Revision to SEMI C , with title change to Specifications for Hydrogen Peroxide

Transcription

1 Procedural Review Voting Sheet 2010 Cycle 3 REGION: North America COMMITTEE: Liquid Chemicals EVENT: SEMICON West 2010 DATE OF MEETING: 2010/07/13 PLACE OF MEETING: San Francisco, CA COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS: Frank Flowers/FMC, Frank Parker/ICL SEMI STAFF: Ian McLeod Voter: Name/Company Date: 200/MM/DD I. Document Number & Title Document 4546B II. Tally (Staff to fill in) Revision to SEMI C , with title change to Specifications for Hydrogen Peroxide Voting Tally: As-cast tally after close of voting period A minimum of 60% of the voting interests that have voting members within the technical committee must return votes. (Regulations 9.6.1) Return Distribution Return Rate Yellow = 60.4% >=60% Lilac & Others Total Vote 34 Reject 1 Accept 16 NOTE FROM SEMI STAFF: Since the ballot had >90% accepts at the close of balloting, significance findings were not addressed, as they would have no bearing on the outcome of the review of this ballot. Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

2 III. Rejects Reject 1 (Safety Guru, LLC: Eric Sklar) 1 of Reject 1 (SG 1) Referenced *TF/Committee to fill in if necessary Section TItle *Original negative comment and justification should be included. Related Persuasive Withdrawal Motion by/2nd by Result of Vote (check ONE) : Change "Specifications" to "Specification" /Justification: Align with document types defined by the Regulations. No withdrawal made GO TO Related section Withdrawal document received by staff on (A) Related is mutually agreed upon. *This motion can be appended to the motion for Persuasive (See Persuasive Section) is related (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is not related (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) is related and persuasive (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is related and not persuasive (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) The issue raised is grammatical (specification vs specifications) rather than technical; the committee believes the correct document type is shown in the title. Frank Flowers (FMC) / Marty Burkhart (Hi Pure Tech) 7-0 [ is related and persuasive] > 1/3 [ is related and not persuasive] < 2/3 2/3=<[ is related and not persuasive] <90% 90% =< [ is related and not persuasive] is: (A) withdrawn (counted under h in disposition) (B) not related (counted under i in disposition) Final (C) related and not persuasive (significant) (D) not significant (counted under j in disposition) (E) related and persuasive DOCUMENT FAILS Comment generated. See comment #x (E) (C) GO TO Not Significant Finding Option Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

3 2 of Reject 1 (SG 2) Referenced *TF/Committee to fill in if necessary Section 7.1, Table 3 *Original negative comment and justification should be included. Related Persuasive Withdrawal Motion by/2nd by Result of Vote (check ONE) : Move the table of requirements to immediately following the first reference to it. the order in which they occur. /Justification: Tables and Figures should immediately follow the first references to them in the text. Renumber the tables in No withdrawal made GO TO Related section Withdrawal document received by staff on (A) Related is mutually agreed upon. *This motion can be appended to the motion for Persuasive (See Persuasive Section) is related (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is not related (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) is related and persuasive (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is related and not persuasive (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) The committee believes the current location of the table is appropriate. Also, Ian McLeod (SEMI) noted that the current Style Manual neither requires nor guarantees a particular location of tables in SEMI Standards and Safety Guidelines. Frank Parker (ICL Performance Products) / Jean Marie Collard (Solvay) 7-1 [ is related and persuasive] > 1/3 [ is related and not persuasive] < 2/3 2/3=<[ is related and not persuasive] <90% 90% =< [ is related and not persuasive] is: (A) withdrawn (counted under h in disposition) (B) not related (counted under i in disposition) Final (C) related and not persuasive (significant) (D) not significant (counted under j in disposition) (E) related and persuasive DOCUMENT FAILS Comment generated. See comment #x (E) (C) GO TO Not Significant Finding Option Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

4 3 of Reject 1 (SG 3) NOTE FROM SEMI STAFF: The editorial change shown later in this file was approved prior to adjudication of this negative. Referenced *TF/Committee to fill in if necessary Related Section Notice in 2, Note 2 (after ) *Original negative comment and justification should be included. : Replace this Notice with one stating that the document does not address all of the safety issues or delete the Note /Justification: The two are mutually exclusive. GO TO Related Withdrawal Motion by/2nd by Result of Vote (check ONE) No withdrawal made Withdrawal document received by staff on section (A) Related is mutually agreed upon. *This motion can be appended to the motion for Persuasive (See Persuasive Section) is related (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is not related (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) The issue addressed no longer exists, as it has already been fixed by editorial change. Frank Flowers (FMC) / Vincent Terracina (Solvay) 8-0 [ is related] > 1/3 [ is not related] < 2/3 GO TO Persuasive 2/3=< [ is not related] (B) is: (A) withdrawn (counted under h in disposition) (B) not related (counted under i in disposition) Final (C) related and not persuasive (significant) (D) not significant (counted under j in disposition) (E) related and persuasive DOCUMENT FAILS Comment generated. See comment #x Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

5 4 of Reject 1 (SG 4) Referenced *TF/Committee to fill in if necessary Section Equation in 8.1 *Original negative comment and justification should be included. Related Persuasive : Replace the equation with: Volume of KMnO4 ( ml) Normality of KMnO Mass of sample ( g) 4 % Assay /Justification: "ml" is a unit of measure, not a quantity "Mass" is the quantity of a substance; "weight" is the force of local gravity on that mass. Weight depends on mass and location. "g" is a unit of mass; it is not a unit of force. Withdrawal No withdrawal made GO TO Related section Withdrawal document received by staff on (A) Related is mutually agreed upon. *This motion can be appended to the motion for Persuasive (See Persuasive Section) is related (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is not related (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) is related and persuasive (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is related and not persuasive (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) The technical personnel using the equation understand it using the terminology as currently expressed in the standard. Motion by/2nd by Frank Flowers (FMC) / Jean-Marie Collard (Solvay) 5-1 [ is related and persuasive] > 1/3 [ is related and not persuasive] < 2/3 (E) Result of Vote (check ONE) 2/3=<[ is related and not persuasive] <90% (C) GO TO Not 90% =< [ is related and not persuasive] Significant Finding Option is: (A) withdrawn (counted under h in disposition) (B) not related (counted under i in disposition) Final (C) related and not persuasive (significant) (D) not significant (counted under j in disposition) (E) related and persuasive DOCUMENT FAILS Comment generated. See comment #x Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

6 5 of Reject 1 (SG 5) Referenced *TF/Committee to fill in if necessary Section *Original negative comment and justification should be included. Related Persuasive Withdrawal Motion by/2nd by Result of Vote (check ONE) Change "is demonstrated" to "has been demonstrated". /Justification: The validity must be established before the method is used. No withdrawal made GO TO Related section Withdrawal document received by staff on (A) Related is mutually agreed upon. *This motion can be appended to the motion for Persuasive (See Persuasive Section) is related (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is not related (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) is related and persuasive (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) is related and not persuasive (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) The committee believes the existing language is grammatically correct. Frank Flowers (FMC) / Marty Burkhart (Hi Pure Tech) 5-1 [ is related and persuasive] > 1/3 [ is related and not persuasive] < 2/3 2/3=<[ is related and not persuasive] <90% 90% =< [ is related and not persuasive] is: (A) withdrawn (counted under h in disposition) (B) not related (counted under i in disposition) Final (C) related and not persuasive (significant) (D) not significant (counted under j in disposition) (E) related and persuasive DOCUMENT FAILS Comment generated. See comment #x (E) (C) GO TO Not Significant Finding Option Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

7 Disposition of Reject 1 5 Original number of s (g) 0 # of s withdrawn (h) 1 # of s found not related (i) 0 # of s found not significant (j) Final g-(h+i+j)=0 g-(h+i+j)>0 Reject is Not Valid and is not included in the denominator of VI. Approval Conditions Check Reject is included in the denominator of VI. Approval Conditions Check Reject without a Not Valid Note: If all of the negative material included with a reject vote is withdrawn, determined to be not related, or determined to be not significant, the reject vote is not valid. (Regulations ) IV. Comments Comment 1 Comment Action proposed Referenced Section From Comment : Note 2 Jean-Marie Collard (Solvay) I don t see a Note 1 above this in the document, so this should probably be Note 1 instead of Note 2. The committee agreed to do one of the following actions. *No motion is required in this step. No further action was taken by the committee. Refer to the task force for more consideration. New Business Other: Ask Pubs to fix the note numbering during publication Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

8 V. Summary of Editorial Changes Note: Original section number and at least one full sentence are required in FROM and TO fields. FROM: NOTICE following Section 2 NOTICE: This standard does not purport to address safety issues, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the users of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory or other limitations prior to use. 1 TO: NOTICE following Section 2 NOTICE: This safety guideline does not purport to address all of the safety issues associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the users of this safety guideline to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory or other limitations prior to use. Justification: (If necessary) NOTICEs are not part of the technical content of the standard, by definition. Motion To approve the above editorial changes Motion Frank Flowers (FMC)/Suhas Ketkar (Air Products and Chemicals) by/2nd by Vote 8-0 Motion passed VI. Approval Conditions Check APPROVAL CONDITION 1: All negatives have been discussed and were withdrawn, found not related, or not persuasive. (Regulations 9.6.2) APPROVAL CONDITION 2: At least 90% of the sum of the valid accept and reject votes must be accept. (Regulations 9.6.3) Note: if both approval conditions are not satisfied, the document fails. Accepts (Accepts + Valid Approval Rate = 16 / 17 = 94.1% >=90% Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

9 VII. Safety Check See 14 of the Regulations for further information Motion: This is not a Safety Document: when all safety-related information is removed, the document is still technically sound and complete. This is a Safety Document: when all safety-related information is removed, the document is not technically sound and complete. Safety Checklist (Regulations 14.3) is complete and has been included with the document throughout the balloting process. Motion by/2nd by Eric Sklar (Safety Guru, LLC) / Frank Flowers (FMC) Vote 8-0 Motion passed VIII. Intellectual Property Check Note: This ballot may be all or part of a Standard or Safety Guideline. This IP check applies to the entire Standard or Safety Guideline. See 15 of the Regulations for further information The meeting chair asked those present in person or by electronic link, if they were aware of any potentially material patented technology or copyrighted items* in the Standard or Guideline. No potentially material patented technology or copyrighted items are known Potentially material patented technology or copyrighted items are known but a Letter of Assurance (LOA) or copyright release for such material has been obtained or presented to the committee. GO TO SECTION I GO TO SECTION I Potentially material patented technology or copyrighted items are known but an LOA or copyright release for some of the material(s) has NOT been obtained or presented to the committee * Note: Such potentially material patented technology or copyrighted items might have become known since the Standard or Safety Guideline was last reviewed, or might become relevant due to this ballot. Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7

10 I. Action for this document Motion This document passed committee review as balloted and will be forwarded to the for procedural review. This document passed committee review with editorial changes and will be forwarded to the for procedural review. This document failed committee review and will be returned to the task force for rework. This document failed committee review and work will be discontinued. Motion by/2nd Frank Flowers (FMC) / Jean-Marie Collard (Solvay) by Vote 8-0 Motion passed Final Action Motion failed Approved Ballot Report Template Revision 7.7