CITY OF AURORA OHIO Architectural Board of Review Meeting Minutes October 22, 2015

Transcription

1 CITY OF AURORA OHIO Architectural Board of Review Meeting Minutes October 22, 2015 The Architectural Board of Review met for a scheduled meeting on Thursday, October 22, 2015 in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Chairman David Riedel called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Nathan Barrett Lauren Broderick, Vice Chairman Crystal Lavy David Riedel, Chairman Derek Stetter Also Present: Meredith Davis, Asst. Director Planning, Zoning, Building Division Marie Lawrie, Clerk AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: To move Mike Bungo, 229 S Chillicothe Rd, Garage/Breezeway Addition to 3 rd item under New Business Ms. Lavy moved for approval; Mr. Barrett seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Lavy, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Riedel DECLARATION OF OATH: Mr. Riedel administered the oath to all those in attendance who wished to speak during the meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: To approve the minutes of the September 24, 2015 meeting Ms. Broderick moved for approval; Ms. Lavy seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Broderick, Ms. Lavy, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Riedel

2 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes To approve the minutes of the October 13, 2015 meeting Mr. Stetter moved for approval; Mr. Barrett seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Mr. Stetter, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Ms. Lavy, Mr. Riedel OLD BUSINESS: ARTISTIC DESIGN 268 BONNIE LANE VINYL CHIMNEY No one was present to represent this item. It will continue on next month s agenda as Old Business. Tabled DEBBIE SZCEPINSKI 620 SHERWOOD DR ADDITION Dan Keough, of Solon Valley Home Improvement along with Debbie Szcepinski the homeowner was in attendance to answer questions. The applicant was seeking approval to erect a 34 x 10 addition on the rear elevation of the home. This addition will update the home as well as create more living space. The current kitchen is 9 x 9. The exterior materials will match the existing house. There was a conversation pertaining to matching the existing white siding. No sample of the siding was available at the meeting. Ms. Lavy motioned, Mr. Stetter seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Lavy, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Mr. Riedel NEW BUSINESS: DONALD GARDI 537 PARKER RD DETACHED GARAGE Jon Keeney, of Lally Construction Inc, along with Donald Gardi, the homeowner was present to represent this project. This accessory structure was granted a variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals, for placement in the front yard, on October 14, The plans detailed a 22 x 30 side-loading, detached garage to match the residence. It was stated that the house has a brick to grade foundation. There was a conversation pertaining to the fact that the Architectural Guidelines call for brick to grade on this accessory structure. It was explained that the board can consider a hardship situation and deviate from the guidelines at their discretion. Ms. Broderick explained some reasons that could be considered a hardship. She did not feel that because the builder stated he was previously approved to erect other garages without brick to grade, that this constitutes a hardship. She cautioned the board to be consistent on this matter, as this builder is likely to return with future projects. There was a lengthy conversation about how brick can be added to this type of foundation. The builder was in favor of a

3 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes standard stem wall pour. The board considered that the garage will sit 800 feet from the street. There was a discussion initiated by Mr. Stetter about whether it is appropriate to deviate from the guidelines based on whether a structure can be seen from the street. Ms. Lavy motioned, Mr. Stetter seconded, and the motion carried, 3-2, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Lavy, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Riedel Nays: Ms. Broderick, Mr. Stetter MICHAEL BUNGO 229 S CHILLICOTHE RD GARAGE/BREEZEWAY ADDITION Jon Keeney, of Lally Construction Inc, along with the homeowner, Michael Bungo was present at the meeting. Mr. Bungo is seeking approval to replace his existing breezeway and one and a half car garage which is in need of repair. This is a landmarked property and received a certificate of appropriateness to demo the existing section and appropriately reconstruct a breezeway and a two-car garage. That meeting took place October 15, There was a discussion about the type of foundation that exists on the home. The builder explained his plan to match that home s foundation using parged, block foundation walls, waterproofed with ironite. There was a conversation pertaining to the use of Hardi cement board siding. Materials were noted on the plans. Mr. Barrett motioned, Ms. Broderick seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Ms. Lavy, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Riedel GREEN ACRES 4EVER LLC GREENVIEW DR DETACHED GARAGE Tom Reitz was in attendance to represent the property owner, who is his spouse. This project was granted a variance by the Board of Zoning Appeals on October 14, 2015 for placement of the garage. This project is meant to replace the existing garage which has a failing foundation. Mr. Reitz explained the history of the property and also the hardships he has faced with topography and standing water. He explained that the downspouts of the new structure will be directed to the frontage pipe. There was discussion pertaining to the orientation of the garage doors. Topography prevents a side-loading garage. The house has a block to grade foundation. Materials were noted on the plans. Mr. Barrett acknowledged the block to grade foundation and the front-facing garage as a pre-existing condition. There was discussion as to why the structure has three man doors on the rear elevation. It was explained that this is a duplex. The garage will be sub-divided into 3 sections on the interior. There will be one door for each of the tenants and a third door for the owner to store maintenance equipment.

4 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes Ms. Barrett motioned, Ms. Broderick seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Ms. Lavy, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Riedel KURT WINKLER 687 GLEN EDEN CT SUNROOM Kurt Winkler, property owner was present to answer questions. He was seeking approval to erect a 20 x 20 three-season room. The applicant stated that the project was approved by the Walden Homeowners Association. Mr. Stetter read aloud the Residential Guidelines as pertains to three season rooms. This room will be located on the second floor of the condo. Understanding that the addition should have the appearance of a solid foundation, the applicant was questioned about the intended use of the space underneath. Mr. Winkler intends to treat that space as a covered patio. Ms. Lavy, Ms. Broderick seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Lavy, Ms. Broderick, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Riedel WALDEN CO 433 EQUESTRA NORTH S/L 11 CONDO Ron Skok, of Walden Company was on hand to answer questions. He was seeking approval to erect a 3,900 square foot two-story condo within the Walden Subdivision. The fireplace located in the great room was discussed. Mr. Stetter read aloud the Residential Guidelines as they pertain to chimneys. It was discovered that the chimney was not drawn in on the plans. The board has requested that the applicant submit a revised drawing to the Building Department showing a brick clad chimney for the fireplace. This revision will need to be ed to the board members and approved before a building permit can be issued. Sky lights were discussed. Per the Residential Guidelines, skylights shall not be visible from the street or road on which the house/structure fronts. Due to the unique design of this development and previous approvals of skylights, the skylights will be approved as drawn. To approve the plans only after revised drawings are submitted to the Building Department and forwarded to Board Members showing the fireplace chimney location and building materials for final approval Mr. Stetter moved; Ms. Lavy seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Mr. Stetter, Ms. Lavy, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Mr. Riedel

5 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes DAN KEARNEY 1163 ORCHARD AVE ADDITION No one was present to represent this item. This project will appear as Old Business on the next agenda. THE COSMETIC COMPANY STORE 549 S CHILLICOTHE RD, #370 SIGN Yacine Djemil, of Sign Vision was in attendance. He was seeking approval for a square foot wall sign to be placed above the store entrance. The existing gooseneck lights will be reused. Building materials and colors were discussed and noted on the plans. Ms. Lavy moved; Mr. Stetter seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Lavy, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Mr. Riedel RICHARD SEIPLE 269 BONNIE LANE ARBOR/FENCE John Reminder, of Four Corners Home Improvement attended the meeting. He explained that they are rebuilding an arbor that was disassembled after Mr. Seiple had water issues on the property. The board questioned if the project needed to come before them. Materials were noted on the plans. Mr. Barrett moved; Mr. Stetter seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Mr. Barrett, Mr. Stetter, Ms. Broderick, Ms. Lavy, Mr. Riedel Future projects that consist of a reconstruction of a previously approved structure will not be added to the Architectural Board of Review agenda. HAROLD AND TAMI HOOD 1065 WINCHELL RD FRONT PORCH Harold Hood, property owner was available to answer questions. He was seeking approval to erect a 10 x 6 roofed front porch to an existing structure. The applicant has a New England Cottage Style renovation in mind for this home they has purchased for their retirement. He has future plans to replace the siding, replace the windows, and cover the existing brick with stone. Building materials and colors were discussed and noted on the plans. There was discussion about the hand railing on the

6 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes drawings of the front porch. It was stated that though they detract from the project, they may be required by the Ohio Building Codes due to the height of the front steps. Mr. Stetter moved; Ms. Broderick seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Mr. Stetter, Ms. Broderick, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Lavy, Mr. Riedel PAYNE & PAYNE 540 CLUB DR W SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Joel Hoar, project manager for Payne & Payne Builders, was on hand to represent the project. He was seeking approval to construct an 8,023 square foot, two-story residence within the Barrington subdivision. Revisions were brought in the day of the meeting. Mr. Hoar stated that the revision pertained to the walk-out basement, which was omitted due to the topography of the land. The plans were reportedly approved by the Barrington Architectural Board of Review. The copper above the windows on the front elevation were discussed and it was agreed that this was standard for the Barrington development. The chimneys shown on page A7 and A8 were discussed. No chimney was drawn on the elevations. A decision was made that one brick or stone chimney would be built to vent the fireplaces. The builder is to submit a revised roof plan, as well as updated rear and right elevations showing the chimney location and building materials for final approval before a building permit will be issued. The cement board siding on the front elevation was discussed. After a sample of the material was provided, it was agreed that it was a nice complement to the brick. Sample colors and materials were presented and noted on the plans. To approve the plans only after revised drawings are submitted to the Building Department and forwarded to Board Members showing the fireplace chimney location and building materials for final approval Ms. Lavy moved; Mr. Barrett seconded, and the motion carried, 4-0-1, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Lavy, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Mr. Riedel Abstentions: Mr. Stetter RYAN HOMES 479 DANBURY DR S/L 21 CONDO Phil Wendzicki and Jeremy Feehan, both of Ryan Homes were present at the meeting. They were seeking approval to erect a 3,909 square foot, single-story, Brentwood model condo within the Lakes of Aurora Subdivision. This will be the model home for this phase of the development. The stone wraps were discussed. Stone wrap on the front elevation will be water table height and return to the columns

7 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes of the front entrance. Stone wrap on the left side elevation needs to return at full height. This was drawn in on the building plans. Stone wrap on the garage side elevation will be extended to the garage door. This was also drawn in on the building plans. There will be no shutters and no bay windows on this condo. The egress window shown on page A-4 was included in error. Color schedule was noted on the plans. There was a discussion pertaining to the similarity comparison which resulted in clarifying that the board will view two units on either side of the proposed project, as well as the three structures across the street. There was a conversation initiated by Mr. Stetter pertaining to the practice of drawing adjustments to the building plans in accordance with the plan approval by the Architectural Board of Review. It was decided that the builders would be responsible to draw these changes on the stamped building plans at the meeting in order to finalize an approval. In some instances, the board will require a revised set of plans to be turned in to the Building Department and forwarded to Board Members via for final approval before a building permit will be issued. This will be at the discretion of the Architectural Board of Review. To approve the plans with the change that the stone wrap on the left side elevation, return at full height and the stone wrap on the right side elevation return to the garage door trim, and the elimination of the egress window on the basement floor plan Ms. Lavy moved; Mr. Stetter seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Lavy, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Mr. Riedel Michael Akins, Construction Cost Manager for Ryan Homes was in attendance. He addressed the property located at 781 Hilliary Lane, which was constructed with a partial metal roof. He apologized for any misunderstanding about this feature, which is against the Residential Guidelines. It was explained that this feature has been removed all together from the product line for this subdivision and will not be offered on any future condo. CLASSIC HOMES 835 E HOMESTEAD DR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Ed Wurm Jr., of Classic Homes was on hand representing the project. Presented to the Board for approval was a 4,380 square foot, two-story, single family residence within the Homestead subdivision. There was discussion pertaining to the standing seam metal roof sections on the front elevation. The cantilevered vent for the fireplace on the rear elevation was discussed. Finishes were presented and noted on the plans. This home passed the similarity comparison.

8 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes Mr. Stetter moved; Mr. Barrett seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Mr. Stetter, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Broderick, Ms. Lavy, Mr. Riedel MARY HERBERTH 884 EAST BLVD DETACHED GARAGE John D Amico of The Great Garage Company was in attendance to represent the project. Ms. Herberth was seeking approval to construct a 20 x 16 one-car accessory structure. She has owned the property for 30 years without a garage. The home has a block foundation and white vinyl siding. The contractor will match the house in color only. Painted Louisiana-Pacific Smart engineered wood siding will be used on the garage. The difference in the measurement of the lapping between the two structures and the finish of the corners was cause for discussion. Mr. Stetter read aloud the Residential Guidelines as pertained to this accessory structure which guided the board to request the accessory structure match the house in color. It did not address matching the building materials. The board asked Ms. Herberth for her comments on the building materials. She stated that the intended engineered wood siding is more economical and has a better appearance than the vinyl siding on the residence. Surrounding structures were reviewed as seen in the photographs provided in the packet. There were other structures in close proximity with similar width of lapping. Ms. Broderick asked the Board to consider the overall aesthetics of the neighborhood and the improvement value of the project, for this property. This parcel is non-conforming and a hardship exists pertaining to erecting a side-loading garage. This project will go before the Board of Zoning Appeals on November 11, 2015 seeking a variance for the placement of this structure. Ms. Broderick moved; Mr. Stetter seconded, and the motion carried, 4-1, on a roll call vote. Yeas: Ms. Broderick, Mr. Stetter, Mr. Barrett, Ms. Lavy Nays: Mr. Riedel MISCELLANEOUS: Hawkin Subdivision, E Mennonite Rd - Preliminary Alicia Verner, Estimator along with Jim O Connor, Land Manager both of Drees Homes gave a preview of the elevations that are planned for the Hawkin Subdivision. Mr. O Connor asked the Board members to consider the hardship they face as pertains to the restriction of frontloading garages in this development. The board was in agreement that this is a previously platted subdivision which will result in the majority of houses being erected with frontloading garages. The builder will construct units with side-loading garages where feasible. The Hawkin subdivision was granted a Conditional Zoning Certificate, for a residential

9 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes conservation development by Planning Commission on June 7, 2006 and approved by City Council on July 10, This approval remains with the property regardless of owner. A preliminary plan was approved by Planning Commission on December 20, The Board of Zoning Appeals approved two 20-foot side setback variances on February 14, The subdivision had been platted in fee simple lots. This development will be single family residences with lot lines. Homeowners will be responsible for their own property maintenance, including mowing the lawn and snow removal. Mr. O Connor explained that with the intent of the Residential Guidelines in mind and the reality of the hardship they face with the existing plat, they have made changes to the floorplans. They plan to erect houses with a prominent front porch which will be the primary visual element of these units. They are constructing similar products in Brunswick currently with success. Homeowners are said to be sitting on their front porches and socializing with their neighbors. They hope to introduce the same product being built in the Southlake Subdivision in Brunswick, here in Aurora. Members will be invited to the open house for that development to tour the units. Ms. Verner reported square footage between for the units. She described this development to be a blend between The Meadows of Aurora and Yorkshire Estates. This development will be marketed to a broad spectrum of buyers. Ms. Lavy stated that the acknowledgement pertaining to the front-loading garages does not include approval of the elevations presented as a whole. There was a brief discussion pertaining to the Alistair model and some details that Drees Homes might consider revising. Mr. O Connor was looking to present his concept, in an effort to move forward with the project at this meeting and will come back in front of the Board with the product at a later meeting. Ms. Verner stated that the similarity comparison used by Drees Homes and that of the Architectural Board of Review are the same. Ms. Verner assured the Board members that they will continue to follow the Residential Guidelines as pertains to venting fireplaces thru the rear elevation or a brick/stone chimney, brick to grade at the foundation, front elevation bay windows with the appearance of a solid foundation, etc. as they have followed to date. Aurora 43 South LLC, Dino Project, S Chillicothe Rd - Preliminary Keith Filipkowski, of Pulte Group was present to address the Board. He provided elevations and floorplans for the units they hope to erect in this new development. There will be a public hearing for this project at the November 18, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting. The public hearing will address the wetland variances that Pulte Group is seeking. The site was reported as approximately 25 acres on the west side of South Chillicothe Road. This subdivision received a conditional zoning certificate under the previous Residential Conservation Development guidelines in May, They plan to erect 57 units, 7 of which are projected to have side-loading garages under the previous RCD guidelines. The reason that the majority of the units will have front-loading garages is due to the topography of the land and the amount of wetlands present on the site. Ms. Davis reported that the developer will not fill in all of the wetlands area they have received permission to fill. The City is in favor of keeping wetlands in tack to function naturally. The developer and the City are working together on setbacks for the site as well as maintaining wetlands. The developer has reduced

10 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes the number of units they plan to build to allow enough space for families to have a backyard space and the possibility of erecting an accessory structure, such as a shed, which has been difficult for similar developments. When the Board discussed the dilemma they face to follow the Architectural Guidelines, which state that garage doors shall not face the street or right-of-way except for hardship reasons, Ms. Lavy reminded the members that this site was approved under the previous RCD guidelines, which allows clustering of units. This creates a hardship. The guidelines have changed for RCD and future developments should not face this hardship. Ms. Davis explained that the previous RCD guidelines allowed for clustering of homes in an effort to preserve green space; however this did not lend itself to erecting units with side-loading garages. Mr. Barrett questioned whether a separate set of guidelines would be helpful for RCD subdivisions. Ms. Broderick stated there have been several discussions about this topic over the years with past and present members to the conclusion that there are other areas of the guidelines that still apply. Side-loading garages are an area that becomes an issue. The Residential Guidelines have been amended to alleviate some of the challenges the Board has faced in the past. Ms. Broderick further stated that together, the City, the Board, Planning and Zoning, and the developer have worked to come to an understanding about how these pre-existing conditions, on these wetlands, can be utilized to be both the benefit of City and the developer. Future RCD subdivisions will be required to have a larger lot to alleviate this problem. For this project, with the majority of the units being constructed with front-loading garages, the Board acknowledges that this will be acceptable. The developer will erect sideloading garages where feasible. The Board requested that the developer offer to construct 2 separate garage doors on the front-loading garages as well as carriage-style doors, as an option. For this project, the Board will still consider all other aspects of the Residential Guidelines that are applicable, including similarity comparisons. Mr. Filipkowski asked the members to review the elevations provided and offer feedback. A discussion ensued about how the similarity comparison has changed since the last development Pulte Group has constructed in Aurora. Mr. Stetter read aloud from Chapter Issuance of Permits; Similarity of Buildings. Under the parameters of this chapter, the Board will be looking for the units to be different from each other architecturally and with regards to the color sequence. Under review will be the 2 units on either side of the subject home, as well as the 3 units across the street. Sub lot 57 on the proposed plat was discussed in detail pertaining to the direction the garage would face on this corner lot. Should the garage be erected side-loading, it would face the main road of the development. Although this would comply with the Residential Guidelines, it may not be ideal. Mr. Riedel stated that the builder should consider the Residential Guidelines and the intent behind them, and put in side-loading garages where feasible. The side-loading garage requirement and the stipulation that the garage doors will not face the street or right-of-way will not be strictly enforced for this particular development. When asked what the price point and intended market for this product will be, it was stated by the builder that this product would be marketed to families, first or second time buyers. An exact price was not disclosed, the cost will reflect what the market will bear.

11 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes Barrington Subdivision, Club Side Manor Section Preliminary Keith Filipkowski of Pulte Group also presented elevations for approximately 38 lots in Club Side Manor. He reported that they have attended 4-5 meetings to date with Barrington s Architectural Board of Review. That board requests that the same 12 pre-approved colors continue into this section for shake and horizontal siding due to maintenance. He does have approval to vary on the accent colors. Mr. Stetter acknowledged that the Barrington subdivision is constructed within those perimeters and the Aurora Architectural Board of Review would want him to continue with that theme. Mr. Filipkowski noted that there will be four ranch homes offered at a fifty-four foot wide product, with four elevations per plan. They have adjusted the roof pitch to blend in with the established structures. They will also offer a 3200 square foot, two-story, first floor master home. These will be single family, limited maintenance units. The exterior is maintained by the Homeowners Association and the inside is the responsibility of the homeowner. The elevations were discussed in detail. Some elevations were determined to be very similar. The false dormers were subject to discussion. It was reported that the floorplan does not extend out far enough to construct true, working dormers. Ms. Lavy offered feedback that dormers did not seem the correct proportion. Adjustments to the size of the dormers will be considered. Residential Guidelines were reviewed as pertains to the proposed elevations. Mr. Stetter read aloud the section pertaining to bay windows. Similarity Comparison was also reviewed including how to compare houses on a cul-de-sac. They might compare the two on either side more so than the three across the street depending on the size of the cul-de-sac. The direction the house faces will be considered. It was stated that the Barrington Architectural Board of Review also considers the two houses on either side and the three across from a subject house. Ms. Lavy reminded the builder that it goes back to the intent of the guidelines. The Board and builder agreed to take some time outside of the meeting to consider the site plan and let the builder know which sub lots will be considered for comparison on the cul-de-sacs for future reference. The Board reminded the builder that whether the homes to be considered for comparison are a Pulte home or an established residence, they will want to see pictures presented at the meetings. Mr. Stetter explained his stance that he does not feel it wise to draw-in the changes needed on building plans. Other cities simply require revised drawings. Ms. Lavy commented that the Board should be helpful and not hold up projects. It was suggested that some changes can be revised and ed to board members for final approval, while smaller changes can be drawn in by the builder at the meeting. They will be tabled until the end of the meeting while they revise their drawings. The builders who frequently need changes pertaining to window placement and additional shutters will be asked to make these notations on their plans before submitting them to the Building Department. Mr. Stetter firmly believes plans should be accurate, for everyone involved, including the inspector in the field.

12 City of Aurora Meeting Minutes The builder and homeowner of 268 Bonnie Lane will receive a letter notifying them to attend the next meeting. A final decision needs to be made on the vinyl chimney. ADJOURNMENT: Ms. Lavy moved; Mr. Stetter seconded, and the meeting adjourned at 11:43 p.m. on a unanimous voice vote. David Riedel, Chairman Marie Lawrie, Secretary