No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
|
|
- Leonard Hunt
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 1 No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, RANDY GOODWIN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO The Honorable Marcia S. Krieger, Chief Judge D.C. No. 12-cr-100-MSK JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney JAMES C. MURPHY Assistant U.S. Attorney th Street, Suite 700 Denver, CO (303) Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America August 21, 2015
2 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... II SNYPOSIS... 1 ISSUE... 1 CASE STATEMENT... 1 ARGUMENT... 2 MR. GOODWIN SHOULD BE RESENTENCED... 2 A. The Issue Below... 3 B. Standard of Review... 4 C. The Residual Clause of the Sentencing Guidelines Is Unconstitutionally Vague; Mr. Goodwin s Prior Conviction Is Not Otherwise A Crime of Violence Under USSG 4B D. Mr. Goodwin s Case Should Be Remanded For Resentencing... 9 CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF DIGITAL SUBMISSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i
3 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES ii Page No. Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314 (1987)...3 Henderson v. United States, 133 S. Ct (2013)... 3, 4 Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct (June 26, 2015)... 1, 2, 3 Peugh v. United States, 133 S. Ct (2013)...9 Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990)...6 United States v. Armijo, 651 F.3d 1226 (10thCir.2011)... 6, 8 United States v. Charles, 576 F.3d 1060 (10th Cir.2009)...8 United States v. Darden, 605 Fed.Appx. 545 (6th Cir.2015)(unpublished)...9 United States v. Dennis, 551 F.3d 986 (10th Cir.2008)...8 United States v. Dewberry, 790 F.3d 1022 (10th Cir. 2015) United States v. Harbin, Fed.Appx., 2015 WL (6th Cir.2015) (unpublished)...9 United States v. Huizar, 688 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir.2012)... 6, 7, 9
4 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 4 United States v. Kelly, 1 F.3d 1137 (10th Cir.1993)...8 United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (1993)...4 United States v. Rivera-Oros, 590 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir.2009)... 7, 8 United States v. Snyder, F.3d, 2015 WL (10th Cir. July 20, 2015)...9 United States v. Thomas, 643 F.3d 802 (10th Cir.2011)...8 United States v. Tichenor, 683 F.3d 358 (7th Cir. 2012)...8 United States v. Todd, 515 F.3d 1128 (10th Cir.2008)...9 United States v. Venegas-Ornelas, 348 F.3d 1273 (10th Cir.2003)... 3, 6 United States v. Williams, 559 F.3d 1143 (10th Cir.2009)...8 FEDERAL STATUTES, RULES & GUIDELINES 18 U.S.C. 16(b) U.S.C. 922(g)(1) U.S.C. 924(e) U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B) U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B)(ii)...2 iii
5 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 5 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(C)...1 Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b)...4 USSG 2K2.1(a)(4) USSG 2K2.1(a)(4)(A)... 2, 3 USSG 2K2.1(a)(6) USSG 4B , 8, 9 USSG 4B1.2(a)...5 USSG 4B1.2(a)(2)... 6, 7, 9 USSG 5K USSG 5K STATE STATUTES Colo.Rev.Stat.Ann , 5, 6 iv
6 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 6 SNYPOSIS In Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct (June 26, 2015), the Supreme Court held that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 [ACCA] is unconstitutionally vague. Mr. Goodwin s sentence was enhanced below based upon a prior conviction which the government had maintained was a crime of violence under the residual clause of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Guidelines residual clause is identical to that of the ACCA. And in past cases, this court has consistently applied ACCA analysis to the Guidelines. The United States thus concedes that the reasoning of Johnson requires that Mr. Goodwin s sentence be vacated. Because findings will need to be made regarding the correct sentencing range, the case should be remanded for resentencing. ISSUE Whether Johnson v. United States requires that Mr. Goodwin be resentenced. CASE STATEMENT Mr. Goodwin entered guilty pleas, in the District of Colorado, to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), and to distribution of less than 5 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(c). Vol. 1 at 56. His sentence was increased, over his objection, when the district court found he had a prior felony conviction 1
7 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 7 for a crime of violence: First Degree Criminal Trespass, in violation of C.R.S See Vol. 4 at 72; USSG 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). The district court sentenced Mr. Goodwin to concurrent terms of 99 months imprisonment on each count. Vol. 4 at 75. Mr. Goodwin appealed, claiming that his prior conviction should not have been deemed a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines. This court heard argument on September 30, On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Johnson v. United States, holding that the residual clause of the of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 [ACCA] is unconstitutionally vague. This court has ordered supplemental briefing on the impact, if any, of Johnson on Mr. Goodwin s appeal. ARGUMENT MR. GOODWIN SHOULD BE RESENTENCED In Johnson, the Court examined 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). This portion of the ACCA contains enumerated offenses which Congress defines as violent felonies. What follows is the residual clause, which includes within the definition of a violent felony any crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another Overruling its prior 1 An offense may still qualify as a violent felony under 924(e)(2)(B) if the offense is enumerated or contains an element of physical force used, 2
8 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 8 case law, the Court held that two features of the residual clause render it unconstitutionally vague. First, the residual clause requires judges to assess risk based upon an imagined ordinary case of the offense in question, rather than upon real-world facts or statutory elements. 135 S.Ct. at Second, the residual clause leaves too much uncertainty surrounding the degree of risk an offense must pose to qualify as a violent felony. Id. at Johnson applies to cases pending on direct appeal at the time of the decision. See Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 (1987); Henderson v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 1121, 1126 (2013). A. The Issue Below Mr. Goodwin s sentence was not enhanced under the ACCA, but under the Sentencing Guidelines, on the ground that he committed any part of the instant offense subsequent to sustaining one felony conviction of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense.... See USSG 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). Following the recommendation of the presentence report, vol. 3 at 42, the district court concluded that Mr. Goodwin s prior conviction for residential criminal trespass was a crime of violence. Vol. 4 at 72. The district court relied in part upon this court s decision in United States v. Venegas- Ornelas, 348 F.3d 1273 (10th Cir.2003), where the court held this offense to attempted, or threatened, against the person of another. Johnson does not affect these provisions of the statute. 135 S.Ct. at
9 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 9 be a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 16(b). 2 The briefing in this appeal has heretofore focused upon whether the offense in question is also a crime of violence under the Guidelines. B. Standard of Review Although Mr. Goodwin argued below that his criminal trespass conviction was not a crime of violence, vol. 4 at 64, he did not argue that the Guidelines residual clause was unconstitutionally vague. Hence, review is for plain error. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b). Plain error review requires a defendant to show: (1) an error, (2) that is plain (at the time of review), and (3) that affects a defendant s substantial rights. If these elements are satisfied, this court has discretion to correct the error if failure to do so would seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, (1993). Even when, as here, a new rule of law is issued while a case is pending on appeal, Rule 52(b) does not give a court of appeals authority to overlook a failure to object unless an error affects the defendant s substantial rights and also seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the judicial proceedings. Henderson v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 1121, 1126 (2013). 2 The language of 16(b) differs from the residual clauses of the ACCA and USSG, and the United States maintains that Johnson s holding has no direct application to 16(b). But that issue is not before this court. 4
10 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 10 The United States concedes, in light of Johnson, that Mr. Goodwin s criminal trespass conviction may no longer be deemed a crime of violence, i.e., that there is error and that the error is plain. Given the manner in which the sentence was computed, the United States also concedes that this error affected Mr. Goodwin s substantial rights and that failure to correct the error would seriously affect the fairness of these proceedings. C. The Residual Clause of the Sentencing Guidelines Is Unconstitutionally Vague; Mr. Goodwin s Prior Conviction Is Not Otherwise A Crime of Violence Under USSG 4B1.2. Section 2K2.1, Application note 1, provides that the term crime of violence has the meaning given it at USSG 4B1.2(a). Section 4B1.2 states: (a) The term crime of violence means any offense under federal or state law, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that (1) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or (2) is burglary of a dwelling, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. Mr. Goodwin s prior conviction is for first degree criminal trespass, under Colo.Rev.Stat.Ann , which provides: A person commits the crime of first degree criminal trespass if such person knowingly and unlawfully enters or remains in a dwelling of another or if such person enters any motor vehicle with intent to commit a crime therein. First degree criminal trespass is a class 5 felony. 5
11 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 11 Examining the statute in Venegas-Ornelas, this court observed: Because this statute reaches two different types of conduct by governing both entry or remaining in an automobile and entry or remaining in a dwelling, we can look to Defendant s charging papers to discern which section he was convicted under. Id. at See also United States v. Huizar, 688 F.3d 1193, 1194 (10th Cir.2012) (applying modified categorical approach in attempting to determine if defendant was convicted of burglary of a dwelling); United States v. Armijo, 651 F.3d 1226, 1230 (10thCir.2011) (applying modified categorical approach to determine if predicate felony was a crime of violence under Guidelines). Below, Mr. Goodwin plead guilty to an Information that charged he did unlawfully, feloniously and knowingly enter and remain in the dwelling of [name and address omitted]. See vol. 3 at 76, 86. The question then becomes whether this offense is a crime of violence. The statute in question does not contain an element involving the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another. Hence, if the offense is to be deemed a crime of violence it must fall under the enumerated offenses or the residual clause of 4B1.2(a)(2). As to enumerated offenses, the only candidate here is burglary of a dwelling. In Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990), the Court found that labels imposed by the states are not controlling, and that generic 6
12 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 12 burglary, for purposes of a sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C. 924(e), requires the basic elements of unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in, a building or structure, with intent to commit a crime. Id. at 599 (emphasis added). Applying Taylor to sentence enhancements under the Guidelines, this court has acknowledged Taylor s definition and has further held that burglary of a dwelling includes burglary of any enclosed space that is used or intended for use as a human habitation. United States v. Rivera- Oros, 590 F.3d 1123, 1127, 1132 (10th Cir.2009). Mr. Goodwin s plea shows his offense was indeed committed in the dwelling of another. The plea papers also show that he knowingly and unlawfully entered and remained in that dwelling. However the statute does not require that an offender enter or remain in a dwelling with intent to commit a crime. Hence, the criminal trespass statute under consideration is not generic burglary as defined by the Supreme Court, and correspondingly, is not burglary of a dwelling under USSG 4B1.2(a)(2). See also United States v. Huizar, 688 F.3d at 1194 (considering Taylor s applicability to guideline enhancement for burglary of a dwelling). Hence, Mr. Goodwin s criminal trespass conviction may be classed as a crime of violence only if the Guidelines residual clause survives scrutiny. The United States maintains it does not. The language of the Guideline s residual clause is identical to ACCA s residual clause. And in numerous cases, this 7
13 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 13 court has observed that 4B1.2 is patterned after 924(e)(2)(B). See, e.g., United States v. Rivera-Oros, 590 F.3d at 1129; United States v. Armijo, 651 F.3d at 1231 n.3. 3 Understandably, this court has further concluded that the Supreme Court s analysis under the ACCA applies equally to the Sentencing Guidelines. See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 643 F.3d 802, 805 (10th Cir.2011); United States v. Charles, 576 F.3d 1060, 1068 n. 2 (10th Cir.2009); United States v. Williams, 559 F.3d 1143, 1147 n. 7 (10th Cir.2009); United States v. Dennis, 551 F.3d 986, (10th Cir.2008). These holdings suggest that Johnson s reasoning also applies equally to the Guidelines. Given the identical language, the Guidelines residual clause necessarily suffers the same short-comings as the ACCA s residual clause in failing to provide adequate guidance to judges in assessing the risks posed by prior convictions. Although a few courts have held that advisory sentencing guidelines are not subject to constitutional vagueness challenges, see, e.g., United States v. Tichenor, 683 F.3d 358, 362 (7th Cir. 2012), this court is not one of them. Cf. United States v. Kelly, 1 F.3d 1137, (10th Cir.1993) (considering and rejecting vagueness challenge, pre-booker, to USSG 5K2.8). In any event, the reasoning of cases such as Tichenor appears to be at 3 As already discussed, the one exception, acknowledged by the court in Rivera-Oros, is ACCA s enumerated offense of burglary. In the Guidelines, the offense is stated as burglary of a dwelling. 8
14 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 14 odds with both Johnson and Peugh v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 2072, 2083 (2013) (Ex Post Facto Clause applies to advisory sentencing guidelines). Although this court has not yet considered Johnson s application to the Guidelines, the court recently acknowledged Johnson in United States v. Snyder, -- F.3d --, 2015 WL (10th Cir. July 20, 2015), where the court vacated a sentence imposed under the ACCA s residual clause and remanded for resentencing. The Sixth Circuit, in two per curiam orders, has held that Johnson applies to sentences imposed under USSG 4B1.2, and has vacated the sentences and remanded for reconsideration. United States v. Darden, 605 Fed.Appx. 545 (6th Cir.2015)(unpublished); United States v. Harbin, Fed.Appx., 2015 WL (6th Cir.2015) (unpublished). The United States thus concedes that the residual clause of the Sentencing Guidelines, contained at 4B1.2(a)(2), is unconstitutionally vague and may not serve as a basis for enhancing Mr. Goodwin s sentence. D. Mr. Goodwin s Case Should Be Remanded For Resentencing When an error exists in imposing sentence, remand is necessary unless this court determines the error did not affect the sentence imposed, or it is clear what sentence the court would impose on remand. United States v. Huizar, 688 F.3d at 1197; United States v. Todd, 515 F.3d 1128, (10th Cir.2008). The United States concedes that remand is necessary. 9
15 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 15 Mr. Goodwin was convicted of two counts and sentenced to 99 months imprisonment on each count, imposed to run concurrently. Vol. 4 at 75. The prior conviction for criminal trespass apparently added 6 points to the base offense level. Cf. USSG 2K2.1(a)(4) & (a)(6);vol. 3 at 42. With the conviction, the sentencing court found the total offense level to be 25, the criminal history category to be VI, and the advisory imprisonment range to be months. 4 The district court did not find what the offense level would have been without the prior conviction, but it appears that the total offense level would be 19, which in criminal history category VI, yields an advisory imprisonment range of months. The sentence imposed below also reflects a departure below the advisory range: the district court s discretionary grant of a government motion under USSG 5K1.1. In some cases, the imposition of a concurrent sentence, which is unaffected by the sentencing error, may avoid the need for remand. See, e.g., United States v. Dewberry, 790 F.3d 1022, (10th Cir. 2015) (discussing but declining to apply concurrent-sentence doctrine). That is not the case here. The two counts of conviction formed a single group for sentencing, see vol. 3 at 42, 16, and the sentencing range found by the court below for each count was affected by the error. See vol. 4 at Without 4 As to count 1, the advisory range was limited by the statutory maximum to months. 10
16 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 16 the prior conviction, the sentencing range for count two would also likely be months imprisonment. Ultimately, these matters can be determined only by additional findings, which need to be made in the first instance by the sentencing court. CONCLUSION Mr. Goodwin s case should be remanded for resentencing. Respectfully Submitted, John F. Walsh United States Attorney s/ James C. Murphy James C. Murphy Assistant U.S. Attorney th Street, Suite 700 Denver, Colorado (303) USACO.ECFAppellate@usdoj.gov; James.Murphy3@usdoj.gov 11
17 Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 17 CERTIFICATE OF DIGITAL SUBMISSION I hereby certify that with respect to the foregoing: (1) all required privacy redactions have been made; (2) if required to file additional hard copies, that the ECF submission is an exact copy of those documents; (3) The digital submissions have been scanned for viruses with the most recent version of a commercial virus scanning program, TREND MICRO Office Scan for Windows, Version , Engine Version , Virus Pattern File , dated 8/20/15, and according to the program are free of viruses. I certify that the information on this form is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief formed after a reasonable inquiry. s/ Ma-Linda La-Follette Ma-Linda La-Follette U.S. Attorney s Office CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 21, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following address: Robert Seldis Berger robberger@qwestoffice.net s/ Ma-Linda La-Follette Ma-Linda La-Follette U.S. Attorney s Office 12
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Case: 14-6294 Document: 22 Filed: 08/20/2015 Page: 1 No. 14-6294 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, ANTHONY GRAYER, Defendant-Appellant.
More informationTENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Randy Goodwin was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 4, 2015 Plaintiff - Appellee, TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v.
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS APPELLEE
Case: 13-10650, 08/17/2015, ID: 9649625, DktEntry: 42, Page 1 of 19 No. 13-10650 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GERRIELL ELLIOTT TALMORE, Defendant-Appellant.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT NO Plaintiff/ Appellee, Defendant/ Appellant.
Appellate Case: 14-2159 Document: 01019478724 Date Filed: 08/20/2015 Page: 1 Case: 14-10396 Date Filed: 09/02/2015 Page: 31 of 72 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT NO. 14-2159 UNITED STATES
More informationCase 1:13-cr MC Document 59 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION ORDER
Case 1:13-cr-00325-MC Document 59 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, No. 1:13-cr-00325-MC
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee
Case: 15-40264 Document: 00513225763 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/08/2015 No. 15-40264 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAYMOND ESTRADA,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case Number BC v. Honorable David M.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Case Number 03-20028-BC v. Honorable David M. Lawson DERRICK GIBSON, Defendant. / OPINION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
Shelton v. USA Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA MICHAEL J. SHELTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. No.: 1:18-CV-287-CLC MEMORANDUM
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 16, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEREINO
More informationAmendment to the Sentencing Guidelines
Amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines January 21, 2016 Effective Date August 1, 2016 This document contains unofficial text of an amendment to the Guidelines Manual submitted to Congress, and is provided
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cr-000-sab Document Filed 0/0/ 0 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN BRANNON SUTTLE III, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NO. :-cr-000-sab ORDER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr JDW-AEP-1.
Case: 16-16403 Date Filed: 06/23/2017 Page: 1 of 7 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-16403 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00171-JDW-AEP-1
More informationNO: INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2014 DANAE. TUOMI, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
NO: 15-5756 INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2014 DANAE. TUOMI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr WTM-GRS-1
Case: 17-10473 Date Filed: 04/04/2019 Page: 1 of 14 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17-10473 D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr-00154-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 12-40877 Document: 00512661408 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
09-3389-cr United States v. Folkes UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2010 (Submitted: September 20, 2010; Decided: September 29, 2010) Docket No. 09-3389-cr UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C INTRODUCTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF [JOHN DOE], Movant, Civil No. v. Crim. No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 INTRODUCTION Petitioner,
More informationArmed Career Criminal and Career Offender Enhancements. If you can t avoid them, deflect them.
Armed Career Criminal and Career Offender Enhancements If you can t avoid them, deflect them. ACCA - mandatory 15 year sentence: Who does it apply to? Defendant must: be adjudicated guilty under 18 U.S.C.
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
US v. Arthur Simmons Doc. 0 Case: 09-4534 Document: 49 Date Filed: 03/17/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-4534 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No (D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV LH-CG and ALFONSO THOMPSON,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit January 9, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court Plaintiff - Appellee,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 16-3764 United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jonathon Lee Kinney lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Case: 3:00-cr-00050-WHR-MRM Doc #: 81 Filed: 06/16/17 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 472 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-12626 Date Filed: 06/17/2016 Page: 1 of 9 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS IN RE: JOSEPH ROGERS, JR., FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-12626-J Petitioner. Application for Leave to
More informationMICHIGAN OFFENSES WHICH ARE OR ARE NOT CRIMES OF VIOLENCE (AS OF AUGUST 14, 2018) SIXTH CIRCUIT AND EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN CASES PAGE 1
AND EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN CASES PAGE 1 Johnson v United States, 135 SCt 2551 (2015) changed the landscape as to what is a crime of violence under ACCA (for felon in possession cases) and under USSG
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Appellee, No v. N.D. Okla. JIMMY LEE SHARBUTT, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 12, 2008 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, No. 07-5151 v. N.D.
More informationI. Potential Challenges Post-Johnson (Other Than Career Offender).
I. Potential Challenges Post-Johnson (Other Than Career Offender). A. Non-ACCA gun cases under U.S.S.G. 2K2.1. U.S.S.G. 2K2.1 imposes various enhancements for one or more prior crimes of violence. According
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TRAVIS BECKLES, PETITIONER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
No. 15-8544 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TRAVIS BECKLES, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7056 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. THILO BROWN, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court
More informationTHE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017
THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017 https://youtu.be/d8cb5wk2t-8 CAREER OFFENDER. WE WILL DISCUSS GENERAL APPLICATION ( 4B1.1) CRIME OF VIOLENCE ( 4B1.2(a))
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
15 3313 cr United States v. Smith In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2016 No. 15 3313 cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EDWARD SMITH, Defendant Appellant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 3:12-cr-00087-JMM Document 62 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : No. 3:12cr87 : No. 3:16cv313 v. : :
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 11-2444 United States of America llllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Alfred Tucker lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant No. 11-2489
More informationFederal Sentencing Guidelines FJC Court Web Alan Dorhoffer Deputy Director, Office of Education
Federal Sentencing Guidelines FJC Court Web Alan Dorhoffer Deputy Director, Office of Education Johnson v. U.S., 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) 2 The Armed Career Criminal Act s residual clause is unconstitutionally
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION * THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Crim. No. DKC-04-0256 * v. Civil No. * KEVIN KILPATRICK BATEN * * * * * * SUPPLEMENT TO
More informationNO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, Trevon Sykes - Petitioner. vs. United State of America - Respondent.
NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 2017 Trevon Sykes - Petitioner vs. United State of America - Respondent. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Levell D. Littleton Attorney for Petitioner 1221
More informationCase 3:15-cr EMC Document 83 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I.
Case :-cr-00-emc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN BAIRES-REYES, Defendant. Case No. -cr-00-emc- ORDER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr JLK-1. versus
Case: 16-12951 Date Filed: 04/06/2017 Page: 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-12951 D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20815-JLK-1 [DO NOT PUBLISH] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: February 26, 2018 Decided: January 4, 2019 ) Docket No.
--cr Shabazz v. United States of America 0 0 0 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 0 (Argued: February, 0 Decided: January, 0 ) Docket No. AL MALIK FRUITKWAN SHABAZZ, fka
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TREVON SYKES, PETITIONER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
No. 16-9604 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TREVON SYKES, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
More informationCase 3:15-cr Document 38 Filed 10/08/15 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 146
Case 3:15-cr-00021 Document 38 Filed 10/08/15 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 146 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0146p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, X -- v.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0059p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CARLOS CLIFFORD LOWE, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationCase 9:02-cr DWM Document 55 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Case 9:02-cr-00045-DWM Document 55 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION FILED AUG 0 3 2016 Clerk, U S District Court District Of
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14 2898 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, ANTWON JENKINS, v. Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court
More informationNO: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2015 TRAVIS BECKLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
NO: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2015 TRAVIS BECKLES, v. Petitioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationCase 3:12-cr SI Document 48 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Case 3:12-cr-00604-SI Document 48 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, Case No. 3:12-cr-00604-SI OPINION AND
More informationNo. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER 2011 TERM. RICARDO MARRERO, Petitioner. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent
No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER 2011 TERM RICARDO MARRERO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner, Ricardo Marrero,
More informationNo. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. October Term 2013
No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term 2013 DANIEL RAUL ESPINOZA, PETITIONER V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationWhen Is A Felony Not A Felony?: A New Approach to Challenging Recidivist-Based Charges and Sentencing Enhancements
When Is A Felony Not A Felony?: A New Approach to Challenging Recidivist-Based Charges and Sentencing Enhancements Alan DuBois Senior Appellate Attorney Federal Public Defender-Eastern District of North
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASON LEE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 13-10517 D.C. No. 3:09-cr-00193-CRB-1 OPINION Appeal
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
15 1518 cr United States v. Jones In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM, 2015 ARGUED: APRIL 27, 2016 DECIDED: JULY 21, 2016 No. 15 1518 cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
More informationFEDERAL REPORTER, 3d SERIES
964 771 FEDERAL REPORTER, 3d SERIES V. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court., UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Derrick Montez BALL, Defendant Appellant.
More informationCase 1:17-cr TSE Document 216 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1545 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:17-cr-00106-TSE Document 216 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1545 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAMONT
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6070 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff Appellee, JAMES ERIC JONES, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER
Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00545-MSK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER DEFENDANT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 563 U. S. (2011) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-4-2014 USA v. Kevin Abbott Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 13-2216 Follow this and additional
More informationCase 3:16-cv ADC Document 6 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Case 3:16-cv-02368-ADC Document 6 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO FERNANDO BAELLA-PABÓN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil No. 16-2368
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-4-2006 USA v. Rivera Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-5329 Follow this and additional
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
17 757 cr United States v. Townsend In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2017 No. 17 757 cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. TYREK TOWNSEND, Defendant Appellant.
More informationin its distribution. Defendant appealed.
U.S. v. OBEY Cite as 790 F.3d 545 (4th Cir. 2015) 545, UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Gregory Devon OBEY, Defendant Appellant. No. 14 4585. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CASSANDRA ANNE KASOWSKI, PETITIONER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
No. 16-9649 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CASSANDRA ANNE KASOWSKI, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit
1 pr Stuckey v. United States 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 01 No. 1 1 pr SEAN STUCKEY, Petitioner Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2018 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
More informationUSA v. Kelin Manigault
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-16-2013 USA v. Kelin Manigault Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 13-3499 Follow this and
More information4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014
4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014 PART B - CAREER OFFENDERS AND CRIMINAL LIVELIHOOD 4B1.1. Career Offender (a) (b) A defendant is a career offender if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years
More informationCrimes of Violence Updates. Michael Dwyer and Brocca Morrison Office of the Federal Public Defender, EDMO
Crimes of Violence Updates Michael Dwyer and Brocca Morrison Office of the Federal Public Defender, EDMO United States v. Naylor, 887 F.3d 397 (8th Cir. 2018) United States v. Naylor, 887 F.3d 397 (8th
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-3-2016 USA v. Jose Rivera Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr KMM-1
Case: 14-14547 Date Filed: 03/16/2016 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-14547 D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-20353-KMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, versus
More informationMens Rea Defect Overturns 15 Year Enhancement
Mens Rea Defect Overturns 15 Year Enhancement Felony Urination with Intent Three Strikes Yer Out Darryl Jones came to Spokane, Washington in Spring, 1991 to help a friend move. A police officer observed
More informationCase 3:16-cr BR Document 671 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 16
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 671 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, AMMON BUNDY, JON RITZHEIMER, JOSEPH
More informationWhen a State Felony is not A Federal Felony. Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder
When a State Felony is not A Federal Felony Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder Federal Felony Definition, generally: a conviction punishable by a term that exceeds one year imprisonment If the term exceeding
More informationWilliam & Mary Bill of Rights Journal. Jake Albert. Volume 25 Issue 2 Article 13
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 25 Issue 2 Article 13 The Flawed Reasoning Behind Johnson v. United States and a Solution: Why a Facts-Based Approach Should Have Been Used to Interpret the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 14-51238 Document: 00513286141 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/25/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee United States Court of Appeals
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES Where to find the Guidelines ONLINE at www.ussc.gov/guidelines In print from Westlaw Chapter Organization Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Offense Conduct Chapter
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-24-2008 USA v. Lister Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-1476 Follow this and additional
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No J
Case: 16-12084 Date Filed: 06/01/2016 Page: 1 of 10 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS IN RE: RICARDO PINDER, JR., FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-12084-J Petitioner. Application for Leave
More informationNO. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2006
NO. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2006 LARRY BEGAY, vs. Petitioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal Number: P-H ) DUCAN FANFAN )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal Number: 03-47-P-H ) DUCAN FANFAN ) GOVERNMENT'S REPLY SENTENCING MEMORANDUM NOW COMES the United States of America,
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 14-30168, 09/22/2015, ID: 9692783, DktEntry: 39, Page 1 of 24 No. 14-30168 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, EDDIE RAY STRICKLAND,
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
16 4129 cr United States v. Castillo In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2017 No. 16 4129 cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. JUAN CASTILLO, Defendant Appellee.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff - Appellee, No v. (D. Kansas) HARLEY YOAKUM, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit March 24, 2009 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 08-3183
More informationPart III discusses inchoate crimes, which will remain in the commentary even after the August 1, 2016 amendment.
Commentary Offenses, March 3, 2016, revised March 18, 2016 Amy Baron-Evans, Jennifer Coffin Part I explains why offenses currently listed in the guideline s commentary that do not satisfy the force clause,
More informationJOHNSON V. UNITED STATES: ITS IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES: ITS IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS Jennifer Niles Coffin Christine Madeleine Lee I. Pre-Johnson world DISCUSSION OVERVIEW II. Summary of Johnson, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) III. Implications
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 18-10016 D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00057- JCM-CWH-1
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit
17 70 cr United States v. Hoskins In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2017 Argued: January 9, 2018 Decided: September 26, 2018 Docket No. 17 70 cr UNITED STATES OF
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before GORSUCH, SEYMOUR, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT November 25, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court Plaintiff - Appellee, v.
More informationCase: Document: 48 Filed: 09/15/2015 Pages: 23. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1731 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DARRYL ROLLINS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 15-8544 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- TRAVIS BECKLES,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1071 LEONEL JIMENEZ-GONZALEZ, v. Petitioner, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent. Petition for Review of
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 17-1680 STACY M. HAYNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
More informationUSA v. Franklin Thompson
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-7-2016 USA v. Franklin Thompson Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-26-2008 USA v. Bonner Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-3763 Follow this and additional
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DEMARCUS O. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 15-CV-1070-MJR vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) REAGAN, Chief
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 17-2282 & 17-2724 DE ANGELO A. CROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee, and CARL LEO DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
More informationv No Wayne Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED November 21, 2017 v No. 333317 Wayne Circuit Court LAKEISHA NICOLE GUNN, LC No.
More informationTENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff - Appellee, No v. N.D. Okla. ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 06-5154 v. N.D. Okla. September 11, 2007 Elisabeth A.
More informationOFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA U.S. SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE
OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA U.S. SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE Criminal Cases Decided Between September 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011 and Granted Review for
More information1 18 U.S.C. 924(e) (2012). 2 Id. 924(e)(1). Without the ACCA enhancement, the maximum sentence for a defendant
CRIMINAL LAW ARMED CAREER CRIMINAL ACT EIGHTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT GENERIC BURGLARY REQUIRES INTENT AT FIRST MOMENT OF TRESPASS. United States v. McArthur, 850 F.3d 925 (8th Cir. 2017). The Armed Career
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 06a0071n.06 Filed: January 26, No
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 06a0071n.06 Filed: January 26, 2006 No. 04-3431 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee,
More information