REPORT OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL DISTRICTS
|
|
- Beverley McBride
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REPORT OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL DISTRICTS TO THE ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL I. Introduction and Executive Summary The Committee on Electoral Districts (hereinafter "Committee") was established by the Anaheim City Council on April 7, 2015, pursuant to City Council Resolution No in response to the passage of Anaheim Measures L and M, which were approved by the voters in November Measure L establishes elections by district for city council seats other than the Mayor, who will continue to be elected city-wide. Measure M increases the number of council seats, not including the Mayor, from four to six and requires staggering of City Council district elections for those seats with four seats being up for election in 2016 (one of which would thereafter randomly be selected for a 2-year term) with three seats up for election in The Committee is made up of five retired judges who served on the Orange County Superior Court. One, Justice Edward Wallin, who serves as the Committee Chairman, is a resident of the City of Anaheim and a retired Justice of the California Court of Appeal in Orange County. The other four, Judge James Jackman, Judge Nancy Wieben Stock, Judge Stephen Sundvold and Judge Thomas Thrasher, are residents of Orange, Fullerton, Placentia and Villa Park, respectively, and are each longtime residents of Orange County. These four were chosen at random from a group of fourteen retired Orange County Superior Court Judges who filed applications volunteering to serve on this Committee. Summary of Recommendation to City Council: The Committee is pleased to unanimously recommend the attached Committee Recommended Plan (hereinafter "Plan", which, during the Committee s deliberations was referred to as "Map 3" or "Reyes 2, rev. Aug 29")) described in this report to the City Council of the City of Anaheim for its consideration. The Plan consists of two maps, one of the entire City and one showing only the central and western part of the City for ease of reference, as well as a demographic summary page. The districts are numbered one through six, with Council District 1 being the westernmost district and Council District 6 being the easternmost. The Plan that we are forwarding to the City Council has received the overwhelming support of residents who testified from throughout the City at our 10 public meetings held in various locations in the City. More importantly, it received the most cogent and detailed testimony concerning how it met the legal criteria that guide our deliberations. As retired Judges, we have spent our careers hearing cases in which we hear evidence and apply the law to the facts utilizing our own experiences, observations 1
2 and judgment. We have done this in this case and have concluded that this Plan does in fact best meet the legal criteria and best reflect the communities of interest within the City of Anaheim. In undertaking these deliberations we were also provided legal counsel and advice on the several maps that we reviewed during our deliberations. The Plan has a total population deviation of 1.40%, with all deviation justified to follow major roads and keep communities of interest intact. It is a contiguous plan that strongly considers compactness, particularly in light of the elongated shape of the city. As the Plan description below details, it carefully delineates communities of interest as articulated in testimony during our public meetings. The Plan utilizes natural and man-made boundaries that are logical and easy to follow. This Plan carefully addresses voting rights. Significant and substantial public testimony supported how this Plan gives minority groups, particularly the large Latino population, the opportunity to elect candidates of their choice (this is also discussed below in more detail). Finally, we heard a substantial amount of support for this Plan from many individuals and groups from throughout the city, including support from those that had submitted "competing" maps, including maps that were in the final grouping of maps considered by the Committee (i.e., supporters of Map 1 and Map 2 before the Committee). II. Public Outreach A comprehensive outreach plan, Shape Anaheim s Future, was developed and presented to the Committee. Outreach continued throughout this process which contributed to the notable community turnout and participation by over 600 attendees at public meetings held throughout the city from May through September, including submission of over 30 boundary map proposals. Samples of the city s outreach efforts are attached (Attachment E) and include: o Designated districting webpage ( hosted all districting information (agendas, minutes, meeting videos, draft maps, public participation toolkit, Committee meeting calendar, and related documents etc.). A translation tool was made available to translate all related webpages (Spanish, Vietnamese, Korean and Vietnamese). o Public Service Announcements (PSA) Designed to encourage residents to join the conversation of districting. Anaheim residents participated in filming seven different PSAs (English and Spanish) and one group PSA explaining the process and encouraging participation. PSAs were aired on Anaheim s local channel, Time Warner cable, YouTube, linked to blasts prior to Committee meetings, and posted on the districting webpage. o E-Postcards grass roots effort to pass-forward information that was ed prior to each Committee meeting (English and Spanish, with other languages available upon request) to groups/individuals identified by city staff in Police, Fire, Community Services, Pubic Utilities and Planning; 2
3 included community leaders, organizations, faith based groups, individuals, as well as anyone who submitted map proposals and provided an address and individuals who signed up at meetings and/or subscribed online. o Press Releases sent prior to each Community meeting to e-subscribers (over 10,000) and other city lists, including Police Chief s Advisory Board and Chief s Neighborhood Advisory Council, which represents 22 city neighborhoods. o Social Media (Facebook and Twitter) posted e-postcards, press releases and general meeting announcements prior to each Committee meeting. o Fast Facts (English, Spanish, Vietnamese and Tagalog) One page quick facts with meeting calendar. Placed at city libraries, community centers, city hall, provided to city field personnel and distributed hundreds of copies to residents for distribution. o Frequently Asked Questions printed and posted online. o Public Utility Newsletter (over 115,000 residents and businesses). o Utility bill inserts. o Ad placement in: o Anaheim Magazine - online and print, reaching over 119,000 residents and businesses. o Andy Anaheim monthly newsletter of city highlights reaching over 10,000 subscribers. o Community Services, Your Community Guide publication (Spanish Tu Comunidad). o Media Outlets: o Articles written publicizing the process OC Register, Orange Juice Blog, Anaheim Blog, OC Weekly, and Excelsior (Spanish paper). o Columns in OC Register, Our Towns Brief section and Anaheim Bulletin, community section. o Publicized by KPCC radio and Orange County Line- KCRW-FM o Paid ads in print and online OC Register, Anaheim Bulletin, The Notice, and Excelsior. o Aired all Committee meetings on ACTV (as well as posted online). o Save Water Expo provided literature at city booth (June 6). o Presented update and process at Anaheim Beautiful luncheon, consisting of community volunteers and guests. In addition to the foregoing outreach, following the release of consultant draft map plans, the City Clerk and city s demographer attended all neighborhood council meetings (west, south, central and east Anaheim) to present the maps, encourage further participation and remind the public of the timeline to submit map proposals. III. The Committee Process The Committee conducted 10 public meetings from May through September to hear input from the public regarding the establishment of boundaries for the six council 3
4 districts. The meetings have been held at locations throughout the City. Committee meetings have been well-attended and there have been numerous public speakers at each meeting. In addition, the City Clerk and the demographic consultant made presentations to all four Neighborhood Councils in July to encourage public involvement in this process and to receive additional public input. The City s demographic consultant and special legal counsel briefed the Committee on several occasions on the Constitutional, statutory and case law criteria for districting and there has been a large amount of public testimony regarding issues such as population equality, compactness and contiguity of districts, natural and man-made features, and communities of interest. The Committee has received more than thirty districting proposals (some of which were revised and modified with assistance of the demographer) from sixteen different individuals or groups. Members of the public have provided many comments on these proposals. The proposals submitted by the community and demographic consultant, in addition to the written comments on these proposals are attached to this Final Report. The agendas for all Committee meetings were available in English, Spanish, Vietnamese, Korean and Chinese. A Spanish interpreter was available at each meeting and interpreters for other languages were available upon request. Half of the meetings were held at City Hall because of its central location and the enhanced ability to videotape meetings in the Council Chambers, the other half of the meetings, as indicated below, were held in the west, south and east portions of the City. The minutes for all Committee meetings through August 26 are attached to this Final Report. The City Clerk will provide the minutes of later meetings as they are prepared. The first Committee meeting was held on May 12, 2015 at City Hall and was an organizational meeting at which the Committee and public heard presentations on the districting process and legal criteria. The Committee established a schedule of ten meetings with the first four meetings designed primarily to receive input on communities of interest and the following six meetings to receive and review districting plans submitted by the public. Approximately 25 people attended. Eight members of the public spoke regarding the process, during the two agendized public comment opportunities. The second Committee meeting on May 27 was held at City Hall and had more detailed presentations on the legal criteria and the process, including instruction on how members of the public could submit their own districting plans using the Public Participation Kit that was available in hard copy and on the internet. It was announced at this meeting and stated on the agendas for all following meetings beginning with the June 4 meeting that the demographer would be available for an hour before each meeting and immediately after each meeting to help members of the public prepare their own districting plans. Approximately 45 people attended. Fourteen members of the public spoke. 4
5 The third meeting was held on June 4 at the Brookhurst Community Center in west Anaheim. It was announced that for the meeting on July 1, the City s demographer would produce three sample plans with maps and statistical data. This was to stimulate public comment and encourage the public to submit plans of their own. Approximately 38 people attended. Sixteen members of the public spoke, many of whom spoke to their communities of interest in west Anaheim. The fourth meeting was held on June 9 at the East Anaheim Community Center. It was once again announced that members of the public were encouraged to submit their plans by July 1 so the demographer could review those plans and provide input to the submitter. Approximately 35 people attended. Six members of the public spoke. After taking public testimony, the Committee provided direction to the demographer on the criteria that should be used in preparing the sample plans. The fifth meeting was held on July 1 at City Hall. The demographer presented his three sample districting plans. Members of the public were reminded that they should submit their plans by July 31 in order for the demographer to review them and work with the submitter on any corrections. It was also announced that the demographer and City Clerk would be making presentations at each of the four Neighborhood Council meetings held in various parts of the City on July 15, 16, 22 and 23 and be available before and after each of those meetings to assist the public in creating their own plans or in reviewing available plans. The demographer also announced his availability all day on July 16 and July 23 to meet with individuals or groups interested in this process. The demographer did receive requests to meet on those dates and met with individuals and groups from various parts of the City in order to assist them in reviewing demographic information so they could provide input to the Committee. Approximately 74 people attended. Nineteen members of the public spoke. The sixth meeting was held on July 8 at the Ponderosa Family Resource Center in south Anaheim. Staff reminded the public of the July 31 st deadline for submitting proposals as well as the demographer s availability on July 16 and 23. Approximately 45 people attended. Sixteen members of the public spoke, many of whom spoke to their communities of interest in south Anaheim. At this meeting, Oscar Reyes spoke about his original plan. Based on all the testimony received, the Committee directed the demographer to prepare an additional sample plan that would divide the Anaheim Resort area and keep the historic Colony together. The seventh Committee meeting, which followed the four Neighborhood Council meetings, was held on August 19 in City Hall. By this date, the City had received 20 complete submittals including maps and statistics plus one submission of a single district. Approximately 130 people were in attendance. Twenty-two people spoke, many detailing the features of their own submission. In addition, the demographer presented Consultant Draft 4 to the Committee, which responded to Committee direction at the July 8 th meeting. At this meeting, Mr. Reyes spoke about his revised plan, titled "Reyes 2." This plan made a substantial modification to the westernmost 5
6 two districts in his original plan, shaping them vertically instead of horizontally in response to community concerns expressed by those in west Anaheim. Several members of the public expressed support for the Reyes Map 2 and some suggested possible further modifications to it. Individuals from the Colony area spoke in favor of the boundaries of the central district in Consultant Map 3. The Committee selected five maps for focused review at the next meeting. These were Chuchua Map 4, Gagne Map 1, Reyes Map 2 and Consultant Drafts 3 and 4. The Committee directed the demographer to report on what it would take to draw two majority- Latino by CVAP districts into Chuchua Map 4 and Reyes Map 2. The eighth meeting was held on August 26 at Western High School in west Anaheim. The demographer provided test maps showing versions of Chuchua Map 4 and Reyes Map 2 with two majority-latino by CVAP districts. Approximately 120 people were in attendance. Twenty-two people spoke, including several supporting their own submittals. A large majority of those present expressed support for Reyes Map 2 with some suggesting possible modifications, but no public comment favored and several opposed the demographer s test map that had modified district boundaries to form a second Latino CVAP majority district. The speakers expressed that the changes necessary to create such a district would break up established communities of interest and would weaken the Latino voting strength in the third most heavily Latino district. The Committee selected three maps for further focused review at the next meeting. These were Chuchua Map 4 (renamed by staff as "Map 1"), Gagne Map 1 (renamed by staff as "Map 2") and Reyes Map 2 (renamed by staff as "Map 3"). The Committee then directed the demographer to report on options for the two districts west of Euclid and to draw in the border between Districts 5 and 6 such that all of the Tustin/La Palma intersection was in District 6. The ninth meeting was held on September 8 at Loara High School in south Anaheim. The demographer reported on options on the two districts west of Euclid as well as on the border between Districts 5 and 6. By this point, several modified versions of earlier plans had been submitted. The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) submitted a revised map designated LULAC Map 1, Rev. Sept. 4. Greg Diamond submitted on behalf of Brian Chuchua several revisions to the earlier Chuchua map. The three plans that received primary focus were Map 1 (Chuchua Map 4), Map 2 (Gagne Map 1) and Map 3 (Reyes Map 2, rev. Aug 29). Approximately 115 people were in attendance. Twenty-six people spoke. Several speakers from various areas of the City spoke in favor of Map 3 (Reyes Map 2, rev. Aug. 29) including speakers who had earlier favored other plans, one of the plaintiffs in the settled litigation Moreno v. Anaheim and others who withdrew their own maps in favor of Map 3. Other speakers who continued to favor other plans also commented favorably on the Map 3 plan including Greg Diamond on behalf of Chuchua 4, Benita Gagne on behalf of Gagne 1 and Zeke Hernandez on behalf of LULAC Map 1, Rev. Sept. 4. Several who supported Map 3 expressed their support for the proposed modification to the District 5/6 boundary. Following the conclusion of public testimony and comments by members of the Committee, it was moved by Judge Sundvold, seconded by Judge Stock and unanimously approved by the Committee to 6
7 tentatively select the Map 3 plan (Reyes 2, rev. Aug 29), as amended by a technical amendment to the boundary line between Districts 5 and 6, to move forward for further discussion and potential action as the recommendation of this Committee to the City Council and direct Staff to prepare a Final Report that includes that plan as amended for this Committee s consideration, discussion and possible action at our meeting on September 16 at City Hall. The tenth meeting, at which this report is being considered, is being held on September 16 to hear further public comment and to consider, discuss and possibly act upon the draft report. IV. Districting Criteria The Committee provided direction to the demographer and the public at the June 9 meeting on the criteria by which we would be evaluating the plans. These are guided by the United States Constitution, California statute and binding court precedent, including precedent of the United States Supreme Court. The criteria discussed were: Compliance with Federal law and Supreme Court guidance: o Total population equality (also required by state law) o Compliance with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 Compliance with California Elections Code section 21620: o Topography o Geography o Cohesiveness, contiguity, integrity, and compactness of territory o Communities of Interest Future population growth The Committee carefully considered all the proposals received and the input from members of the public. In the opinion of the Committee, the Plan (Map 3) best meets the legal criteria for districting and the needs of the City s residents. A summary of how the Plan meets these criteria is as follows: Population Equality. The total population deviation between the largest and smallest district is only 1.40%. The City s total population at the time of the 2010 Census, which is the population we are required to use by California Elections Code Section 21620, is 336,265. This means that the ideal population per district is 56,044. The Plan has a total population deviation of only 1.40% between largest to smallest. The largest district by population is District 1, which is only 424 people (0.76%) over ideal and the smallest by population is District 3, which is only 363 people (0.65%) below ideal. (While.76 and.65 add up to 1.41, this is due to rounding. The total deviation is only 1.40%.) In addition to the legal requirement for total population equality, numerous public comments expressed the importance of this criterion as a factor in support for maps. 7
8 Federal Voting Rights Act. The Committee received extensive testimony regarding whether a plan with two out of the six districts with a majority of Latino Citizen Voting Age Population (hereinafter "CVAP") would be more effective in giving Latinos the opportunity to elect candidates of their choice than a plan with one district with a Latino majority CVAP and two districts with a substantial Latino plurality CVAP. We were ultimately persuaded by the overwhelming testimony of the Latino community, and others, that there is an effective opportunity to elect candidates of their choice in three districts with the Plan we are recommending and that such an opportunity is preferable to having a possibly greater opportunity to elect candidates of their choice in two districts but a far lesser opportunity in a third district. Of course, while this criteria was important to us in ascertaining compliance with Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act, we are equally persuaded that the recommended Plan best achieves other traditional districting criteria as discussed in this Final Report. Ethnicity was not the predominant factor in our decision to recommend the Plan. While predicting the outcome of future elections in districts that have not yet been created and for which candidates have not even filed to run is beyond the powers or scope of this Committee, we were persuaded by overwhelming public testimony that a plan with one district having a majority of Latino Citizens of Voting Age and two districts with a significant plurality of Latino Citizens of Voting Age is most consistent with the goals of the Federal Voting Rights Act. Among the points brought out in the testimony were: (1) the Latino Citizen Voting Age population is growing and may already be larger than is reflected in the five year average in the American Community Survey, (2.) the Latino community is becoming more politically active since the mobilization for the successful passage of Measures L and M, (3) the working class neighborhoods in these districts are anticipated to have many voters of other ethnicities who tend to vote similarly to Latinos, and (4) creating two Latino majority districts by necessity reduces the Latino population in adjacent districts, such that election of a third Latino council member is much more difficult. Finally, we again point out that the recommended Plan best addresses the other criteria set forth in the law, notwithstanding this criterion. The Recommended Plan has one district with a Latino CVAP over 50% (District 3 at 50.8%) and two districts with a Latino CVAP plurality (District 4 at 46.8% and District 5 at 44.3%). One plan was submitted that had three districts with a majority of Latino Citizens of Voting Age but that plan was not supported by its own authors nor by anyone else who spoke. Furthermore, the Committee found that map to have districts that were not compact and which split communities of interest. It appeared that the map used race as its predominant, if not sole, criteria. Citizen Voting Age Population figures relate to the ability of Latinos to elect candidates of their choice. As described by the demographer, these are five-year averages taken from the American Community Survey of Citywide, the Latino CVAP is increasing at around 0.6% per year. It would be reasonable to assume that number is somewhat larger in the central parts of the City where the 8
9 Latino majority and plurality districts are located. Several speakers testified to their belief that the actual percentages in 2015 are higher than this, thereby effectively making District 4 a Latino CVAP majority district and making District 5 a more effective Latino plurality district for the elections in 2016 and future years. As discussed above, they testified repeatedly that they prefer the opportunity to elect three members to the City Council to having a higher population in two districts but a correspondingly smaller population in a third. Significantly, this position was shared by at least two speakers who are Latino and previously were candidates for City Council. The only testimony to the contrary was from two Latino individuals who do not reside in Anaheim. Topography, Geography, Contiguity, and Compactness. The districts are contiguous and follow natural and man-made boundaries, such as Euclid Ave, Magnolia Ave., East Street and State College Blvd. The districts are as compact as possible given the irregular shape of the City, the need to respect communities of interest, and the need for equal population among the districts. Communities of Interest. The districts in this Plan carefully delineate communities of interest as evidenced by the public testimony concerning areas such as west Anaheim, the Colony, the Resort Area, the Platinum Triangle, the Ponderosa neighborhoods, areas of west Anaheim north of Interstate 5 (referred to by some community members as the "Bermuda Triangle"), Little Arabia and Anaheim Hills. A full list of discussed communities of interest in each district is included under the District Descriptions below. Another important dimension of communities of interest are the groups that have spoken out in favor of the Plan. To date, the Plan has drawn the support of several groups that are active in Anaheim. Speakers stated that they represented the Orange County Labor Federation, the Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development (OCCORD), the Korean Resource Center, the Council for American Islamic Relations, the Arab-American Chamber of Commerce, The Asian- Pacific Islander Community Association, Los Amigos and Unite Here. One type of community of interest expressed by the public is to keep elementary school attendance boundaries wholly or substantially within a single City Council district. Speakers favored having the areas on both sides of the County island in the same District, District 2. One reason stated was that residents tend to form a community around their local elementary schools and the elementary schools in that area draw students from both sides of the County island. These are the Salk and Disney elementary schools in the Magnolia School District. Additionally, Juliette Low Elementary School lies within this corridor and creates this continuity with the schools along the Brookhurst Corridor. For similar reasons, supporters of the Plan wanted to place the portions of the Centralia and Savanna Elementary School Districts that lie within Anaheim entirely within District 1. In District 4, the following attendance areas are kept entirely 9
10 within the District boundaries: Stoddard, Palm Lane, Ponderosa, Olive Street, Orange Grove, and Roosevelt Elementary Schools. The 5 th district includes the area west of State College north of Santa Ana Avenue. This allowed for the people on Anna Drive, who are in the Sunkist Elementary School District area to be in the same council district as well as keep the Juarez and Guinn attendance areas in the same district. Future Population Growth. Because we are between Censuses, the population figures from the 2010 Census may be out of date. In order to consider this, the demographer looked at large-scale (more than 50 unit) developments throughout the city. All areas of the city except east Anaheim had projects either underway or planned. While the number of units planned is not equal throughout Anaheim, we can only make guesses about potential occupancy. As a result, a small shift to the boundary between Districts 5 and 6 as directed by this Committee ensures each district has at least one planned multi-unit development. V. The Recommended Plan District Descriptions and Communities of Interest Council District 1 is bounded by Magnolia Avenue toward the southern end of the city north to Crescent Avenue, then east to Brookhurst Road, then north to the city border. It is bounded on three sides by the city border. This district has a Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) plurality of 37% non-hispanic White, with 31% Latino, and 24% Asian-American. This district contains Brookhurst Community Center, the West Anaheim Youth Center, and Haskett Library. The Committee heard testimony from residents in the area west of Magnolia south of the City of Buena Park that those areas share a common interest and should be kept together if possible. In addition, residents of the triangular area bordered by the I-5, the 91 freeway and Brookhurst consider themselves part of west Anaheim and share common concerns about freeway noise and traffic with the areas along La Palma just south of I-5. The Committee also heard testimony that the residents north of Crescent and west of Brookhurst have similar issues to the residents south of Crescent and west of Magnolia. Council District 2 includes all of the city west of Euclid Street and east of District 1. District 2 has a CVAP plurality of 38% White, with 32% Latino and 24% Asian- American. This district contains the Dad Miller Golf Course and surrounds the County Island on three sides. Many speakers, even those who preferred other alignments of the District 1 and 2 boundary, favored using Euclid as a clear boundary line between Districts 1 and 2 and the remainder of the city. In addition, this district contains all of the commercial areas along Brookhurst known as Little Arabia. Speakers from Little Arabia spoke in favor of keeping the business community on both sides of Brookhurst south of 10
11 Lincoln Avenue together in a single district along with the large Asian and Middle Eastern populations. Speakers from the southern part of the District strongly favored having the areas on both sides of the County island in the same District. Council District 3 includes downtown Anaheim north of South Street between Euclid Street and East Street, including the entire historic Anaheim Colony area. District 3 has a CVAP majority of 51% Latino with 33% White and 12% Asian- American. Also, over 50% of registered voters had Spanish surnames in This district contains City Hall, the Central Library, several parks, and other city facilities in Downtown Anaheim. Residents from the Colony spoke strongly about their desire to be in one district. They also expressed a desire to be in the same district as other historic neighborhoods north and west of the Colony, including Five Points and Historic La Palma. Council District 4 includes the Anaheim Resort area, the Ponderosa neighborhood and other southern Anaheim neighborhoods south of District 3. District 4 has a CVAP plurality of 47% Latino, with 35% White and 14% Asian-American. This district includes the Ponderosa and Euclid Libraries and Ponderosa Family Resource Center. In addition, it contains the vast majority of the Anaheim Resort Area, which includes Disneyland and the Anaheim Convention Center, and most of the commercial developments serving the Resort Area. While there was early testimony favoring putting the entire southern part of the City in one Council District (which would have combined the Anaheim Resort and Platinum Triangle areas into the same district), several of those speakers came to subsequent meetings and favored the boundary line between Council Districts 4 and 5 that places the Anaheim Resort area and the Platinum Triangle in separate districts. It was felt that residents would be better-served by having a council member for each of those areas. Much of the testimony focused on the connections between the Ponderosa, Guinida Park, and adjacent neighborhoods north of Ball Road. Council District 5 includes most of the Platinum Triangle as well as the 57 freeway corridor with residents on both sides of the 57 freeway sharing its impacts. District 5 has a CVAP plurality of 44% Latino, with 37% White and 13% Asian-American. This district contains the Sunkist Library and the Miraloma Community Center in addition to the Angels Stadium, the Honda Center, the ARTIC facility, and approximately half of Anaheim Canyon. Residents from the Miraloma area expressed a strong community of interest with areas to the west along La Palma rather than to the east and this keeps the northeastern parts of central Anaheim together. 11
12 Council District 6 consists of east Anaheim, primarily Anaheim Hills. District 6 has a CVAP majority of 63% White, 17% Asian-American and 16% Latino. This district contains the East Anaheim Community Center, East Anaheim and Canyon Hills Libraries, the Oak Canyon Nature Center, and the east half of Anaheim Canyon. Given the shape of the Anaheim Hills area including its narrow geographical connection to the remainder of the City and that its population is nearly identical to the ideal District population, there was near-unanimity among all the proposals for the shape of this District. The only issue was the precise line between Districts 5 and 6. Many plans initially placed this line on Tustin Avenue. However, due to future development potential in the area east of Miller St and east of Glassell below La Palma in the Canyon Business Center, it was considered best to draw the line at this point. VI. Attachments This report includes the following attached documents that are incorporated into this report by reference: Committee Recommended Plan including two maps and a demographic summary (Attachment A). All correspondence received by the committee via U.S. Mail, hand delivery, or (Attachment B). All proposals submitted by members of the public and the draft sample plans submitted by the demographer (Attachment C, numbered C1-C5 (Consultant Drafts); T1-T2 (Test Maps); P1-P32 (Public Submissions), respectively, attached to this report, accordingly). The agendas, staff reports and minutes of all meetings of the Committee (Attachment D). Samples of the press releases, blasts, press coverage and other public outreach documents (Attachment E). CAO v3 12
City of Anaheim OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
City of Anaheim OFFIC OF TH CITY CLRK ate: September 16, 201 To: From: Subject: Advisory Committee on lectoral istricts Linda N. Andal, City Clerk Item No. 1 Final Report At the September 8, 201 meeting,
More informationMay 9, City of South San Francisco 2018 Districting Initial Hearings
City of South San Francisco 2018 Districting Initial Hearings South SF is not alone facing CVRA 2 Switched (or in the process of switching) as a result of CVRA: At least 165 school districts 28 Community
More informationCity of Placentia By-District Elections Briefing. February 6, 2018
www.drawplacentia.org City of Placentia By-District Elections Briefing Tentative Project Timeline 2 Date February 6 February 20 March 11 No later than March 13 March 20 Event 1 st hearing: gather public
More informationLegal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Districts
Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Districts A Presentation by: Sean Welch Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni, LLP to the City of Martinez January 10, 2018 City of Martinez Establishment
More informationSweetwater Union High School District Demographic and Districting Introduction
Sweetwater Union High School District Demographic and Districting Introduction Douglas Johnson, President National Demographics Corporation (NDC) 2 District General Demographics 2008 2012 American Community
More informationCity of Oakland 2013 Redistricting Town Hall forum
City of Oakland 2013 Redistricting Town Hall forum 6/6/2013 Agenda 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Why Redistricting is important 3. Presentation on Redistricting Process 4. How to get involved 5. Group
More informationORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary
ORDINANCE NO. 2866 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE ADDING SECTIONS 2.04.030 AND 2.04.040 TO CHAPTER 2.04 OF TITLE 2 OF THE GARDEN GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE IMPLEMENTING BY-DISTRICT
More informationIUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. May 8, 2018
IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION May 8, 2018 No Impact on School Attendance Areas The election method for the members of the IUSD Board of Education has no impact on school district or student
More information4/4/2017. The Foundation. What is the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA)? CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT PUTTING THE 2016 LEGISLATION INTO PRACTICE
CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT PUTTING THE 2016 LEGISLATION INTO PRACTICE Speakers Randi Johl, MMC, CCAC Legislative Director/Temecula City Clerk Shalice Tilton, MMC, City Clerk, Buena Park Dane Hutchings,
More informationOctober 17, Lompoc 2017 Districting Initial Hearings
Lompoc 2017 Districting Initial Hearings Lompoc is not alone facing CVRA 2 Switched (or in the process of switching) as a result of CVRA: At least 157 school districts 28 Community College Districts More
More informationCALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW
CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW : Elimination of the Citizens Redistricting Commission. Changes to the Redistricting Process in California. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. By, Anna Buck J.D.,
More informationCITY OF VALLEJO SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING: ACTION ITEM A. City of Vallejo Districting Criteria and Process
CITY OF VALLEJO SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING: ACTION ITEM A City of Vallejo Districting Criteria and Process December 19, 2018 Election Systems 2 1. At Large 2. From District or Residence Districts 3.
More informationDecember 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections
December 12, 2017 City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections Project Timeline 2 Date December 12 January 3 January 5 No later than January 10 January 17 January 29 February 7 February 20 February
More informationCity of Rancho Cucamonga Presentation of Draft Maps
City of Rancho Cucamonga Presentation of Draft Maps Douglas Johnson, President Justin Levitt, Vice President Proposed Transition Timeline 2 Date Event March 16 March 25 April 4 Council Hearing. Council
More informationDecember 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections
December 12, 2017 City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections Project Timeline 2 Date December 12 January 3 January 5 No later than January 10 January 17 January 29 February 7 February 20 February
More informationItem 10A 1 of 37
MEETING DATE: 9/06/17 PREPARED BY: Christopher Skinnell, Special Counsel via City Attorney s Office Risk Dept. Manager DEPARTMENT: City Attorney CITY MANAGER: Karen Brust SUBJECT: District-Based Elections/composition
More informationCITY OF SACRAMENTO MEASURE L
CITY OF SACRAMENTO MEASURE L L Shall the City of Sacramento Charter be amended to establish a redistricting commission that is independent of the city council and that has sole authority for establishing
More informationOctober 30, City of Menlo Park Introduction to Election Systems
October 30, 2017 City of Menlo Park Introduction to Election Systems California Voting Rights Act Impact 2 Switched (or in the process of switching) as a result of California Voting Rights Act challenges:
More informationIntroduction to the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Peter Fagen, F3 Larry Ferchaw, CS James Ayden, F3 July 24, 2017
Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Peter Fagen, F3 Larry Ferchaw, CS James Ayden, F3 July 24, 2017 1 Purpose of Discussion Introduction to CVRA Discuss where District stands Next Steps
More informationNote: Wards 1, 3 and 5 will hold elections on November 3, 2020; and Wards 2, 4 and 6 will hold
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: OCTOBER 30, 2018 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: HOLD HEARING # 4 TO AMEND COUNCIL WARD BOUNDARIES AND INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO AMEND
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Analysis of United Student District Amendment Redistricting Plan
Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR October 15, 2013 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, City Manager Submitted by: Mark Numainville, City Clerk Subject:
More informationSubmitted by: ASSEMBLY MEMBERS HALL, TRAIN!
Submitted by: ASSEMBLY MEMBERS HALL, TRAIN! Prepared by: Dept. of Law CLERK'S OFFICE For reading: October 30, 2012 APPROVED As Amended. ~ l).~j 3 ~J;;J.. - O pfa'lfej ;;;:J..._. 1 :. A~~...:--- bl El.
More informationThe California Voting Rights Act
The California Voting Rights Act A Presentation by: Chris Skinnell Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni, LLP for The City of San Rafael November 20, 2017 The California Voting Rights Act 1 The California
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs JOSE MORENO, AMIN DAVID, and CONSUELO GARCIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 BELINDA ESCOBOSA HELZER, CA Bar No. bescobosahelzer@aclu-sc.org BARDIS VAKILI, CA Bar No. bvakili@aclu-sc.org ACLU Foundation of Southern California 00 N Broadway, Suite Santa Ana, CA 0 (1) 0-;
More informationRedistricting 101 Why Redistrict?
Redistricting 101 Why Redistrict? Supreme Court interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, specifically: - for Congress, Article 1, Sec. 2. and Section 2 of the 14 th Amendment - for all others, the equal
More informationCITY OF ANAHEIM MAYOR S TASK FORCE WELCOMING ANAHEIM INITIATIVE. MINUTES May 26, 2017
CITY OF ANAHEIM MAYOR S TASK FORCE WELCOMING ANAHEIM INITIATIVE MINUTES Agenda Posting: A complete copy of the Anaheim Sister City Commission Agenda was posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. at
More informationCITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Constitutional Amendment proposed by the Citizens Constitutional Amendment Drafting Committee blends a principled approach to redistricting
More informationPROPERTY TAX RATES FOR FY FOR TAXING AGENCIES IN ORANGE COUNTY
Attachment 1 PROPERTY TAX RATES FOR FY 2016-17 FOR TAXING AGENCIES IN ORANGE COUNTY COMPILED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF ERIC H. WOOLERY, CPA ORANGE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER 1 PROPERTY TAX RATES FOR FY 2016-17
More informationPresentation to the Orange County Committee on School District Organization
Presentation to the Orange County Committee on School District Organization August 16, 2017 Dr. Gregory Franklin, Superintendent Peter Fagen, Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost Jonathan Salt, Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost
More informationCity of LEMOORE CALIFORNIA. Staff Report
City of LEMOORE CALIFORNIA 711 West Cinnamon Drive Lemoore, California 93245 (559) 924-6700 Fax (559) 924-9003 Staff Report To: Lemoore City Council From: Nathan Olson, Interim City Manager Date: January
More informationCity of Redlands Introduction to 2016 Districting
City of Redlands Introduction to 2016 Districting Douglas Johnson, President Justin Levitt, Vice President Election Systems 2 1. At Large Candidates can reside anywhere in the jurisdiction All voters vote
More informationPUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY ON CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS TO BE ESTABLISHED FOR DISTRICT-BASED ELECTIONS
Agenda Item No. 8A May 22, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, City Manager Melinda C. H. Stewart, City Attorney Michelle Thornbrugh, City Clerk (Staff Contact:
More information4/23/2018. CCAC Annual Conference April 19, a.m. 12 p.m. Break w/ Exhibitors 10 a.m. 10:30 a.m.
CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT TRANSITIONING FROM AT LARGE TO BY DISTRICT ELECTIONS: A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR CITY CLERKS SPEAKERS DOUG JOHNSON, PRINCIPAL, NATIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS CORP. SHALICE TILTON, MMC, NDC
More informationTHE BIGGEST BRAND IN THE INDUSTRY RUNNING 10 YEARS STRONG
THE BIGGEST BRAND IN THE INDUSTRY RUNNING 10 YEARS STRONG Quinceanera.com MAGAZINE Our monthly print is distributed during our s and in strategic regions in Southern California. Quinceanera.com covers,
More informationJuly 19, Washington Unified 2018 Districting
Washington Unified 2018 Districting Project Timeline 2 Date June 14 June 20 June 28 No later than July 12 July 19 August 22 August 23 September 5 September 13 September 19 September 27 TBD Event 1 st hearing:
More informationBOUNDARY COMMISSION St. Louis County, Missouri RULES
BOUNDARY COMMISSION St. Louis County, Missouri RULES May 4, 2000 Revised: December 12, 2005 Revised: August 25, 2011 1 BOUNDARY COMMISSION, ST. LOUIS COUNTY RULES ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS A. APPLICATION FEE
More informationOctober 16, Whittier Union High School District Introduction to Districting
Whittier Union High School District Introduction to Districting Districting Rules 2 Federal Laws Equal Population Federal Voting Rights Act No Racial Gerrymandering Communities of interest Compact Contiguous
More informationVan Nuys Neighborhood Council Bylaws
Van Nuys Neighborhood Council Bylaws Table of Contents Article I NAME 3 Article II PURPOSE. 3 Article III BOUNDARIES.. 4 Section 1: Boundary Description Section 2: Internal Boundaries Article IV STAKEHOLDER.
More informationLocal Opportunities for Redistricting Reform
Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform March 2016 Research commissioned by Wisconsin Voices for Our Democracy 2020 Coalition Introduction The process of redistricting has long-lasting impacts on
More informationLOS ANGELES COUNTY Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk LAvote.net
LOS ANGELES COUNTY Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk MEDIA KIT June 7, 2016 Presidential Primary Election LAvote.net MESSAGE FROM THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS On June 7, nearly five million registered voters
More informationOrange County Registrar of Voters. June 2016 Presidential Primary Survey Report
2016 Orange County Registrar of Voters June 2016 Presidential Primary Survey Report Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Voter Experience Survey 7 Poll Worker Survey 18 Training Survey 29 Delivery Survey
More informationOrange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP OCTOBER 10, 2013 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS CEW MINUTES October 10, 2013 Orange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP OCTOBER 10, 2013 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Neal Kelley, Registrar
More informationRequest to Change Election System without an Election Election Waiver Ed. Code, 72036
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR S OFFICE 1102 Q STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95811-6549 (916) 445-8752 HTTP://WWW.CCCCO.EDU Request to Change Election System without an Election Election
More informationAMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (hereinafter Agreement ) is entered into as of, 2016, by and between CITY OF PLACENTIA, a California charter law municipal corporation, ( Placentia
More informationRESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. July 26, 2016
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-0258 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council July 26, 2016 CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE SUBMITTAL TO THE VOTERS ESTABLISHING AN INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION ACT BALLOT MEASURE
More informationOrange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP MARCH 13, 2014 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS CEW MINUTES March 13, 2014 Orange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP MARCH 13, 2014 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Chairman Eugene Lee called
More informationOrange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP MARCH 5, 2015 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS CEW MINUTES March 5, 2015 Orange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP MARCH 5, 2015 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Chair Lucinda Williams called
More informationNEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010
NEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010 Presentation of John H. Snyder on behalf of the Election Law Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York Senator
More informationPROTECTING CALIFORNIA S DEMOCRACY: ENSURING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE BILINGUAL VOTING ASSISTANCE LAWS
PROTECTING CALIFORNIA S DEMOCRACY: ENSURING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE BILINGUAL VOTING ASSISTANCE LAWS For more information, contact Eugene Lee, Voting Rights Project Director, Asian Pacific American
More informationThe California Voting Rights Act: Recent Legislation & Litigation Outcomes
The California Voting Rights Act: Recent Legislation & Litigation Outcomes Prepared By: James L. Markman Youstina N. Aziz Dr. Douglas Johnson May 3, 2018 League of California Cities: City Attorneys Spring
More informationCity Council Election System Changes Project. CVRA Community Input Workshop
City Council Election System Changes Project CVRA Presentation Overview» Project Overview» Small Group Exercise Method to elect the mayor Factors to consider when drawing districts» Opportunities for Public
More informationLOS ANGELES COUNTY Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk MEDIA KIT LAVote.net Nov.6,2018 General Election
LOS ANGELES COUNTY Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk MEDIA KIT LAVote.net Nov.6,2018 General Election Rev. 9/26/2018 MESSAGE FROM THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS On November 6, more than 5 million registered voters
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL
PRIOR PASSAGE - NONE PRIOR PRINTER'S NOS., 10 PRINTER'S NO. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL No. Session of 01 INTRODUCED BY BOSCOLA, SCAVELLO, BROWNE, SCHWANK, BLAKE, DINNIMAN, LEACH,
More informationREDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?
ALABAMA NAME 105 XX STATE LEGISLATURE Process State legislature draws the lines Contiguity for Senate districts For Senate, follow county boundaries when practicable No multimember Senate districts Population
More informationMay 11, I. Breach of the Settlement Agreement
National Headquarters MALDEF Nonprofit Center 634 S. Spring Street, 12 th Fl. Los Ángeles, CA 90014 TEL: 213.629.2512 Fax: 213.629.0266 Atlanta Program Office 500 West Lanier Avenue Suite 908 Fayetteville,
More informationCity of Bellingham Residential Survey 2013
APPENDICES City of Bellingham Residential Survey 2013 January 2014 Pamela Jull, PhD Rachel Williams, MA Joyce Prigot, PhD Carol Lavoie P.O. Box 1193 1116 Key Street Suite 203 Bellingham, Washington 98227
More informationSequoia Union High School District Districting Public Forums
Sequoia Union High School District Districting Public Forums October 20, 25, 26, 2016 Douglas Johnson, President National Demographics Corporation (NDC) Election Systems 2 1. At Large Candidates can reside
More informationLegal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts
Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts City of Hemet February 9, 2016 City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 1 Process: Basic Overview With Goal of Nov. 2016
More informationVan Nuys Neighborhood Council Bylaws
Van Nuys Neighborhood Council Bylaws Adopted January 27, 2018 1 Van Nuys Neighborhood Council Bylaws Table of Contents Article I NAME.. 4 Article II PURPOSE. 4 Article III BOUNDARIES. 5 Section 1: Boundary
More informationHARBOR CITY NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL
HARBOR CITY NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL BYLAWS APPROVED BY DONE ECEMBER 5, 2011 DECEMBER Bylaws 12-05-11; Page 1 of 15 Bylaws Table of Contents Article I NAME 4 Article II PURPOSE..4 Article III BOUNDARIES..5
More informationCase 1:17-cv TCB-WSD-BBM Document 94-1 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 37
Case 1:17-cv-01427-TCB-WSD-BBM Document 94-1 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 37 REPLY REPORT OF JOWEI CHEN, Ph.D. In response to my December 22, 2017 expert report in this case, Defendants' counsel submitted
More informationFULL TEXT OF MEASURE L CITY OF ANAHEIM
FULL TEXT OF MEASURE L CITY OF ANAHEIM Section 1: TEXT OF AMENDMENTS TO ANAHEIM CITY CHARTER. The City Charter of the City of Anaheim is hereby amended as follows (underlining showing additions and strike-through
More informationInstant Runoff Voting and Its Impact on Racial Minorities Produced by The ew America Foundation and FairVote, June 2008
The Center for Voting and Democracy 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2724 Los Angeles, CA 90010 (213) 480-0994 dutta@newamerica.net www.newamerica.net/politicalreform 6930 Carroll Ave., Suite 610 Takoma Park,
More informationOrange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS CEW MINUTES September 18, 2014 Orange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Vice-Chair Lucinda
More informationCIRCULATOR S AFFIDAVIT
County Page No. It is a class A misdemeanor punishable, notwithstanding the provisions of section 560.021, RSMo, to the contrary, for a term of imprisonment not to exceed one year in the county jail or
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) PLAN
I. Purpose This Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan outlines how the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles ("Court" ) provides equal access to justice for LEP persons consistent with Title
More informationGuide to 2011 Redistricting
Guide to 2011 Redistricting Texas Legislative Council July 2010 1 Guide to 2011 Redistricting Prepared by the Research Division of the Texas Legislative Council Published by the Texas Legislative Council
More informationMEDIA KIT. Daily Journal. Fergus Falls. Newspapers, Inc. Daily Journal Early Edition Fergus Falls The Magazine
Fergus Falls Newspapers, Inc. MEDIA KIT Early Edition Fergus Falls The Magazine www.fergusfallsjournal.com HAS THE LARGEST MARKET PENETRATION 76% MARKET PENETRATION Our reach Many sales people will describe
More informationNeighborhood Problems and Quality of Life
Survey Research Unit School of Public Affairs Baruch College / CUNY 1 Bernard Baruch Way New York, NY 10010 Neighborhood Problems and Quality of Life A survey conducted in collaboration with November 2004
More informationThe California Voting Rights Act What To Do When Your Agency Gets a Letter
The California Voting Rights Act What To Do When Your Agency Gets a Letter Thomas Rice & Doug Johnson Municipal Law Webinar Series November 2, 2017 @bbklaw 2017 Best Best & Krieger LLP Presentation Outline
More information2016 Appointed Boards and Commissions Diversity Survey Report
2016 Appointed Boards and Commissions Diversity Survey Report November 28, 2016 Neighborhood and Community Relations Department 612-673-3737 www.minneapolismn.gov/ncr Table of Contents Introduction...
More informationAPPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966
APPORTIONMENT The League of Women Voters of the United States believes that congressional districts and government legislative bodies should be apportioned substantially on population. The League is convinced
More informationQuiet Revolution in California Local Government Gains Momentum
Quiet Revolution in California Local Government Gains Momentum Justin Levitt, Ph.D. Douglas Johnson, Ph.D. With assistance from: Tyler Finn 17 Tim PLummer 17 Ellen Lempres 18 Shivani Pandya 18 Skip Wiltshire-Gordon
More informationA A P I D ATA Asian American Voter Survey. Sponsored by Civic Leadership USA
A A P I D ATA 2018 Asian American Voter Survey Sponsored by Civic Leadership USA In partnership with Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance AFL-CIO (APALA), and Asian Americans Advancing Justice AAJC CONTENTS
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 HOUSE BILL DRH10050-BK-2 (02/13) Short Title: Nonpartisan Redistricting Commission.
H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE BILL DRH00-BK- (0/) H.B. 0 Feb, HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK D Short Title: Nonpartisan Redistricting Commission. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives
More informationBallot Measures-V Section
V City of San Clemente, Initiative for Election of City Council Members by District Shall the ordinance be adopted to change the manner in which City Council members are elected from at large to by district,
More informationOlympic Park Neighborhood Council Bylaws
Olympic Park Neighborhood Council Bylaws Approved by the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment on September 1, 2015 Approved by the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment on June 12, 2017 Approved by
More informationPolicy and Procedures. of the. Code Enforcement Board. of the. City of Orlando, Florida
Policy and Procedures of the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Orlando, Florida January 2016 INTRODUCTION It is the intent of this Part to promote, protect, and improve the health, safety, and welfare
More informationASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION
30/9/16 ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ON AGENDA ITEMS 12 AND 13 (Presented by the Chairman of the Executive Committee) The attached report on Agenda Items
More informationRanked Choice Voting in Practice:
Ranked Choice Voting in Practice: Candidate Civility in Ranked Choice Elections, 2013 & 2014 Survey Brief In 2013, FairVote received a $300,000 grant from the Democracy Fund to coordinate a research project
More informationMultilingual Access to Elections 2013
Multilingual Access to Elections 2013 Dean C. Logan Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Table of Contents Introduction Introduction Demographics Los Angeles County Electorate Diverse Population Ethnic Composition
More informationAGENDA SUMMARY EUREKA CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENT TO CITY CHARTER SECTION 201 FROM AT-LARGE TO WARD BASED ELECTIONS
AGENDA SUMMARY EUREKA CITY COUNCIL TITLE: AMENDMENT TO CITY CHARTER SECTION 201 FROM AT-LARGE TO WARD BASED ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: CITY ATTORNEY CYNDY DAY-WILSON PRESENTED FOR: Action Information
More informationThe Geographic Disparity in Voter Turnout for Boise City's November 2017 Election The Boise Commons
The Geographic Disparity in Voter Turnout for Boise City's November 2017 Election The Boise Commons November 27, 2017 Matthew Shapiro, Principal Investigator Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 I.
More informationMunicipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other Boundary Changes
Municipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other Boundary Changes «ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE«GREAT CITIES MAKE A GREAT STATE Revised October 0 iii Table of Contents I. State Statutes.... A. Incorporation...
More informationAn Assessment of Ranked-Choice Voting in the San Francisco 2005 Election. Final Report. July 2006
Public Research Institute San Francisco State University 1600 Holloway Ave. San Francisco, CA 94132 Ph.415.338.2978, Fx.415.338.6099 http://pri.sfsu.edu An Assessment of Ranked-Choice Voting in the San
More informationWest Plains Transit System City of West Plains, MO. Title VI Program. Date filed with MoDOT Transit Section:
West Plains Transit System City of West Plains, MO Title VI Program Date filed with MoDOT Transit Section: March 31, 2014 Amended August 26, 2015 1 Title VI Plan Table of Contents A. Introduction / Title
More informationNON-PARTISAN R E S O L U T I O N. THE TOWN and VILLAGE CIVIC CLUB Scarsdale, New York. Original Resolution Adopted December 11, 1930
NON-PARTISAN R E S O L U T I O N THE TOWN and VILLAGE CIVIC CLUB Scarsdale, New York Original Resolution Adopted December 11, 1930 Amended, December 8, 1932 Amended, December 14, 1939 Amended, September
More informationArea Year 2000 Year 2030 Change. Housing Units 3,137,047 4,120, % Housing Units 1,276,578 1,637, % Population 83,070 96,
4.3 POPULATION, HOUSING AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE This section describes potential project-related impacts to population, housing and employment associated with the Canoga Transportation Corridor Project.
More informationWESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL BYLAWS. Table of Contents Approved by Department of Neighborhood Empowerment June 1, 2015
WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL BYLAWS Table of Contents Approved by Department of Neighborhood Empowerment June 1, 2015 Article I NAME 3 Article II PURPOSE. 3 Article III BOUNDARIES.. 4 Section 1: Boundary
More informationOrange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP APRIL 18, 2013 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS CEW MINUTES April 18, 2013 Orange County Registrar of Voters COMMUNITY ELECTION WORKING GROUP APRIL 18, 2013 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Neal Kelley, Registrar of
More informationCITYWATCH PROFILE CITYWATCH PRINCIPALS AND STAFF. CityWatch was founded in September of 2003 by Mark Siegel and Ken Draper.
CITYWATCH PROFILE CityWatch is LA s opinion, news and information website and newsletter. CityWatch reports and provides perspective on the issues that face us in Los Angeles at the neighborhood level.
More informationBYLAWS OF THE P.I.C.O. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL
BYLAWS OF THE P.I.C.O. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL Table of Contents Article I NAME 3 Article II PURPOSE. 3 Article III BOUNDARIES.. 3 Section 1: Boundary Description Section 2: Internal Boundaries Article IV
More informationThe above recitals are all true and correct.
ORDINANCE NUMBER 1109 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 02-0217 TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 19.63
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA THIRD EXTRA SESSION 2016 HOUSE BILL DRH30015-LU-3 (12/13)
H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA THIRD EXTRA SESSION HOUSE BILL DRH0-LU- (/) H.B. Dec, HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK D Short Title: Nonpartisan Redistricting Commission. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representative
More informationFULL TEXT OF MEASURE M CITY OF ANAHEIM
Section 1: TEXT OF AMENDMENTS TO ANAHEIM CITY CHARTER. FULL TEXT OF MEASURE M CITY OF ANAHEIM The City Charter of the City of Anaheim is hereby amended as follows (underlining showing additions and strike-through
More informationOFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER AND THE COMMISSIONER FOR LEGISLATIVE STANDARDS. Business Plan
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER AND THE COMMISSIONER FOR LEGISLATIVE STANDARDS Business Plan 2008-2011 Business Plan 2008-2011 2 Message from the Chief Electoral Officer It is with great pleasure
More informationIUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018
IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION March 27, 2018 No Impact on School Attendance Areas The election method for the members of the IUSD Board of Education has no impact on school or district student
More information3. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS:
Special Meeting AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. May 8, 2017 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: 2-14 (a) Council Voting
More informationRobert McEntire, Chief Business and Financial Officer
GLENDALE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT May 24, 2016 ACTION REPORT NO. 1 TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Board of Education Winfred B. Roberson, Jr., Superintendent Robert McEntire, Chief Business and Financial
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12-00075-01-CR-W-DW MARCUS D. GAMMAGE, Defendant. GOVERNMENT'S
More information