FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Western District of Washington
|
|
- Garey Burke
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Western District of Washington Thomas W. Hillier, II Federal Public Defender April 10, 2005 The Honorable Howard Coble Chairman Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Judiciary Committee United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C The Honorable Bobby Scott Ranking Democrat Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Judiciary Committee United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C Re: Gang Deterrence and Community Protection Act of 2005 (H.R. 1279) Dear Chairman Coble and Representative Scott: I write on behalf of the Federal Public and Community Defenders to strongly oppose the Gang Deterrence and Community Protection Act of 2005 (H.R. 1279), which I understand is scheduled for a hearing and markup on Tuesday, April 12, Section 101 of Title I of the legislation, entitled Criminal street gang prosecutions, would classify as gang crimes a variety of state and federal crimes, many of which involve no violence, no relation to criminal street gang activity, and no particularized harm attributable to criminal street gangs. The statute is vague and overbroad, contains no discernible state of mind requirement, federalizes state crime, and imposes excessive penalties. The enumerated gang crimes include: a crime of violence -- as newly defined in section 112 to include offenses that are misdemeanors in some states (but not others), and non-violent drug crimes -- as well as the whole panoply of traditional state felonies involving force or the risk of force any crime involving dealing in a controlled substance, regardless of the amount burglary 1
2 numerous federal offenses ranging from explosives and firearms offenses to identity fraud, stolen property offenses, and immigration offenses. If a person commits one of these gang crimes in order to further the activities of a criminal street gang, which need not be felonious or even criminal activities, or in order to gain entrance to or maintain or increase position in such a gang, which need not have a criminal purpose, s/he is subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of 10, 20 or 30 years and a maximum of life, or a minimum of life and a maximum of death. Where there truly is gang-related harm sufficient to justify federal intervention in traditional state crime matters or increased penalties for federal crimes, the RICO and CCE statutes are designed for that purpose and have been successfully used for that purpose for many years. See, e.g., Janice A. Petrella, Equal Protection--What Is In A Name? Sign? Symbol? Gang Members And Rico Considered, 34 Rutgers L.J (2003) ( there is a national trend in fighting gang-related crime using the RICO statutes, and these efforts have been very successful.... RICO may be used to target the managing forces of the gang, as well as its underlings. ); David R. Truman, The Jets And Sharks Are Dead: State Statutory Responses To Criminal Street Gangs, 73 Wash. U. L.Q. 683 (1995) ( Gangs were being prosecuted under RICO as early as the mid-1980s. By the early 1990s, the CCE statute was also being used against gangs that engaged in drug trafficking. ). Section 103(c) would permit a court at or after sentencing, upon motion of the Bureau of Prisons or a United States attorney, to order that a defendant convicted of certain racketeering, controlled substance, or criminal street gang offenses not associate or communicate with his attorney. The defendant s attorney currently is excepted from this possibility. See 18 U.S.C. 3582(d). We believe that such an order would violate the Sixth Amendment, and that, in some circumstances, the mere opportunity to move for such an order would lend itself to abuse. Section 112 of the legislation would change the definition of crime of violence in 18 U.S.C. 16(b) from an offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used, to any such offense if it is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, or that is a controlled substance offense under 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A), (B) or (C) involving no force or inherent risk of force. In addition to appearing in multiple existing statutes and thus extending their reach, the modified crime of violence is a predicate for a variety of new and revised offenses and penalties under Sections 101, 102, 104, 105 and 106 of the bill. Because some states punish misdemeanors for more than one year, this would create unwarranted disparity. For example, in both Alabama and Massachusetts, relatively minor offenses that arguably involve a risk of force, such as resisting arrest and assault, are classified as misdemeanors. In Alabama, a misdemeanor is punishable by no more than one year, see Ala.Code A-1-2(9), but in Massachusetts, misdemeanors are punishable by up to 2 ½ years. If committed in Massachusetts, this type of offense could be prosecuted 2
3 and punished under these various federal statutes, but not if committed in Alabama, though both states regard them as relatively minor. In addition, the use of the revised crime of violence as a predicate for new federal crimes and penalties would have grotesquely severe and irrational effects. As just one example, Section 106 would create the new offense of a crime of violence during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, with mandatory consecutive punishment in addition to that for the drug trafficking crime of life or death if the crime of violence results in death; at least 30 years if the crime of violence is kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse or maiming; at least 20 years for assault resulting in serious bodily injury; and otherwise at least 10 years and up to life. Resisting arrest, not punishable at all under federal law, during and in relation to possession or distribution of a small amount of marijuana, a misdemeanor subject to imprisonment for not more than one year, would be subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years. If the crime of violence were a drug trafficking crime, the offense under Section 106 would be a drug trafficking crime during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. A person otherwise subject to a sentence of no more than 20 years under 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(C) would be imprisoned for at least 10 years. A courier in a drug trafficking conspiracy involving a larger amount of drugs and thus subject to a mandatory minimum of 5 or 10 years under 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A) or (B), would instead receive a mandatory minimum of 15 or 20 years. The legislation creates twenty-four new mandatory minimums for new and revised offenses, 1 and raises three existing mandatory minimums. 2 It is undeniable by now that mandatory minimum statutes result in unwarranted disparity, including racial disparity, transfer sentencing power to prosecutors, and produce sentences that are unfair, disproportionate to the seriousness of the offense, and irrational. 3 We are aware of no complaint from the public that penalties for federal offenses are too low, or that the federal government should step in and pre-empt state law enforcement with ever increasing federal mandatory minimum sentences. The Federal and Community Defenders are particularly disturbed by this bill s creation of numerous new capital offenses when 119 innocent people have now been released from death row. As a result of this evidence, many states are placing moratoriums on the death penalty or seriously considering doing so. This legislation flies 1 See Sections 101 (criminal street gangs), 102 (travel in aid of racketeering), 103(a) (carjacking), 104 (murder for hire and other crimes of violence ), 105 (violent crimes in aid of racketeering), 106 (murder and other violent crimes during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime), 107 (multiple interstate murder), 114 (section 924(c)(1)(A)(iii). 2 See Sections 103(b) (section 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (ii)), 114 (section 924(h)). 3 See United States Sentencing Commission, Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System (August 1991); Federal Judicial Center, The Consequences of Mandatory Prison Terms (1994); Stephen J. Schulhofer, Rethinking Mandatory Minimums, 28 Wake Forest L. Rev. 199 (1993); Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, (2002) (Breyer, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). 3
4 in the face of the growing public consensus that capital punishment is wrong by attaching the death penalty to a variety of traditional state crimes, merely if death results. Six of the seven death-eligible offenses in this legislation have no necessary element of intent to kill or even reckless disregard for human life, and state of mind requirements were actually removed from the carjacking statute and the Travel Act. See Sections 101, 102, 103(a), 104, 105, 106. The seventh would criminalize traveling or use of the mails or other facility in interstate or foreign commerce with intent that 2 or more intentional homicides be committed, with no illegal act. See Section 107. This does not seem to comply with the Supreme Court s admonitions that the death penalty is disproportionate for all but the most severe offenses. Section 110 would change venue in capital cases from the county where the offense was committed, where that can be done without great inconvenience, see 18 U.S.C. 3235, to any district where activities which affect interstate or foreign commerce involved in the offense, or related conduct... occurred, regardless of where the offense was committed. This would permit the prosecution to forum shop for the venue most likely to produce conviction and a sentence of death, or the one most burdensome for the defendant. And it would allow the government to bring the death penalty to states whose citizens have rejected it, even if the offense was not committed there. The Constitution twice guarantees the right to trial in the State and district where the crime was committed. See U.S. Const. Art. III, 2, cl. 3; U.S. Const. Amend. VI. Thus, venue is constitutional only in the district where the acts constituting the charged offense were committed, not in any district where activities which affect interstate or foreign commerce involved in the offense, or related conduct... occurred. See United States v. Cabrales, 524 U.S. 1, 6-10 (1998) (venue for money laundering offenses was in the district where the money was laundered, not the district where the money was illegal produced); United States v. Salinas, 373 F.3d 161, (1 st Cir. 2004) (venue for passport fraud was in the district where the defendant made the knowingly false statement, not where the application was processed). Section 111 would add a new fifteen-year statute of limitations for any noncapital felony, crime of violence, including any racketeering activity or gang crime which involves any crime of violence. The most serious offenses in the criminal code are subject to a five-year statute of limitations. See 18 U.S.C Even terrorism offenses are subject only to an eight-year statute of limitations. See 18 U.S.C As discussed above, the proposed new definition of crime of violence consists of conduct that is not necessarily serious, or is no more serious than many other crimes in the code. There is no special reason to discard the important policies underlying the normal statutes of limitations to protect individuals from having to defend themselves against charges when the basic facts may have become obscured by the passage of time and to minimize the danger of official punishment because of acts in the far-distant past. Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112, (1970). Finally, Section 113 would amend Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(6) to permit a statement to be offered against a party when the declarant s unavailability was procured by wrongdoing if the party reasonably could foresee such wrongdoing would take place. 4
5 Currently, this exception applies only when the party engaged or acquiesced in the wrongdoing. It was adopted in 1997 in recognition of the need for a prophylactic rule to deal with abhorrent behavior which strikes at the heart of the system of justice itself. Fed. R. Evid. 804, advisory note (1997). A person who did not even acquiesce in the wrongdoing plainly did not engage in behavior that should be targeted by this exception. On behalf of the Federal Public and Community Defenders, I respectfully urge you to oppose this legislation. Very truly yours, Thomas W. Hiller II Federal Public Defender Chair, Legislative Expert Panel, Federal Public and Community Defenders cc: Members of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security of the House Judiciary Committee 5
6 FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Western District of Washington Thomas W. Hillier, II Federal Public Defender April 21, 2005 The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. Chairman Judiciary Committee United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C The Honorable John Conyers Ranking Member Judiciary Committee United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C Re: Gang Deterrence and Community Protection Act of 2005 (H.R. 1279) Dear Chairman Sensenbrenner and Representative Conyers: I wrote early last week on behalf of the Federal Public and Community Defenders to strongly urge the House Judiciary Committee s Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security to oppose H.R for a number of constitutional and policy reasons. I am writing now to alert you that this legislation seems to exceed Congress authority under the Commerce Clause by making federal crimes of a host of traditional state offenses that have no substantial effect on interstate commerce. In United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), the Supreme Court held that a statute making it a federal crime to possess a firearm within 1000 feet of a school exceeded Congress authority to regulate commerce, emphasizing that this was an area of traditional state concern and criminalized conduct already denounced as criminal by the States, and that neither the actors nor their conduct had a commercial character. Id. at 561 n.3, 567, , 580. In United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), the Supreme Court struck down the Violence Against Women Act, which provided a civil remedy in federal court for victims of gender-motivated violence. The Court made clear that the federal government does not have Commerce Clause jurisdiction over violent crime merely because it has an effect on the national economy. Id. at Otherwise, the 6
7 Commerce Clause could be used to completely obliterate the Constitution s distinction between national and local authority. Id. at 615. In Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848 (2000), the Court limited the reach of the federal arson statute, in part to avoid constitutional doubts under its commerce jurisprudence. The government argued that arson of a private home could be reached under the statute, as "property used in interstate or foreign commerce or in an[] activity affecting interstate or foreign commerce," because the home received out-of-state utilities, and was covered by an out-of-state mortgage and insurance policy. The Court rejected this argument, ruling that the "used in" language of the statute required active employment in interstate commerce, not mere passive receipt of interstate services. Id. at The Court added that if it adopted the government's theory, it would make virtually every arson in the country a federal offense. Id. at 859. The Court refused to read the statute to reach this "traditionally local criminal conduct." Id. at 858. H.R has substantial Commerce Clause problems under Lopez, Morrison and Jones. It prohibits "gang crimes" by "criminal street gangs." Gang crimes include any state crime of violence punishable by imprisonment of more than one year. This cannot be a basis for Commerce Clause jurisdiction, as Morrison makes clear. See 529 U.S. at "Criminal street gang" is defined to include any group of three or more who commit gang crimes, "if any of the activities of the criminal street gang affects interstate or foreign commerce." This seems to raise issues under Lopez and Jones. The activity is noncommercial (i.e., violent crime), and so is being prosecuted on the basis that the gang has some other connection to commerce. In such a circumstance, a gang's minimal connection to commerce would not suffice. Avoiding a constitutional problem would require that the criminal street gang itself be an economic enterprise, or at least that its activities "substantially" affect commerce. Otherwise, virtually all local activity that could be characterized as "gang activity" would be federalized, upsetting the federal-state balance in criminal prosecution. In Waucaush v. United States, 380 F.3d 251 (6th Cir. 2004), the Sixth Circuit followed similar reasoning to conclude that a gang prosecution under RICO exceeded Congress authority under the Commerce Clause where the putative gang s activities were intrastate, non-economic, and without substantial effect on interstate commerce. Id. at On behalf of the Federal Public and Community Defenders, I respectfully urge you to oppose this legislation for this additional reason. Very truly yours, 7
8 Thomas W. Hiller II Federal Public Defender Chair, Legislative Expert Panel, Federal Public and Community Defenders cc: Members of the House Judiciary Committee 8
Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C
Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 202-822-6700 www.famm.org Summary of The Gang Deterrence and Community Protection Act of 2005 Title I Criminal
More information18 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART II - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 227 - SENTENCES SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3559. Sentencing classification of offenses (a) Classification. An offense
More information4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014
4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014 PART B - CAREER OFFENDERS AND CRIMINAL LIVELIHOOD 4B1.1. Career Offender (a) (b) A defendant is a career offender if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years
More information(3) less than twenty-five years but ten or more years, as a Class C felony; (4) less than ten years but five or more years, as a Class D felony;
1 of 6 4/22/2008 9:13 AM Search Law School Search Cornell LII / Legal Information Institute U.S. Code collection TITLE 18 > PART II > CHAPTER 227 > SUBCHAPTER A > 3559 3559. Sentencing classification of
More informationAmendment to the Sentencing Guidelines
Amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines January 21, 2016 Effective Date August 1, 2016 This document contains unofficial text of an amendment to the Guidelines Manual submitted to Congress, and is provided
More informationOVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF STATE COURT CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. October 11, 2013
OVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF STATE COURT CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS October 11, 2013 By: Center for Public Policy Studies, Immigration and State Courts Strategic Initiative and National Immigrant
More informationWashington, D.C Washington, D.C
July 3, 2007 The Honorable Bobby Scott The Honorable Randy Forbes Chair Ranking Member Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security and Homeland Security U.S.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr JDW-AEP-1.
Case: 16-16403 Date Filed: 06/23/2017 Page: 1 of 7 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-16403 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00171-JDW-AEP-1
More informationSentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining
Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining Catherine P. Adkisson Assistant Solicitor General Colorado Attorney General s Office Although all classes of felonies have
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 16, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEREINO
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee
Case: 15-40264 Document: 00513225763 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/08/2015 No. 15-40264 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAYMOND ESTRADA,
More informationI. Potential Challenges Post-Johnson (Other Than Career Offender).
I. Potential Challenges Post-Johnson (Other Than Career Offender). A. Non-ACCA gun cases under U.S.S.G. 2K2.1. U.S.S.G. 2K2.1 imposes various enhancements for one or more prior crimes of violence. According
More informationTHE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017
THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017 https://youtu.be/d8cb5wk2t-8 CAREER OFFENDER. WE WILL DISCUSS GENERAL APPLICATION ( 4B1.1) CRIME OF VIOLENCE ( 4B1.2(a))
More informationNo. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. October Term 2013
No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term 2013 DANIEL RAUL ESPINOZA, PETITIONER V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationMARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER. DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO /11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6. Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation)
MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO 05-24 6/11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6 Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation) POLICY No person shall be contacted, detained, or arrested
More informationPC: , 457.1, 872, CVC: (C) TITLE 8: INMATE RELEASE I. PURPOSE:
STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT NUMBER: 2.05.11 RELATED ORDERS: PC: 1192.7, 457.1, 872, 667.5 ADULT DETENTION DIVISION CHAPTER 2: BOOKING, CLASSIFICATION, PROPERTY, & RELEASE INMATE RELEASE SUBJECT:
More informationCurrent Civil Detainer Policy. I am in complete opposition to the activities of ICE. Sincerely, Jean Staats. From: To: Subject: Date:
From: To: Subject: Date: BoardOperations Please Retain Current "Civil Detainer" Policy Monday, April 8, 2019 2:01:31 PM Dear Board of Supervisors, I am a Sunnyvale resident and have great respect for the
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
09-3389-cr United States v. Folkes UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2010 (Submitted: September 20, 2010; Decided: September 29, 2010) Docket No. 09-3389-cr UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-12626 Date Filed: 06/17/2016 Page: 1 of 9 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS IN RE: JOSEPH ROGERS, JR., FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-12626-J Petitioner. Application for Leave to
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cr-000-sab Document Filed 0/0/ 0 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN BRANNON SUTTLE III, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NO. :-cr-000-sab ORDER
More information2012 FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR BAIL SCHEDULE COUNTY OF IMPERIAL
2012 FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR BAIL SCHEDULE COUNTY OF IMPERIAL This schedule is adopted by the Superior Court for the County of Imperial pursuant to Section 1269b (c) of the Penal Code and is to be utilized
More informationAs Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No
132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No. 38 2017-2018 Representative Greenspan Cosponsors: Representatives Anielski, Barnes, Goodman, Keller, Kick, Lipps, Patton, Perales, Riedel, Retherford, Sprague,
More informationEvolution of the Definition of Aggravated Felony
Evolution of the Definition of Aggravated Felony By Norton Tooby & Joseph Justin Rollin The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (ADAA) first created a new category of deportable criminal offenses known as aggravated
More informationTo: Commission From: Uche Enwereuzor Re: No Early Release Act Date: September 10, 2012 MEMORANDUM
To: Commission From: Uche Enwereuzor Re: No Early Release Act Date: September 10, 2012 MEMORANDUM Commission Staff monitors case law in the State to identify decisions in which the court calls for Legislative
More informationWhen a State Felony is not A Federal Felony. Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder
When a State Felony is not A Federal Felony Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder Federal Felony Definition, generally: a conviction punishable by a term that exceeds one year imprisonment If the term exceeding
More informationMens Rea Reform Act of 2015 (S. 2298), and Criminal Code Improvement Act of 2015 (H.R. 4002)
COMMITTEE ON FEDERAL COURTS IRA M. FEINBERG CHAIR 875 THIRD AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10028 Phone: (212) 918-3509 Ira.feinberg@hoganlovells.com August 16, 2016 The Honorable Charles E. Grassley Chairman United
More informationVIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 691 An Act to amend and reenact 9.1-902, 17.1-805, 18.2-46.1, 18.2-356, 18.2-357, 18.2-513, 19.2-215.1, and 19.2-386.35 of the Code of Virginia and to
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ANTHONY M. BUCCO District 25 (Morris and Somerset)
ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY, 0 Sponsored by: Assemblyman ANTHONY M. BUCCO District (Morris and Somerset) Co-Sponsored by: Assemblymen Space and Harold J. Wirths
More informationCHAPTER Senate Bill No. 808
CHAPTER 2010-121 Senate Bill No. 808 An act relating to murder; amending s. 782.04, F.S.; providing that murder in the first degree includes the unlawful killing of a human being which resulted from the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr WTM-GRS-1
Case: 17-10473 Date Filed: 04/04/2019 Page: 1 of 14 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17-10473 D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr-00154-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 113
CHAPTER 99-12 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 113 An act relating to punishment of felons; amending s. 775.087, F.S., relating to felony reclassification and minimum sentence
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case Number BC v. Honorable David M.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Case Number 03-20028-BC v. Honorable David M. Lawson DERRICK GIBSON, Defendant. / OPINION
More informationCRIMINAL OFFENCES. Chapter 9
CRIMINAL OFFENCES Chapter 9 LEVELS OF OFFENCES In the Canadian legal system we have three levels of criminal offences. Summary Conviction Offences Indictable Offences Hybrid Offences LEVELS OF OFFENCES:
More informationNO MORE SIMPLE BATTERY IN WEST VIRGINIA: THE NEWLY AMENDED AND Katherine Moore*
21 WEST VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ONLINE [Vol. 1 NO MORE SIMPLE BATTERY IN WEST VIRGINIA: THE NEWLY AMENDED 61-2-9 AND 61-2-28 Katherine Moore* I. INTRODUCTION... 21 II. UNITED STATES V. WHITE... 21 A. The Fourth
More informationSelect Florida Mandatory Minimum Laws
Select Florida Laws IMPORTANT NOTE: This is not necessarily a complete list. Laws frequently change, and these sentences may no longer be accurate or up to date. Talk with a lawyer in your state if you
More information) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY
Case 2:03-cr-00836-JAP Document 86 Filed 06/16/2006 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CRIMINAL NO. 03-836 (JAP) ) v. ) GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE
More informationBusiness Law Chapter 9 Handout
Major Differences: 2 Felonies Serious crimes, punishable by Death or prison for more than one (1) year. Misdemeanors Non-serious (petty) crimes punishable by jail for less than one(1) year and/or by fines.
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 163
CHAPTER 2002-159 Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 163 An act relating to sexual offenses; amending s. 825.1025, F.S.; providing for the crime of lewd or lascivious offenses committed upon or in
More informationMICHIGAN OFFENSES WHICH ARE OR ARE NOT CRIMES OF VIOLENCE (AS OF AUGUST 14, 2018) SIXTH CIRCUIT AND EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN CASES PAGE 1
AND EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN CASES PAGE 1 Johnson v United States, 135 SCt 2551 (2015) changed the landscape as to what is a crime of violence under ACCA (for felon in possession cases) and under USSG
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
Shelton v. USA Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA MICHAEL J. SHELTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. No.: 1:18-CV-287-CLC MEMORANDUM
More informationOrganized Crime And Racketeering
U.S. Attorneys» U.S. Attorneys' Manual» Title 9: Criminal 9 110.000 Organized Crime And Racketeering 9 110.010 Introduction 9 110.100 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) 9 110.101 Division
More informationSession of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Judiciary 2-1
Session of 0 SENATE BILL No. By Committee on Judiciary - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure; relating to criminal discharge of a firearm; sentencing; amending K.S.A. 0 Supp.
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS APPELLEE
Case: 13-10650, 08/17/2015, ID: 9649625, DktEntry: 42, Page 1 of 19 No. 13-10650 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GERRIELL ELLIOTT TALMORE, Defendant-Appellant.
More informationFor the purposes of this article, the following terms have the following meanings:
Ala.Code 1975 12-25-32 Code of Alabama Currentness Title 12. Courts. (Refs & Annos) Chapter 25. Alabama Sentencing Commission. (Refs & Annos) Article 2.. Alabama Sentencing Reform Act of 2003. (Refs &
More informationWRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION BEFORE THE ANTITRUST MODERNIZATION COMMISSION
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION BEFORE THE ANTITRUST MODERNIZATION COMMISSION Hearing on Consideration of Antitrust Criminal Remedies November 3, 2005 Madam Chair, Commissioners,
More informationCase 3:16-cv ADC Document 6 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Case 3:16-cv-02368-ADC Document 6 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO FERNANDO BAELLA-PABÓN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil No. 16-2368
More informationFederal Sentencing Guidelines FJC Court Web Alan Dorhoffer Deputy Director, Office of Education
Federal Sentencing Guidelines FJC Court Web Alan Dorhoffer Deputy Director, Office of Education Johnson v. U.S., 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) 2 The Armed Career Criminal Act s residual clause is unconstitutionally
More information(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;
18 U.S.C. 3553 : Imposition of a sentence (a) Factors To Be Considered in Imposing a Sentence. - The court shall impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes
More informationSCHEDULE OF LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES COMMENT ON SCHEDULE OF LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES
SCHEDULE OF LESSER INCLUDED COMMENT ON SCHEDULE OF LESSER INCLUDED One of the difficult problems in instructing a criminal jury is to make certain that it is properly charged with respect to the degrees
More informationImmigration Violations
Policy 428 428.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE - CONFORMANCE TO SB54 AND RELATED LAWS The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines with the California Values Act, and related statutes, concerning responsibilities
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES Where to find the Guidelines ONLINE at www.ussc.gov/guidelines In print from Westlaw Chapter Organization Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Offense Conduct Chapter
More informationFEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation
FEDERAL STATUTES The following is a list of federal statutes that the community of targeted individuals feels are being violated by various factions of group stalkers across the United States. This criminal
More informationNEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE
NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER 69 Effective Date 01/01/2018 SUBJECT PURPOSE POLICY COOPERATION WITH IMMIGRATION AUTHORITIES AND U VISA The purpose of this order is to provide employees with
More informationSENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE
LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2007 SUMMARY Synopsis: Type of Impact: Eliminates the death
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 228
CHAPTER 2016-7 Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 228 An act relating to the mandatory minimum sentences; amending s. 775.087, F.S.; deleting aggravated assault from the list of convictions which
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. OCTOBER TERM, 2015 LEVON DEAN, JR., Petitioner. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2015 LEVON DEAN, JR., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationCase 3:13-cr KI Document 51 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 141
Case 3:13-cr-00271-KI Document 51 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 141 S. AMANDA MARSHALL, OSB #95347 United States Attorney District of Oregon JANE SHOEMAKER Assistant United States Attorney Jane.Shoemaker@usdoj.gov
More informationH.R. 1924, THE TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT OF 2009
STATEMENT OF THOMAS J. PERRELLI ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE OF CRIME, TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ENTITLED H.R. 1924, THE TRIBAL LAW AND
More informationObstruction of Justice: An Abridged Overview of Related Federal Criminal Laws
Obstruction of Justice: An Abridged Overview of Related Federal Criminal Laws Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law April 17, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22783
More informationImmigrants Rights Organizations Encourage Members of Congress to Vote No on H.R. 6691, a Retrogressive Mass Incarceration Bill September 5, 2018
Immigrants Rights Organizations Encourage Members of Congress to Vote No on H.R. 6691, a Retrogressive Mass Incarceration Bill September 5, 2018 H.R. 6691 is a retrogressive measure that seeks to expand
More informationI. NON-LPR CANCELLATION (UNDOCUMENTED)
BRIAN PATRICK CONRY OSB #82224 534 SW THIRD AVE. SUITE 711 PORTLAND, OR 97204 TEL: 503-274-4430 FAX: 503-274-0414 bpconry@gmail.com Immigration Consequences of Criminal Convictions November 5, 2010 I.
More information80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1007 SUMMARY
Sponsored by COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY 0th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session Senate Bill 00 SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the
More informationBail Reform in NJ HOW WILL IT AFFECT FOREIGN NATIONALS? NO ONE REALLY KNOWS HOW IT WILL AFFECT ANYONE YET!
Bail Reform in NJ HOW WILL IT AFFECT FOREIGN NATIONALS? NO ONE REALLY KNOWS HOW IT WILL AFFECT ANYONE YET! Bail Reform s Objective New Rules NJSA 2A:162-15 Shift Resource-based system (money bail $) to
More informationUSA v. Edward McLaughlin
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-25-2016 USA v. Edward McLaughlin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationCOLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE Title: Limited Access Programs Admission: Criminal Background Restrictions Page 1 of 4 Implementing Procedure for Policy #: 7.00 Date Approved: 8/16/06
More informationMANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
An Overview of MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES in the FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM United States Sentencing Commission July 2017 Overview of Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice
More informationTABLE B SELECTED CRIME OF VIOLENCE DEFINITIONS (and related lists of serious crimes) Prepared by Joe Cox, House Research March 15, 2002
TABLE B SELECTED CRIME OF VIOLENCE DEFINITIONS (and related lists of serious crimes Prepared b Joe Cox, House Research March 15, 2002 CRIMES SECTION CONTAINING DEFINITION OR LIST conspirac 7 analsis 152
More informationColorado Legislative Council Staff
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Distributed to CCJJ, November 9, 2017 Room 029 State Capitol, Denver, CO 80203-1784 (303) 866-3521 FAX: 866-3855 TDD: 866-3472 leg.colorado.gov/lcs E-mail: lcs.ga@state.co.us
More informationEffective October 1, 2015
Modification to the Sentencing Standards. Adopted by the Alabama Sentencing Commission January 9, 2015. Effective October 1, 2015 A 3 Appendix A A 4 I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS - Introduction The Sentencing
More informationFact Sheet PENALTIES FOR CATEGORY B FELONIES UNDER NEVADA REVISED STATUTES (NRS) CATEGORY B FELONIES
Fact Sheet PENALTIES FOR CATEGORY B FELONIES UNDER NEVADA REVISED STATUTES (NRS) RESEARCH DIVISION REVISED FEBRUARY 2018 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU CATEGORY B FELONIES the maximum term of imprisonment
More informationJurisdiction Profile: Alabama
1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION Q. What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The Alabama Legislature
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 667
CHAPTER 2012-21 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 667 An act relating to murder; providing a short title; amending s. 782.04, F.S.; providing that the unlawful killing of
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: February 26, 2018 Decided: January 4, 2019 ) Docket No.
--cr Shabazz v. United States of America 0 0 0 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 0 (Argued: February, 0 Decided: January, 0 ) Docket No. AL MALIK FRUITKWAN SHABAZZ, fka
More informationBUSINESS LAW Chapter 3 PowerPoint Notes & Assignment Criminal Law
BUSINESS LAW Chapter 3 PowerPoint Notes & Assignment Criminal Law SECTION 3.1 - WHAT IS A CRIME? Classifications of Crimes ** is considered an act against the public good The ** is the person accused of
More informationInformation Memorandum 98-11*
Wisconsin Legislative Council Staff June 24, 1998 Information Memorandum 98-11* NEW LAW RELATING TO TRUTH IN SENTENCING: SENTENCE STRUCTURE FOR FELONY OFFENSES, EXTENDED SUPERVISION, CRIMINAL PENALTIES
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: April 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016)
-1-cr; 1--cr United States v. Boykin 1-1-cr; 1--cr United States v. Boykin 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 01 (Argued: April, 01 Decided: August
More informationMISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018 By: Representative DeLano To: Corrections HOUSE BILL NO. 232 1 AN ACT TO REQUIRE THAT AN INMATE BE GIVEN NOTIFICATION OF 2 CERTAIN TERMS UPON HIS OR HER RELEASE
More informationMatter of Martin CHAIREZ-Castrejon, Respondent
Matter of Martin CHAIREZ-Castrejon, Respondent Decided September 28, 2016 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The respondent s removability as
More informationMISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017 By: Representative DeLano To: Corrections HOUSE BILL NO. 35 1 AN ACT TO REQUIRE THAT AN INMATE BE GIVEN NOTIFICATION OF 2 CERTAIN TERMS UPON HIS OR HER RELEASE
More informationDONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, Defendant. CRIMINAL NO. 07-1244 WJ NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK A SENTENCE OF
More informationPursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C (a) and. that it believes that the circumstances of this case are such
KTC : MJF F. # 2005R01101 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - against - GERARD PRICE, also known as "Crime" and "Bloody Crime, " NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK
More informationSENATE SPONSORSHIP. Bill Summary
Second Regular Session Sixty-fourth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO. 0-0.01 Beth Braby HOUSE BILL 0- HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
More information~3n ~e ~reme ~ourt of ~e ~Inite~ ~tate~
No. 06-1646 ~3n ~e ~reme ~ourt of ~e ~Inite~ ~tate~ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER V. GINO GONZAGA RODRIQUEZ ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH
More informationCase 1:13-cr MC Document 59 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION ORDER
Case 1:13-cr-00325-MC Document 59 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, No. 1:13-cr-00325-MC
More informationNO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, Trevon Sykes - Petitioner. vs. United State of America - Respondent.
NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 2017 Trevon Sykes - Petitioner vs. United State of America - Respondent. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Levell D. Littleton Attorney for Petitioner 1221
More informationIs it Automatic?: The Mens Rea Presumption and the Interpretation of the Machinegun Provision of 18 U.S.C. 924(c) in United States v.
Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice Volume 34 Issue 3 Electronic Supplement Article 5 March 2014 Is it Automatic?: The Mens Rea Presumption and the Interpretation of the Machinegun Provision
More informationDecember 13, The Honorable Byron L. Dorgan Chairman Committee on Indian Affairs United States Senate
United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 December 13, 2010 The Honorable Byron L. Dorgan Chairman Committee on Indian Affairs United States Senate The Honorable John Barrasso
More informationCHANGES: An Arrest is taking a person into custody, in a case and in the manner authorized by law. (Penal Code 834.)
ISSUE DATE: September 28, 2017 SERVICE: ACADEMIC CLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED REPLACES: Legacy Personnel Guides: C324 C325 C326 C327 CHANGES: New I. POLICY The District is committed to prioritizing the safety
More informationRECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATURE OF ALASKA FROM THE ALASKA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATURE OF ALASKA FROM THE ALASKA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION Recommendation 19-2017, adopted October 12, 2017: Enact Vehicular Homicide and Related Statutes The Alaska Criminal
More informationCHAPTER Senate Bill No. 1768
CHAPTER 2004-286 Senate Bill No. 1768 An act relating to possession of ammunition by felons and delinquents; amending s. 790.001, F.S.; providing a definition of the term ammunition ; amending s. 790.23,
More information1. Do you support the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act?
1. Do you support the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act? I continue to support due process rights for all individuals, groups, and organizations. Collective bargaining rights should be left
More informationCHAPTER House Bill No. 1845
CHAPTER 2001-233 House Bill No. 1845 An act relating to the criminal use of personal information; amending s. 817.568, F.S.; providing that the willful and fraudulent use of personal identification information
More informationTO: All Article 19-A Motor Carriers and Certified Examiners. SUBJECT: Chapter 189 of the Laws of New Disqualification for School Bus Drivers
Albany, New York January 7, 2019 TO: All Article 19-A Motor Carriers and Certified Examiners SUBJECT: Chapter 189 of the Laws of 2018 - New Disqualification for School Bus Drivers A new law took effect
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT YORK, PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT YORK, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE MATTER OF: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS RESPONDENT S OPPOSITION TO AGGRAVATED
More informationTHIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY EMPLOYEES OF A FEDERAL DEFENDER OFFICE AS PART OF THEIR OFFICIAL DUTIES.
Would an Enhancement for Accidental Death or Serious Bodily Injury Resulting from the Use of a Drug No Longer Apply Under the Supreme Court s Decision in Burrage v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 881 (2014),
More informationHOUSE AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 737
Senate CHAMBER ACTION 1.... House 2.. 3.. 4 5 ORIGINAL STAMP BELOW 6 7 8 9 10 11 The Council for Healthy Communities offered the following: 12 13 Substitute Amendment for Amendment (155961) (with title
More informationCODIFICATION OF PUBLIC LAWS OF 2002
Title 2A 2A:156A-8 26 6/18/02 Amends N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-8 to add violations of the September 11th, 2001 Anti- Terrorism Act and of N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3, 2C:33-3, 2C:17-2 and 2C:17-7 through 2C:17-9 to the list
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
Appellate Case: 13-1466 Document: 01019479219 Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 1 No. 13-1466 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, RANDY
More informationSummary: First Step Act, S. 756 (115th Congress, 2018)
Summary: First Step Act, S. 756 (115th Congress, 2018) FAMM s position on the First Step Act: FAMM supports the First Step Act. While the bill is not perfect, it will bring much-needed reform to federal
More information2013 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALABAMA
2013 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALABAMA FRAMEWORK ISSUE 1: CRIMINALIZATION OF DOMESTIC MINOR SEX TRAFFICKING Legal Components: 1.1 The state human trafficking law addresses sex trafficking and clearly
More information