Disruptive Demographics: Implications for Workforce Planning and Development

Similar documents
People on the Move: Implications for Career Education

Disruptive Demographics: Implications for the Accounting Profession James H. Johnson, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Entrepreneurship & Strategy,

Disruptive Demographics: Implications for North Carolina s Health and Competitiveness

OVERVIEW. Demographic Trends. Challenges & Opportunities. Discussion

Disruptive Demographics and the Triple Whammy of Geographic Disadvantage

Six Disruptive Demographics That Will Change the U.S. & South Carolina Forever

Demographic Changes, Health Disparities, and Tuberculosis

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

Six Disruptive Demographics That Will Change the U.S. Forever

Disruptive Demographics and North Carolina s Global Competitiveness Challenge

Pulling Open the Sticky Door

Disruptive Demographics and the Triple Whammy of Geographic Disadvantage for America s Youth

Utah s Demographic Transformation

KENAN INSTITUTE WHITE PAPER

Changing Demographics & How They Affect Your Business, Today & Tomorrow

Population Outlook for the Portland-Vancouver Metropolitan Region

Application for Employment

The New U.S. Demographics

What Travel Trends Might Tell Us About the Future

Changing Demographics & How They Affect Your Business,

U.S. immigrant population continues to grow

Key Facts on Health and Health Care by Race and Ethnicity

THE NEW LATINO SOUTH: LATINOS IN NORTH CAROLINA. Understanding our Growing Community

Executive Director. Gender Analysis of San Francisco Commissions and Boards

By 1970 immigrants from the Americas, Africa, and Asia far outnumbered those from Europe. CANADIAN UNITED STATES CUBAN MEXICAN

Illegal Immigration: How Should We Deal With It?

Understanding the Immigrant Experience Lessons and themes for economic opportunity. Owen J. Furuseth and Laura Simmons UNC Charlotte Urban Institute

Regional Data Snapshot

Institute for Public Policy and Economic Analysis

Regional Data Snapshot

The foreign born are more geographically concentrated than the native population.

The EEO Tabulation: Measuring Diversity in the Workplace ACS Data Users Conference May 29, 2014

OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER. City Services Auditor 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Extrapolated Versus Actual Rates of Violent Crime, California and the United States, from a 1992 Vantage Point

the polling company, inc./ WomanTrend On behalf of the Center for Security Policy TOPLINE DATA Nationwide Survey among 1,000 Adults (18+)

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

The Youth Vote in 2008 By Emily Hoban Kirby and Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg 1 Updated August 17, 2009

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice. 400 County Center, 2 Floor Redwood City, CA

Our Shared Future: U N D E R S T A N D I N G B O S T O N. #SharedFuture. Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Political Landscape

Now is the time to pay attention

[MSBA REPORT & RECOMMENDATION ON DEMOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION]

The Impact of Immigrant Remodeling Trends on the Future of the Home Improvement Industry

CÉSAR M. MELGOZA / FOUNDER & CEO

We know that the Latinx community still faces many challenges, in particular the unresolved immigration status of so many in our community.

Oregon and STEM+ Migration and Educational Attainment by Degree Type among Young Oregonians. Oregon Office of Economic Analysis

Impact of Immigration: Disruptive or Helpful?

What Lies Ahead: Population, Household and Employment Forecasts to 2040 April Metropolitan Council Forecasts to 2040

Active Michigan Members by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Joining the Bar

More Than Just Language: A Look at Diversity Among Hispanic Boomers

Aberdeen. Knight Soul of the Community South Dakota. Why People Love Where They Live and Why It Matters: A Local Perspective

Mexicans in New York City, : A Visual Data Base

Prison Price Tag The High Cost of Wisconsin s Corrections Policies

Regional Data Snapshot

Disruptive Demographics: Implications for Higher Education Institutions

Preliminary Audit of the City s Diversity Report # June, 2016

CITY OF WILLIAMS EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

Le Sueur County Demographic & Economic Profile Prepared on 7/12/2018

CLACLS. A Profile of Latino Citizenship in the United States: Demographic, Educational and Economic Trends between 1990 and 2013

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CHIEF OF POLICE SURVEY 2018 SELECTION CRITERIA SURVEY RESULTS


WALTON COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER S OFFICE APPLICATION FOR AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

Evaluating the Role of Immigration in U.S. Population Projections

Home in America: Immigrants and Housing Demand

Interview dates: September 6 8, 2013 Number of interviews: 1,007

Needs and Challenges for. Race/Ethnicity Data

Final Report. Participation of Latino/Hispanic Population in the Food Stamp Program in the South.

With the notable exception of the migration of Oklahomans to California during the Dust Bowl years in

Application for Employment

Why disaggregate data on U.S. children by immigrant status? Some lessons from the diversitydatakids.org project

Name Home Phone( ) LAST FIRST MIDDLE Cell Phone( ) Address: Address NO STREET CITY STATE ZIP

The Older Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 2000 Issued September 2002

Spotlight on the 50+ AAPI Population

Overview of Boston s Population. Boston Redevelopment Authority Research Division Alvaro Lima, Director of Research September

California s Congressional District 37 Demographic Sketch

Habitat For Humanity of Greater Nashville APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

A Profile of Immigrants in Arkansas

Emerging and Established Hispanic Communities: Implications of Changing Hispanic Demographics

Demographic Change How the US is Coping with Aging, Immigration, and Other Challenges William H. Frey

NOVEMBER visioning survey results

BIG PICTURE: CHANGING POVERTY AND EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES IN SEATTLE

Asian Pacific American Heritage Month: May 2004

The New Segmentation: Do You Have a 1950 s Strategy in a 2015 World?

SMART GROWTH, IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Last Name First Name M.I. Name You Prefer. City State Zip Address. Daytime Phone Evening Phone Best Time to Call. City State If yes, where?

R 4.5% 28,228. New Americans in Fort Wayne and Northeast Indiana. Immigrant share of the population, 2016

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

Public and Subsidized Housing as a Platform for Becoming a United States Citizen

OREGON OUTLOOK Sponsored by Population Research Center Portland Multnomah Progress Board Oregon Progress Board

Racial Disparities in the Direct Care Workforce: Spotlight on Hispanic/Latino Workers

Peruvians in the United States

HubSpot 2019 Diversity Report

Immigrants are playing an increasingly

Labor Force Characteristics by Race and Ethnicity, 2015

Business Case for Diversity

The Great Immigration Turnaround

What are the major changes you are seeing in your community?

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

Transcription:

Disruptive Demographics: Implications for Workforce Planning and Development James H. Johnson, Jr. Ph.D. William Rand Kenan, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Entrepreneurship and Strategy Kenan-Flagler Business School Director, Urban Investment Strategies Center Frank Hawkins Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill November 2009 1

Overview Disruptive Demographics Impending Demographic Challenges Implications for Workforce Planning & Development November 2009 2

Disruptive Demographics Browning of America Greying of America Nexus of diversity issues undergirding these two demographic shifts November 2009 3

Core Values Family Personal and Lifestyle Characteristics by Veterans (1922-1945) Respect for authority Conformers Discipline Traditional Nuclear Generation Baby Boomers (1946-1964) Optimism Involvement Generation X (1965-1980) Skepticism Fun Informality Generation Y (1981-2000) Realism Confidence Extreme fun Social Disintegrating Latch-key kids Merged families Education A dream A birthright A way to get there An incredible expense Communication media Dealing with Money Rotary phones One-on-one Write a memo Put it away Pay cash Touch-tone phones Call me anytime Buy now, pay later Cell phones Call me only at work Cautious Conservative Save, save, save Internet Picture phones E-mail Earn to spend November 2009 4 Source: FDU Magazine Online Winter/Spring 2005

Workplace Characteristics Work Ethic and Values Veterans (1922-1945) Hard work Respect Authority Sacrifice Duty before fun Adhere to rules Baby Boomers (1946-1964) Workaholics Work efficiently Crusading causes Personal fulfillment Desire quality Question authority Work is.. An obligation An exciting adventure Leadership Style Directive Command-andcontrol Consensual Collegial Interactive Style Individual Team Player Loves to have meetings Generation X (1965-1980) Eliminate the task Self-reliance Want structure and direction Skeptical A difficult challenge A contract Everyone is the same Challenging others Ask why Entrepreneur Generation Y (1981-2000) What s next Multitasking Tenacity Entrepreneurial Tolerant Goal Oriented A means to an end Fulfillment *TBD Participative *As this group has not spent much time in the workforce, this characteristic has yet to be determined. November 2009 5 Source: FDU Magazine Online Winter/Spring 2005

Workplace Characteristics (cont d) Veterans (1922-1945) Baby Boomers (1946-1964) Generation X (1965-1980) Generation Y (1981-2000) Communications Formal Memo In person Direct Immediate Email Voice mail Feedback and Rewards No news is good news Satisfaction in a job well done Don t appreciate it Money Title recognition Sorry to interrupt but how am I doing? Freedom is the best reward Whenever I want it, at the push of a button Meaningful work Messages That Motivate Your experience is respected You are valued You are needed Do it your way Forget the rules You will work with other bright, creative people Work and Family Life Ne er the twain shall meet No balance Work to live Balance Balance November 2009 6 Source: FDU Magazine Online Winter/Spring 2005

People on the Move November 2009 7

November 2009 8

The Numbers Legal Immigrants: 1920-1961: 206,000 annually 1961-1992: 561,000 annually 1993-1998: 800,654 annually 1999-2004: 879,400 annually Refugees, Parolees, Asylees 1961-1993: 2.1 million (65,000 annually) 1994-1998: 428,361 (85,672 annually) 1999-2004: 487,386 (81,231 annually) Illegal Immigrants: 300,000 to 400,000 annually over the past two decades Three million granted amnesty in 1986 2.7 million illegal immigrants remained in U.S. after 1986 reforms October 1996: INS estimated that there were 5 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. August 2005: Illegal population range from 7 to 15 million. November 2009 9

Non-Immigrants Admitted to Year United States, Selected Years, 1981-2004 All Classes Exchange Visitors Academic & Vocational Students 1981 11,756,903 108,023 (1%) 271,861 (2%) 1985 9,539,880 141,213 (1%) 285,496 (3%) 1990 17,574,055 214,644 (1%) 355,207 (2%) 1995 22,640,540 241,364 (1%) 395,480 (2%) 2000 33,690,082 351,743 (1%) 699,953 (2%) 2001 32,824,088 389,435 (1%) 741,921 (2%) 2002 27,907,139 370,176 (1%) 687,506 (2%) 2004 30,781,330 360,777(1%) 656,373(2%) November 2009 Source: Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. 2004. 10

November 2009 11

Number of Immigrants (in millions) Immigration Population, 1900-2007 40 35 31.1 33.1 34.2 35.2 35.7 37.3 30 25 20 19.8 15 10 10.3 13.5 13.9 14.2 11.6 10.3 9.7 9.6 14.1 5 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year November 2009 Source: Center for Immigration Studies; U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey 12

Year World Region of Birth for U.S. Population, 1970-2004 1970 9,619,302 1980 14,709,906 1990 19,767,316 2000 28,379,000 2004 34,244,000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Europe Asia Latin America Other Areas November 2009 Source: Historical Census Statistics on the Foreign-Born Population of the United States: 1850-1990; Current Population Survey 13

Population Estimations by Race/Ethnicity, 1988-2050 Group Percent Change All Races 50% Whites 29% Blacks 94% Native Americans 109% Hispanics 238% Asians/Pacific Islanders 412% November 2009 14

U.S. Fertility Rate by Race/Ethnicity, 2006 Race/Ethnicity Number of Children Avg. U.S. Women 1.9 Asian Women 1.7 White, Non-Hispanic 1.8 Black 2.0 Hispanic 2.3 November 2009 Source: Dye (2008) available at www.census.gov/-prod/2008 pubs/p20-588.,pdf 15

America s Color Adjustment Race/Ethnicity 1995 2050 White 73.6 52.8 Blacks 12.0 13.5 Hispanics 10.2 24.5 Asian 3.3 8.2 American Indian 0.7 0.9 November 2009 16

Relative Distribution of U.S. Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2005 and 2050* Race/Ethnicity 2005 2050 White 67% 47% Blacks 12.8% 13% Hispanics 14% 29% Asian 5% 9% November 2009 Source: Pew Research Center, 2008 *projected. 17

Women Who Had a Birth in the Last 12 Months, 15-50 years old, by Select Characteristics, 2006 Characteristic Births per 1,000 Women All U.S. Women 55 Nativity Native Born 52 Foreign Born 71 November 2009 Source: Dye (2008) available at www.census.gov/-prod/2008 pubs/p20-588.,pdf 18

Women Who Had a Birth in the Last 12 Months, 15-50 years old, by Select Characteristics, 2006 (cont d) Characteristic Births per 1,000 Women All U.S. Women 55 Race White, non-hispanic 50 Black 58 American Indian/Alaska Native 68 Asian 54 Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 61 Some other Race 78 Two or More Races 58 November 2009 Source: Dye (2008) available at www.census.gov/-prod/2008 pubs/p20-588.,pdf 19

Women Who Had a Birth in the Last 12 Months, 15-50 years old, by Select Characteristics, 2006 (cont d) Characteristic Births per 1,000 Women All U.S. Women 55 Hispanic Origin Hispanic (any race) 74 Non-Hispanic 51 November 2009 Source: Dye (2008) available at www.census.gov/-prod/2008 pubs/p20-588.,pdf 20

Women Who Had a Birth in the Last 12 Months, 15-50 years old, by Select Characteristics, 2006 (cont d) Characteristic Births per 1,000 Women All U.S. Women 55 Citizenship Naturalized Citizen 49 Not a Citizen 83 November 2009 Source: Dye (2008) available at www.census.gov/-prod/2008 pubs/p20-588.,pdf 21

Median Age by Race and Gender, 2006 Race/Ethnicity Both Male Female U.S. 36.4 35.2 37.8 White Alone 39.0 37.6 40.4 White, Not Hispanic 40.6 39.3 41.9 Black Alone 31.4 29.3 33.3 Hispanic/Latino 27.3 27.0 27.6 Asian Alone 35.2 34.3 36.0 American Indian/Alaska Native 31.2 30.1 32.3 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 29.9 28.4 31.5 Some Other Race 27.4 27.3 27.5 Two or More Races 18.8 18.3 19.4 November 2009 22

Year Completed Fertility for Women 40-44 Years Old Percent Childless Avg. Number of Children Percent Higher Order Births* 2006 20 1.9 28 1976 10 3.1 59 *Three or more Children November 2009 Source: Dye (2008) available at www.census.gov/-prod/2008 pubs/p20-588.,pdf 23

U.S. Total and Foreign Born Population Change, 1990-2000 2000 Population Absolute Change 1990-2000 % Change 1990-2000 Total 281,243,499 33,323,643 13.4% Foreign Born 32,989,429 11,472,676 53.3% Hispanic (Foreign Born) Hispanic (Native Born) 14,410,703 6,331,264 78.4% 20,760,734 7,057,303 51.5% November 2009 Source: Public Use Microdata Samples, 1990 and 2000 (5% samples) 24

Year Change in Regional Distribution of Foreign Born Population, 1970-2004 1970 9,619,302 1980 14,709,906 1990 19,767,316 2000 28,379,000 2004 34,244,000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent West South Midwest Northeast Source: Historical Census Statistics on the Foreign-Born Population of the United States: 1850-1990; Current Population Survey November 2009 25

Percent Change in Total and Foreign Born Population, by Region, 1990-2000 70% 160% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Northeast 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Midwest 0% Total Foreign born Hispanics (Foreign born) Hispanics (Native born) 0% Total Foreign born Hispanics (Foreign born) Hispanics (Native born) 120% 70% 100% 60% 80% 60% 40% 20% South 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% West 0% Total Foreign born Hispanics (Foreign born) Hispanics (Native born) 0% Total Foreign born Hispanics (Foreign born) Hispanics (Native born) November 2009 26

November 2009 27

November 2009 28

November 2009 29

November 2009 30

November 2009 31

November 2009 32

States with Fastest Growing Immigrant Populations, 1990-2000 274% 233% 202% 196% 171% 169% 165% 160% 136% 135% States US Avg 57% NC (1) GA (2) NV (3) AR (4) UT (5) TN (6) NE (7) CO (8) AZ (9) KY (10) November 2009 Source: 1990, 2000 U.S. Census 33

States with Fastest Growing Immigrant Populations, 2000-2005 47% 40% 40% 38% 38% 37% 34% 31% 30% 30% States US Avg. 15% SC (1) TN (2) DE (3) GA (4) AL (5) AR (6) NH (7) NV (8) NC (9) IN (10) November 2009 Source: 2000 U.S. Census, 2005 American Community Survey 34

48% 46% 45% 45% 43% 43% States with Fastest Growing Hispanic Populations, 2000-2005 40% 39% 36% 36% States US Avg 19% AR (1) SC (2) GA (3) TN (4) NV (5) NC (6) NH (7) MD (8) AL (9) SD (10) November 2009 Source: 2000 U.S. Census 35

Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Economic Impact of Hispanics in North Carolina Industry Competitiveness Economic Output Labor-cost savings Taxes Income & Property Taxes Direct Consumption Taxes Indirect Taxes Overall Economic Impact Costs K-12 Education Health Service Delivery Corrections Consumer Spending Direct Effects Taxes Indirect Effects Spin-off Employment Taxes November 2009 36

Summary of Hispanic Economic Impact, North Carolina, 2006 Consumer Expenditures and Tax Contributors Total Per-Capita $9.2b $15,130 Cost of Essential Services $817m $1,360 Net Benefit $8.3b $13,770 Benefit-Cost Ratio $11-$1 November 2009 37

Blacks Return to the South Change in Population, 1990-2000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0-100,000-200,000-300,000-400,000 579,491-42,798-149,674-387,019 Northeast Midwest South West November 2009 38

Region Net Population Change Attributable to Non-White Population Growth, 1990-2000 2000 Population Net Change 1990-2000 % of Net Change Due to Nonwhite Population Growth United States 281,421,906 32,712,033 65% Northeast 53,594,378 2,785,149 100% Midwest 64,392,776 4,724,144 62% South 100,236,820 14,790,890 52% West 63,197,932 10,411,850 69% November 2009 39 Source: 1990 U.S. Census; 2000 U.S. Census.

November 2009 40

Region Net Population Change Attributable to Non-White Population Growth, 2000-2004 2004 Population Net Change 2000-2004 % of Net Change Due to Nonwhite Population Growth United States 293,655,404 12,233,498 81.5% Northeast 54,571,147 976,769 100.0% Midwest 65,729,852 1,337,076 82.5% South 105,944,965 5,708,145 74.4% West 67,409,440 4,211,508 81.0% November 2009 41 Source: 2000 U.S. Census; 2004 American Community Survey.

In-Migration, Out-Migration, Net Migration, and Movers from Abroad for Regions, 1990-2000 Region In Out Net Internal Migration Movers From Abroad Net Migration (including from abroad) Northeast 3,666 6,178-2,512 2,222-290 Midwest 6,978 6,909 69 1,641 1,711 South 11,761 9,357 2,404 4,185 6,588 West 6,751 6,731 38 4,185 4,222 (data in thousands) November 2009 42 Source: www.census.gov/population/socdemo/migration/tab-a-2.txt

Absolute and Relative Population Change for the U.S. and Census Regions, 1990-2000 Region 2000 Population Absolute Change 1990-2000 Relative Change 1990-2000 United States 281,421,906 32,712,033 13.2% Northeast 53,594,378 2,785,149 5.5% Midwest 64,392,776 4,724,144 7.9% South 100,236,820 14,790,890 17.3% West 63,197,932 10,411,850 19.7% November 2009 43 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau

Population by Race and Hispanic Origin for the United States: 2000 RACE & HISPANIC OR LATINO NUMBER % OF TOTAL Total Population 281,421,906 100.0% One Race 274,595,678 97.6% White 211,460,626 75.1% Black or African American 34,658,190 12.3% American Indian & Alaskan Native 2,475,986 0.9% Asian 10,242,998 3.6% Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander 398,835 0.1% Some other Race 15,359,073 5.5% Two or More Races 6,826,228 2.4% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 35,305,818 12.5% November 2009 44 Source: U.S. Census Bureau of the Census, Census 2000.

Net Population Change in the United States by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, 1990-2000 Race and Hispanic or Latino 2000 Population Net Gain 1990-2000 Percent Change Total 281,421,906 32,712,033 13.2% White 211,460,626 11,774,556 5.9% Black or African American 34,658,190 4,672,130 15.6% American Indian or Alaska Native 2,475,956 2,475,956 131.8% Asian 10,242,998 3,334,360 48.3% Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander 398,835 33,811 9.3% Some Other Race 15,359,073 5,554,226 56.6% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 35,305,818 12,951,759 57.9% November 2009 45 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, American Fact Finder.

Net Population Change in the United States by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, 2000-2005 Race and Hispanic or Latino 2005 Population Net Gain 2000-2005 Percent Change Total 292,261,463 10,839,557 3.9% White 218,236,353 6,775,727 3.2% Black or African American 35,301,449 643,259 1.9% American Indian or Alaska Native 2,351,386-124,570-5.0% Asian 12,501,514 2,258,516 22.0% Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander 387,691-11,144-2.8% Some Other Race 17,732,254 2,373,181 15.5% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 45,733,818 10,428,000 29.5% November 2009 46 Source: 2005 American Community Survey, PUMS Estimates; 2000 US Census.

1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Aging America: U.S. Median Age, 1820-2000 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 November 2009 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, San Francisco Chronicle 47

U.S. Population Turning 50, 55, 62, and 65 Years of Age, 2007-2015 Age 50 Age 55 Age 62 Age 65 Average Number / Day 12,344 11,541 9,221 8,032 Average Number / Minute 8.6 8.0 6.4 5.6 November 2009 48

Absolute and Relative Change in the Gender/Age Composition of the U.S. Population, 1990-2000 Gender/Age 2000 Population Net Change 1990-2000 % Change 1990-2000 Total 281,421,906 32,712,033 13.2% Male 138,053,563 16,814,145 13.9% Female 143,368,343 15,897,888 12.5% Age 18-34 67,035,178-2,878,520-4.1% Age 35-54 82,826,479 20,024,490 31.9% Age 55-64 24,274,684 3,126,761 14.8% Age 65+ 34,991,753 3,749,922 12.0% November 2009 49 Source: U.S. Bureau of Census (2000)

Absolute and Relative Change in the Gender/Age Composition of the U.S. Population, 2000-2005 Gender/Age 2005 Population Net Change 2000-2005 % Change 2000-2005 Total 292,261,463 10,839,557 3.9% Male 143,203,258 5,149,695 3.7% Female 149,058,205 5,689,862 4.0% Age 18-34 65,962,739-1,072,439-1.6% Age 35-54 86,399,619 3,573,140 4.3% Age 55-64 30,528,710 6,254,026 25.8% Age 65+ 35,199,481 207,728 0.6% November 2009 50 Source: 2000 U.S. Census; 2005 American Community Survey, PUMS Estimates

Age Profile of UNC-CH Faculty, 2002 Employee Type Number < 40 40-59 60+ Average Age Tenured/Tenure Track 1,821 310 1,213 298 50.4 (%) (100) (17) (67) (16) Fixed Term 870 254 570 46 45.5 (%) (100) (29) (66) (5) Total 2,691 564 1,783 344 48.8 (%) (100) (21) (66) (13) November 2009 Source: Institutional Research - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 51

Aging America: U.S. Population 65 and older, selected years, 1996-2030 (in millions) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1996 1999 2010 2020 2030 November 2009 52

Absolute and Percent Change in U.S. Population by Age, 2005-2050* Age 2005 2050 % Change Total 296 438 50.0% Age 0-17 73 102 39.7% Age 18-64 186 255 37.1% Age 65+ 37 81 118.9% November 2009 53 Source: Pew Research Center, 2008 *projected.

Older Workers in U.S. Workforces 65 or Older 75 or Older 2008 16.8% 7.3% 1998 11.9% 4.7% November 2009 54

Change in Foreign Born and Hispanic Shares of Working Age Population (18-64), 2005-2050 Age 2005 2050* Total 186 million 255 million Hispanic Share 14% 31% Foreign-born Share 15% 23% November 2009 Source: Pew Research Center, 2008 *projected. 55

Impending Demographic Challenges November 2009 56

November 2009 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division (2005) 57

Population of U.S. children under 18 years by race/ethnicity, income, and other social characteristics, 2004 All Children under 18 Families w/ low income($30,000/yr) Householders or Parents w/ no college experience Householders or Parents w/ no college experience and low income All White Non-white Hispanic 72,879,035 42,845,704 16,142,067 13,891,264 29.1% 19.5% 43.1% 42.6% 47.7% 41.6% 46.4% 68.2% 18.8% 10.6% 25.9% 35.7% November 2009 Source: American Community Survey (2004). 58

Population of U.S. children under 18 years by race/ethnicity, income, and other social characteristics, 2004 All Children under 18 Non-Homeowner Families Foreign-born Head of Household w/ no college experience All White Non-white Hispanic 72,879,035 42,845,704 16,142,067 13,891,264 33.2% 15.9% 50.8% 66.2% 12.9% 2.8% 10.4% 46.9% November 2009 Source: American Community Survey (2004). 59

Implications and Challenges Managing transition from the graying to the browning of America. Competition for talent will be fierce and global. Successful recruitment and retention will hinge on your ability to effectively manage the full nexus of diversity issues. November 2009 60

Responding to the Challenges Higher education must better prepare K-12 education leaders. Develop an education curriculum to better prepare our children for 21 st -century realities Provide the requisite mentoring and academic supports to maximize academic success Develop more effective strategies to recruit and retain qualified teachers. November 2009 61

What Our Youth Must Do Learn to code-switch Display entrepreneurial acumen Development contextual intelligence Embrace diversity November 2009 62