Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11
|
|
- Jeffry Cameron
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 Criminal Action No. 05-cr MSK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER DEFENDANT S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT S ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANT S NOTICE OF INTENT TO WAIVE APPEARANCE AT RE-SENTENCING HEARING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANT S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR FURLOUGH Defendant Joseph P. Nacchio respectfully requests that the Court reconsider its Order dated April 13, 2010 [Docket # 603] ( Order ) requiring that the United States Marshal shall forthwith and using best efforts transport Mr. Nacchio to the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse and bring him before the Court at the earliest possible time for an advisement hearing. Order at 7. In the alternative, Mr. Nacchio respectfully requests that the Court request and recommend that the Warden grant Mr. Nacchio a brief furlough pursuant to 28 C.F.R (a)(8) in order to attend the proposed advisement hearing at his own expense, and in order to permit the hearings scheduled for April 21 and 22 to proceed as planned. Counsel for Mr. Nacchio has contacted the United States Marshals Service Justice Prisoner and Alien
2 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 11 Transportation System Prison Transportation headquarters and was informed that under current scheduling, the Marshals Service would not be able to be transport a prisoner in Pennsylvania to Denver until sometime in May, well after the currently scheduled hearings. 1 Because of Mr. Nacchio s request for expedited consideration and the time-sensitive nature of the matter, counsel has consulted with the United States. The government objects to the requested relief, but authorized us to state that the government agrees with Mr. Nacchio that maintaining the current sentencing schedule is in both parties interest. Given that maintaining the current sentencing schedule is of paramount importance to the Court and the parties, Mr. Nacchio respectfully requests the Court to hold a hearing on this motion today. Counsel for Mr. Nacchio is in Denver and can appear in person. I. DEFENDANT RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THAT THE COURT ACCEPT WAIVER BY MEANS OTHER THAN A PERSONAL STATEMENT IN COURT Because of the difficulties this Court identified regarding transporting Mr. Nacchio to Denver for an advisement hearing, requiring him to appear in person to waive his right to be present at his resentencing vitiates the reasons for the waiver and also threatens to disrupt the current sentencing schedule. Both Mr. Nacchio and the government agree that maintaining the current sentencing schedule is in both parties interest. Additionally, next week s hearing involves testimony from expert witnesses who can be difficult to schedule. In the section below, Nacchio describes the case law indicating that courts frequently accept written waivers and notes that an in-person waiver is not required. Given the case law cited below, Nacchio respectfully requests that he be permitted to waive his right to personally 1 The information provided was not specific to Mr. Nacchio and the government has also called the Marshals Service, but as of yet has been unable to ascertain more specific details. 2
3 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 11 appear at his resentencing hearings by affidavit, telephonically, through defense counsel, or via videoconference. Indeed, we have attached a written waiver, signed by Mr. Nacchio this morning, to this motion. See Defendant Joseph P. Nacchio s Waiver of Appearance, attached as Exhibit A. Although this Court identified factors it believes weigh in favor of an in-person appearance, we respectfully note additional facts of which the Court may not have been aware. Mr. Nacchio has steadfastly maintained his wish to waive his appearance at resentencing. His competence has never been questioned and he has continued to be actively involved in his defense. Mr. Nacchio was represented by the undersigned law firm prior to his previous sentencing. Counsel has spoken with Mr. Nacchio on a weekly or even more frequent basis for more than two years regarding his sentencing, appeal, resentencing, and the upcoming hearings, including during his incarceration over the past year. Moreover, counsel met personally with Mr. Nacchio on March 31, 2010, just two weeks ago, and discussed this same issue. See Declaration of Sean M. Berkowitz, attached as Exhibit B. Counsel for Mr. Nacchio spoke with him today, April 14, 2010, after the Court issued its order, and Mr. Nacchio reiterated that he understood his rights and still wished to waive his right to be present at resentencing. As noted above, Mr. Nacchio also signed a written waiver this morning, voluntarily waiving his right to appear at his resentencing. 2 2 In addition, Judge Nottingham s Amended Memorandum of Sentencing Hearing and Report of Statement of Reasons states that [t]he court addressed defendant personally and determined whether defendant wished to make a statement or present any information in mitigation of the sentence. Docket No. 463 at 1. The fact that Mr. Nacchio chose not to make a personal statement at his initial sentencing hearing after having been afforded the opportunity is 3
4 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 11 In its order, the Court rejected the government s argument that it could compel Mr. Nacchio s presence at sentencing and found that he may waive his right to be present at the resentencing. Order at 4 n.1. The Court noted that Nacchio s waiver is not effective unless it is both informed and voluntarily made. Id. at 4. However, the Court then determined that to assure Mr. Nacchio s awareness of his right to be present at both re-sentencing hearings and to advise him with regard to his anticipated waiver it would require his presence at the earliest possible time for an advisement hearing. Id. at 7. In so holding, the Court noted that often courts presume that a waiver is invalid unless the defendant is advised of his rights in court. Id. at 5. Although courts indulge in a presumption against waiver of constitutional rights, there is no constitutional requirement that a trial court conduct a direct colloquy with the defendant in order for waiver to be knowing and voluntary. See Polizzi v. United States, 926 F.2d 1311, 1322 (2d Cir. 1991) ( [W]e take issue with Polizzi s contention that the trial court must conduct a direct colloquy with the defendant. ); United States v. Sammons, 918 F.2d 592, (6th Cir. 1990) (rejecting claim that colloquy is required by Sixth Amendment). Moreover, courts have rejected the argument that only the defendant c[an] personally waive his right to be present. Polizzi, 926 F.2d at 1322; see also United States v. Crutcher, 405 F.2d 239, 243 (2d Cir. 1968) ( [T]he issue is whether Payne or his counsel have made an effective waiver. ) (emphasis added). In Polizzi, the Second Circuit rejected a defendant s contention that his waiver of presence at trial was not voluntary and knowing because the waiver was not personally made by entirely consistent with his current position and is further evidence that his waiver is indeed knowing and voluntary. 4
5 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 11 him in court. The Court stated that to hold that an effective waiver requires the defendant s personal statement in court, would be to construct a burdensome, impractical and wholly unnecessary rule. 926 F.2d at 1322 (citation omitted). The court further stated that taken to its logical conclusion, such a rule would work the unwieldy result of leaving ineffective as a waiver the voluntary failure to appear for trial. Id. The same logic applies equally with regard to voluntary absence for resentencing. Other courts have agreed that an effective waiver of presence does not require the defendant s personal statement in court. See, e.g., United States v. Gallo, 763 F.2d 1504, 1529 (6th Cir. 1985) (finding a waiver of the right to be present valid upon defense counsel s representation that he talked with defendant and ascertained that defendant wished to waive the right to be present for the conclusion of the case-in-chief); United States v. Ammar, 919 F.2d 13, 17 (3d Cir. 1990) (holding that the district court could properly resentence defendant in absentia where defendant-petitioner suggested in correspondence to court of appeals that he is reluctant to travel from Florida where he is currently working and participating in a rational behavior training program, a weekly counselor interview, and regular urine testing ); United States v. Marmolejos, No , 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9058, at *3 (E.D. Pa. June 18, 1998) ( Defendant has expressly waived his right to be present at his re-sentencing. See affidavit of Freddie Marmolejos. Defendant s waiver is found to be knowingly and voluntarily made, and sufficient to allow sentencing in absentia. ); United States v. Boykin, 222 F. Supp. 398, 399 (D. Md. 1963) (finding a waiver of the right to be present at sentencing valid upon defense counsel s representation and affidavit from defendant). In Rigas, moreover, both defendants knowingly and voluntarily waived their right to be present through written waiver as opposed to personal 5
6 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 11 appearance in court. United States v. Rigas, No. 02 Cr. 1236, 2008 WL , at *1 (S.D.N.Y June 24, 2008). Indeed, the government has already effectively conceded that a written waiver from Nacchio would be sufficient. See Objection at 16 n.6 [Docket No. 601] (stating that the Court may wish to require the Defendant to file not only the pleading already filed by his defense counsel, but also a waiver signed by the Defendant himself ). Courts have also found valid waivers of other constitutional rights made outside of court. See, e.g., Spytma v. Howes, 313 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 2002) (waiver of jury trial by 15-year-old defendant was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent, in murder prosecution, even though trial court did not conduct colloquy with defendant on the record prior to accepting jury waiver, and defendant claimed he was never asked about it in open court, where defendant signed written waiver form and defendant was represented by counsel); United States v. Riddle, 249 F.3d 529 (6th Cir. 2001) (defendants waiver, through their counsel, of right to be present during jury voir dire was effective when defense counsel suggested defendants absence to avoid any prejudice from appearance of heavy security during questioning of potential jurors and court allowed waiver only after instructing defense counsel to consult with defendants and receiving assurances of waiver; trial court was not required to engage defendants in on-the-record colloquy before allowing them to absent themselves from proceedings); Carter v. Newkirk, 6 Fed. Appx. 461 (7th Cir. 2001) (reversing the grant of habeas corpus to a defendant who argued that the Constitution requires an on-the-record colloquy before a defendant may waive his right to a jury trial because there is no such requirement and approving of the finding of waiver by the Indiana appellate court based on both a signed waiver by the defendant and the testimony of the defendant s counsel was sufficient to find waiver); United States v. Wenger, 58 F.3d 280, 282 (7th Cir. 1995) 6
7 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 11 ( Most waivers are effective when set out in writing and signed... ); United States v. Robinson, 8 F.3d 418, 423 (7th Cir. 1993) (intimating regarding a jury trial waiver that evidence of a discussion between the trial judge and defense counsel directly confirming that the waiver is knowing and voluntary may be sufficient to prove a valid waiver). Although the Court cites United States v. Gordon, 829 F.2d 119, 125 (D.C. Cir. 1987), we respectfully note that Gordon has been called into doubt by a number of other courts that have specifically found that a defendant s counsel may waive his constitutional rights on his behalf. See Gallo, 763 F.2d at 1529; see also People v. Gutierrez, 29 Cal. 4th 1196, 1209 (Cal. 2003) (stating that Gordon do[es] not support the conclusion that a custodial defendant who expresses a clear desire to be voluntarily absent from proceedings must confirm that desire through oral waiver in open court ). 3 Although the Court recognized that Mr. Nacchio has a right, not on obligation, to be present at his resentencing, its order essentially transforms that right into an obligation by requiring him to appear in person to waive his right to be present at resentencing. Given the case law, additional facts identified by counsel, and the written waiver executed by Mr. Nacchio this morning, we respectfully request that the Court reconsider its decision requiring Mr. Nacchio to 3 It is also worth nothing that the Tenth Circuit dismisses filed appeals upon a defendant s execution of an express written consent form, which indicates that the court would uphold a signed, express written waiver of appeal as knowing and voluntary. See Circuit Rule 46.3(B) ( A voluntary motion to dismiss a criminal appeal or an appeal in a postconviction proceeding must contain a statement, signed by the appellant, demonstrating knowledge of the right to appeal and expressly electing to withdraw the appeal. If the statement is not included, counsel must show that exceptional circumstances prevented its inclusion. Proof of service must include service on the appellant him or herself. ). 7
8 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 11 appear in person for an advisement hearing and accept his knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to appear. II. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NACCHIO REQUESTS A FURLOUGH TO TRAVEL TO DENVER FOR AN ADVISEMENT HEARING AT HIS OWN EXPENSE In the alternative, Nacchio requests that he be granted furlough to attend the proposed advisement hearing at his own expense. See 28 C.F.R (a)(8) (authorizing the Warden or Acting Warden of any Bureau of Prisons institution to grant a furlough [t]o appear in a criminal court proceeding when the use of a furlough request is requested or recommended by the applicable court ). Counsel for Mr. Nacchio contacted the Marshal s Service Prisoner Transportation Headquarters at (816) on April 14, Counsel was informed that the Marshals Service has a currently scheduled flight from Pennsylvania to Oklahoma City on Monday, April 19, 2010, but that it could not transport a prisoner currently in Pennsylvania from Oklahoma City to Denver until sometime in May. Under the Court s order, Mr. Nacchio s hearing would be postponed and he would be forced to spend weeks in Oklahoma City awaiting transport to Denver. In addition, the Marshals Service could not confirm the time frame for a prisoner s return transport to Pennsylvania. It is not inconceivable that Mr. Nacchio could spend months in transport. Such a scenario would vitiate the entire purpose of the waiver of his right to be present at his resentencing, disrupt his participation in prison programs, and deprive him of visitation with his family. Moreover, maintaining the current schedule is of the utmost importance, given that under one of the possible gain calculations, Mr. Nacchio has already served as of today, April 14, 2010 the maximum recommended guidelines sentence. 8
9 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 11 In its order, the Court noted that it appreciated that requiring that Mr. Nacchio be physically present is inconvenient, expensive, and time consuming. Order at 6. Granting furlough would resolve these concerns. First, it would place the expense of traveling to Denver on Mr. Nacchio, not the government. Second, a furlough would permit Mr. Nacchio to avoid the inconvenience of being transported over a lengthy period by the Marshal s service. Finally, and most importantly, given the parties interests in expeditiously resolving Mr. Nacchio s case, granting him furlough would permit the Court to adhere to its current schedule and hold the first sentencing hearing on April 21, Moreover, case law establishes that Mr. Nacchio is the type of individual to whom furlough should be granted. See United States v. Cohoe, No. CR JB, 2007 WL (D.N.M. May 15, 2007) (granting furlough where defendant had performed well after pleading guilty, including negative results on all drug and alcohol tests). Mr. Nacchio has been a model prisoner and has had no disciplinary problems during his incarceration. He has taken a number of classes as well as been involved in a number of religious activities. Additionally, this Court has specifically found that Nacchio is neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community. See United States v. Anderson, No. CR JB, 2009 WL (D.N.M. July 29, 2009) (denying in part furlough request because defendant was flight risk, had a history of failing to appear, and was considered a danger to community). Accordingly, in the interest of efficiency and fairness, if the Court requires Mr. Nacchio s presence at an advisement hearing, he respectfully requests to be permitted to travel on furlough. 9
10 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 11 III. CONCLUSION Mr. Nacchio respectfully requests the Court to reconsider its order obligating him to appear in person to waive his right to be present at his resentencing. In the alternative, given that the Court s order will postpone Mr. Nacchio s resentencing hearings because under currently scheduled transportation plans the Marshals Service cannot transport him to Denver until May at the earliest, Mr. Nacchio respectfully requests the Court to request the Warden for furlough to travel to Denver before April 21, 2010 to maintain the current resentencing schedule. Counsel for Mr. Nacchio is in Denver today and respectfully requests a hearing on this emergency motion. Respectfully submitted this 14th day of April, s/ Sean M. Berkowitz Sean M. Berkowitz LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Sears Tower Suite 5800 Chicago, IL (312) (312) (facsimile) Sean.Berkowitz@lw.com Maureen E. Mahoney Everett C. Johnson, Jr. Nathan H. Seltzer LATHAM & WATKINS LLP th Street, N.W. Suite 1000 Washington, DC (202) (202) (facsimile) Maureen.Mahoney@lw.com Everett.Johnson@lw.com Nathan.Seltzer@lw.com 10
11 Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 14th day of April 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing DEFENDANT S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT S ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANT S NOTICE OF INTENT TO WAIVE APPEARANCE AT RE-SENTENCING HEARING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANT S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR FURLOUGH with the Clerk of the Court using the Court s CM/ECF system, which will send notification of the filing to the following: James O. Hearty james.hearty@usdoj.gov Paul E. Pelletier paul.pelletier@usdoj.gov Kevin Thomas Traskos kevin.traskos@usdoj.gov Alain Leibman aleibman@foxrothschild.com s/ Sean M. Berkowitz Sean M. Berkowitz LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Sears Tower Suite 5800 Chicago, IL (312) (312) (facsimile)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER
Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00545-MSK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER
Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00545-MSK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER DEFENDANT
More informationCase 1:05-cr MSK Document 601 Filed 03/15/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:05-cr-00545-MSK Document 601 Filed 03/15/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Criminal Case No. 05-cr-00545-MSK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Edward W. Nottingham
Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 478 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Edward W. Nottingham Criminal Action No. 1:05-cr-00545-EWN-ALL UNITED
More informationCase 1:05-cr EWN Document 308 Filed 03/27/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 308 Filed 03/27/2007 Page 1 of 8 Criminal Case No. 05-cr-00545-EWN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, 1. JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368
Case 213-cr-00183-MHW-TPK Doc # 56 Filed 08/28/14 Page 1 of 7 PAGEID # 368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 213-CR-183
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cr-000-sab Document Filed 0/0/ 0 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN BRANNON SUTTLE III, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NO. :-cr-000-sab ORDER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DEMARCUS O. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 15-CV-1070-MJR vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) REAGAN, Chief
More informationCase 1:05-cr EWN Document 332 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 332 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 8 Criminal Case No. 05-cr-00545-EWN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, 1. JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46 (1:01CR45 & 3:01CR11-3)
Greer v. USA Doc. 19 Case 1:04-cv-00046-LHT Document 19 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger
Civil Action No. 05-cv-00480-MSK-CBS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, ROBERT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-31-2011 USA v. Irvin Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-3582 Follow this and additional
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-7-2007 USA v. Robinson Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-2372 Follow this and additional
More informationCase 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7
Case 1:05-cv-00480-MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 Civil Action No. 05-cv-00480-MSK-CBS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia
More informationCase 1:13-cv MMS Document 54 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:13-cv-00466-MMS Document 54 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JOSEPH CACCIAPALLE, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. 13-cv-00466-MMS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Scott v. Cain Doc. 920100202 Case: 08-30631 Document: 00511019048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/02/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit
More informationCase 1:05-cr EWN Document Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 43
Page 1 of 43 Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 474-3 Filed 0 Page 1 of 43 U.S. District Court District of Colorado (Denver) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:05-cr-00545-EWN All Defendants Internal Use Only
More informationUSA v. Michael Bankoff
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-28-2013 USA v. Michael Bankoff Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 11-4073 Follow this and
More informationCase: Document: 4-1 Filed: 07/08/2018 Page: 1. No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Case: 18-5683 Document: 4-1 Filed: 07/08/2018 Page: 1 No. 18-5683 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellant v. RENE BOUCHER Appellee On Appeal from
More information2018 CO 89. No. 16SC515, People v. Janis Right to Be Present Waiver Formal Advisements.
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado
More informationCase 1:05-cr EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12 Criminal Case No. 05 cr 00545 EWN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Edward W. Nottingham UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 3:12-cr-00087-JMM Document 62 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : No. 3:12cr87 : No. 3:16cv313 v. : :
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Frett, 2012-Ohio-3363.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97538 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DEMETRIOUS A. FRETT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH PLAINTIFFS V. NO. 1:06cv1080-LTS-RHW STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, FORENSIC
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No RUSSELL EUGENE BLESSMAN, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 4, 2009 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 08-4182
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC17-878 MILO A. ROSE, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [July 19, 2018] Discharged counsel appeals the postconviction court s order granting Milo A. Rose
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2009 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-2-2009 USA v. Chesney Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-2494 Follow this and additional
More informationPost Conviction Proceedings - Waiver - When a petitioner fails to file an Application for Leave to Appeal following an Alford plea, his right to
Post Conviction Proceedings - Waiver - When a petitioner fails to file an Application for Leave to Appeal following an Alford plea, his right to raise the issue in a Petition for Post Conviction Relief
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Nos. 114, ,187 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. TERRY F. WALLING, Appellant,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION Nos. 114,186 114,187 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS TERRY F. WALLING, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Johnson District
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case: 5:17-cr-00121-KKC Doc #: 26 Filed: 06/28/18 Page: 1 of 8 - Page ID#: 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:17-CR-121-KKC UNITED
More informationCase: 1:12-cr Document #: 297 Filed: 11/15/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:2421
Case: 1:12-cr-00723 Document #: 297 Filed: 11/15/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:2421 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 12 CR 723, 13
More informationOFFICE OF THE CLERK B
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80257 Elizabeth A. Shumaker (303) 844-3157 Douglas E. Cressler
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 16, 2008 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 16, 2008 Session DANNY A. STEWART v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 2000-A-431, 2000-C-1395,
More information: : CRIMINAL DIVISION : : : Notice of Intent to Dismiss PCRA : Without Holding An Evidentiary Hearing OPINION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PA vs. DAVID GEHR, : No. CR-1010-2015 : : CRIMINAL DIVISION : : : Notice of Intent to Dismiss PCRA : Without Holding An Evidentiary
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00545-MSK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Defendant. MOTION BY FOR NEW TRIAL
More informationTimmy Mills v. Francisco Quintana
2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-10-2010 Timmy Mills v. Francisco Quintana Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-3004 Follow
More informationUSA v. Ulysses Gonzalez
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-30-2012 USA v. Ulysses Gonzalez Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-1521 Follow this and
More informationCase 1:16-cr AJT Document 39 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 126
Case 1:16-cr-00064-AJT Document 39 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 126 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-7-2014 USA v. Craig Grimes Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket 12-4523 Follow this and additional
More informationTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE,
[Cite as State v. Sarkozy, 117 Ohio St.3d 86, 2008-Ohio-509.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SARKOZY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Sarkozy, 117 Ohio St.3d 86, 2008-Ohio-509.] Criminal law Postrelease
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-12-2007 Allen v. Nash Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-1968 Follow this and additional
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2091 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Glenn Verser, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey Barfield, Douglas Gooding, Ryan Robinson, and Chris W. Davis, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal
More information2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14984, * DARBERTO GARCIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 04-CV-0465
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14984, * DARBERTO GARCIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 04-CV-0465 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division - IN RE: BLACKWATER ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT LITIGATION Case No. 1:09-cv-615 Case No. 1:09-cv-616 Case No. 1:09-cv-617
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
Appellate Case: 13-1466 Document: 01019479219 Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 1 No. 13-1466 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, RANDY
More informationCase 1:18-cv LTB Document 18 Filed 11/29/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:18-cv-02744-LTB Document 18 Filed 11/29/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 Civil Action No. 18-cv-02744-LTB DELANO TENORIO, v. Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
More informationDodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)
Dodge County (Sixth Judicial District) 1. Rules of Decorum 2. Civil Practice 3. Rules of Criminal Procedure 4. Rules of Family Court Procedure 5. Filing of Papers by Electronic Filing and Facsimile Transmission
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Case 3:19-cr-00121-GAG Document 65 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. 19-121 (GAG-MEL) Plaintiff v. ISADORA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiffs CRIMINAL DOCKET CR-09-351 BRIAN DUNN V. HON. RICHARD P. CONABOY Defendant SENTENCING MEMORANDUM
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT STATE OF NEVADA, et al., No. 16-41606 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., Defendants-Appellants. APPELLEES OPPOSITION
More informationMaurice Andre Parker v. State of Maryland, No. 2119, September Term, 2003
HEADNOTE: Maurice Andre Parker v. State of Maryland, No. 2119, September Term, 2003 CORAM NOBIS An enhanced sentence under the federal sentencing guidelines, which is enhanced as a result of that conviction(s)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 16:33:38 2015-CP-01418-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01418-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationCase 1:17-cv WYD-MEH Document 9 Filed 09/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:17-cv-02280-WYD-MEH Document 9 Filed 09/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-02280-WYD-MEH ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
More informationDEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND FOR SPECIAL JURY INSTRUCTION. COMES NOW, the Defendant, JOHN GOODMAN, by and through his undersigned
Filing # 18763901 Electronically Filed 09/29/2014 12:56:12 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502010CF005829AMB STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationCASE 0:14-cr ADM-FLN Document 118 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:14-cr-00311-ADM-FLN Document 118 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 7 United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION v. AND ORDER Criminal No. 14-311
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document May 5 2017 13:43:04 2016-CP-01474-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LYNDON BRITAIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01474 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARBARA BYRD-BENNETT No. 15 CR 620 Hon. Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CLE JOSEPH F. CAPUZZO, Appellant, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No. 78,379 Appellee. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH DISTRICT RESPONDENT'S
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, 02-50024-02 v. SENIOR JUDGE XXX XXX MAGISTRATE JUDGE XXX XXXXXX XXX,
More informationUSA v. Edward McLaughlin
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-25-2016 USA v. Edward McLaughlin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationLEO 1880: QUESTIONS PRESENTED:
LEO 1880: OBLIGATIONS OF A COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO ADVISE HIS INDIGENT CLIENT OF THE RIGHT OF APPEAL FOLLOWING CONVICTION UPON A GUILTY PLEA; DUTY OF COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO FOLLOW THE INDIGENT
More informationCase 1:10-cr LEK Document 425 Filed 08/21/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1785 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Case 1:10-cr-00384-LEK Document 425 Filed 08/21/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1785 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, ROGER CUSICK CHRISTIE
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 16, 2001
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 16, 2001 DEBORAH LOUISE REESE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal as of Right from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No.
More informationCite as 2018 Ark. App. 477 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I
Cite as 2018 Ark. App. 477 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CR-18-205 Opinion Delivered: October 3, 2018 JAMES NEAL BYNUM V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLANT APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE SCOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT
More informationPUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit July 7, 2015 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff S Appellee,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO. 1D AHMAD J. SMITH Appellant-Petitioner,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO. 1D11-1226 AHMAD J. SMITH Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee-Respondent. A DIRECT APPEAL OF AN ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT
More informationSOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE Accepted and approved, as amended, by the Standing Administrative Committee on June 22, 2001 SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES COAST GUARD. vs. David Roy Shakespeare
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Complainant vs. David Roy Shakespeare Respondent Docket Number 2016-0275 Enforcement Activity
More informationCase 3:10-cv HLH Document 19 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:10-cv-00315-HLH Document 19 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, A federally recognized Indian Tribe, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationSTATE OF OHIO JAMAR TRIPLETT
[Cite as State v. Triplett, 2009-Ohio-2571.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91807 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JAMAR TRIPLETT
More informationCase 1:15-mc ESH Document 17 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-mc-00410-ESH Document 17 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CBS BROADCASTING INC., Misc.
More informationCase: 1:03-cr Document #: 205 Filed: 10/06/10 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:535
Case: 1:03-cr-00636 Document #: 205 Filed: 10/06/10 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:535 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) No. 03 CR 636-6 Plaintiff/Respondent,
More informationYOUR ROLE AS STANDBY COUNSEL. Paul K. Sun, Jr. Ellis & Winters LLP
YOUR ROLE AS STANDBY COUNSEL Paul K. Sun, Jr. Ellis & Winters LLP Our experience has taught us that a pro se defense is usually a bad defense, particularly when compared to a defense provided by an experienced
More informationSUMMARY ORDER. Present: ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
17-2112-cr United States v. Richards UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or
More informationSCWC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. vs. STANLEY S.L. KONG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000393 13-JUN-2013 02:57 PM SCWC-11-0000393 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. STANLEY S.L. KONG,
More informationFROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF DANVILLE Joseph W. Milam, Jr., Judge
PRESENT: All the Justices ELDESA C. SMITH OPINION BY v. Record No. 141487 JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY February 12, 2016 TAMMY BROWN, WARDEN, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit
17 70 cr United States v. Hoskins In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2017 Argued: January 9, 2018 Decided: September 26, 2018 Docket No. 17 70 cr UNITED STATES OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD DAVIS, No. 21, 2002 Defendant Below, Appellant, Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, v. in and for New Castle County STATE OF DELAWARE,
More informationCase 3:07-cr JM Document 25 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 12
Case :0-cr-0-JM Document Filed 0//0 Page of KAREN P. HEWITT United States Attorney NICOLE ACTON JONES TARA MCGRATH Assistant U.S. Attorneys California State Bar Nos., Federal Office Building 0 Front Street,
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00-fjm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Michael Jackson, vs. Randy Tracy, Petitioner, Respondent. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. CV -0-PHX-FJM (ECV REPORT AND
More informationCourt of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER People of MI v Larry Deshawn Lee Docket No. 333664 Michael J. Kelly Presiding Judge Amy Ronayne Krause LC No. 06-000987-FH; 06-000988-FH Mark T. Boonstra Judges
More informationRULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE
RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the following amendments to the Rules of Appellate Procedure were adopted to take effect on January 1, 2019. The amendments were approved
More information3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1
3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments 2008 - Page 1 1 L.A.R. 1.0 SCOPE AND TITLE OF RULES 2 1.1 Scope and Organization of Rules 3 The following Local Appellate Rules (L.A.R.) are adopted
More informationCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND
33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND Due to changes to the Ohio Administrative Code regarding the qualifications of and the process for appointing assigned counsel to indigent clients (OAC:120-1-10),
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2010 ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-1978 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed May 28, 2010 Appeal
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, 3:03-CR-145-H v. XXX XXX, Defendant. ADDENDUM TO MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLEA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. No. 1: 08cr0079 (JCC KYLE DUSTIN FOGGO, aka DUSTY FOGGO, Defendant. MOTION FOR ORDER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-00516-MW-CAS Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JOHN DOE, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 4:17-cv-516 On removal from
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 01-57AP JOHN SHARPE. Appellant-Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 01-57AP JOHN SHARPE Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee-Respondent. A DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT, FOURTH
More informationCase 1:13-cv MSK-MJW Document 3 Filed 05/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:13-cv-01300-MSK-MJW Document 3 Filed 05/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 Instructions Regarding Notice of Availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction Pursuant to 28
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:07-cv-00896-BBM Document 18 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JACK E. ALDERMAN * * Plaintiff, * CIVIL ACTION
More informationENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO DECEMBER TERM, 2012
Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2012-111 DECEMBER TERM, 2012 State of Vermont } APPEALED FROM: }
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-3-2016 USA v. Jean Joseph Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationCase 1:05-cr EWN Document 331 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 331 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 15 Criminal Case No. 05-cr-00545-EWN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, 1. JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-492 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- EDDIE L. PEARSON,
More informationNo. 110,421 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ROBERT L. VERGE, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 110,421 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ROBERT L. VERGE, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Although Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S., 133 S. Ct. 2151,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254 (PERSONS IN STATE CUSTODY) 1) The attached form is
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 98,716. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, MICHAEL HUGHES, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 98,716 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MICHAEL HUGHES, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The State must prove a defendant's criminal history score by a preponderance
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA , -8899, -8902, v , -9669
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DORIAN RAFAEL ROMERO, Movant/Petitioner, Case Nos. 2008-cf-8896, -8898, -8899, -8902, v. -9655, -9669 THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationNOS and IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NOS. 29314 and 29315 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES WAYNE SHAMBLIN, aka STEVEN J. SOPER, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE
More information