seats were up. Democrats managed to add seats to their column in only 13 chambers. Republicans boosted their ranks by at least one seat in 64 chambers. Republicans saw their largest gains in the 400-member New Hampshire House, a chamber that has become very competitive over the past few elections, with a majority control shift in four of the past five elections. Republicans flipped more than 60 seats to win back the Granite State House of Representatives after losing it in 2012. Republicans seized both chambers in West Virginia, giving them control of the state s legislature for the first time since the 1920s. On Election Day, Republicans won a whopping 20 additional seats in the House, giving them a comfortable majority of 64 to 36. They tied the senate at 17 seats each. On the day after the election, a Democratic senator Figure B: Percent of Legislative Seats Held by Party, 1900 2015 70 60 Democrat Republican 50 40 30 20 10 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 The Council of State Governments 57

Figure C: 2015 State Partisan Control Republican (23) Democrat (7) Divided (19) Nonpartisan (1) changed party affiliation to the GOP, giving the party the senate majority for the first time since 1932. Nevada was another state where both chambers went from Democrat to Republican. In the Nevada Senate, Republicans needed to win only one seat to convert the 10 Republicans-11 Democrats minority to an 11 Republicans-10 Democrats majority, and they pulled it off. Nevada Assembly Democrats got swamped by the GOP tide and lost a dozen seats, giving the Republicans a comfortable 27-15 majority headed into 2015. New Mexico voters gave Republicans control of the House in the Land of Enchantment for the first time in 60 years. The post-election GOP majority was 37-33. The New Mexico Senate did not have any seats up for election in 2015. One of the two closest legislative chambers going into the election was the Colorado Senate, where Democrats held an 18-17 majority before ballots were cast. Republicans won enough of the very close senate seats, even though they also lost a couple, and flipped the chamber back to their column 18 Republicans and 17 Democrats after a decade in the minority. The Minnesota House switched for the third consecutive election. Republicans gained nine seats to earn a 72-62 majority. Like the Minnesota House, the Maine Senate has been one of the biggest legislative battlegrounds in recent years, having changed hands seven times since 1994. In 2014, Republicans seized control again after losing it two years ago. In the New York and Washington senates, Republicans had been in control since 2012 by virtue of coalitions with small groups of dissident Democrats, even though Republicans did not actually have the numerical majority of the seats. New York Republicans won back the majority advantage outright (33-30) in the Empire State, as did Washington Republicans (25-24). Gubernatorial Elections and Overall Control of States One of the most fascinating outcomes of the 2014 elections at the state level was that Republicans did not see a net gain in the total number of states completely run by the GOP. Headed into the 2014 election, there were 23 states where the legislature 58 The Book of the States 2015

and governor were both in the hands of Republicans. Democrats controlled 15 states and 11 were divided. As noted, Republicans had a net increase of 11 legislative chambers, but their gains in governor s races were less impressive. There were races for governor in 36 states in 2014. In six of those states, the party affiliation of the governor changed with Republicans winning back the governor s mansion from Democrats in Arkansas, Illinois, Maryland and Massachusetts. Democrats took back the governor s office in Pennsylvania; in Alaska, the governor went from being a Republican to an Independent. With all of those changes, the number of total GOP states legislature and governor stayed the same at 23; however, the number of states with Democrats running the show declined from 15 to seven. There are now 19 states with divided government eight more than before the election. Presidents and Legislative Elections In the four elections since 2008 with either Barack Obama on the ballot or in the White House, Democrats have suffered a net loss of 816 state legislative seats. President Obama is far from having the worst track record of the presidents who saw their party strength decline in legislatures since 1900. Presidents William Taft, Warren Harding, Herbert Hoover and Dwight Eisenhower all presided over larger, fourdigit losses in their party s legislative seat strength while running for and holding the highest office in the land. President Calvin Coolidge holds the record for boosting his party s fortunes as a candidate and then president. Under Coolidge, Republicans netted 260 seats. Ronald Reagan is a close second, having netted 250 seats. Now that President Obama has seen his last election as the Democratic Party s leader, it is interesting to consider how presidents parties have fared in legislatures during their tenure. Presidential coattails are an oft-cited factor in state elections. Factoring the Democrat s major losses in 2014 into Obama s tally, he joins the group of 14 presidents whose parties saw significant losses in legislative seats during their time at the top. Only five presidents actually gained legislative seats when heading up the ticket or being in the White House. They were Teddy Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman and Ronald Reagan. Table B: Legislative Seats Gained/Lost under Presidents since 1900 President Party Elections Net legislative seats gained/lost Theodore Roosevelt... Republican 1900, 1902, 1904, 1906 177 William Taft... Republican 1908, 1910-1,089 Woodrow Wilson... Democrat 1912, 1914, 1916, 1918-547 Warren Harding... Republican 1920, 1922-1,142 Calvin Coolidge... Republican 1924, 1926 260 Herbert Hoover... Republican 1928, 1930-1,058 Franklin Roosevelt... Democrat 1932, 1934, 1936, 1938, 1940, 1942, 1944 1,130 Harry Truman... Democrat 1946, 1948, 1950 85 Dwight Eisenhower... Republican 1952, 1954, 1956, 1958-1,035 John Kennedy... Democrat 1960, 1962-414 Lyndon Johnson... Democrat 1964, 1966-234 Richard Nixon... Republican 1968, 1970, 1972-180 Gerald Ford... Republican 1974-628 Jimmy Carter... Democrat 1976, 1978-379 Ronald Reagan... Republican 1980, 1982, 1984, 1986 250 George H.W. Bush... Republican 1988, 1990-21 Bill Clinton... Democrat 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998-612 George W. Bush... Republican 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006-108 Barack Obama... Democrat 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014-816 The Council of State Governments 59

Conclusion The 2014 elections saw the lowest voter turnout in decades in the United States. And many of the voters who did cast a ballot wanted to send President Obama a message that they disagreed with some of his signature policies. Republican legislative candidates almost uniformly attacked Obama s signature achievement, the Affordable Care Act. Republicans also reaped the benefits of a substantial advantage in redistricting following the 2010 census. That redistricting edge will continue until after the 2020 census. Democrats are working hard to devote more resources to state legislative elections in 2016 so they can reverse the redistricting advantage when line drawing happens again in 2021. Because 2016 is a presidential election year when turnout goes up dramatically, especially among the Democratic-friendly voting block, Democrats are optimistic that they can turn around their decline in legislatures and stop Republicans from eclipsing their all-time numbers of legislative seats. That peak happened in the 1920 election when Warren Harding won the White House, and over 4,350 of the nation s legislators were Republicans. Republicans will need to win about 200 more seats in 2016 to break the record. Democrats have their work cut out for them. About the Author Tim Storey is director of leaders services at the Denver, Colo.-based National Conference of State Legislatures. He specializes in elections and redistricting, as well as legislative organization and management. He staffed NCSL s Redistricting and Elections Committee for more than 20 years and has authored numerous articles on the topics of elections and redistricting. Every two years, he leads NCSL s StateVote project to track and analyze legislative election results. He graduated from Mars Hill College in North Carolina and received his master s degree from the University of Colorado s Graduate School of Public Affairs. 60 The Book of the States 2015